DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Interchanges Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Interchanges Evaluation ENEO2050 INTERCHANGE EVALUATION Planning and Programming Committee April 09, 2021 6-1 INTRODUCTION Proposed Highway Interchange Projects: • Modified Interchanges: • Interstate 77 at Miller Road, Brecksville, Cuyahoga County • Interstate 480 at Granger Road, Garfield Heights, Cuyahoga County • US highway 422 at Harper Road, Solon, Cuyahoga County • State Route 44 at Jackson Road, Painesville, Lake County • New Interchanges: • Interstate 71 at Boston Road, Strongsville, Cuyahoga County • Interstate 71 at State Route 57(or 162), Medina, Medina County • Interstate 271 at White Road, Highland Heights, Mayfield, Willoughby Hills, Cuyahoga, Lake Counties • State Route 10 at State Route 57, Elyria, Lorain County 6-1 ACTION REQUESTED No action is requested at this time. This item is for discussion and input from the Committee to determine inclusion in eNEO2050 by the Board of Directors at its June 2021 meeting. PREVIOUS ACTION None 6-1 Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving IncreasedTRANSPORTATION Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility PLANNING Achieving Increased Mobility CRITERIA Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving 6-1 BACKGROUND According to the recently NOACA Board approved “New or Modified Highway Interchange Projects Policy”: Two Sets of Criteria should be satisfied: 1. Transportation Planning Criteria • Interchange Spacing • Cost-Benefit Analysis 2. Local and Regional Impact Criteria 6-1 INTERCHANGE SPACING SPACING INTERCHANGE CRITERIA I-77 at Miller Road N/A I-480 at Granger Road N/A SR 44 at Jackson Road N/A I-71 at Boston Road + I-71 at SR 57(or 162) + I-271 at White Road - 6-1 ANALYSIS AREAS Influence Area NOACA Region Seven-County Region 6-1 COST ITEMS Auto Congestion Cost Truck Congestion Cost Safety Cost Total Daily Cost Emissions Cost Pavement Cost Construction Cost Build No Build Daily Cost Total Daily Cost - Total Daily Cost Saving 6-1 HARPER ROAD INTERCHANGE EVALUATION Analysis Influence Area Area 2050 Base with Estimated Daily 2050 Harper Road Costs (2050$) Base Interchange 1,208,771 1,211,725 Congestion $142,855 $134,025 120,027 120,255 Truck Congestion $32,743 $30,430 1,328,797 1,331,980 Safety $249,491 $249,995 786,150 788,747 Emissions $114,903 $109,143 88,989 89,349 Maintenance $5,031 $5,043 37,954 37,703 Construction 0 $1,841 4,181 3,897 Total Daily Cost $545,023 $530,327 Daily Cost/Saving $14,696 265 243 6-1 GRANGER ROAD INTERCHANGE EVALUATION Analysis Influence Area Area 2050 Base with Estimated Daily 2050 Granger Road Costs (2050$) Base Interchange 1,227,800 1,238,747 Congestion $129,777 $122,623 95,655 95,776 Truck Congestion $27,354 $25,503 1,323,456 1,334,522 Safety $249,238 $249,935 791,447 811,307 Emissions $106,056 $101,063 73,212 73,449 Maintenance $4,968 $5,008 37,597 37,306 Construction $0 $3,371 3,758 3,514 Total Daily Cost $517,392 $507,502 Daily Cost/Saving* $9,890 217 200 6-1 JACKSON STREET INTERCHANGE EVALUATION Analysis Influence Area Area 2050 Base with Estimated Daily 2050 Jackson Street Costs (2050$) Base Interchange 760,557 755,850 Congestion $24,029 $17,391 47,350 47,114 Truck Congestion $3,480 $2,134 807,907 802,964 Safety $155,860 $154,570 467,990 467,599 Emissions $32,729 $28,563 31,553 32,046 Maintenance $3,013 $2,994 21,355 21,195 Construction $0 $3,545 Total Daily Cost $219,110 $209,198 710 500 Daily Cost/Saving* $9,913 29 17 6-1 MILLER ROAD INTERCHANGE EVALUATION Analysis Influence Area Area 2050 Base with Estimated Daily 2050 Miller Road Costs (2050$) Base Interchange Congestion $78,909 $80,345 Truck Congestion $17,421 $17,918 Safety $189,529 $191,672 Emissions $75,749 $76,580 Maintenance $3,934 $3,992 Construction $0 $1,802 Total Daily Cost $365,542 $372,309 Daily Cost*/Saving -$6,766 6-1 BOSTON ROAD INTERCHANGE EVALUATION Analysis Influence Area Area 2050 Base with Estimated Daily 2050 Boston Road Costs (2050$) Base Interchange 1,799,490 1,815,789 Congestion $173,468 $173,067 161,831 161,757 Truck Congestion $29,257 $29,683 1,961,321 1,977,546 Safety $400,800 $400,736 872,590 911,754 Emissions $165,437 $164,391 117,247 117,611 Maintenance $7,398 $7,457 74,583 74,319 Construction 0 $1,802 5,167 5,120 Total Daily Cost $776,361 $777,137 Daily Cost/Saving $-776 237 239 6-1 STATE ROUTE 57 (162) INTERCHANGE EVALUATION Analysis Influence Area Area 2050 Base with Estimated Daily 2050 State Route 57 Costs (2050$) Base Interchange 2,676,569 2,721,053 Congestion $269,621 $263,884 392,027 393,051 Truck Congestion $58,616 $62,115 3,068,596 3,114,104 Safety $639,476 $645,277 1,149,771 1,202,785 Emissions $229,434 $225,302 283,851 286,255 Maintenance $11,827 $11,993 82,425 82,279 Construction $0 $3,545 8,069 7,823 Total Daily Cost $1,208,973 $1,212,117 Daily Cost/Saving $-3,144 477 501 6-1 WHITE ROAD INTERCHANGE EVALUATION Analysis Influence Area Area 2050 Base with Estimated Daily 2050 White Road Costs (2050$) Base Interchange 1,131,802 1,144,060 Congestion $48,231 $48,545 135,048 135,617 Truck Congestion $9,208 $9,804 1,266,850 1,279,677 Safety $250,670 $251,642 682,145 703,818 Emissions $57,538 $57,458 109,749 109,840 Maintenance $4,834 $4,882 33,185 33,193 Construction $0 $3,545 1,442 1,434 Total Daily Cost $370,481 $375,877 Daily Cost/Saving* $-5,396 75 79 6-1 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CRITERIA EVALUATION COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS INFLUENCE AREA -$18,277 +$18,277 -$10,956 +$10,956 -$27,251 +$27,251 -$38,818 +$38,818 $77,636 -$18,524 +$18,524 $37,048 -$60,449 +$60,449 $120,897 6-1 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CRITERIA EVALUATION COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS NOACA REGION -$1,040,053 +$1,040,053 -$1,039,882 +$1,039,882 -$1,039,849 +$1,039,849 6-1 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CRITERIA EVALUATION COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR SEVEN COUNTY REGION -$1,507,543 +$1,507,543 6-1 Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased MobilityREGIONALAchieving Increased Mobility IMPACT Achieving Increased CRITERIA Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving Increased Mobility Achieving 6-1 BACKGROUND An analysis of regional impacts must consider both the communities that will receive new development/employees ("receiving communities") and the communities that will MILLER GRANGER JACKSON lose development/employees ("leaving communities"). Such an analysis must also ROAD ROAD STREET consider all transportation impacts, not just traffic impacts. Finally, an analysis must consider both short-term and long-term impacts. STRENGTHEN REGIONAL COHESION OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS RUBRICS STATUS STATUS STATUS Change in total population and EJ population within interchange influence area (relative to one another)? + NONE + Number of jobs that move in association with the Enhance the inter- interchange; + + relationships of + communities within the region. Change in income tax among all communities as a result of interchange (both short-term and long-term); + + + EJ population in "leaving" communities versus EJ population in "receiving" communities. NOACA may need to hire an economist to assess ripple effects of job NONE shift and change in access on both "leaving" - + 6-1 An analysis of regional impacts must consider both the communities that will receive new development/employees ("receiving communities") and the communities that will MILLER GRANGER JACKSON lose development/employees ("leaving communities"). Such an analysis must also ROAD ROAD STREET consider all transportation impacts, BACKGROUNDnot just traffic impacts. Finally, an analysis must consider both short-term and long-term impacts. PRESERVE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTIVES ANALYSIS RUBRICS STATUS STATUS STATUS 1. Is the proposed interchange within the 1970 development footprint of Northeast Ohio (show location NO YES NO Preserve or maintain on map of 1970 development footprint)? existing infrastructure that serves currently 2. Will the proposed interchange cause development on developed areas of the previously undeveloped land (if yes, how many acres)? NO + region. + 3. Will the proposed interchange reduce utility of currently developed land (if yes, how many acres)? NO NO NO 1. Will the proposed interchange stimulate development on previously developed, but currently underutilized, land (if yes, how many acres? How many of these acres + NONE Facilitate improvementsqualify as brownfields?) + that connect existing 2. Is the proposed interchange within one mile of an activity centers and existing major jobs hub (if not, will the proposed reinvigorate existing interchange create a newmajor jobs hub)? NO NO NO communities 3. What is the anticipated level of investment in economic development within influence area of NONE + proposed interchange (CY dollars)? + 1. Change in residential density within influence area of proposed interchange (compare to residential densities 6-1 within influence area of other interchanges); NONE + Facilitate development + in higher density areas. 2 Change in employment density within influence area An analysis of regional impacts must consider both the communities that will receive new development/employees ("receiving communities") and the communities that will MILLER GRANGER JACKSON lose development/employees ("leavingBACKGROUND communities").
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Directions to Cleveland Operations
    Directions to Cleveland Works 1600 Harvard Avenue Cleveland, OH 44105 Please note that there are no sleeping areas at this facility. You must stop at a rest area or truck stop. From Interstate 71 th North bound: Take 1-71 North to Exit 247A, W. 14 St. and Clark Ave. Make a right at the end of the exit ramp. nd Then take route 176 south, approx. ¼ mile on your left. Harvard Ave. will be your 2 exit. At the end of the rd ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 209, Lodi From Interstate 77 North bound: Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 111, North Canton From Interstate 80 East East or West bound: Exit 11 / 173 to I-77 North. Take I-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area East Bound between exits 10 / 161 and 11 / 173 West Bound between exits 14 / 209 and 13A / 193 From Interstate 480 East bound: Exit 17 onto Route 176 North. Exit onto Harvard Ave. Take a right onto Harvard Ave. Gate 6 will rd be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area None West bound: Exit 20B onto I-77 North. Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave).
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cleveland Location in the NOACA Region
    CITY OF C LEVEL AND T HE C ITY OF C LEVELAND R OADWAY P AVEMENT M AINTENANCE R EPORT T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Background ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. PART I: 2016 Pavement Condition ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 4. PART II: 2018 Current Backlog ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 5. PART III: Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Program ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Office Buildings for SALE Monarch Centre - 5885 Landerbrook, Mayfield Heights, OH PDC Building - 3659 S
    GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION (As available @ 8/2020 - subject to change without notice) 1st Time on Market in 30+ years! 3 Office Buildings FOR SALE Monarch Centre - 5885 Landerbrook, Mayfield Heights, OH PDC Building - 3659 S. Green Road, Beachwood, OH The Fairways - 3601 S. Green Road, Beachwood, OH Monarch Centre PDC Building The Fairways Presented Exclusively by: Ag REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC. Eric M. Silver, President & Broker Ag Real Estate Group, Inc. 3659 South Green Road, Suite 216 / Beachwood, Ohio 44122 / 216.504.5000-T / 216.504.5001-F www.agrealestategroup.com / [email protected] AgAg RealReal EstateEstate Group,Group, Inc.Inc. CONSUMER GUIDE TO AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS We are pleased you have selected Ag Real Estate Group, Inc. to help you with your real estate needs. Whether you are selling, buying or leasing real estate Ag Real Estate Group, Inc. can provide you with expertise and assistance. Because this may be the largest financial transaction you will enter into, it is important to understand the role of the agents and brokers with whom you are working. Below is some information that explains the various services agents can offer and their options for working with you: For more information on agency law in Ohio you can also contact the Ohio Division of Real Estate & Professional Licensing at (614) 466-4100, or on their website www.com.state.oh.us. Representing the Sellers Most sellers of real estate choose to list their home for sale with a real estate brokerage. When they do so, they sign a listing agreement that authorizes the brokerage and the listing agent to represent their interests.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Beachwood, Ohio Police Department
    The City of Beachwood, Ohio Police Department ANNUAL REPORT 2010 INTRODUCTION The following material documents the activities of the Beachwood Police Department for the year 2010. The successful operation of the police department is possible because of the support of Mayor Merle S. Gorden, the members of the Beachwood City Council, the other departments and employees of the City of Beachwood, and all our citizens both residential and commercial. I am pleased to report that we made great progress towards accomplishing the goals we identified in our most recent strategic plan. Commander Patrick Sullivan and Detective Michael Nelson have retired; their contributions to the department have been great. The year 2011 will see more retirements and we are well underway with the process of identifying quality candidates to fill their shoes. We recognize the quality of our entry level officers has an affect on the organization that will impact operations for decades; therefore our process for evaluation of the potential officers is thorough. Fortunately the number of candidates completing the testing process was ample and we are optimistic we will find quality individuals who are up to our standards. Our status as an accredited law enforcement agency by the CALEA, Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, was up for renewal in 2010. I am very proud to report that we passed all phases of the assessment as well as the subsequent commission review. July 31, 2010 we were awarded reaccreditation status and that award will be valid until 2013. The entire accreditation report is available for review on our web page.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Digest of Enactments
    DIGEST OF ENACTMENTS 2014 130th General Assembly (2013-2014) Ohio Legislative Service Commission Columbus, Ohio April 2015 DIGEST OF ENACTMENTS 2014 130th General Assembly (2013-2014) Ohio Legislative Service Commission House of Representatives Members Clifford A. Rosenberger, Speaker of the House, Chair Ron Amstutz Jim Buchy Nicholas J. Celebrezze Mike Dovilla Barbara R. Sears Fred Strahorn Senate Members Keith Faber, President of the Senate, Vice-Chair Edna Brown Cliff Hite Larry Obhof Thomas F. Patton Joe Schiavoni Chris Widener Director Mark Flanders April 2015 INTRODUCTION The Digest of Enactments 2014 summarizes legislation passed by the General Assembly during 2014, including 57 Senate bills, 79 House bills, Am. S.J.R. 6, and Am. Sub. H.J.R. 12. The summaries in this publication are condensed versions of the final analyses prepared by the Legislative Service Commission for the General Assembly. Readers may obtain the full final analyses from the General Assembly's website at http://archives.legislature.state.oh.us. The Digest of Enactments 2014 may be accessed via the Web at www.lsc.ohio.gov, by following the Publications link. A paper copy may be purchased for $6; items to be mailed require an additional $1 for postage. Address orders to: DIGEST OF ENACTMENTS Legislative Service Commission Library Vern Riffe Center 77 S. High Street, 9th Floor Columbus, OH 43215-6136 Please enclose a check or money order in the proper amount payable to the Ohio Legislative Service Commission. Persons or groups may reproduce all or any portion of the contents of this Digest in any format. The Commission claims no copyright or other basis requiring consent to replicate any portion of this publication, but requests that the Director be informed of any republication involving a public distribution and that the Commission be identified as the source of the material.
    [Show full text]
  • 1963 1963 the the of of of of Description Description
    e y ~ 'rte ~ 4 ~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~L +i's 's' ~ *" a~t,y'" J ^ ,..,T+s d az' ~ 8a•. ~r ~ ~Y. r~ ,~ } ~„ ~"' y s'~ ~- ~- N ~, 4 r ~ ts~ 0 ~ i~° e~ ~" t ~ y ~ _ ~ ~ y ^: *} ~ }t. ~ `/ ~ 6~ Y ~p S d~Y R" vW # ' `i ti r n' ke~s ~ J ~ ~ ~~ +3 ~ y t ~r x. t' ~ ~~ ~i _ ~.~y ~g x ,. 9~ :~ ~ x aaa+ra.. "' ~$ .;~w~.v 'Y~1se~n ~+~.~-*a fir;.: ~. ,... §~~`" u, a ., .. ~.: w Letters of Transmittal December 9, 1963 December 9, 1963 JOHN ERRECA EDMUND G. BROWN Director of Public Works Governor of California State of California My dear Governor: Dear Sir: The 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways, Depart- In compliance with Section 143 of the Streets and Highways ment of Public Works, which I am pleased to submit to you, Code, the 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways for presents a broad picture of the state highway program during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1963, is submitted herewith fiscal year 1962-63. It describes the steady progress in planning for your approval and transmittal to Governor Edmund G. and constructing today for tomorrow's transportation needs, as Brown. well as the activities of the division's various units. The report contains information on the construction program Your attention is invited to the comments contained in the through the end of 1963 and a description of the projects in enclosed letter of transmittal from the State Highway Engineer the budget for fiscal year 1964-65 which the California High- regarding progress on the interstate system and on the network way Commission adopted in October.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Stearns Road Corridor
    Potential Development Area (PDA) #2 I. PDA #2: Stearns Road/Interstate 480 Site Information o 62.05 Acres Total o 73 parcels – parcels are a majority of residential and some commercial o Zoning – please refer to zoning map below Traffic Data – Please refer below for a traffic count map. Accessibility – Stearns Road/Interstate 480 PDA #2 Interstate 480 At site Interstate 80 (Ohio Turnpike) 2.6 miles, 5 minutes Interstate 90 6.0 miles, 14 minutes Interstate 71 7.4 miles, 9 minutes Airports (Cleveland Hopkins International) 7.5 miles, 12 minutes Downtown Cleveland 17.2 miles, 19 minutes Wood Potential Development Area Pheasants Lorain Wellesley ¹ Elmhurst 72 71 1 70 69 4 68 2 3 67 5 66 6 65 64 7 63 8 62 9 10 61 11 60 59 12 58 13 Gareau 57 Sherwood 56 14 ForestRidge 55 15 54 16 53 17 Park Ridge 52 18 51 19 Stearns 50 20 49 21 48 22 47 23 46 24 45 25 44 26 43 27 42 28 41 40 29 Windsor Cambridge 39 30 38 31 33 32 34 Somerset 35 36 Stafford 37 Christman Brighton Surrey I-480 Aspen Tudor Current Zoning of Potential Development Area Berkshire Quail Whitehaven Wood ¹ Pheasants Elmhurst Lorain Wellesley Mc Kenzie Gareau Sherwood ForestRidge Park Ridge Stearns Windsor Cambridge Somerset Stafford Christman Surrey Brighton I-480 Legend Aspen One Family Residential One Family Residential One Family Residential General Retail Business Parcel Data – Stearns Road/I-480 PDA #2 Total Value Property Map ID Parcel Acres Owner Name Address Total Tax Value Total Value BLD LND Class 1 23420004 3.51 Viviani Fam Ltd Part.
    [Show full text]
  • 02-16-16 MINUTES of the 626Th MEETING
    MINUTES OF THE 626th MEETING OF THE OHIO TURNPIKE AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Chairman: Good morning ladies and gentlemen, it is 10:01 a.m. Would you please rise as we say our Pledge of Allegiance. The Meeting will come to order. Have all guests signed the sign-in sheet in the Lobby? If not, please do so prior to leaving, so we can maintain an accurate record of attendance. Both Senator Manning and Mr. Kauffman advised that they are unable to attend today’s Commission. Will the Assistant Secretary-Treasurer please call the roll? Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Chairman Hruby Chairman Hruby: Here Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Commissioner Paradiso Vice Chairman Paradiso: Here Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Commissioner Barber Secretary-Treasurer Barber: Here Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Commissioner McAuliffe Mr. McAuliffe: Here Chairman Hruby: Thank you, we have a quorum. Chairman: This is the 626th Meeting of the Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission. We are meeting here at the Commission’s headquarters, as provided for in the Commission’s Code of Bylaws for a Commission Special Meeting. Various reports will be received, and we will act on several resolutions. Draft copies have previously been sent to the Members and updated drafts are in the Members’ folders. The Resolutions will be explained during the appropriate reports. May I have a motion to adopt the Minutes of the January 19, 2016, Commission Meeting? 14930 MOTION: A motion to adopt the Minutes of the January 19, 2016, Commission Meeting was made by Vice Chairman Paradiso and seconded by Mr. McAuliffe. All Commission Members present voted to approve the Minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • AMATS Newsletter 2014 Volume 1
    @AMATS THE GREATER AKRON AREA’S TRANSPORTATION JOURNAL January - June 2014 Volume 3, Issue 1 Inside Community Focus: Northfield ............................page 4. Report Finds Good News, Bad News for Greater Akron’s Infrastructure ...............................page 6. Agency, Community Leaders Seek State Route 8 Re-designation ............................page 7. COVER: The Acme Fresh Market in Montrose was the site of a May 15 community meeting. Why? It was another step in the development of the Montrose Connectivity Plan. Walking Toward Better Connections in Montrose ......................................................................page 3. January-June 2014 @AMATS Volume 3, Issue 1 Something to think about on your walk - Pedestrian Crashes There were a few surprises in a new first-of-its-kind pedestrian analysis released by AMATS in late March. The three-year report spans 2010 through 2012 and is a comprehensive look by the agency at crashes involving pedestrians in the Greater Akron area. As the area’s transportation planning agency, AMATS regularly prepares vehicle crash reports - but with increased public interest in alternative forms of transportation such as walking - agency officials felt that the time was right to take a close look at pedestrian-related crashes. Among the key findings of the analysis are: • Akron tops the list of communities with the most pedestrian-related crashes with Kent coming in second. • There were 14 fatalities from pedestrian-related crashes between 2010 and 2012. • Pedestrian-related crashes account for less than 1 percent of all area crashes, but account for over 10 percent of fatalities. • Eighty-six percent of pedestrian-related crashes result in an injury to the pedestrian with 31 percent of those resulting in an incapacitating injury.
    [Show full text]
  • ODOT District 12 2021 Construction Program
    ODOT District 12 2021 Construction Program Lake Geauga Cu GARFIELD HTS. yahoga 12 SERVING CUYAHOGA, GEAUGA AND LAKE COUNTIES Mike DeWine, Ohio Governor | Jack Marchbanks, Ph. D., ODOT Director | John Picuri P.E., District Deputy Director ODOT DISTRICTODOT District12 | 2018 12 CONSTRUCTION 2021 Construction GUIDE Program Table of Contents Overview..................................................................... Page 2 Cuyahoga County....................................................... Pages 3-26 Geauga County........................................................... Pages 27-32 Lake County................................................................ Pages 33-38 Regional Projects....................................................... Pages 39-40 Local-Let Projects........................................................ Page 41-42 LOCAL LET PROJECTS 1 ODOT DISTRICTODOT District12 | 2018 12 CONSTRUCTION 2021 Construction GUIDE Program The Ohio Department of Transportation District 12 is responsible for the maintenance and construction on all Interstates, U.S. Routes, and State Routes in unincorporated municipalities in Cuyahoga, Geauga, and Lake counties. Each spring, we shift our focus from snow and ice removal to the construction and maintenance of our roadways. The 2021 Construction Program includes information about major construction projects in the District 12 tri-county area. For up to date project information and to sign up to receive project-related emails, please visit www.transportation.ohio.gov. To find additional project
    [Show full text]
  • Download Authenticated
    Ohio Administrative Code Rule 4901:2-8-04 Prohibitions. Effective: July 18, 2013 (A) As used in this rule, "northeast Ohio" means the following counties in the state of Ohio: Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina. (B) As used in this rule, "through transportation" means the transportation of hazardous materials which has neither a place of origin nor a destination in northeast Ohio. (C) The following routes shall be designated routes for the through transportation of hazardous materials in northeast Ohio: (1) Interstate 90 from the Lake/Ashtabula county line to interstate 271 in Lake county. (2) Interstate 80 and interstate 80/90 (Ohio Turnpike) from gate 13 in Portage county to the Lorain/Erie county line. (3) Interstate 271 from interstate 90 in Lake county to interstate 71 in Medina county. (4) Interstate 77 from interstate 80 in Cuyahoga county to interstate 271 in Summit county. (5) Interstate 71 from interstate 80 in Cuyahoga county to Medina/Wayne county line. (6) Interstate 480 from interstate 80, gate 13 in Portage county to interstate 271 in Summit county. (7) Interstate 480 from interstate 480N in Cuyahoga county to interstate 80 in Lorain county. (8) Interstate 480N from interstate 271 to interstate 480 in Cuyahoga county. (D) The following routes shall be restricted routes for the through transportation of hazardous materials in northeast Ohio: Page 1 (1) Interstate 90 from interstate 271 in Lake county to interstate 80/90 in Lorain county. (2) Interstate 71 from interstate 80 to interstate 90 in Cuyahoga county. (3) Interstate 77 from interstate 80 to interstate 90 in Cuyahoga county.
    [Show full text]