DOCSLIB.ORG

Abbott, Don 40, 58 Adams, John 112 Adams, John Quincy 42 Addison

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abbott, Don 40, 58 Adams, John 112 Adams, John Quincy 42 Addison antifoundationalism 149 antilogic 48 antithesis 14–15 Antonia 37 Aphthonius 57 Applebee, Arthur 43, 103 Arab rhetoric 33 argument, types of 68 Index argumentation 61–62, 126–27, 140–41, 151, 167, 185 argumentative strategies 134 A arguments 168; analytic 168; find- Abbott, Don 40, 58 ing 52; thesis/hypothesis 31 Adams, John 112 Aristotelianism 21, 25, 58, 60, 87, Adams, John Quincy 42 114–15, 126, 132, 184, 188, 193 Addison, Joanne 142 Aristotle ix–x, 6–8, 11, 13, 15–16, Aeschylus 195 19–22, 25–26, 33, 50–51, agency 3, 9–10, 84, 96, 102–6, 69, 80–81, 88, 98, 125, 139, 108, 111, 114–16, 149, 157, 151–52, 155–56, 162, 166–67, 161, 165, 197 172, 176, 179, 181, 195–96; Agnew, Lois 34 epistemology of 21–22; on al–Farabi 33 invention 19–22; on knowledge, aleatory procedures 122, 149, 196 three kinds of 50 aletheia 92 Arnheim, Rudolf 141 algorithms 122, 149 art, and pedagogy 45, 54–55; Allen, J. W. 182 characteristics of 49–50; as Alloway, E. 146 defined by Quintilian 53–54; Althusser, Louis 161 defined 149; pedagogies 121 Altieri, Charles 192 Ashton–Jones, Evelyn 113 Amalasuntha of Italy 36 Askew, Anne 37 ambiguities 34 Aspasia 22 Ambrose 56 association of ideas, doctrine of 39 amplification 12, 24, 32, 43, 168 Astell, Mary 35, 37, 59 anagrammatic writing 116, 196 Atwill, Janet xvii, 15, 46, 49–50, analogy, use of 23, 31, 39, 59–60, 117, 144, 164, 195–96 79, 124, 166–67 audience 5, 8, 16–17, 21, 29, 36, Anaximenes 126 42, 48, 61, 64, 69, 73, 75, 82, Andersen, Wallis May 140 85–86, 88, 90, 96, 98, 100–101, Anderson, Bonnie 36 105, 108, 111, 125–31, 136, Anderson, Floyd 90, 181 140, 142, 149–53, 155–58, Anger, Jane 37 167–68, 176–78, 183, 187–88, Anonymous of Bologna 32 194 Antczak, Frederick 112 St. Augustine 9, 30–31, 56, 91 241 242 Index Averroës 33–34 Bizzell, Patricia 100, 110 Avicenna 33 Black, Edwin 81, 97, 154 Axelrod, Rise B. 124, 129, 131 Blair, Carole 109 Blair, Hugh 12, 38–39, 42, 59, B 176, 185 Backes, J. 20 Blair, Kristine 142 backing 149 Blakesley, David xvii, 132 Bacon, Francis 12, 30, 36, 38, 41, Blitz, Michael 144 44, 98, 181 Blum, Ruth Von 140 Bailey, Dudley 74 Boethius 25, 31–32, 57; De topicis Barilli, Renato 26 differentius 32 Barnes, Jonathan 54 Boleyn, Anne 37 Barthes, Roland 159 Bolter, Jay 139 Barton, B. F. 141 Booth, Wayne 74, 77, 127, 164, Barton, M. S. 141 170–71, 188; Modern Dogma Baudrillard, Jean 158–59 and the Rhetoric of Assent 77, 170 Bawarshi, Anis 118, 197 Bordelon, Suzanne 44, 62 Bazerman, Charles ix, xv, xvii, 97, Boylston Chair at Harvard 42, 44 139, 154, 182, 197 brainstorming 136–37, 140 Bechtel, Judith 147 BRAINSTORMS (software) 140 Becker, Alton 1, 9, 75, 80, 83, 93, Brereton, John 74 128, 161–64, 169, 172 Bridwell–Bowles, Lillian 112–13, Beecher, Catherine 44 142 Beers, Terry 95 Britton, James 86, 130, 137 Belanoff, Pat 130 Brockriede, Wayne 77, 81, 173 Bell, Daniel 182 Brodkey, Linda 144 Benoit, William 86 Brody, Miriam 113 Benson, Thomas 32 Brown, James 72 Bereiter, Carl 85, 103, 146 Brown, Joseph S. 130 Berlin, James xvii, 38, 42, 60–61, Bruffee, Kenneth 100 64, 72, 105, 110, 143–44, 164, Brummett, Barry 77, 89, 109–10 176–77, 189 Brunelle, Eugene 71 Bernard–Donals, Michael 106 Bruner, Jerome 71, 75 Bernhardt, Stephen 141 Bryant, Donald 18, 68 Berthoff, Ann 81–84, 86, 130, Buck, Gertrude 43, 62, 64 133, 170 Bullock, Richard 144 Bevilacqua, Vincent 39 Burger, Ronna 19 Bhaskar, Roy 106 Burhan, Clinton 124 Bible, The 31–32 Burke, Kenneth 9, 66, 75, 81, Biesecker, Barbara 113 84, 87, 91, 122, 131, 151, 157, Bilsky, Manuel 73 162, 175; Burkean theory 150; binary opposites 110, 143, 150 definition of rhetoric 66; “Five Bitzer, Lloyd 21, 39, 75 Index 243 Master Terms” 66, 165;. See circumference 9, 66, 87, 150, 176; also Pentad, dramatism as situational context 9 Burke, Rebecca 62 civic discourse xii, 111 Burke, Virginia 74 civic virtue 47 Burney, Fanny 43 Clark, Gregory 44 Burns, Hugh 139, 179 classical rhetoric xv, 1, 29, 34, 61, Byard, Vicki 122 75, 80, 83–84, 88, 114, 117, Byzantine rhetoric 30 125, 148, 165–66, 173, 175, 179, 184, 193 C Clifford, John 105, 111 Camargo, Martin 32 Clinton, Elizabeth 37 Campbell, George 38–39, 44, 60, cognitive apprenticeship 191 176, 185 cognitive rhetoric 84, 101–5 Campbell, John Angus 98, 186 Cohen, Michael 140 Campbell, Jo Anne 44 Colburn, Jean 130 Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs 44 Cole, Michael 72 Carlton, Robert 77 Cole, Thomas 48 Carter, Michael 14, 94, 117, 197 collaborative planning 102, 113, Cartesianism 40, 66, 106, 161. 119, 136, 142, 150, 191 See also Descartes Collins, Paul 112 Cary, Mary Ann Shadd 44 commensurability 107, 192 Cassiodorus 31, 32 commonplaces 24, 31, 72, 106, Catherine of Aragon 37 127, 150 Caywood, Cynthia 142 common sense 38–40, 60, 85, 93, Cereta, Laura 37 135 Channing, Edward 42 common topics 7, 19–22, 24, 32, chaos, uses of 82, 86, 89, 133 34, 80, 124–27, 150, 162, 196. See also Charney, Davida 125 topoi Cherry, Roger 125, 147 composition, as problem–solv- Cherwitz, Richard 77, 91, 109, ing 21; pedagogy 1, 71, 131, 164, 178 154–57, 169 Chil, Lydia Maria 44 Comprone, Joseph 87, 131 Child, Francis 42 concept formation 133 Christensen, Frances 93 condensation 83 Christianity 29–30, 37, 56–57, 62 Condillac 40 Chrysostom, John 30, 56 congruence 107, 192 Church, D. 24 Conley, Thomas 20 Cicero x, 4, 21, 24–28, 32, 51–55, Connelly, Francis 124 127, 180, 184; Antonius 24, 26, Connors, Robert 48, 62, 125, 52, 53; Crassus 24–26, 52–53; 131, 179 De Inventione 25, 27; De Oratore Consigny, Scott 75 4, 25–26, 51–55; epistemology consubstantiality 67 of 25–26; litigation strategies 25 controversia 26 244 Index Cooper, Anna 44 D’Angelo, Frank 57, 82, 94, 125 Cooper, Charles R. 86, 124, 129, Daedalus Group 139 131 DAEDALUS INVENT (software) Cooper, Martha 112 140 Cope, E. M. 20, 50–51 Darwin, Charles 97–98, 186–87 Copernicus 193 Daumer, Elizabeth 112–13 Corax 48 Davidson, Margaret 43 Corbett, Edward P. J. xvii, 74–75, Day, Henry 43 79–83, 124–25, 164–66; Clas- Dean, Harold H. 73 sical Rhetoric for the Modern deception 16 Student 79, 124, 165 deconstruction xii–xiii, 104, 142, Cornelia 28 150 counterpedagogy 144 deductive reasoning 8, 19, 25, 31, Couture, Barbara 106, 192 39, 60, 72, 97, 147; and hypo- Covino, William 18, 25–26 thetico–deductive process 97 Craig, William 112 Deems, Julie 117 CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLV- definition 7, 19, 23–24, 27, ER (software) 139 32, 34–35, 46, 57–58, 73–74, creativity 71–72, 86, 93, 104, 79, 91, 98, 124–25, 132, 143, 112, 118, 147, 177, 198–99 161–62, 189, 196 Crick, Francis 97, 99 Deleuze, Gilles 106, 117, 161 Crismore, Avon 97 deliberative rhetoric 7, 20, 23, 27, critical–creative binary 40 31, 34, 52, 56, 151, 162, 166, critical inquiry 77, 145, 173 188 Critical Rhetoricians 107 delivery 11 critical thinking 21, 44, 62, 71, demonstrative knowledge 47 130, 143 Derrida, Jacques 18, 99, 150, 155, Croce, Benedetto 38 192 Crosby, Sarah 43 Descartes, Rene 38. See also Car- Crowley, Sharon 43, 63, 72, 104, tesianism 125, 142, 164 Detienne, Marcel 47 Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly 104 Dewey, John 99, 158 cultural codes 10, 105, 116, 119, de Lauretis, Theresa 113 143, 150 Dhuoda of Uzes 36 cultural criticism xii, 110, 139 dialectic 11, 18–19, 25–28, 32– cultural studies 10, 96, 110, 115, 33, 35, 38, 49, 62, 88, 108, 122, 117, 143–44, 148, 157, 189–90 131, 134, 151, 165, 175, 181 Cummins, Maria 44 dialoguing 113, 142 current–traditional rhetoric 42, dianoetic 151 60, 63, 150, 176, 184–86; peda- Dick, Robert 75 gogy of 63–64 Dieter, Otto 20 Cyprian 56 Dillon, Ronna F. 103 Diotima 22 D Index 245 discourse communities 3, 5, 96, Einhorn, Lois 41 100–101, 116, 151 Elbow, Peter 129–30, 171 discursive communities 104 Elements of Rhetoric (Whately) 41, displacement 83 60–61 dissensus 106, 156 Ellen, Frances 44 dissociative schemes 167 Ellul, Jacques 182 dissoi logoi 7, 13, 16, 22, 77, 151, elocutio 11, 55 160 eloquence 21, 25, 29, 34, 40, 48, Dissoi Logoi (Anonymous) 13 52, 54–55, 57, 59 dissoi paralogoi 144 Emerson, Ralph Waldo 42 dissonance 13, 17, 80, 104, 129, Emig, Janet xvii, 44, 81, 113, 130 135, 144, 151, 161, 179 Emmel, Barbara 126 DiStefano, Philip 146 emotion 39, 44, 48, 100, 124, 156 division 23, 32, 49, 118, 132, 198 emotional appeals 32, 80, 124, dogma 170 156, 167 Donawerth, Jane 22, 35–36, 43, Empedocles 14–15, 48 59, 61 empiricism 39, 160, 165 double–entry notebook 119, encomia 152 133–34, 148 English Studies 1, 65, 74–75, 78, doxa 108, 145 81, 170 dramatism 9, 66, 81, 87, 122, Enos, Richard Leo xvii, 15, 18, 131–32, 151, 157, 165, 176. 20, 25, 47, 56, 86 defined 151. See also Burke, Enos, Theresa 40 Kenneth enthymeme 8, 19, 21–24, 27–28, Driére, Craig La 73 31–34, 55, 87–88, 126, 128, duBOIS, Page 19 152; and invention 111–12 Duhamel, Albert 59, 68, 73 ephebia 29, 56 Dunbar, Alice 44 epicheireme 24, 27–28, 55, 152 Dunne, J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This malarial was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropoetics V, 1
    Anthropoetics V, 1 Anthropoetics V, no. 1 Spring / Summer 1999 ISSN 1083-7264 Table of Contents 1. Erik Eisel - "In the Beginning was the Word...": The Question of the Origin of Language in Goethe's Faust 2. William Mishler - The Question of the Origin of Language in René Girard, Eric Gans, and Kenneth Burke 3. Herbert Plutschow - An Anthropological Perspective on the Japanese Tea Ceremony 4. Eric Gans - The Little Bang: The Early Origin of Language 5. Benchmarks Eric Gans / [email protected] Last updated 7/23/99 http://steadr/anthropoetics/0501/ [5/10/2000 10:29:48 AM] Eisel Anthropoetics 5, no. 1 (Spring/Summer 1999) "In the Beginning was the Word...": The Question of the Origin of Language in Goethe's Faust Erik M. Eisel Department of Germanic Languages University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles CA 90095-1539 [email protected] Beginning with the Age of Goethe, the history of the question of the origin of language follows from the general questions, "What is man?" "What is culture?" and "What is language?"(1) The Berlin Academy of Sciences conjectured in its Preisfrage of 1769 whether human beings, "abandoned to their natural faculties," are capable of inventing language. In response, the first sentence of Johann Gottfried Herder's winning "Essay on the Origin of Language" gives the starting point for new anthropological thinking in the eighteenth century, changing the history of this question: "Already as an animal the human being has language."(2) As Helmut Mueller-Sievers, the author of Self-Generation: Biology, Philosophy, and Literature Around 1800, points out, Herder's rhetorical procedure is an attempt to deny both empirical and divine origins of language while unifying his philosophical project within the domain of language: The quest for a satisfactory explanation for the origin and status of language at the end of the eighteenth century is, historically and structurally, related to the debate about the origin of living beings.
    [Show full text]
  • TOTE Criticism: Speech Communication: Unions
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 199 609 CS 205 688 TITLE Rhetoric and Public Address: Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations Pliblished in "Dissertation Abstracts International," January through June 1980 (Vol. (10 Nos. 7 through 12). INSTITUTION ERIC Clearinghouse.on Reading and Communication Skills, Urbana, Ill. 0_ PUB DATE 80 TOTE 13p.: Pages may be marginally legible. EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage). DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies,: Churches; *Communication Research: Connected Discourse; Content Analysis; *Discourse Analysis: *Doctoral Dissertations: Organizational Communication: *Persuasive Discourse: Political Science; Politics; *Public Speaking: Religibus Organizations: *Rhetoric; *Rhetorical Criticism: Speech Communication: Unions; Womens Studies ABSTRACT This collection of abstracts is-part of a continuing . 'series'providing information on recent doctorgl dissertations.The'20 titles deal with-A variety oftopics, including the following: (1) the campaign communication during the Carter-Pordtelevision debates: (2) apprehensiveness and performance inpublic speaking; (3)a history and criticism 9f-the Vietnam antivar;movement:((4). a case study of institutional rhetoric and radical :Change (thecontemporary Roman Catholic Church in America):(5) synthesizing methodologies' used,:in the study of political communication during the 1976United States presidential election campaign:(6) the audience effects of (7) rhetorical vision and black social reality: 4 apoliogetic discourse: (8),a case study of organizational apologia. (theAmerican Federation of Labor, 1945-1956): and rhetorical analysesof the speeches/discourses of (9) Dorothy bay for the Catholic Worker movement, (10) British Conservative Party leader MargaretThatcher., (11) Charles Betts Galloway,(12) Carl Schurz,(13) Cleveland mayoral Candidate Arnold Pinkney,(14) Richard Nixon on Vietnam, (15) United States Senator Wayne Morse on Vietnam, (16) Supreme Court Justice Wilgam 0. Douglas on the First Amendment, (17)'U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Key Terms of Dramatism
    INTRODUCTION: THE FIVE KEY TERMS OF DRAMATISM WHAT is involved, when we say what people are doing and why they are doing it? An answer to that question is the subject of this book. The book is concerned with the basic forms of thought which, in ac- cordance with the nature of the world as all men necessarily experience it, are exemplified in the attributing of motives. These forms of thought can be embodied profoundly or trivially, truthfully or falsely. They are equally present in systematically elaborated metaphysical structures, in legal judgments, in poetry and fiction, in political and scientific works, in news and in bits of gossip offered at random. We shall use five terms as generating principle of our investigation. They are: Act, Scene, Agent, Agency, Purpose. In a rounded state- ment about motives, you must have some word that names the act (names what took place, in thought or deed), and another that names the scene (the background of the act, the situation in which it oc- curred) ; also, you must indicate what person or kind of person {agent) performed the act, what means or instruments he used {agency), and the purpose. Men may violently disagree about the purposes behind a given act, or about the character of the person who did it, or how he did it, or in what kind of situation he acted; or they may even insist upon totally different words to name the act itself. But be that as it may, any complete statement about motives will offer some kind of an- swers to these five questions: what was done (act), when or where it was done (scene), who did it (agent), how he did it (agency), and why (purpose).
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Arthur Alvin Vanderveen, Jr. 2002
    Copyright by Arthur Alvin VanderVeen, Jr. 2002 The Dissertation Committee for Arthur Alvin VanderVeen, Jr. certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Other Minds, Other Worlds: Pragmatism, Hermeneutics, and Constructive Modernism, 1890-1942 Committee: _________________________________ Warwick Wadlington, Co-Supervisor _________________________________ Phillip Barrish, Co-Supervisor _________________________________ Katherine Arens _________________________________ Evan Carton _________________________________ Brian Bremen Other Minds, Other Worlds: Pragmatism, Hermeneutics, and Constructive Modernism, 1890-1942 by Arthur Alvin VanderVeen Jr., B.A., M.Div., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2002 “The more we see, the more we think; while the more we think, the more we see in our immediate experience, and the greater grows the detail, and the more significant the articulateness of our perception.” William James Acknowledgments For their support, I would like to acknowledge the University of Texas at Austin Graduate School for a University Fellowship, the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation for an Ernest Hemingway Research Grant, and the Mellon Foundation for a Summer Seminar Grant. I cannot claim that this support speeded the completion of this project, but it did allow me to pursue my research interests more broadly and deeply than I would otherwise have been able. I extend my sincerest thanks to Warwick Wadlington, whose appreciation for the particularity and fullness of the world has taught me to avoid simple binaries and remain open to the disturbing details that lead to new insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Occult Invention: the Rebirth of Rhetorical Heuresis
    OCCULT INVENTION: THE REBIRTH OF RHETORICAL HEURESIS IN EARLY MODERN BRITISH LITERATURE FROM CHAPMAN TO SWIFT by MICHAEL CHARLES MCCANN A DISSERTATION Presented to the Comparative Literature Program and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2011 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Michael Charles McCann Title: Occult Invention: The Rebirth of Rhetorical Heuresis in Early Modern British Literature from Chapman to Swift This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Comparative Literature Program by: Dianne Dugaw Co-Chairperson John T. Gage Co-Chairperson Kenneth Calhoon Member Steven Shankman Member Jeffrey Librett Outside Member and Kimberly Andrews Espy Vice President for Research and Innovation/Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2011. ii © 2011 Michael Charles McCann iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Michael C. McCann Doctor of Philosophy Comparative Literature Program September 2011 Title: Occult Invention: The Rebirth of Rhetorical Heuresis in Early Modern British Literature from Chapman to Swift Approved: _______________________________________________ Dianne Dugaw Approved: _______________________________________________ John T. Gage The twentieth-century project of American rhetorician Kenneth Burke, grounded in a magic-based theory of language, reveals a path to the origins of what I am going to call occult invention. The occult, which I define as a symbol set of natural terms derived from supernatural terms, employs a method of heuresis based on a metaphor-like process I call analogic extension.
    [Show full text]
  • REVELATORY VERNACULAR RHETORIC on the INTERNET By
    PASSAGES DIVINELY LIT: REVELATORY VERNACULAR RHETORIC ON THE INTERNET By ROBERT GLENN HOWARD A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of English and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2001 ii "Passages Divinely Lit: Revelatory Vernacular Rhetoric on the Internet," a dissertation prepared by Robert Glenn Howard in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of English. This dissertation has been approved and accepted by: Dr. Daniel Wojcik, Chair of the Examining Committee Date Committee in charge: Dr. Daniel Wojcik, Chair Dr. James Crosswhite Dr. David Frank Dr. John Gage Dr. Sharon Sherman Accepted by: Dean of the Graduate School iii © 2001 Robert Glenn Howard iv An Abstract of the Dissertation of Robert Glenn Howard for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English to be taken August 2001 Title: PASSAGES DIVINELY LIT: REVELATORY VERNACULAR RHETORIC ON THE INTERNET Approved: Dr. Daniel Wojcik Since the advent of the public World-Wide-Web in 1992, networked computer communication has rapidly become integral to the daily lives of many North Americans. Many researchers in the humanities and social sciences debate the potential power and nature of the effects of these new forms of communication. Some scholars see dangers in the changing forms of "media literacy," but others see the Internet engendering new levels of democratic debate at grassroots and personal levels. However, much of this research still lacks the basic methodological rigor necessary to make reasonable claims about actual individual human communicative behavior on the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Magic Spell: Radical Theories of Folk and Fairy Tales
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Folklore Anthropology 7-5-2002 Breaking the Magic Spell: Radical Theories of Folk and Fairy Tales Jack Zipes Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Zipes, Jack, "Breaking the Magic Spell: Radical Theories of Folk and Fairy Tales" (2002). Folklore. 15. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_folklore/15 Breaking the Magic Spell Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright O 1979 by Jack Zipes Published 2002 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. - Editorial and Sales Ofices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Zipes, Jack Breaking the magic spell. 1. Tales, European-History and criticism. 2. Literature and society. I. Title ISBN-10: 0-8131-9030-4 (paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-8131-9030-3 This book is printed on acid-free recycled paper meeting the requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence in Paper for Printed Library Materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentadic Ratios in Burke's Theory of Dramatism Dramatism Kenneth Burke
    Ross 1 Pentadic Ratios in Burke’s Theory of Dramatism Dramatism Kenneth Burke (1945) introduced his theory of “dramatism” in his book A Grammar of Motives, saying,“[I]t invites one to consider the matter of motives in a perspective that, being developed from the analysis of drama, treats language and thought primarily as modes of action” (p. xxii). Burke (1978) later explains that the term “dramatism” stems from the idea that language is viewed “primarily as a mode of action rather than as a mode of knowledge, though the two emphases are by no means mutually exclusive” (p. 330). His belief that humans are symbol-users and that symbolic action is both public and unavoidable (Burke, 1978; Kneupper, 1979) led to the creation of dramatism. Dramatistic theory takes into account the nature of language and symbolism. The theory expands on ideas of “identification,” guilt, tropes and figures, and Burke’s “pentad” of terms for analysis, in addition to much more throughout his work. Burke’s theories emerged as a fusion of Freudian psychology and Marxist ideologies (Smith, 2009). Dramatism acts as a method and meta-method, in that the questions raised by a dramatistic inquiry question both the action and analyze the effect of the explanation of action (Overington, 1977). Dramatism, therefore, is a “logic of inquiry” for examining rhetoric, with a fundamental emphasis on motive: “the language of motives, motives in language, language as motive” (Overington, 1977, p. 133). The various aspects of dramatism offer ways to view the world generally and analyze public discourse and action specifically.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Do Things with Fish and Macintyre: Speech Act Theory
    How To Do Things With Fish and MacIntyre: Speech Act Theory, Dramatic Narrative, And The Interpretation Of Moral Utterance By Jason Hannan, B. Sc. A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts School of Journalism and Communication Carleton University Ottawa, ON August 29, 2005 © 2005, Jason Hannan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 0-494-10048-6 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 0-494-10048-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce,Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve,sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet,distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform,et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Zachary Daniel Sharp 2020
    Copyright by Zachary Daniel Sharp 2020 The Dissertation Committee for Zachary Daniel Sharp Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Dissertation: Rhetoric, Poetics, and the Devotional Lyric in Early Modern England Committee: Davida H. Charney, Supervisor Wayne A. Rebhorn, Co-Supervisor Lawrence D. Green Mark G. Longaker Jeffrey Walker Rhetoric, Poetics, and the Devotional Lyric in Early Modern England by Zachary Daniel Sharp Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2020 Dedication For my parents Acknowledgements In the course of planning and writing this dissertation I have incurred many debts. I thank Frank Whigham for starting me on the path and Wayne Rebhorn for his help along the way. I am also grateful for the privilege of having taken Jeffrey Walker’s course on classical rhetoric (twice) as well as for his encouragement when this project was still in its nascent stages. If it is not immediately obvious, my greatest scholarly debt is to him. I want to thank my friends and colleagues at The University of Texas at Austin, in particular James Garner and Xinyao Xiao, for suggesting improvements to early drafts of these chapters. I have also benefited substantially from the support of the English and Rhetoric departments. I owe much to my teachers and mentors at Trinity University, San Antonio, where I did my undergraduate work: I wish to acknowledge Michael Schreyach, Jeffrey Rufo, and my first teacher of rhetoric, Willis Salomon.
    [Show full text]
  • Disease As Drama: Dramatistic Constructs and Modes Of
    DISEASE AS DRAMA: DRAMATISTIC CONSTRUCTS AND MODES OF REDEMPTION IN COVERING ILLNESS IN GLAMOUR MAGAZINE A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by EKATERINA PESHEVA Margaret Duffy, Ph.D., Thesis Supervisor DECEMBER, 2005 To my mom Acknowledgements I want to thank the following people for their support: Margaret Duffy, PhD Ivan Vassilev Becky Woelfel i i Table of Contents: Chapter I: I-A. Kenneth Burke’s Dramatism……………………………………1-6 I-B. Burke: Modes of Application in Previous Research…………….6-10 I-C. How Disease and Health Have Been Studied to Date…………..10-26 I-D. Dramatistic Analysis of Disease…………………………………26-28 Chapter II: II-A. Research Question………………………………………………29 II-B. So What? (Medium and Sample)................................................29-33 Chapter III: III-A. Why Dramatism?.........................................................................34 III-B. Elements of Dramatism…………………………………………35-41 III-C. Methodological Recipe for Current Study……………………....42 Chapter IV: IV-A. Detailed Analyses……………………………………………….43-99 Chapter V: V-A. Discussion and Implications…………………………………….100-109 Chapter VI: VI-A. Recommendations for Further Research……………………….110-111 VI-B. Limitations………………………………………………………111-112 VI-C. Bibliography……………………………………………………..112-120 VI-D. Vita……………………………………………………………….121 ii i Chapter I I-A. Kenneth Burke’s Dramatism English writer Walter Pater once observed that theatre is “mass with secular vestments.” (King, 2001, p. 35) Kenneth Burke, the godfather of dramatism, would have argued that most forms of human rhetoric are mass in secular vestments. But just how is rhetoric related to religion? Burke says that most, if not all, forms of human communication can be traced back to basic religious metaphors.
    [Show full text]