DOCSLIB.ORG

The Politics of Sympathy: German Turcophilism and the Ottoman Empire in the Age of the Mass Media 1871-1914

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE POLITICS OF SYMPATHY: GERMAN TURCOPHILISM AND THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE IN THE AGE OF THE MASS MEDIA 1871-1914 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By S. Chase Gummer, M. A. Washington, DC December 9, 2010 Copyright 2010 by S. Chase Gummer All Rights Reserved ii THE POLITICS OF SYMPATHY: GERMAN TURCOPHILISM AND THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE IN THE AGE OF THE MASS MEDIA 1871-1914 S. Chase Gummer, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Roger Chickering, PhD. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the sources of sympathy for the Ottoman Empire–what contemporaries called “turcophilism”—in Imperial Germany before World War I. It focuses on German journalists in the Ottoman Empire and the representation of Ottoman violence in the German public sphere. While the German government tried to influence news coverage coming from the Ottoman lands in times of crisis, most German newspapers with correspondents in the field attempted to provide their readers with timely information on current affairs with little regard for official “narratives” congenial to German diplomacy. iii Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………….1 Section I: Geopolitics and the News Chapter 1: The Promise of Partnership: The Geopolitics of German Turcophilism…………………………………………...…………………………………17 Chapter 2. State and Society in the Age of Public Opinion: The Liberalization of the Press and German Unification……………………………………………………………62 Chapter 3. The Globalization of News and the Political Economy of German Diplomacy in the Ottoman Empire……………………………………………………………….….107 Section II: Responses Chapter 4. The Great Eastern Crisis and the Emergence of German Turcophilism 1875- 1878……………………………………………………………………………………...153 Chapter 5. Massacre, Modernization, and War: Moral Hazard and the High-Tide of German Turcophilism 1885-1900……………………………………………………….187 Chapter 6. Revolution, Regeneration, and Defeat: The Waning of German Turcophilism 1902-1914………………………………………………………………………………..247 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….292 Appendix: Illustrations...………………………………………………………………...306 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………..309 iv “People need to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events.” — John Gray, Heresies: Against Progress and Other Illusions (2004) v Author’s Note: Naming things not only presents deep metaphysical problems in philosophy but also has practical intellectual implications for historians. Because this dissertation takes Imperial Germany and the Ottoman Empire as its subjects, I have chosen a hybrid terminology using the Anglicized “Constantinople” for the city of Istanbul, because it comes closest to the German usage of “Konstantinopel”, as well as other Anglicized versions of German names for cities of the Ottoman Empire. However, I conciously resist referring to the Ottoman Empire as Turkey or the Ottomans as Turks for reasons that are immediately understandable for Ottomanists yet still mystifying to many Western historians. Although Ottoman diplomats used “Constantinople”, “Turquie”, and “Sa Majesté Impériale le Sultan” in their international correspondence beginning in the nineteenth century, “Turkey”, the “Turkish Empire”, and the “Turks” are labels that imply a distinct Western perspective. Thus quotations appear around the terms anytime I am paraphrasing Germans. vi Introduction People who take up this eastern question take it up very violently indeed. Russophobia is nearly as incurable as hydrophobia. The correlated Turcophilism is one of the very strongest isms. Probably there are not very many who take up the Turkish cause, but those who do so take it up violently. It is amusing enough at times to listen to the talk of the smoking- rooms of the clubs. The Turk is the most gentlemanly fellow. There is no Bulgarian Christian who is worthy to lick his boots. Constantinople is the most delightful place in the world. (...) On the other hand, there is a parallel enthusiasm aroused against the Turks and in favor of the Russians.(...)They abhor the “unspeakable Turk.” They recognize the Russians as chivalrous crusaders. They long for the regeneration of the Christian races of Eastern Europe. They look forward to the revival of a Greek Empire at Constantinople. The general reflections which suggest themselves are that, with distinct schools of opinion so violently contrasted, it is extremely improbable that the country [Great Britain] will be dragged into war. There is then the suspicion that the main interest is chiefly confined to politicians, military men, and littérateurs, and that the general mass of the people, up to this point, are not vividly moved on the subject either in one way or the other. –London Society. “Turcophilism”, The New York Times, 15 July 1877 Throughout the nineteenth century, policies and opinions that championed Ottoman rule and called for the maintenance of the Ottoman Empire were dubbed “turcophile”. The Eastern Question was one of the dominant political issues in Europe before the outbreak of the First World War, and the geopolitical conflicts that arose from the declining fortunes of the Ottomans were the cause of periodic crisis, great and small. By the early years of the Wilhelmine era, turcophilism was remarkably vibrant in 1 Imperial Germany when discussions turned toward the fate of the Ottoman Empire. Germans were some of the greatest enthusiasts of “the Turk” around 1900, expressing sympathy for Muslim rule and disdain for Christian minorities seeking autonomy. Oriental rugs and the Fez had become standard accoutrements in upper-middle class life, and turcophile opinions appeared to drown out concerns for Ottoman Armenians during the massacres in the 1890s.1 Hugo Zietz’s Yenidze tabacco factory in Dresden, modeled on a Moroccan mosque, quickly became a prominent symbol when it was completed in 1909. The building was immensely popular and proved to be an ideal marketing tool for Zietz’s tobacco, which was imported from the Ottoman domains in Macedonia.2 German engineering brought railroads and other infrastructure projects to the Ottoman Empire, and a Prussian military mission tried to reform the Ottoman army, causing tension and uneasiness with the other Great Powers. From the 1880s until the outbreak of the First World War in 1914, Germany invested both economic capital and military knowledge in the Ottoman state to strengthen it from within. But growing economic ties, which continued to lag behind other Great Powers’ until the First World War, hardly explain Germany’s relationship to the Ottomans.3 What was so special about the Ottoman Empire in the minds of Germans? How and why did turcophilism and sympathy for the Ottoman Empire become so common in Imperial 1 Margaret Lavinia Anderson, “Down in Turkey, Far Away: Human Rights, the Armenian Massacres and 2 Perdita Eimler. "Ein Stück Orient an der Elbe": Die orientalisierende Tabak- und Zigarettenfabrik Yenidze in Dresden (Magister Arbeit, Marburg University, 1994). 3 Sevket Pamuk. The Ottoman Empire and European Capitalism, 1820-1913: Trade, Investment and Production, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), Ulrich Trumpener, “Germany and the End of the Ottoman Empire” The Great Powers and the End of the Ottoman Empire, ed. Marian Kent. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1984). 2 Germany? Why did Germans show such little sympathy for Christian minorities in both the Balkans and Anatolia? Or was turcophilism confined to the “politicians, soldiers, and litterateurs”, who simply spoke louder than others? Even if this was the case, how did these social groups contribute to the emergence of German turcophilism? I attempt to answer these questions, while exploring the transformations of the German public sphere that gave turcophilism traction in Imperial Germany. Just as war reporting during the Crimean War was key to the emergence of British turcophile sympathies, German turcophilism first emerged in the pages of the German press, as war between the Ottoman Empire and Russia loomed in during the Great Eastern Crisis (1875-1878).4 Opinions and attitudes about Ottoman power unfolded in print and were buoyed by the mass market for newspapers that developed in the nineteenth century. In the wake of German unification, public interest in the Ottoman lands was stimulated by affairs of state and concerns for security. German diplomacy became a crucial factor in the Eastern Question and the maintenance of Ottoman rule. The military alliance between Imperial Germany and the Ottoman Empire was the culmination of a unique relationship, one that does not easily fit into the narratives of imperialism that predominate the historiography of Imperial Germany. This dissertation charts the relationship between German statecraft and public opinion regarding the Ottoman Empire before World War I. First, it analyzes the importance of the Eastern Question for German unification and how the foundations of 4 Ute Daniel, “Der Krimkrieg 1853-1856 und die Entstehungskontexte medialer Kriegsberichterstattung” in Augenzeugen: Kriegsberichterstattung vom 18. zum 21. Jahrhundert, ed. Ute Daniel (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006). 3 Bismarckian foreign policy informed the German-Ottoman military alliance of 1914. Second, it investigates the relationship between state officials and the press, as well as the structure of German news reporting from the Ottoman Empire. Third, it investigates the impact of German news reporting on the German public
Recommended publications
  • Appendix F Ottoman Casualties

    Appendix F Ottoman Casualties

    ORDERED TO DIE Recent Titles in Contributions in Military Studies Jerome Bonaparte: The War Years, 1800-1815 Glenn J. Lamar Toward a Revolution in Military Affairs9: Defense and Security at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century Thierry Gongora and Harald von RiekhojJ, editors Rolling the Iron Dice: Historical Analogies and Decisions to Use Military Force in Regional Contingencies Scot Macdonald To Acknowledge a War: The Korean War in American Memory Paid M. Edwards Implosion: Downsizing the U.S. Military, 1987-2015 Bart Brasher From Ice-Breaker to Missile Boat: The Evolution of Israel's Naval Strategy Mo she Tzalel Creating an American Lake: United States Imperialism and Strategic Security in the Pacific Basin, 1945-1947 Hal M. Friedman Native vs. Settler: Ethnic Conflict in Israel/Palestine, Northern Ireland, and South Africa Thomas G. Mitchell Battling for Bombers: The U.S. Air Force Fights for Its Modern Strategic Aircraft Programs Frank P. Donnini The Formative Influences, Theones, and Campaigns of the Archduke Carl of Austria Lee Eystnrlid Great Captains of Antiquity Richard A. Gabriel Doctrine Under Trial: American Artillery Employment in World War I Mark E. Grotelueschen ORDERED TO DIE A History of the Ottoman Army in the First World War Edward J. Erickson Foreword by General Huseyin Kivrikoglu Contributions in Military Studies, Number 201 GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Erickson, Edward J., 1950— Ordered to die : a history of the Ottoman army in the first World War / Edward J. Erickson, foreword by General Htiseyin Kivrikoglu p. cm.—(Contributions in military studies, ISSN 0883-6884 ; no.
  • World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives

    World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives

    AP European History: Period 4.1 Teacher’s Edition World War I Concept Learning Outline Objectives I. Long-term causes of World War I 4.1.I.A INT-9 A. Rival alliances: Triple Alliance vs. Triple Entente SP-6/17/18 1. 1871: The balance of power of Europe was upset by the decisive Prussian victory in the Franco-Prussian War and the creation of the German Empire. a. Bismarck thereafter feared French revenge and negotiated treaties to isolate France. b. Bismarck also feared Russia, especially after the Congress of Berlin in 1878 when Russia blamed Germany for not gaining territory in the Balkans. 2. In 1879, the Dual Alliance emerged: Germany and Austria a. Bismarck sought to thwart Russian expansion. b. The Dual Alliance was based on German support for Austria in its struggle with Russia over expansion in the Balkans. c. This became a major feature of European diplomacy until the end of World War I. 3. Triple Alliance, 1881: Italy joined Germany and Austria Italy sought support for its imperialistic ambitions in the Mediterranean and Africa. 4. Russian-German Reinsurance Treaty, 1887 a. It promised the neutrality of both Germany and Russia if either country went to war with another country. b. Kaiser Wilhelm II refused to renew the reinsurance treaty after removing Bismarck in 1890. This can be seen as a huge diplomatic blunder; Russia wanted to renew it but now had no assurances it was safe from a German invasion. France courted Russia; the two became allies. Germany, now out of necessity, developed closer ties to Austria.
  • The 1904 Anglo-French Newfoundland Fisheries Convention: Another Look

    The 1904 Anglo-French Newfoundland Fisheries Convention: Another Look

    RESEARCH NOTES/NOTES DE RECHERCHE The 1904 Anglo-French Newfoundland Fisheries Convention: Another Look THE EXISTING LITERATURE ON ANGLO-FRENCH RELATIONS at the turn of the century, as well as that which specifically addresses the 1904 entente cordiale, for the most part makes only passing mention of the Newfoundland fisheries issue. Understandably, the focus of these accounts tends to be on the changing relations between the great powers, and on the most important aspect of the entente itself, which was the definition of boundaries and spheres of influence in North and West Africa. The exceptions are P.J.V. Rolo's study of the entente, which does recognize the crucial place of the fisheries issue in the context of the overall negotiation, and F.F. Thompson's brief account of the Newfoundland settlement from a colonial perspective in his standard work on the French, or Treaty, Shore question. i This note expands these accounts of the evolution of the 1904 Anglo-French Fisheries Convention, reinforces the view that it was vital to the successful completion of the overall package, and looks at the aftermath. This is not the place to discuss in detail the reasons for Anglo-French rapprochement which culminated in the 1904 entente cordiale. At the risk of oversimplification, one can point to several key factors. The Fashoda incident (1898) demonstrated, in time, to many French politicians that there was no hope of ending the resented British occupation of Egypt and the Nile valley. Confrontation with Britain in Africa was clearly futile, and accommodation potentially advantageous. Increasingly, the parti colonial urged the French government to consider giving up its financial and economic influence in Egypt, recognizing British predominance there, in return for British acceptance of France's ambition to establish a protectorate over Morocco and concessions elsewhere.2 Once this reasoning had been accepted and advanced by the French government, the British government eventually proved willing to respond positively (if carefully).
  • Eugen Richter and Late German Manchester Liberalism: a Reevaluation

    Eugen Richter and Late German Manchester Liberalism: a Reevaluation

    Eugen Richter and Late German Manchester Liberalism: A Reevaluation Ralph ~aico* or several generations now there has existed an overarching interpretation of modern history conditioning and shaping the views held by nearly all educated people on the issue of F - - socialism and the market economy. This interpretation goes roughly as follows: once there was a "class"-"the" bourgeoisie-that came into being with the colossal economic and social changes of early modern history, and strove for recognition and domination. Liberal- ism, which admittedly helped to achieve a limited degree of human liberation, was the ideological expression of the bourgeoisie's self-in- terested struggle.' Meanwhile, however, another, much larger class came into being, "the" working class, victims of the triumphant bourgeoisie. This class strove in its turn for recognition and domina- tion, and, accordingly, developed its own ideology, socialism, which aimed, through revolution, at the transition to a higher, broader level of human liberation. The natural and inevitable conflict of interests of these two classes- basically, of the exploiters and the exploited- fills modern history, and has led in the end, in the welfare state of our own time, to a kind of accommodation and compromise. With this historical paradigm I think we are all quite familiar. Recently, however, a different interpretation has begun to gain ground. The outstanding historian Ernst Nolte, of the Free Univer- sity of Berlin, has expressed its central point: *Ralph Raico is professor of history at the State University College at Buffalo, New York. This paper is based on a lecture given at Professor Christian Watrin's Wirtschaftspolitisches Seminar at the University of Cologne, June, 1988.
  • «Ich Wünschte Ein Bürger Zu Sein». Theodor Mommsen Im Wilhelminischen Reich

    «Ich Wünschte Ein Bürger Zu Sein». Theodor Mommsen Im Wilhelminischen Reich

    Originalveröffentlichung in: K. Christ - A. Momigliano (Hg.), Die Antike im 19. Jahrhundert in Italien und Deutschland, Bologna & Berlin 1988, S. 321-359 «Ich wünschte ein Bürger zu sein». Theodor Mommsen im wilhelminischen Reich von Jürgen Molitz I. -Politische Stellung und politischen Einfluß habe ich nie gehabt und nie erstrebt; aber in meinem innersten Wesen, und ich meine, mit dem Besten was in mir ist, bin ich stets ein animal politicum gewesen und wünschte ein Bürger zu sein. Das ist nicht möglich in unserer Nation, bei der der Einzelne, auch der Beste, über den Dienst im Gliede und den politischen Fetischismus nicht hinauskommt- Mommsens Kritik an der Politik seiner Zeit in der sogenannten 'Testamentsklausel' vom 2. September 1899 ist schon mehrfach in 2 ihrer Bedeutung gewürdigt worden . Dieses Dokument ist aber Abgekürzt zitiert werden die folgenden Titel: K. ZANGEMEISTER, Theodor Mommsen als Schriftsteller. Ein Verzeichnis seiner Schriften. Im Auftrage der königlichen Bi­ bliothek bearbeitet und fortgesetzt von Emil Jacobs, Berlin 1905 (ZJ); L.M. HARTMANN, Theodor Mommsen. Eine biographische Skizze. Mit einem Anhange: Ausgewählte politische Aufsätze Mommsens, Gotha 1908 (HARTMANN); A. HEUSS, Theodor Mommsen und das 19. Jahrhundert, Kiel 1956 (HEUSS); A. WUCHER, Theodor Mommsen. Geschichtsschreibung und Politik, Göttingen 1956 (WUCHER); L. WICKERT, Theodor Mommsen. Eine Biographie, 4 Bde., Frankfurt 1959-1980 (WICKERT). 1 Der Text der Testamentsklausel, weitergegeben durch ein ungenanntes Mitglied der Familie, wurde erstmals in der Zeitschrift -Die Wandlung-, 3, 1948, S. 69-70, veröffentlicht. Der vollständige Text ist bequem zugänglich z.B. bei WUCHER, S. 218- 219 sowie bei WICKERT, IV, S. 77 (-zur Unzeit ans Licht gebracht-).
  • CULTURAL HERITAGE in MIGRATION Published Within the Project Cultural Heritage in Migration

    CULTURAL HERITAGE in MIGRATION Published Within the Project Cultural Heritage in Migration

    CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Published within the project Cultural Heritage in Migration. Models of Consolidation and Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Communities Abroad funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund © Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova, Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova, editors, 2017 © Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum – BAS, 2017 © Paradigma Publishing House, 2017 ISBN 978-954-326-332-5 BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ETHNOLOGY AND FOLKLORE STUDIES WITH ETHNOGRAPHIC MUSEUM CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Edited by Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova Paradigma Sofia • 2017 CONTENTS EDITORIAL............................................................................................................................9 PART I: CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A PROCESS DISPLACEMENT – REPLACEMENT. REAL AND INTERNALIZED GEOGRAPHY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MIGRATION............................................21 Slobodan Dan Paich THE RUSSIAN-LIPOVANS IN ITALY: PRESERVING CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS HERITAGE IN MIGRATION.............................................................41 Nina Vlaskina CLASS AND RELIGION IN THE SHAPING OF TRADITION AMONG THE ISTANBUL-BASED ORTHODOX BULGARIANS...............................55 Magdalena Elchinova REPRESENTATIONS OF ‘COMPATRIOTISM’. THE SLOVAK DIASPORA POLITICS AS A TOOL FOR BUILDING AND CULTIVATING DIASPORA.............72 Natália Blahová FOLKLORE AS HERITAGE: THE EXPERIENCE OF BULGARIANS IN HUNGARY.......................................................................................................................88
  • Vladimir Paounovsky

    Vladimir Paounovsky

    THE B ULGARIAN POLICY TTHE BB ULGARIAN PP OLICY ON THE BB ALKAN CCOUNTRIESAND NN ATIONAL MM INORITIES,, 1878-19121878-1912 Vladimir Paounovsky 1.IN THE NAME OF THE NATIONAL IDEAL The period in the history of the Balkan nations known as the “Eastern Crisis of 1875-1879” determined the international political development in the region during the period between the end of 19th century and the end of World War I (1918). That period was both a time of the consolidation of and opposition to Balkan nationalism with the aim of realizing, to a greater or lesser degree, separate national doctrines and ideals. Forced to maneuver in the labyrinth of contradictory interests of the Great Powers on the Balkan Peninsula, the battles among the Balkan countries for superiority of one over the others, led them either to Pyrrhic victories or defeats. This was particularly evident during the 1912-1913 Balkan Wars (The Balkan War and The Interallied War) and World War I, which was ignited by a spark from the Balkans. The San Stefano Peace Treaty of 3 March, 1878 put an end to the Russo-Turkish War (1877-1878). According to the treaty, an independent Bulgarian state was to be founded within the ethnographic borders defined during the Istanbul Conference of December 1876; that is, within the framework of the Bulgarian Exarchate. According to the treaty the only loss for Bulgaria was the ceding of North Dobroujda to Romania as compensa- tion for the return of Bessarabia to Russia. The Congress of Berlin (June 1878), however, re-consid- ered the Peace Treaty and replaced it with a new one in which San Stefano Bulgaria was parceled out; its greater part was put under Ottoman control again while Serbia was given the regions around Pirot and Vranya as a compensation for the occupation of Novi Pazar sancak (administrative district) by Austro-Hun- - 331 - VLADIMIR P AOUNOVSKY gary.
  • The Political Ideas of Derviş Vahdeti As Reflected in Volkan Newspaper (1908-1909)

    The Political Ideas of Derviş Vahdeti As Reflected in Volkan Newspaper (1908-1909)

    THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) by TALHA MURAT Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University AUGUST 2020 THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) Approved by: Assoc. Prof. Selçuk Akşin Somel . (Thesis Supervisor) Assist. Prof. Ayşe Ozil . Assist. Prof. Fatih Bayram . Date of Approval: August 10, 2020 TALHA MURAT 2020 c All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) TALHA MURAT TURKISH STUDIES M.A. THESIS, AUGUST 2020 Thesis Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Selçuk Akşin Somel Keywords: Derviş Vahdeti, Volkan, Pan-Islamism, Ottomanism, Political Islam The aim of this study is to reveal and explore the political ideas of Derviş Vahdeti (1870-1909) who was an important and controversial actor during the first months of the Second Constitutional Period (1908-1918). Starting from 11 December 1908, Vahdeti edited a daily newspaper, named Volkan (Volcano), until 20 April 1909. He personally published a number of writings in Volkan, and expressed his ideas on multiple subjects ranging from politics to the social life in the Ottoman Empire. His harsh criticism that targeted the policies of the Ottoman Committee of Progress and Union (CUP, Osmanlı İttihâd ve Terakki Cemiyeti) made him a serious threat for the authority of the CUP. Vahdeti later established an activist and religion- oriented party, named Muhammadan Union (İttihâd-ı Muhammedi). Although he was subject to a number of studies on the Second Constitutional Period due to his alleged role in the 31 March Incident of 1909, his ideas were mostly ignored and/or he was labelled as a religious extremist (mürteci).
  • Béatrice Knerr (Ed.) Transfers from International Migration

    Béatrice Knerr (Ed.) Transfers from International Migration

    U_IntLabMig8_neu_druck 17.12.12 08:19 Seite 1 8 Béatrice Knerr (Ed.) Over the early 21st century the number of those living in countries in which they were not born has strongly expanded. They became international mi- grants because they hope for jobs, livelihood security, political freedom, or a safe haven. Yet, while the number of those trying to settle in richer coun- tries is increasing, entry hurdles mount up, and host countries become more selective. While low-skilled migrants meet rejection, highly qualified are welcome. All this hold significant implications for the countries and families the migrants come from, even more so as most of them keep close relations to their origin, and many return after a longer or shorter period of time. Some settle down comfortably, others struggle each day. Some return to their home country, others stay for good. Some loose connection to rel- atives and friends, others support them by remittances for livelihood secu- International Labor Migration/// Series edited by Béatrice Knerr 8 rity and investment. In any case, most of these international migrants are – explicitly or not–involved in various stabilization strategies, be it by house- hold/family agreements, government efforts to attract valuable human capital, or sheer expectations by different actors. Transfers from This volume intends to span this spectrum by presenting impressive case studies covering essential facets of international migrants’ relationships International Migration: within their families and societies of origin. Each case study represents an essential type of linkage, starting with financial remittances, for livelihood security or investment purposes, over social remittances, up to political in- fluence of the Diaspora, covering the family/household, community and A Strategy of Economic and Social Stabilization country level.
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate

    1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate

    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
  • Jahrbuch Für Historische Bildungsforschung 2019

    Jahrbuch Für Historische Bildungsforschung 2019

    Jahrbuch für Historische Bildungsforschung 2019. Schwerpunkt 1919: Demokratisierung, Bildungssystem und politische Bildung Bad Heilbrunn : Verlag Julius Klinkhardt 2019, 331 S. - (Jahrbuch für Historische Bildungsforschung; 25) Empfohlene Zitierung/ Suggested Citation: Jahrbuch für Historische Bildungsforschung 2019. Schwerpunkt 1919: Demokratisierung, Bildungssystem und politische Bildung. Bad Heilbrunn : Verlag Julius Klinkhardt 2019, 331 S. - (Jahrbuch für Historische Bildungsforschung; 25) - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-214607 - http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-214607 in Kooperation mit / in cooperation with: http://www.klinkhardt.de Nutzungsbedingungen Terms of use Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, We grant a non-exclusive, non-transferable, individual and limited persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses right to using this document. Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für den This document is solely intended for your personal, non-commercial persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. Die use. Use of this document does not include any transfer of property Nutzung stellt keine Übertragung des Eigentumsrechts an diesem rights and it is conditional to the following limitations: All of the Dokument dar und gilt vorbehaltlich der folgenden copies of this documents must retain all copyright information and Einschränkungen: Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments other information regarding legal protection. You are not allowed to müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf alter this document in any way, to copy it for public or commercial gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute or Dokument nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie otherwise use the document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.
  • Germany from Luther to Bismarck

    Germany from Luther to Bismarck

    University of California at San Diego HIEU 132 GERMANY FROM LUTHER TO BISMARCK Fall quarter 2009 #658659 Class meets Tuesdays and Thursdays from 2 until 3:20 in Warren Lecture Hall 2111 Professor Deborah Hertz Humanities and Social Science Building 6024 534 5501 Readers of the papers and examinations: Ms Monique Wiesmueller, [email protected]. Office Hours: Wednesdays 1:30 to 3 and by appointment CONTACTING THE PROFESSOR Please do not contact me by e-mail, but instead speak to me before or after class or on the phone during my office hour. I check the mailbox inside of our web site regularly. In an emergency you may contact the assistant to the Judaic Studies Program, Ms. Dorothy Wagoner at [email protected]; 534 4551. CLASSROOM ETIQUETTE. Please do not eat in class, drinks are acceptable. Please note that you should have your laptops, cell phones, and any other devices turned off during class. Students do too much multi-tasking for 1 the instructor to monitor. Try the simple beauty of a notebook and a pen. If so many students did not shop during class, you could enjoy the privilege of taking notes on your laptops. Power point presentations in class are a gift to those who attend and will not be available on the class web site. Attendance is not taken in class. Come to learn and to discuss. Class texts: All of the texts have been ordered with Groundworks Books in the Old Student Center and have been placed on Library Reserve. We have a systematic problem that Triton Link does not list the Groundworks booklists, but privileges the Price Center Bookstore.