That's the Question

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

That's the Question Romanization or not Romanization – that’s the Question Indisier på romanisering i den første boken av Caesars De Bello Gallico Master i Historie – HI320S Vår 2011 Universitetet i Nordland Fakultet for Samfunnsvitenskap Michèle Gabathuler Takk… …til veilederen min Per-Bjarne Ravnå, som har vært uendelig tålmodig og som har ledet meg tilbake på veien igjen når jeg har gått meg vill så mange ganger. Takk for gode råd, tipps og ideer, og ikke minst for at du tok imot utfordringen med å veilede en sveitser som skriver som Yoda snakker og som er glad i å finne opp egne norske ord som ingen andre enn meg forstår. …til dere alle som måtte tåle mitt åndsfravær når vi var sammen, som måtte høre på meg legge ut om hvor artig og spennende det er å skrive om dette temaet, som måtte svare på alle slags rare spørsmål i forbindelse med oppgava mi, og som måtte oppleve entusiasmen min om dere ville eller ikke. …til dere alle som også måtte høre på sytingen min når berg- og dalbanen hadde nådd et lavpunkt igjen, der jeg syntes at det her aldri kommer til å gå bra. Takk for at dere sa “jo, det her kommer til å gå bra. Stå på.” Merci villmol allna eu! Michèle Gabathuler Bodø, 15.05.2011 1 ::ruuus::fUU'U6:n.n..tLtS C ...."SA~".~SA~ \4oI\R~ Pf!R1E5PeRIESPeReS f.G1lSKeRf.4IER6K1iR'1-4ER6~~. R\AI\Al. 1b9'PEN~1tWÆN AV SfNstNSI'N KA~I'GRGKAR'1IZ~KA~~" PRØMT"5~M'T'5ORØM1li irj ARET 50 F. KR. HAN GTAPrdi6'fA:Of/liSiAPf/li 0Iv\ON\~ Ft.EReFtAR1iFt.e~ mI!lOeR~æeoeR'~efiI'!Oe'R'~1, UMSrT&L.tEiUMS"r'11!UsUMf!i1"EUe HAl"'"HAP""HAP""~ """"""""RO\M6 50M ""'~ ._ 5Ot.DAl'ER501.~5O(.~TER I!!EiGAITl!566AITessATT IE/..elEI..eIEt.e I>eNPeN TlL.TTLru. DA~"'" K:IIiNTEK:IENTEK:IEN1'EVERI>eN VERPeNVERI>eN. ERPERE 5/K .... Ro\ AT I>eT I'KKe U~R f'IoI06 ,,~ LtTGi' HIIR I>ERE 1sm MAKENMIIK E ~ TITILL ~P6'~EVr PRISEniSER?R? FÅR GITGRMlPtMGGN ~ ~~~~~:~ t)I;'jP&i MNT'WiiAAN'T'&& 1b10 &L.A6i6L..AG &AU..EiRIG=EiALLGREi: De ~ _ osos; Dfi SOI\I\SOM 1bt<1bK erÆ'~ serERHeRReN6'sel'ER~Ne _ O<;;]:)GOGOG:Ps: PG 5<::Mo\~ "ftZSkGIGI~kSlrøRSle. la: I Err6'R'Ef"'T"I;RE1"'T"6R FR/lE:iFRIlE:i~ rHe:i DSøs 60CM~ HAPPIiAAPPIi 4iOP45QPiAtrfAir PSNPEN OG All"AL1" _ r .rrr 0&OG~ AL-PR1"AL_AL.P2rr SA6A eTTIæRe~~ FOR OVERMAKiEN.oveRMAK1l<N.0V&RMAlCTeN. ~ o. ~ n-:- © Goscinny & Uderzo, 2006. 2 Innhold Innledning ............................................................................................................................... 7 Romaniseringsforskning – før og nå ........................................................................................ 10 1. Romanisering – en første tilnærming til begrep og fenomen ........................................ 10 2. Romernes nøkkel til suksess ......................................................................................... 13 2.1 Strukturelle faktorer .................................................................................................... 14 2.1.1 Samfunnsstruktur……………………………………………………………….14 2.1.2 Urbanisering…………………………………………………………………….15 2.1.3 Tildeling av titler og romersk borgerrett………………………………………..17 2.1.4 Det romerske militærvesenet……………………………………………………18 2.1.5 La oss flytte til provinsen……………………………………………………….19 2.1.6 Påvirkningens strømretning……………………………………………..………19 2.2 Kulturelle faktorer ....................................................................................................... 20 2.2.1 Bybildet………………………………………...……………………………….20 2.2.2 Ny gravskikk og semi-nye guder…………………...…………………………..21 2.2.3 Handel og nye varer…………………………………………………………….22 2.2.4 Ovenfra-ned, eller nedenfra-opp?........................................................................25 2.3 Nøkkelen er… ............................................................................................................. 25 2.4 Selvromanisering ........................................................................................................ 27 2.5 “Spesialfall” språk ...................................................................................................... 28 3. Forskningens utvikling .................................................................................................. 31 3.1. Romaniseringsforskningens første skritt – modernismen .......................................... 32 3.2. Nye strømninger – fra 1960- til 90-tallet ................................................................... 34 3.3. Hvor står forskningen i dag? ...................................................................................... 37 3.3.1 Romersk og gallisk kulturell revolusjon..………………………………..……..41 3 3.3.2 Kreolisering?........................................................................................................44 3.3.3 Globalisering i antikken?.....................................................................................47 3.3.4 Akkulturasjonsteorien er død - eller?...................................................................51 3.3.5 En fokusendring?..................................................................................................53 Kilden – De Bello Gallico ........................................................................................................ 56 4. Mitt navn er Caesar, Gaius Julius Caesar ..................................................................... 57 4.1 Forfatteren Caesar – en kort oversikt .......................................................................... 62 4.2 De Bello Gallico under lupen ..................................................................................... 63 4.2.1 De Bello Gallico - et mesterlig propagandaskriv…...…………………………..66 4.2.2 The truth and nothing but the truth?.....................................................................67 4.2.3 Og dette er relevant i forhold til romanisering fordi……………………...…….68 5. Kilden: De Bello Gallico, liber I ................................................................................... 69 5.1 Det politiske system .................................................................................................... 70 5.1.1 Oppida..…………………………………………………………………………71 5.1.2 Forsamlinger…………………………………………………………………….72 5.1.3 Myndigheter - vergobretus eller konge?..............................................................74 5.1.4 Overherredømme og tributtpliktighet…………………………………………..77 5.1.5 Allianser og avtaler……………………………………………………………..78 5.1.6 Galliske patron-klient-forhold………………………………………………….79 5.1.7 Giftermål - formålstjenlige forbindelser………………………………………..80 5.1.8 Familie og folkemening i politikken……………………………………………81 5.1.9 "Gallia es omnis divisa en partes tres" - konkrete beskrivelser av politisk inndeling………………………………………………………………………..82 5.1.10 Jurisdiksjon…………………………………………………………………….83 5.1.11 Utveksling av gisler……………………………………………………………84 4 5.1.12 Penger og velstand som virkemiddel………………….………………………85 5.1.13 Militærvesenet………………………………………...……………………….86 5.1.14 Appellationes - titler……………………………………………………..…….88 5.2 Skikk & bruk ............................................................................................................... 89 5.3 Karakteregenskaper ..................................................................................................... 89 5.3.1 Generelle beskrivelser av gallerne……………………………………………...90 5.3.2 Belgerne…………………………………………...……………………………91 5.3.3 Helvetierne…………………………………………..………………………….92 5.3.4 Haeduerne…………………………………………..…………………………..95 5.4 Parisii vs Lutetia – kommunikasjon ............................................................................ 96 5.5 Germanerne – den siviliserte verdens verste mareritt ................................................. 97 5.6 Og han skrev det slik fordi… ...................................................................................... 99 6. Konklusjon ...................................................................................................................... 101 7. Bibliografi ....................................................................................................................... 107 7.1 Primærlitteratur ......................................................................................................... 107 7.2 Sekundærlitteratur ..................................................................................................... 107 7.3 Internet ...................................................................................................................... 115 Forkortelser: BG – C. Iulius Caesar. De Bello Gallico. i: Schönberger, O. (trans.). (2009). Der Gallische Krieg – De Bello Gallico. Lateinisch – deutsch. Tusculum Studienausgabe, 7. Auflage. Düsseldorf/Zürich, Artemis & Winkler Verlag. 5 RE - A. Pauly, G. Wissova & W. Kroll (eds.). (1893 - ) Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Alterthumswissenshaft. Stuttgart & München, Metzler. SPM - Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte. (2002) Die Schweiz vom Paläolithikum bis zum frühen Mittelalter. Vom Neandertaler bis zum Karl dem Grossen. Basel, Verlag Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte. 6 Innledning Per september 2009 hadde stormakten USA over en halv million soldater stasjonert rundt om i verden, de fleste – 171 000 – i kriseområdet Irak.1 Hvordan er virkningene av denne konstante militærpresens på lokalbefolkningen? Hvordan må denne følelsen være å ha en okkupasjonsmakt, inntrengere, stående i den egne by? Er det nysgjerrighet, er det frykt, er det aggresjon som beslaglegger både hjerte og sinn? Og hva kommer ut av dette møtet mellom øst og vest, to i utgangspunktet grunnforskjellige kulturer? Kanskje det
Recommended publications
  • Language Contact and Identity in Roman Britain
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 5-16-2016 12:00 AM Language Contact and Identity in Roman Britain Robert Jackson Woodcock The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Professor Alexander Meyer The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Classics A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Robert Jackson Woodcock 2016 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Indo- European Linguistics and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Woodcock, Robert Jackson, "Language Contact and Identity in Roman Britain" (2016). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 3775. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3775 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Language is one of the most significant aspects of cultural identity. This thesis examines the evidence of languages in contact in Roman Britain in order to determine the role that language played in defining the identities of the inhabitants of this Roman province. All forms of documentary evidence from monumental stone epigraphy to ownership marks scratched onto pottery are analyzed for indications of bilingualism and language contact in Roman Britain. The language and subject matter of the Vindolanda writing tablets from a Roman army fort on the northern frontier are analyzed for indications of bilingual interactions between Roman soldiers and their native surroundings, as well as Celtic interference on the Latin that was written and spoken by the Roman army.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Gallo-Roman Relations Under the Early Empire by Ryan Walsh A
    Gallo-Roman Relations under the Early Empire By Ryan Walsh A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Ancient Mediterranean Cultures Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013 © Ryan Walsh 2013 1 Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This paper examines the changing attitudes of Gallo-Romans from the time of Caesar's conquest in the 50s BCE to the start of Vespasian's reign in 70-71 CE and how Roman prejudice shaped those attitudes. I first examine the conflicted opinions of the Gauls in Caesar's time and how they eventually banded together against him but were defeated. Next, the activities of each Julio-Claudian emperor are examined to see how they impacted Gaul and what the Gallo-Roman response was. Throughout this period there is clear evidence of increased Romanisation amongst the Gauls and the prominence of the region is obvious in imperial policy. This changes with Nero's reign where Vindex's rebellion against the emperor highlights the prejudices still effecting Roman attitudes. This only becomes worse in the rebellion of Civilis the next year. After these revolts, the Gallo-Romans appear to retreat from imperial offices and stick to local affairs, likely as a direct response to Rome's rejection of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period
    Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period This volume is an investigation of how Augustine was received in the Carolingian period, and the elements of his thought which had an impact on Carolingian ideas of ‘state’, rulership and ethics. It focuses on Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims, authors and political advisers to Charlemagne and to Charles the Bald, respectively. It examines how they used Augustinian political thought and ethics, as manifested in the De civitate Dei, to give more weight to their advice. A comparative approach sheds light on the differences between Charlemagne’s reign and that of his grandson. It scrutinizes Alcuin’s and Hincmar’s discussions of empire, rulership and the moral conduct of political agents during which both drew on the De civitate Dei, although each came away with a different understanding. By means of a philological–historical approach, the book offers a deeper reading and treats the Latin texts as political discourses defined by content and language. Sophia Moesch is currently an SNSF-funded postdoctoral fellow at the University of Oxford, working on a project entitled ‘Developing Principles of Good Govern- ance: Latin and Greek Political Advice during the Carolingian and Macedonian Reforms’. She completed her PhD in History at King’s College London. Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period Political Discourse in Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims Sophia Moesch First published 2020 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • DBG Book 1 Outline
    Caesar’s De Bello Gallico BOOK I OUTLINE Chapter I 1-4 Gaul has three parts, inhabited by three tribes (Belgae, Aquitaini, and Celtae/Galli) who are different in language, institutions, and laws. 4-5. The rivers that separate the three areas. 6-11. Three reasons why the Belgae are the bravest. 11-15. The final reason explains why the Helvetians surpass the other Gauls in courage, because they fight regularly with the Germans, either in Germania or in their own land. 15-18. The boundaries of the land the Gauls occupy. 18-21. The boundaries of the land the Belgae occupy. 21-24. The boundaries of the land the Aquitani occupy. Chapter II 1-6. The richest and noblest Helvetian made a conspiracy among the nobility because of a desire for power and persuaded his people to leave their land with the argument that because of their surpassing courage they would easily get control of all Gaul. 6-12. He easily swayed them because the Helvetians were hemmed in on all sides by natural barriers. 12-15. As a result they had less freedom of movement and were less able to wage war against their neighbors, and thus their warriors were afflicted with great sorrow. 15-18. They considered their land, 240 miles by 180 miles, too small in comparison with their numbers and their glory in war. Chapter III 1-6 Persuaded by their situation and the authority of Orgetorix, the Helvetians decide to get ready for departure: they buy all the wagons and pack animals they can; plant as many crops as possible for supplies on the trip, and make alliances with the nearest states.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea Berit Van Neste University of South Florida
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 4-12-2006 Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea Berit Van Neste University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Scholar Commons Citation Neste, Berit Van, "Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea" (2006). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3782 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea by Berit Van Neste A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Religious Studies College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: James F. Strange, Ph.D. Paul G. Schneider, Ph.D. Michael J. Decker, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 12, 2006 Keywords: theology, philosophy, politics, patristic, medieval © Copyright 2006 , Berit Van Neste For Elizabeth and Calista Table of Contents Abstract ii Chapter 1 1 Introduction 1 Cicero’s Influence on Augustine 7 Chapter 2 13 Justice 13 Natural and Temporal Law 19 Commonwealth 34 Chapter 3 49 Just War 49 Chapter 4 60 Conclusion 60 References 64 i Cicero and St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manipulation of Fear in Julius Caesar's" Bellum Gallicum."
    THE MANIPULATION OF FEAR IN JULIUS CAESAR'S BELLUM GALLICUM by Kristin Slonsky Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2008 © Copyright by Kristin Slonsky, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43525-0 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43525-0 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 7 Aremorica Compiled by P
    Map 7 Aremorica Compiled by P. Galliou, 1997 Introduction The north-west of Gallia Lugdunensis has been investigated extensively over the past thirty years. Between them, aerial photography, rescue excavations and extensive ground-surveys have revealed thousands of Gallo-Roman sites, most of which are only recognizable as surface scatters of building materials and imported or native wares. This suggests that settlement densities were high in the most fertile parts of the area during the early Roman empire; by contrast, there was a sharp decline in the number of sites still occupied in the fourth and early fifth centuries A.D., for reasons so far not fully understood. This dramatic expansion in our knowledge of the pattern of Roman settlement has demanded a strictly selective approach to the compilation of the map. In general, only sites named in the ancient sources are marked, together with a small number of key settlements, either fully excavated or known to have acted as administrative, commercial and religious centers for their vicinity. These include civitas capitals, various nucleated settlements (vici), road stations, rural sanctuary complexes, and a small number of well-excavated villas and Roman forts, the latter belonging to the defensive network developed in the late third and early fourth centuries A.D. Much detailed information is summarized by TIR Condate, TIR Lutetia, and the CAG series. Few isolated rural sanctuaries–of the type so common in neighboring regions–have so far been identified here. Small shrines (fana), however, are far from rare in the countryside or in vici, but are not marked (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Oratio Recta and Oratio Obliqua in Caesar's De Bello
    VOICES OF THE ENEMY: ORATIO RECTA AND ORATIO OBLIQUA IN CAESAR’S DE BELLO GALLICO by RANDY FIELDS (Under the Direction of James C. Anderson, jr.) ABSTRACT According to his contemporaries and critics, Julius Caesar was an eminent orator. Despite the lack of any extant orations written by Caesar, however, one may gain insight into Caesar’s rhetorical ability in his highly literary commentaries, especially the De Bello Gallico. Throughout this work, Caesar employs oratio obliqua (and less frequently oratio recta) to animate his characters and give them “voices.” Moreover, the individuals to whom he most frequently assigns such vivid speeches are his opponents. By endowing his adversaries in his Commentarii with the power of speech (with exquisite rhetorical form, no less), Caesar develops consistent characterizations throughout the work. Consequently, the portrait of self-assured, unification-minded Gauls emerges. Serving as foils to Caesar’s own character, these Gauls sharpen the contrast between themselves and Caesar and therefore serve to elevate Caesar’s status in the minds of his reader. INDEX WORDS: Caesar, rhetoric, oratory, De Bello Gallico, historiography, propaganda, opponent, oratio obliqua, oratio recta VOICES OF THE ENEMY: ORATIO RECTA AND ORATIO OBLIQUA IN CAESAR’S DE BELLO GALLICO by RANDY FIELDS B.S., Vanderbilt University, 1992 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2005 © 2005 Randy Fields All Rights Reserved VOICES OF THE ENEMY: ORATIO RECTA AND ORATIO OBLIQUA IN CAESAR’S DE BELLO GALLICO by RANDY FIELDS Major Professor: James C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity
    The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wilkinson, Ryan Hayes. 2015. The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17467211 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity A dissertation presented by Ryan Hayes Wilkinson to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2015 © 2015 Ryan Hayes Wilkinson All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Michael McCormick Ryan Hayes Wilkinson The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity Abstract In the fifth and sixth centuries CE, the Roman Empire fragmented, along with its network of political, cultural, and socio-economic connections. How did that network’s collapse reshape the social and mental horizons of communities in one part of the Roman world, now eastern France? Did new political frontiers between barbarian kingdoms redirect those communities’ external connections, and if so, how? To address these questions, this dissertation focuses on the cities of two Gallo-Roman tribal groups.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.2 the Government of the Roman Republic
    1.2 The Government of the Roman Republic Standard 1.2: The Government of the Roman Republic Describe the government of the Roman Republic and the aspects of republican principles that are evident in modern governments. (Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for History and Social Studies) [8.T1.2] FOCUS QUESTION: How did the Government of the Roman Republic Contribute to the Development of Modern-Day Democracy? The Roman Forum was the center of the public sphere in Rome. Much of Rome's political process took place here. "Roman Forum from Palatine Hill" by Chalaph is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. The Roman Republic lasted from 509 to 27 BCE. Its system of government included features that are part of the United States government today, notably its processes for political decision making based on mutually agreeable compromise (Watts, 2018, p. 7). At the same time, Rome during the Republic and the Roman Empire, had many undemocratic features, including a rigid class system, slavery, and the sanctioning of everyday violence. Additionally, women could not attend or vote in political assemblies nor hold any political office. So, what did liberty, government, and democracy mean and for whom did they exist during the Roman Republic and later the Roman Empire? Building Democracy for All 1 "Roman Forum, Rome, Italy" by Eustaquio Santimano is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 The modules for this standard explore this question by examining the role of Roman government in Roman society and Roman engineering; the widespread presence of slavery in Roman society as well of the resistance of slaves (both in the ancient world and in North America) to their oppression; and the lasting impact of the Latin language on the English language and the words we use to discuss citizenship, government and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans and Barbarians in Tacitus' Battle Narratives
    ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER (Under the direction of Dr. Susan Mattern-Parkes) ABSTRACT The purpose of the study is to examine how Tacitus constructs ethnic stereotypes, namely those of the Romans and of the barbarians, in his battle narratives. The first section of the study explores his descriptions of technical aspects of the battle narrative, such as topography, use of weaponry, battle formations, and sieges. The second section examines the value judgments that Tacitus makes about the combatants and their actions, discussing the themes of discipline and virtus, as well as the leaders’ ability to lead by example and stifle dissent. In his descriptions of both the technical and the “moral” aspects of battle, Tacitus shapes his Romans quite differently from his barbarians. Tacitus constructs identities in his battle narratives possibly to satisfy his audience’s expectations or to make the scenes more understandable. Such constructions indicate that ethnocentrism plays an important role in Latin historiography, revealing racial prejudice in Roman society. INDEX WORDS: Tacitus, battle narratives, Roman army, barbarians, ethnicity. ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER B. A., Appalachian State University, 1998 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2002 © 2002 Ryan Michael Seeger All Rights Reserved ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER Approved: Major Professor: Susan Mattern-Parkes Committee: James Anderson Erika Thorgerson-Hermanowicz Electronic Version Approved: Gordhan L. Patel Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2002 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Several people were instrumental in the completion of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Coins and Power in Late Iron Age Britain
    JOHN CREIGHTON Coins and Power in Late Iron Age Britain published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, UK www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York ny 10011–4211, USA www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarco´n 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain © John Creighton 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press First published 2000 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeset in Plantin 10/12pt [vn] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library isbn 0 521 77207 9 hardback CONTENTS List of Wgures page viii List of tables x Preface xi Acknowledgements xii List of abbreviations xiii Note on translations used xiv Introduction 1 1 The Middle to Late Iron Age transition 4 2 Coin and the representation of individual authority 22 3 The Southern and Eastern kingdoms 55 4 Classical imagery and ideology in Britain 80 5 The location of Britain in the Roman world 126 6 Legends and language 146 7 Dynasties and identities 174 8 Conclusion and epilogue: from Britain to Britannia 216 Appendix: A brief introduction to Iron Age coinage in Britain 222 References 228 Index of coin types 238 General index 241 vii FIGURES Fig. 2.1 The development of coinage in northern Europe from the Phillipus to its regional successors page 27 Fig.
    [Show full text]