DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Protection in Nigeria: Two Decades After the Koko Incident Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Protection in Nigeria: Two Decades After the Koko Incident Dr Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law Volume 15 | Issue 1 Article 2 2009 Environmental Protection in Nigeria: Two Decades After the Koko Incident Dr. S. Gozie Ogbodo Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/annlsurvey Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Ogbodo, Dr. S. Gozie (2009) "Environmental Protection in Nigeria: Two Decades After the Koko Incident," Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law: Vol. 15: Iss. 1, Article 2. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/annlsurvey/vol15/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ogbodo: Two Decades After the Koko Incident ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN NIGERIA: TWO DECADES AFTER THE KOKO INCIDENT DR. S. GOZIE OGBODO* I. INTRODUCTION Prior to June 1988, Nigeria responded to most environmental problems on an ad hoc basis.l Although the Nigerian Criminal Code2 contained some provlSlons in the with respect to certain environmental infringements, such as the pollution of water sources, the burial of corpses within a hundred yards of residential home, and the sale, possession or manufacture of matches with white phosphorus,3 the code lacked any concrete national legislation dealing specifically with the ever-increasing pollution caused specifically by hazardous waste.4 Environmental legislative provisions in existence at the time were enacted in direct response to problems associated with the newly industrializing economy and the discovery and processing of oil.s * S. Gozie Ogbodo, LL. B (Hons), LL M. (U.S.A), S. 1. D (U.S.A) B.L., Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria. Formerly, Adjunct Professor, Golden Gate University, San Francisco, California. Email: [email protected]. I. lkharia1e, M. ''The Koko Incident, the Environment and the Law", in The Law and the Environment in Nigeria, Shyllon, F., ed. (lbadan, Vintage Publishers, 1989), pp. 73-75. 2. Cap 77 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1990. See Atsegbua, L, et ai., Environmental Law in Nigeria: Theory and Practice, Ababa Press 2004, 4. 3. Nigeria Criminal Code, sections pp. 245 - 248. 4. Ola, C. S., Town and Country Planning and Environmental Laws in Nigeria, 2nd ed. (lbadan, University Press, 1984), p. 165, cited in Atsegbua, L, et ai, supra, p 5. 5. Ibid, p. 56: Such environmental laws included the Oil in Navigable Waters Act 1968, Oil in Navigable Waters Regulation 1968, Petroleum Act 1969, Petroleum (Drilling and Production) Regulation 1969, Petroleum Drilling and Production (Amendment) Regulation 1973, Petroleum Refining Regulation 1974, the Oil Pipeline Act 1956, the Factories Act. Published by GGU Law Digital Commons, 2009 1 2 AnnualANNUAL Survey of International SURVEY & OF Comparative INT'L Law,& COMPo Vol. 15 [2009], LAW Iss. 1, Art.[Vol. 2 XV The discovery of toxic waste dumped in Koko, at remote part of southern Nigeria, in June 1988, and the attendant media and public outcry prompted the government to react swiftly. Through diplomatic channels, the Nigerian government succeeded in getting the Italian government and the Italian company·that was the culprit to lift the toxic waste out of the country. The Nigerian government followed this action by organizing an international workshop6 on the environment. The result was the formulation of a national policy on the environment.7 Consequently, the Federal Environmental Protection Agency 1988 (FEPA) was created and charged with the administration and enforcement of the environmental law.8 In addition, the government enacted the Harmful Waste (Special Criminal Provisions) Act, 1988, to deal specifically with illegal dumping of harmful waste.9 This article appraises the post-Koko environmental protection laws in Nigeria, with a view to assessing environmental protection mechanisms in the country. In particular, the focus is on hazardous waste!O protection under the current dispensation. Part II will examine the relevant conceptual/definitional issues. Part III will review the existing legal regimes in the country, including applicable national, regional, and international laws, as well as the common!! and case laws12 applicable in the country. Part IV will review the enforcement agencies and provisions and enforcement challenges. Part V will proffer recommendations in light of recent developments in the field of environmental law . II. CONCEPTUAL/DEFINITIONAL ISSUES In the aftermath of the 1988 Koko incident, Nigeria developed a comprehensive national policy on the environment. Prior to this incident, environmental legislation was covered under unrelated laws on distinct 6. The Nigerian government in collaboration with the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) organized the workshop from September 12 - 16, 1988. See also Aina, E. D. A and Adedipe, N. O. ed., the Making of the Nigeria Environmental Policy (Ibadan, University Press, 1991), p. 311, cited in Atsegbua, L, et af., supra, p. 57. 7. Ibid., p. 7. 8. Ibid., p. 8. See also the Federal Environmental Protection Act, 1988. It is noteworthy that the FEPA Act has been repealed by the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (Establishment) Act, 2007. 9. Ibid., p. 8. 10. Hazardous Waste is the class of waste that is dangerous to treat, keep or dispose of. It is intrinsically dangerous to human life swallowed, inhaled or if it contacts the skin. II. These are sources derivable from the law of torts, specifically; actions in negligence, actions in nuisance, actions in trespass and strict liability. 12. These are sources derivable from the interpretative functions of the court . http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/annlsurvey/vol15/iss1/2 2 2009] TWOOgbodo: DECADES Two Decades AFfER After THEthe Koko KOKO Incident INCIDENT 3 topics, for example, "wild animals," "sanitation," "National Parks," and "domestic personal hygiene."'3 A. DEFINITION OF ENVIRONMENT The term "Environment" has been given different definitions. Black's Law Dictionary'4 defines it as: "the totality of physical, economic, cultural, aesthetic, and, social circumstances and factors which surround and affect the desirability and value of property and which also affect the quality of peoples' lives." The English Dictionary'S defines the word as "the conditions under which any person or thing lives or is developed; the subtotal (I think it says sum-total) of influences which modify and determine the development of life or character." Under one Nigerian law,'6 environment is defined as "the components of the earth," and includes: (a) land, water and air, including all layers of the atmosphere, (b) all organic and inorganic matter and living organisms and, (c) the interacting natural systems that include components referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b). The first two definitions cover broad concept of "environment." In that respect, they embrace "everything within and around man that may have effect on or be affected by man; in other words, human environment as contrasted with physical environment."I7 This more expansive concept of environment is synonymous with the human environment.'s The definition under Nigerian law covers a narrower concept of "environment." This concept restricts the meaning "to the physical or natural environment, comprising God given natural resources, natural elements and natural environment whether or not modified by man."19 13. Atsegbua, L. et aI., note 2, supra. See also Ajai, 0 Law, Judiciary and the Environment in Nigeria, Perspectives in Law and Justice, Umezuilke I. A. and Nweze, C. C. ed. (Fourth Dimension Publishers), p. 240. 14. 61h edition, cited in Atsegbua, L. et al., supra. IS. Cited in Ajai, 0, supra. 16. Environmental Impact Assessment Decree of Nigeria No. 86 of 1992. 17. Ajai, 0., Law, Judiciary and the Environment in Nigeria, supra. 18. Ibid. 19. Ibid. Published by GGU Law Digital Commons, 2009 3 4 AnnualANNUAL Survey of InternationalSURVEY & OF Comparative INT'L Law,& COMPo Vol. 15 [2009], LAW Iss. 1, [Vol.Art. 2 XV This narrower concept of environment is, therefore, synonymous with the physical or natural environment.2o B. ENVIRONMENTAL LAW The concept of environmental law refers to the integrated rules and principles; i.e., legal norms, the purpose of which is to achieve environmental conservation.21 Under Nigerian law, environmental law includes all the sources of Nigerian law that impact the environment. As a federation, there are numerous sources of environmental law including the Constitution,22 International treaties, state laws, local government laws, and common law. These sources shall be more closely examined in Part III. C. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION The chief beneficiary of environmental law is mankind since the law is designed to "improve mankind's living conditions."23 Generally speaking, mankind benefits because environmental protection aims to saving mankind from itself. Unless legal checks and balances are imposed on mankind's present activities, future generations may unduly suffer for present generation's reckless environmentally damaging activity. Another goal of environmental protection is anchored on the principle that the "polluter pays."24 Under this principle, the polluter must be held liable for the consequences of his actions. This principle involves holding the polluter liable for compensatory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Polluter-Pays Principle and the Regulation of Environmental Pollution in Nigeria: Major Challenges
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3240 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3259 (Online) Vol.70, 2018 Polluter-Pays Principle and the Regulation of Environmental Pollution in Nigeria: Major Challenges Jude O. Ezeanokwasa 1 Department of International Law and Jurisprudence, Faculty of Law, Nnamdi Azikiwe Universty, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria Abstract Recognizing the internationally acclaimed efficiency of the Polluter-Pays principle (PPP) in achieving environmental protection and improvement, Nigeria adopted it as one of its principles in achieving environmental protection. The principle holds polluters responsible for the environmental degradation and pollution caused by them by getting them pay for them (pollution). To achieve the desired goal the PPP is embodied in major environmental regulations statutes, instruments and institutions in Nigeria such as the 1999 National Policy on Environment, as revised in 2016, National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA) (Establishment) Act, National Oil Spill Detection and Response (NOSDRA) (Establishment) Act, Environmental Guidelines and Standards for the Petroleum Industry in Nigeria (EGASPIN), and Mining and Minerals Act 2007. Despite the length of time that has passed from the time Nigeria adopted PPP as a key driving principle of its policy on environment, environment pollution and degradation have not abetted. They are rather on the increase as can be attested by the mountains of solid wastes littering our cities and pollution-related restiveness in the Niger Delta. This led this paper to critically inquire into the efficacy of the PPP in Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance of Oil and Gas Sector in Nigeria: Implications for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Niger Delta Region
    Governance of Oil and Gas Sector in Nigeria: Implications for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Niger Delta Region A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Felix Olufemi Ogele Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape December 2016 i Dedication To the Almighty God, the only Impartial Potentiate that commenced, sponsored, supported, and perfected everything regarding the PhD programme. He alone is the Unchangeable Changer that transforms nobody to somebody. To my wife, My Only Queen (MOQ) as she is fondly called, Oluwayinka that gave me the best children in the whole world in the persons of Yomadeoluwa, Yomolaoluwa and Yosoreoluwa that came shortly after the commencement of this research. To the memory of my late father, Pa Shadrach Elaboma Ogele and my beloved mother, Mrs. Marian Abiodun Ogele for given me the privilege to discover the mysteries of books and taught me to work while it is day, for night comes when no man can work. To the unprotected people in the coastal communities of the Niger Delta Region who for no cause of their own continue to suffer and bear the impacts of oil and gas activities in Nigeria. ii Abstract Given the persistence of environmental problems that characterise the oil producing communities (OPC) of Nigeria, often referred to as the Niger Delta region (NDR), this thesis examines the implication of the governance of oil and gas sector on the biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES) in the region. The NDR is a coastal area that is most endowed in terms of BES and hosts exploration and production of oil and gas activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Flaring and Low Carbon Development: a Comparative Analysis of Nigeria, UK and Alberta
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2019-04-25 Gas Flaring and Low Carbon Development: A Comparative Analysis of Nigeria, UK and Alberta Mene, Boritsefere Elizabeth Mene, B. E. (2019). Gas flaring and low carbon development: A comparative analysis of Nigeria, UK and Alberta (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/110232 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Gas Flaring and Low Carbon Development: A Comparative Analysis of Nigeria, Uk and Alberta by Boritsefere Elizabeth Mene A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAWS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN LAW CALGARY, ALBERTA APRIL, 2019 © Boritsefere Elizabeth Mene 2019 Abstract I bet if the environment could talk, it would have many things to say. If the environment could challenge certain actions by humankind on its person, everyone would have an earful. Sadly, the environment has no voice; it relies on environmental activists to tell its story and save it, or at least what remains of it. In this research, I tell a tale of gas flaring stemming from upstream oil and gas production in Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP Project Document Niger Delta Biodiversity Project
    UNDP Project Document Government of Nigeria Lead Agency: Federal Ministry of Environment Additional partners: Ministry of Niger Delta; Niger Delta Development Commission Ministry of Petroleum Resources; Oil Production Trade Sector, Lagos Chamber of Commerce United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Global Environment Facility (GEF) The GEF’s Strategic Programme for West Africa (SPWA) – Sub-component Biodiversity UNDP GEF PIMS no.: 2047 GEFSEC Project ID: 4090 Niger Delta Biodiversity Project Brief description This project’s goal is to contribute to the conservation and sustainable use of globally significant biological diversity in the Niger Delta. The project objective is “to mainstream biodiversity management priorities into the Niger Delta oil and gas (O&G) sector development policies and operations.” The project’s three main outcomes designed to achieve this objective are: 1) Stakeholders strengthen the governance framework of law, policy, and institutional capacity to enable the mainstreaming of biodiversity management into the O&G sector in the Niger Delta; 2) Government, the O&G industry and local communities adopt and pilot new biodiversity action planning tools for proactive biodiversity mainstreaming in the Niger Delta; 3) Stakeholders support long-term biodiversity management and the use of these new tools in the Niger Delta by capitalizing the Niger Delta Biodiversity Trust with a collaborative engagement mechanism for local communities, O&G companies and Government at its core. Each of the three outcomes of this project reflects the project’s (and UNDP’s) focus on strengthening the governance of biodiversity in the Niger Delta. By mainstreaming biodiversity into the O&G sector of the Niger Delta, the project is strengthening the governance of those resources.
    [Show full text]
  • LIMITATIONS and DRAWBACKS of NIGERIA's ENVIRONMENTAL
    International Journal of Innovative Environmental Studies Research 3(1):14-20, Jan-Mar. 2015 © SEAHI PUBLICATIONS, 2015 www.seahipaj.org ISSN: 2354-2918 LIMITATIONS AND DRAWBACKS OF NIGERIA’s ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAW (1980 – 2010) NDUONOFIT, Larry-love Effiong Department of Sociology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria [email protected] NKPAH, Young Aakpege, PhD Department of Sociology University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Port Harcourt, Nigeria [email protected] EKPENYONG, Otu Anthony, PhD Department of Sociology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Port Harcourt Choba, Port Harcourt, Nigeria [email protected] ABSTRACT Ever since the UN Stockholm conference on the environment in 1972, it took Nigeria about sixteen good years before a viable environmental protection law came upstream. Environmental laws in Nigeria where however given a boost by virtue of the Koko waste dump incidence, and since then, various laws have been enacted to protect the Nigeria environment. In spite of the existence of environmental protection laws in Nigeria, various environmental anomalies, hazardous to the health and well–being of the people and biodiversity have been on-going. The paper is a critical examination of the environmental protection laws in Nigeria. It situates the Niger Delta in this context and argues that environmental protection laws in Nigeria are ineffective because politics is at work, and issues about the environment have being politicized. It is strongly recommended here that the people and communities should demand for an EIA report before any project is carried out on their land. Also, the paper calls on the government to be responsible and accountable to the people by ensuring proper implementation of environmental laws in Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria Environmental Analysis Final Report
    NIGERIA ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT under USAID Contract No. LAG-I-00-99-00013-00 Biodiversity and Sustainable Forestry (BIOFOR) Indefinite Quantity Contract (IQC) Submitted by: ARD, Inc. 159 Bank Street, Suite 300 Burlington, Vermont 05401 telephone: (802) 658-3890 fax: (802) 658-4247 email: [email protected] April 2002 Acknowledgements Nigeria is a tremendous varied and complex country with a significant endowment of natural resources. Attempting to describe the “state of the environment” and to provide an informed analysis of the threats to the nation’s natural resources is a Herculean task. The Environmental Analysis (EA) Team believes that it has made a contribution in this regard and provided at least a snapshot of what the major environmental issues and threats are today. This contribution has relied heavily on the assistance of others—public servants, private institutions and companies, NGOs, a multitude of individuals—from across the country. We were greatly encouraged by the spirit in which we were received and the help and guidance provided by so many. We are especially indebted to the staff of USAID/Nigeria who provided us with assistance at every step while we were in Nigeria. We would especially like to thank Dr. Ravi Aulakh, the Program Economist and SO2 Team Leader for her guidance and assistance with all phases of our assignment; Mssrs. Nduka Okaro and Abdulkadir Gudugi who accompanied us on our field visits and provided invaluable networking assistance and background on the agricultural sector; Mr. John Brodman for not only tolerating us while we shared his office space, but also provided valuable insights about the energy sector and critical editorial comment; and also to Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legal Approach to Winning the 'Wash' War in Nigeria
    European Journal of Environment and Public Health 2020, 4(2), em0043 e-ISSN: 2542-4904 https://www.ejeph.com A Legal Approach to Winning the ‘Wash’ War in Nigeria Opeyemi Adewale Gbadegesin 1*, Simisola O. Akintola 1 1 Faculty of Law, University of Ibadan, NIGERIA *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Citation: Gbadegesin, O. A. and Akintola, S. O. (2020). A Legal Approach to Winning the ‘Wash’ War in Nigeria. European Journal of Environment and Public Health, 4(2), em0043. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejeph/8237 ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received: 20 Apr. 2020 Open defecation has continued to pose serious health and environmental challenges globally. This practice Accepted: 24 Apr. 2020 affects almost 1 billion people worldwide and is said to contribute significantly to an estimated 842,000 deaths resulting from sanitation related diseases. A survey conducted by UNICEF ranks Nigeria as the African country with the highest population practicing open defecation and the second next to India globally. To tackle this and to prevent an environmental and health crisis, a state of emergency was declared in the water supply, sanitation and hygiene services (WASH) sector that led to the signing of an executive order to end open defecation by 2025. The objective is to eliminate open defecation and also ensure that SDG 6 is achieved especially in the rural areas. This paper posits that achieving an open defecation free status has and still remains a primary target for the government in Nigeria at all levels and the machinery of law be deployed as a viable tool to achieve this target.
    [Show full text]
  • Land, Minerals and Environment in Nigeria: Contested Legal Issues
    ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY LAND, MINERALS AND ENVIRONMENT IN NIGERIA: CONTESTED LEGAL ISSUES EMMANUEL EDE EGBA A thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirement of Anglia Ruskin University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Submitted: January 2018 ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY ABSTRACT FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE, ARTS AND LAW DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY LAND, MINERALS AND ENVIRONMENT IN NIGERIA: CONTESTED LEGAL ISSUES EMMANUEL EDE EGBA (January 2018) This study investigates landownership, mineral and environmental contested legal issues in Nigeria. Examining aims Land Use Act gives governors control over land while Constitution leaves minerals ‘only’ to the federation, severing minerals from ‘state or private-ownership’. The Act authorises compulsory land acquisitions for public purposes including mineral exploration. But Constitution supports individual’s rights over movable or immovable property and authorises compensations for compulsory acquisitions. Nevertheless, it makes enforcement of environmental rights non-justiceable by disallowing anyone to enforcing it. The ambiguities in these laws resulted to contests of landownership, mineral control and environmental degradation which the author examines. Effects of splitting minerals from landownership caused non-passage of Petroleum Industry Bill, poor implementation of Local Content Act among others were discussed. The author adopted doctrinal methodology, implementing three techniques involving finding, reading and updating the laws to give best results. We made comparisons with other legal systems because, the thesis involves diverse legal and social doctrines. This enabled the author to comparatively analyse Nigeria landownership, mineral and environmental regimes. Researcher noted effects of ‘mineral-landownership’ split and gaps in Nigeria laws which propelled her courts to take on foreign decisions in settling mineral litigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Conflict in Nigeria: the Boko Haram Challenge
    American International Journal of Social Science Vol. 4, No. 2; April 2015 Climate Change and Conflict in Nigeria: The Boko Haram Challenge Chukwuma Onyiai School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution George mason University Arlington, Virginia Abstract This paper presents a structural and empirical analysis of the agential of the raison d’être for Nigeria’s unpreparedness to adapt to changing climate. Structures and strictures of renteir state, prebendal politics and people-unfriendly economic reforms have derailed the developmental focus of the state, and led to the emergence of self-serving, self-perpetuating political elites. This increasingly weakened the state’s capacity and sovereignty across its territory, making room only for a narrow focus on a segment of the state—the southern region—due largely to its economic importance (rent generation). These three factors fueled unprecedented capital flight from Nigeria, engendered general apathy to climate change among political office holders, and drastically impinged on the state’s capacity and willingness to pursue meaningful adaptation programs. Thus, Nigeria’s legal, policy, structural and institutional adaptive mechanisms for climate change are anything but adequate. The net effect is exposure of the vast population of farmers in northern Nigeria to harsh environmental effects, consequently generating conflict. This article makes a case for government and private sector partnership in undertaking initiatives towards addressing challenges posed by global climatic change, as a measure to stemming the tide of youth radicalization and rise of terrorist groups like Boko Haram. Keywords: Northern Nigeria, Market reform, Conflict and Inadaptiveness Introduction and Problematique Global climate change is one of the most debated issues in the global discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • National Open University of Nigeria Environmental Management and Toxicology Course Code: Emt 517 Course Title: Forest and Wildli
    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND TOXICOLOGY COURSE CODE: EMT 517 COURSE TITLE: FOREST AND WILDLIFE POLICY, LAW AND ADMINISTRATION EMT 517 FOREST AND WILDLIFE POLICY, LAW AND ADMINISTRATION CONTENTS PAGE Introduction…………………………………………………………………… ii Course Aim…………………………………………….…………… ………. iii Course Objectives………………………………………………… ………… iii Working through the Course………………………………………................. iv Course Materials………………………………………….….……………….. iv Study Units…………………………………………….…….…… …………. iv Textbooks and References……………………………………..… ………..... vi Assessment ……………………………………………………..… ……….... x Tutor-Marked Assignments (TMAs)…............................................................. x Final Examinations and Grading…………………………………………….. x Summary……………….……………………………………….……………. x Introduction Forest and Wildlife Policy, Law and Administration are a broad term comprising of two different disciplines namely; Forestry and Wildlife. Forest Policy could be defined as a plan of actions designed to indicate what proportions of a nation‘s land area should be allocated or allotted. The Forest Administrative Department is the body responsible for implementation of forest policy and forestry issues in any country. Through norms and legislation, financial means, an information and forest programme, forest policy is designed to promote the sustainable management of forest land resources uses. There are different implementations of state forest administration systems in different countries. For instance, in Europe there are different
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Conservation and Community Participation in Kainji Lake National Park, Nigeria
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library Advances in Applied Science Research, 2011, 2 (2): 218-226 ISSN: 0976-8610 CODEN (USA): AASRFC Biodiversity Conservation and Community Participation in Kainji Lake National Park, Nigeria Abimbola O. Adetoro, M.S. Lawal and Adetola Jenyo-Oni Dept of Wildlife & Fisheries Management, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria ______________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT This study examined the participation of communities in the biodiversity conservation of Kanji Lake National Park (KLNP) with a view to improving the relationship between the community and the park. Structured questionnaire were used for the study. Four villages, two each from the two sectors of the park (Borgu and Zugurma) that makes up the human communities in close proximity and with vast population growth were purposively selected for the study. The communities studied were Wawa, Bussa, Ibbi and Kaima. A total of one hundred and thirty-two questionnaires were administered randomly to the respondents. Retrieved data were analysed using descriptive method (pie and bar charts and frequency distribution) and chi-square statistic was used to elicit the relationship between community participation and conversation in KLNP. The result obtained shows that park effort in sustainable conservation is far from being excellent but improving. Challenges facing the park were mostly based on alienation of the communities from active participation. 70.2% of respondents were of the view that community involvement in conservation activity is good for KLNP. The study revealed, that 64.0% of respondent from communities agreed that park-assisted projects were put up for the community solely by park authority without understanding their feelings and needs, this shows that there is a clear distinction between imposed park assisted community development project and community needed projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Nigerian Legal Framework for Effective Prosecution of Maritime Crimes and Proposals for Reform
    1 1 EVALUATION OF NIGERIAN LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE PROSECUTION OF MARITIME CRIMES AND PROPOSALS FOR REFORM. By ODANWU CHIZOBA MARGARET United Nations-Nippon Foundation Fellow 2015-2016 DIVISION FOR OCEAN AFFAIRS AND THE LAW OF THE SEA OFFICE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, THE UNITED NATIONS NEW YORK, 2016 1 2 ABSRACT This thesis is an exploratory work made up of two parts. The first part examines how prosecution can be an effective tool in the fight against maritime crimes in Nigeria. The nature of maritime crimes envisaged in this work is not limited to Piracy and Armed robbery at sea. But a lot of other illicit activities which do not form part of the popular newspaper headings. Chapter one will equally analyze the enabling laws for prosecution of maritime crimes, in Nigeria, its adequacy and suitability, current situations in Nigeria, challenges to prosecution of maritime crimes and then attempt to proffer lasting solutions and a way forward. Part two will look at the alternative means of tackling and curtailing maritime issues as against criminal prosecution in addressing the maritime crimes that would be more cost effective and at the same time feasible. This is aimed at exploring more preventive measures, appraising the nature of crimes, and determining the enabling and driving factors of maritime crimes. 2 3 1 Table of Contents 1.Chapter 1........................... ........................................................................................ 7 1.1 NIGERIA AND MARITIME CRIMES ...............................................................
    [Show full text]