Conradina Glabra Jason Bladow

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conradina Glabra Jason Bladow Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2010 The Role of Environment and Genetics in the Demography of Introduced and Natural Populations of the Endangered Shrub Conradina Glabra Jason Bladow Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENT AND GENETICS IN THE DEMOGRAPHY OF INTRODUCED AND NATURAL POPULATIONS OF THE ENDANGERED SHRUB CONRADINA GLABRA By JASON BLADOW A Thesis submitted to the Department of Biological Science in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Science Degree Awarded: Fall Semester 2010 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Jason Bladow defended on October 18th, 2010. __________________________________ Alice Winn Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Nora Underwood Committee Member __________________________________ Austin Mast Committee Member Approved: _____________________________________ P. Bryant Chase, Chair, Department of Biological Science The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all of the individuals involved in the completion of my research. Thank you to Austin Mast and Nora Underwood whose comments have helped improve this document. Special thanks belongs to my advisor Alice Winn for the opportunity to expand my scientific expertise and the time she graciously spent making suggestions to improve documents and presentations. The Florida Native Plant Society supplied a grant for this research and without which this research could not have taken place. Thank you very much. Credit belongs to David Prentice of The Nature Conservancy, and Tova Spector of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for allowing me the privilege to study Conradina glabra. I am grateful to the staff of The Nature Conservancy, Torreya State Park, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for their assistance with my research. I would also like to thank Doria Gordon of the Nature Conservancy for providing old data from the previous introductions of Conradina glabra as well as census data from successive years. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables .......................................................................................................................v List of Figures.................................................................................................................... vi Abstract............................................................................................................................ viii 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1 2. A DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF INTRODUCED AND NATURAL POPULATIONS OF CONRADINA GLABRA .............................................................2 Introduction..............................................................................................................2 Method .....................................................................................................................4 Results....................................................................................................................12 Discussion..............................................................................................................24 3. THE EFFECTS OF INBREEDING ON THE DEMOGRAPHY OF AN ENDANGERED PLANT CONRADINA GLABRA ...................................................29 Introduction............................................................................................................29 Methods..................................................................................................................31 Results....................................................................................................................35 Discussion..............................................................................................................39 4. CONCLUSION.............................................................................................................43 APPENDIX A....................................................................................................................44 APPENDIX B ....................................................................................................................45 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................47 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .............................................................................................51 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 The Stage Classes of C. glabra...........................................................................6 Table 1.2 Regression equations used to calculate fecundity from plant size......................8 Table 1.3 The number of stage classes and the breaks between them as determined by the Vandermeer-Moloney algorithm.........................................12 Table 1.4 Estimates of lambda and bootstrapped 95% confidence limits for six study populations. .............................................................................................14 Table 1.5 Means for percent soil moisture and the proportion of area occupied by vegetation, bare ground, and litter at each population. .....................................23 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Life cycle of Conradina glabra.........................................................................7 Figure 1.2 Transition matrices for three introduced and three natural populations..........13 Figure 1.3 Aggregate matrices combining the three populations from each site..............14 Figure 1.4 The frequency of the predicted stage class distribution, compared with the actual distribution.......................................................................................15 Figure 1.5 The stage class frequency distribution for each of six populations of C. glabra at the first census..................................................................................16 Figure 1.6 Sensitivity of Lambda to each element of the transition matrix for each population ........................................................................................................18 Figure 1.7 The summed elasticity for each transition type for each population...............19 Figure 1.8 Sensitivity of Lambda to each matrix element for aggregate matrices for each type of population. .............................................................................20 Figure 1.9 Elasticity values for each element of the aggregate matrices for each type of population. ...........................................................................................21 Figure 1.10 Life Table Response Experiment results........................................................22 Figure 2.1 The average number of seeds per flower produced by each pollination treatment. .........................................................................................................36 Figure 2.2 The germination rate for inbred and outcrossed seeds for each population ........................................................................................................37 Figure 2.3 Matrices for naturally pollinated plants for each population and the same matrices with fecundity values recalculated to reflect the effect of inbreeding depression..................................................................................38 Figure A.1 The LTRE matrix resulting from the analysis.................................................44 Figure A.2 The difference matrix resulting from the subtraction of the natural aggregate matrix from the introduced aggregate matrix ..................................................44 Figure A.3 The sensitivity matrix calculated for the mean matrix of the aggregate natural matrix and the introduced matrix.....................................................................44 vi Figure B.1 Sensitivity matrices for the inbred matrices and original unmodified demographic matrices. .....................................................................................45 Figure B.2 Original elasticity matrix values for each transition types as well as predicted sensitivity values for the modified matrices reflecting the effects of total selfing...............................................................................................................46 vii ABSTRACT Biodiversity continues to decline as many species face extinction. One way to mitigate possible extinction is to introduce new populations of a species to locations that the species does not currently occupy. Such introductions can sometimes fail due to environmental factors or to genetic problems that may arise from small population size. Monitoring introduced populations and collecting data can identify reasons for the success or failure of an introduction and provide valuable information for future management efforts. To evaluate the success of introductions, demographic models can be constructed and analyzed to determine if populations are growing and to identify parts of the life cycle that contribute most to the population growth rate. Conradina glabra is an endangered shrub that was introduced to three sites at the Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve in Liberty County, Florida 1991. Three introduced
Recommended publications
  • Conradina Chapter Meeting Page 2
    Preserving, Conserving, and Restoring the Real Florida Since 1980. October 2020 Inside this issue: Conradina Chapter Meeting Page 2. Carol's Corner Monday, October 12, 2020 6:00 PM Page 3. Calendar Register at https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-11th-annual-landscaping-with-florida- Page 4. Native Plant Tour natives-tour-tickets-119744475951?aff=ebdssbonlinesearch Page 5. Chapter Board and News Individuals that register will receive a list of the plants featured on the tour. To attend online meetings log on to https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQPCjDvXqQLEgzCYqc0EZ5A?view_as =subscriber Everyone can join us for free at Conradina FNPS general meeting on Monday Oct 12 2020. We start at 6 pm so tune in to the meeting on Conradina Grandiflora youtube. Our speaker will be Nicole Perna Assistant Environmental Manager at Brevard County Barrier Island Sanctuary in Melbourne Beach. Conradina FNPS received a Keep Brevard Beautiful grant and helped achieve and enhance the native plants on the sanctuary. I grew up on a small barrier island in Brigantine, NJ where I spent endless days playing and exploring on its beaches and bays. Influenced by my father, I became active in local environmental efforts at an early age. I attend Stockton College locally studying Marine Biology and researching diamondback terrapins. I interned at the Marine Mammal Stranding Center rehabbing seals, dolphins and sea turtles. I moved to Florida after graduating and began work with Brevard County’s Environmentally Endangered Lands Program (EEL) restoring habitats and providing passive recreation opportunities. I also worked at the Brevard Zoo taking care of some amazing creatures like White Rhinos, Next Chapter Meeting Giraffe, Kilspringers, Ostrich etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Backyard Biodiversity Day 2020 List of Native Plants for Sale from Green Isle Gardens Page 1 of 3
    Backyard Biodiversity Day 2020 List of Native Plants for Sale from Green Isle Gardens Common Name Botanical Name Size Adam's needle Yucca filamentosa 1 Gallon Apalachicola Rosemary Conradina glabra 1 Gallon Bear Grass Nolina brittoniana 1 Gallon Beautyberry Callicarpa americana 3 Gallon Beebalm Monarda punctata 1 Gallon Blackeyed Susan Rudbeckia hirta 1 Gallon Blanket Flower Gallardia pulchella 1 Gallon Blazing Star Liatris gracilis 1 Gallon Blazing Star Liatris spicata 1 Gallon Blue Curls Trichostema dichotomum 1 Gallon Blueberry Vaccinium darrowi 3 Gallon Blue-eyed grass Sisyrinchium angustifolium 1 Gallon Broomsedge Andropogon spp 1 Gallon Calamint Calamintha spp. 1 Gallon Cardinal Flower Lobelia cardinalis 1 Gallon Chaulky Bluestem Andropogon spp 1 Gallon chickasaw plum Prunus angustifolia 3 Gallon Coontie Zamia pumila 1 Gallon Coontie Zamia pumila 3 Gallon Coral bean Erythrina herbacea 1 Gallon Coral honeysuckle Lonicera sempervirens 1 Gallon Cordgrass Spartina bakeri 1 Gallon Corn Snakeroot Eryngium aquaticum 1 Gallon crab apple Malus angustifolia 3 Gallon creeping sage Salvia misella 1 Gallon Cross vine Bignonia capreolata 1 Gallon Cutleaf Coneflower Rudbekia laciniata 1 Gallon dune sunflower Heliantus debilis 1 Gallon Dwarf Fakahatchee Tripsacum floridana 1 Gallon Dwarf palmetto Sabal minor 3 Gallon Dwarf Walter's Vib Viburnum obovatum dwarf 3 Gallon Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 1 Gallon Elephant's foot Elephantopus elatus 1 Gallon Fakahatchee Tripsacum dactyloides 1 Gallon false indigo Amorpha fructicosa 1 Gallon Firebush Hamelia
    [Show full text]
  • Groundcover Restoration in Forests of the Southeastern United States
    Groundcover RestorationIN FORESTS OF THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES Jennifer L. Trusty & Holly K. Ober Acknowledgments The funding for this project was provided by a cooperative • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission of resource managers and scientific researchers in Florida, • Florida Department of Environmental Protection Conserved Forest Ecosystems: Outreach and Research • Northwest Florida Water Management District (CFEOR). • Southwest Florida Water Management District • Suwannee River Water Management District CFEOR is a cooperative comprised of public, private, non- government organizations, and landowners that own or We are grateful to G. Tanner for making the project manage Florida forest lands as well as University of Florida possible and for providing valuable advice on improving the faculty members. CFEOR is dedicated to facilitating document. We are also indebted to the many restorationists integrative research and outreach that provides social, from across the Southeast who shared information with J. ecological, and economic benefits to Florida forests on a Trusty. Finally, we thank H. Kesler for assistance with the sustainable basis. Specifically, funding was provided by maps and L. DeGroote, L. Demetropoulos, C. Mackowiak, C. Matson and D. Printiss for assistance with obtaining photographs. Cover photo: Former slash pine plantation with restored native groundcover. Credits: L. DeGroote. Suggested citation: Trusty, J. L., and H. K. Ober. 2009. Groundcover restoration in forests of the Southeastern United States. CFEOR Research Report 2009-01. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 115 pp. | 3 | Table of Contents INTRODUCTION . 7 PART I - Designing and Executing a Groundcover PART II – Resources to Help Get the Job Done Restoration Project CHAPTER 6: Location of Groundcover CHAPTER 1: Planning a Restoration Project .
    [Show full text]
  • Panflora Site Plant List Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve (TNC) Generated: 7 June 2005 Copyright: Gil Nelson 186 Records
    PanFlora Site Plant List Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve (TNC) Generated: 7 June 2005 Copyright: Gil Nelson 186 Records Acer negundo (BOXELDER) Acer rubrum (RED MAPLE) Aesculus pavia (RED BUCKEYE) Agalinis divaricata (PINELAND FALSE FOXGLOVE) Albizia julibrissin (MIMOSA) Amelanchier arborea (COMMON SERVICEBERRY) Arenaria lanuginosa (SPREADING SANDWORT) Arenaria serpyllifolia (THYMELEAF SANDWORT) Arisaema dracontium (GREENDRAGON) Arisaema quinatum (PESTER-JOHN) Arisaema triphyllum (JACK-IN-THE-PULPIT) Aristida stricta beyrichiana (WIREGRASS) Aristolochia serpentaria (VIRGINIA SNAKEROOT) Aristolochia tomentosa (WOOLLY DUTCHMAN'S-PIPE; PIPEVINE) Arundinaria gigantea (SWITCHCANE) Asarum arifolium (WILD GINGER; LITTLE BROWN JUG; HEARTLEAF WILD GINGER) Asimina parviflora (SMALLFLOWER PAWPAW) Asplenium platyneuron (EBONY SPLEENWORT) Athyrium filix-femina asplenioides (SOUTHERN LADY FERN) Aureolaria flava (SMOOTH YELLOW FALSE FOXGLOVE) Baptisia lanceolata (GOPHERWEED) Berlandiera pumila (SOFT GREENEYES) Betula nigra (RIVER BIRCH) Bignonia capreolata (CROSSVINE) Boechera canadensis (SICKLEPOD) Calamintha dentata (FLORIDA CALAMINT; TOOTHED SAVORY) Callicarpa americana (AMERICAN BEAUTYBERRY) Calycanthus floridus (EASTERN SWEETSHRUB; CAROLINA ALLSPICE) Calycocarpum lyonii (CUPSEED) Carex baltzellii (BALTZELL'S SEDGE) Carex digitalis (SLENDER WOODLAND SEDGE) Carex nigromarginata floridana (BLACKEDGE SEDGE) Carpinus caroliniana (AMERICAN HORNBEAM; BLUEBEECH) Carya glabra (PIGNUT HICKORY) Carya pallida (SAND HICKORY) Ceanothus microphyllus (LITTLELEAF
    [Show full text]
  • PALM 31 3 Working.Indd
    Volume 31: Number 3 > 2014 The Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society Palmetto Rare Plant Conservation at Bok Tower Gardens ● Yaupon Redeemed ● The Origin of Florida Scrub Plant Diversity Donna Bollenbach and Juliet Rynear A Collaboration of Passion, Purpose and Science Bok Tower Gardens Rare Plant Conservation Program “Today nearly 30 percent of the native fl ora in the United States is considered to be 1 of conservation concern. Without human intervention, many of these plants may be gone within our lifetime. Eighty percent of the at-risk species are closely related to plants with economic value somewhere in the world, and more than 50 percent are related to crop species...but it can be saved.” – Center for Plant Conservation Ask the average Florida citizen to name at least one endangered native animal in the state and they will likely mention the Florida manatee or the Florida panther. Ask the same person to name one endangered native plant and they give you a blank stare. Those of us working to conserve Florida’s unique plant species know this all 2 too well, and if the job isn’t diffi cult enough, a lack of funding and support for the conservation of land supporting imperiled plant communities makes it harder. Bok Tower Gardens Rare Plant Conservation Program is one of 39 botanical institutions throughout the United States that collaborate with the Center for Plant Conservation (CPC) to prevent the extinction of native plants in the United States. Created in 1984, CPC institutions house over 750 living specimens of the nation’s most endangered native plants, the largest living collection of rare plants in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Native Shrubs
    NATIVE SHRUBS FOR HOME LANDSCAPING IN NORTHWEST FLORIDA Jody Wood-Putnam, Bay County Master Gardener Julie McConnell, Horticultural Agent UF/IFAS Extension Bay County Why Use Native Plants? • Adapted to our environment: climate (temperatures, rainfall, humidity, etc.) and soils (often very sandy, mostly acidic) • May require less maintenance: • Less watering • Less fertilizing • No need for soil amendment • Food and habitat for native wildlife • Diversity of native plants leads to diversity of native wildlife Evergreen Shrubs Pipestem, Fetterbush, Florida Leucothoe Agarista populifolia • Height: 8 - 12 feet • Spread: 5 - 10 feet • Evergreen, multi-stemmed arching foliage • Acidic soils • Well drained to wet • Shade to partial shade • Fragrant white flowers in spring • Can be pruned to form hedge Groundselbush (Baccharis halimifolia) • Height: 8 to 12 ft • Spread: 6 to 12 ft • Full sun • Variable soils • Semi-evergreen • Whitish flowers followed by fluffy white seed clusters • Attractive to butterflies • Salt tolerant False-rosemary, Scrub Mint (Conradina canescens) • Height:2-4 feet • Spread 2-4 feet • Evergreen perennial • Full Sun • Dry sandy soil • Drought tolerant • Profusely blooming aromatic, lavender flowers • Visited by butterflies and hummingbirds Golden-Dewdrop, Skyflower Duranta repens • Height: 18 feet • Spread: 18 feet • Borderline cold hardy in Bay County; evergreen in mild winters, die-back in hard freeze • Average soil • Regular moisture • Sun to part shade • Blue or white flowers in spring • Yellow berries in summer through fall • Attractive to butterflies and hummingbirds • May have spines • Berries are poisonous to humans • Use as specimen or in borders Firebush (Hamelia patens) • Evergreen shrub or small tree • Borderline cold hardy in Bay county; plant in protected area • Height: up to 20 feet • Part shade to sun • Reddish-orange flowers • Evergreen red-tinged foliage • Heat/drought tolerant • Attractive to butterflies and hummingbirds St John’s Wort, St Andrew’s Cross, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist
    I -1 Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist Volusia County, Florida I, I Aceraceae (Maple) Asteraceae (Aster) Red Maple Acer rubrum • Bitterweed Helenium amarum • Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum Agavaceae (Yucca) Blazing Star Liatris sp. B Adam's Needle Yucca filamentosa Blazing Star Liatris tenuifolia BNolina Nolina brittoniana Camphorweed Heterotheca subaxillaris Spanish Bayonet Yucca aloifolia § Cudweed Gnaphalium falcatum • Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Amaranthaceae (Amaranth) Dwarf Horseweed Conyza candensis B Cottonweed Froelichia floridana False Dandelion Pyrrhopappus carolinianus • Fireweed Erechtites hieracifolia B Anacardiaceae (Cashew) Garberia Garberia heterophylla Winged Sumac Rhus copallina Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia • § Goldenrod Solidago chapmanii Annonaceae (Custard Apple) Goldenrod Solidago fistulosa Flag Paw paw Asimina obovata Goldenrod Solidago spp. B • Mohr's Throughwort Eupatorium mohrii Apiaceae (Celery) BRa gweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia • Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia BSpanish Needles Bidens alba Apocynaceae (Dogbane) Wild Lettuce Lactuca graminifolia Periwinkle Catharathus roseus • • Brassicaceae (Mustard) Aquifoliaceae (Holly) Poorman's Pepper Lepidium virginicum Gallberry Ilex glabra • Sand Holly Ilex ambigua Bromeliaceae (Airplant) § Scrub Holly Ilex opaca var. arenicola Ball Moss Tillandsia recurvata • Spanish Moss Tillandsia usneoides Arecaceae (Palm) • Saw Palmetto Serenoa repens Cactaceae (Cactus) BScrub Palmetto Sabal etonia • Prickly Pear Opuntia humifusa Asclepiadaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14. Wildlife and Forest Communities 341
    chapteR 14. Wildlife and Forest Communities 341 Chapter 14. Wildlife and Forest communities Margaret Trani Griep and Beverly Collins1 key FindingS • Hotspot areas for plants of concern are Big Bend National Park; the Apalachicola area of the Southern Gulf Coast; • The South has 1,076 native terrestrial vertebrates: 179 Lake Wales Ridge and the area south of Lake Okeechobee amphibians, 525 birds, 176 mammals, and 196 reptiles. in Peninsular Florida; and coastal counties of North Species richness is highest in the Mid-South (856) and Carolina in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. The Appalachian- Coastal Plain (733), reflecting both the large area of these Cumberland highlands also contain plants identified by subregions and the diversity of habitats within them. States as species of concern. • The geography of species richness varies by taxa. • Species, including those of conservation concern, are Amphibians flourish in portions of the Piedmont and imperiled by habitat alteration, isolation, introduction of Appalachian-Cumberland highlands and across the Coastal invasive species, environmental pollutants, commercial Plain. Bird richness is highest along the coastal wetlands of development, human disturbance, and exploitation. the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico, mammal richness Conditions predicted by the forecasts will magnify these is highest in the Mid-South and Appalachian-Cumberland stressors. Each species varies in its vulnerability to highlands, and reptile richness is highest across the forecasted threats, and these threats vary by subregion. Key southern portion of the region. areas of concern arise where hotspots of vulnerable species • The South has 142 terrestrial vertebrate species coincide with forecasted stressors. considered to be of conservation concern (e.g., global • There are 614 species that are presumed extirpated from conservation status rank of critically imperiled, imperiled, selected States in the South; 64 are terrestrial vertebrates or vulnerable), 77 of which are listed as threatened or and 550 are vascular plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives to Invasive-Exotic Plants
    Lake County, Florida GREENER CHOICES Alternatives to invasive-exotic plants An educational pamphlet of the Lake County Department of Public Resources and the Cooperative Invasive Species Management Area (CISMA) of Lake County 1 CALL to ACTION Lake County is under attack and needs your help in preserving its unique environment. Invasive exotic plants threaten to crowd out native species Table of Contents and disrupt Lake County’s distinctive ecosystem processes. • Call to action. .1 According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation • What you can do to help . 2 Commission (FWC), while some non-natives, such as • Plant Care and Wildlife Benefits . 3 tomato plants, behave nicely and put food on our tables, others, without conditions that control them on their home • Plants . 4 turf, become invasive — growing and spreading rapidly Æ Trees . 4 and aggressively. More than 1.5 million acres of Florida’s Blooming . 4 remaining natural areas have become infested Shade . 6 and overwhelmed with non-native plant species. Fall Color . 7 Invasive plants, such as the Old World climbing fern and Æ Shrubs . 8 Brazilian pepper, cost Floridians millions of dollars annually. Æ Vines . 10 Farmers, ranchers, and golf course owners spend more Æ Groundcovers . 12 than $30 million each year to eradicate exotic weeds. Æ Grasses . 13 The economic costs pale in comparison to the Æ Tropical Plants . 14 ecological ones. Invasive exotic species are often cited as the number two threat to global biodiversity, Æ Wetlands. 16 second only to habitat loss due to land conversion. 2 3 What YOU CAN do to HELP The first step to control the spread of exotic plants (marked with “ ”) is to avoid using them.
    [Show full text]
  • False Rosemary
    False rosemary may die suddenly; remove these to encourage new 2–3 ft growth. C. grandiflora will tolerate some Nectar overhead or drip irrigation. Other Conradina species should be watered only during extended dry periods. Because this plant thrives naturally in dry ecosystems, overwatering may cause rot and decline. Photo by Andrea England Photo by Photo by Ron and Diane Bynum Site conditions Conradina canescens Conradina grandiflora with needlelike leaves Conradina is ideal for dry, sandy soils in full sun. It will thrive on natural rainfall. If Plants in the Conradina or False rosemary Planting your landscape is irrigated on a regular genus may look like their namesake basis, look for a spot that remains dry. cousin, whose leaves are used as a Conradina can last three or more years in landscapes. Plant in sandy, well- savory cooking spice, but these members Hardiness zones of the Lamiaceae (mint) family emit a drained soil, and water until established. minty-fresh smell when their leaves are Conradina releases a chemical that Conradina grandiflora is suited for zone 9. suppresses the growth of other crushed. There are six Conradina species C. canescens is best for 8A–9B. vegetation, including weeds, and thus found in Florida; only one, Conradina may be beneficial, but also may restrict canescens, is not considered endangered or threatened. growth of other plants close by. The plants are evergreen and reward Seeds gardeners with a display of fragrant white-lavender blooms. Seeds are not commercially available, but may be collected from plants when fresh. Sow in spring in well-drained soil and Description keep moist until germination occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Vascular Plant Taxa Associated with the Longleaf Pine Ecosystems: Patterns in Taxonomy and Ecology
    Rare Vascular Plant Taxa Associated with the Longleaf Pine Ecosystems: Patterns in Taxonomy and Ecology Joan Walker U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Department of Forest Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 ABSTRACT Ecological, taxonomic and biogeographical characteristics are used to describe the group of 187 rare vascular plant taxa associated with longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) throughout its range. Taxonomic and growth form distributions mirror the patterns of common plus rare taxa in the flora. Most of the species have rather narrow habitat preferences, and narrow geo­ graphic ranges, but a few rare sp~cies with broad habitat tolerances and wider geographic ranges are identified. Ninety-six local endemics are associated with longleaf pine ecosystems. This incidence is as high as in other comparably-sized endemic-rich areas in North America. A distinct geographic trend in rare species composition is indicated. Species fall into 4 groups: Florida longleaf associates, south Atlantic coastal plain, east Gulf coastal plain, and west Gulf coastal plain species. Distributional factors that produce rarity must be considered in the development of conser­ vation strategies. Overall, conserving longleaf communities rangewide will protect .large ~ numbers of rare plant taxa in Southeastern United States. INTRODUCTION 1986), and inevitably the strategies required to con­ serve them will differ. Recently Hardin and White (1989) effectively focused conservationists' attentions on the high The purposes of this study are to (1) identify numbers of rare species associated with wiregrass the rare species associated with longleaf pine eco­ (Aristida stricta), a grass that dominates the ground systems rangewide; (2) characterize the rare spe­ layer of longleaf communities through a large part cies taxonomically and ecologically, in order to of its range, and over a broad range of longleaf identify patterns that may distinguish this group habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Conradina Glabra (Apalachicola Rosemary)
    Conradina glabra (Apalachicola rosemary) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Torreya State Park, Florida. Photos by Vivian Negron-Ortiz U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Panama City Field Office Panama City, Florida 5-YEAR REVIEW Conradina glabra (Apalachicola rosemary) I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Methodology used to complete the review This review was accomplished using information obtained from the plant’s 1994 recovery plan, unpublished field survey results, reports of current research projects, peer reviewed scientific publications, unpublished field observations by Service, State and other experienced biologists, and personal communications. These documents are on file at the Panama City Field Office. A Federal Register notice announcing the review and requesting information was published on April 16, 2008 (73 FR 20702). No part of this review was contracted to an outside party. Comments and suggestions from peer reviewers were incorporated as appropriate (see Appendix A). This review was completed by the Service’s lead Recovery botanist in the Panama City Field Office, Florida. B. Reviewers Lead Field Office: Dr. Vivian Negrón-Ortiz, Panama City Field Office, 850-769-0552 ext. 231 Lead Region: Southeast Region: Kelly Bibb, 404-679-7132 Peer reviewers: Ms. Tova Spector, Environmental Specialist II, Florida Park Service, Department of Environmental Protection, 4620 State Park Lane, Panama City, Florida 32408 Dr. Christine Edwards, Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of Wyoming, Department of Botany, 3165, 1000 E. University Avenue, Laramie, Wyoming 82071 Dr. Alice A. Winn, Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306 C. Background 1. FR Notice citation announcing initiation of this review: 73 FR 20702 (April 16, 2008).
    [Show full text]