Cop17 Doc. 14.6

Original language: English CoP17 Doc. 14.6

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ______

Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September -5 October 2016

Strategic matters

Cooperation with organizations and multilateral environmental agreements

COOPERATION WITH THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

1. This document has been submitted by Mexico.*

Background

2. At its 16th meeting (CoP16; Bangkok, 2013) the Conference of the Parties adopted Resolution Conf. 16.5 on “Cooperation with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation of the Convention on Biological Diversity”, which provides specific guidelines on GSPC-CITES collaboration by:

- Inviting Parties to: a) take note of the potential contribution of CITES to the objectives and targets of the consolidated update of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020 through the activities and products listed in the Annex to the Resolution; b) promote and enhance collaboration between their GSPC focal point and their CITES Authorities, through: i. the involvement of CITES authorities in the development and implementation of the GSPC national strategies, particularly activities related to CITES-listed species; and ii. the inclusion of CITES-GSPC-related activities in CBD National Reports; - Directing the Secretariat to encourage the exchange of information related to the GSPC and other plant conservation and sustainable use initiatives, by: a) promoting awareness of ongoing CITES activities that contribute to the achievement of GSPC Targets, by communicating information among CITES bodies and Parties on the operations and outcomes of CITES processes, such as the Review of Significant Trade, Periodic Review of the Appendices, proposals to amend the CITES Appendices, and formulation of Non-detriment Findings (NDFs), among others; b) collaborating with the CBD Secretariat to streamline reporting on relevant CITES activities related to the GSPC Targets; c) including the GSPC in any work plans developed under the Memorandum of Cooperation with the Secretariat of CBD; and d) inviting a CBD representative to participate as an observer at Plants Committee meetings that address GSPC; - Directing the Plants Committee and the Secretariat to promote CITES collaboration with CBD on the implementation of the GSPC by: a) representing the CITES Plants Committee at meetings of CBD’s Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) and other GSPC meetings subject to the availability of external funding; and

* The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author.

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 1 b) providing contributions for CBD documents regarding the implementation of the GSPC.

3. At its 21st meeting (PC21; Veracruz, México 2014), the Plants Committee considered document PC21 Doc. 8.2, presented by the (then) interim Vice Chair of the Plants Committee (Hesiquio Benítez, México) and prepared in collaboration with the Mexican Scientific Authority (Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, CONABIO). As a result, and on the basis of the recommendations of the document, the Plants Committee: 3.1. Took note of Res. Conf. 16.5, and in particular the “List of potential CITES activities and products and their contribution to the objectives and targets of the updated Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020” included in its Annex; 3.2. Encouraged Parties to report any progress related to the implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5 to the regional representatives of the Plants Committtee; 3.3. Established an intersessional working group on GSPC, as follows: a) Mandate: i. Monitor compliance with the recommendations formulated by PC21 regarding the implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5; and, ii. Prepare a progress report for review at PC22. b) Membership: i. Chair: Representative of North America (Mr. Benítez) ii. Members: Representatives of Africa (Ms. Khayota), Asia (Mr. Fernando), Central and South America and the Caribbean (Ms. Rivera) and Oceania (Mr. Leach), and Alternate representative of Europe (Mr. Carmo). iii. Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and United States of America. iv. IGOs and NGOs: UNEP-WCMC, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Botanical Gardens Conservation International, and TRAFFIC International.

4. At the 22nd meeting of the Plants Committee (PC22; Tbilisi, Georgia 2015), the working group presented the progress achieved, through document PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2), submitted by the Representative of North America (Mr. Benítez) in collaboration with the Mexican Scientific Authority (CONABIO), highlighting the following sections of the document: a) Annex 3, consisting of a “Draft report on CITES contribution to the implementation of GSPC 2011- 2020 (Res. Conf. 16.5)”, which represents a preliminary qualitative assessment of CITES performance in the implementation of all 5 GSPC Objectives. The methodology followed by the working group to achieve the draft report is detailed at length in document PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2), and it is mainly based on the input provided by 34 Parties in response to a consultation process described in Annex 1 of that document. b) Annex 4 consisting of a detailed “Overview of the Secretariat’s capacity building materials with emphasis on the activities related to GSPC and Resolution Conf. 16”. Particularly, said Annex 4 included a Table which summarizes Periodic Review proposals and Review of Significant Trade in Specimens of Appendix-II species since CoP13 to the 21st meeting of the Plants Committee (PC21, 2014). c) Annex 5, an Excel file consisting of the entire online flora reported by the 34 CITES Parties responded to the working group’s consultations in preparation for PC22; currently available at https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/pc/22/E-PC22-07-02-Annex5-Rev2.xlsx

5. Based on the recommendations of document PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2), the Plants Committee: a) Took note of the “Draft report on CITES contribution to the implementation of GSPC 2011-2020 (Res. Conf. 16.5)” (contained in ANNEX 1 to the present document); b) Requested the Secretariat to publish on its website the summary on Periodic Review proposals and Review of Significant Trade updated until PC21 (contained in ANNEX 2 of the present document); and, c) Encouraged Parties to provide information on the implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5, in order to prepare an updated version of the draft report for consideration of the 17th meeting of the Conference of the Parties.

6. In order to update the information contained in the Draft Report (ANNEX 1), the Plants Committee (through the interim Vice Chair, Ms. Adrianne Sinclair) requested the Secretariat to publish a Notification to the Parties, encouraging to fill in a questionnaire based on that originally included in Annex 2 to document PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2). At the time of preparing the present document, the Notification was yet to be published, and the feedback and responses received to it will be included in an revised version of ANNEX 1 of the present document (Draft report on the contribution to the implementation of GSPC 2011-2020).

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 2 Recommendations to the Conference of the Parties

7. Endorse the updated version of ANNEX 1 of the present document (which will include all responses received to the Notification mentioned in par. 6), and request the Secretariat to send it to the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, in order for it to be considered at CBD’s 13th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP13-CBD, Cancun, México; December 2016) as CITES contribution to the implementation of GSPC 2011-2020.

8. Request the Secretariat to:

a) Publish and maintained updated on its website the summary contained in ANNEX 2 of the present document (Periodic Review proposals submitted to CoPs for amendments to Appendices I and II, taxa selected for Periodic Review of species included in App. I and II, and Review of Significant Trade in specimens of App. II species), including relevant updates derived from PC22 and CoP17;

b) Request the UNEP-WCMC (United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre) to include in its website an interactive version of the online flora, currently available at https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/pc/22/E-PC22-07-02-Annex5-Rev2.xlsx , in such a way that CITES Parties can maintain it up to date, and thus have a clear idea on CITES contribution to the implementation of Target 1 of the GSPC.

COMMENTS FROM THE SECRETARIAT

A. The Secretariat supports the cooperation with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), as directed in Resolution Conf. 16.5. The document explains that this cooperation has mainly consisted of providing the CBD with updates on various CITES review processes concerning selected plant species (Periodic Review of the Appendices; Review of Significant Trade), and information on plant-related activities conducted by the Parties and the Secretariat that are or may be relevant to GSPC’s objectives. The document seeks agreement from the Conference of the Parties to continue this delivery of information to the GSPC.

B. The Secretariat notes that to date, there seem to have been only limited opportunities for GSPC to inform CITES of relevant activities, or bring information on plant conservation and sustainable use initiatives involving CITES-listed species to the attention of the Parties.

C. The Secretariat suggests that the Conference of the Parties agrees to the recommendation in paragraph 7 of the document, as it may contribute to discussions on the GSPC at CBD’s 13th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP13-CBD, Cancun, December 2016).

D. The implementation of the recommendation in paragraph 8 a) would have cost implications for the Secretariat. It requests the Secretariat to maintain on its website updated information on proposals submitted to amend Appendices I and II, the Periodic Review and the Review of Significant Trade as far as flora is concerned. The most practical and effective way of keeping the required information up to date involves the creation of a database. This would cost around USD 10,000 in consultancies, for which external funds would have to be secured. The Secretariat has provided further comments on the estimated costs for establishing databases for the Review of Significant Trade process and the Periodic Review process in documents CoP17 Doc. 33 and CoP17 Doc. 82.1 respectively.

E. Regarding the recommendation in paragraph 8 b), the Secretariat would encourage the Conference of the Parties to seek comments from UNEP-WCMC regarding the feasibility and cost for undertaking the proposed activity.

F. Finally, the Secretariat would like to bring to the attention of Parties that the Notification mentioned in paragraph 6 has been published and can be found on the CITES website as Notification No. 2016/046.

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 3 CoP17 Doc. 14.6 Annex 1

“Draft report on CITES contribution to the implementation of GSPC 2011-2020” Last updated: October 2015

The present draft is based on the information provided by the 34 Parties that responded to the questionnaire in Annex 2 of PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2), and the report of the Secretariat in Annex 4 of PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2).

Objective I: Plant diversity is well understood, documented and recognized 1.1. Of the 34 responding Parties: a) 15 Parties reported that around 80-100% of their native CITES-listed plants have online descriptions, namely: Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia (according to the information provided by its Scientific Authority), Czech Republic, Greece, Italy, Mexico, Montserrat, Norway, Portugal, Switzerland, UK, and USA. In most of these cases, the majority of the hyperlinks provided represented national-managed online platforms. b) 2 Parties reported that around 50-70% of their native CITES-listed plants have online descriptions, these were: Finland and Peru. c) 10 Parties reported that around 0.10-25% of their native CITES listed plants have online descriptions, these were: Argentina, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Honduras, Panamá, Republic of Moldova, 1) Target 1: Seychelles, Spain, and Montenegro. An online flora of all known plants The links on the species with online descriptions (according to Parties responses) can be consulted in the spreadsheet in Annex 5 of PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2), available at: https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/pc/22/E-PC22-07-02-Annex5-Rev2.xlsx 1.2. Furthermore (as provided by the Secretariat), CITES has the following publications or checklists available: a) Checklist of CITES Species– 2013: http://checklist.cites.org/#/en b) CITES Wiki Identification Manual: https://www.cites.org/eng/resources/wiki_id.php c) Kew Garden CITES references for plants: http://www.kew.org/data/cites.html d) Piante Grasse - (publication of the “Associazione Italiana Amatori delle piante Succulente”) – Volume 9 e) Piante Grasse - Volume 12 f) Species+ Database: http://www.speciesplus.net/

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 4 According to the Secretariat’s report, since CoP13 to the date: a) 36 Appendix I species have been selected under the Periodic Review of the Appendices process (PR), of which: 5 have completed reviews (with a PC document to support with the supporting statement); and 31 have ongoing reviews (which include 7 species of Sclerocactus spp., with the results of the PR to be presented for consideration of the present meeting of the Plants Committee [PC22, Georgia 2015]). b) 69 Appendix II species have been selected under the PR, of which: 8 have completed reviews (whether a decision to retain, amend their listings) with a PC document or amendment proposal with the supporting statement; 1 review was suspended; and the remaining 60 are ongoing (including 7 species of Sclerocactus spp. with the results of the PR to be presented for consideration of PC22). 2) Target 2: c) During the reported period, 118 plant species have been under review by the Significant Trade process (ST), An assessment of the conservation status of all of them with results recorded in PC working documents. all known plant species, as far as possible, d) A total of 95 plant taxa have been the target of a successfully adopted amendment proposal, as follows: 16 to guide conservation action correspond to amendment proposals related solely to annotations (amendment of existing annotations, or merging thereof, inclusion of certain populations in App. II); 1 resulted in the deletion from App. I; 34 resulted in the deletion from Ap. II; 1 resulted in the transfer from Appendix II to I; 3 resulted in the transfer from Appendix I to II; 40 resulted in the inclusion under Appendix II. Furthermore, the UNEP-WCMC trade database represents one of the main sources of information, that serves as the basis of the analysis that guide the decision making processes for CITES plant listed species, mainly: Significant Trade (Res. Conf. 12.8 [Rev. CoP13]), Periodic Review (Res. Conf. 14.8 [Rev. CoP16]), Amendments to the Appendices (Res. Conf. 9.24 [Rev. CoP16)].

3) Target 3: Information, research and associated outputs, and methods necessary to implement the Strategy developed and shared

Preliminary assessment of CITES Good performance in contributing to Objective I:

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 5

Objective II: Plant diversity is urgently and effectively conserved Regarding the approximately 300 plant species currently listed in Appendix I (an based solely on the 34 responding Parties): 7) Target 7: a) Around 34 plant taxa are currently protected under in situ conservation schemes in any of the following 13 At least 75 per cent of known threatened countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Finland, Italy, Mexico, Panamá, Peru, UK, plant species conserved in situ. and USA. b) Furthermore, 5 Parties mentioned having no native Appendix I species in their countries: Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Montserrat, and Norway. 8) Target 8: Similarly, regarding the approximately 300 plant species currently listed in Appendix I, around 33 taxa are At least 75 per cent of threatened plant currently known to be protected under ex situ conservation schemes in any of the following 13 countries: Chile, species in ex situ collections, preferably in Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Finland, Greece, Italy, México, Monaco, Panamá, Peru, and the UK. the country of origin, and at least 20 per cent available for recovery and restoration programmes. Preliminary assessment of CITES Perfectible performance in contributing to Objective II:

Objective III: Plant diversity is used in a sustainable and equitable manner 11.1. Listings under CITES Appendices (https://cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php), applicable to the 180 Parties to the Convention: a) Approximately 300 plant species are currently listed under Appendix I of CITES. Their trade is regulated by the applicable provisions of the Convention, in particular: Art. III (and other related Resolutions and Decisions; particularly Res. Conf. 16.7 on non-detriment findings, or NDFs). 11) Target 11: b) Approximately 29,600 plant species are listed under Appendix II of CITES. Their trade is regulated by No species of wild flora endangered by the applicable provisions of the Convention, in particular: Art. IV (and other related Resolutions and international trade Decisions; particularly Res. Conf. 16.7 on non-detriment findings, or NDFs). c) Approximately 12 plant species are listed under Appendix III of CITES. Their trade is regulated by the applicable provisions of the Convention, in particular: Art. V (and other related Resolutions and Decisions). 11.2. Furthermore, all the information reported under this Annex contributes to the implementation of Target 11.

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 6 a) Of the 34 responding Parties, 11 specifically mentioned that under their domestic legislation, all Appendix I and II CITES listed species are subject to the Conventions provisions related to the formulation of non- detriment findings (NDFs) in compliance with the provisions of Arts. II and IV of the Convention, as well as Res. Conf. 16.7; most of them specified that the formulation of NDFs is made on a case by case basis. This, in addition to the domestic measures set in place which might include the implementation of stricter measures. These Parties were: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, UK, and USA. b) Similarly, 6 countries explicitly mentioned the establishment of quotas for a total of around 400 Appendix I and II taxa. These countries were: Bulgaria, Colombia, Ecuador, Jamaica, Peru, and Republic of Moldova. However this might represent a strong underestimation of CITES plant species with established quotas at a national level. c) Furthermore, CITES website hosts sections to aid compliance to its provisions, such as: 12) Target 12: All wild harvested plant-based products sourced sustainably.  NDF Section, where Parties can find the most updated information and guidance on the formulation of NDFs for species listed under Appendices I and II: https://cites.org/eng/prog/ndf/index.php

 The 2015 national export quotas available at: https://cites.org/sites/default/files/common/quotas/2015/ExportQuotas2015.pdf d) Regarding the regulation of main specimens in trade, there are around 15 annotations in the Appendices relevant to plant species, which are focused on regulating the main specimens in trade.

Preliminary assessment of CITES Good performance in contributing to Objective III:

Objective IV: Education and awareness about plant diversity, its role in sustainable livelihoods and importance to all life on earth is promoted 14) Target 14: The importance of plant diversity On the CITES Virtual College Parties can find courses, reference materials and training slides that, although no and the need for its conservation specific to flora, can provide a strong platform to train Parties on how CITES works. incorporated into communication, education and public awareness programmes. 15) Target 15: The number of trained people working with appropriate facilities sufficient according to national needs, to achieve the targets of this Strategy. Preliminary assessment of CITES Perfectible performance in contributing to Objective IV:

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 7

Objective V: The capacities and public engagement necessary to implement the Strategy have been developed 16) Target 16: Institutions, networks and Although the CITES Secretariat has formalized the cooperation with numerous institutions, international partnerships for plant conservation organizations and multilateral environmental agreements, the existing MoUs do not focus on flora matters only. established or strengthened at national, They address general cooperation for all CITES species (animals and plants) or for animal species and, none of regional and international levels to achieve them is specific for plant species. the targets of this Strategy. Preliminary assessment of CITES Perfectible performance in contributing to Objective V:

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 8 CoP17 Doc. 14.6 Annex 2

“Periodic Review proposals submitted to CoPs for amendments to Appendices I and II (Article XV of the Convention), taxa selected for Periodic Review of species included in Appendices I and II [Resolution Conf. 14.8 (Rev. CoP16)] and Review of Significant Trade in specimens of Appendix-II species [Resolution Conf. 12 (Rev. CoP13)] since CoP13 to PC21”

Periodic Review Sig. Trade status and Review Amendment Per. Review 1 Amendment recommendation and PC Higher taxa Genus / Species App proposal submitted record Proposal [para j /Res. mtg to CoP document (Conf.14.8 selecting Rev. CoP16)] taxa

ANACARDIACEAE Operculicarya decaryi II Inclusion in App. II CoP15 Prop. 22 no no

Operculicarya decaryi II Inclusion in App. II CoP16 Prop. 51 no no

Operculicarya hyphaenoides II Inclusion in App. II CoP15 Prop. 23 no no

Operculicarya pachypus II Inclusion in App. II CoP15 Prop. 24 no no

APOCYNACEAE Hoodia spp. II Inclusion in App. II CoP 13 Prop 37 no no Amendment of

Hoodia spp. II CoP16 Prop. 52 no no annotation 2

Hoodia gordonii II no PC21

Pachypodium bispinosum II no PC15 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pachypodium brevicaule II CoP 15 & CoP17. no

19.1 Review ongoing.

Pachypodium namaquanum II no PC19

Pachypodium succulentum II no PC15

1 CITES listing in July 2015 2 Hyperlinks attached to the species names are linked to the Review of Significant Trade Management System

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 9 Periodic Review Sig. Trade status and Review Amendment Per. Review 1 Amendment recommendation and PC Higher taxa Genus / Species App proposal submitted record Proposal [para j /Res. mtg to CoP document (Conf.14.8 selecting Rev. CoP16)] taxa

Rauvolfia serpentina II no PC15

AGAVACEAE Selected between PC21 Doc.

Agave arizonica not listed Deletion from App. I CoP14 Prop. 22 CoP13 & 15. no

19.1 Review stopped. Selected between CoP13 & 15, PC21 Doc. Agave parviflora I no

Retain in 19.1 Appendix I Selected between CoP13 & 15, PC21 Doc. Agave victoriae-reginae II no

Retain in 19.1 Appendix II Selected between Transfer from App. I CoP13&CoP15. PC21 Doc.

Nolina interrata II CoP14 Prop. 23 no

to App. II Proposal at 19.1 CoP14

Yucca queretaroensis II Inclusion in App. II CoP16 Prop. 50 no no

AMARYLLIDACEAE Galanthus elwesii no PC21 ARALIACEAE Panax ginseng and Panax Amendment of the

II CoP16 Prop. 53 no no quinquefolius annotation BROMELIACEAE Selected between CoP13 & CoP16. PC21 Doc. Tillandsia harrisii II no

Present listing in 19.1 II appropriate. Selected between PC21 Doc.

Tillandsia kautskyi not listed Deletion from App. II CoP16 Prop. 54 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 10 Periodic Review Sig. Trade status and Review Amendment Per. Review 1 Amendment recommendation and PC Higher taxa Genus / Species App proposal submitted record Proposal [para j /Res. mtg to CoP document (Conf.14.8 selecting Rev. CoP16)] taxa

Selected between CoP13& CoP15 PC21 Doc. Tillandsia kammii II yes and reselected no

19.1 between CoP15 & CoP17 Selected between CoP13& CoP15 PC21 Doc. Tillandsia mauryana II yes and reselected no

19.1 between CoP15 & CoP17 Selected between CoP13&CoP15. PC21 Doc.

Tillandsia sprengeliana not listed Deletion from App. II CoP16 Prop. 55 no

Proposal at 19.1 CoP16 Selected between CoP13&CoP15. PC21 Doc.

Tillandsia sucrei not listed Deletion from App. II CoP16 Prop. 56 no

Proposal at 19.1 CoP16 CACTACEAE CACTACEAE spp. and all Delete annotations

II CoP15 Prop. 25 no no taxa with annotation #1 #1 and #4

Carnegiea gigantea II no PC21 Pereskia spp. and

not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop. 24 no no Quiabentia spp. Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia aculeate not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia aureiflora not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1

Pereskia bahiensis not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 Selected between PC21 Doc. no

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 11 Periodic Review Sig. Trade status and Review Amendment Per. Review 1 Amendment recommendation and PC Higher taxa Genus / Species App proposal submitted record Proposal [para j /Res. mtg to CoP document (Conf.14.8 selecting Rev. CoP16)] taxa

CoP13& CoP15 19.1

Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia bleo not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia diaz-romeroana not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia grandifolia not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia guamacho not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia horrida not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia lychnidiflora not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia marcanoi not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia nemorosa not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia portulacifolia not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia quisqueyana not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia sacarosa not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia stenantha not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1

CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 12 Periodic Review Sig. Trade status and Review Amendment Per. Review 1 Amendment recommendation and PC Higher taxa Genus / Species App proposal submitted record Proposal [para j /Res. mtg to CoP document (Conf.14.8 selecting Rev. CoP16)] taxa

Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia weberiana not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1 Selected between PC21 Doc. Pereskia zinniiflora not listed Deletion from App. II CoP14 Prop.24 no

CoP13& CoP15 19.1

Pereskiopsis spp. not listed Deletion from App.II CoP14 Prop. 25 no no Selected between PC21 Doc.

Pereskiopsis aquosa not listed Deletion from App.II CoP14 Prop. 25 no