DOCSLIB.ORG

5 Chapter 5: Sustainable Development, Poverty Eradication 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5 Chapter 5: Sustainable Development, Poverty Eradication 1 First Order Draft Chapter 5 IPCC SR1.5 1 5 Chapter 5: Sustainable Development, Poverty Eradication 2 and Reducing Inequalities 3 4 Coordinating Lead Authors: Joyashree Roy (India), Petra Tschakert (Australia) 5 6 Lead Authors: Sharina Abdul Halim (Malaysia), Purnamita Dasgupta (India), Bronwyn Hayward (New 7 Zealand), Markku Kanninen (Finland), Sari Kovats (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), 8 Diana Liverman (United States of America), Patricia Fernanda Pinho (Brazil), Keywan Riahi (Austria), 9 Avelino G. Suarez Rodriguez (Cuba), Penny Urquhart (South Africa), Henri Waisman (France) 10 11 Contributing Authors: Philip Antwi-Agyei (Ghana), Mook Bangalore (United States of America), Maria 12 Figueroa (Venezuela/Denmark), Mukesh Gupta (India), Karen Paiva Henrique (Brazil), Daniel Huppmann 13 (Austria), Chukwumerije Okereke (Nigeria/United Kingdom), Simon Parkinson (Canada), Diana Hinge 14 Salili (Fiji/Vanuatu) 15 16 Review Editors: Svitlana Krakovska (Ukraine), Ramon Pichs Madruga (Cuba), Roberto Sanchez (Mexico) 17 18 Chapter Scientist: Neville Ellis (Australia) 19 20 Date of First-Order Draft: 23 July 2017 21 Do Not Cite, Quote or Distribute 5-1 Total pages: 92 First Order Draft Chapter 5 IPCC SR1.5 1 2 Table of Contents 3 4 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................5 6 7 8 5.1 Scope and Delineations ......................................................................................................................7 9 5.1.1 Sustainable Development, Poverty, Equality, and Equity: Core Concepts and Trends ..... 7 10 5.1.2 Sustainable Development Goals ........................................................................................ 8 11 Box 5.1: The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) ...............................................................................9 12 5.1.3 Climate-Resilient Development Pathways ........................................................................ 9 13 5.1.4 Chapter Structure and Types of Evidence ....................................................................... 10 14 15 16 5.2 Poverty, Equality, and Equity Implications of a 1.5°C Warmer World ...................................... 11 17 5.2.1 Future Impacts and Risks at Sub-regional to Sub-national Levels ................................... 11 18 5.2.2 Risks of a 1.5°C Warmer World ....................................................................................... 11 19 5.2.3 Avoided Impacts of 1.5°C versus 2°C Warming ............................................................... 12 20 5.2.4 Implications of Differential and Avoided Risks from 1.5°C Global Warming for Achieving 21 the SDGs ......................................................................................................................................... 13 22 23 24 5.3 Impacts of Adaptation on Sustainable Development .................................................................... 14 25 5.3.1 Synergies between Adaptation Response Options and Sustainable Development ........ 14 26 5.3.2 Trade-offs between Adaptation Response Options and Sustainable Development ....... 15 27 5.3.3 Sustainable Development Implications of Adaptation Pathways in a 1.5°C Warmer 28 World 16 29 30 31 5.4 Impacts of Mitigation on Sustainable Development ..................................................................... 17 32 5.4.1 Synergies between Mitigation Options and Sustainable Development .......................... 18 33 5.4.1.1 Accelerating efficiency in resource use .................................................................... 18 34 5.4.1.2 Behavioural options.................................................................................................. 18 35 5.4.1.3 Access to modern and reliable energy and fuel switch ........................................... 18 36 5.4.1.4 Cross-sector policy measures ................................................................................... 19 37 5.4.1.5 Land-based agriculture and forestry sector mitigation options .............................. 20 38 5.4.2 Trade-offs between Mitigation Options and Sustainable Development ........................ 20 Do Not Cite, Quote or Distribute 5-2 Total pages: 92 First Order Draft Chapter 5 IPCC SR1.5 1 5.4.2.1 Accelerating efficiency in resource use .................................................................... 20 2 5.4.2.2 Access to modern and reliable energy and fuel switch ........................................... 20 3 5.4.2.3 Cross-sector policy measures ................................................................................... 21 4 5.4.2.4 Land based agriculture and forestry sector mitigation options ............................... 21 5 5.4.2.5 Temporal and spatial trade-offs and distributional impacts.................................... 22 6 5.4.3 Sustainable Development Implications of 1.5°C and 2°C Mitigation Pathways .............. 22 7 5.4.3.1 Air pollution and health............................................................................................ 23 8 5.4.3.2 Food security and hunger ......................................................................................... 23 9 5.4.3.3 Lack of energy access / energy poverty ................................................................... 23 10 5.4.3.4 Water security (energy-related) ............................................................................... 24 11 5.4.3.5 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................... 24 12 13 14 5.5 Development First: Implications for Reductions of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Climate 15 Vulnerabilities and Adaptive Capacities .................................................................................................... 26 16 5.5.1 Pursuing Development and Reaching Ambitious Emission Reductions .......................... 26 17 5.5.1.1 Sustainable development as a facilitator of mitigation ........................................... 26 18 5.5.1.2 Conditional synergies between sustainable development and emission reductions 19 27 20 5.5.2 Pursuing Sustainable Development, Reducing Vulnerabilities, and Enhancing Adaptive 21 Capacities........................................................................................................................................ 29 22 5.5.2.1 Sustainable development for transformative adaptation ....................................... 29 23 24 25 5.6 Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable Development Integration: Opportunities and 26 Challenges 31 27 5.6.1 Integrated Approaches toward Climate and Development ............................................ 31 28 5.6.2 Achieving Triple-win Outcomes ....................................................................................... 32 29 5.6.2.1 Enabling conditions and challenges ......................................................................... 32 30 5.6.2.2 Distributional and dynamic dimensions of enabling conditions and constraints .... 33 31 5.6.3 Governance to Strengthen Synergies for Transformation .............................................. 34 32 33 34 5.7 Climate-Resilient Development Pathways ..................................................................................... 35 35 5.7.1 Climate-resilient Development Pathways, Wellbeing, and Equity .................................. 35 36 5.7.2 Enabling Conditions for Climate-Resilient Development Pathways ................................ 36 Do Not Cite, Quote or Distribute 5-3 Total pages: 92 First Order Draft Chapter 5 IPCC SR1.5 1 5.7.2.1 Social enabling conditions ........................................................................................ 37 2 5.7.2.2 Governance and policy foundations ........................................................................ 38 3 5.7.3 Evidence of Climate-Resilience Development Pathways: From Nation States to 4 Communities .................................................................................................................................. 39 5 5.7.3.1 Green economy pathways, green states, and implications for sustainable 6 development ............................................................................................................................... 39 7 Box 5.2: Successes and challenges of CRDPs in state-driven green economies ........................................ 40 8 5.7.3.2 Climate-resilient development planning through state-NGO-community alliances41 9 Box 5.3: The Republic of Vanuatu– Enabling Resilient Communities ...................................................... 41 10 5.7.3.3 Alternative and bottom-up development paths ...................................................... 42 11 Box 5.4: CRDPs - Transnational Movements and Community Action ..................................................... 42 12 5.7.4 Lessons from Case Studies on Climate-resilient Development Pathways ...................... 43 13 5.7.4.1 Social learning .......................................................................................................... 44 14 5.7.4.2 Equity, rights, and justice ......................................................................................... 44 15 5.7.4.3 Indicators, monitoring, and evaluation .................................................................... 44 16 17 18 5.8 Synthesis and Research Gaps ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clag/Lasg Newsletter
    NOVEMBER 2014 !1 NUMBER 124 NEW PUBLICATIONS MEMBER NEWS MEMBERS PAGE 5 PAGE 8 PAGE 20 CLAG/LASG NEWSLETTER Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers (CLAG) and AAG Latin America Specialty Group (LASG) Newsletter Dr. Catherine Nolin & Alexandra Pedersen, Co-Editors CLAG Correspondence: New Email: [email protected] Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Conference-of-Latin-Americanist-Geographers-CLAG/195858177122376 Twitter: @CLAGGeography – when tweeting any relevant news to CLAG, please use hashtag #CLAGScholar and #LASG Scholar Visas Needed Prior to Travel to Brazil Citizens of the United States of America and Canada are required to obtain a visa from a Brazilian consulate prior to travel to Brazil. Registration for CLAG Fortaleza 2015 will take place much earlier than usual before the meeting so that individuals attending the meeting will have enough time to obtain a tourist visa. A quick Internet search will show the appropriate Brazilian consulate where you may submit your visa application. Please plan ahead and carefully follow the instructions so that you will be able to obtain your visa and attend CLAG Fortaleza 2015. Citizens of other countries should check with local Brazilian consulates for visa requirements prior to travel. CLAG CONFERENCE 2015 - May 26-30, Fortaleza, Brazil Keep your eyes open for upcoming details on the CLAG Conference! For more information please see the CLAG website here and watch for email updates! See you in Brazil! NOVEMBER 2014 !2 NUMBER 124 Letter from CLAG Chair, Karl Offen Dear CLAGistas, It has been a busy time here at CLAG central! The last 6 months have seen a lot of nominations, voting, and the appointment of new people in key positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Crafting Climate Justice in Our Communities and Our World
    Crafting Climate Justice in Our Communities and Our World Syllabus Spring 2021 Feb 3 2021-Mar 3 2021 Wednesdays 5.30pm-7pm Online Diana Liverman, School of Geography, Development and Environment How can we understand and solve the challenges of climate change in ways that acknowledge the unequal responsibilities for climate change, the uneven impacts of climate change on different places and people, and the need to develop responses and solutions that reduce the risks of climate change for everyone without undermining other goals of sustainable development? In this five-week course we will consider the origins of calls for climate justice from researchers, poor and vulnerable countries, women and youth, communities of color, and policy makers. We will discuss the debates within and between researchers, activists, communities and countries about who is most responsible for climate change, who is most vulnerable to it, and who should respond and how. The course will include a mix of lectures (some recorded for background viewing), readings, discussions, and live interviews with some leading scholars and local activists. Diana Liverman is a geographer who studies and teaches about the human dimensions of global environmental change, especially the social causes, consequences and responses to climate change. Recently elected to the US National Academy of Sciences, she has been a lead author for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and has served on advisory groups to the US government, the United Nations, and business, environmental and cultural organizations. Professor Liverman directs the School of Geography, Development & Environment at the University of Arizona where she holds a faculty appointment as Regents Professor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Asilomar Conference Recommendations on Principles for Research Into Climate Engineering Techniques
    The Asilomar Conference Recommendations on Principles for Research into Climate Engineering Techniques Conference Report Prepared by the Asilomar Scientific Organizing Committee November 2010 Climate Institute Washington DC 1 1 The Asilomar Conference Recommendations on Principles for Research into Climate Engineering Techniques: Conference Report November 2010 Prepared by the Asilomar Scientific Organizing Committee* Michael MacCracken, Chair Scott Barrett Roger Barry Paul Crutzen Steven Hamburg Richard Lampitt Diana Liverman Thomas Lovejoy Gordon McBean Edward Parson Stephen Seidel John Shepherd Richard Somerville Tom M. L. Wigley Organized by the Climate Institute 900 17th Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington DC www.climate.org * See appendix A for member affiliations. 1 Abstract Despite ongoing efforts to reduce emissions and adapt to the changing climate, global greenhouse gas emissions are far above what is required to reverse the increasing changes in atmospheric composition. In response to growing calls for research to explore the potential for climate engineering to provide additional options for responding, the Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies was held at the Asilomar Conference Center in California from March 22 to 26, 2010. The conference attracted a diverse group of experts from fifteen countries on six continents. Presentations and discussions covered the two major categories of climate engineering: (a) remediation technologies, such as afforestation, carbon removal, and ocean fertilization, that attempt to reduce the causes of climate change, and so represent an extension of mitigation, and (b) intervention technologies, such as solar radiation management, that attempt to moderate the results of having altered atmospheric composition, and so represent an extension of adaptation to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity
    Copyright © 2009 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F. S. Chapin, III, E. Lambin, T. M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C. A. De Wit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, P. K. Snyder, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, L. Karlberg, R. W. Corell, V. J. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, and J. Foley. 2009. Planetary boundaries:exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2): 32. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/ Research Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity Johan Rockström 1,2, Will Steffen 1,3, Kevin Noone 1,4, Åsa Persson 1,2, F. Stuart III Chapin 5, Eric Lambin 6, Timothy M. Lenton 7, Marten Scheffer 8, Carl Folke 1,9, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber 10,11, Björn Nykvist 1,2, Cynthia A. de Wit 4, Terry Hughes 12, Sander van der Leeuw 13, Henning Rodhe 14, Sverker Sörlin 1,15, Peter K. Snyder 16, Robert Costanza 1,17, Uno Svedin 1, Malin Falkenmark 1,18, Louise Karlberg 1,2, Robert W. Corell 19, Victoria J. Fabry 20, James Hansen 21, Brian Walker 1,22, Diana Liverman 23,24, Katherine Richardson 25, Paul Crutzen 26, and Jonathan Foley 27 ABSTRACT. Anthropogenic pressures on the Earth System have reached a scale where abrupt global environmental change can no longer be excluded. We propose a new approach to global sustainability in which we define planetary boundaries within which we expect that humanity can operate safely.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development, Poverty Eradication and Reducing
    Sustainable Development, Poverty Eradication and Reducing Inequalities 5 Coordinating Lead Authors: Joyashree Roy (India), Petra Tschakert (Australia/Austria), Henri Waisman (France) Lead Authors: Sharina Abdul Halim (Malaysia), Philip Antwi-Agyei (Ghana), Purnamita Dasgupta (India), Bronwyn Hayward (New Zealand), Markku Kanninen (Finland), Diana Liverman (USA), Chukwumerije Okereke (UK/Nigeria), Patricia Fernanda Pinho (Brazil), Keywan Riahi (Austria), Avelino G. Suarez Rodriguez (Cuba) Contributing Authors: Fernando Aragón-Durand (Mexico), Mustapha Babiker (Sudan), Mook Bangalore (USA), Paolo Bertoldi (Italy), Bishwa Bhaskar Choudhary (India), Edward Byres (Austria/Brazil), Anton Cartwright (South Africa), Riyanti Djalante (Japan/Indonesia), Kristie L. Ebi (USA), Neville Ellis (Australia), Francois Engelbrecht (South Africa), Maria Figueroa (Denmark/Venezuela), Mukesh Gupta (India), Diana Hinge Salili (Vanuatu), Daniel Huppmann (Austria), Saleemul Huq (Bangladesh/UK), Daniela Jacob (Germany), Rachel James (UK), Debora Ley (Guatemala/Mexico), Peter Marcotullio (USA), Omar Massera (Mexico), Reinhard Mechler (Germany), Haileselassie Amaha Medhin (Ethiopia), Shagun Mehrotra (USA/India), Peter Newman (Australia), Karen Paiva Henrique (Brazil), Simon Parkinson (Canada), Aromar Revi (India), Wilfried Rickels (Germany), Lisa Schipper (UK/Sweden), Jörn Schmidt (Germany), Seth Schultz (USA), Pete Smith (UK), William Solecki (USA), Shreya Some (India), Nenenteiti Teariki-Ruatu (Kiribati), Adelle Thomas (Bahamas), Penny Urquhart (South Africa), Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh (Netherlands) Review Editors: Svitlana Krakovska (Ukraine), Ramon Pichs Madruga (Cuba), Roberto Sanchez (Mexico) Chapter Scientist: Neville Ellis (Australia) This chapter should be cited as: Roy, J., P. Tschakert, H. Waisman, S. Abdul Halim, P. Antwi-Agyei, P. Dasgupta, B. Hayward, M. Kanninen, D. Liverman, C. Okereke, P.F. Pinho, K. Riahi, and A.G. Suarez Rodriguez, 2018: Sustainable Development, Poverty Eradication and Reducing Inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • DIANA M. LIVERMAN Current Position Regents Professor of Geography and Development, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
    DIANA M. LIVERMAN Current position Regents Professor of Geography and Development, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA Senior Research Fellow, Environmental Change Institute; and supernumerary research fellow, Linacre College, Oxford University Contact information School of Geography and Development ENR2 Building, 1064 E. Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85721 [PO Box 210137] Email: [email protected] Mobile/Cell: 520 388 0190 Website: https://dianaliverman.wordpress.com Brief Summary of Research Interests My research focuses on environmental change and policy, especially on the causes, consequences, and responses to climate change and the links between environment, sustainable development, and food security. I have longstanding interests in climate vulnerability and adaptation; climate information provision and climate policy; international environmental policy; political ecology; and the interaction of global environmental change with food security. I take a geographical perspective on environmental change and its human dimensions in that I analyze the natural and social, institutional and behavioral, causes and consequences, of environmental issues, with particular attention to how change and impacts vary across space and within society. My regional interest is the Americas, especially Mexico. I have advocated in writing and on national and international committees for the value of interdisciplinary and international research collaborations, for the significance of social sciences in global change research, and for scientists to be more responsive to stakeholders, social justice, and users of the knowledge we produce. Education Ph.D. Geography, 1984, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), USA Dissertation: The use of a simulation model in assessing the impacts of climate on the world food system. Advisors: Werner Terjung and Stephen Schneider.
    [Show full text]
  • William Scott Prudham
    University of Toronto (WILLIAM) SCOTT PRUDHAM CURRICULUM VITAE Date of Revision: 4 May 2011 A. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION 1. PERSONAL William Scott Prudham Office: Department of Geography Programme in Planning and the Centre for Environment University of Toronto St. George Campus #5007, Sidney Smith Hall 100 St. George Street Toronto, ON. M5S 3G3 Phone: 416.978.4975 Fax: 416.946.3886 email: [email protected] 2. DEGREES Ph.D. 1999 Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley “Knock on Wood: Nature and the Fictitious Commodity in Oregon‟s Douglas-fir Industry” Thesis Supervisors: Dr. Rachel Schurman, Dr. Richard Walker M.A. 1992 Department of Geography, University of Victoria “Toward a Regional Natural Resource Accounting Framework” Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Lonergan 3. EMPLOYMENT Current: Associate Professor Department of Geography, Programme in Planning, and Centre for Environment University of Toronto Past: James Martin Visiting Fellow Environmental Change Institute Oxford University Centre for the Environment October-December 2006 Assistant Professor Department of Geography, Programme in Planning, and the Institute for Environmental Studies University of Toronto July 2000-June 2005 Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, September 1999-July 2000 4. HONOURS Recipient, 2010 Ashby Prize awarded to the most innovative papers published in Environment and Planning A during the previous year for “Pimping climate: a critique of Richard Branson‟s entrepreneurial activism”, Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Public Enemy No. 1? Understanding Media Representations of Outlier
    ABS47684ABS57610.1177/0002764213476846American Behavioral ScientistBoykoff 6© 2011 SAGE Publications Reprints and permission: http://www. sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Article American Behavioral Scientist 57(6) 796 –817 Public Enemy No. 1? © 2013 SAGE Publications Reprints and permissions: Understanding Media sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0002764213476846 Representations of Outlier abs.sagepub.com Views on Climate Change Maxwell T. Boykoff1 Abstract Outlier voices—particularly those views often dubbed climate “skeptics,” “denialists,” or “contrarians”—have gained prominence and traction in mass media over time through a mix of internal workings such as journalistic norms, institutional values and practices, and external political economic, cultural, and social factors. In this context, the article explores how and why these actors—through varied interventions and actions—garner disproportionate visibility in the public arena via mass media. It also examines how media content producers grapple with ways to represent claims makers, as well as their claims, so that they clarify rather than confuse these critical issues. To the extent that mass media misrepresent and/or gratuitously cover these outlier views, they contribute to ongoing illusory, misleading, and counterproductive debates within the public and policy communities, and poorly serve the collective public. Furthermore, working through mass media outlets, these outlier interventions demonstrate themselves to be (at times deliberately) detrimental to efforts seeking to enlarge rather than constrict the spectrum of possibility for varied forms of climate action. Keywords media, climate change, outliers, contrarians, skeptics, deniers, cultural politics 1University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA Corresponding Author: Maxwell T. Boykoff, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, Environmental Studies and Geography, University of Colorado, UCB 488, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Written Testimony of Diana M Liverman Regents Professor of Geography and Development University of Arizona Hearing on “Solvi
    Written Testimony of Diana M Liverman Regents Professor of Geography and Development University of Arizona Hearing on “Solving the Climate Crisis: Drawing Down Carbon and Building Up the American Economy” United States House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis April 30th 2019 Good morning. Chairwoman Castor, Ranking Member Graves, and members of the committee, thank you for the invitation to testify at today’s hearing. My name is Diana Liverman and I am a Regents Professor of Geography and Development at the University of Arizona. I have studied climate for 4 decades beginning with my graduate work on climate change and food security at UCLA and the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, and in faculty positions at the University of Wisconsin, Penn State, Oxford University, and the University of Arizona. I am an expert on the impacts of climate on society and on climate adaptation. Although I have been a US citizen for decades, I have retained my British accent because my students tell me it helps them pay more attention in lectures. When 40 years ago, as a student, I first heard that human activities were increasing greenhouse 1 gases, CO2 was around 335ppm, 25% above a baseline prior to the Industrial Revolution . I learned that if we continued to emit CO2 and doubled concentrations, global temperatures could warm more than 3°C. My graduate work at UCLA showed that this could have serious impacts on food security and on crop yields in the US and across the world. Since then, the rise in CO2 has continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography and the Anthropocene II: Current Contributions Noel Castree University of Wollongong, [email protected]
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers Faculty of Social Sciences 2014 Geography and the Anthropocene II: Current contributions Noel Castree University of Wollongong, [email protected] Publication Details Castree, N. (2014). Geography and the Anthropocene II: Current contributions. Geography Compass, 8 (7), 450-463. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Geography and the Anthropocene II: Current contributions Abstract This and two companion papers (The Anthropocene and Geography I: The ab ck story and The Anthropocene and Geography III: Future Directions) consider the relevance of 'the Anthropocene' to present and future research in Geography. Along with the concept of 'planetary boundaries', the idea that humanity has entered a new geological epoch of its own making is currently attracting considerable attention - both within and beyond the world of Earth surface science from whence both notions originate. This paper's predecessor detailed the invention and evolution of the two scientific neologisms, ending with a general discussion of their potential relevance to Geography. The present essay examines how that relevance is being actualised in practice. Though the Anthropocene and planetary boundaries concepts are the progeny of certain biophysical scientists, some human geographers are already going beyond the science to explore their socio-ecological implications. Accordingly, the paper describes how various physical, environmental and human geographers have thus far examined the (supposed) end of the Holocene. By detailing the full range of geographers' discussions of the two ideas, it comprehensively maps intellectual territory that a (so-far select) group of geographers have been exploring independently of each other, albeit layered on previous research into global environmental change.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity Johan Rockström Stockholm University
    Portland State University PDXScholar Institute for Sustainable Solutions Publications Institute for Sustainable Solutions 1-1-2009 Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity Johan Rockström Stockholm University W. L. Steffen Stockholm University Kevin Noone Stockholm University Åsa Persson Stockholm University F. Stuart Chapin III University of Alaska Fairbanks See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/iss_pub Part of the Sustainability Commons Recommended Citation Rockstrom, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, A. Persson, F. S. Chapin, III, E. Lambin, T. M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C. A. De Wit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sorlin, P. K. Snyder, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, L. Karlberg, R. W. Corell, V. J. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, and J. Foley. 2009. Planetary boundaries:exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2): 32. [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for Sustainable Solutions Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Johan Rockström, W. L. Steffen, Kevin Noone, Åsa Persson, F. Stuart Chapin III, Eric Lambin, Timothy M. Lenton, Marten Scheffer, Carl Folke, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Björn Nykvist, Cynthia A. de Wit, Terry Hughes, Sander van der Leeuw, Henning Rodhe, Sverker Sörlin, Peter K. Snyder, Robert Costanza, Uno Svedin, Malin Falkenmark, Louise Karlberg, Robert W.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographers and the Discourse of an Earth Transformed
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers Faculty of Social Sciences 2015 Geographers and the discourse of an earth transformed: influencing the intellectual weather or changing the intellectual climate? Noel Castree University of Wollongong, [email protected] Publication Details Castree, N. (2015). Geographers and the discourse of an earth transformed: influencing the intellectual weather or changing the intellectual climate?. Geographical Research, 53 (3), 244-254. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Geographers and the discourse of an earth transformed: influencing the intellectual weather or changing the intellectual climate? Abstract This article considers how geographers might choose to respond to many geoscientists' claims that we are entering 'the age of humans'. These claims, expressed in the concepts of the Anthropocene, planetary boundaries and global tipping points, make epochal claims about Earth surface change that are also far- reaching claims upon Earth's current inhabitants. The cales and scope of their normative implications are extraordinarily grand. After describing the content and wider context for these claims, the history of some geographers' engagement with global change research is sketched and their current contributions described. Wider alterations in the modus operandi of global change scientists seem to offer a perfect opportunity for geographers to demonstrate the intellectual and societal value of their discipline's 'integrative' aspirations. However, the article suggests that this opportunity is likely to be used in a rather conservative way that downplays the sort of wide, deep and plural forms of integrative analysis that a post-Holocene world surely calls for.
    [Show full text]