Diagnostic Approach to Vascular Anomalies
Eulalia Baselga Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau/ Hospital San Joan de Deu Barcelona SPAIN
30 min ESPD2019 DISCLOSURES
Speaker for : PI for: Isdin Novartis Almirall Pierre Fabre ▹ Pierre Fabre Polichem ▹ MSD Bioderma ▹ Leti Pfizer ▹ LEO pharma Lilly ▹ Ferrer Sanofi ▹ Mylan Founder: ▹ Sanofi ▹ Venthera ▹ [email protected]▹ 1ST STEP IS IT VASCULAR? NO
YES
2nd STEP VASCULAR TUMOR VASCULAR MALFORMATION
3rd STEP INFANTILE H ANOTHER T CAPILLARY VENOUS/GVM LYMPHATIC AV COMPLEX
SALMON P UNIFOCAL MICROCYSTIC
th 4 STEP PWS MULTIFOCAL MACROCYSTIC
CMTC FAMILIAL GLA GORHAM RETICULATED NOT FAMILIAL GEOGRAPHIC LYMPHEDEMA
“RASA TYPE”
5th STEP WORK-UP 1st STEP: IS IT VASCULAR? Conditions Masquerading as hemangiomas
Fibrosarcoma Rhabdomyosarcoma ▹ Neuroblastoma ▹ BIOPSY! Leukemia cutis ▹ Encephalocele ? ▹ Pilomatrixoma ▹ JXG ▹ LCH ▹
Frieden▹ et al. Austral J Dermatol 2009; 50; 77 Mulliken et al.; ISSVA
VASCULAR VASCULAR TUMORS MALFORMATIONS
More rapid Proliferative Very slow and progressive lesions changes
Histologically “tumoral” Histologically hamartomatous VASCULAR TUMORS OR VASCULAR MALFORMATION
A B C
Precursor RICH Deep Hemangiomas Lesions May look like May look like venous May look like CM predominant Malformations lesion BRBNS 3rd Step: WHICH VASCULAR TUMOR Vascular tumors, ISSVA 2014
Hemangioma of infancy Hobnail hemangioma Microvenular hemangioma Congenital hemangioma Anastomosing hemangioma Benign ▹ RICH;NICH;PICH ▹ Glomeruloid hemangioma Tufted angioma ▹ Papillary hemangioma ▹ ▸ ▹ Intravascular papillary endothelial Spindle-cell hemangioma ▹ hyperplasia Epithelioid hemangioma ▹ Cutaneous epithelioid angiomatous nodule ▹ ▹ Acquired elastotic hemangioma ▹ Pyogenic granuloma Littoral cell hemangioma of the spleen ▹ ▹ Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma▹ Papillary intralymphatic ▹ Retiform hemangioendothelioma ▹ angioendothelioma (PILA), Dabska tumor Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma Locally Composite hemangioendothelioma ▹ ▹ Polymorphous hemangioendothelioma agressive Kaposi sarcoma ▹ Hemangioendothelioma not otherwise ▹ ▹ specified ▹ ▹ Angiosarcoma ▹ Malignant Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma ▹ ▹ Vascular tumors, ISSVA 2014
Hemangioma of infancy Hobnail hemangioma Congenital hemangioma Microvenular hemangioma Benign Anastomosing hemangioma ▹ RICH;NICH;PICH ▹ Glomeruloid hemangioma Tufted angioma ▹ Papillary hemangioma ▹ ▸ ▹ Intravascular papillary endothelial Spindle-cell hemangioma ▹ hyperplasia ▹ Epithelioid hemangioma ▹ Cutaneous epithelioid angiomatous nodule ▹ Acquired elastotic hemangioma ▹ Pyogenic granuloma Littoral cell hemangioma of the spleen ▹ ▹ Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma ▹ Papillary intralymphatic ▹ Retiform hemangioendothelioma ▹ angioendothelioma (PILA), Dabska tumor Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma Locally Composite hemangioendothelioma ▹ ▹ Polymorphous hemangioendothelioma agressive Kaposi sarcoma ▹ Hemangioendothelioma not otherwise ▹ ▹ specified ▹ ▹ Angiosarcoma ▹ Malignant Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma ▹ ▹ 3rd Step: WHICH VASCULAR MALFORMATION? Capillary M Lymphatic M
AV M Venous or GVM Combined/Mixed Malformation
CLV
CV
CL 4th Step: Which SUBTYPE of vascular malformation Capillary malformation or Vascular stain : Which one?
Different recognizable phenotypes under the generic “capillary malformation “ There is more than “port-wine” Prognosis and work-up is different “Solid” capillary malf , PWS Somatic GNAQ p183 mutatio “Reticulated” , “ blotchy” , less saturated in color” cm PIK3CA;GNA11;PTPN11… Geographic; “deeply saturated” in color PIK3CA, GNAQ.. “lower lip” capillary malformation
PIK3CA “RASA-1 Type” RASA1; EPHB4 CMAVM vascular stains “PRE- AV” stains MAPK:RASA1; EPHB4 CMTC 5 th Work-up for Vascular Tumors
Infantile hemangioma PHACEs Syndrome 20-30% (OMIM 606519) • Posterior fossa malformation • Large segmental Facial Hemangioma • Arterial anomalies 91% • Cardiac and Coartation 45% • Eye anomalies • Sternal raphe
90% of pt with Phace: > 1 Pediatrics 2001 139:117-23 extracutaneous manifestation Arch Dermatol 1996;132:307-1 British J Dermatol 2005;153:1053 • 5 pt with thoracic / arm hemangiomas • Tortuosity of CNS vessels • Abnormal subclavian or aortic artery J Pediatr. 2016 Nov;178:24-33. Initial Work up for PHACE
MRI with gadolinium and MRA head
▹ and neck Echocardiogram
▹ Ophthalmologic exam ▹ Hearing test if postnatal screening ▹ has not been done Growth curve check-up
▹ IF beard area, check airway ▹ Pelvis/Sacral/Lumbar Syndrome
• Dysraphism 50% • Abnormal genitalia • Renal abnormalities
Arch Derm 2006; 884. Dermatology 2007; 40 Segmental HI Lumbosacral
Check for genital abnormalities
▹ < 3 m Ultrasound spine, renal, ▹ abdomen, pelvis > 3 m : Spinal, abdominopelvic MRI
▹ Multifocal Hemangiomas
16% children with more than 5 IH have hepatic hemangiomas. ▹ Usually asymptomatic when screened by ultrasound ▹ When screened usually detected earlier and better prognosis ▹ If diffuse hepatic hemangiomas: Check for hypothyroidism ▹
Pediatr Dermatol. 2011 28:245-53. Pediatr Dermatol 2015;32:808 5th Step: Work-Up for Vascular malformations
Capillary M or Vascular stains PWS on face ( GNAQ 183) SWS 10-15%
- Leptomeningeal angiomatosis and/or
- Glaucoma
R. Waelchli et al. New vascular classification of port wine stains: improving prediction of Sturge- Weber risk. BJD 2014, Oct;171(4):861-7 R. Waelchli et al. New vascular classification of port wine stains: improving prediction of Sturge-Weber risk. BJD 2014;171:861-7
GNAQ p183 mutation A prospective study of risk for Sturge-Weber syndrome in children with upper facial port-wine stain 0% 20% 0% Prospective study
▹ 66 pt < 1 y.o with ▹ PWS affecting frontal area 7% 47% 27% MRI to all, under
▹ 1y.o 11/66 (16%) had
▹ SWS Dutkiewicz et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:473-80 • Prospective study • 66 pt < 1 y.o with PWS affecting frontal area • MRI to all, under 1y.o
11/66 had leptomeningeal angiomatosis
Distribution in these 11 pt with SWS
Dutkiewicz et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:473-80 Zallmann M. Retrospective review of screening for Sturge- Weber syndrome with brain magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography in infants with high-risk port- wine stains Retrospective review 32 children at risk SWS
▹ ( frontal area afected) MRI in 14/32
▹ Positive imaging in 11, and false negative in 3 In false negatives mri was done 4 d,7 wk and 8 wk, very ▹ early ▸ Deep venous anomaly ( highly predictive of epilepsy)
PPV▸ 100%; NPV 77% ▹ Somatic Mutation in PIK3CA
Cloves MCAP PIK3CA Klippel-trenaunay CLAPO P ik3Ca- PTEN hamartoma Sd PTEN (Cowden/BRRS/Solamen) elated Proteus R AKT O vergrow S mTORpectrum
Cell growth, Proliferation, Angiogenesis Where in the gene is the mutation/Degr ee of cell cycle acivation
Other Genetic Modifiers/epig enetics What cell lineages are affected
PHENOTYPE
When during embryogenesis Number of the mutation cells affected occured GENOTYPING-PHENOTYPE correlation of Vascular stains and overgrowth
• Multi-institutional study-20 sites • Vascular lesion + discrepancy of growth • Wide phenotypic spectrum • 314 patients enrolled • 160 affected tissue samples • Fresh frozen • Paraffin embedded • 112 sequenced (57 published*) (NGS, hybrid capture) *J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Apr;138(4):957-967. RESULTS
PIK3CA (30)
▹ GNAQ (12) ▹ GNA11 (7) ▹ PIK3R1 (7) ▹ RASA1 (2) ▹ MAP2K1 (1) ▹ PTPN11 (1) ▹ Work-up for vascular stains associated with overgrowth
Lower Extremities • Check for scoliosis, need to correction
Macrocephaly • Cranial MR
Dilated veins or venous • D- dimer/ fibrinogen component • Consider LMWH at risk
Spinal involvement • Xray if scoliosis lipomas, AVM, • MR trunk
Cancer risk (Wilms tumor ?, • Repeted Renal US until 8 years (Cloves and Proteus, other??) others?) WORK-UP for Venous malformations
Coagulations studies: D-Dimers ▹ Fibrinogen ▸ Risk▸ DVT ▹ Internal Involvement ▹ WORK-UP for Lymphatic malformations
Localized
▹ Generalized Bones afected or not ▹ ▸ Work-up for arteriovenous malformation 1ST STEP IS IT VASCULAR? NO
YES
2nd STEP VASCULAR TUMOR VASCULAR MALFORMATION
3rd STEP INFANTILE H ANOTHER T CAPILLARY VENOUS/GVM LYMPHATIC AV COMPLEX
SALMON P UNIFOCAL MICROCYSTIC
th 4 STEP PWS MULTIFOCAL MACROCYSTIC
CMTC FAMILIAL GLA GORHAM RETICULATED NOT FAMILIAL GEOGRAPHIC LYMPHEDEMA
“RASA TYPE”
5th STEP WORK-UP