Complete Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Complete Report FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 2001, 4:00 P.M. It’s the Economy Again! CLINTON NOSTALGIA SETS IN, BUSH REACTION MIXED Also Inside ... w Hillary's Favorability Rises. w Winners and Losers under Bush. w Powell a Visible Choice. w Clinton's Issue Report Card. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut, Director Carroll Doherty, Editor Kimberly Parker, Research Director Michael Dimock, Survey Director Nilanthi Samaranayake, Project Director Pew Research Center for The People & The Press 202/293-3126 http://www.people-press.org It’s the Economy Again! CLINTON NOSTALGIA SETS IN, BUSH REACTION MIXED As the country awaits the formal transfer of presidential power, Bill Clinton has never looked better to the American public, while his successor George W. Bush is receiving initial reviews that are more mixed, though still positive. The president leaves office with 61% of the public approving of the way he is handling the job, combined with a surprisingly lofty 64% favorability rating (up from 48% in May 2000). The favorability rating, a mixture of personal and performance evaluations, is all the more impressive because such judgments have never been Clinton’s strong suit. Unlike other recent presidents, Clinton’s ratings have often run below his job approval scores. As historians and scholars render their judgments of Clinton’s legacy, the public is Improved Opinion of the Clintons ... weighing in with a nuanced verdict. By a 60%- Aug May Jan 27% margin, people feel that, in the long run, 1998 2000 2001 Clinton’s accomplishments in office will Bill Clinton ... %%% Favorable 54 48 64 outweigh his failures, even though 67% think he Unfavorable 44 47 34 will be remembered for impeachment and the Don't know 2 5 2 100 100 100 scandals, not for what he achieved. At the same Hillary Clinton ... time, evaluations of Hillary Clinton are on the Favorable 63 49 60 Unfavorable 34 42 35 upswing as she leaves the White House to Don't know 3 9 5 become New York’s junior senator. 100 100 100 ... And Mixed Reviews for Bush Opinions of President-elect Bush are notably less effusive, which may be at least Bush Sr. Clinton Bush Jr. Explanation of 1989 1993 2001 partly attributable to the election’s contentious his policies ... %%% conclusion. A 50% plurality approves of the job Approve 65 62 50 Disapprove 28 24 36 he has done in explaining his policies and plans Don't know 7 14 14 for the future. This contrasts to 62% who 100 100 100 1989 and 1993 figures are from Gallup. expressed that view of Clinton in a Pew Research Center survey in January 1993, and His cabinet choices ... Approve 59 64 58 65% who approved of George Bush Sr.’s policy Disapprove 15 15 16 explanations in a Gallup Poll twelve years ago. Don't know 26 21 26 100 100 100 1989 figures are from ABC News; 1993 are from U.S. News & World Report. Partisan hostility explains Bush’s lower ratings as only 29% of Democrats and independents who lean Democratic approve of the job the president-elect has done in communicating his plans. In contrast, Republicans and independents who lean to the GOP were far more positive toward Clinton in 1993, when 43% approved of his initial policy presentations. Bush gets somewhat higher grades for his cabinet selections (58% approval).1 While these ratings are lower than Clinton’s, they are comparable to his father’s and better than the ratings Ronald Reagan’s cabinet received in 1981. Further, the Pew survey, which was conducted among a national sample of 1,258 adults Jan. 3-7, found that relatively few people (21%) believe his cabinet picks and other high-level appointments are too conservative; half think they are about right ideologically. The selection of Colin Powell may have a lot to do with this, as 33% were able to identify the retired general as a member of the new cabinet — a much higher number than could recall the name of any Clinton nominee in 1993. By a 56% to 29% margin, Americans think it is a good thing that many of Bush’s top advisors worked in his father’s administration. In that regard only 12% think that Dick Cheney is playing too large a role in the new administration. Even at this early stage, 31% think Cheney will be a successful vice president — a somewhat higher number than think Bush will be a successful president. Flagging economic optimism may be Financial Pessimism on the Rise one of the first problems confronting the new administration. There has been a significant Jan Feb Jan Jan 1992 1995 1999 2001 increase in the number of Americans who Personal finances will ... %%%% expect to be worse off financially over the Improve 55 64 72 57 course of the year: 27% express that view now, Stay the same (Vol.) 16 17 14 12 Worsen 24 16 10 27 compared to about 10% in January 1999. In fact, Don't know 5 3 4 4 the economic expectations voiced in the current 100 100 100 100 survey are the least positive on this measure 1992 figures are from U.S. News & World Report. since 1992, when Clinton was campaigning for office on a promise to jump-start the economy. Similarly, public interest in stories about the economy and financial conditions is as high as it has been since 1994, when many people still believed the economy was in a recession. 1 The survey was fielded before Linda Chavez withdrew her name as Bush's nominee for Secretary of Labor. -2- Not surprisingly, the state of the economy has gained importance in the eyes of the public. More than eight-in-ten (81%) rate keeping the economy strong as the leading priority for the president and Congress. While partisan divisions persist in the wake of the election, Republicans, Democrats and independents agree that maintaining strong economic growth should be Washington’s first order of business. Partisan tensions are apparent in public perceptions of which groups will thrive and which ones will lose ground in the Bush years. Majorities think that business corporations, the military and Christian conservatives will gain in influence, while pluralities think feminists, poor people, environmentalists, and union leaders will wane in influence. Already, Bush himself is seen as tilting to the right; by 48%-37%, the public thinks the new president is listening more to the conservatives than the moderates in his party. Priorities for ‘01 Perhaps not surprisingly, given the public’s growing financial concerns, keeping the economy strong has overtaken education as the public’s leading policy priority. Improving education, which led the list of priorities last year, is now second. As Bush prepares to begin his Top Priorities for the Nation presidency, there are notable areas of bipartisan agreement, although vast All Rep Dem Ind Priorities ... %%%% differences continue to divide the parties. Keeping economy strong 81 78 84 81 Aside from the economy, Republicans, Improving educational system 78 76 81 76 Democrats and independents all rate Reducing crime 76 69 82 72 Securing Social Security 74 67 80 74 improving education, reducing crime, and Adding Medicare drug benefits 73 60 80 72 securing Social Security and Medicare very Securing Medicare 71 64 79 69 highly. In addition, a strong consensus has Regulating HMOs 66 54 77 60 emerged in favor of a middle-class tax cut, Reducing middle class taxes 66 63 65 67 Dealing with problems of poor 63 48 75 62 with better than six-in-ten in each group Protecting the environment 63 45 74 68 calling tax cuts a top priority. Providing insurance to uninsured 61 46 74 60 Improving the job situation 60 48 66 60 Paying off the national debt 54 49 55 58 But Republicans and Democrats are Working to reduce racial tensions 52 40 64 52 far apart on the importance of a wide range Dealing with moral breakdown 51 61 45 46 of issues, including protecting the Strengthening the military 48 63 45 41 environment, gun control, health care, Strengthening gun control laws 47 34 61 44 Developing missile defense 41 49 36 37 strengthening the military and improving Reforming campaign finance 37 30 40 42 the nation’s moral climate. Almost three- Dealing with global trade 37 42 38 32 -3- quarters of Democrats and nearly as many independents (68%) rate the environment as a top priority; less than half of Republicans (45%) agree. Democrats are also far more likely than Republicans to regard providing insurance for the uninsured and toughening gun control laws as major priorities. Conversely, Republicans attach greater importance to building up the military and dealing with the nation’s moral breakdown. Better than six-in-ten Republicans see those issues as leading priorities, compared to fewer than half of Democrats and independents. Republicans are also more likely than Democrats to view missile defense as a top priority; still, only about half (49%) of Republicans see this as very important. There also is a gender gap over the nation’s priorities, although men and women alike place the economy and education at the top of the list. Women are far more likely to rate insuring the uninsured (68% vs. 53% of men), improving the job situation (65% vs. 53%) and helping the poor and needy (69% vs. 58%) as top priorities. Strengthening the armed forces ranks as more important for men than it does for women (53%-42%). GOP Narrows Issues Gap Republicans have made considerable The Party with Better Ideas headway over the past two years in cutting into the Democrats’ issues advantage.
Recommended publications
  • Pdf-USFWS NEWS
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fish & Wildlife News National Wildlife Refuge System Centennial Special Edition Spring 2003 Prelude . 1 Table of Director’s Corner: Looking Back, Looking Forward . 2 System of Lands for Wildlife and People for Today and Tomorrow . 3 Contents Future of the Refuge System. 4 Fulfilling the Promise for One Hundred Years . 5 Keeping the Service in the Fish & Wildlife Service . 6 Past . 8 Timeline of Refuge Creation . 9 Shaping the NWRS: 100 Years of History The First 75 Years: A Varied and Colorful History . 12 The Last 25 Years: Our Refuge System . 16 The First Refuge Manager . 18 Pelican Island’s First Survey. 21 CCC Had Profound Effect on Refuge System . 22 Refuge Pioneer: Tom Atkeson . 23 From Air Boats to Rain Gauges . 23 A Refuge Hero Called “Mr. Conservation” . 24 Programs . 25 The Duck Stamp: It’s Not Just for Hunters––Refuges Benefit Too 26 Caught in a Web and Glad of It. 27 Aquatic Resources Conservation on Refuges . 28 To Conserve and Protect: Law Enforcement on Refuges . 29 Jewels of the Prairie Shine Like Diamonds in the Refuge System Crown . 30 Untrammeled by Man . 31 Ambassadors to Alaska: The Refuge Information Technicians Program . 32 Realty’s Role: Adding to the NWRS . 34 Safe Havens for Endangered Species. 34 The Lasting Legacy of Three Fallen Firefighters: Origins of Professional Firefighting in the Refuge System . 35 Part Boot Camp: Part Love-In . 36 Sanctuary and Stewardship for Employees. 37 How a Big, Foreign-Born Rat Came to Personify a Wildlife Refuge Battle with Aquatic Nuisance Species .
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Agencies, Commissions, Boards
    INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS, BOARDS ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 809, 20004 phone 606–8503, http://www.achp.gov [Created by Public Law 89–665, as amended] Chairman.—John L. Nau III, Houston, Texas. Vice Chairman.—Bernadette Castro, Albany, New York. Expert Members: Bruce D. Judd, San Francisco, California. Susan S. Schanlaber, Aurora, Illinois. Ann Alexander Pritzlaff, Denver, Colorado. Julia A. King, St. Leonard, Maryland. Citizen Members: Emily Summers, Dallas, Texas. Carolyn J. Brackett, Nashville, Tennessee. Native American Member: Raynard C. Soon, Honolulu, Hawaii. Governor.—Hon. Tim Pawlenty, St. Paul, Minnesota. Mayor.—Hon. Bob Young, Augusta, Georgia. Architect of the Capitol.—Hon. Alan M. Hantman, FAIA. Secretary, Department of: Agriculture.—Hon. Ann M. Veneman. Interior.—Hon. Gale A. Norton. Defense.—Hon. Donald H. Rumsfeld. Transportation.—Hon. Norman Y. Mineta. Administrator: Environmental Protection Agency.—[Vacant]. General Services Administration.—Hon. Stephen A. Perry. National Trust for Historic Preservation.—William B. Hart, Chairman, South Berwick, Maine. National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers.—Edward F. Sanderson, President, Providence, Rhode Island. AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION 1400 Eye Street NW, Suite 1000, 20005–2248, phone 673–3916, fax 673–3810 E-mail: [email protected]; Wb: www.adf.gov [Created by Public Law 96–533] BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chairman.—Ernest G. Green. Vice Chairman.—Willie Grace Campbell. Private Members: [Vacant]. Public Members: [Vacant]. STAFF President.—Nathaniel Fields. Vice President.—[Vacant]. Advisory Committee Management.—[Vacant]. Congressional Liaison Officer.—Roger Ervin. 763 764 Congressional Directory General Counsel.—Doris Mason Martin. Budget and Finance Director.—Vicki L. Gentry. Management and Information Systems.—Thomas F. Wilson.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Claim Appeals Office Table of Cases
    Industrial Claim Appeals Office Table of Cases This is a list of all cases included in the library in alphabetical order. Click on any of the case titles to go directly to the full text. (Click here to go to the list of Premium Liability Cases) A Action Key Punch Service, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 709 P.2d 970 (Colo. App. 1985) Albertsons, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 735 P.2d 220 (Colo. App. 1987) Andersen v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 281, 447 P.2d 221 (1968) Arias v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 850 P.2d 161 (Colo. App. 1993) B Baca v. Marriott Hotels, Inc., 732 P.2d 1252 (Colo. App. 1986) Baldwin v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 813 P.2d 807 (Colo. App. 1991) Bartholomay v. Industrial Commission, 642 P.2d 50 (Colo. App. 1982) Bayly Mfg. Co. v. Department of Employment, 395 P.2d 216, 155 Colo. 433 (Colo. 1964) Beinor v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 262 P.3d 970, (Colo. App. 2011) Board of County Commissioners v. Martinez, 43 Colo. App. 322, 602 P.2d 911 (1979), overruled on other grounds sub nom. Industrial Commission v. Board of County Commissioners, 690 P.2d 839 (Colo. 1984) Board of Water Commissioners v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 881 P.2d 476 (Colo. App. 1994) Boeheim v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 23 P.3d 1247 (Colo. App. 2001) C Campbell v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 97 P.3d 204 (Colo. App. 2003) Chris the Crazy Trader, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 81 P.3d 1148 (Colo. App. 2003) City and County of Denver v.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Mary Lathrop
    THE LEGACY OF MARY LATHROP Mary Lathrop was born in 1865 to a Philadelphia Quaker family. At age 19, she became a reporter at a local newspaper where she pursued a distinguished career until ill health forced her to choose a new career at age 30. She came to Colorado, decided to go into law, and graduated first in her class from the University of Denver School of Law. She passed the Colorado Bar in 1896 with a score that would stand as a record until 1941. She hung her shingle in Colorado in 1897, specializing in probate law. After being turned down twice because “women should not practice law,” she was the first woman admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court in Colorado. Her “firsts” also include being the first woman to open a law office in Colorado, first woman to argue before the Colorado Supreme Court, first woman to be admitted to the U.S. Supreme Court, and first woman to join the Colorado and Denver Bar Associations. She was also one of the first two women to join the American Bar Association. She helped re-draft probate statutes in Colorado and assisted in developing the Small Guardianship Law. Her most famous case was Clayton v. Hallett, which established the law of charitable bequests in Colorado. At the time of her death in 1951, she had received numerous awards. During her lifetime, she made anonymous donations to help students. After her death, she left the bulk of her estate to establish a student loan fund at the University of Denver.
    [Show full text]
  • State Election Results, 1993
    STATE OF COLORADO TRACT OF VOTES CAST 1993-1994 EMBER ODD-YEAR ELECTION November 2, 1993 PRIMARY ELECTION August 9, 1994 GENERAL ELECTION November 8, 1994 Published by VICTORIA BUCKLEY Secretary of State To: Citizens of Colorado From: Victoria Buckley, Secretary of State Subject: 1993-1994 Abstract of Votes I am honored to present you with this official publication of the 1993-1994 Abstract of Votes Cast. The information compiled in this summary is from material filed in my office by the county clerk and recorders. This publication will assist in the profiling of voting patterns of Colorado voters during the 1993 odd-year election and the 1994 primary and general elections. Therefore, I commemorate this abstract to those who practice their rights as Colorado citizens pursuant to the Constitution of Colorado. Article IT, Section 5, of the Colorado Constitution states: Elections and Licensing Division "All elections shall be free and open; and no power, Office of the Secretary of State civil or military, shall at any time interfere to 1560 Broadway, Suite 200 prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage. " Denver, Colorado 80202 Phone (303) 894-2680 Victoria Buckley, Secretary of State Willliam A. Hobbs, Elections Officer PRICE $10.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Glossary of Abstract Terms . 1 Research Assistance . 3 Directory of Elected and Appointed Officials Federal and State Officers . 4 State Senate . 5 State House of Representatives . ·. 8 District Attorneys . 12 Supreme Court Justices . 13 Court of Appeals Judges . 13 District Judges . 13 Judicial District Administrators . 17 Moffat Tunnel Commission and RTD Board of Directors ...
    [Show full text]
  • Women Appointed to Presidential Cabinets
    WOMEN APPOINTED TO PRESIDENTIAL CABINETS Eleven women have been confirmed to serve in cabinet (6) and cabinet level (5) positions in the Biden administration.1 A total of 64 women have held a total of 72 such positions in presidential administrations, with eight women serving in two different posts. (These figures do not include acting officials.) Among the 64 women, 41 were appointed by Democratic presidents and 23 by Republican presidents. Only 12 U.S presidents (5D, 7R) have appointed women to cabinet or cabinet-level positions since the first woman was appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933.2 Party breakdown of women appointed to Presidential Cabinets: 41D 23R Cabinet or Cabinet-level Firsts: First Woman First Black Woman First Latina First Asian Pacific First Native Appointed Appointed Appointed Islander Woman American Woman Appointed Appointed Frances Perkins Patricia Roberts Aída Álvarez Elaine Chao Debra Haaland Secretary of Labor Harris Administrator, Secretary of Labor Secretary of the 1933 (Roosevelt) Secretary of Small Business 2001 (G.W. Bush) Interior Housing and Urban Administration 2021 (Biden) Development 1997 (Clinton) 1977 (Carter) To date, 27 cabinet or cabinet-level posts have been filled by women. Cabinet and cabinet-level positions vary by presidential administration. Our final authority for designating cabinet or cabinet-level in an 1 This does not include Shalanda Young, who currently serves as Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget. 2 In addition, although President Truman did not appoint any women, Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins, a holdover from the Roosevelt administration, served in his cabinet. © COPYRIGHT 2021 Center for American Women and Politic, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University 4/6/2021 administration is that president's official library.
    [Show full text]
  • \\Fileprod-Prc-Dc\Peoplepress\Pew Projects\2001\01-01 1 Jan NII
    PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS JANUARY 2001 NEWS INTEREST INDEX FINAL TOPLINE January 3-7, 2001 N = 1,258 Q.1 Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as president? [IF DK ENTER AS DK. IF DEPENDS PROBE ONCE WITH: Overall do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as President? IF STILL DEPENDS ENTER AS DK] Approve Disapprove Don't Know January, 2001 61 30 9=100 July, 2000 55 34 11=100 June, 2000 56 35 9=100 May, 2000 57 33 10=100 April, 2000 57 31 12=100 March, 2000 57 35 8=100 February, 2000 58 33 9=100 January, 2000 56 35 9=100 December, 1999 55 35 10=100 October, 1999 59 34 7=100 Late September, 1999 59 33 8=100 September, 1999 56 36 8=100 August, 1999 60 32 8=100 July, 1999 58 31 11=100 June, 1999 55 35 10=100 May, 1999 56 34 10=100 April, 1999 56 38 6=100 March, 1999 62 31 7=100 February, 1999 64 30 6=100 Mid-January, 1999 66 29 5=100 January, 1999 63 30 7=100 Late December, 1998 71 27 2=100 Early December, 1998 61 32 7=100 November, 1998 65 29 6=100 September 21-22, 1998 62 33 5=100 September 19-20, 1998 55 36 9=100 Early September, 1998 61 33 6=100 Late August, 1998 62 32 6=100 Early August, 1998 63 28 9=100 June, 1998 59 32 9=100 May, 1998 62 28 10=100 April, 1998 62 28 10=100 March, 1998 65 26 9=100 Early February, 1998 71 26 3=100 January, 1998 61 30 9=100 November, 1997 58 31 11=100 September, 1997 58 29 13=100 August, 1997 59 32 9=100 June, 1997 54 34 12=100 May, 1997 57 34 9=100 April, 1997 55 34 11=100 February, 1997 60 32 8=100 -1- Q.1 CONTINUED ..
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Inaugural Nominee Announcements: Trump-Clinton
    PRE-INAUGURAL NOMINEE ANNOUNCEMENTS: TRUMP-CLINTON Melanie Geller Drew Flanagan ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT The last four presidents announced 115 nominees for Senate-confirmed positions prior to taking office. Among these, 71, including 49 out of 56 Cabinet nominees, received pre-inauguration hearings.1 Only eight nominations by four presidents were withdrawn. This document contains tables listing each announcement sorted by president, along with key dates and speed of confirmation for each nominee. Secretaries of the 15 Cabinet departments are denoted in boldface. Preceding each table is a supplementary narrative discussing events and influences that affected each transition team and their pre- inaugural nominations. Summary • The Trump transition team announced 29 nominees during the transition period from election to inauguration, and the Senate confirmed 26. Fifteen nominees received pre-inaugural hearings. For a variety of reasons, including vetting, paperwork, controversy and a high number of procedural votes, the Trump nominees took much longer than the nominees of other presidents. The Senate confirmed Trump’s Cabinet secretaries in 23.9 days, on average. • The Obama transition team announced 42 nominees, including Secretary of Defense Gates, who stayed on from the George W. Bush administration. Twenty-five received pre-inaugural hearings. Obama’s Cabinet secretaries were confirmed in an average of 4.9 days. • Even with a truncated transition, the George W. Bush transition team announced 20 nominees during the transition, including Director of the CIA George Tenet, who remained in his position. Fourteen received pre-inaugural hearings. The Senate confirmed all except for one in about 3 days and confirmed Cabinet secretaries in 1.6 days, on average.
    [Show full text]
  • George W. Bush and Barack Obama: the Dichotomy of Religious Influence in American Policy
    Himalayan Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies Open Access Review Article George W. Bush and Barack Obama: The Dichotomy of Religious Influence in American Policy Birane Sene American and Caribbean Studies Laboratory Cheikh Anta Diop University of Dakar, Senegal Abstract: The United States has become a secular Republic after its foundation by religious *Corresponding Author dissidents called puritans. Despite that shift, America is still struggling to get out of the Birane Sene bondage of the religion into which it has locked itself. American leaders and citizens do not have the same conception of the separation between religion and politics. America has Article History always mixed religion and politics in a way that is not appreciated by the proponents of Received: 10.03.2021 absolute separation. Even today, this overlapping exists between church and State. This Accepted: 20.04.2021 separation is thus based on a fragile compromise, especially since the competing political Published: 30.04.2021 parties regularly resort to it for ideological purposes. Many politicians are grappling with the implementation of this balancing game. The cases of President George W. Bush and Citations: Barack Obama are very telling examples that should be studied very closely given the Birane Sene (2021); George W. Bush and political context that was prevailing. Barack Obama: The Dichotomy of Religious Influence in American Policy; Keywords: Administration; Bush; Influence; Obama; Policy; Religion; United States Hmlyn J Human Cul Stud, 2(2) 46-51 INTRODUCTION The influence of religion on American politics is not a new phenomenon but there is one fact that has remarkably exacerbated the relationship between religion and politics in recent decades.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitutional Politics of Presidential Succession
    THE CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS OF PRESIDENTIAL SUCCESSION Richard Albert* I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 498 II. THE SUCCESSION REGIME ......................................................... 500 A. Founding Foresight............................................................. 501 B. The Original Design ........................................................... 504 C. The Revised Sequence........................................................ 509 D. The Modern Order.............................................................. 513 III. THE SUCCESSION STAKES.......................................................... 518 A. Constitutional Clarity......................................................... 519 B. Partisanship and Tradition.................................................. 524 C. Democratic Stability........................................................... 528 IV. THE SUCCESSION SOLUTION...................................................... 533 A. The Limits of the Conventional.......................................... 534 B. Temporary Presidential Succession.................................... 539 C. Competence and Continuity ............................................... 547 D. Amending Presidential Succession..................................... 557 E. The Challenge of Constitutional Amendment.................... 567 V. CONCLUSION.............................................................................. 575 * Assistant Professor, Boston College Law School;
    [Show full text]
  • Mcdonald, J. William
    ORAL HISTORY INTERVIEWS J. WILLIAM MCDONALD Ë Ë Ë Ë Ë Ë STATUS OF INTERVIEWS: OPEN FOR RESEARCH Ë Ë Ë Ë Ë Ë Interviews Conducted and Edited by: Brit Allan Storey Senior Historian Bureau of Reclamation Ë Ë Ë Ë Ë Ë Interviews conducted–1993 and 2011 Interview edited and published–2014 Oral History Program Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado SUGGESTED CITATION: MCDONALD, J. WILLIAM. ORAL HISTORY INTERVIEW. Transcript of tape- recorded Bureau of Reclamation Oral History Interviews conducted by Brit Allan Story, Senior Historian, Bureau of Reclamation, from1993 to 2011, in Denver, Colorado. Edited by Brit Allan Storey, further edited and desktop published by Andrew H. Gahan. Repository for the record copy of the interview transcript is the National Archives and Records Administration in College Park, Maryland, or in the regional office in the Denver, Colorado, area. Record copies of this transcript are printed on 20 lb., 100% cotton, archival quality paper. All other copies are printed on normal duplicating paper. i Table of Contents Table of Contents.. i Statement of Donation. iv Editorial Convention. vi Introduction. vii Oral History Interviews. 1 Early Life. 1 Getting Into Resource Management.. 2 Colorado Water Conservation Board.. 3 Colorado Water Conservation Board's Relationship with Reclamation. 5 Promoting Water Projects in Colorado. 6 Carter's "Hit List".. 8 Projects of Interest to the Water Conservation Board. 8 A Transition in Ways People Thought About Water Projects.. 10 Partisan Politics Seldom an Issue in Making Colorado Water Policy. 12 Water Board's Demographic Make-Up. 13 The Board's Political Routine. 14 Environmental Impact Issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Courts Must Declare the Sense of The
    31455_FS_cvr 4/30/07 9:09 PM Page 1 “The CourtsCourts mustmust declaredeclare thethe sensesense ofof the the law;law; andand ifif they they shouldshould bebe disposeddisposed toto exerciseexercise WILL insteadinstead ofof JUDGMENT, the consequencesconsequences would bebe thethe substitutionsubstitution ofof their their pleasurepleasure for thatthat ofof the the legislativelegislative body.”body.” THE FEDERALIST 78 AANNUALNNUAL RREPORTEPORT 20062006 (I(ISSUEDSSUED:: AAPRILPRIL 2007)2007) STAFF PRESIDENT Eugene B. Meyer FOUNDING DIRECTORS XECUTIVE ICE RESIDENT FINANCE DIRECTOR Hon. E. Spencer Abraham E V P Leonard A. Leo Douglas C. Ubben Steven G. Calabresi LAWYERS DIVISION STUDENT DIVISION Hon. David M. McIntosh Dean A. Reuter, Practice Groups Director Peter Redpath, Director Lee Liberman Otis Lisa Budzynski, Lawyers Chapters Director Sarah Roderick, Associate Director Mia Reynolds, State Courts Project Director Lisa Graff, Assistant Director DIRECTORS/OFFICERS Juli A. Nix, Deputy Director Kyle Reini, Assistant Director David C.F. Ray, Associate Director Steven G. Calabresi, Chairman John Paul Fox, Assistant Director DEVELOPMENT Hon. David M. McIntosh, Vice Chairman Alyssa Haupt, Assistant Director Patty Price, Director Debbie O’Malley, Assistant Director Cynthia Searcy, Associate Director Gary S. Lawson, Secretary IRECTOR FACULTY DIVISION DIRECTOR Brent O. Hatch, Treasurer IT D C. David Smith Hayley Reynolds Eugene B. Meyer, President • • • PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR Peter Aigner Hon. T. Kenneth Cribb, Jr., Counselor MEMBERSHIP DIRECTOR BOARD OF V ISITORS Terry Archambeault Hon. Robert H. Bork, Co-Chairman OFFICE MANAGER Rhonda Moaland Hon. Orrin G. Hatch, Co-Chairman Matthew Nix, Assistant Lillian BeVier Hon. Lois Haight Herrington Hon. Donald Paul Hodel Table of Contents Hon. Frank Keating From the President . Page 3 Harvey C.
    [Show full text]