DOCSLIB.ORG

Air & Space Power Journal, July-August 2012, Volume 26, No. 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air & Space Power Journal, July-August 2012, Volume 26, No. 4 July–August 2012 Volume 26, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 International Feature Embracing the Moon in the Sky or Fishing the Moon in the Water? ❙ 4 Some Thoughts on Military Deterrence: Its Effectiveness and Limitations Sr Col Xu Weidi, Research Fellow, Institute for Strategic Studies, National Defense University, People’s Liberation Army, China Features Toward a Superior Promotion System ❙ 24 Maj Kyle Byard, USAF, Retired Ben Malisow Col Martin E. B. France, USAF KWar ❙ 45 Cyber and Epistemological Warfare—Winning the Knowledge War by Rethinking Command and Control Mark Ashley From the Air ❙ 61 Rediscovering Our Raison D’être Dr. Adam B. Lowther Dr. John F. Farrell Departments 103 ❙ Views The Importance of Airpower in Supporting Irregular Warfare in Afghanistan ....................................... 103 Col Bernie Willi, USAF Whither the Leading Expeditionary Western Air Powers in the Twenty-First Century? .................................. 118 Group Capt Tim D. Q. Below, Royal Air Force Exchanging Business Cards: The Impact of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 on Domestic Disaster Response ........ 124 Col John L. Conway III, USAF, Retired 129 ❙ Historical Highlight Air Officer’s Education Captain Robert O’Brien 149 ❙ Ricochets & Replies 161 ❙ Book Reviews Stopping Mass Killings in Africa: Genocide, Airpower, and Intervention . .161 Douglas C. Peifer, PhD, ed. Reviewer: 2d Lt Morgan Bennett Truth, Lies, and O-Rings: Inside the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster . 164 Allan J. McDonald with James R. Hansen Reviewer: Mel Staffeld Allies against the Rising Sun: The United States, the British Nations, and the Defeat of Imperial Japan . 165 Nicholas Evan Sarantakes Reviewer: Lt Col John L. Minney, Alabama Air National Guard Rivals: How the Power Struggle between China, India, and Japan Will Shape Our Next Decade . 168 Bill Emmott Reviewer: Capt Joe G. Biles, USAF The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America’s War in Afghanistan . 171 Michael Hastings Reviewer: Col Matthew C. Brand, USAF The Rise and Fall of Al-Qaeda . 174 Fawaz A. Gerges Reviewer: Dr. Mary N. Hampton Airpower for Strategic Effect . 177 Colin S. Gray Reviewer: Benjamin S. Lambeth, PhD Golden Nuggets: A Practitioner’s Reflections on Leadership, Management and Life . .180 Dr. Raymond A. Shulstad Reviewer: Dr. Amir S. Gohardani Shooting the Front: Allied Aerial Reconnaissance and Photographic Interpretation on the Western Front—World War I . 181 Terrence J. Finnegan Reviewer: Dr. James Titus July–August 2012 Air & Space Power Journal | 2 Editorial Advisory Board Gen John A. Shaud, PhD, USAF, Retired, Air Force Research Institute Lt Gen Bradley C. Hosmer, USAF, Retired Dr. J. Douglas Beason (Senior Executive Service and Colonel, USAF, Retired), Air Force Space Command Dr. Alexander S. Cochran, Office of the Chief of Staff, US Army Prof. Thomas B. Grassey, US Naval Academy Lt Col Dave Mets, PhD, USAF, Retired, School of Advanced Air and Space Studies (professor emeritus) Board of Reviewers Lt Col Eric Braganca, USAF Col Merrick E. Krause, USAF, Retired Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Maryland Department of Homeland Security Dr. Kendall K. Brown Col Chris J. Krisinger, USAF, Retired NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Burke, Virginia Dr. Clayton K. S. Chun Dr. Benjamin S. Lambeth US Army War College RAND Dr. Mark Clodfelter Mr. Douglas E. Lee National War College Air Force Space Command Dr. Conrad Crane Dr. Richard I. Lester Director, US Army Military History Institute Eaker Center for Professional Development Col Dennis M. Drew, USAF, Retired Mr. Brent Marley USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Redstone Arsenal, Alabama (professor emeritus) Mr. Rémy M. Mauduit Maj Gen Charles J. Dunlap Jr., USAF, Retired Air Force Research Institute Duke University Col Phillip S. Meilinger, USAF, Retired Dr. Stephen Fought West Chicago, Illinois USAF Air War College (professor emeritus) Dr. Daniel Mortensen Col Richard L. Fullerton, USAF Air Force Research Institute USAF Academy Dr. Richard R. Muller Lt Col Derrill T. Goldizen, PhD, USAF, Retired USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Westport Point, Massachusetts Dr. Bruce T. Murphy Col Mike Guillot, USAF, Retired Air University Editor, Strategic Studies Quarterly Col Robert Owen, USAF, Retired Air Force Research Institute Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. John F. Guilmartin Jr. Lt Col Brian S. Pinkston, USAF, MC, SFS Ohio State University The Pentagon Dr. Amit Gupta Col Bob Potter, USAF, Retired USAF Air War College Pensacola, Florida Dr. Grant T. Hammond Dr. Steve Rothstein USAF Center for Strategy and Technology Colorado Springs Science Center Project Dr. Dale L. Hayden Lt Col Reagan E. Schaupp, USAF Air Force Research Institute Naval War College Mr. James Hoffman Dr. Barry Schneider Rome Research Corporation Director, USAF Counterproliferation Center Milton, Florida Professor, USAF Air War College Dr. Thomas Hughes Col Richard Szafranski, USAF, Retired USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Toffler Associates Lt Col Jeffrey Hukill, USAF, Retired Lt Col Edward B. Tomme, PhD, USAF, Retired Air Force Research Institute CyberSpace Operations Consulting Lt Col J. P. Hunerwadel, USAF, Retired Dr. Christopher H. Toner LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education University of St. Thomas Col Mark P. Jelonek, USAF Lt Col David A. Umphress, PhD, USAFR, Retired Air Force Space Command Auburn University Col John Jogerst, USAF, Retired Col Mark E. Ware Navarre, Florida Twenty-Fourth Air Force Mr. Charles Tustin Kamps Dr. Harold R. Winton USAF Air Command and Staff College USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Dr. Tom Keaney Johns Hopkins University July–August 2012 Air & Space Power Journal | 3 International Feature Embracing the Moon in the Sky or Fishing the Moon in the Water? Some Thoughts on Military Deterrence: Its Effectiveness and Limitations Sr Col Xu Weidi, Research Fellow, Institute for Strategic Studies, National Defense University, People’s Liberation Army, China* eterrence as a military strategic concept came along after the debut of nuclear weapons. For more than 60 years, it has evolved into one of the most frequently used—and abused— Dconcepts in the games of international politics and military services. In the meantime, numerous related theories, ideas, and notions have branched out.1 Exactly what is deterrence—its nature, effectiveness, *This article is based on the author’s notes for a series of lectures given to officers at the Tanzanian National Defense College. A slightly different Chinese version appeared in the November 2010 issue of 中国战略观察 (China Strategic Review). The author wishes to thank Mr. Jiang Guocheng, editor of Air and Space Power Journal–Chinese, for his skillful draft English translation. July–August 2012 Air & Space Power Journal | 4 International Feature Xu Weidi Embracing the Moon in the Sky or Fishing the Moon in the Water? and limitations? How and why is the concept often miscomprehended and misinterpreted, and why has it evolved to become something mythical? What effects has it had on the global security environment? And how should the militaries of developing nations view and employ deterrence? This article tries to answer these questions. Three Components of Deterrence In international strategy studies, the general view on deterrence holds that it is a country’s threat to use force to prevent an adversary from taking damaging actions against it. Back in 1957, in his book Nu­ clear Weapons and Foreign Policy, Henry Kissinger identified three com­ ponents of deterrence: “Deterrence requires a combination of power, the will to use it, and the assessment of these by the potential aggres­ sor. Moreover, deterrence is the product of those factors and not the sum. If any one of them is zero, deterrence fails.”2 In the following de­ cades, Kissinger’s formula of deterrence has remained true and broadly appreciated. As such, this article adopts his formula. After ex­ ploring this line of thinking and focusing on the three components that Kissinger identified, one may arrive at three inferences.3 First, deterrence is not unilateral military actions; rather, it is a compli­ cated process of interactions between the opposing parties. Furthermore, unlike ordinary military actions, the success of deterrence—the pro­ duction of desired effects—does not depend on the superiority of the deterrer over the deterred. Second, deterrence inherently and tightly links to military threats. The deterring state implements deterrence via a threat to use force in an attempt to compel the adversary to give up conspired or construed hostile plans or actions. In this sense, so-called military deterrence is no less and no more than threatening the opponent with force. However, in an international society made up of sovereign states, the deterred nations often counter such military threats in kind, turning deterrence from unilateral to mutual, unequal as they may be. From what has happened July–August 2012 Air & Space Power Journal | 5 International Feature Xu Weidi Embracing the Moon in the Sky or Fishing the Moon in the Water? to date, to deem the deterrence concept a theoretical source of most of the international crises in the Cold War years is not an overstatement. Third, deterrence as a strategic concept is inherent in the gene of fail­ ure. In the face of military threats, if the state being deterred does not take the damaging actions presumed by the deterring state, the latter may assume that its deterrence strategy has worked. However, how can the deterring state be so sure that what has not happened is a positive result of its deterrence? Honest evidence won’t come from the deterred state; the deterring state may use some human intelligence or technical means to collect evidence, which is usually insufficient for the deterring state to measure the effectiveness of its deterrence strategy. In contrast, it is fairly easy to determine the failure of this same strategy: all one needs to know is that the deterred state ignores the military threats and keeps following its course of action.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Us Military Assistance to Saudi Arabia, 1942-1964
    DANCE OF SWORDS: U.S. MILITARY ASSISTANCE TO SAUDI ARABIA, 1942-1964 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bruce R. Nardulli, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2002 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Adviser Professor Peter L. Hahn _______________________ Adviser Professor David Stebenne History Graduate Program UMI Number: 3081949 ________________________________________________________ UMI Microform 3081949 Copyright 2003 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ____________________________________________________________ ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road PO Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 ABSTRACT The United States and Saudi Arabia have a long and complex history of security relations. These relations evolved under conditions in which both countries understood and valued the need for cooperation, but also were aware of its limits and the dangers of too close a partnership. U.S. security dealings with Saudi Arabia are an extreme, perhaps unique, case of how security ties unfolded under conditions in which sensitivities to those ties were always a central —oftentimes dominating—consideration. This was especially true in the most delicate area of military assistance. Distinct patterns of behavior by the two countries emerged as a result, patterns that continue to this day. This dissertation examines the first twenty years of the U.S.-Saudi military assistance relationship. It seeks to identify the principal factors responsible for how and why the military assistance process evolved as it did, focusing on the objectives and constraints of both U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • TPP-2014-08-Power Struggle
    20 INTERNATIONAL PARKING INSTITUTE | AUGUST 2014 POWER STRUGGLE Charger squatting is coming to a space near you. Are you ready? By Kim Fernandez HAPPENS ALL THE TIME: Driving down the road, you glance at your fuel gauge to see it’s nearly empty. You pull into the gas station, line up behind IT the car at the pump, and see there’s nobody there actually pumping gas. Maybe that driver is in the convenience store or the restroom or off wandering the neighborhood—who knows? But they’re not refueling; they are blocking the pump, heaven only knows how long they’ll be gone, and you still need gas. Frustrating? You bet. Now transfer that scenario to a parking garage or lot, swap out your SUV for a Nissan Leaf, and picture that gas pump as an electric vehicle (EV) charger that’s blocked by a car that’s not charging. The owner could come back in an hour or a day. There’s no way to tell. But it’s the only charger in the facility, and you need it. DREAMSTIME / HEMERA / BONOTOM STUDIO / HEMERA BONOTOM DREAMSTIME The City of Santa Monica installed signage on its EV charging stations with time limits and other regulations. FRANK CHING Parking a non-charging car at a charger for hours or As EVs become more popular, squatting grows as an days is called “charger squatting,” and the resulting anger issue. Those who’ve already dealt with it say it’s still fairly that builds up in a driver who needs it has been christened new ground, but there are some ways to discourage parking “charger rage.” Both are growing problems that will affect at chargers when a vehicle isn’t actively charging, without parking professionals if they haven’t already.
    [Show full text]
  • The Top 365 Wrestlers of 2019 Is Aj Styles the Best
    THE TOP 365 WRESTLERS IS AJ STYLES THE BEST OF 2019 WRESTLER OF THE DECADE? JANUARY 2020 + + INDY INVASION BIG LEAGUES REPORT ISSUE 13 / PRINTED: 12.99$ / DIGITAL: FREE TOO SWEET MAGAZINE ISSUE 13 Mohammad Faizan Founder & Editor in Chief _____________________________________ SENIOR WRITERS.............Nick Whitworth ..........................................Tom Yamamoto ......................................Santos Esquivel Jr SPECIAL CONTRIBUTOR....…Chuck Mambo CONTRIBUTING WRITERS........Matt Taylor ..............................................Antonio Suca ..................................................7_year_ish ARTIST………………………..…ANT_CLEMS_ART PHOTOGRAPHERS………………...…MGM FOTO .........................................Pw_photo2mass ......................................art1029njpwphoto ..................................................dasion_sun ............................................Dragon000stop ............................................@morgunshow ...............................................photosneffect ...........................................jeremybelinfante Content Pg.6……………….……...….TSM 100 Pg.28.………….DECADE AWARDS Pg.29.……………..INDY INVASION Pg.32…………..THE BIG LEAGUES THE THOUGHTS EXPRESSED IN THE MAGAZINE IS OF THE EDITOR, WRITERS, WRESTLERS & ADVERTISERS. THE MAGAZINE IS NOT RELATED TO IT. ANYTHING IN THIS MAGAZINE SHOULD NOT BE REPRODUCED OR COPIED. TSM / SEPT 2019 / 2 TOO SWEET MAGAZINE ISSUE 13 First of all I’ll like to praise the PWI for putting up a 500 list every year, I mean it’s a lot of work. Our team
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Politics, Uncertainty, and Cooperation Between Adversaries
    Enemies in Agreement: Domestic Politics, Uncertainty, and Cooperation between Adversaries The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Vaynman, Jane Eugenia. 2014. Enemies in Agreement: Domestic Politics, Uncertainty, and Cooperation between Adversaries. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13070027 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Enemies in Agreement: Domestic Politics, Uncertainty, and Cooperation between Adversaries Adissertationpresented by Jane Eugenia Vaynman to The Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts July 2014 c 2014 – Jane Eugenia Vaynman All rights reserved. DissertationAdvisor: ProfessorBethSimmons JaneEugeniaVaynman Enemies in Agreement: Domestic Politics, Uncertainty, and Cooperation between Adversaries Abstract Adversarial agreements, such as the nuclear weapons treaties, disarmament zones, or conventional weapons limitations, vary considerably in the information sharing provisions they include. This dissertation investigates why adversarial states sometimes choose to cooperate by creating restraining
    [Show full text]
  • Student Government Embroiled in Power Struggle Student Senate
    Student government embroiled in power struggle OREXEl INSTTTUTt OF TECHNOICXJY PHILADEIPHIA, PA. VOLUME XLIV FRIDAY, JANUARY 13, 1967 NUMBER 1 Student Senate retains power over rebellious Class Council student Senate retained its role tion by David Furniss (EE ’67) Class Council expenditures. of financial domination over to delete from Senate’s consti­ By a vote of 3-27-3, Senate Class Council in defeating a mo­ tution the power to review all elected to retain this power at PENCIL IN HAND, Tony Piersanti makes constitutional objection its January 5 meeting, at which to point Furniss withdrew his re­ Council actions mode under leadership of Ho Corbin (inset). maining motions related to Class Council’s having to report to Stu­ dent Senate. Council goes its own way, Furniss defends Council Furniss moved that Art, IV, Sec. 1, No. 7 of the Senate’s appoints Senior successor constitution be deleted. The rul­ ing states that Senate has the The Class Council, maintain­ muddy the waters of the debate.” power “ to approve or disapprove ing its position that it is free The letter of resignation was not all expenditures of the classes to interpret its constitution in accepted by the Class Council through the approval of the Class the way it feels is correct un­ since in fact the proceedings Council budget.” less specifically vetoed by the before the body had declared him Furniss argued that no other Student Senate, proceeded at its im p e a c h e d . organization is required to sub- meeting last Tuesday to appoint Up until the point of his re­ mit its budget to the Senate be- a successor to the post left va­ signation, Tedesco considered Text of Tedesco’s letter — cant by the Council’s impeach­ his impeachment invalid because ment of John Tedesco (C&E 67) See page 14.
    [Show full text]
  • 89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94Th Congress an Act Uct
    89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94th Congress An Act Uct. /, 1975^ rpQ authorize certain construction at military installations, and for other purposes. [S. 1247] Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Military United States of America in Congress assenibled^ construction and guard and reserve TITLE I—ARMY forces facilities authorization acts, 1976. SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop mili­ Military tary installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, Construction rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, Authorization including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, Act, 1976. and equipment for the following acquisition and construction: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Defense Support Activity (Fargo Building), Boston, Massachu­ setts, $8,000,000. Fort Bragg, North Carolina. $13,214,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $13,680,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $10,732,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $46,281,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $870,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $31,861,000. Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, $2,892,000. Fort Ord, California, $32,209,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $54,361,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $1,685,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $14,879,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Airfield, Georgia, $39,480,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort Benning, Georgia, $44,212,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia, $633,000. Fort Gordon, Georgia, $6,945,000. Fort Jackson, South Carolina, $14,546,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky, $42,898,000. Fort Lee, Virginia, $719,000. Fort McClellan, Alabama, $41,090,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Families Foster Parent Retreats Avoiding Power Struggles in Foster Care Power Struggles Do Not Discriminate
    IN THIS ISSUE: Foster Family Matters Recruitment Moment Care Provider of the Month Foster Parent Anniversaries July 2014 Foster Family Living Between Families Foster Parent Retreats Avoiding Power Struggles in Foster Care Power struggles do not discriminate. No matter what type anxiety, neglect and apprehension which foster of parent you are – single, married, adoptive or foster, no children experience. It is vital to a foster child’s success one is immune. All parents, at one time or another, have and healthy development for a foster parent to address been sucked into a tug-of-war struggle; both sides wanting these feelings and be a consistent, loving support as the to “win” the war. Power struggles for foster parents can be child works through the residual effects of a chaotic past. especially difficult since a foster child can often state, “I Most power struggles happen after a stressful event when don’t have to listen to you; you’re not my real mom (or the child becomes focused on what he wants and proving that dad).” Foster children often struggle with trust issues and he is right. In turn, parents can become focused on winning need to feel have to control whatever they can. Gaining the argument. When you realize that you are in a power control over situations is done in an effort to not feel struggle, recognize it and take steps to get out of it. Here are completely powerless. some suggestions to avoid or get out of a power struggle: On any given day in the United States, there are more than • Remove yourself from the situation; don’t allow yourself 500,000 children in foster care.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defense Base Closure Realignment Commission
    DCN 476 THE DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION CONGRESSIONAL HEARING WASHINGTON, DC MONDAY, JUNE 12,1995 ROOM 345 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CONGRESSIONAL HEARING ROOM 345 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING TABLE OF CONTENTS Monday, June 13,1995 Tiu3 1. 1LASTER SCHEDULE -.7 YEW ,tZEAYICO 3. SOUTH C.AROLIXA 8. COLORADO C w9*COh?YECTICuT 10. FLORIDA 12. GUAM 13. .ILLINOIS 16. MAINE 17. NEW HA,WSRIRE - ., 21- - , MINNESOTA THE DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMlSSlON 1700 NORTH MOORE STREET SUITE 1425 ARLINGTON, VA 22209 703-696-0504 ALAN J. DIXON, CHAIRMAN COMMISSIONERS: AL CORNELLA REBECCA COX GEN J. B. DAVIS, USAF (RET) S. LEE KLlNG RADM BENJAMIN F. MONTOYA, USN (RET) MG JOSUE ROBLES. JR., USA (RE-T) WEND1 LOUISE STEELE OPENING STATEMENT CHAIRMAN ALAN J. DIXON HEARING TO RECEIVE CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY Washington, DC June 13,1995 GOOD MORNING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, AND WELCOME TO TODAY'S HEARING OF THE DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION. MY NAME IS ALAN J. DIXON AND I AM CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMISSION. WITH US TODAY ARE MY COLLEAGUES, COMMISSIONERS AL CORNELLA, REBECCA COX, S. LEE KLING, JOE ROBLES, AND WEND1 STEELE. OTHER COMMISSIONERS WILL BE COMING A LITTLE LATER AS MOST OF YOU KNOW, THIS COMMISSION IS HEADING INTO THE FINAL THREE WEEKS OF ITS DIFFICULT AND UNPLEASANT TASK OF ql RECOMMENDING TO THE PRESIDENT WHICH DOMESTIC MILITARY BASES SHOULD BE CLOSED OR REALIGNED. SINCE WE RECEIVED THE CLOSURE LIST FROM SECRETARY PERRY 15 WEEKS AGO, THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE HELD TEN HEARINGS HERE IN WASHINGTON, 16 REGIONAL HEARINGS AROUND THE COUNTRY, AND MADE ALMOST 200 VISITS TO SOME 75 MILITARY BASES.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact Analysis of Delayed Military Base Reuse in California
    Economic & Planning Systems Real Estate Economics Regional Economics Public Finance Land Use Policy WHITE PAPER ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF DELAYED MILITARY BASE REUSE IN CALIFORNIA Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. January 2007 Update EPS #17002 B E R K E L E Y S A C R A M E N T O D E N V E R 2501 Ninth St., Suite 200 Phone: 510-841-9190 Phone: 916-649-8010 Phone: 303-623-3557 Berkeley, CA 94710-2515 Fax: 510-841-9208 Fax: 916-649-2070 Fax: 303-623-9049 www.epsys.com TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS...........................................................1 Summary of Findings...............................................................................................1 II. ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF DELAYED REUSE ..................................................7 Economic Impact Analysis.......................................................................................8 Economic Development Impacts.......................................................................9 Fiscal Impacts....................................................................................................10 III. REFERENCES .............................................................................................................12 APPENDICES Appendix A: Economic Impact Analysis of Alameda Naval Air Station Appendix B: Economic Impact Analysis of Fort Ord Military Installation Appendix C: Economic Impact Analysis of Hunter’s Point Naval Shipyard Appendix D: Economic Impact Analysis of Naval Station Treasure Island
    [Show full text]
  • Sermon Transcript
    SPIRITUAL STRONGHOLDS Power Struggle Series - Part 4 Ben Rudolph Good morning Life Fellowship. It is good to see you here this morning. Turn in your Bibles to II Corinthians Chapter 10 where we are going to be this morning. I hope that you have been enjoying this series. For the last two weeks Pastor Dan has just done an amazing job. He talked about the power over sin two weeks ago and then last week the power over schemes as we have been looking in this series on spiritual warfare. We need to realize that as we live our lives we don’t just live in the material world, we don’t just live our lives freely walking with God, but we need to understand that there is an enemy that attacks us every moment of every day. One of the reasons why we were doing this series is so that we will be aware of how the enemy works. But even more so is the reason that we can have faith in what God is doing in spite of the enemy’s attacks. Part of this series is not so that we look upon the darkness of spiritual forces, and that we get scared and we retreat; the point of this is to understand what the enemy wants to do, how he is working and how he is active, and then understand how God is working in greater ways over the enemy of darkness. Amen? (Amen.) So that is why we are studying this. One of the fears of studying spiritual warfare is that we can get so caught up in looking at what the enemy is doing we fail to look at what God is doing.
    [Show full text]