DOCSLIB.ORG

Risky Biomass Business

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Risky Biomass Business Risky Biomass Business The reputational and financial risks of investing in forest biomass energy Investors in electricity generated from n Biomass energy provides poor value for burning forest wood are facing increasing money compared to low-carbon forms reputational risks, as well as facing serious of renewable energy such as wind and financial risks. solar power - a trend that will only accel- Reputational risks stem from the growing erate as the cost of wind and solar power awareness and body of evidence showing continues to fall, unlike that of biomass that forest biomass is far from being a low energy; carbon or even carbon neutral energy n Bioenergy plants are highly dependent source. The climate impacts of forest of public renewable energy subsidies and biomass energy are in many cases as bad thus vulnerable to any changes in the as those of coal (for the same amount of opinion of policy makers and to reviews energy generated). Furthermore, biomass of legislation; energy is linked to accelerating forest and n biodiversity destruction, as well as to air Even with subsidies in place, several large pollution affecting public health. biomass power projects have resulted in substantial financial losses for energy Reputational risks can translate into finan- companies; cial risks given the high level of depend- ence of this form of energy on public n ‘State of the art’ or ‘advanced’, high- subsidies. Failure to fully disclose environ- efficiency biomass projects carry a mental, social and governance (ESG) risks higher risk of technical failure; in portfolios exposes financial institutions n Processing and burning woodchips and to regulatory risk. Furthermore, there are pellets for energy are associated with a additional financial risks: high risk of fires and explosions. Briefing Document May 2019 Contacts: Almuth Ernsting, [email protected] Merel van der Mark, [email protected] Reputational risks Energy from forest biomass1 is increas- In 2018, 136 NGOs signed an Open Letter ingly recognised as a high-carbon denouncing the ‘Biomass Delusion’. source of energy, linked to forest and The signatory NGOs warn that energy biodiversity destruction and threats from forest biomass harms the climate, to public health. In January 2018, an harms forests, harms people, and harms Open Letter signed by 800 scien- the transition to clean energy. They “call tists was submitted to the European on governments, financiers, compa- Parliament, stating: “Even if forests are nies and civil society to avoid allowed to regrow, using wood deliber- expansion of the forest ately harvested for burning will increase biomass-based energy carbon in the atmosphere and warming industry and move away for decades to centuries ... even when from its use”. wood replaces coal, oil or natural gas. The reasons are fundamental and occur As the negative impacts of regardless of whether forest manage- biomass energy become clearer ment is ‘sustainable.’” and more widespread, opposition and resistance to projects from local A subsequent peer-reviewed study communities and campaign groups found that even bioenergy sourced from is mounting in several countries and burning forest residues results in such a regions such as in various regions high carbon debt that it cannot contribute in the Netherlands, in Gardanne in to the goal of the Paris Agreement to limit Southern France, across the UK and in warming to 1.5 or even 2 degrees. the Southern United States. Financial risks 1. Poor value for money Generating electricity from biomass is trends for bioenergy. It also states that The modelling in this study indicates more expensive than generating it from the feedstock costs account for 20-50% that in 2020, when power plant emis- other forms of renewable energy. of the cost of electricity from biomass, sions from burning biomass and their with the cheapest source being agricul- associated carbon costs are accurately A IRENA report published in January tural residues. Wood prices are strongly accounted for, biomass is uneconom- 2018 found that the average global affected by demand, hence they cannot ical relative to wind and solar alterna- levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) for be expected to fall if bioenergy from tives2. Even in scenarios that do not fully bioenergy projects commissioned in forest wood continues to increase – account for biomass carbon emissions, 2017 was $0.07/kWh, but up to $0.08/ particularly since the energy sector the total economic cost of biomass is kWh in Europe and North America. competes with the pulp and paper and comparable to or higher than that of Lower costs were associated with other industries for the same wood onshore wind and solar. The analysis poorer environmental standards. By resources. also finds that as their costs continue to comparison, the average LCOE of new fall, in 2025 wind and solar are likely to onshore wind commissioned in 2017 A 2016 study by Vivid Economics, be the least costly way to ensure the UK was $0.06/kWh. For solar PV in at least commissioned by the Natural Resources meets its energy needs. five countries, an LCOE of $0.03/kWh Defense Council, looked at the was reported. In 2016 and 2017, auction economics of coal-to-biomass conver- results for offshore wind and concen- sions in the UK context, widely consid- 1 For the purpose of this briefing, the term ‘forests trated solar power showed that an LCOE ered cheaper than dedicated biomass biomass’ refers to wood sourced from either or both as low as $0.06/kWh would be achieved power stations or cogeneration plants. forest ecosystems or industrial tree plantations. This by 2020. It found that: “wind and solar are likely reflects the reality that the same installations may source a mixture of wood from both sources. It does to be the lowest-cost technologies to The report further shows significant not in any way imply that the organisations publishing ensure the reliability of U.K. electricity the briefing agree with classifying industrial tree and ongoing falls in the cost of wind supply in the period 2020 to 2025”. plantations as forests. and solar power, with no such recent 2 See figure 2 in the Vivid Economics 2016 study 2. Dependence on Projects which have resulted in financial losses subsidies despite subsidies O u r o r g a n i s a t i o n s c o u l d fi n d n o ev i d e nce n In Rotterdam, in the Netherlands, Uniper was awarded renewable energy subsidies of 930 of any power station, combined heat million € in 2016 for co-firing wood pellets in its new Maasvlakte 3 coal power station opened and power plant or larger biomass heat the year before. In the same year, the book value of this power plant was written down from plant in the world that is reliant on forest 1,5 billion to just 700 million €. This was well in advance of the Dutch government’s decision biomass and operates without subsi- to phase-out coal-fired power plants by the end of 2029. In 2019 technical upgrades to permit dies (including direct subsidies, indirect 30% co-firing were finally completed, but the Dutch government has already announced that subsidies paid via electricity bills, and there won’t be any new subsidies after 2026. Under these conditions, the power plant will preferential loans from publicly funded hardly meet its targeted investment return and will inevitably be further depreciated. or owned bodies). n A 2018 study by researchers of the Georgia Institute of Technology, commissioned by the As the negative impacts of energy from Natural Resources Defense Council looked at Dominion Power’s full conversion of three coal forest biomass are becoming more power stations to biomass in Virginia and the conversion to biomass co-firing of a fourth widely known, pressure on policy- station. It found that the cost of producing one MWh of electricity from biomass across the makers is increasing to shift subsidies four plants was 88% more expensive than electricity generated from other sources, including towards lower-carbon forms of renew- solar and wind power. A Dominion spokesperson had stated that it made sense to operate the able energy. This was well exemplified plants with biomass due to tax credits and renewable energy credits. In August 2018, Dominion in the Belgian region of Flanders where quietly mothballed one of the converted power stations because it could no longer receive disagreements over biomass sustain- tax credits and thus keep it financially viable. The company also decided to close two other ability and public criticism of high dedicated biomass plants, in Virginia and Minnesota. subsidies stopped the operation of the large MaxGreen power station, which n In the UK, Drax Group plc received £729 million in renewable energy subsidies during 2017 had been converted to biomass3, and for burning biomass in its three converted coal power station units. Nonetheless, it incurred cancelled the plans to build another. a net loss of £151 million, of which £10 million were due to a fire. In the first half of 2018, Drax recorded a loss of £4 million (after taxes) , despite receiving subsidies at a similar rate as during Such a policy shift could well mirror the 2017. drastic reduction and then withdrawal of subsidies for heat and power from palm oil burning: in the Netherlands, 15.9 PJ of bioliquids, most of it palm oil, Examples of technical failures of ‘state of the art’ or were co-fired in coal power stations in ‘advanced’ biomass energy projects 2006, and this was cut to 0.6 PJ in 2007 (before ceasing altogether), due to n In Gardanne, France, E.On started converting the Province 4 coal power station to biomass in subsidies being first drastically reduced 2015, made possible by a 70 million € annual government subsidy guaranteed for 20 years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electrical Modeling of a Thermal Power Station
    Electrical Modeling of a Thermal Power Station Reinhard Kaisinger Degree project in Electric Power Systems Second Level Stockholm, Sweden 2011 XR-EE-ES 2011:010 ELECTRICAL MODELING OF A THERMAL POWER STATION Reinhard Kaisinger Masters’ Degree Project Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden 2011 XR-EE-ES 2011:010 Table of Contents Page ABSTRACT V SAMMANFATTNING VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENT VII ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT VIII 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BACKGROUND 3 2.1 Facilities in a Thermal Power Plant 3 2.2 Thermal Power Plant Operation 4 2.2.1 Fuel and Combustion 4 2.2.2 Rankine Cycle 4 2.3 Thermal Power Plant Control 6 2.3.1 Turbine Governor 7 2.4 Amagerværket Block 1 7 2.5 Frequency Control 9 2.5.1 Frequency Control in the ENTSO-E RG Continental Europe Power System 9 2.5.2 Frequency Control in the ENTSO-E RG Nordic Power System 10 2.5.3 Decentralized Frequency Control Action 11 2.5.4 Centralized Frequency Control Action 12 3 MODELING 14 3.1 Modeling and Simulation Software 14 3.1.1 Acausality 14 3.1.2 Differential-Algebraic Equations 15 3.1.3 The ObjectStab Library 15 3.1.4 The ThermoPower Library 16 3.2 Connectors 16 3.3 Synchronous Generator 17 3.4 Steam Turbine 22 3.5 Control Valves 23 3.6 Boiler, Re-heater and Condenser 23 3.7 Overall Steam Cycle 23 3.8 Excitation System and Power System Stabilizer 24 3.9 Turbine Governor 25 3.10 Turbine-Generator Shaft 26 3.11 Overall Model 26 3.12 Boundary Conditions 27 3.13 Simplifications within the Model 28 3.13.1 Steam Cycle 28 3.13.2 Governor 28 3.13.3 Valves and Valve Characteristics 29 3.13.4
    [Show full text]
  • DESIGN of a WATER TOWER ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Graduate School University of Missouri
    DESIGN OF A WATER TOWER ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate School University of Missouri - Columbia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by SAGAR KISHOR GIRI Dr. Noah Manring, Thesis Supervisor MAY 2013 The undersigned, appointed by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined he thesis entitled DESIGN OF A WATER TOWER ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM presented by SAGAR KISHOR GIRI a candidate for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE and hereby certify that in their opinion it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. Noah Manring Dr. Roger Fales Dr. Robert O`Connell ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my appreciation to my thesis advisor, Dr. Noah Manring, for his constant guidance, advice and motivation to overcome any and all obstacles faced while conducting this research and support throughout my degree program without which I could not have completed my master’s degree. Furthermore, I extend my appreciation to Dr. Roger Fales and Dr. Robert O`Connell for serving on my thesis committee. I also would like to express my gratitude to all the students, professors and staff of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department for all the support and helping me to complete my master’s degree successfully and creating an exceptional environment in which to work and study. Finally, last, but of course not the least, I would like to thank my parents, my sister and my friends for their continuous support and encouragement to complete my program, research and thesis. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ ii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Scale Implementation of RES and Storage in an Island Energy System
    inventions Article Full-Scale Implementation of RES and Storage in an Island Energy System Konstantinos Fiorentzis , Yiannis Katsigiannis and Emmanuel Karapidakis * Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, GR-71004 Heraklion, Greece; kfi[email protected] (K.F.); [email protected] (Y.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-2810-379-889 Received: 10 September 2020; Accepted: 29 October 2020; Published: 30 October 2020 Abstract: The field of energy, specifically renewable energy sources (RES), is considered vital for a sustainable society, a fact that is clearly defined by the European Green Deal. It will convert the old, conventional economy into a new, sustainable economy that is environmentally sound, economically viable, and socially responsible. Therefore, there is a need for quick actions by everyone who wants to move toward energy-efficient development and new environmentally friendly behavior. This can be achieved by setting specific guidelines of how to proceed, where to start, and what knowledge is needed to implement such plans and initiatives. This paper seeks to contribute to this very important issue by appraising the ability of full-scale implementation of RES combined with energy storage in an island power system. The Greek island power system of Astypalaia is used as a case study where a battery energy storage system (BESS), along with wind turbines (WTs), is examined to be installed as part of a hybrid power plant (HPP). The simulation’s results showed that the utilization of HPP can significantly increase RES penetration in parallel with remarkable fuel cost savings. Finally, the fast response of BESS can enhance the stability of the system in the case of disturbances.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Power Generation and Distribution
    ATP 3-34.45 MCRP 3-40D.17 ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION JULY 2018 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This publication supersedes TM 3-34.45/MCRP 3-40D.17, 13 August 2013. Headquarters, Department of the Army Foreword This publication has been prepared under our direction for use by our respective commands and other commands as appropriate. ROBERT F. WHITTLE, JR. ROBERT S. WALSH Brigadier General, USA Lieutenant General, USMC Commandant Deputy Commandant for U.S. Army Engineer School Combat Development and Integration This publication is available at the Army Publishing Directorate site (https://armypubs.army.mil) and the Central Army Registry site (https://atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/dashboard). *ATP 3-34.45 MCRP 3-40D.17 Army Techniques Publication Headquarters No. 3-34.45 Department of the Army Washington, DC, 6 July 2018 Marine Corps Reference Publication Headquarters No. 3-40D.17 Marine Corps Combat Development Command Department of the Navy Headquarters, United States Marine Corps Washington, DC, 6 July 2018 Electric Power Generation and Distribution Contents Page PREFACE.................................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... v Chapter 1 ELECTRICAL POWER ............................................................................................. 1-1 Electrical Power Support to Military Operations
    [Show full text]
  • Md Tanvirul Kabir Chowdhury Implementation of Interlocking Scheme for Bus Bar and Arc Protection Using Iec 61850
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University MD TANVIRUL KABIR CHOWDHURY IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERLOCKING SCHEME FOR BUS BAR AND ARC PROTECTION USING IEC 61850 Master of Science Thesis Examiner: Professor Sami Repo Examiner and topic approved by the Faculty Council of Computing and Electrical Engineering on 7th Octo- ber 2015 i ABSTRACT MD TANVIRUL KABIR CHOWDHURY: IMPLEMENTATION OF INTER- LOCKING SCHEME FOR BUS BAR AND ARC PROTECTION USING IEC 61850 Tampere University of technology Master of Science Thesis, 56 pages November 2017 Master’s Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering Major: Smart Grid Examiner: Professor Sami Repo Keywords: protection scheme, bus bar, arc protection, IEC 61850, GOOSE The main scope of the thesis is to focus on bus bar protection in the medium voltage level. It is important for designing the protection setup according to the intended protection scheme, planning for circumvent the arc fault and set up the protecting device in a required manner. In this thesis there are different protection schemes for the bus bar have studied. The arc incident has discussed and put emphasis on the process of arc development. For mitigating the arc faults and other unwanted fault incident, it is important to have a co-ordination between the protecting devices. IEC 61850 is an important protocol of communication that has discussed from the basic idea. In the thesis it has given effort on the implementation of busbar protection scheme with the protection devices in the substation. Those devices are communi- cating with each other for exchanging the GOOSE message using IEC 61850.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing with Fire an Assessment of Company Plans to Burn Biomass in EU Coal Power Stations an ASSESSMENT of PLANS to BURN BIOMASS in EU COAL POWER STATIONS
    Playing With Fire An assessment of company plans to burn biomass in EU coal power stations Executive summary Supported by EU legislation, biomass (mostly wood in the form of pellets or chips) is increasingly used as a fuel to generate electricity, including in a number of large former coal power plants. This practice continues despite scientific consensus that burning biomass instead of coal in power stations risks accelerating climate change. This report assesses the possible growth in biomass burning across Europe as a result of a fleet of planned coal-to-biomass power plant conversions. We map every project and estimate the scale of the threat to global forests. Unsustainable These expansion plans are being driven by some of Europe’s major utilities, including RWE and Vattenfall. If European coal companies are allowed to complete these conversions, it would double global demand for wood pellets. To fuel these planned biomass power plants, every single year suppliers would need to cut down the equivalent of most of the forest in the Netherlands, or half of Germany’s Black Forest. Expensive These projects all require large public subsidy, and yet we find they would produce just 2% of the EU’s electricity. In comparison, every year Europe adds an equivalent amount of new wind and solar capacity - much of it now effectively subsidy-free. Even In the UK - which pioneered large coal-to-biomass conversions - the government now states that carbon savings from these projects are "low or nonexistent" and that the "cost of any savings is high" when compared to wind and solar.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Storage in Grids with High Penetration of Variable Generation
    Energy Storage in Grids with High Penetration of Variable Generation Grid-level energy storage is likely to dominate the conversation in the power industry in the coming years, just like renewable energy did in the past 2 decades. This report targets investors, developers, utility planners, power sector policy makers, and readers who wish to understand the role energy storage is likely to play in the smart grid of the future. For developing countries, the report provides an introduction to the necessary technical background on energy storage, the role it is likely to play as penetration of renewable energy increases in the grid, and the policy prescriptions to realize the wide range of benefits of energy storage. About the Asian Development Bank ADB’s vision is an Asia and Pacific region free of poverty. Its mission is to help its developing member countries reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their people. Despite the region’s many successes, it remains home to a large share of the world’s poor. ADB is committed to reducing poverty through inclusive economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regional integration. Based in Manila, ADB is owned by 67 members, including 48 from the region. Its main instruments for helping its developing member countries are policy dialogue, loans, equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance. ENERGY STORAGE IN GRIDS WITH HIGH PENETRATION OF VARIABLE GENERATION ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila. Philippines ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK www.adb.org ENERGY STORAGE IN GRIDS WITH HIGH PENETRATION OF VARIABLE GENERATION FEBRUARY 2017 Pramod Jain ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2017 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Cogeneration
    Ch-07.qxd 2/23/2005 11:24 AM Page 155 7. COGENERATION Syllabus Cogeneration: Definition, Need, Application, Advantages, Classification, Saving potentials 7.1 Need for Cogeneration Thermal power plants are a major source of electricity supply in India. The conventional method of power generation and supply to the customer is wasteful in the sense that only about a third of the primary energy fed into the power plant is actually made available to the user in the form of electricity (Figure 7.1). In conventional power plant, efficiency is only 35% and remaining 65% of energy is lost. The major source of loss in the conversion process is the heat rejected to the surrounding water or air due to the inherent constraints of the different thermodynamic cycles employed in power generation. Also further losses of around 10–15% are associated with the transmission and distribution of electricity in the electrical grid. Figure 7.1 BALANCE IN TYPICAL COAL FIRED POWER STATION For an Input Energy of 100 Giga Joules (GJ) 7.2 Principle of Cogeneration Cogeneration or Combined Heat and Power (CHP) is defined as the sequential generation of two different forms of useful energy from a single primary energy source, typically mechanical energy and thermal energy. Mechanical energy may be used either to drive an alternator for pro- ducing electricity, or rotating equipment such as motor, compressor, pump or fan for delivering Bureau of Energy Efficiency 155 Ch-07.qxd 2/23/2005 11:24 AM Page 156 7. Cogeneration various services. Thermal energy can be used either for direct process applications or for indi- rectly producing steam, hot water, hot air for dryer or chilled water for process cooling.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Power System Operation Assumptions
    3. Power System Operation Assumptions This section describes the assumptions pertaining to the North American electric power system as represented in EPA Base Case v.5.13. 3.1 Model Regions EPA Base Case v.5.13 models the US power sector in the contiguous 48 states and the District of Columbia and the Canadian power sector in the 10 provinces (with Newfoundland and Labrador represented as two regions on the electricity network even though politically they constitute a single province6) as an integrated network. There are 64 IPM model regions covering the US 48 states and District of Columbia. The IPM model regions are approximately consistent with the configuration of the NERC assessment regions in the NERC Long-Term Reliability Assessments. These IPM model regions reflect the administrative structure of regional transmission organizations (RTOs) and independent system operators (ISOs). Further disaggregation of the NERC assessment regions and RTOs allows a more accurate characterization of the operation of the US power markets by providing the ability to represent transmission bottlenecks across RTOs and ISOs, as well as key transmission limits within them. The IPM regions also provide disaggregation of the regions of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) to provide for a more accurate correspondence with the demand projections of the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). Notable disaggregations are further described below: NERC assessment regions MISO and PJM cover the areas of the corresponding RTOs and are designed to better represent transmission limits and dispatch in each area. In IPM, the MISO area is disaggregated into 9 IPM regions and the PJM assessment area is disaggregated into 9 IPM regions, where the IPM regions are selected to represent planning areas within each RTO and/or areas with internal transmission limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Heat and Power Systems (PDF)
    APRIL 2013 NRDC ISSUE papeR IP:13-04-B Combined Heat and Power Systems: Improving the Energy Efficiency of Our Manufacturing Plants, Buildings, and Other Facilities AUTHORS Vignesh Gowrishankar Christina Angelides Hannah Druckenmiller Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge John Cuttica and Clifford Haefke at the Midwest Clean Energy Application Center, Katrina Pielli at the U.S. Department of Energy, and Dylan Sullivan at NRDC for valuable feedback and comments. About NRDC The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 1.4 million members and online activists. Since 1970, our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to protect the world’s natural resources, public health, and the environment. NRDC has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Livingston, and Beijing. Visit us at www.nrdc.org. NRDC’s policy publications aim to inform and influence solutions to the world’s most pressing environmental and public health issues. For additional policy content, visit our online policy portal at www.nrdc.org/policy. NRDC Director of Communications: Edwin Chen NRDC Deputy Director of Communications: Lisa Goffredi NRDC Policy Publications Director: Alex Kennaugh Lead Editor: Carlita Salazar Design and Production: www.suerossi.com Cover images: Reciprocating engine © Finley Buttes; Gas turbine at University of Illinois at Chicago © Vignesh Gowrishankar; CHP at BMW manufacturing plant © BMW Manufacturing Co. © 2013 Natural Resources Defense Council EXECUTIVE SUMMARY mproving the energy efficiency of our manufacturing facilities, buildings, and homes can help us meet our energy challenges affordably. It can save consumers Imoney on their energy bills, drive business competitiveness and economic growth and jobs, enhance grid reliability and flexibility, and help protect public health and the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 on Energy Systems Gas (GHG) Emissions
    7 Energy Systems Coordinating Lead Authors: Thomas Bruckner (Germany), Igor Alexeyevich Bashmakov (Russian Federation), Yacob Mulugetta (Ethiopia / UK) Lead Authors: Helena Chum (Brazil / USA), Angel De la Vega Navarro (Mexico), James Edmonds (USA), Andre Faaij (Netherlands), Bundit Fungtammasan (Thailand), Amit Garg (India), Edgar Hertwich (Austria / Norway), Damon Honnery (Australia), David Infield (UK), Mikiko Kainuma (Japan), Smail Khennas (Algeria / UK), Suduk Kim (Republic of Korea), Hassan Bashir Nimir (Sudan), Keywan Riahi (Austria), Neil Strachan (UK), Ryan Wiser (USA), Xiliang Zhang (China) Contributing Authors: Yumiko Asayama (Japan), Giovanni Baiocchi (UK / Italy), Francesco Cherubini (Italy / Norway), Anna Czajkowska (Poland / UK), Naim Darghouth (USA), James J. Dooley (USA), Thomas Gibon (France / Norway), Haruna Gujba (Ethiopia / Nigeria), Ben Hoen (USA), David de Jager (Netherlands), Jessica Jewell (IIASA / USA), Susanne Kadner (Germany), Son H. Kim (USA), Peter Larsen (USA), Axel Michaelowa (Germany / Switzerland), Andrew Mills (USA), Kanako Morita (Japan), Karsten Neuhoff (Germany), Ariel Macaspac Hernandez (Philippines / Germany), H-Holger Rogner (Germany), Joseph Salvatore (UK), Steffen Schlömer (Germany), Kristin Seyboth (USA), Christoph von Stechow (Germany), Jigeesha Upadhyay (India) Review Editors: Kirit Parikh (India), Jim Skea (UK) Chapter Science Assistant: Ariel Macaspac Hernandez (Philippines / Germany) 511 Energy Systems Chapter 7 This chapter should be cited as: Bruckner T., I. A. Bashmakov, Y. Mulugetta, H. Chum, A. de la Vega Navarro, J. Edmonds, A. Faaij, B. Fungtammasan, A. Garg, E. Hertwich, D. Honnery, D. Infield, M. Kainuma, S. Khennas, S. Kim, H. B. Nimir, K. Riahi, N. Strachan, R. Wiser, and X. Zhang, 2014: Energy Systems. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of a Wind Turbine Project in the Town of Florida, MA
    Construction of a Wind Turbine Project in the Town of Florida, MA A Major Qualifying Project Submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Submitted by: Matthew Burger Sean Colella Sean Quinlivan Joel Rousseau Sponsoring Agency: Worcester Polytechnic Institute Submitted To: Project Advisor: Tahar El-Korchi Date: March 1, 2007 windmqp@ wpi.edu Abstract This Major Qualifying Project (MQP) presents recommendations for the design and construction of a feasible 7.5 mega Watt (1.5 mW/turbine) wind turbine power generation plant in the town of Florida, MA. This project addresses the following topics and issues: permitting, land acquisition, turbine foundation design and construction, access road design and construction, operations and maintenance building design, substation design, soil analysis and retaining wall design, power output to the national grid, a detailed cost estimate and environmental conservation issues. 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 12 1.1 History of Wind Power ..................................................................................... 16 1.2 Wind Turbine Technology................................................................................ 17 1.3 World Wide Wind Energy................................................................................ 19 1.4 Massachusetts Wind Power .............................................................................
    [Show full text]