DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Harmonisation. Myth Or Reality?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IMPROVING ATM NETWORK PERFORMANCE Skyway SPRING 2012 magazine IN THIS ISSUE: EUROPEAN AIR TRAFFIC: LONGTERM TRENDS IN A NEW DIRECTION DEALING EFFICIENTLY WITH STORMS, SNOW AND SOCIAL UNREST THE AIRPORT RISING TO THECHALLENGE OF BOTTLENECK GLOBAL HARMONISATION. MYTH OR REALITY? THIS IS HOW GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT HARMONISATION The world’s air transportation system is fragmented and ineffi cient. That’s why it’s essential to create an air traffi c management system that links disparate systems into a harmonious whole. At Lockheed Martin, we’re working with industry partners to develop technologies that will increase capacity, provide performance enhancements and cost savings, and create the harmonious air traffi c management system of the future. Building next-generation air transportation is all a CONNECTING question of how. And it is the how that Lockheed Martin delivers. THE NETWORK lockheedmartin.com/how A proactive role for EUROCONTROL Skyway Cover Final.indd 1 20/02/2012 14:51 300-62830_RisingChallenge_SM.indd 1 1/19/12 10:47 AM fewer delays, Airbus ProSky is committed to shaping the imagine the future of global Air Traffic Management, better performance, working side-by-side with ANSPs, airports future of ATM and airlines to build a truly collaborative lower emissions. system with greater capacity, efficiency and sustainability for all stakeholders. Together, with our portfolio of intelligent ATM solutions, air traffic flow management, performance- based navigation, surface management and groundbreaking research and development capabilities, that future begins today. www.AirbusProSky.com tomorrow’s sky, today. www.metronaviation.com | www.quovadisway.com | www.atrics.com Airbus-ProSky-Ad-SkyWay.inddUntitled-1 2 1 21/02/2012 09:12 Untitled-1 3 1/26/1221/02/2012 10:19 09:12 AM ARINC_Skyways_January_2012.pdf 1 12/01/2012 12:11 Skyway 5 Managing Editors Contacts Kyla Evans, Lucia Pasquini, Catherine De Smedt Lucia Pasquini Managing Editor Editor E: [email protected] Philip Butterworth-Hayes T: +32 2 729 34 20 F: +32 2 729 91 98 Design thePAGEDESIGN Philip Butterworth-Hayes Editor Advertising E: [email protected] Tim Henderson, Media 7 T: +44 1273 724 238 F: +44 1273 720 735 Printing Stephens & George Print Group Distribution Natalie Cleur, Media 7 PMI Media Ltd 61 Davigdor Road, Hove BN3 1RA, UK For more information and to receive a free www.pmi-media.com copy of Skyway, please contact the Editor Philip Butterworth-Hayes or Natalie Cleur, Director, Media 7 UK Ltd This document is published on behalf Tim Henderson of EUROCONTROL by PMI Media Ltd Managing Director, Media 7 UK Ltd and Media7 Ltd in the interests of E: [email protected] exchange of information. T: +44 20 3286 4925 Images: iStockphoto, shutterstock Natalie Cleur Client Director, Media 7 UK Ltd EUROCONTROL E: [email protected] 96, rue de la Fusée, T: +44 20 3239 0732 1130 Brussels, 2 Dyers Buildings, London EC1N 2JT, UK Belgium www.media-7.co.uk www.eurocontrol.int © European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) March 2012. All rights reserved. The entire contents of this publication are protected by copyright. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EUROCONTROL. The reproduction of advertisements in this publication does not in any way imply endorsement of their content by PMI Media Ltd and Media 7 or EUROCONTROL. The views expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policy of EUROCONTROL. Spring 2012 | www.eurocontrol.int p5.indd 1 20/02/2012 14:25 few words, many facts ESA Iris – ANTARES Project n Thales Alenia Space is prime contractor. few words, many facts n From Navigation to Aerocommunications: from GNSS few words, many facts systems to Iris for a safer airspace in Europe. n More safety, more flights, more passengers, less pollution, less consumption, less costs. n GEO satellite coverage up to 75° plus optional HEO satellites to have full global coverage. n A new ad-hoc Communication standard (to fulfill COCR V2 ) for ATS/AOC services validated with a Verification Test Bed, User Terminal prototypes and Ground Earth Station prototype. ESA Iris Did you know? ESA Iris Thales Alenia Space is the European key-player ESA Iris – ANTARES Project for enabling aeronautical safety of life satellite systems • Thales Alenia Space is prime contractor. • Thales Alenia Space is prime contractor. • From Navigation to Aerocommunications: from GNSS n • From Navigation to Aerocommunications: from GNSS Satellite is the enabler technology for a safer sky: from Navigation to Aerocommunication systems to Iris for a safer airspace in Europe. systems to Iris for a safer airspace in Europe. n Satellite is the worldwide answer for aviation SoL Services • More safety, more flights, more passengers, less • More safety, more flights, more passengers, less n Satellite is one of the main technologies for the future Single European Sky pollution, less consumption, less costs. pollution, less consumption, less costs. • GEO satellite coverage up to 75° plus optional HEO n Thales Alenia Space is the key player for design and development of future ATM SATCOM infrastructure • GEO satellite coverage up to 75° plus optional HEO satellites to have full global coverage. satellites to have full global coverage. • A new ad-hoc Communication standard (to fulfill COCR • A new ad-hoc Communication standard (to fulfill COCR V2 ) for ATS/AOC services validated with a Verification Thales Alenia Space is world leader in satellite-based navigation systems V2 ) for ATS/AOC services validated with a Verification Test Bed, User Terminal prototypes and Ground Earth Test Bed, User Terminal prototypes and Ground Earth With more than 15 years of expertise in the field of satellite navigation, both through EGNOS and Galileo, Station prototype. Station prototype. Thales Alenia Space is the key player in Europe’s efforts to set up its own capacity in regional and global positioning. Navigation & Integrated Communications Navigation & Integrated Communications Thales Alenia Space Italia S.p.A. Thales Alenia Space Italia S.p.A. 24, Via Saccomuro 24, Via Saccomuro 00131, Rome 00131, Rome Italy Italy Navigation & Integrated Communications Visit us at: www.thalesaleniaspace.com Thales Alenia Space Italia S.p.A. Visit us at: www.thalesaleniaspace.com 24, Via Saccomuro 00131, Rome Italy Visit us at: www.thalesaleniaspace.com THALES ALENIA NEW DPS.indd 2 20/02/2012 11:43 THALES ALENIA NEW DPS.indd 3 20/02/2012 11:43 Skyway 9 Amsterdam Washington 52° 21’ 0” N / 4° 55’ 0” E 47° 23’ 30” N / 121° 34’ 14” W Abu Dhabi 24° 28’ 0” N / 54° 22’ 0” E Bangkok 13° 45’ 0” N / 100° 31’ 0” E Johannesburg 26° 12’ 0” S / 28° 5’ 0” E NUMBER 56 | SPRING 2012 SAVE THE DATE EDITORIAL 42 Airport collaboration pays 77 Collaborative decision-making ATC GLOBAL 2013 huge dividends goes nationwide 11 Jacques Dopagne, EUROCONTROL’s Erik Sinz, A-CDM Programme Director Network Management 46 ATM network performance: Manager with DFS Deutsche must do better Flugsicherung GmbH EXHIBITION AND CONFERENCE WAYPOINTS 54 Under starter’s orders 80 Growing hub operations require closer collaboration 14 Airborne surveillance capability milestone 59 Learning to love the Director General Saif Al Suwaidi of the 12-14 MARCH, AMSTERDAM RAI reached; RVSM benefits spread to Eastern Network Manager United Arab Emirates General Civil Europe, Eurasia; Maastricht and Karlsruhe Aviation Authority (GCAA) extend free route airspace; EGNOS 64 FABEC takes on the approvals extend beyond Europe; challenge of seamless sky 85 Service providers and airports SESAR JU prepares for development “need to be more proactive” phase; news in brief Flemming Jensens, Executive VIEWPOINTS Vice President, Chief Operating CONNECTING THE INTERNATIONAL ATM Officer and Accountability Manager FOCUS 68 Has the capacity crunch with Scandinavian airline SAS been overhyped? COMMUNITY FOR NEARLY 25 YEARS 18 Traffic trends: the future Jacques Dopagne, EUROCONTROL’s will not be like the past Director Network Management, TAIL END Olivier Jankovec, Director General, 22 Something has changed Airports Council International (ACI) 89 Calendar of events Europe and Anthony van der Veldt, 26 Towards a new horizon Assistant Director Safety, Operations 90 Advertising index Organised by and Infrastructure – Europe at the 31 Airlines need to see improvements International Air Transport Association (IATA) WWW.ATCGLOBALHUB.COM 36 At the heart of crisis management Spring 2012 | www.eurocontrol.int p9.indd 1 20/02/2012 14:26 C30440.003_Thales_ATM_Skyway_Mar12_297x210_v1_ATM 15/02/2012 16:43 Page 1 Skyway 11 ATM. Better decisions deliver better outcomes. EDITORIAL A CRITICAL YEAR Safer skies? Long-term Increasing air traffic efficiency support? makes new solutions essential Optimising Offering a complete range controller workloads? of extended services Providing integrated technology enables controllers to focus on their primary roles Cyber security? Dear readers, importance of the air transport with a set of transparent tools so network to the European economy they can see the consequences Ensuring data integrity protection Greener ATM? against cyber threats is vital This year will be a critical one for to be fully understood, at a political of their decisions within the Optimising flight profiles with reduced overall network. The good news holding patterns, cuts carbon emission Europe’s air transport sector and, as well as a personal level. and fuel consumption of course, the wider European The transformation of is that there is now a growing economy. By December 2012, EUROCONTROL from a facilitator acceptance of the need for a network of nine functional to a driver of improved air traffic ‘network thinking’ by everyone airspace blocks is due to be in management performance, concerned; this is a major step place.
Recommended publications
  • IGC Plenary 2005

    IGC Plenary 2005

    Agenda of the Annual Meeting of the FAI Gliding Commission To be held in Lausanne, Switzerland on 5th and 6th March 2010 Agenda for the IGC Plenary 2010 Day 1, Friday 5th March 2010 Session: Opening and Reports (Friday 09.15 – 10.45) 1. Opening (Bob Henderson) 1.1 Roll Call (Stéphane Desprez/Peter Eriksen) 1.2 Administrative matters (Peter Eriksen) 1.3 Declaration of Conflicts of Interest 2. Minutes of previous meeting, Lausanne, 6th-7th March 2009 (Peter Eriksen) 3. IGC President’s report (Bob Henderson) 4. FAI Matters (Mr.Stéphane Desprez) 4.1 Update by the Secretary General 5. Finance (Dick Bradley) 5.1 2009 Financial report 5.2 Financial statement and budget 6. Reports not requiring voting 6.1 OSTIV report (Loek Boermans) Please note that reports under Agenda items 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 are made available on the IGC web-site, and will not necessarily be presented. The Committees and Specialists will be available for questions. 6.2 Standing Committees 6.2.1 Communications and PR Report (Bob Henderson) 6.2.2 Championship Management Committee Report (Eric Mozer) 6.2.3 Sporting Code Committee Report (Ross Macintyre) 6.2.4 Air Traffic, Navigation, Display Systems (ANDS) Report (Bernald Smith) 6.2.5 GNSS Flight Recorder Approval Committee (GFAC) Report (Ian Strachan) 6.2.6 FAI Commission on Airspace and Navigation Systems (CANS) Report (Ian Strachan) Session: Reports from Specialists and Competitions (Friday 11.15 – 12.45) 6.3 Working Groups 6.3.1 Country Development Report (Alexander Georgas) 6.3.2 Grand Prix Action Plan (Bob Henderson) 6.3.3 History Committee (Tor Johannessen) 6.3.4 Scoring Working Group (Visa-Matti Leinikki) 6.4 IGC Specialists 6.4.1 CASI Report (Air Sports Commissions) (Tor Johannessen) 6.4.2 EGU/EASA Report (Patrick Pauwels) 6.4.3 Environmental Commission Report (Bernald Smith) 6.4.4 Membership (John Roake) 6.4.5 On-Line Contest Report (Axel Reich) 6.4.6 Simulated Gliding Report (Roland Stuck) 6.4.7 Trophy Management Report (Marina Vigorita) 6.4.8 Web Management Report (Peter Ryder) 7.
  • Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA)

    Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA)

    Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA) EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published December 20201 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Disclaimer of the Air (SERA) DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated and easy-to-read publication. It has been prepared by putting together the officially published regulations with the related acceptable means of compliance and guidance material (including the amendments) adopted so far.
  • Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Tool Kit

    Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Tool Kit

    Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Tool Kit PREPARED BY HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP and 4C FOR THE AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. UAS LEGAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................... 2 Hobbyist Use ....................................................................................................... 2 Public Use............................................................................................................ 3 Commercial / Civil Use ......................................................................................... 4 III. UAS REGISTRATION AND MARKING REQUIREMENTS ............................................. 4 IV. FAA SMALL UAS RULE (PART 107) ............................................................................. 5 Part 107 Pilot Certification Requirements ............................................................. 6 General Operating Requirements Under Part 107 ................................................ 8 UAS Requirements .............................................................................................. 9 Effect of Part 107 on Section 333 Exemptions ..................................................... 9 V. PART 107 WAIVERS & AUTHORIZATIONS ................................................................ 10 Relevant Waivers for Refiners and Petrochemical Manufacturers .....................
  • Norbert Fürstenau Editor Research, Design, Development and Validation

    Norbert Fürstenau Editor Research, Design, Development and Validation

    Research Topics in Aerospace Norbert Fürstenau Editor Virtual and Remote Control Tower Research, Design, Development and Validation Research Topics in Aerospace More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/8625 Norbert Fu¨rstenau Editor Virtual and Remote Control Tower Research, Design, Development and Validation Editor Norbert Fu¨rstenau Institute of Flight Guidance German Aerospace Center (DLR) Braunschweig, Germany ISSN 2194-8240 ISSN 2194-8259 (electronic) Research Topics in Aerospace ISBN 978-3-319-28717-1 ISBN 978-3-319-28719-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28719-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016940305 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
  • Name Surname's Phd Thesis

    Name Surname's Phd Thesis

    Università degli Studi di Firenze Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione (DINFO) Corso di Dottorato in Ingegneria dell’Informazione Curriculum: Telematica e Società dell’Informazione SSD M-PSI/01 Concepts of multimodal interactions to support Human Performance in Remote Tower Operations Candidate Rosa De Piano Supervisors Prof. Patrizia Marti Dr. Luca Save PhD Coordinator Prof. Luigi Chisci 1 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Information Engineering. Copyright © 2017 by Rosa De Piano. 2 Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................................... 10 The embodied reMOte TOwer ......................................................................................................... 10 1. Context of the research ......................................................................................................... 11 1.1 The MOTO project ........................................................................................................... 18 1.2 The PhD study ................................................................................................................. 24 Chapter 2 .........................................................................................................................................
  • Flight Operations Pilot and Instructor Techniques For

    Flight Operations Pilot and Instructor Techniques For

    1 FLIGHT OPERATIONS PILOT AND INSTRUCTOR TECHNIQUES FOR OPERATIONS AND FLIGHT MANEUVERS May 9, 2017 Revision 1, July 25, 2017 Revision 2, September 28, 2018 Revision 3, September 25, 2020 2 REVISIONS Revision 1, 07/25/2017 Added Appendix 3, G1000 guide for designated pilot examiners and certified flight instructors. Revision 2, 09/28/2018 P. 25, Technique 17. Third paragraph, entitled Short field takeoff, last sentence, replace “172RG (flaps up, 63 KIAS climb)” with “Arrow.” P. 25, Technique 17. Fourth paragraph, entitled ForeFlight, delete references to IFR and delete “Exceptions.” P. 25, Technique 17. Under Instrument course stage checks, first sentence, delete “ADF and/or.” In the same section, pp.25-26, delete sentence that runs “Also, NDB holding...Instrument stage checks.” Additionally, delete “vacuum failure.” P. 35, Technique 28. First sentence, replace “172RG” with “Arrow.” P. 35, Technique 28. In paragraph ‘1’, Delete the sentence that runs “As soon as...for Vne.” P. 35, Technique 28. Delete paragraph ‘2’ and replace with the following: 2. Arrow: Begin the maneuver at 3,000’ AGL minimum at less than 129 KIAS (Vle.) Smoothly select idle power, landing gear down, bank 45 degrees, and pitch down 5 to 10 degrees nose-low, to achieve - 2,000’ per minute VSI. Do not exceed Vle. The instructor should assign a level-off altitude. The trainee is to lead the level-off and hit it within +/- 100’. Reduce speed to less than 107 KIAS prior to gear retraction. Begin recovery so as to be back in level flight by 1,500’ AGL. In turbulence, do not exceed Va, and accept whatever VSI results from that speed.
  • SAR Are to Be Included

    SAR Are to Be Included

    Project Number 06.08.04 D108 - Single Remote Tower - Safety Assessment Report Edition: 00.02.01 approval review 00.01.01 10th March 2014 Updated Update of section 1.3 clarifying version taking in which other project into account deliverables the results of this SJU review SAR are to be included. 00.01.02 12th October 2015 Updated Update of the list of safety version taking requirements to be in line with into account the latest version of the OSED. OSED update 00.01.03 08 February 2016 Updated Mostly editorial updates. Now version also reviewed by DFS and according to EUROCONTROL. SJU comments. 00.01.04 17th February 2016 Updated Update based on result from version other project activities, in including final particular VP-639 and VP-640. P06.08.04 activities 00.02.00 17th May 2016 Final Final Update 00.02.01 26th July 2016 Final Update considering SJU reservations IPR (foreground) This deliverable consists of SJU foreground. 2 of 149 ©SESAR JOINT UNDERTAKING, 2016. Created by DFS for the SESAR Joint Undertaking within the frame of the SESAR Programme co-financed by the EU and EUROCONTROL. Reprint with approval of publisher and the source properly acknowledged Project Number 06.08.04 D108 - Single Remote Tower - Safety Assessment Report Edition: 00.02.01 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 7 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................
  • Security Assessment of the Remote Operated Tower OFA 06.03.01

    Security Assessment of the Remote Operated Tower OFA 06.03.01

    Project Number 16.06.02 Edition 00.00.02 - 06.03.01 Remote and Virtual Tower Security Risk Assessment Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 5 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 CHANGES FROM THE PREVIOUS VERSION ............................................................................................ 6 1.2 CONTEXT OF THE ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................ 6 1.2.1 Expertise of the assessors ............................................................................................................ 6 1.2.2 Sources of information .................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.3 Scope ............................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.4 Dependencies ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2.5 Assumptions ................................................................................................................................... 8 2 IDENTIFICATION OF PRIMARY ASSETS ............................................................................................
  • Collaborative En Route Airspace Management Considering Stochastic Demand, Capacity, and Weather Conditions

    Collaborative En Route Airspace Management Considering Stochastic Demand, Capacity, and Weather Conditions

    Collaborative En Route Airspace Management Considering Stochastic Demand, Capacity, and Weather Conditions by Jeffrey M. Henderson A dissertation presented to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering Dr. Antonio Trani, Chair Dr. Hojong Baik Dr. Hesham Rakha Dr. Gerardo Flintsch Dr. C. Patrick Koelling March 26, 2008 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Airspace, Thunderstorms, Equity, Air Traffic Control, Simulation Copyright 2008, Jeffrey M. Henderson Collaborative En Route Airspace Management Considering Stochastic Demand, Capacity, and Weather Conditions Jeffrey M. Henderson ABSTRACT The busiest regions of airspace in the U.S. are congested during much of the day from traffic volume, weather, and other airspace restrictions. The projected growth in demand for airspace is expected to worsen this congestion while reducing system efficiency and safety. This dissertation focuses on providing methods to analyze en route airspace congestion during severe convective weather (i.e. thunderstorms) in an effort to provide more efficient aircraft routes in terms of: en route travel time, air traffic controller workload, aircraft collision potential, and equity between airlines and other airspace users. The en route airspace is generally that airspace that aircraft use between the top of climb and top of descent. Existing en route airspace flight planning models have several important limitations. These models do not appropriately consider the uncertainty in airspace demand associated with departure time prediction and en route travel time. Also, airspace capacity is typically assumed to be a static value with no adjustments for weather or other dynamic conditions that impact the air traffic controller.
  • Pilot's Guide

    Pilot's Guide

    250 real 7/14/98 9:31 AM Page i OWNER’S MANUAL & REFERENCE ACTV STBY GNC 250 CLR ENT CRSR SQ NRST RTE WPT NAV MSG GNC 250TM Pilot’s Guide ® 250 real 7/14/98 9:31 AM Page ii 250 real 7/14/98 9:31 AM Page i INTRODUCTION Foreword Software Version 2.06 or above © 1995 GARMIN International 9875 Widmer Road, Lenexa, KS 66215, USA Romsey House, Station Approach Romsey, Hampshire, UK S051 8DU GARMIN™, GNC 250™, Spell’N’Find™, AutoLocate™, MultiTrac8™, GPSCOM™ All rights reserved. No part of this manual may be reproduced or transmitted in any and AutoStore™ are trademarks of GARMIN form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and record- and may only be used with permission. ing, for any purpose without the express written permission of GARMIN. NavData® is a registered trademark of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Information in this document is subject to change without notice. GARMIN reserves All rights reserved. the right to change or improve their products and to make changes in the content of this material without obligation to notify any person or organization of such changes or improvements. October 1995 190-00067-50 Rev. A Printed in USA i 250 real 7/14/98 9:31 AM Page ii INTRODUCTION Cautions CAUTION The Global Positioning System is operated by the United States government, which is solely responsible for its accuracy and maintenance. The system is subject to changes which could affect the accuracy and performance of all GPS equipment. Although the GARMIN GNC 250 is a precision electronic NAVigation AID (NAVAID), any NAVAID can be misused or misinterpreted and therefore become unsafe.
  • Real-Time Monitoring and Prediction of Airspace Safety

    Real-Time Monitoring and Prediction of Airspace Safety

    NASA/TM–2015–218928 Real-Time Monitoring and Prediction of Airspace Safety Indranil Roychoudhury SGT, Inc., NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA Lilly Spirkovska NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA Matthew Daigle NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA Edward Balaban NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA Shankar Sankararaman SGT, Inc., NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA Chetan Kulkarni SGT, Inc., NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA Scott Poll NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA Kai Goebel NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA December 2015 NASA STI Program . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. the advancement of aeronautics and space Collected papers from scientific and technical science. The NASA Scientifi c and Technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other Information (STI) Program plays a key part in meetings sponsored or co-sponsored by helping NASA maintain this important role. NASA. The NASA STI Program operates under the • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, auspices of the Agency Chief Information Offi technical, or historical information from cer. It collects, organizes, provides for archiving, NASA programs, projects, and missions, often and disseminates NASA’s STI. The NASA STI concerned with subjects having substantial Program provides access to the NASA Technical public interest. Report Server—Registered (NTRS Reg) and NASA Technical Report Server— Public (NTRS) • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- thus providing one of the largest collections of language translations of foreign scientific and aeronautical and space science STI in the world. technical material pertinent to NASA’s Results are published in both non-NASA mission.
  • Review of Research

    Review of Research

    Review of ReseaRch REGULATORY CHALLENGES WITH CIVIL DRONES IN INDIA Mohd Owais Farooqui Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, HILSR, Jamia issN: 2249-894X Hamdard University, New Delhi (India) impact factoR : 5.7631(Uif) UGc appRoved JoURNal No. 48514 ABSTRACT: volUme - 8 | issUe - 8 | may - 2019 “Drones technically called as Unmanned Aircraft System( hereafter referred as ‘UAS') are a military technology now being developed for civilian and commercial use across the globe. Drone technology has grown exponentially and the law has to contend its growth. We have reached technological breakthroughs in the form of unmanned aviation as they have reached their fullest potential and ready to be implemented for civilian applications like surveillance, nuclear-biological- chemical (NBC) sensing/tracking, traffic monitoring, flood mapping, crime investigation, police, motion picture, news and media support, cargo transportation, monitoring of sensitive sites (like Fukushima nuclear catastrophe), forests fire monitoring, etc. The manned aircraft which are globally in-use may be replaced with the unmanned aircraft due to its eco-friendly nature based on less CO2 emissions, less noise pollution etc. It has been predicted by Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) that the global market for civilian unmanned aircraft stood at US$11.3bn in 2013 and has the potential to grow to over US$140bn in the next ten years. It further stated that 80 percent of the commercial market for drones eventually will be for agricultural uses. Thus, the emerging civil drone sector across the globe has a wide application and will have a significant impact on jobs, the economy, how business is carried out and the aviation industry.