DOCSLIB.ORG

Clark's Nutcracker (Nucifraga Columbiana)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THREE HIGH LATITUDE RESIDENT CORVIDS: CLARK’S NUTCRACKER (NUCIFRAGA COLUMBIANA), EURASIAN NUTCRACKER (NUCIFRAGA CARYOCATACTES), AND GRAY JAY (PERISOREUS CANADENSIS) KIMBERLY MARGARET DOHMS Bachelor of Science Honours, University of Regina, 2001 Masters of Science, University of Regina, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Lethbridge in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Biological Sciences University of Lethbridge LETHBRIDGE, ALBERTA, CANADA © Kimberly M. Dohms, 2016 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THREE HIGH LATITUDE RESIDENT CORVIDS: CLARK’S NUTCRACKER (NUCIFRAGA COLUMBIANA), EURASIAN NUTCRACKER (NUCIFRAGA CARYOCATACTES), AND GRAY JAY (PERISOREUS CANADENSIS) KIMBERLY MARGARET DOHMS Date of Defense: November 30, 2015 Dr. T. Burg Associate Professor Ph.D Supervisor Dr. A. Iwaniuk Associate Professor Ph.D Thesis Examination Committee Member Dr. C. Goater Professor Ph.D Thesis Examination Committee Member Dr. D. Logue Assistant Professor Ph.D Internal Examiner Dr. K. Omland Professor Ph.D External Examiner University of Maryland, Baltimore County Baltimore, Maryland Dr. J. Thomas Professor Ph.D Chair, Thesis Examination Committee DEDICATION For the owl and the pussy cat. (And also the centipede.) iii GENERAL ABSTRACT High latitude resident bird species provide an unique opportunity to investigate patterns of postglacial and barrier-mediated dispersal. In this study, multiple genetic markers were used to understand postglacial colonization by and contemporary barriers to gene flow in three corvids. Clark’s nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana), Eurasian nutcracker (N. caryocatactes), and gray jay (Perisoreus canadensis) are year-round resident northern hemisphere passerines with ranges encompassing previously glaciated and unglaciated regions and potential barriers to dispersal (e.g. mountain ranges). Using mitochondrial DNA control region sequences, we found limited geographic genetic structure and one glacial refugium in nutcrackers, contrasting with seven distinct genetic groups and five refugia for gray jays. Nuclear microsatellite markers revealed additional and contrasting patterns of near-panmixia in nutcrackers and multiple hierarchical breaks in gray jays. Genetic patterns are explained by differences in natural history traits, specifically food preferences, for these species. iv THESIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Science is a way of life. Science is a perspective. Science is the process that takes us from confusion to understanding in a manner that's precise, predictive and reliable - a transformation, for those lucky enough to experience it, that is empowering and emotional. Brian Greene As I write these acknowledgements and reflect upon this project, I could never have predicted how true Greene’s words would become. I suggest, though, that the scientist is not the only one that goes through this journey; she also takes a lot of people along for the ride. For all of those who were there for part or all of this process, I want to express my immense gratitude. Thank you to my supervisor, Theresa Burg, for taking on a student with so little phylogeography knowledge and encouraging me to make this project my own. This was not always an easy journey for either of us, but I am ultimately grateful that we both stuck with it. Thank you for continuing to believe that I could and would complete this thesis. Thank you to my supervisory committee, Andrew Iwaniuk and Andrew Hurly, for your excellent questions and feedback throughout this process. Special thanks to Cameron Goater for providing me with a second lab home and stepping in as Andy’s replacement on my committee upon his retirement. My experience at the University of Lethbridge will not soon be forgotten for the influence it has had on me as a biologist; my thanks to all of you for being a part of that. v Thank you to my field assistants, Leah, Heather, and Kayleigh, who made every dawn chorus just a little easier to get up for and accompanied me in my mad desire to eat well while we lived out of Scarlett’s canopy. Massive thanks to my labmates, Brendan (the sweetest, surliest wombat and friend I could ever ask for), Paulo (thanks for the mouse!), John (many late night chats, much music, and scotch), and so many others who shared that special time that is grad school. To my “little lab brother”, Michael B., the source of many bear hugs and constant lively debates: I promise not to hold your love of Harper against you, too much. Endless thanks to Melissa, my academic wife, for everything, especially for making me feel like part of your Lethbridge family. Thank you, Sarah, for being my insomniac work friend, rainbow sock buddy, and endless source of inspiring bird media. My kindred (lady grad student) spirits, Lori P., Janet N., Jennifer D., Alice M., Sue B., Kimberly G., Leslie S., Tanya S., Elly K., and Mikaela D.: thank you for sharing in the struggles and the moments that defined this trip we all shared; your existence in my life reminds me to keep fighting the good fight. To my parents and my Baba: thank you for always telling me I could do anything I wanted for a career and for believing in me, even when you were really unsure about my decisions. Thank you for continuing to ask me if I was “done yet” and, “when [I would] finally stop going to school”; even though I may have seemed annoyed by your reminders, they kept me from packing it all in on a few occasions. I think this is the day you were waiting for...probably. Guess what, vi Mom? I am going to be a doctor, just not quite the type you thought; at least I can still help you ID all those backyard birds. Dad, thank you for always reminding me to check my oil and fluids, keep my engine tuned, and be creative and frugal in solutions to any of my problems, mechanical and otherwise. Baba, thank you, again, for fueling another grad degree with perogies and unconditional love. Thank you to my “little” sister, Angela, for trying to understand my biologist brain and always greeting that with dark humour and baking. It is not an easy brain to figure out, yet you keep trying, stubborn Dohms girl. To those who I met along this journey that left an impression on me, thank you: Cuatro and Gracie (for the heart opening, the music, and the Colorado love), Darroch (for bird nerd talk, advice, so much coffee, and Gros Morne home place), Marc (for the music and intense nerding out sessions), Jackson (for the Waskesiu adventures and the Tour de Fish), and Robin in San Bernadino, California (for all of the local help and continued cheerleading). Thank you, Kevin and Jeremy, for your sage post-doc words, adventurous spirits, and always open doors. Thank you, Mike, for all of the birding and other adventures, for encouraging me to move to Vancouver, and for introducing me to a community that would become my home. To my chosen Vancouver family and community: I cannot properly express my gratitude to you for providing me with a physical and heart home. To Cole: how do I even begin to thank you for all of your encouragement, care, vii communication, music, and perfect sunny side up eggs? Your appearance in my life was unexpected and a total game changer. Never stop holding me to the standards you do. And last, but never least: to Jordan, my BFF, who has been there for this whole trip. I could go on for chapters about all of the ways you have supported and helped me through this process. This has been a “Slow Show”, for certain, and your tough love, kindness, patience, and reality checks have been there every step of the way. If it were possible, all of you would be authors on this thesis. This science, this “way of life”, would not have happened without you. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication ..................................................................................................................................... iii GENERAL ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................. iv THESIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... xii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... xiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS, AND SYMBOLS ........................................ xiv Chapter 1: General introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Phylogeography .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Barriers to gene flow .......................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Behavioural/natural history ....................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Physical/geographic .................................................................................................... 3 1.2.2.1 North America ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2.2.2 Eurasia ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Pleistocene glaciations ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 04. Ecological Relationships Lesson #3: CLARK THE

    04. Ecological Relationships Lesson #3: CLARK THE

    Ecological Relationships Lesson #3: CLARK THE NUTCRACKER SOverviewTORY: This introduces the art of creating a species account. The account identifies the important qualities of a species through a scientific drawing. This then leads to exploration of the interrelationship of the Clark’s Nutcracker (a type of woodpecker) and the whitebark pine. Learner Outcomes Getting Ready Youth will: Materials: Youth need journals and writing utensils; staff need 1. Know how to complete a species account colored pencils, poker chips, and handouts. identifying the important species Preparation: For the “Made for Each Other” activity, set up the characteristics through a scientific whitebark pine food sources in 4 piles of poker chips and spread drawing. them out in the center of the area. The three cache sites should 2. Know the life history of the Clark’s not be more than seven feet apart and should be on the outside Nutcracker. circle of the food source. Assign cache sites to each group. Use 3. Understand mutualism in the ecological different objects to mark the cache sites. context of Yellowstone National Park. Location: A large area (25 x 25 yards) would be preferable for 4. Know how to define whitebark pine the “Made for Each Other” activity. An ideal location would ecosystem functions. have whitebark pines and/or Clark’s Nutcracker activity. Background The following material is not required to instruct this lesson. Adapted from Yellowstone Resources and Issues Handbook: 2013. Forest Insect Pest The conifer trees of Yellowstone face many threats, however the most damaging one is the native pine bark beetle. It is indicated that this species has been around for centuries.
  • There's No Place Like Home

    There's No Place Like Home

    United States Department of Agriculture There’s No Place Like Home: D E E Forest Service P R A R U TM U LT ENT OF AGRIC Pacific Northwest Region Clark’s Nutcracker Home Ranges and 2011 Whitebark Pine Regeneration FOR CLARK’S nutcrackers, “home” is a year-round hub. What do we mean by “space use” and “home range”? Although nutcrackers show tenacious fidelity to home ranges in winter, spring, and summer, they spend every “Space use” describes how animals use a landscape. The term autumn traveling around to harvest seeds. Nearly all seeds is most commonly used to discuss home range characteristics are transported back home for storage, a process that has and the selection of resources (habitats, food items, roost sites) vast implications for forest regeneration. within home ranges. In our study, we used the term “home range” to describe the BACKGROUND area used by a resident nutcracker for all year-round activities We investigated habitat use, caching behavior, and except seed harvest. This is because areas used for seed harvest migratory patterns in Clark’s nutcrackers in the Pacific in autumn were ever-changing and temporary—birds showed Northwest using radio telemetry. Over 4 years (2006– no fidelity to forests used for seed harvest, but rather used these 2009), we captured 54 adult nutcrackers at 10 sites in the forests only as long as seeds were present on trees. Cascade and Olympic Mountains in Washington State. What do we know about nutcracker space use? We fitted nutcrackers with a back-pack style harness. The battery life on the radio tags was 450 days, and Vander Wall and Balda (1977) and Tomback (1978) were the we tracked nutcrackers year-round, on foot (to obtain first to report that nutcrackers harvest large-seeded pines in behavior observations) and via aircraft (to obtain point autumn and often range over large areas and multiple elevation locations).
  • Limiting Natural Regeneration Potential of Swiss Stone Pine (Pinus Cembra L) in the Northern French Alps

    Limiting Natural Regeneration Potential of Swiss Stone Pine (Pinus Cembra L) in the Northern French Alps

    Short note Insect damage to cones and other mortality factors limiting natural regeneration potential of Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra L) in the northern French Alps L Dormont A Roques L Trosset 1 Station de zoologie forestière, CRF-Orléans, INRA, Ardon, 45160 Olivet; 2 Laboratoire dynamique des écosystèmes d’altitude, CISM, campus scientifique, université de Savoie, 73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac cedex, France (Received 21 November 1994; accepted 13 March 1995) Summary — A seed cone population of Swiss stone pine was surveyed from flower bud burst to cone maturation during 1992-1993. The potential seed crop was estimated to decrease by 84 % of the ini- tial value. Mortality was mainly caused by abiotic factors during the first year of cone development while cone insects caused most damage to second-year cones. The cone entomofauna only included three phytophagous species, and largely differed from the fauna observed in cones of other Alpine conifers. Pinus cembra / regeneration / cone insect / seed loss Résumé — Les dégats d’insectes des cônes et autres facteurs de mortalité limitant les poten- tialités de régénération naturelle du pin cembro dans les Alpes françaises du Nord. Un suivi démo- graphique de cônes de pin cembro sur un cycle reproductif complet a été réalisé en 1992 et 1993. Au total, 84 % de la production potentielle de graines a été détruite. La majorité des pertes a été causée par des facteurs abiotiques la première année, et par des insectes pour les cônes de deuxième année. L’entomofaune ne comprend que trois espèces phytophages et diffère largement de celle observée dans les autres essences des conifères alpins.
  • The Perplexing Pinyon Jay

    The Perplexing Pinyon Jay

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences Papers in the Biological Sciences 1998 The Ecology and Evolution of Spatial Memory in Corvids of the Southwestern USA: The Perplexing Pinyon Jay Russell P. Balda Northern Arizona University,, [email protected] Alan Kamil University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscibehavior Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons Balda, Russell P. and Kamil, Alan, "The Ecology and Evolution of Spatial Memory in Corvids of the Southwestern USA: The Perplexing Pinyon Jay" (1998). Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences. 17. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscibehavior/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published (as Chapter 2) in Animal Cognition in Nature: The Convergence of Psychology and Biology in Laboratory and Field, edited by Russell P. Balda, Irene M. Pepperberg, and Alan C. Kamil, San Diego (Academic Press, 1998), pp. 29–64. Copyright © 1998 by Academic Press. Used by permission. The Ecology and Evolution of Spatial Memory in Corvids of the Southwestern USA: The Perplexing Pinyon Jay Russell P. Balda 1 and Alan C. Kamil 2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Northern
  • Walker Marzluff 2017 Recreation Changes Lanscape Use of Corvids

    Walker Marzluff 2017 Recreation Changes Lanscape Use of Corvids

    Recreation changes the use of a wild landscape by corvids Author(s): Lauren E. Walker and John M. Marzluff Source: The Condor, 117(2):262-283. Published By: Cooper Ornithological Society https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-14-169.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1650/CONDOR-14-169.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Volume 117, 2015, pp. 262–283 DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-14-169.1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Recreation changes the use of a wild landscape by corvids Lauren E. Walker* and John M. Marzluff College of the Environment, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA * Corresponding author: [email protected] Submitted October 24, 2014; Accepted February 13, 2015; Published May 6, 2015 ABSTRACT As urban areas have grown in population, use of nearby natural areas for outdoor recreation has also increased, potentially influencing bird distribution in landscapes managed for conservation.
  • Individual Repeatability, Species Differences, and The

    Individual Repeatability, Species Differences, and The

    Supplementary Materials: Individual repeatability, species differences, and the influence of socio-ecological factors on neophobia in 10 corvid species SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 2 Figure S1 . Latency to touch familiar food in each round, across all conditions and species. Round 3 differs from round 1 and 2, while round 1 and 2 do not differ from each other. Points represent individuals, lines represent median. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 3 Figure S2 . Site effect on latency to touch familiar food in azure-winged magpie, carrion crow and pinyon jay. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 4 Table S1 Pairwise comparisons of latency data between species Estimate Standard error z p-value Blue jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.491 0.209 2.351 0.019 Carrion crow - Azure-winged magpie -0.496 0.177 -2.811 0.005 Clark’s nutcracker - Azure-winged magpie 0.518 0.203 2.558 0.011 Common raven - Azure-winged magpie -0.437 0.183 -2.392 0.017 Eurasian jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.284 0.166 1.710 0.087 ’Alal¯a- Azure-winged magpie 0.416 0.144 2.891 0.004 Large-billed crow - Azure-winged magpie 0.668 0.189 3.540 0.000 New Caledonian crow - Azure-winged magpie -0.316 0.209 -1.513 0.130 Pinyon jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.118 0.170 0.693 0.488 Carrion crow - Blue jay -0.988 0.199 -4.959 0.000 Clark’s nutcracker - Blue jay 0.027 0.223 0.122 0.903 Common raven - Blue jay -0.929 0.205 -4.537 0.000 Eurasian jay - Blue jay -0.207 0.190 -1.091 0.275 ’Alal¯a- Blue jay -0.076 0.171 -0.443 0.658 Large-billed crow - Blue jay 0.177 0.210 0.843 0.399 New Caledonian crow - Blue jay -0.808 0.228 -3.536
  • Zoologische Verhandelingen

    Zoologische Verhandelingen

    Systematic notes on Asian birds. 45. Types of the Corvidae E.C. Dickinson, R.W.R.J. Dekker, S. Eck & S. Somadikarta With contributions by M. Kalyakin, V. Loskot, H. Morioka, C. Violani, C. Voisin & J-F. Voisin Dickinson, E.C., R.W.R.J. Dekker, S. Eck & S. Somadikarta. Systematic notes on Asian birds. 45. Types of the Corvidae. Zool. Verh. Leiden 350, 26.xi.2004: 111-148.— ISSN 0024-1652/ISBN 90-73239-95-8. Edward C. Dickinson, c/o The Trust for Oriental Ornithology, Flat 3, Bolsover Court, 19 Bolsover Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN20 7JG, U.K. (e-mail: [email protected]). René W.R.J. Dekker, National Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected]). Siegfried Eck, Staatliche Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Tierkunde, A.B. Meyer Bau, Königsbrücker Landstrasse 159, D-01109 Dresden, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]. sachsen.de). Soekarja Somadikarta, Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University of Indonesia, Depok Campus, Depok 16424, Indonesia (e-mail: [email protected]). Mikhail V. Kalyakin, Zoological Museum, Moscow State University, Bol’shaya Nikitskaya Str. 6, Moscow, 103009, Russia (e-mail: [email protected]). Vladimir M. Loskot, Department of Ornithology, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russia (e-mail: [email protected]). Hiroyuki Morioka, Curator Emeritus, National Science Museum, Hyakunin-cho 3-23-1, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 100, Japan. Carlo Violani, Department of Biology, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy (e-mail: [email protected]).
  • Long-Tailed Duck Clangula Hyemalis and Red-Breasted Goose Branta Ruficollis: Two New Birds for Sichuan, with a Review of Their Distribution in China

    Long-Tailed Duck Clangula Hyemalis and Red-Breasted Goose Branta Ruficollis: Two New Birds for Sichuan, with a Review of Their Distribution in China

    138 SHORT NOTES Forktail 28 (2012) Table 1 lists 17 species that have similar global ranges to Bar- Delacour, J. (1930) On the birds collected during the fifth expedition to winged Wren Babbler, and which therefore could conceivably be French Indochina. Ibis (12)6: 564–599. resident in the Hoang Lien Mountains. All these species are resident Delacour, J. & Jabouille, P. (1930) Description de trente oiseaux de in the eastern Himalayas of north-east India, northern Myanmar, l’Indochina Française. L’Oiseau 11: 393–408. and Yunnan and Sichuan provinces of China. Species only rarely Delacour, J. & Jabouille, P. (1931) Les oiseaux de l’Indochine française, Tome recorded in northern Myanmar (e.g. Rufous-breasted Accentor III. Paris: Exposition Coloniale Internationale. Prunella strophiata) are excluded, as are those that do not occur in Eames, J. C. & Ericson, P. G. P. (1996) The Björkegren expeditions to French Sichuan (e.g. Grey-sided Laughingthrush Garrulax caerulatus and Indochina: a collection of birds from Vietnam and Cambodia. Nat. Hist. Cachar Wedge-billed Babbler Sphenocichla roberti), although of Bull. Siam Soc. 44: 75–111. course such species might also conceivably occur in Vietnam. Eames, J. C. & Mahood S. P. (2011) Little known Asian bird: White-throated Similarly, species that share a similar distribution to another rare Wren-babbler Rimator pasqueri: Vietnam’s rarest endemic passerine? Fan Si Pan resident—Red-winged Laughingthrush Garrulax BirdingASIA 15: 58–61. formosus—but currently only occur in Sichuan and Yunnan are Kinnear, N. B. (1929) On the birds collected by Mr. H. Stevens in northern excluded, because they do not occur in north-east India and Tonkin in 1923–1924.
  • Milieu Cembro.Ai

    Milieu Cembro.Ai

    LaLa ccembraieembraie (pin(pin cembro)cembro) Forests of Swiss Pine 7 Vaccinium myrtillus (myrtille), Vaccinium gaultheroides (airelle à Ericaceae petites feuilles), Ericaceae Ces forêts claires de pin cembro ou arolle (Pinus cembra) se rencontrent à l’étage subalpin, en versant d’ubac et sur silice. Autour du jardin Le Bois des Ayes (commune de Les espèces caractéristiques sont des Ericacées Villard-Saint-Pancrace) est la seule (rhododendron, myrtille, airelle à petites feuilles) et la poacée forêt pure de pin cembro de la Calamagrostis villosa. Le pin cembro se distingue par ses région. Une réserve biologique forestière a été créée en 1990 pour aiguilles groupées par cinq (par deux chez les autres espèces protéger ses arbres pluricentenaires. Pinus cembra (pin cembro, arolle), françaises de pins) et par ses graines qui ne sont pas Dans le massif du Queyras, le bois Pinaceae disséminées par le vent mais par un oiseau, le casse-noix tendre du cembro est utilisé depuis des siècles pour réaliser des meubles moucheté. et des objets sculptés. These open forests of Swiss or Arolla Pine (Pinus cembra) are found in the subalpine zone, on north facing slopes and on acidic substrates. Characteristic species of these forests include species of Ericacea (rhododendron, blueberry, northern bilberry) and the grass Calamagrostis villosa. The Swiss Pine is recognised by its needles being grouped in fives (grouped by two in other pine Nucifraga caryocatactes species in France) and by the fact that its seeds are transported not by wind, (casse-noix), Corvidae © Pierre TOSCANI / Naturimages but by a bird, the spotted nutcracker. LesLes combescombes à nneigeeige Snowbeds 3838 Salix herbacea (saule nain), Soldanella alpina (soldanelle Salicaceae des Alpes), Primulaceae Il s'agit de dépressions qui restent enneigées une grande partie Autour du jardin crête de l'année, suite aux accumulations de neige par le vent.
  • Tourist Guide Gauja National Park

    Tourist Guide Gauja National Park

    EN TOURIST GUIDE GAUJA NATIONAL PARK SIGULDA, LĪGATNE, CĒSIS, VALMIERA, PĀRGAUJA, AMATA, INČUKALNS, KOCĒNI, PRIEKUĻI www.entergauja.com View the most detailed information on travel options in the Gauja National Park at www.entergauja.com TABLE OF CONTENT Gauja National Park 2 • Plan your trip at Gauja National Park, pick natural, cultural and historical objects Gauja Travel Around 3 and add them to your route Spawning of Salmon-like Fish in Gauja National Park 4 • Choose your type of active leisure • Find out the latest information about events and festivals Mushrooms of Gauja National Park 5 • Get information on best hotels, guest houses and campings of the Gauja National Bird Watching in Gauja National Park 6 Park, and make reservations Hiking Routes 7 • Explore the gourmand offers of the restaurants and pubs of the Gauja National Park Sigulda Cycling Routes 10 • View the chosen objects on a map, create and print a PDF file or save a GPX file, and open it on your smartphone Cēsis Cycling Routes 12 • Explore 30 natural tourism routes for walking, cycling, boating and driving Valmiera Cycling Routes 14 • View the weekend and holiday packages Water Routes 16 • View photographs and videos of the selected places • Download tour guides and brochures Enter Nature 17 Enter Action 20 Create your own hike, bike ride or boating route with the routing system Enter Winter 22 that covers roads, paths and rivers in the length of approx. 1800 km Gauja Info 24 Enter Manors 26 Enter History 30 Enter Crafts and Traditional Culture 32 Enter Eco-welness
  • British Birds |

    British Birds |

    VOL. LI DECEMBER No. 12 1958 BRITISH BIRDS CONCEALMENT AND RECOVERY OF FOOD BY BIRDS, WITH SOME RELEVANT OBSERVATIONS ON SQUIRRELS By T. J. RICHARDS THE FOOD-STORING INSTINCT occurs in a variety of creatures, from insects to Man. The best-known examples are found in certain Hymenoptera (bees, ants) and in rodents (rats, mice, squirrels). In birds food-hoarding- has become associated mainly with the highly-intelligent Corvidae, some of which have also acquired a reputation for carrying away and hiding inedible objects. That the habit is practised to a great extent by certain small birds is less generally known. There is one familiar example, the Red- backed Shrike (Lanius cristatus collurio), but this bird's "larder" does not fall into quite the same category as the type of food- storage with which this paper is concerned. Firstly, the food is not concealed and therefore no problem arises regarding its recovery, and secondly, since the bird is a summer-resident, the store cannot serve the purpose of providing for the winter months. In the early autumn of 1948, concealment of food by Coal Tit (Parns ater), Marsh Tit (P. palustris) and Nuthatch (Sitta enropaea) was observed at Sidmouth, Devon (Richards, 1949). Subsequent observation has confirmed that the habit is common in these species and has also shown that the Rook (Corvus jrngilegus) will bury acorns [Querents spp.) in the ground, some- • times transporting the food to a considerable distance before doing so. This paper is mainly concerned with the food-storing behaviour of these four species, and is a summary of observations made intermittently between 1948 and 1957 in the vicinity of Sidmouth.
  • Testing Two Competing Hypotheses for Eurasian Jays' Caching for the Future

    Testing Two Competing Hypotheses for Eurasian Jays' Caching for the Future

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Testing two competing hypotheses for Eurasian jays’ caching for the future Piero Amodio1,2,6*, Johanni Brea3,6, Benjamin G. Farrar1,4, Ljerka Ostojić1,4,5 & Nicola S. Clayton1 Previous research reported that corvids preferentially cache food in a location where no food will be available or cache more of a specifc food in a location where this food will not be available. Here, we consider possible explanations for these prospective caching behaviours and directly compare two competing hypotheses. The Compensatory Caching Hypothesis suggests that birds learn to cache more of a particular food in places where that food was less frequently available in the past. In contrast, the Future Planning Hypothesis suggests that birds recall the ‘what–when–where’ features of specifc past events to predict the future availability of food. We designed a protocol in which the two hypotheses predict diferent caching patterns across diferent caching locations such that the two explanations can be disambiguated. We formalised the hypotheses in a Bayesian model comparison and tested this protocol in two experiments with one of the previously tested species, namely Eurasian jays. Consistently across the two experiments, the observed caching pattern did not support either hypothesis; rather it was best explained by a uniform distribution of caches over the diferent caching locations. Future research is needed to gain more insight into the cognitive mechanism underpinning corvids’ caching for the future. Over the last two decades, an increasing number of studies in non-human animals have challenged the view that future planning abilities are uniquely human (primates:1–5; corvids:6–9; rodents:10,11, although see2).