DOCSLIB.ORG

Xerox University Microfilms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Xerox University Microfilms INFORMATION TO USERS This malarial was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. Xerox University Microfilms 300 North ZMb Road Ann Aitwr, Michigan 40106 74-3141 CRABLE, Richard Ellsworth, 1947- | RHETORIC AS ARCHITECTONIC: BURKE, \ PERELMAN, AND TOUIMNON VALUING I AND KNOWING. I The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1973. 1 Speech University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan (^) Copyright by Richard Ellsworth Crable 1973 THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED. RHETORIC AS ARCHITECTONIC: BURKE, FERELMAN, AND TOULWIN ON VALUING AND KNOWING DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Richard Ellsworth Crable, B.A., M.A, ***** The Ohio State University 1973 Reading Committee: Approved By Dr. William R. Brown Dr. James L. Golden ^ ^ Dr. John J. Makay ^ Adviser Department of Communication ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge the assistance of several people who have been instrumental in the development and completion of this project. First, I am indebted to the theorists upon whose work this study is built. American literary critic Kenneth Burke, Belgian philosopher Chaim Perelman, and British epistemologist Stephen Toulmin were all kind, understanding, and helpful in my individual interviews with them. My appreciation of the breadth and depth of their treatment of argumentation and rhetoric arose mainly from observing them apply their own theorizing to concrete human activities. For the privilege of such observation, 1 am much appreciative. Secondly, though 1 wish to acknowledge the encouragement of many of my Instructors and peers at The Ohio State University, two instructors deserve special thanks. Professor James L. Golden has been a constant source of inspiration, information, and wise counsel. A great scholar in his own right, 1 am especially indebted to him for allowing me to share in his research activities and concerns for the field. My adviser, Professor William R. Brown, deserves recognition for his tireless efforts to challenge my thinking in the project. He is an exceptionally fine and demanding critic, but 1 thank him most for the stimulating dialogue we ii have shared over the past year— dialogue which never failed to reveal some new idea or potential insight. Finally, I want to acknowledge the help of my wife, Ann, When 1 experienced the traditional pangs of frustration, she responded with support and reassurance beyond normal expectations. She is a comfort, a good critic, and— though we had not planned it that way— the typist of the manuscript. It was only with her help, and the assistance of our families, that the project could have been completed. iii VITA March 14, 1947 .... Born - Clrclevllle, Ohio 1969 ............... B.A., Bowling Green University, Bowling Green, Ohio 1969-1970... ........ Teacher, Willis Intermediate School, Delaware, Ohio 1970-1971 ........ Teacher, Grandview Heights High School, Columbus, Ohio 1971 . M.A., The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1971-1973...... Teaching Associate, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio PUBLICATIONS "Kenneth Burke's Concept of Motives in Rhetorical Theory." Today's Speech. 20 (Winter 1972), 11-18. (with John J. Makay). "What Can You Believe About Rhetoric?" Exploration in Speech Communication. Edited by John J. Makay,.- Columbus, 0.': Charles E. Merrill, 1973. "A Situational Approach to Purposeful Nonverbal Communication." Exploration in Speech Communication. Edited by John J. Makay. Columbus, 0.: Charles E. Merrill, 1973. "The Rhetorical Strategies of Governor John J, Gilligan in his 1970 Campaign." Ohio Speech Journal. 10 (1972), 25-32. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Communication Studies in Rhetorical Theory, Professors James L. Golden, William R. Brown, John J. Makay iv Studies in Communication Theory. Professors Franklin Knower, Wallace Fotheringham, and Donald Cegala Studies in Mass Media* Professors Walter Emery and Joseph Foley Studies in Public Address, Professors Goodwin Berquist, Jr, and William R. Brown v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................... ii VITA ................................................... iv Chapter I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 1 The Relationship between Valuing and Knowing Justification of the Study A Review of Selected Relevant Literature Specific Hypotheses Method of Inquiry II. THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF RHETORIC AS ARCHITECTONIC OF VALUING AND K N O W I N G ....... 37 Introduction The Justification for Knowing The Standards for Knowing The Framework for Knowing The Standardization and Evolution of Knowing Summary, Synthesis, and Speculation III. CASE STUDIES OF RHETORIC AS ARCHITECTONIC OF VALUING AND KNOWING ........... 115 Introduction A Case Study of Valuing and Knowing in the Humanities A Case Study of Valuing and Knowing in the Social Sciences A Case Study of Valuing and Knowing in the Physical Sciences Summary and Synthesis IV. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND IMPLICATIONS OF RHETORIC AS ARCHITECTONIC OF VALUING AND KNOWING 181 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The Prospect of Rhetoric, Richard McKeon speculated about rhetoric as an "architectonic art": "an art of structuring all principles and products of knowing, doing, and making."*’ McKeon's suggestion— as did the Prospect itself— prompted both 2 applause and criticism: applause from those who advocated a revision and expansion of the traditional scope of rhetoric; and criticism from those who warned a field without reasonable boundaries is no field at all. Amidst mingled applause and criticism, however, I began to wonder if the notion advanced by McKeon wa3, in fact, novel in nature: all he had said was that an architectonic art "should be positive in the creation, not passive in the reception, of data, facts, consequences, and objective organizations. It should be an art in which what any one says to be the case, judges to be good or evil, connects ^■Richard McKeon, "The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts," in The Prospect of Rhetoric. ed. by Lloyd F, Bitzer and Edwin Black (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1971), p. 45. 2 I refer especially to the several discussions I had about the book and the paper while I attended the SCA Doctoral Honors Seminar, "The 'New' Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman," Temple University, Dec. 3-5, 1972. in relations, and establishes with some show of system and princi- 3 pies, is relevant as subject-matter, content, and product." Gould rhetoric Indeed be an all-encompassing structuring method? More to my immediate concern: was not it thought of largely as such already by several major contemporary theorists? Kenneth Burke, for example, has delineated four "perspec­ tives" that one could bring to bear on the world: the poetical, 4 the scientific, the philosophical, and the rhetorical. Anything, Burke contended, could be analyzed from (say) the rhetorical perspective. The results of the analysis, of course, will vary. 5 One can analyze a rock from the rhetorical perspective; the yields will be minimal. But what about human behavior--all of it? Cannot it all be analyzed in the light of rhetoric? Burke's answer: There is rhetoric in all such behavior; that is, nearly everything can be examined for the rhetorical aspects of the behavior. In the context of such a potential, cannot rhetoric be viewed as an essential structuring system of human behavior? Is it not therefore at least somewhat "architectonic"? Philosopher Chaim Perelman also interprets the study of rhetoric broadly--especially as opposed to the narrow intellectual %cKeon, "Uses of Rhetoric," p. 63. ^Interview with Kenneth Burke, Englewood, Florida, March 23-24, 1972. 5 Ibid., the rock example is precisely the one Burke used when we discussed the matter. confines of formal logic.® Perelman's primary contention is that rhetoric is simply informal reasoning and argumentation; that is, he has argued, any reasoning process not confined to the realm of the formalized is a part of the activity known as rhetoric. Perelman agrees that the logician's goal of formalizing "everything" is a worthy one; on the other hand, Perelman asks, what is to be done with human affairs while we await the formali­ zation of "everything"? Perelman's answer is that we study the importance of argumentation in the world of human conduct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anthropoetics V, 1
    Anthropoetics V, 1 Anthropoetics V, no. 1 Spring / Summer 1999 ISSN 1083-7264 Table of Contents 1. Erik Eisel - "In the Beginning was the Word...": The Question of the Origin of Language in Goethe's Faust 2. William Mishler - The Question of the Origin of Language in René Girard, Eric Gans, and Kenneth Burke 3. Herbert Plutschow - An Anthropological Perspective on the Japanese Tea Ceremony 4. Eric Gans - The Little Bang: The Early Origin of Language 5. Benchmarks Eric Gans / [email protected] Last updated 7/23/99 http://steadr/anthropoetics/0501/ [5/10/2000 10:29:48 AM] Eisel Anthropoetics 5, no. 1 (Spring/Summer 1999) "In the Beginning was the Word...": The Question of the Origin of Language in Goethe's Faust Erik M. Eisel Department of Germanic Languages University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles CA 90095-1539 [email protected] Beginning with the Age of Goethe, the history of the question of the origin of language follows from the general questions, "What is man?" "What is culture?" and "What is language?"(1) The Berlin Academy of Sciences conjectured in its Preisfrage of 1769 whether human beings, "abandoned to their natural faculties," are capable of inventing language. In response, the first sentence of Johann Gottfried Herder's winning "Essay on the Origin of Language" gives the starting point for new anthropological thinking in the eighteenth century, changing the history of this question: "Already as an animal the human being has language."(2) As Helmut Mueller-Sievers, the author of Self-Generation: Biology, Philosophy, and Literature Around 1800, points out, Herder's rhetorical procedure is an attempt to deny both empirical and divine origins of language while unifying his philosophical project within the domain of language: The quest for a satisfactory explanation for the origin and status of language at the end of the eighteenth century is, historically and structurally, related to the debate about the origin of living beings.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Rhetoric Project As a Response to Anti-Semitism: Chaïm Perelman’S Reflections on Assimilation1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Open Research Exeter The New Rhetoric Project as a Response to Anti-Semitism: Chaïm Perelman’s Reflections on Assimilation1 Michelle Bolduc Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca have both been recognized for their tireless efforts on behalf of Jews: Perelman, himself a Jew, was praised for his work with the Jewish Resistance group, the Comité de la Défense des Juifs [CDJ], which was founded in his living room in June 1942; he was also noted for his postwar activities, including the Aliyah Bet movement immediately following the war.2 Olbrechts-Tyteca, for her part, was honored as one of the ‘Righteous among the Nations’ by Yad Vashem in 1980 for her work on the Comité des Marraines [Godmother Committee] founded by Fela Perelman, which hid Belgian Jewish children during the second World War.3 The present study does not have Perelman’s and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s work on behalf of the Jews as its subject; this has been amply described elsewhere (by, among others, Frank 1997, 2003, 2004, 2014; Steinberg 1978; Gross and Dearin 2003). It is rather an exploration of how they (and Perelman in particular) translate their experiences (direct and indirect) of anti-Semitism into the philosophical meditations of the Traité and the other writings that make up the New Rhetoric Project [NRP].4 If, as Amos Kiewe has pointed out, “scholarship on anti-Semitism from a rhetorical perspective is almost none existent” (vii), scholarship on the NRP’s response to anti-Semitism is, to date, slim.
    [Show full text]
  • TOTE Criticism: Speech Communication: Unions
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 199 609 CS 205 688 TITLE Rhetoric and Public Address: Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations Pliblished in "Dissertation Abstracts International," January through June 1980 (Vol. (10 Nos. 7 through 12). INSTITUTION ERIC Clearinghouse.on Reading and Communication Skills, Urbana, Ill. 0_ PUB DATE 80 TOTE 13p.: Pages may be marginally legible. EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage). DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies,: Churches; *Communication Research: Connected Discourse; Content Analysis; *Discourse Analysis: *Doctoral Dissertations: Organizational Communication: *Persuasive Discourse: Political Science; Politics; *Public Speaking: Religibus Organizations: *Rhetoric; *Rhetorical Criticism: Speech Communication: Unions; Womens Studies ABSTRACT This collection of abstracts is-part of a continuing . 'series'providing information on recent doctorgl dissertations.The'20 titles deal with-A variety oftopics, including the following: (1) the campaign communication during the Carter-Pordtelevision debates: (2) apprehensiveness and performance inpublic speaking; (3)a history and criticism 9f-the Vietnam antivar;movement:((4). a case study of institutional rhetoric and radical :Change (thecontemporary Roman Catholic Church in America):(5) synthesizing methodologies' used,:in the study of political communication during the 1976United States presidential election campaign:(6) the audience effects of (7) rhetorical vision and black social reality: 4 apoliogetic discourse: (8),a case study of organizational apologia. (theAmerican Federation of Labor, 1945-1956): and rhetorical analysesof the speeches/discourses of (9) Dorothy bay for the Catholic Worker movement, (10) British Conservative Party leader MargaretThatcher., (11) Charles Betts Galloway,(12) Carl Schurz,(13) Cleveland mayoral Candidate Arnold Pinkney,(14) Richard Nixon on Vietnam, (15) United States Senator Wayne Morse on Vietnam, (16) Supreme Court Justice Wilgam 0. Douglas on the First Amendment, (17)'U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Key Terms of Dramatism
    INTRODUCTION: THE FIVE KEY TERMS OF DRAMATISM WHAT is involved, when we say what people are doing and why they are doing it? An answer to that question is the subject of this book. The book is concerned with the basic forms of thought which, in ac- cordance with the nature of the world as all men necessarily experience it, are exemplified in the attributing of motives. These forms of thought can be embodied profoundly or trivially, truthfully or falsely. They are equally present in systematically elaborated metaphysical structures, in legal judgments, in poetry and fiction, in political and scientific works, in news and in bits of gossip offered at random. We shall use five terms as generating principle of our investigation. They are: Act, Scene, Agent, Agency, Purpose. In a rounded state- ment about motives, you must have some word that names the act (names what took place, in thought or deed), and another that names the scene (the background of the act, the situation in which it oc- curred) ; also, you must indicate what person or kind of person {agent) performed the act, what means or instruments he used {agency), and the purpose. Men may violently disagree about the purposes behind a given act, or about the character of the person who did it, or how he did it, or in what kind of situation he acted; or they may even insist upon totally different words to name the act itself. But be that as it may, any complete statement about motives will offer some kind of an- swers to these five questions: what was done (act), when or where it was done (scene), who did it (agent), how he did it (agency), and why (purpose).
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Arthur Alvin Vanderveen, Jr. 2002
    Copyright by Arthur Alvin VanderVeen, Jr. 2002 The Dissertation Committee for Arthur Alvin VanderVeen, Jr. certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Other Minds, Other Worlds: Pragmatism, Hermeneutics, and Constructive Modernism, 1890-1942 Committee: _________________________________ Warwick Wadlington, Co-Supervisor _________________________________ Phillip Barrish, Co-Supervisor _________________________________ Katherine Arens _________________________________ Evan Carton _________________________________ Brian Bremen Other Minds, Other Worlds: Pragmatism, Hermeneutics, and Constructive Modernism, 1890-1942 by Arthur Alvin VanderVeen Jr., B.A., M.Div., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2002 “The more we see, the more we think; while the more we think, the more we see in our immediate experience, and the greater grows the detail, and the more significant the articulateness of our perception.” William James Acknowledgments For their support, I would like to acknowledge the University of Texas at Austin Graduate School for a University Fellowship, the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation for an Ernest Hemingway Research Grant, and the Mellon Foundation for a Summer Seminar Grant. I cannot claim that this support speeded the completion of this project, but it did allow me to pursue my research interests more broadly and deeply than I would otherwise have been able. I extend my sincerest thanks to Warwick Wadlington, whose appreciation for the particularity and fullness of the world has taught me to avoid simple binaries and remain open to the disturbing details that lead to new insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Occult Invention: the Rebirth of Rhetorical Heuresis
    OCCULT INVENTION: THE REBIRTH OF RHETORICAL HEURESIS IN EARLY MODERN BRITISH LITERATURE FROM CHAPMAN TO SWIFT by MICHAEL CHARLES MCCANN A DISSERTATION Presented to the Comparative Literature Program and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2011 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Michael Charles McCann Title: Occult Invention: The Rebirth of Rhetorical Heuresis in Early Modern British Literature from Chapman to Swift This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Comparative Literature Program by: Dianne Dugaw Co-Chairperson John T. Gage Co-Chairperson Kenneth Calhoon Member Steven Shankman Member Jeffrey Librett Outside Member and Kimberly Andrews Espy Vice President for Research and Innovation/Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2011. ii © 2011 Michael Charles McCann iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Michael C. McCann Doctor of Philosophy Comparative Literature Program September 2011 Title: Occult Invention: The Rebirth of Rhetorical Heuresis in Early Modern British Literature from Chapman to Swift Approved: _______________________________________________ Dianne Dugaw Approved: _______________________________________________ John T. Gage The twentieth-century project of American rhetorician Kenneth Burke, grounded in a magic-based theory of language, reveals a path to the origins of what I am going to call occult invention. The occult, which I define as a symbol set of natural terms derived from supernatural terms, employs a method of heuresis based on a metaphor-like process I call analogic extension.
    [Show full text]
  • REVELATORY VERNACULAR RHETORIC on the INTERNET By
    PASSAGES DIVINELY LIT: REVELATORY VERNACULAR RHETORIC ON THE INTERNET By ROBERT GLENN HOWARD A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of English and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2001 ii "Passages Divinely Lit: Revelatory Vernacular Rhetoric on the Internet," a dissertation prepared by Robert Glenn Howard in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of English. This dissertation has been approved and accepted by: Dr. Daniel Wojcik, Chair of the Examining Committee Date Committee in charge: Dr. Daniel Wojcik, Chair Dr. James Crosswhite Dr. David Frank Dr. John Gage Dr. Sharon Sherman Accepted by: Dean of the Graduate School iii © 2001 Robert Glenn Howard iv An Abstract of the Dissertation of Robert Glenn Howard for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English to be taken August 2001 Title: PASSAGES DIVINELY LIT: REVELATORY VERNACULAR RHETORIC ON THE INTERNET Approved: Dr. Daniel Wojcik Since the advent of the public World-Wide-Web in 1992, networked computer communication has rapidly become integral to the daily lives of many North Americans. Many researchers in the humanities and social sciences debate the potential power and nature of the effects of these new forms of communication. Some scholars see dangers in the changing forms of "media literacy," but others see the Internet engendering new levels of democratic debate at grassroots and personal levels. However, much of this research still lacks the basic methodological rigor necessary to make reasonable claims about actual individual human communicative behavior on the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Magic Spell: Radical Theories of Folk and Fairy Tales
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Folklore Anthropology 7-5-2002 Breaking the Magic Spell: Radical Theories of Folk and Fairy Tales Jack Zipes Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Zipes, Jack, "Breaking the Magic Spell: Radical Theories of Folk and Fairy Tales" (2002). Folklore. 15. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_folklore/15 Breaking the Magic Spell Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright O 1979 by Jack Zipes Published 2002 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. - Editorial and Sales Ofices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Zipes, Jack Breaking the magic spell. 1. Tales, European-History and criticism. 2. Literature and society. I. Title ISBN-10: 0-8131-9030-4 (paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-8131-9030-3 This book is printed on acid-free recycled paper meeting the requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence in Paper for Printed Library Materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric by Scott R
    KSO 2016: 42 Review Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric by Scott R. Stroud Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press [ISBN: 978-0-271-06419-2 hb] John Poulakos, University of Pittsburgh t a time when the lines of demarcation between philo- sophy and rhetoric are nowhere as clear as they were in A the eighteenth century, Scott Stroud has written an impressive monograph mining Immanuel Kant’s philosophy for rhetorical gold. Postulating that every philosopher (indeed, every author) has a philosophy of rhetoric, even if only implicit or unconscious, this project resembles the likes of Martin Warner’s Philosophical Finesse, Jeff Mason’s Philosophical Rhetoric, Steve Fuller’s Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge, Chaim Perelman’s The New Rhetoric and the Humanities, to name a few. Likewise, Stroud’s inquiry is in line with the spirit of Philosophy and Rhetoric, a journal that has since 1968 been publishing scholarship on the rhetorical dimension of philosophical works as well as the philosophical underpinnings of rhetorical discourses. Beyond the above two similarities, however, Stroud’s work occupies a unique place; no student of rhetoric has delved so deeply into Kant’s corpus or advanced so sympathetic an interpretation of “Kantian rhetoric.” Stroud acknowledges upfront that Kant’s disparaging re- marks against rhetoric are difficult to finesse or explain away. Just the same, he takes on the challenge, seeking to reconcile what Kant says about rhetoric with what he does when he himself puts the techne into practice. Readers of this book will recognize the implicit argument at hand — it has been ad- John Poulakos Review of Scott R.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentadic Ratios in Burke's Theory of Dramatism Dramatism Kenneth Burke
    Ross 1 Pentadic Ratios in Burke’s Theory of Dramatism Dramatism Kenneth Burke (1945) introduced his theory of “dramatism” in his book A Grammar of Motives, saying,“[I]t invites one to consider the matter of motives in a perspective that, being developed from the analysis of drama, treats language and thought primarily as modes of action” (p. xxii). Burke (1978) later explains that the term “dramatism” stems from the idea that language is viewed “primarily as a mode of action rather than as a mode of knowledge, though the two emphases are by no means mutually exclusive” (p. 330). His belief that humans are symbol-users and that symbolic action is both public and unavoidable (Burke, 1978; Kneupper, 1979) led to the creation of dramatism. Dramatistic theory takes into account the nature of language and symbolism. The theory expands on ideas of “identification,” guilt, tropes and figures, and Burke’s “pentad” of terms for analysis, in addition to much more throughout his work. Burke’s theories emerged as a fusion of Freudian psychology and Marxist ideologies (Smith, 2009). Dramatism acts as a method and meta-method, in that the questions raised by a dramatistic inquiry question both the action and analyze the effect of the explanation of action (Overington, 1977). Dramatism, therefore, is a “logic of inquiry” for examining rhetoric, with a fundamental emphasis on motive: “the language of motives, motives in language, language as motive” (Overington, 1977, p. 133). The various aspects of dramatism offer ways to view the world generally and analyze public discourse and action specifically.
    [Show full text]
  • For Peer Review Only
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE An Introduction to and Translation of Chaïm Perelman’s 1933 De l’arbitraire dans laconnaissance [On the Arbitrary in Knowledge] AUTHORS Bolduc, M; Frank, DA JOURNAL Advances in the History of Rhetoric DEPOSITED IN ORE 11 March 2019 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/36397 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Advances in the History of Rhetoric For Peer Review Only A Commentary on and Translation of C haim Perelman’s 1933 “De l’arbitraire dans la connaissance” [On the Arbitrary in Knowledge] Journal: Advances in the History of Rhetoric Manuscript ID Draft Manuscript Type: Translation Keywords: Chaïm Perelman, New Rhetoric Project, arbitrary in knowledge, translation URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 77 Advances in the History of Rhetoric 1 2 3 A Commentary on and Translation of Chaim Perelman’s 1933 “De l’arbitraire dans la 4 5 6 connaissance” [On the Arbitrary in Knowledge] 7 8 9 10 11 “Two writers whom historians of twentieth-century rhetorical theory are sure to feature,” 12 13 writes Wayne Brockriede, “are Kenneth Burke and Chaïm Perelman. They may dominate an 14 For Peer Review Only 15 account of rhetorical theory in this century as Adam Smith and George Campbell dominate 16 17 18 Wilbur Samuel Howell’s characterization of eighteenth-century” (76).
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Disagreement, Deep Rhetoric, and Cultural Diversity
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 12: Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity Jun 5th, 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM Deep Disagreement, Deep Rhetoric, and Cultural Diversity Jianfeng Wang University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive Part of the Philosophy Commons Wang, Jianfeng, "Deep Disagreement, Deep Rhetoric, and Cultural Diversity" (2020). OSSA Conference Archive. 8. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA12/Friday/8 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Conference Proceedings at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in OSSA Conference Archive by an authorized conference organizer of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Deep Disagreement, Deep Rhetoric, and Cultural Diversity: Argumentative Style in a Cross-Cultural “Rhetorical Borderland” JIANFENG WANG Argumentation Studies Program 2183 Chrysler Hall North, University of Windsor 401 Sunset Ave., Windsor, ON N9B 3P4 Canada College of Foreign Languages Fujian Normal University 8 Shangsan Rd., Fuzhou 350007, Fujian Province China [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Taking issue with the current scholarship over the notion of a “rhetorical borderland,” we approach it as a disputable space in cross-cultural argumentation where arguers run into encounters with a composite audience. By drawing upon a few different theoretical resources, we propose a three-dimensional agenda for a new understanding of “rhetorical borderland”: as a discursive construct in the mental horizon; as a conceptual notion with essential uncertainties; and as a disputable space in cross-cultural argumentation. Keywords: Community of minds, deep disagreement, deep rhetoric, incommensurability, style, cross-cultural argumentation 1.
    [Show full text]