Copyright by Zachary Daniel Sharp 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Copyright by Zachary Daniel Sharp 2020 The Dissertation Committee for Zachary Daniel Sharp Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Dissertation: Rhetoric, Poetics, and the Devotional Lyric in Early Modern England Committee: Davida H. Charney, Supervisor Wayne A. Rebhorn, Co-Supervisor Lawrence D. Green Mark G. Longaker Jeffrey Walker Rhetoric, Poetics, and the Devotional Lyric in Early Modern England by Zachary Daniel Sharp Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2020 Dedication For my parents Acknowledgements In the course of planning and writing this dissertation I have incurred many debts. I thank Frank Whigham for starting me on the path and Wayne Rebhorn for his help along the way. I am also grateful for the privilege of having taken Jeffrey Walker’s course on classical rhetoric (twice) as well as for his encouragement when this project was still in its nascent stages. If it is not immediately obvious, my greatest scholarly debt is to him. I want to thank my friends and colleagues at The University of Texas at Austin, in particular James Garner and Xinyao Xiao, for suggesting improvements to early drafts of these chapters. I have also benefited substantially from the support of the English and Rhetoric departments. I owe much to my teachers and mentors at Trinity University, San Antonio, where I did my undergraduate work: I wish to acknowledge Michael Schreyach, Jeffrey Rufo, and my first teacher of rhetoric, Willis Salomon. Lastly, for her patience, enthusiasm, and dedication, I thank Davida Charney, who, as John Donne would say, taught me to “speake truths, and credibly.” v Abstract Rhetoric, Poetics, and the Devotional Lyric in Early Modern England Zachary Daniel Sharp, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2020 Supervisor: Davida H. Charney Co-Supervisor: Wayne A. Rebhorn Recently, scholars have argued that poetry provided the foundations for the development of rhetoric in antiquity. Lyric poetry in particular functioned as epideictic performance, a public, generalized art able to encompass a range of rhetorical motives. I propose that poetry played a similar role in early modern England, especially in the development of the devotional lyric. This contrasts with the prevailing view, that poetry served a primarily didactic role in the humanistic classroom and, more broadly, acted as a propaedeutic to ethical and philosophical instruction. I argue that these different uses of poetry represent two coevolving traditions centered on two competing ideas about the goal of poetry: “performative” poetics sees poetry as a situationally-defined, rhetorical art of invention; “paideutic” poetics sees poetry as a hermeneutic art that trains ethical and philosophical judgment. I examine how these traditions manifest themselves in Renaissance poetics, particularly in George Puttenham’s Art of English Poesy and in William Scott’s Model of Poesy. The former imagines poetry to be a performative, courtly vi art, where rhetoric and poetry are fundamentally alike; the latter sees poetry as a theoretical art of moral instruction defined by an Aristotelian criterion of mimesis. I argue that these traditions also influence the religious lyrics of George Herbert and John Donne. Herbert and Donne, I suggest, innovate within these two very different paradigms: Herbert treats his lyrics as public, liturgical performances, while Donne sees his as “literary critical” artifacts meant to exercise practical judgment and train aristocratic taste. vii Table of Contents Chapter One: The Epideictic Genres of Lyric: Performative and Paideutic Poetics .......... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 Ancient Theories of Artistic Discourse ..................................................................11 Grammarians and Critics .......................................................................................19 The Lyric as Ritual Discourse ...............................................................................31 Lyric Genres and Epideictic Performativity ...........................................................45 Overview of This Dissertation ...............................................................................51 Chapter Two: “Fitter to Please the Court Than the School”: Performative and Paideutic Rhetoric in Elizabethan Poetics .................................................................56 Introduction ..........................................................................................................56 Thomas Elyot on Rhetoricians and Versifiers ........................................................62 Sidney’s Defence of Poetry ...................................................................................67 Paideutic Poetics: Scott’s Model of Poesy .............................................................71 Performative Poetics: Puttenham’s Art of English Poesy .......................................77 Conclusion ............................................................................................................86 Chapter Three: “Devotion, Not Controversie”: George Herbert’s Temple and Lyric Performativity ..........................................................................................................91 Introduction ..........................................................................................................91 The Temple as Liturgy ......................................................................................... 101 Performativity in The Country Parson ................................................................. 111 Epideictic Performativity in The Temple ............................................................. 119 “Church-Musick”: The Temple and Public Devotion after the Restoration ........... 133 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 137 viii Chapter Four: John Donne Is Not a Sophist: Paideutic Poetics and Useful Obscurity in the Holy Sonnets ................................................................................................ 141 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 141 “That Mystical Writing of Verse”: Donne and Mysterious Discourse .................. 148 Analytical Rhetoric in the Holy Sonnets .............................................................. 159 Psalmic Interpretation, Coterie Exchange, and Literary Judgment ....................... 168 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 179 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 182 Bibliography ................................................................................................................ 187 ix Chapter One: The Epideictic Genres of Lyric: Performative and Paideutic Poetics INTRODUCTION Roland Greene offers a timely and valuable insight about Renaissance poetics when he observes that “the disparity between the available terms of lyric theory and the actual productions of the genre” in the Renaissance “become arrestingly evident.”1 The Renaissance lyric, according to Greene, is difficult to categorize because in it we find the beginnings of the “modern idea of lyric productions as short, intense, and exquisite redactions of impassioned speech,” an idea of lyric that is only first developed critically in the Romantic period. Renaissance lyric theory, then, becomes a kind of contradiction in terms. As Greene puts it, “where it is assumed that speech can be idealized into poetry and poetry naturalized into speech, a poetics of lyric like those of epic and drama can seem beside the point.” Furthermore, since lyric is a multiform genre—comprised of odes, hymns, and many other generic types—it seems to lack the cohesiveness of other major poetic categories, leading to its theoretical neglect.2 Greene also points out that the lyric’s close proximity to rhetoric results in difficulties categorizing it poetically. This is a crucial observation, as is Greene’s point that there were certain aspects of Renaissance poetics—a focus on narrative and other mimetic genres of poetry—that led to theorists giving lyric comparatively little attention. But Greene falls back on a relatively common, and, I want to claim, mistaken critical tendency. 1 Roland Greene, “The Lyric,” in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Vol. 3: The Renaissance, ed. Glyn P. Norton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 216. 2 Greene, 216. 1 Like many modern critics, he sees the history of poetics as a steady and welcome progression away from rhetoric and toward a greater degree of poetic autonomy. The Renaissance “conflation” of poetry with rhetoric is thus seen to have delayed a fully realized theory of the lyric. For Greene, it is the “lyric subjectivity” of the Renaissance sonnet sequence that comes closest to something more appropriately poetic: the lyric sequence becomes “an occasion for reflection on subjecthood,” and, more importantly, it evokes the “plurivocal,” discursive world of narrative and drama. The sonnet sequence, now better able to conform to mimetic poetic criteria,