DOCSLIB.ORG

Arms Trafficker Viktor Bout

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Secrets Exposed?: Selective State Concern and the Prosecution of Notorious Arms Trafficker Viktor Bout Victoria Ellen Collins & Melissa Pujol Critical Criminology The official Journal of the ASC Division on Critical Criminology and the ACJS Section on Critical Criminology ISSN 1205-8629 Crit Crim DOI 10.1007/s10612-015-9281-8 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science +Business Media Dordrecht. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Crit Crim DOI 10.1007/s10612-015-9281-8 Secrets Exposed?: Selective State Concern and the Prosecution of Notorious Arms Trafficker Viktor Bout 1 1 Victoria Ellen Collins • Melissa Pujol Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 Abstract Criminological scholarship has long recognized that small arms are trafficked through large and complex international networks that involve a multitude of different actors. These actors include different buyers, sellers, brokers, intermediaries, corporations, and most importantly states. Despite this recognition, there has been little research on the duality of the role of states that are both perpetrators and controllers of this crime. Here we analyze the court transcripts and media accounts of the prosecution of notorious arms trafficker Viktor Bout. In doing so, we show that arms trafficking prosecutions fit within the realm of neo-liberal crime control policies where the focus is hyper-individualism and the protection of state legitimacy, which allows for the maintenance of a flourishing arms market. Introduction Estimates indicate that there are approximately 875 million small arms in circulation worldwide (United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs 2013), manufactured by one thousand different companies, and located in nearly one hundred countries (Small Arms Survey 2013). Small arms are defined as ‘‘civilian, private, and military weapons that fire a projectile with the condition that the unit or system may be carried by an individual, a small number of people, or transported by a pack animal or a light vehicle’’ (United Nations General Assembly 1997). They are used by a wide array of actors involved in various criminal enterprises including, but not limited to, insurgents, drug lords, street gangs, pirates, as well as ‘‘traditional’’ street criminals (United Nations Office for & Victoria Ellen Collins [email protected] Melissa Pujol [email protected] 1 School of Justice Studies, Eastern Kentucky University, 521 Lancaster Avenue, Richmond, KY 40475, USA 123 Author's personal copy V. E. Collins, M. Pujol Disarmament Affairs 2013). Small arms have also been responsible for approximately 90 percent of all war casualties since World War II (Bassiouni 2010; Bohlander 2009). Small arms have been used in some of the bloodiest conflicts in recent history including Sierra Leone’s 11 year civil war (Schroeder and Lamb 2006), the genocide in Rwanda (Human Rights Watch Project 1994), and most recently the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq (Small Arms Survey 2013). Although some of these arms reach their destination through legal transactions (termed white market sales), a vast number of them are sold through illicit networks. This is due to the covert nature of transactions that occur on the gray and black market (i.e. the concealed and secretive transfer of arms for money), as well as the abstruse nature of gray market sales that originate with legal state to state transfers but result in arms being transferred to third parties in clear contravention of existing arms embargoes through the utilization of rogue brokers or insurgency groups (Rothe and Collins 2011; Rothe and Ross 2011). Despite this fact, there has been relatively little attention paid to the role of states as complicit or implicit facilitators of arms trafficking (with the exception of Rothe and Ross 2011). While arms trafficking prosecutions are relatively rare in relation to the totality of arms trafficking, they do remain focused on a select number of individuals rather than the broader system or the host of actors involved in making such illegal transactions possible. This is a similar approach that is taken to deal with street crime or the ‘War on Drugs.’ We suggest that through the analysis of the US prosecution of the international arms dealer Viktor Bout, the process of transforming the agenda and framing of Bout as a ‘lone’ arms trafficker further reveals this pattern regardless of the role of the United States and other countries in his illegal arms trafficking. This fits within the realm of neo-liberal crime control policies where the focus is hyper-individualism, selective enforceability, and the protection of state legitimacy. After briefly reviewing the literature on the issue of selective enforcement as it relates to state criminality, we lay out our method for this research before providing a brief history of Viktor Bout including the events that led up to his apprehension in Thailand in 2008. Selectivity of Enforcement: A Brief Review of the Literature As noted above there is relatively little literature that addresses the dual role of the state as both perpetrator and prosecutor of arms trafficking (see Rothe and Ross 2011 for the exception). There does exist however, an established literature so vast it is only possible to address in brief, that calls attention to the selective enforcement of crime control policies by law enforcement and the criminal justice system in general (Alexander 2010; Chambliss 1989; Currie 1998; Massoglia and Warner 2011; Pager 2008; Skolnick 2007; Spelman 2007; Sutherland 1940). Much of this literature draws attention to traditional street crime as it relates to the disparate enforcement of crime control policies that have adverse impacts on certain populations (i.e. racial minorities) (Alpert et al. 2007; Alexander 2010; Brunson 2007; Harris 2007; Mauer and King 2007; Glaze 2010). Other literature illustrates that some crimes, such as white collar, corporate and state crimes, due to the power and status of the offenders escape prosecution or are purposefully omitted from the focus of the criminal justice system (Chambliss 1989; Kramer and Michalowski 2006; Sutherland 1940). This is something that is especially pertinent to the perpetration of state violence 123 Author's personal copy Secrets Exposed?: Selective State Concern and the Prosecution… due to the highly politicized law-making process (Barak, Leighton and Flavin 2010; Chambliss 1989; Hagan 2010; Sutherland 1940; Rothe 2009). Scholars of state crime have long recognized the difficulties of controlling state crime when the state has authority over defining what constitutes criminal behavior (Iadicola and Shupe 2013; Michalowski 1985; Rothe 2009; Rothe and Ross 2011). As argued by Rothe and Ross (2011: 3) ‘‘defining state behaviors as criminal or illegal given the states position to self-define acts as legal or illegal and the concept of harm based definitions’’ is prob- lematic. This is especially true when the state is complicit in the criminal behavior of other states or in corporate offending in the case of state-corporate crime (Cruciotti and Mat- thews 2006; Kramer and Michalowski 2006; Rothe 2009). State crime scholars have argued that states are often complicit in some of the worst crimes such as genocide (Mullins 2009), torture (Smeulers and van Niekerk 2009), piracy (Chambliss 1989; Collins 2014), assassination (Bohlander 2009), drone warfare (Rothe and Collins 2014), as well as behaviors that fall under the umbrella of transnational crime (Andreas and Nadelmann 2006; Burns and Lynch 2004; Friedrichs 2007; Pickering 2007). What has clearly been established is that controlling state crime, whether implicit or complicit, is highly prob- lematic when the state has power over whether its behavior is defined as criminal and the agencies that are responsible for enforcing the law: i.e. the state provides the resources and political justifications for prioritizing the enforcement of some crimes over others as evidenced in the ‘War on Drugs’ and the ‘War on Terror’. It is from this perspective that we approach the issue of arms trafficking and the prosecution of Viktor Bout. Method Here we utilized a qualitative case study approach to examine the framing and presentation of arms trafficking charges against Bout for the 4 years following his apprehension on March 7, 2008. Discourse analysis was used to examine the role of state/s in the prose- cution of an international arms dealer paying particular attention to the power of the state in shaping the course of the trial, creating discourse about the crime itself, and the network of actors both involved in the sting and the charges being prosecuted. In this instance primary data were collected from the US court records of the trial which were accessed through the online electronic filing system (PACER) and through the court reporting service that provided the transcription
Recommended publications
  • First-Run Smoking Presentations in U.S. Movies 1999-2006

    First-Run Smoking Presentations in U.S. Movies 1999-2006

    First-Run Smoking Presentations in U.S. Movies 1999-2006 Jonathan R. Polansky Stanton Glantz, PhD CENTER FOR TOBAccO CONTROL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94143 April 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Smoking among American adults fell by half between 1950 and 2002, yet smoking on U.S. movie screens reached historic heights in 2002, topping levels observed a half century earlier.1 Tobacco’s comeback in movies has serious public health implications, because smoking on screen stimulates adolescents to start smoking,2,3 accounting for an estimated 52% of adolescent smoking initiation. Equally important, researchers have observed a dose-response relationship between teens’ exposure to on-screen smoking and smoking initiation: the greater teens’ exposure to smoking in movies, the more likely they are to start smoking. Conversely, if their exposure to smoking in movies were reduced, proportionately fewer teens would likely start smoking. To track smoking trends at the movies, previous analyses have studied the U.S. motion picture industry’s top-grossing films with the heaviest advertising support, deepest audience penetration, and highest box office earnings.4,5 This report is unique in examining the U.S. movie industry’s total output, and also in identifying smoking movies, tobacco incidents, and tobacco impressions with the companies that produced and/or distributed the films — and with their parent corporations, which claim responsibility for tobacco content choices. Examining Hollywood’s product line-up, before and after the public voted at the box office, sheds light on individual studios’ content decisions and industry-wide production patterns amenable to policy reform.
  • Trafficking in Transnistria: the Role of Russia

    Trafficking in Transnistria: the Role of Russia

    Trafficking in Transnistria: The Role of Russia by Kent Harrel SIS Honors Capstone Supervised by Professors Linda Lubrano and Elizabeth Anderson Submitted to the School of International Service American University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with General University Honors Bachelor of Arts Degree May 2009 Abstract After declaring de facto independence from the Republic of Moldova in 1992, the breakaway region of Transnistria became increasingly isolated, and has emerged as a hotspot for weapons and human trafficking. Working from a Realist paradigm, this project assesses the extent to which the Russian government and military abet trafficking in Transnistria, and the way in which Russia uses trafficking as a means to adversely affect Moldova’s designs of broader integration within European spheres. This project proves necessary because the existing scholarship on the topic of Transnistrian trafficking failed to focus on the role of the Russian government and military, and in turn did not account for the ways in which trafficking hinders Moldova’s national interests. The research project utilizes sources such as trafficking policy centers, first-hand accounts, trade agreements, non-governmental organizations, and government documents. A review of the literature employs the use of secondary sources such as scholarly and newspaper articles. In short, this project develops a more comprehensive understanding of Russia’s role in Moldovan affairs and attempts to add a significant work to the existing literature.
  • Bout, Viktor Et Al. S1 Indictment

    Bout, Viktor Et Al. S1 Indictment

    United States Attorney Southern District of New York FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FEBRUARY 17, 2010 YUSILL SCRIBNER, REBEKAH CARMICHAEL, JANICE OH PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE (212) 637-2600 DEA PAUL KNIERIM OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS (202) 307-8244 U.S. ANNOUNCES NEW INDICTMENT AGAINST INTERNATIONAL ARMS DEALER VIKTOR BOUT AND AMERICAN CO-CONSPIRATOR FOR MONEY LAUNDERING, WIRE FRAUD, AND CONSPIRACY PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and MICHELE M. LEONHART, the Acting Administrator of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA"), announced today the unsealing of an Indictment against international arms dealer VIKTOR BOUT, a/k/a "Boris," a/k/a "Victor Anatoliyevich Bout," a/k/a "Victor But," a/k/a "Viktor Budd," a/k/a "Viktor Butt," a/k/a "Viktor Bulakin," a/k/a "Vadim Markovich Aminov," and his associate RICHARD AMMAR CHICHAKLI, a/k/a "Robert Cunning," a/k/a "Raman Cedorov," for allegedly conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA") stemming from their efforts to purchase two aircraft from companies located in the United States, in violation of economic sanctions which prohibited such financial transactions. The Indictment unsealed today also charges BOUT and CHICHAKLI with money laundering conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, and six separate counts of wire fraud, in connection with these financial transactions. BOUT has been in custody in Thailand since March 6, 2008. Since BOUT's arrest, the United States has been actively pursuing his extradition from Thailand on a separate set of U.S. charges. Those charges allege that BOUT conspired to sell millions of dollars worth of weapons to the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (the "FARC") -- a designated foreign terrorist organization based in Colombia -- to be used to kill Americans in Colombia.
  • GATTACA Written and Directed by Andrew Niccol ABOUT THE

    GATTACA Written and Directed by Andrew Niccol ABOUT THE

    Article on Gattaca by Mark Freeman Area of Study 1 & 2 Theme: Future worlds GATTACA Written and directed by Andrew Niccol Article by Mark Freeman ABOUT THE DIRECTOR Andrew Niccol, a screenwriter and director, was born in New Zealand and moved to England at the age of 21 to direct commercials. He has written and directed Gattaca, Simone and Lord of War as well as earning an Academy Award nomination for his screenplay for The Truman Show. OVERVIEW In recent years, scientific research has unearthed a greater understanding of our genetic make-up – the lottery that determines our appearance and physical capabilities. The means by which we inherit specific traits from our parents, our genes are like a blueprint of our future, determining our predisposition for specific talents or particular illnesses. Concurrent with this understanding of genetics have come successful attempts in cloning, and, more recently, the ethical debate over stem cell research to combat a range of physical maladies. Identification and eradication of rogue genes (those that could ultimately cause malfunction at birth or later in a person’s life) is a very real possibility with the developing exploration in genetic research. In your own DNA, you already carry the genetic code which will cause your physical development in your teens, your predisposition to weight gain in your twenties, your hair loss in your thirties, early menopause in your forties, the arthritis you develop in your fifties, your death from cancer in your seventies. It’s an imposing thought to consider the map of our histories, our futures, in terms of our genetic code.
  • Presumption of Innocence: Procedural Rights in Criminal Proceedings Social Fieldwork Research (FRANET)

    Presumption of Innocence: Procedural Rights in Criminal Proceedings Social Fieldwork Research (FRANET)

    Presumption of Innocence: procedural rights in criminal proceedings Social Fieldwork Research (FRANET) Country: GERMANY Contractor’s name: Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte e.V. Authors: Thorben Bredow, Lisa Fischer Reviewer: Petra Follmar-Otto Date: 27 May 2020 (Revised version: 20 August 2020; second revision: 28 August 2020) DISCLAIMER: This document was commissioned under contract as background material for a comparative analysis by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the project ‘Presumption of Innocence’. The information and views contained in the document do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA. The document is made publicly available for transparency and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion. Table of Contents PART A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 1 PART B. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 B.1 PREPARATION OF FIELDWORK ........................................................................................... 4 B.2 IDENTIFICATION AND RECRUITMENT OF PARTICIPANTS ................................................... 4 B.3 SAMPLE AND DESCRIPTION OF FIELDWORK ...................................................................... 5 B.4 DATA ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................
  • Gorinski2018.Pdf

    Gorinski2018.Pdf

    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Automatic Movie Analysis and Summarisation Philip John Gorinski I V N E R U S E I T H Y T O H F G E R D I N B U Doctor of Philosophy Institute for Language, Cognition and Computation School of Informatics University of Edinburgh 2017 Abstract Automatic movie analysis is the task of employing Machine Learning methods to the field of screenplays, movie scripts, and motion pictures to facilitate or enable vari- ous tasks throughout the entirety of a movie’s life-cycle. From helping with making informed decisions about a new movie script with respect to aspects such as its origi- nality, similarity to other movies, or even commercial viability, all the way to offering consumers new and interesting ways of viewing the final movie, many stages in the life-cycle of a movie stand to benefit from Machine Learning techniques that promise to reduce human effort, time, or both.
  • Lost in the Compromise: Free Speech, Criminal Justice, and Attorney Pretrial Publicity

    Lost in the Compromise: Free Speech, Criminal Justice, and Attorney Pretrial Publicity

    LOST IN THE COMPROMISE: FREE SPEECH, CRIMINAL JUSTICE, AND ATTORNEY PRETRIAL PUBLICITY Margaret Tarkington* INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1874 I. PREVIOUS APPROACHES ...................................................... 1878 A. The Supreme Court and Attorney Pretrial Publicity ......................................................... 1878 B. The Compromise Between Fair Trials and the First Amendment ................................................... 1881 1. The Model Rules and the ABA ............................ 1881 2. Applying In-Court Restrictions to Extrajudicial Speech ............................................. 1883 3. Freedman and Starwood’s Non-Compromise ...... 1884 C. The First Amendment Strongly Protects Attorney Pretrial Publicity .......................................... 1884 D. Structural Signaling ..................................................... 1885 E. Ignoring the First Amendment Problem ...................... 1886 II. THE ACCESS-TO-JUSTICE THEORY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT ....................................................................... 1887 III. REPRESENTATION IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM .................................................................. 1890 A. Heightened Constitutional Significance of Life and Liberty ....................................................... 1891 B. Obligations to Undertake and Continue the Representation ............................................................. 1892 C. Duty Not to Disclose Information
  • Dissemination of Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter and Its Countermeasures

    Dissemination of Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter and Its Countermeasures

    Dissertation Dissemination of Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter and Its Countermeasures Christine Chen This document was submitted as a dissertation in March 2021 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Luke Matthews (Chair), Sarah Nowak and Jeremy Miles. The external reader was Jennifer Golbeck. This dissertation was generously supported by the Anne and James Rothenberg Dissertation Award. PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL For more information on this publication, visit http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSDA1332-1.html Published 2021 by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. is a registered trademarK Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademarK(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is reQuired from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help maKe communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND MaKe a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Abstract Outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases have continued to affect many parts of the United States.
  • THE ASSETS FREEZE LIST Last Updated on 23 December 2013

    THE ASSETS FREEZE LIST Last Updated on 23 December 2013

    THE ASSETS FREEZE LIST Last updated on 23 December 2013 LAST FIRST ALIAS DATE OF PASSPORT DESIGNATION/ NAME NAME BIRTH/ /IDENTIFYING JUSTIFICATION PLACE INFORMATION OF BIRTH BOUT Viktor BUTT, 13 JAN 21N0532664 Businessman, dealer and Anatolje BONT, 1967 29N0006765 transporter of weapons and vitch minerals. Arms dealer in BUTTE, (13 JAN 21N0557148 1970) contravention of UNSC BOUTOV, 44N3570350 resolution 1343. Supported SERGITOV former President Taylor’s Vitali Currently in regime in effort to federal custody in destabilize Sierra Leone the United States and gain illicit access to of America diamonds. pending trial. CHICHAK Richard Ammar M. 29 March SSN: 405 41 5342 A Syrian-born US citizen LI Ammar Chichakli 1959 or 467 79 1065 who has been an employee/ associate of Viktor Bout for POB: Syria Address: 225 about a decade. The UN Syracuse Place, identified Chichakli as Citizenship Richardson, Texas Viktor Bout’s Chief : US 75081, USA Financial Manager and, therefore, as one who acts 811 South Central at Bout’s direction. His Expressway own resume details his senior positions with several Bout-controlled Suite 210 Richardson, Texas companies. A certified 75080, USA public accountant and certified fraud examiner with more than 12 years of experience, plays a significant role in assisting 51 Churchill Ave. Jehad 10 July Bout in setting up and Reservoir VIC ALMUSTAFA 1967 managing a number of his 3073 key firms and moving Australia Jehad Deirazzor, money (both for acquisition ALMUSARA Syria of assets and reparation of Syrian passport # profits). In media Jhad 002680351 (issued interviews, reportedly has ALMUSTASA 25 April 2007, held himself out as expires 24 April spokesperson for Viktor 2013) Bout and his network.
  • PDF Download

    PDF Download

    CONTENTS Preface xxiii Acknowledgments xxvii CHAPTER ONE THE “IDEAL” ORGANIZATION 1 How organizations are supposed to run (in theory) Chapter Objectives 1 Key Terms 1 Introduction 2 Max Weber and Bureaucracy 2 Characteristics of Bureaucracy 3 Law in the Real World: The Blockbuster Movie 6 Jobs vs. Careers 7 Law in the Real World: Steve Jobs and Apple, Inc. 8 Professional Associations and Organizations 9 Control of Workers and Management Styles 10 McDonaldization of Organizations 12 Law in the Real World: Southwest Airlines 14 Labor Markets 15 Laws and Regulation in Organizations 16 Law in the Real World: California’s SB 1342 17 Summary 18 Case Study: Keeping Employees Happy: Twitter® 19 Glossary 21 References and Suggested Readings 23 ix Contents CHAPTER TWO HOW ORGANIZATIONS REALLY RUN 25 What can go wrong that can lead to white collar or corporate crime Chapter Objectives 25 Key Terms 25 Introduction 26 Defining Malfeasance and White Collar Crime 27 Fear and Greed 28 Iron Cage of Bureaucracy 29 Chain of Command Issues 31 Innovation 32 Law in the Real World: Challenger Shuttle Disaster 32 Bounded Rationality 33 Ceremonial Evaluations 34 Leadership Gone Haywire: The Autocrat and Micromanager 35 Alienated Workers 36 Law in the Real World: The U.S. Postal Strike, 1970 37 Irrationality of McDonaldization 39 Gender Politics 40 Whistleblowers 40 Law in the Real World: Jeffrey Wigand and Big Tobacco 42 Unforeseen Disasters 44 Law in the Real World: Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) Bankruptcy 46 Corporate Violence 47 Organizational Death 48 Summary 49 Case Study: What Happens in Hollywood (and New York) Doesn’t Necessarily Stay in Hollywood: The Weinstein Scandal 50 Glossary 55 References and Suggested Readings 57 x Contents CHAPTER THREE WHAT YOU KNOW VS.
  • Bout Indictment

    Bout Indictment

    United States Attorney Southern District of New York FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE May 6, 2008 YUSILL SCRIBNER, REBEKAH CARMICHAEL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE (212) 637-2600 DEA GARRISON COURTNEY OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS (202) 307-7977 U.S. ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL ARMS DEALER FOR CONSPIRACY TO KILL AMERICANS AND RELATED TERRORISM CHARGES MICHAEL J. GARCIA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and MICHELE M. LEONHART, the Acting Administrator of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA"), announced today the unsealing of an Indictment against international arms dealer VIKTOR BOUT, a/k/a "Boris," a/k/a "Victor Anatoliyevich Bout," a/k/a "Victor But," a/k/a "Viktor Budd," a/k/a "Viktor Butt," a/k/a "Viktor Bulakin," a/k/a "Vadim Markovich Aminov," for, among other things, conspiring to sell millions of dollars worth of weapons to the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (the "FARC") -- a designated foreign terrorist organization based in Colombia -- to be used to kill Americans in Colombia. BOUT was arrested by Thai authorities on a provisional arrest warrant on April 9, 2008, based on a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, charging conspiracy to provide material support or resources to a designated foreign terrorist organization. BOUT has been in custody in Thailand since March 6, 2008. According to the Indictment unsealed today in Manhattan federal court: BOUT, an international weapons trafficker since the 1990s, has carried out his weapons-trafficking business by assembling a fleet of cargo airplanes capable of transporting weapons and military equipment to various parts of the world, including Africa, South America and the Middle East.
  • Innocent Until Proven Guilty?

    Innocent Until Proven Guilty?

    Innocent until proven guilty? The presentation of suspects in criminal proceedings Innocent until proven guilty? About Fair Trials Fair Trials is a global criminal justice watchdog with offices in London, Brussels and Washington, D.C., focused on improving the right to a fair trial in accordance with international standards. Fair Trials’ work is premised on the belief that fair trials are In Europe, Fair Trials coordinate the Legal Experts one of the cornerstones of a just society: they prevent lives Advisory Panel (LEAP) – the leading criminal justice from being ruined by miscarriages of justice and make network in Europe consisting of over 200 criminal defence societies safer by contributing to justice systems that law firms, academic institutions and civil society maintain public trust. Although universally recognised in organisations. More information about this network and its principle, in practice the basic human right to a fair trial is work on the right to a fair trial in Europe can be found at: being routinely abused. www.fairtrials.org/legal-experts-advisory-panel. @fairtrials @fairtrials Fair Trials fairtrials.org Suspects in Restraints This report is produced as part of the project “The Importance of Appearances: How Suspects and Accused Persons are Presented in the Courtroom, in Public and in the Media”, coordinated by the Hungarian Helsinki Committee (the “Project”) with partners Aditus Foundation (Malta), Fair Trials, Human Right House, Zagreb (Croatia), Mérték (Hungary), Rights International Spain, and the University of Vienna. Contact: Laure Baudrihaye-Gérard Alex Mik Senior Lawyer (Europe) Campaigns & Networks Director +32 (0)2 894 99 55 +32 (0)2 895 59 42 [email protected] [email protected] Illustrations: Darya Novatorova With thanks to Hogan Lovells, our pro bono partner, without whose time, expertise, Project coordinated by global network of offices and commitment, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee the global survey of law and practice in this report would not have been possible.