History and Development
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IFC in Ukraine: 1993 – 2006 an Independent Country Impact Review
IFC in Ukraine: 1993 – 2006 An Independent Country Impact Review http://www.ifc.org/ieg 2008 Washington D.C 2008 © International Finance Corporation (IFC) 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20433, USA Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: http://www.ifc.org All rights reserved This volume, except for the “IFC Management Response to IEG-IFC” and “Chairperson’s Summary” is a product of the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) and the findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of IFC Management, the Executive Directors of the World Bank Group, or the govern- ments they represent. This volume does not support any general inferences beyond the scope of the evaluation, in- cluding any inferences about IFC’s past, current, or prospective overall performance. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no re- sponsibility whatsoever for any consequences of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other informa- tion shown on any map in a publication do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank Group concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without per- mission may be a violation of applicable law. The World Bank Group encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; facsimile: 978-750-4470; Internet:http://www.copyright.com. -
BICC Paper9: an Overview of Defense Conversion in Ukraine
by StacyLarsen June1997 StacyLarsen iscurrentlycompletingherMaster'sdegreeinInternationalPolicyStudiesattheMontereyInstituteofInternati onalStudies. SheconductedtheresearchforthispaperwhileinterningatBICC. Copyeditor:RobertMann BICC.ANDERELISABETHKIRCHE255311. 3BONNGERMAN. Y .PHONE+49-228-91196-0.FAX+49-228-241215 [email protected]:http://bicc.uni-bonn.de AN OVERVIEW OF DEFENSE CONVERSION IN UKRAINE CONTENTS I. SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 4 III. AREA ONE: REALLOCATION OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES 6 IV. AREA TWO: REORIENTATION OF MILITARY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)—COOPERATIVE INVESTMENT IN UKRAINE’S SOCIOECONOMIC FUTURE 9 1. Military R&D in Ukraine 9 2. R&D Conversion Programs in Ukraine 9 2.1 Science and Technology Center of Ukraine 9 2.2 Civilian Research and Development Foundation 11 2.3 International Association for the Promotion of Cooperation 12 with Scientists from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union 3. The Role of External Assistance 14 4. Questions for Further Research 15 4.1 The Extent of ‘Brain Drain’ 15 4.2 R&D Conversion in Conventional Weapons Technologies 15 i V. AREA THREE: UKRAINE’S MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX—CONVERSION OR ARMS MARKET DEVELOPMENT? 16 1. The Arms Industry in Ukraine 16 1.1 Conversion Plans and Projects in the Aerospace, Aviation 22 and Shipbuilding Sectors 1.2 Obstacles to Conversion 23 1.3 Pursuing the Arms Market 25 2. The Role of External Assistance 27 3. Questions for Further Research 28 3.1 Successof Independent Conversion Efforts 28 3.2 Role of Private Investment in Defense Industry Restructuring 28 3.3 Consequences of Arms Export Expansion 29 VI. AREA FOUR: DEMOBILIZATION AND REINTEGRATION OF MILITARY PERSONNEL 30 1. Demobilization: Obstacles and Opportunities 30 2. -
Ship-Breaking.Com Information Bulletins on Ship Demolition, # 8 - 11 from January 1, to December 31, 2007
Ship-breaking.com Information bulletins on ship demolition, # 8 - 11 from January 1, to December 31, 2007 Robin des Bois 2008 Press release January, 24th 2008 Global Statement 2007 of Shipping Vessels Sent to Demolition For the 2nd consecutive year, Robin des Bois has been studying in detail the reality of the ship breaking market. The mobilisation and the analysis of about thirty diverse and specialised bibliographical sources made it possible to establish an inventory of the vessels sent to be demolished in 2007. In 2006, Robin des Bois tallied 293 vessels sold for demolition. In 2007, we listed 288 of them. If this decline in demolished vessels is modest (-2%), it is a little more significant with regard to the total weight of recycled metals: 1.7 million ton in 2007 against 1.9 million in 2006 (-10%). The situation differs however according to the category of ships considered: the number of tankers (oil tankers, chemical tankers, gas carriers) dismantled in 2007 increased by almost 30 % compared with 2006 whereas that of the bulk carriers and other general cargo ships decreased by almost 40 %; the average age of the tankers sent to demolition is 29 years, the average age for all the vessels is 31 years, the average age of bulk carriers 34 years. Of the 288 vessels, 95 (33 %) were under a European flag or belonged to ship-owners established in the European Union or members of the European Association of Free Exchange (EFTA) or members of the principalities like Monaco. Not one of the international exchanges linking these European ship-owners to non-European demolition sites were preceded by any asbestos removal. -
Master's Thesis
Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER’S THESIS Study program/ Specialization: Spring semester, 2010 Offshore Technology: Subsea Constructions Open Writer: Nadiya Bukhanevych Bukhanevych (Writer’s signature) Faculty supervisor: Ove Tobias Gudmestad External supervisor(s): − Titel of thesis: Key Configurations for Design and Fabrication of High Speed Offshore Vessels. Credits (ECTS): 30 Key words: Pages: ………………… + enclosure: ………… Stavanger, UiS, 01/03/2010 Date/year Frontpage for master thesis Faculty of Science and Technology Decision made by the Dean October 30th 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Master Thesis would not have been written without my supervisor Prof. Ove Tobias Gudmestad, who was abundantly helpful and offered invaluable assistance, who encouraged and challenged me throughout the successful completion. He never accepted less than my best efforts. Thank YOU very MUCH!!!! I would also like to acknowledge to “Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding”, Mykolayev, Ukraine for given materials and books and especially thanks to Dr. Oleksandr Saulovych Rashkovsky. A very special thanks needs to be given to my sister, Anna Frantzen, and to my family members for their support in every way possible. My sincere thanks also goes to all my friends for “being my friends”. And finally to God, who makes all things possible. Stavanger, UiS 25.02.2010 Nadiya Bukhanevych Table of Contents Abstract Abstract in Russian 1. Fundamental concept of multihulls……………………………………………… 1 History Weight/Geometry stability Advantages/ Disadvantages of multihulls Stability Increasing static stability by adding a keel Increasing static stability by increasing beam Static stability of multihulls Comfort in multihulls Seaworthiness Multihulls in motion Six principal motions (six degrees of freedom) 2. -
Social Report 2013-2014.Pdf
NIBULON has become a successful and well-known company despite all obstacles which Ukraine, like other emerging countries, has faced in 23 years of its independence. Despite a difficult and unstable economic situation in the country, the company has invested more than USD 1.6 billion in order to solve principle tasks to strengthen the Ukrainian economy. We are proud of NIBULON being a shining example of a successful business which is built upon principles of social justice and ecological reasonability. The company’s principles are to use resources in the optimal way, use natural and energy saving technologies, create qualitative and environmentally friendly products and to minimize waste. The goals on which NIBULON’s stable development is based are to develop society and business harmoniously and to preserve cultural heritage and natural resources of our earth for future generations. Today NIBULON is reviving Ukrainian navigation and shipbuilding in order to reduce expenses for transportation and to improve the environmental conditions. NIBULON’s activities promote the improvement of Ukraine’s food potential and make Ukraine an exporter of high-quality agricultural commodities. This is confirmed by the Ukrainian leadership position in the world grain market. We are deeply sure that our country has a priceless potential – rich natural resources and fertile land. Ukrainians are hard-working and talented people. This is the very wealth to be protected and preserved for the sake of a successful future in Ukraine. Oleksiy Vadaturskyy, Founder, Majority Owner, General Director of NIBULON, Hero of Ukraine, Laureate of the Ukrainian State Prize for Architecture 3 NIBULON 4 5 STRATEGIC GOALS NIBULON is a leading Ukrainian investor, agricultural producer and exporter. -
Ship-Breaking.Com 2012 Bulletins of Information and Analysis on Ship Demolition, # 27 to 30 from January 1St to December 31St 2012
Ship-breaking.com 2012 Bulletins of information and analysis on ship demolition, # 27 to 30 From January 1st to December 31st 2012 Robin des Bois 2013 Ship-breaking.com Bulletins of information and analysis on ship demolition 2012 Content # 27 from January 1st to April 15th …..……………………….………………….…. 3 (Demolition on the field (continued); The European Union surrenders; The Senegal project ; Letters to the Editor ; A Tsunami of Scrapping in Asia; The END – Pacific Princess, the Love Boat is not entertaining anymore) # 28 from April 16th to July 15th ……..…………………..……………….……..… 77 (Ocean Producer, a fast ship leaves for the scrap yard ; The Tellier leaves with honor; Matterhorn, from Brest to Bordeaux ; Letters to the Editor ; The scrapping of a Portuguese navy ship ; The India – Bangladesh pendulum The END – Ocean Shearer, end of the cruise for the sheep) # 29 from July 16th to October 14th ....……………………..……………….……… 133 (After theExxon Valdez, the Hebei Spirit ; The damaged ship conundrum; Farewell to container ships ; Lepse ; Letters to the Editor ; No summer break ; The END – the explosion of Prem Divya) # 30 from October 15th to December 31st ….………………..…………….……… 197 (Already broken up, but heading for demolition ; Demolition in America; Falsterborev, a light goes out ; Ships without place of refuge; Demolition on the field (continued) ; Hong Kong Convention; The final 2012 sprint; 2012, a record year; The END – Charlesville, from Belgian Congo to Lithuania) Global Statement 2012 ……………………… …………………..…………….……… 266 Bulletin of information and analysis May 7, 2012 on ship demolition # 27 from January 1 to April 15, 2012 Ship-breaking.com An 83 year old veteran leaves for ship-breaking. The Great Lakes bulker Maumee left for demolition at the Canadian ship-breaking yard at Port Colborne (see p 61). -
World Bank Document
Document of THE WORLD BANK Report No. 22526-UA Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ONA PROPOSED GRANT FROM THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY TRUST FUND Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 5.4 MILLION (US$6.9 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO UKRAINE FOR THE AZOV BLACK SEA CORRIDOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized December 14, 2001 Environmentallyand SociallySustainable Development Sector Unit Ukraine and BelarusCountry Unit Europeand CentralAsia Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 200 1) Currency Unit = Hryvnia (UAH) UAH 1.00 = US$0.18 US$1.00 = UAH 5.43 FISCAL YEAR January 1 -- December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BSAP Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan BSEP Black Sea Environmental Program CAS Country Assistance Strategy COP Conference of the Parties CSCEP Crimea State Committee for EnvironmnentalProtection EA Environmental Assessment EU European Union EMP Environmental Management Plan FSU Former Soviet Union GEF Global Environment Facility GIS Geographic Information System GOE Government-owned Enterprises IDF Institutional Development Fund LAC Local Advisory Committee MENR Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources NGO Nongovernmental Organization PSC Project Steering Committee PAL Programmatic Adjustment Loan PIP Project Implementation Plan PIU Project Implementation Unit PMR Project Management Report RLP Regional Landscape Park SA Special Account SAC Scientific Advisory Committee SOE Statement of Expenditure ULRMC Ukrainian Land and Resource Management Center USAID United States Agency for Intemational Development Vice President: Johannes F. Limn Country Manager/Director: Luca Barbone Sector Manager/Director: Kevin M. Cleaver Task Team Leader/Task Manager: Phillip Brylski UKRAINE AZOV BLACK SEA CORRIDOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION CONTENTS A. Project Development Objective Page 1. -
Viva Xpress Logistics (Uk)
VIVA XPRESS LOGISTICS (UK) Tel : +44 1753 210 700 World Xpress Centre, Galleymead Road Fax : +44 1753 210 709 SL3 0EN Colnbrook, Berkshire E-mail : [email protected] UNITED KINGDOM Web : www.vxlnet.co.uk Selection ZONE FULL REPORT Filter : Sort : Group : Code Zone Description ZIP CODES From To Agent UA UAAOD00 UA-Ukraine AOD - 4 days POLISKE 07000 - 07004 VILCHA 07011 - 07012 RADYNKA 07024 - 07024 RAHIVKA 07033 - 07033 ZELENA POLIANA 07035 - 07035 MAKSYMOVYCHI 07040 - 07040 MLACHIVKA 07041 - 07041 HORODESCHYNA 07053 - 07053 KRASIATYCHI 07053 - 07053 SLAVUTYCH 07100 - 07199 IVANKIV 07200 - 07204 MUSIIKY 07211 - 07211 DYTIATKY 07220 - 07220 STRAKHOLISSIA 07225 - 07225 OLYZARIVKA 07231 - 07231 KROPYVNIA 07234 - 07234 ORANE 07250 - 07250 VYSHGOROD 07300 - 07304 VYSHHOROD 07300 - 07304 RUDNIA DYMERSKA 07312 - 07312 KATIUZHANKA 07313 - 07313 TOLOKUN 07323 - 07323 DYMER 07330 - 07331 KOZAROVYCHI 07332 - 07332 HLIBOVKA 07333 - 07333 LYTVYNIVKA 07334 - 07334 ZHUKYN 07341 - 07341 PIRNOVE 07342 - 07342 TARASIVSCHYNA 07350 - 07350 HAVRYLIVKA 07350 - 07350 RAKIVKA 07351 - 07351 SYNIAK 07351 - 07351 LIUTIZH 07352 - 07352 NYZHCHA DUBECHNIA 07361 - 07361 OSESCHYNA 07363 - 07363 KHOTIANIVKA 07363 - 07363 PEREMOGA 07402 - 07402 SKYBYN 07407 - 07407 DIMYTROVE 07408 - 07408 LITKY 07411 - 07411 ROZHNY 07412 - 07412 PUKHIVKA 07413 - 07413 ZAZYMIA 07415 - 07415 POHREBY 07416 - 07416 KALYTA 07420 - 07422 MOKRETS 07425 - 07425 RUDNIA 07430 - 07430 BOBRYK 07431 - 07431 SHEVCHENKOVE 07434 - 07434 TARASIVKA 07441 - 07441 VELIKAYA DYMERKA 07442 - 07442 VELYKA -
ENGLISH Burngullow Jc Looe Plymouth Alderney South Devon Kingswear Railway St
KEY to ATLAS LINE TYPES Multiple track main line with inter-city services . HSL denotes a purpose-built High Speed Line. Single track main line with inter-city services . Multiple track secondary line . Single track secondary line. Multiple track freight line. Single track freight line. Line out of use (OOU). The above lines are built to the normal gauge for the country concerned. Ireland uses 1600 mm gauge; Spain and Portugal use the Iberian 1668 mm broad gauge. Finland, Russia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova use the Russian 1520 mm broad gauge; (Finland 1524 mm). All other countries use the European 1435 mm standard gauge. Localised variations and gauge change over points are noted on the maps. Multiple track narrow gauge lines. The gauge is stated on the maps. Single track narrow gauge line. Narrow gauge lines out of use (OOU). LINE COLOURS Black = Non-electrified. Red = 25kV a/c electrification. Blue = 15kV a/c electrification. Brown = 3000V d/c electrification. Green = 1500V d/c electrification. Orange = Electrification at less than 1500V d/c. The voltage stated on the maps. Lavender = 750V d/c third-rail electrification. Grey = Proposed lines; electrification system noted beside it where relevant. Pink = Heritage railways. The steam engine symbol denotes steam traction on some trains. The few electrified heritage railways have a note as to their electrification system. All unusual electrification systems are noted on the maps and shown in the nearest suitable colour. UE (in the relevant colour) denotes a line undergoing electrification work. LOCATIONS & SYMBOLS Passenger station - Heritage line station - Proposed station - Border customs station. -
Development of Draft River Basin Management Plan for Dnipro River Basin in Ukraine: Phase 1, Step 1 – Description of the Characteristics of the River Basin
European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+): Results 2 and 3 ENI/2016/372-403 DEVELOPMENT OF DRAFT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR DNIPRO RIVER BASIN IN UKRAINE: PHASE 1, STEP 1 – DESCRIPTION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RIVER BASIN Report February 2019 Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Ms Josiane Mongellaz, Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water (FR) EUWI+ country representative in Ukraine Ms Oksana Konovalenko Responsible international thematic lead expert Mr Philippe Seguin, Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water (FR) Authors Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Mr Yurii Nabyvanets Ms Nataliia Osadcha Mr Vasyl Hrebin Ms Yevheniia Vasylenko Ms Olha Koshkina Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document “Assessment of the needs and identification of priorities in implementation of the River Basin Management Plans in Ukraine”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. -
POLTAVA Regionregion
POLTAVAPOLTAVA regionregion PRESENTSPRESENTS 1 GeneralGeneral informationinformation aboutabout PoltavaPoltava regionregion Area: 28800 km2 Population: 1 479,9 ths. inhabitants Center of the region: Poltava 4,8% of the total area of Ukraine 3,3% of the total population of Ukraine 2 PoltavaPoltava regionregion AdministrativeAdministrative divisiondivision ofof territoryterritory Districts 25 Big towns, which locate in Poltava region 5 Population: Poltava 288,9 ths. inhabitants Kremenchuk 224,8 ths. inhabitants Коmsomolsk 54,8 ths. inhabitants Lubny 47,1 ths. inhabitants Mirgorod 39,3 ths. inhabitants Towns, which locate in Poltava district 10 Urban-type communities 21 Villages 1814 3 PoltavaPoltava regionregion TransportationTransportation infrastructureinfrastructure Route length of: Railways 853 km Automobile roads, 18034 km including earth roads 2268 km Number of bridges 662 - total length of bridges 23,1 km Major highway Е40 Railway goods stations: Poltava, Kremenchuk, Komsomolsk, Grebinka, Lubny, Mirgorod, Romodan Airport: Poltava River port: Kremenchuk Department of economic development of Poltava region state administration 4 PoltavaPoltava regionregion WeightWeight inin UkraineUkraine’’ss economicseconomics 6,3% of agricultural production in Ukraine 5,7% of industrial production (6th place in Ukraine ) Gas condensate 61 % Natural gas 37 % Oil 13 % Iron ore 21 % 5 PoltavaPoltava regionregion ResourcesResources potentialpotential Oil, natural gas, 98 deposits gas condensate (25% of all Ukrainian deposits) Iron ore -
Art Nouveau Ukrainian Architecture in a Global Context
Art Nouveau Ukrainian Architecture in a Global Context Nelia Romaniuk Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, Department of History Abstract The article is dedicated to Ukrainian Art Nouveau architecture, which became a unique phenomenon in the development of late nineteenth and early twentieth-century architecture. Along with the reality that architecture in Ukraine evolved as a component of the European artistic movement, a distinctive architectural style was formed, based on the development of the traditions of folk architecture and ornamentation. This style produced much innovation in the shaping, decor, and ornamentation of buildings. Significant contributions to the development of architectural modernism in Ukraine were made by Opanas Slastion, Vasyl Krychevskyi, Yevhen Serdiuk, Oleksandr Verbytskyi, Serhii Tymoshenko, Oleksandr Lushpynskyi, Ivan Levynskyi, Dmytro Diachenko, and others. Ukrainian Art Nouveau architecture was represented by five main architectural styles: modernist, folkloric, rationalist, neo-baroque, and Vienna Secession. Due to an attainment of the possibilities embodied in the constructions, developed techniques, and in the design of interior space and external features — such as walls, roofs, doors and windows, columns and balustrades — this style formed its own expressive system, which included a significant number of socially significant types of buildings (dwellings, schools, hospitals, warehouses, government buildings, places of worship). The styles of Ukrainian architectural modernism have not exhausted their potential and may yet have a continuation in contemporary architecture and that of the future. Key Words: architecture, Ukrainian Art Nouveau, rationalism, secession, construction. 3 Introduction In conditions of the integrative processes of world development and globalization, the need to research historical experiences in all spheres of life of the Ukrainian people intensifies.