Seismograph Station Codes and Characteristics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seismograph Station Codes and Characteristics GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 791 Seismograph Station Codes and Characteristics Seismograph Station Codes and Characteristics By Barbara B. Poppe, Debbi A. Naab, and John S. Derr G E 0 L 0 G I CAL 5 U R V E Y C I R C U LA R 791 1978 United States Department of the Interior CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary Geological Survey H. William Menard, Director Free on application to Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey, 1200 South fads Street, Arlington, VA 22202 CONTENTS Page Introduc,tion ........•..........................•............................ 1 Code assignment ••.•.•.•••. .•.••...••.•........•••....•.•••...•..•....••..••. 2 Description of tables ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 2 Pub 1 i cat ions • • . • • • . • . • . • • . • • • • . • • . • • . • . • • . • • • • . • • • . • · • . · •• · • • • • 4 Glossary of abbreviations ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8 TABLES Table !.--Operating stations listed alphabetically by code •••••••••••••••••• 9 Table 2.--Closed stations listed alphabetically by code ••••••••••••••••••••• 92 Table 3.--Stations included in standard u.s. Geological Survey networks ••••• 127 Table 4.--Alternate names for stations •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 129 Table 5.--Countries having stations, listed by continent and island groups •• 131 Table 6.--LRSM stations, listed alphabetically by code •••••••••••••••••••••• 132 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.--u.s. map showing the telemetered network recorded at NElS •••••••• 3 Figure 2.--World map showing the Worldwide Standardized Seismograph Network. 5 Figure 3.--World map showing the standard u.s. Geological Survey digital- recording stations................................................. 6 Cross index by country, region, and station code •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 141 III Seismograph Station Codes and Characteristics By Barbara B. Poppe, Debbi A. Naab, and John S. Derr INTRODUCTION The seismological community will soon be entering its second 100 years of activity as it marks the centennial of a handful of seismograph stations. In the 100 years since the first few installations began timed recording of earth-shaking, the number of stations has ballooned into the thousands, which has led to the necessity for indexing and cataloging these stations. The stations contained in this publication represent the large portion of the world's installations that are operated in a cooperative spirit; they are stations that have exchanged data with one or both of the largest data centers for teleseismic data: the NElS (National Earthquake Information Service) and the ISC (International Seismological Centre). Hoping that this cooperation will continue, we urge all operators to check their station coordinates and inform us of corrections or additions. The earliest catalogs, such as a 1908 publication of the Bureau Central de !'Association Internationale de Sismologie, listed all the stations operating in the world at the time; nearly 200 existed then, referred to by name and country. By 1931, in a second edition of the Bulletin of the National Research Council's List of Seismological Stations of the World, McComb and West listed 350 stations operating worldwide. By 1960, the USC&GS (u.s. Coast and Geodetic Survey) had adapted the station data for use on the computer and thus assigned three-letter codes to the stations from which they had received data. This informal code system became recognized as a valuable tool and began being used outside the USC&GS. Consequently, the USC&GS published its list of station codes in 1962, followed by several rev1s1ons and addenda. The task of assigning codes was carried to the USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) in 1972, when the responsibility for Government seismological activities was reassigned to the USGS. This publication is an update of the 1974 NElS publication "Seismograph Station Abbreviations and Coordinates" by Pamela A. Covington. The NElS now maintains this list as an integral part of its work which is, among other things, to rapidly locate all teleseismic events that are accurately recorded by at least five well-distributed stations. Currently, about 6,000 earthquakes are located each year. Particular emphasis is given to u.s. 1 earthquakes, which are located rapidly with the aid of a telemetry network of about 60 stations recorded in Golden, Colo. (See fig. 1.) A standby service is always in operation so that any major event in the United States or the world can be located within 2 to 3 hours of its occurrence; this service makes use of the telemetered network and any telephone or telegraph information that is received. Any arrival-time data that are received at the NElS are used for locating events as long as proper identification of a station is established. The information contained in this publication for each station comprises the essential. details required. CODE ASSIGNMENT As stated above, only stations that have contributed data to the NElS or ISC have had codes assigned. Three- or four-letter codes are assigned using the following ground rules: the first letter should be the first letter of the name of the neareBt town or geographically identifiable place (for instance, Golden, Colo., station should start with a G), and the last letter can indicate the country or region •. There are several code restrictions. Telegraphic transmission of data requires that certain codes be forbidden; a list of these codes is checked before any code is assigned. Stations that have been moved more than 1 km are assigned new codes. In some microseismic networks, locations are accurate to much less than 1 km and, in these instances, new codes can be assigned, if requested. For teleseismic work, however, 1-km resolution is adequate. All four-letter codes ending in 0 have been reserved for SRO (Seismic Research Observatory) and ASRO (Abbreviated Seismic Research Observatory) stations; this coding alerts the computer to automatically identify and interpret trace amplitudes when they are received. In order to make use of data as soon as it is received, a code is reserved when preliminary information about a new station is communicated to the NElS. If no data are registered under a reserved code within a year or two of assignment, the code is deleted, thus allowing it to be assigned to another station. ~fuen data are received for a reserved station, the data are immediately identifiable and the station is changed to an "open" status. Once a station is opened, its code will remain in the files permanently and will never be reassigned to another station. When an open station is discontinued, the code status changes to "closed" but remains a permanent entry. It is hard to ascertain when a station closes, because mere lack of receipt of data is not enough evidence for closing a station. The station operators should relay information to NElS when a station's status is closed. DESCRIPTION OF TABLES Tables 1 and 2 are both listings of codes, station names, and locations; table 1 lists open stations and table 2 lists closed stations. Names listed in parentheses are "alternate 2 j~ c------T~------~------~~------~~------~"ru-·------~'uro~-------~'ur'--------~~ro-______ _,~4~--------~,u~--------~;o~"-------;~<~"------~'~r"------~7;4"________ 7~0~"------~6~6-'----~ 3F w ' \ V'~ \, r ,~ \ 0 MILES 500 Figure 1.--The telemetered network recorded at NElS. Triangles represent stations; station codes, which are listed in table 1, are noted alongside. names," which are cross-referenced in table 4. The region is listed in areas where subdivisions are useful, as in Japan, U.S.S.R., and the U.S.A. The country generally is the sovereignty of the area, but does not always reflect possession (Easter Island is not listed under Chile). Preceding the tables is a glossary of abbreviations used throughout the publication. Owing to the nature of our computer storage and printing capabilities, diacritical marks could not be used. Latitude and Longitude are listed first in degrees, minutes, and seconds, then as degrees and decimal degrees. Either form reflects the accuracy of the coordinates as reported to us and is not meant to imply uniform accuracy. The elevation of the instrument is in meters. For borehole installations, the elevation is that of the seismometer in the borehole. If the elevation is given as 0, it may be 0, nearly 0, or unknown. However, some unknown elevations were estimated to be 400. Standardized networks that are administered by the USGS are noted under the heading "Station networks." Table 3 is a quick reference for all stations belonging to one of the standard u.s. Geological Survey networks. These standard networks are plotted in figures 2 and 3. Table 4 is a cross-reference of alternate names; it is meant to help find a station code that often does not start with the same first letter as the alternate station name. Thus, the alternate name Marguerite Bay, Antarctica, can be used to find its code, ANC. Table 5 lists, by continents and general regions, countries or island groups that operate at least one seismograph station; the classification "Islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans" groups together all the islands in this region, regarQless of sovereignty. Table 6 is a list of LRSM (Long Range Seismic Measurement) stations, organized by ARPA (Advance Research Projects Agency). These station were installed to monitor nuclear tests and most operated during a very limited time frame. These codes are not cross indexed. The cross index alphabetically lists all codes under their country and region. Thus, at a
Recommended publications
  • Vol.61,No.7, July, 1984 Old Timer's Party July 14 WMC 11 T11 Shirts For
    WASATCH MOUNTAIN CLUB Vol.61,No.7, July, 1984 IDGHUGHTS OF TIDS ISSUE Old Timer's Party July 14 WMC 11 T11 Shirts for Sale President's Questionaire Results Stop the Pothunters!!! Half Price Grand Canyon Rafting Maze Trip Report Paria Canyon Report Letters to the Editor Wasatch Mountain Club Persons wishing to become members of the Wasatch Mountain Club should request, either in writing or by telephone, an application form from the Membership Director. Perspective members will receive two free consecutive issues of the Rambler which includes a schedule of activities and an application form. Applicants must participate in two club activites (excluding socials) verified by the date and signature of the trip leader on the application form. Participants must sign a liability release form on all club activities. Dues are as follows: $10.00 Single, $15.00 Couple, and a $5.00 initiation/re-instatement fee. DIRECTORS President Robert H. Wright 1-649-4194 Secretary Janet Friend 278-0358 Treasurer Stephen Carr 466-2881 Rafting George Yurich 546-2665 Conservation Mike Budig 328-4512 Entertainment Jeanne Pratt 561-3011 Michelle Perkins 295-6475 Penny Archibald 277-1432 Membership Joan Proctor 582-8440 Hiking Peter Hansen 359-2040 Lodge Alexis Kelner 359-5387 Sherie Pater 278-6661 Mountaineering John Veranth 278-5826 Ski Touring George Westbrook 942-6071 Kayaking Jim Hood 484-2338 Publications Earl Cook 531-6339 COORDINATORS Bicycling Rich Stone 583-2439 Volleyball Tom Silberstorf 467-5734 Canoeing Chet Morris 466-2101 Historian Dale Green 277-6417 TRUSTEES Karin Caldwell 942-6065 Bob Everson 487-0029 Mike Treshow 467-8814 Stewart Ogden 359-2221 O'Dell Peterson, Trustee Emeritus THE RAMBLER (USPS 053-410) is Deadline for THE RAMBLER is the 15th published monthly by the WASATCH of each month @ 6:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaginative Geographies of Mars: the Science and Significance of the Red Planet, 1877 - 1910
    Copyright by Kristina Maria Doyle Lane 2006 The Dissertation Committee for Kristina Maria Doyle Lane Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: IMAGINATIVE GEOGRAPHIES OF MARS: THE SCIENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RED PLANET, 1877 - 1910 Committee: Ian R. Manners, Supervisor Kelley A. Crews-Meyer Diana K. Davis Roger Hart Steven D. Hoelscher Imaginative Geographies of Mars: The Science and Significance of the Red Planet, 1877 - 1910 by Kristina Maria Doyle Lane, B.A.; M.S.C.R.P. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2006 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to Magdalena Maria Kost, who probably never would have understood why it had to be written and certainly would not have wanted to read it, but who would have been very proud nonetheless. Acknowledgments This dissertation would have been impossible without the assistance of many extremely capable and accommodating professionals. For patiently guiding me in the early research phases and then responding to countless followup email messages, I would like to thank Antoinette Beiser and Marty Hecht of the Lowell Observatory Library and Archives at Flagstaff. For introducing me to the many treasures held deep underground in our nation’s capital, I would like to thank Pam VanEe and Ed Redmond of the Geography and Map Division of the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. For welcoming me during two brief but productive visits to the most beautiful library I have seen, I thank Brenda Corbin and Gregory Shelton of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Triangulation in Utah 1871-1934
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 913 TRIANGULATION IN UTAH 1871-1934 J. G. STAACK Chief Topographic Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1940 Tor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 20 cents (paper) CONTENTS Page Introduction ______________________________________________________ 1 Scope of report------__-_-_---_----_------------ --__---__ _ 1 Precision __ _ ________________________ _ __________________ _ ___ 1 Instruments used._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 Station marks___- _ _.__ __ __ _ 2 Datum_-_-_-__ __________________________ ______ ______-___.__ 3 Methods of readjustment..._____.-.__..________.___._._...___.__ 4 Form of results__-.________________________ _.___-_____.______ 5 Arrangement__.______________________________ _ ___ _ ________ 6 Descriptions of stations._______________________________________ 6 Azimuths and distances.__ ____-_.._---_--_________ -____ __ __ ^ 7 Maps.__----__-----_-_---__-_--_-___-_-___-__-__-_-_-___.-.__ 7 Personnel_ _ __-----_-_-_---_---------_--__-____-__-_.--_.___ . 7 Projects 9 Uinta Forest Reserve, 1897-98_ 9 Cottonwood and Park City special quadrangles, 1903____ _ 19 Iron Springs special quadrangle, 1905____________________________ 22 Northeastern Utah, 1909.. -_. 26 Eastern Utah, 1910 - . 30 Logan quadrangle, 1913._________-__-__'_--______-___:_____.____ 42 Uintah County, 1913___-__. 48 Eastern Utah, 1914.. ... _ _ .. 55 Northern Utah, 1915 (Hodgeson)_____-___ __-___-_-_-__-_--. _. 58 Northern Utah, 1915 <Urquhart)_.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Subsurface Properties and Crater Formation Processes Inferred from Fresh Impact Crater Geometries
    Martian Subsurface Properties and Crater Formation Processes Inferred From Fresh Impact Crater Geometries The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Stewart, Sarah T., and Gregory J. Valiant. 2006. Martian subsurface properties and crater formation processes inferred from fresh impact crater geometries. Meteoritics and Planetary Sciences 41: 1509-1537. Published Version http://meteoritics.org/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4727301 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Meteoritics & Planetary Science 41, Nr 10, 1509–1537 (2006) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Martian subsurface properties and crater formation processes inferred from fresh impact crater geometries Sarah T. STEWART* and Gregory J. VALIANT Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 22 October 2005; revision accepted 30 June 2006) Abstract–The geometry of simple impact craters reflects the properties of the target materials, and the diverse range of fluidized morphologies observed in Martian ejecta blankets are controlled by the near-surface composition and the climate at the time of impact. Using the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) data set, quantitative information about the strength of the upper crust and the dynamics of Martian ejecta blankets may be derived from crater geometry measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2003.06799V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 6 Feb 2021
    Thomas Ruedas1,2 Doris Breuer2 Electrical and seismological structure of the martian mantle and the detectability of impact-generated anomalies final version 18 September 2020 published: Icarus 358, 114176 (2021) 1Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany 2Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Berlin, Germany arXiv:2003.06799v2 [astro-ph.EP] 6 Feb 2021 The version of record is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114176. This author pre-print version is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Electrical and seismological structure of the martian mantle and the detectability of impact-generated anomalies Thomas Ruedas∗ Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Berlin, Germany Doris Breuer Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Berlin, Germany Highlights • Geophysical subsurface impact signatures are detectable under favorable conditions. • A combination of several methods will be necessary for basin identification. • Electromagnetic methods are most promising for investigating water concentrations. • Signatures hold information about impact melt dynamics. Mars, interior; Impact processes Abstract We derive synthetic electrical conductivity, seismic velocity, and density distributions from the results of martian mantle convection models affected by basin-forming meteorite impacts. The electrical conductivity features an intermediate minimum in the strongly depleted topmost mantle, sandwiched between higher conductivities in the lower crust and a smooth increase toward almost constant high values at depths greater than 400 km. The bulk sound speed increases mostly smoothly throughout the mantle, with only one marked change at the appearance of β-olivine near 1100 km depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Page.Pdf
    Public Disclosure Authorized _______ ;- _____ ____ - -. '-ujuLuzmmw---- Public Disclosure Authorized __________~~~ It lif't5.> fL Elf-iWEtfWIi5I------ S -~ __~_, ~ S,, _ 3111£'' ! - !'_= Public Disclosure Authorized al~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~sl .' _1EIf l i . i.5I!... ..IillWM .,,= aN N B 1. , l h~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized = r =s s s ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~foss XIe l l=4 1lill'%WYldii.Ul~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ itA=iII1 l~w 6t*t Estimating Woody Biomass in Sub-Saharan Africa Estimating Woody Biomass in Sub-Saharan Africa Andrew C. Miflington Richard W. Critdhley Terry D. Douglas Paul Ryan With contributions by Roger Bevan John Kirkby Phil O'Keefe Ian Ryle The World Bank Washington, D.C. @1994 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20433, US.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing March 1994 The findings, interpretations, and conclusiornsexpressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views and policies of the World Bank or its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The manLerialin this publication is copyrighted. Requests for permission to reproduce portions of it should be sent to the Office of the Publisher at the address shown in the copyright notice above. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally give permission promptly and, when the reproduction is for noncommnercial purposes, without asking a fee. Permission to copy portions for classroom use is granted through the CopyrightClearance Center, Inc-, Suite 910,222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, US.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Mars Telescopic Observations
    WORKSHCPON MARS TELESCOPIC OBSERVATIONS 90' 180'-;~~~~~~------------------..~~------------~~----..~o~,· 270' LPI Technical Report Number 95-04 Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPIITR--95-04 WORKSHOP ON MARS TELESCOPIC OBSERVATIONS Edited by J. F. Bell III and J. E. Moersch Held at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York August 14-15, 1995 Sponsored by Lunar and Planetary Institute Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Technical Report Number 95-04 LPIITR--95-04 Compiled in 1995 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under Contract No. NASW-4574 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This report may be cited as Bell J. F.III and Moersch J. E., eds. (1995) Workshop on Mars Telescopic Observations. LPI Tech. Rpt. 95-04, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 33 pp. This report is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost ofshipping and handling. Cover: Orbits of Mars (outer ellipse) and Earth (inner ellipse) showing oppositions of the planet from 1954to 1999. From C. Aammarion (1954) The Flammarion Book ofAstronomy, Simon and Schuster, New York. LPl Technical Report 95-04 iii Introduction The Mars Telescopic Observations Workshop, held August 14-15, 1995, at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, was organized and planned with two primary goals in mind: The first goal was to facilitate discussions among and between amateur and professional observers and to create a workshop environment fostering collaborations and comparisons within the Mars ob­ serving community.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]
  • In Pdf Format
    lós 1877 Mik 88 ge N 18 e N i h 80° 80° 80° ll T 80° re ly a o ndae ma p k Pl m os U has ia n anum Boreu bal e C h o A al m re u c K e o re S O a B Bo l y m p i a U n d Planum Es co e ria a l H y n d s p e U 60° e 60° 60° r b o r e a e 60° l l o C MARS · Korolev a i PHOTOMAP d n a c S Lomono a sov i T a t n M 1:320 000 000 i t V s a Per V s n a s l i l epe a s l i t i t a s B o r e a R u 1 cm = 320 km lkin t i t a s B o r e a a A a A l v s l i F e c b a P u o ss i North a s North s Fo d V s a a F s i e i c a a t ssa l vi o l eo Fo i p l ko R e e r e a o an u s a p t il b s em Stokes M ic s T M T P l Kunowski U 40° on a a 40° 40° a n T 40° e n i O Va a t i a LY VI 19 ll ic KI 76 es a As N M curi N G– ra ras- s Planum Acidalia Colles ier 2 + te .
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]