DOCSLIB.ORG

PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev Original language: English PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ___________________ Twenty-second meeting of the Plants Committee Tbilisi (Georgia), 19-23 October 2015 Strategic matters Cooperation with other biodiversity-related multilateral environmental agreements COOPERATION WITH THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (RESOLUTION CONF. 16.5) 1. This document has been submitted by the Representative of North America (Mr. Hesiquio Benitez) as Chair of the intersessional working group on ‘Cooperation with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation [GSPC] of the Convention on Biological Diversity [CBD] (Resolution Conf. 16.5)’, in collaboration with the Mexican Scientific Authority (CONABIO).* Background 2. At the 21st meeting of the Plants Committee (PC21, Veracruz, May 2014), Mr. Benitez introduced document PC21 Doc. 8.2 con “Cooperation with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation of the Convention on Biological Diversity (Res. Conf. 16.5)”. 3. Following consideration of document PC21 Doc. 8.2, and on the basis of the recommendations included in it, the Plants Committee: 3.1. Noted Resolution Conf. 16.5 and the “List of potential CITES activities and products and their contribution of the objectives and targets of the updated Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011- 2020” in its Annex. 3.2 Encouraged Parties to report on progress with their implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5 to the regional representatives of the Committee. 3.3. Agreed that the chair of the intersessional working group on GSPC (the representative of North America, Mr. Hesiquio Benitez), in consultation with the Secretariat, present a report at the present meeting of the Plants Committee on progress with implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5. And, 3.4. Established an intersessional working group on GSPC, with the following mandate and membership: 3.4.1 Mandate: a) Monitor compliance with the recommendations formulated by the PC at its 21st meeting regarding the implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5; and * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) – p. 1 b) Prepare a progress report for review at PC22. 3.4.2. Membership: a) Chair: Representative of North America (Mr. Benitez) b) Members: Representatives of Africa (Ms. Khayota), Asia (Mr. Fernando), Central and South America and the Caribbean (Ms. Rivera) and Oceania (Mr. Leach), and Alternate representative of Europe (Mr. Carmo); c) Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and United States of America; and d) IGOs and NGOs: UNEP-WCMC, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Botanical Gardens Conservation International and TRAFFIC International. Progress achieved by the working group 4. The working group focused on reporting the contribution to all CITES-relevant targets of the GSPC, in this sense and based on Annex of Res. Conf. 16.5, the following targets were not addressed: CITES potential contribution GSPC Target (according to Annex to Res. Conf. 16.5) 4. At least 15% of each ecological region or vegetation type Not directly applicable, as CITES works at secured through effective management and/or restoration. species level. 5. At least 75% of the most important areas for plant diversity of each ecological region protected with effective management in place for conserving plants and their genetic diversity. 6. At least 75% of production lands in each sector managed sustainably, consistent with the conservation of plant diversity. 9. 70% of the genetic diversity of crops including their wild Not directly applicable. relatives and other socio-economically valuable plant species conserved, while respecting, preserving and maintaining associated indigenous and local knowledge. 10. Effective management plans in place to prevent new biological Not directly applicable. Nevertheless, invasions and to manage important areas for plant diversity CITES Parties have recognized the link that are invaded between trade and alien invasive species in Resolution Conf. 13.10 (Rev. CoP14) on Trade in alien invasive species. 5. For all the remaining Targets (i.e. CITES-relevant GSPC targets), and in order to prepare the progress report of its mandate, on July 15th 2015 the working group consulted the Management and Scientific Authorities to all CITES Parties through the communication DGCII-322/2015, requesting them to fill in a questionnaire by August 10th 2015. 6. At the time of preparing the present document, the following 34 Parties had responded to the questionnaire: 1) Argentina 15) Italy 28) Seychelles 2) Austria 16) Jamaica 29) Slovakia 3) Brasil 17) Mexico 30) Spain 4) Bulgaria 18) Monaco 31) Switzerland 5) Chile 19) Montenegro 32) Turkey 6) Colombia 20) Montserrat 33) United Kingdom of 7) Costa Rica 21) Netherlands Great Britain and 8) Cuba 22) New Zealand Northern Ireland 9) Czech Republic 23) Norway (including 10) Denmark 24) Panama Overseas 11) Ecuador 25) Peru Territories, UKOTs) 12) Finland 26) Portugal 34) United States of 13) Greece 27) Republic of America 14) Honduras Moldova PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) – p. 2 7. Furthermore, by request of the Chair of the working group the Secretariat has prepared a report on its contribution to the implementation of Targets 1-3 and 14-16 of GSPC (Annex 4). 8. Based on the inputs derived from the consultation to Parties, as well as the report prepared by the Secretariat (Annex 4), the Chair of the working group has prepared a “Draft report of CITES contribution on the implementation of GSPC 2011-2020 (Res. Conf. 16.5)” available in Annex 3 to the present document, which also includes a preliminary assessment of CITES performance for on the implementation of each of GSPC’s Objectives. 9. It is important to note that the Chair of the GPSC Working Group found that Target 13 (Indigenous and local knowledge innovations and practices associated with plant resources, maintained or increased, as appropriate, to support customary use, sustainable livelihoods, local food security and health care) was challenging to keep track of from a CITES perspective, and for now has not been considered by the draft report (Annex 3); yet this can be reconsidered in the process of updating said report. Recommendation to the Plants Committee 10. Take note of the draft report in Annex 3 of the present document, and make recommendations to the working group aimed to improve it, and agree to present its final version for consideration of CoP17. PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) – p. 3 PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) Annex 1 PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) – p. 4 PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) – p. 5 PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) Annex 2 Questionnaire on the implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5: “Cooperation with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation [GSPC] of the Convention on Biological Diversity”1 Party: Institution: Authority: [Specify if Management Authority, Scientific Authority, or other] Contact information of the person Name who fills the questionnaire Email Phone Other: Please provide the following information: 1. Related to GSPC’s Target 1 1.1. Which of the CITES listed plants native to your country are described online*: Species Appendix Hyperlink(s) Observations *Add rows as needed 1.2. Of the species listed above, what percentage do they represent in comparison to the estimated total of the known CITES listed plants native to your country? % 2. Related to GPSC’s Targets 7 and 8 Of the total number of plant species listed under CITES’ Appendix I (approx. 360), which are currently under in situ and/or ex situ conservation schemes in your country, as follows*: Appendix I species Conservation schemes Observations In situ Ex situ [yes/no] [yes/no] *Add rows as needed 1 The present questionnaire is focused on the Targets of the GSPC 2011-2020 (https://www.cbd.int/gspc/strategy.shtml) most relevant to CITES Parties, as recognized in the Annex to Res. Conf. 16.5 (http://www.cites.org/eng/res/16/16-05.php). PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) – p. 6 3. Related to GSPC’s Target 12 Indicate which CITES plant species native to your country (and subject to international trade) are managed through sustainable use practices:* Species Appendix Non-detriment Quota Other finding (NDF) [yes/no] [yes/no] *Add rows as needed. 4. Additional remarks on the contributions of your country to the implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5: PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) – p. 7 PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) Annex 3 “Draft report on CITES contribution to the implementation of GSPC 2011-2020 (Res. Conf. 16.5)”2 The present draft is based on the information provided by the 34 Parties that responded to the questionnaire in Annex 2, and the report of the Secretariat in Annex 4. Objective I: Plant diversity is well understood, documented and recognized 1.1. Of the 34 responding Parties: a) 15 Parties reported that around 80-100% of their native CITES-listed plants have online descriptions, namely: Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia (according to the information provided by its Scientific Authority), Czech Republic, Greece, Italy, Mexico, Montserrat, Norway, Portugal, Switzerland, UK, and USA. In most of these cases, the majority of the hyperlinks provided represented national-managed online platforms. b) 2 Parties reported that around 50-70% of their native CITES-listed plants have online descriptions, these were: Finland and Peru. c) 10 Parties reported that around 0.10-25% of their native CITES listed plants have online descriptions, these were: Argentina, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pachypodium Geayi Is a Species of Pachypodium That Originated in Southwestern Madagascar
    ISLAS DE CACTUS AFRICA - AMERICA - MADAGASCAR MADAGASCAR CACTUS ISLAND Deciduous shrub armed with large and strong spines, which is capable of reaching more than 2 m in height. Erect, long and robust stems that sometimes when young twist and develop in a disorderly manner, becoming about to two bulky main stems when the plant is adult. It is characterized by barbs up to 3 cm long, silvery and arranged along and in line, covering the entire plant. Rounded leaves, thick and fleshy, intense green and appearing in a number of between 2-3 units in the same areola. The flowers are grouped into large umbels at the end of the stems, they are very small and yellowish, although it is rare to flower. Scientific name: Alluaudia procera (Drake) Drake Common name: Ocotillo of Madagascar Family: Didiereaceae Order: Caryophyllales Subclass or class: Caryophyllidae Flowering time: Place of origin: Madagascar Location: BOTANIC GARDEN Sector: Crasas Plants Habitat and Cultural Demands ALLUAUDIA PROCERA It needs very sunny exhibitions all year round. Irrigations should be measured, waiting for the substrate to dry before watering again. In winter you don't have to water it. It should be borne in mind that in its natural habitat rains occur sparsely and rarely. Uses It is grown in gardens in isolation. Its striking staff and the thorns that are arranged along its stem attract the attention of visitors to these gardens. Observations You have to be very careful in your handling for its impressive spikes, which can really do a lot of damage. Synonyms: Didierea procera Drake.
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþa N N E X E
    FACULTE DES SCIENCES DE LA NATURE ET DE LA VIE DEPARTEMENT DE BIOLOGIE THÈSE Présentée par Mme DAHANE Née ROUISSAT Lineda En vue de l’obtention du DOCTORAT EN SCIENCES BIOLOGIQUES Spécialité : Biochimie végétale appliquée. Thème : Etude des effets nématicides et molluscicides des extraits de quelques plantes sahariennes. Soutenue le : 21 Décembre 2017 Devant le jury composé de : Mr HADJADJ- AOUL Seghir, Prof. Université Oran1 ABB Président Mr BELKHODJA Moulay, Prof. UniversitéOran1, ABB Examinateur Mme BENNACEUR Malika, Prof. Université Oran1, ABB Examinatrice Mr MEKHALDI Abdelkader Prof. Université de Mostaganem, Examinateur Mr. Marouf Abderrazak. Prof. Centre. Univ. Naama Directeur de thèse Mr. Cheriti Abdelkrim Prof. Université de Béchar. Co-directeur de thèse 2016-2017 RESUME Dans le présent travail, les parties aériennes de vingt et une plantes sahariennes (21) des différentes familles botaniques (Asteraceae ; Amaranthaceae ; Rhamnaceae ; Brassicaceae ; Plumbaginaceae ; Capparidaceae ; Caryophyllaceae ; Fabaceae ; Apocynaceae ; Solanaceae ; Verbenaceae et Euphorbiacaeae) ont été utilisées pour évaluer leurs extraits aqueux (par macération ou à reflux) et les extraits organiques (acétoniques et méthanoliques avec ces fractions : hexanique, éthérique, dichlorométanolique, chloroformique, butanoliques…) pour l’activité nématicide (vis-à-vis nématodes phytoparasites à kyste : Globodera sp. et Heterodera sp. et molluscicide (vis-à-vis aux mollusques d’eau douce transporteurs des parasites : Lymnaea acumunata et Bulinus truncatus ). Les résultats sont exprimées en LC50 (taux de mortalité est égale à 50% de la population testée) par l’analyse des probits. Après l’extraction et le criblage phytochimique des extraits, l’évaluation a été réalisée sous des conditions expérimentales convenables aux cycles de vie de chaque spécimen zoologique (Température 24°C avec l’humidité et l’aération).
    [Show full text]
  • Cop17 Doc. 14.6
    Original language: English CoP17 Doc. 14.6 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September -5 October 2016 Strategic matters Cooperation with organizations and multilateral environmental agreements COOPERATION WITH THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 1. This document has been submitted by Mexico.* Background 2. At its 16th meeting (CoP16; Bangkok, 2013) the Conference of the Parties adopted Resolution Conf. 16.5 on “Cooperation with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation of the Convention on Biological Diversity”, which provides specific guidelines on GSPC-CITES collaboration by: - Inviting Parties to: a) take note of the potential contribution of CITES to the objectives and targets of the consolidated update of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020 through the activities and products listed in the Annex to the Resolution; b) promote and enhance collaboration between their GSPC focal point and their CITES Authorities, through: i. the involvement of CITES authorities in the development and implementation of the GSPC national strategies, particularly activities related to CITES-listed species; and ii. the inclusion of CITES-GSPC-related activities in CBD National Reports; - Directing the Secretariat to encourage the exchange of information related to the GSPC and other plant conservation and sustainable use initiatives, by: a)
    [Show full text]
  • Dryland Tree Data for the Southwest Region of Madagascar: Alpha-Level
    Article in press — Early view MADAGASCAR CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT VOLUME 1 3 | ISSUE 01 — 201 8 PAGE 1 ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/1 0.431 4/mcd.v1 3i1 .7 Dryland tree data for the Southwest region of Madagascar: alpha-level data can support policy decisions for conserving and restoring ecosystems of arid and semiarid regions James C. AronsonI,II, Peter B. PhillipsonI,III, Edouard Le Correspondence: Floc'hII, Tantely RaminosoaIV James C. Aronson Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 631 66-0299, USA Email: ja4201 [email protected] ABSTRACT RÉSUMÉ We present an eco-geographical dataset of the 355 tree species Nous présentons un ensemble de données éco-géographiques (1 56 genera, 55 families) found in the driest coastal portion of the sur les 355 espèces d’arbres (1 56 genres, 55 familles) présentes spiny forest-thickets of southwestern Madagascar. This coastal dans les fourrés et forêts épineux de la frange côtière aride et strip harbors one of the richest and most endangered dryland tree semiaride du Sud-ouest de Madagascar. Cette région possède un floras in the world, both in terms of overall species diversity and des assemblages d’arbres de climat sec les plus riches (en termes of endemism. After describing the biophysical and socio-eco- de diversité spécifique et d’endémisme), et les plus menacés au nomic setting of this semiarid coastal region, we discuss this re- monde. Après une description du cadre biophysique et de la situ- gion’s diverse and rich tree flora in the context of the recent ation socio-économique de cette région, nous présentons cette expansion of the protected area network in Madagascar and the flore régionale dans le contexte de la récente expansion du growing engagement and commitment to ecological restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • WRA Species Report
    Family: Euphorbiaceae Taxon: Euphorbia stenoclada Synonym: Euphorbia cirsioides Costantin & Gallaud Common Name Silver Thicket Euphorbia insulae-europae Pax Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: EVALUATE Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 3 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 y 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 ? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 y 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 n 405 Toxic
    [Show full text]
  • Cactus and Succulent Plants: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan
    Donors to the SSC Conservation Communications Programme and Cactus and Succulent Plants: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan The IUCN/Species Survival Commission is committed to communicate important species conservation information to natural resource managers, decision-makers and others whose actions affect the conservation of biodiversity. The SSC’s Action Plans, Occasional Papers, news magazine (Species), Membership Directory and other publications are supported by a wide variety of generous donors including: The Sultanate of Oman established the Peter Scott IUCN/SSC Action Plan Fund in 1990. The Fund supports Action Plan development and implementation; to date, more than 80 grants have been made from the Fund to Specialist Groups. As a result, the Action Plan Programme has progressed at an accelerated level and the network has grown and matured significantly. The SSC is grateful to the Sultanate of Oman for its confidence in and support for species conservation worldwide. The Chicago Zoological Society (CZS] provides significant in-kind and cash support to the SSC, including grants for special projects, editorial and design services, staff secondments and related support services. The mission of CZS is to help people develop a sustainable and harmonious relationship with nature. The Zoo carries out its mission by informing and inspiring 2,000,OOO annual visitors, serving as a refuge for species threatened with extinction, developing scientific approaches to manage species successfully in zoos and the wild, and working with other zoos, agencies, and protected areas around the world to conserve habitats and wildlife. The Council ofAgriculture (CO&, Taiwan has awarded major grants to the SSC’s Wildlife Trade Programme and Conservation Communications Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • P. 1 PC18 Doc. 16.1.2 CONVENTION on INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN
    PC18 Doc. 16.1.2 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________ Eighteenth meeting of the Plants Committee Buenos Aires (Argentina), 17-21 March 2009 Proposals for possible consideration at CoP15 Proposals to amend the Appendices REVIEW OF SUCCULENT EUPHORBIA SPP. IN APPENDIX II 1. This document has been submitted by Switzerland as chair of the intersessional working group co-ordinating and monitoring the Periodic Review (PC17 WG5)*. Background 2. The listing of “Euphorbia spp.” in Appendix II came into effect on 1 July 1975. It is annotated with #1 [Designates all parts and derivatives, except: a) seeds, spores and pollen (including pollinia); b) seedling or tissue cultures obtained in vitro, in solid or liquid media, transported in sterile containers; and c) cut flowers of artificially propagated plants]. Non-succulent species of Euphorbia were excluded from CITES provisions effective 18 September 1997. However, there were concerns about inconsistent interpretation and implementation problems among Parties because there was no clear definition of the term ‘succulent.’ Therefore, the CITES Checklist of Succulent Euphorbia Taxa (Carter & Eggli, 1997) was established as a reference. As many new succulent Euphorbia species had been described in a variety of botanical journals, it was decided at the 12th meeting of the Plants Committee, to update this Checklist. The 2nd edition (Carter & Eggli, 2003) was adopted as a reference (CoP13 Bangkok, 2004). The Checklist now contains ca. 900 names of accepted taxa of succulent Euphorbia, including species and subspecific taxa. A number of cultivars have been excluded from CITES: E. trigona Miller (18/09/97), E.
    [Show full text]
  • Madagascar 2013 Trip Report Wildlife Tour Birdwatching
    Madagascar A Unique Natural Heritage A Greentours Tour Report 31st October to 14th November 2014 Led by Callan Cohen & Paul Cardy Daily report and systematic lists by Paul Cardy Day 1 Friday 31st October and Saturday 1st November Arrival, Antananarivo Our hotel was situated amid a rare oasis of greenery in Antananarivo. Arrivals this year were many and varied, some of us arriving on the Friday, others on Saturday. The hotel gardens produced a reasonable selection of wildlife for those of us spending time here. A hawk moth was a pleasing find and among the butterflies were Papilio demodocus, Catopsilia florella, Mylothris phileris, Leptomyrina phidias, Uranothauma artemenes, Leptotes rabefaner, Junonia goudotii, Junonia rhadama, Acraea igati, and Acraea zitja; not a bad haul. All the group were united by lunch time on the Saturday, and that afternoon we made a trip to a small wetland reserve in the Tana environs. This was a pleasant and productive excursion. On arrival at the reserve a colony of Nephila spiders was the first thing of note. Here were many egrets including Dimorphic and Great, Black-crowned Night Herons, Black Heron, several Squacco Herons, and Malagasy Pond Heron. On the water were numerous Red-billed Teal, several Hottentot Teal, numerous White-faced Whistling Duck, and Comb Duck. Some eight of the endemic Meller’s Duck was a highlight. A Lygodactylus was not identified to species. Among Odonata were Ischnura senegalensis, and Brachythemis leucosticta, Banded Groundling. Zizeeria knysna flew over the low vegetation and the beautiful Precis rhadama was admired. Birds continued with Madagascar Kingfisher, Madagascar Coucal, and Common Jery, and White- throated Rail crossed the path.
    [Show full text]
  • AC24 Doc. 7.2
    AC24 Doc. 7.2 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ___________________ Twenty-fourth meeting of the Animals Committee Geneva, (Switzerland), 20-24 April 2009 Review of Significant Trade in specimens of Appendix-II species OVERVIEW OF THE SPECIES-BASED REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE 1. This document has been prepared by the Secretariat. 2. Resolution Conf. 12.8 (Rev. CoP13) on Review of Significant Trade in specimens of Appendix-II species directs the Secretariat, for the purpose of monitoring and facilitating the implementation of that Resolution and the relevant paragraphs of Article IV, "to report at each meeting of the Animals or Plants Committee on the implementation by the range States concerned of the recommendations made by the Committee". The Secretariat, in consultation with the Chair of the Animals Committee, has to determine whether recommendations made under the Review of Significant Trade have been implemented by the range States and to report to the Standing Committee, which decides on appropriate action. The present document therefore contains information on recent decisions of the Standing Committee in the context of the Review of Significant Trade, and gives brief updates on ongoing reviews. Species selected before 2000 3. Paragraph v) of Resolution Conf. 12.8 (Rev. CoP13) states that: the Standing Committee, in consultation with the Secretariat and the Chairman of the Animals or Plants Committee, shall review recommendations to suspend trade that have been in place for longer than two years and, if appropriate, take measures to address the situation. 4. In accordance with this paragraph, the Secretariat commissioned a study to review such recommendations to suspend trade established prior to September 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Name
    RANOBE MINE PROJECT, SOUTHWEST REGION, MADAGASCAR VOLUME 9: FAUNAL BASELINE ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Prepared by: World Titanium Resources Ltd Prof. William R. Branch 15 Lovegrove Close, Bayworld Mount Claremont P.O. Box 13147, Western Australia Humewood 6010 Port Elizabeth 6013 South Africa January 2013 Faunal Baseline Assessment – January 2013 This Report should be cited as follows: Branch, W.R., January 2013, Toliara Sands Project - Faunal Baseline Assessment (Update of 2007 Report), prepared for Coastal and Environmental Services, Grahamstown. Coastal & Environmental Services i Ranobe Mine Project Faunal Baseline Assessment – January 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Project Background World Titanium Resources Ltd (WTR) proposed Mine Site plans to mine the Ranobe mineral sand deposit for the heavy minerals ilmenite, rutile and zircon. These minerals will be extracted with dry mining operation. This report: 1. Comment on current trends and changes in faunal biodiversity, by reviewing available literature to update the 2007 report. 2. Specifically assesses the impacts of the revised project including the haul road options, the pipeline options and the jetty, on local fauna. METHODOLOGY No fieldwork was involved and Branch (2007) forms the primary data for this review, upgraded by reference to subsequent published literature and to online sources to produce a stand-alone report. Species of Special Concern (SSC) included sensitive species (e.g. endemic), threatened species (listed in the IUCN Red Lists), and species in International Trade (CITES). This updated assessment is based only on published data. Potential threats associated with the current land use as well as the direct impacts from mining and product transport and the MSP location have been assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of the Euphorbiaceae
    CLASSIFICATION OF THE GradyL. Webster2 EUPHORBIACEAE' ABSTRACT The familyEuphorbiaceae appears to be monophyletic,despite proposals for segregate families. The Euphorbiaceae displaya greatvariety of growthforms, including at least 17 "models" of Hallk. Anatomicalcharacters particularly usefulfor classificationinclude wood structure,laticifer type, trichomes, and stomata.Inflorescences are basically dichasial,and pseudanthiahave evolved several times. Pollen nuclear numberand exine structureprovide useful criteriafor characterizing genera, tribes, and subfamilies.Structure of the seed coat is characteristicfor the family and does not provideevidence for a polyphyleticorigin of the family.Pollination is prevailinglyentomophilous, and seed dispersalby ants is importantin manytaxa. Geographicdistribution patterns of generashow a concentrationof primitivetaxa in Africaand Madagascar,although in subfamilyCrotonoideae there is evidenceof a neotropicalcenter. Disjunctionsbetween Africa and South Americaare common.Bentham's hypothesis of an Old World originof the familyappears well supported.The basic distributionpatterns appear to reflectearly (Cretaceousand Paleogene) dispersalacross land or narrowwater barriers and spectacularbut rathertrivial instances of long-distancedispersal in the late Tertiaryand Pleistocene;Tertiary high-latitude dispersals via the Beringland bridgeappear to have been relativelyinsignificant. The Euphorbiaceae, although one of the largest uninformative about relationships, and the later dicot familiesand conspicuous throughoutthe
    [Show full text]
  • Samata) SUR LE PLATEAU MAHAFALY (SUD-OUEST DE MADAGASCAR)
    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES DEPARTEMENT DE BIOLOGIE ET ECOLOGIE VEGETALES Mémoire pour l’obtention du Diplôme d’Etudes Approfondies (DEA) en Sciences de la Vie Option : Ecologie Végétale REPRODUCTION ET PRODUCTION DE BIOMASSE D’Euphorbia stenoclada Baill. (Samata) SUR LE PLATEAU MAHAFALY (SUD-OUEST DE MADAGASCAR) Présenté par RABEMIRINDRA Herinavalona Andriatomady (Maître ès-Sciences) Soutenu publiquement le 31 Mars 2015 Devant le jury composé de: Président : Pr. Bakolimalala RAKOUTH Rapporteur : Pr. Vonjison RAKOTOARIMANANA Examinateur : Dr. Edmond ROGER UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES DEPARTEMENT DE BIOLOGIE ET ECOLOGIE VEGETALES ……………………………………………………………… Mémoire pour l’obtention du diplôme d’études approfondies (D.E.A) en Sciences de la Vie Option : Ecologie Végétale REPRODUCTION ET PRODUCTION DE BIOMASSE D’Euphorbia stenoclada Baill. (Samata) SUR LE PLATEAU MAHAFALY (SUD-OUEST DE MADAGASCAR) Présenté par RABEMIRINDRA Herinavalona Andriatomady (Maître ès-Sciences) Soutenu publiquement le 31 Mars 2015 Président : Professeur Bakolimalala RAKOUTH Rapporteur : Professeur Vonjison RAKOTOARIMANANA Examinateur : Docteur Edmond ROGER Remerciements REMERCIEMENTS Ce travail est le fruit de la collaboration entre le Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales (DBEV) de la Faculté des Sciences de l’Université d’Antananarivo et de l’Université de Kassel (Allemagne). Il a pu être mené à terme grâce au financement octroyé par le Bundes Ministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) dans le cadre du projet Sustainable Land Management (SuLaMa). Nous remercions tous ceux qui ont contribué à la réalisation de ce mémoire, en particulier à : Madame Bakolimalala RAKOUTH, Professeur au sein du Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales, Faculté des Sciences, Université d’Antananarivo, qui, malgré ses multiples engagements, a accepté d’être le président de jury de ce mémoire.
    [Show full text]