DOCSLIB.ORG

Cop17 Doc. 14.6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cop17 Doc. 14.6 Original language: English CoP17 Doc. 14.6 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September -5 October 2016 Strategic matters Cooperation with organizations and multilateral environmental agreements COOPERATION WITH THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 1. This document has been submitted by Mexico.* Background 2. At its 16th meeting (CoP16; Bangkok, 2013) the Conference of the Parties adopted Resolution Conf. 16.5 on “Cooperation with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation of the Convention on Biological Diversity”, which provides specific guidelines on GSPC-CITES collaboration by: - Inviting Parties to: a) take note of the potential contribution of CITES to the objectives and targets of the consolidated update of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020 through the activities and products listed in the Annex to the Resolution; b) promote and enhance collaboration between their GSPC focal point and their CITES Authorities, through: i. the involvement of CITES authorities in the development and implementation of the GSPC national strategies, particularly activities related to CITES-listed species; and ii. the inclusion of CITES-GSPC-related activities in CBD National Reports; - Directing the Secretariat to encourage the exchange of information related to the GSPC and other plant conservation and sustainable use initiatives, by: a) promoting awareness of ongoing CITES activities that contribute to the achievement of GSPC Targets, by communicating information among CITES bodies and Parties on the operations and outcomes of CITES processes, such as the Review of Significant Trade, Periodic Review of the Appendices, proposals to amend the CITES Appendices, and formulation of Non-detriment Findings (NDFs), among others; b) collaborating with the CBD Secretariat to streamline reporting on relevant CITES activities related to the GSPC Targets; c) including the GSPC in any work plans developed under the Memorandum of Cooperation with the Secretariat of CBD; and d) inviting a CBD representative to participate as an observer at Plants Committee meetings that address GSPC; - Directing the Plants Committee and the Secretariat to promote CITES collaboration with CBD on the implementation of the GSPC by: a) representing the CITES Plants Committee at meetings of CBD’s Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) and other GSPC meetings subject to the availability of external funding; and * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 1 b) providing contributions for CBD documents regarding the implementation of the GSPC. 3. At its 21st meeting (PC21; Veracruz, México 2014), the Plants Committee considered document PC21 Doc. 8.2, presented by the (then) interim Vice Chair of the Plants Committee (Hesiquio Benítez, México) and prepared in collaboration with the Mexican Scientific Authority (Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, CONABIO). As a result, and on the basis of the recommendations of the document, the Plants Committee: 3.1. Took note of Res. Conf. 16.5, and in particular the “List of potential CITES activities and products and their contribution to the objectives and targets of the updated Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020” included in its Annex; 3.2. Encouraged Parties to report any progress related to the implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5 to the regional representatives of the Plants Committtee; 3.3. Established an intersessional working group on GSPC, as follows: a) Mandate: i. Monitor compliance with the recommendations formulated by PC21 regarding the implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5; and, ii. Prepare a progress report for review at PC22. b) Membership: i. Chair: Representative of North America (Mr. Benítez) ii. Members: Representatives of Africa (Ms. Khayota), Asia (Mr. Fernando), Central and South America and the Caribbean (Ms. Rivera) and Oceania (Mr. Leach), and Alternate representative of Europe (Mr. Carmo). iii. Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and United States of America. iv. IGOs and NGOs: UNEP-WCMC, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Botanical Gardens Conservation International, and TRAFFIC International. 4. At the 22nd meeting of the Plants Committee (PC22; Tbilisi, Georgia 2015), the working group presented the progress achieved, through document PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2), submitted by the Representative of North America (Mr. Benítez) in collaboration with the Mexican Scientific Authority (CONABIO), highlighting the following sections of the document: a) Annex 3, consisting of a “Draft report on CITES contribution to the implementation of GSPC 2011- 2020 (Res. Conf. 16.5)”, which represents a preliminary qualitative assessment of CITES performance in the implementation of all 5 GSPC Objectives. The methodology followed by the working group to achieve the draft report is detailed at length in document PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2), and it is mainly based on the input provided by 34 Parties in response to a consultation process described in Annex 1 of that document. b) Annex 4 consisting of a detailed “Overview of the Secretariat’s capacity building materials with emphasis on the activities related to GSPC and Resolution Conf. 16”. Particularly, said Annex 4 included a Table which summarizes Periodic Review proposals and Review of Significant Trade in Specimens of Appendix-II species since CoP13 to the 21st meeting of the Plants Committee (PC21, 2014). c) Annex 5, an Excel file consisting of the entire online flora reported by the 34 CITES Parties responded to the working group’s consultations in preparation for PC22; currently available at https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/pc/22/E-PC22-07-02-Annex5-Rev2.xlsx 5. Based on the recommendations of document PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2), the Plants Committee: a) Took note of the “Draft report on CITES contribution to the implementation of GSPC 2011-2020 (Res. Conf. 16.5)” (contained in ANNEX 1 to the present document); b) Requested the Secretariat to publish on its website the summary on Periodic Review proposals and Review of Significant Trade updated until PC21 (contained in ANNEX 2 of the present document); and, c) Encouraged Parties to provide information on the implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5, in order to prepare an updated version of the draft report for consideration of the 17th meeting of the Conference of the Parties. 6. In order to update the information contained in the Draft Report (ANNEX 1), the Plants Committee (through the interim Vice Chair, Ms. Adrianne Sinclair) requested the Secretariat to publish a Notification to the Parties, encouraging to fill in a questionnaire based on that originally included in Annex 2 to document PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2). At the time of preparing the present document, the Notification was yet to be published, and the feedback and responses received to it will be included in an revised version of ANNEX 1 of the present document (Draft report on the contribution to the implementation of GSPC 2011-2020). CoP17 Doc. 14.6 – p. 2 Recommendations to the Conference of the Parties 7. Endorse the updated version of ANNEX 1 of the present document (which will include all responses received to the Notification mentioned in par. 6), and request the Secretariat to send it to the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, in order for it to be considered at CBD’s 13th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP13-CBD, Cancun, México; December 2016) as CITES contribution to the implementation of GSPC 2011-2020. 8. Request the Secretariat to: a) Publish and maintained updated on its website the summary contained in ANNEX 2 of the present document (Periodic Review proposals submitted to CoPs for amendments to Appendices I and II, taxa selected for Periodic Review of species included in App. I and II, and Review of Significant Trade in specimens of App. II species), including relevant updates derived from PC22 and CoP17; b) Request the UNEP-WCMC (United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre) to include in its website an interactive version of the online flora, currently available at https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/pc/22/E-PC22-07-02-Annex5-Rev2.xlsx , in such a way that CITES Parties can maintain it up to date, and thus have a clear idea on CITES contribution to the implementation of Target 1 of the GSPC. COMMENTS FROM THE SECRETARIAT A. The Secretariat supports the cooperation with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), as directed in Resolution Conf. 16.5. The document explains that this cooperation has mainly consisted of providing the CBD with updates on various CITES review processes concerning selected plant species (Periodic Review of the Appendices; Review of Significant Trade), and information on plant-related activities conducted by the Parties and the Secretariat that are or may be relevant to GSPC’s objectives. The document seeks agreement from the Conference of the Parties to continue this delivery of information to the GSPC. B. The Secretariat notes that to date, there seem to have been only limited opportunities for GSPC to inform CITES of relevant activities, or bring information on plant conservation and sustainable use initiatives involving CITES-listed species to the attention of the Parties. C. The Secretariat suggests that the Conference of the Parties agrees to the recommendation in paragraph 7 of the document, as it may contribute to discussions on the GSPC at CBD’s 13th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP13-CBD, Cancun, December 2016).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar
    The Red List of Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar Emily Beech, Malin Rivers, Sylvie Andriambololonera, Faranirina Lantoarisoa, Helene Ralimanana, Solofo Rakotoarisoa, Aro Vonjy Ramarosandratana, Megan Barstow, Katharine Davies, Ryan Hills, Kate Marfleet & Vololoniaina Jeannoda Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK. © 2020 Botanic Gardens Conservation International ISBN-10: 978-1-905164-75-2 ISBN-13: 978-1-905164-75-2 Reproduction of any part of the publication for educational, conservation and other non-profit purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder, provided that the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. Recommended citation: Beech, E., Rivers, M., Andriambololonera, S., Lantoarisoa, F., Ralimanana, H., Rakotoarisoa, S., Ramarosandratana, A.V., Barstow, M., Davies, K., Hills, BOTANIC GARDENS CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL (BGCI) R., Marfleet, K. and Jeannoda, V. (2020). Red List of is the world’s largest plant conservation network, comprising more than Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar. BGCI. Richmond, UK. 500 botanic gardens in over 100 countries, and provides the secretariat to AUTHORS the IUCN/SSC Global Tree Specialist Group. BGCI was established in 1987 Sylvie Andriambololonera and and is a registered charity with offices in the UK, US, China and Kenya. Faranirina Lantoarisoa: Missouri Botanical Garden Madagascar Program Helene Ralimanana and Solofo Rakotoarisoa: Kew Madagascar Conservation Centre Aro Vonjy Ramarosandratana: University of Antananarivo (Plant Biology and Ecology Department) THE IUCN/SSC GLOBAL TREE SPECIALIST GROUP (GTSG) forms part of the Species Survival Commission’s network of over 7,000 Emily Beech, Megan Barstow, Katharine Davies, Ryan Hills, Kate Marfleet and Malin Rivers: BGCI volunteers working to stop the loss of plants, animals and their habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Didiereaceae: Origine, Affinites Sustematiques Et Repartition a Madagascar
    Biogéographie de Madagascar, 1996 : 183-186 LES DIDIEREACEAE: ORIGINE, AFFINITES SUSTEMATIQUES ET REPARTITION A MADAGASCAR Lala H. RAKOTOVAO Charlotte RAJERIARISON & RAMAVOLOLONA Centre National de Recherches sur l’Environnement,B.P 1739 - 1O1 Antananarivo, MADAGASCAR Dt5partement de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales, Faculté des Sciences , B.P 906, Antananarivo 101, MADAGASCAR ABSTRACT.- Didieraceae comprise one of six endemic families present in Madagascar. The four genera and 11 species in this family have specific ecological preferences,and their systematic afFrnities have been problematical. Palynological and chemical systematic studies support the placement of the family amongthe Centrosperms. KEY-W0RDS.- Didieraceae, Origin,fini@, Endemic, Madagascar RESUME.- Les Didiereaceae, famille endémique malgache, présente une localisation géographique bien précise dont l’explication est encore discutée. Les4 genres et 11 espèces qui la composent ont des exigencesécologiques particulières (condifions édaphiques, précipitations) leurset affinités systématiques ont poséde nombreux problèmes aux systématiciens. L’étude palynologique et le développementde la chimiosystématique,ont permis de situer la familledans l’ordre des Centrospermales. MOTS‘ CLES.-Didiereaceae, Origine,finité, Endémique, Madagascar INTRODUCTION Les Didiereaceae constituent l’une des6 familles endémiques de Madagascar. Elles comportent 11 espèces réparties à l’intérieur de4 genres : - Didierea madaguscariensis Baill., D. trollii Capuron et Rauh. - Alluaudia ascendens Drake, A. proceraDrake, A. humberti Choux, A. dumosa Drake, A. comosa Drake, A. montagnacii Rauh. - Alluaudiopsis marnieriana Rauh, A.Jiherenensis Humbert & Choux. - Decaryia madaguscariensis Choux. La famille présente uneunité structurale dansla morphologie des différentes espèces (KOECHLIN et al., 1974). Ce sont toutes des plantes épineuses (Alluaudia dumosa est la moins épineuse de toutes), caractérisées parla présence de rameaux longs et derameaux courts et fortement adaptées à la sécheresse.
    [Show full text]
  • South American Cacti in Time and Space: Studies on the Diversification of the Tribe Cereeae, with Particular Focus on Subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae)
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2013 South American Cacti in time and space: studies on the diversification of the tribe Cereeae, with particular focus on subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae) Lendel, Anita Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-93287 Dissertation Published Version Originally published at: Lendel, Anita. South American Cacti in time and space: studies on the diversification of the tribe Cereeae, with particular focus on subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae). 2013, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. South American Cacti in Time and Space: Studies on the Diversification of the Tribe Cereeae, with Particular Focus on Subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae) _________________________________________________________________________________ Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr.sc.nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Anita Lendel aus Kroatien Promotionskomitee: Prof. Dr. H. Peter Linder (Vorsitz) PD. Dr. Reto Nyffeler Prof. Dr. Elena Conti Zürich, 2013 Table of Contents Acknowledgments 1 Introduction 3 Chapter 1. Phylogenetics and taxonomy of the tribe Cereeae s.l., with particular focus 15 on the subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae – Cactoideae) Chapter 2. Floral evolution in the South American tribe Cereeae s.l. (Cactaceae: 53 Cactoideae): Pollination syndromes in a comparative phylogenetic context Chapter 3. Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world’s major succulent 86 plant lineages Chapter 4. Tackling the molecular dating paradox: underestimated pitfalls and best 121 strategies when fossils are scarce Outlook and Future Research 207 Curriculum Vitae 209 Summary 211 Zusammenfassung 213 Acknowledgments I really believe that no one can go through the process of doing a PhD and come out without being changed at a very profound level.
    [Show full text]
  • PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev
    Original language: English PC22 Doc. 7.2 (Rev. 2) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ___________________ Twenty-second meeting of the Plants Committee Tbilisi (Georgia), 19-23 October 2015 Strategic matters Cooperation with other biodiversity-related multilateral environmental agreements COOPERATION WITH THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (RESOLUTION CONF. 16.5) 1. This document has been submitted by the Representative of North America (Mr. Hesiquio Benitez) as Chair of the intersessional working group on ‘Cooperation with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation [GSPC] of the Convention on Biological Diversity [CBD] (Resolution Conf. 16.5)’, in collaboration with the Mexican Scientific Authority (CONABIO).* Background 2. At the 21st meeting of the Plants Committee (PC21, Veracruz, May 2014), Mr. Benitez introduced document PC21 Doc. 8.2 con “Cooperation with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation of the Convention on Biological Diversity (Res. Conf. 16.5)”. 3. Following consideration of document PC21 Doc. 8.2, and on the basis of the recommendations included in it, the Plants Committee: 3.1. Noted Resolution Conf. 16.5 and the “List of potential CITES activities and products and their contribution of the objectives and targets of the updated Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011- 2020” in its Annex. 3.2 Encouraged Parties to report on progress with their implementation of Res. Conf. 16.5 to the regional representatives of the Committee. 3.3. Agreed that the chair of the intersessional working group on GSPC (the representative of North America, Mr. Hesiquio Benitez), in consultation with the Secretariat, present a report at the present meeting of the Plants Committee on progress with implementation of Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Pachypodium Geayi Is a Species of Pachypodium That Originated in Southwestern Madagascar
    ISLAS DE CACTUS AFRICA - AMERICA - MADAGASCAR MADAGASCAR CACTUS ISLAND Deciduous shrub armed with large and strong spines, which is capable of reaching more than 2 m in height. Erect, long and robust stems that sometimes when young twist and develop in a disorderly manner, becoming about to two bulky main stems when the plant is adult. It is characterized by barbs up to 3 cm long, silvery and arranged along and in line, covering the entire plant. Rounded leaves, thick and fleshy, intense green and appearing in a number of between 2-3 units in the same areola. The flowers are grouped into large umbels at the end of the stems, they are very small and yellowish, although it is rare to flower. Scientific name: Alluaudia procera (Drake) Drake Common name: Ocotillo of Madagascar Family: Didiereaceae Order: Caryophyllales Subclass or class: Caryophyllidae Flowering time: Place of origin: Madagascar Location: BOTANIC GARDEN Sector: Crasas Plants Habitat and Cultural Demands ALLUAUDIA PROCERA It needs very sunny exhibitions all year round. Irrigations should be measured, waiting for the substrate to dry before watering again. In winter you don't have to water it. It should be borne in mind that in its natural habitat rains occur sparsely and rarely. Uses It is grown in gardens in isolation. Its striking staff and the thorns that are arranged along its stem attract the attention of visitors to these gardens. Observations You have to be very careful in your handling for its impressive spikes, which can really do a lot of damage. Synonyms: Didierea procera Drake.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Spectacularly Spiny Alluaudias
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Two spectacularly spiny alluaudias Journal Item How to cite: Walker, Colin (2019). Two spectacularly spiny alluaudias. New Zealand Cactus & Succulent Journal, 72(3) pp. 5–8. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c [not recorded] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Two spectacularly spiny alluaudias by Colin C. Walker My plants in the UK are kept in a conservatory and these are Introducing Alluaudia summer growers when I water Alluaudia belongs to the them modestly. In the winter Didiereaceae, a very small family when they are leafless I keep them of succulents encompassing just at least 10oC and give them an 22 species in 7 genera (The Plant occasional water. List, 2019). Until about a decade Flowers are rarely produced in ago this family was considered pot culture since many of the to be endemic to Madagascar. plants need to get quite large However, recent molecular before reaching flowering size. evidence has resulted in So these plants are not grown for expansion of the family to include their outstanding flowers (which three genera from southern are somewhat insignificant if Africa (7 species of Ceraria and 2 flowering is achieved)! species of Portulacaria) and north- east tropical Africa (2 species of There are just 6 species of Calyptrotheca).
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþa N N E X E
    FACULTE DES SCIENCES DE LA NATURE ET DE LA VIE DEPARTEMENT DE BIOLOGIE THÈSE Présentée par Mme DAHANE Née ROUISSAT Lineda En vue de l’obtention du DOCTORAT EN SCIENCES BIOLOGIQUES Spécialité : Biochimie végétale appliquée. Thème : Etude des effets nématicides et molluscicides des extraits de quelques plantes sahariennes. Soutenue le : 21 Décembre 2017 Devant le jury composé de : Mr HADJADJ- AOUL Seghir, Prof. Université Oran1 ABB Président Mr BELKHODJA Moulay, Prof. UniversitéOran1, ABB Examinateur Mme BENNACEUR Malika, Prof. Université Oran1, ABB Examinatrice Mr MEKHALDI Abdelkader Prof. Université de Mostaganem, Examinateur Mr. Marouf Abderrazak. Prof. Centre. Univ. Naama Directeur de thèse Mr. Cheriti Abdelkrim Prof. Université de Béchar. Co-directeur de thèse 2016-2017 RESUME Dans le présent travail, les parties aériennes de vingt et une plantes sahariennes (21) des différentes familles botaniques (Asteraceae ; Amaranthaceae ; Rhamnaceae ; Brassicaceae ; Plumbaginaceae ; Capparidaceae ; Caryophyllaceae ; Fabaceae ; Apocynaceae ; Solanaceae ; Verbenaceae et Euphorbiacaeae) ont été utilisées pour évaluer leurs extraits aqueux (par macération ou à reflux) et les extraits organiques (acétoniques et méthanoliques avec ces fractions : hexanique, éthérique, dichlorométanolique, chloroformique, butanoliques…) pour l’activité nématicide (vis-à-vis nématodes phytoparasites à kyste : Globodera sp. et Heterodera sp. et molluscicide (vis-à-vis aux mollusques d’eau douce transporteurs des parasites : Lymnaea acumunata et Bulinus truncatus ). Les résultats sont exprimées en LC50 (taux de mortalité est égale à 50% de la population testée) par l’analyse des probits. Après l’extraction et le criblage phytochimique des extraits, l’évaluation a été réalisée sous des conditions expérimentales convenables aux cycles de vie de chaque spécimen zoologique (Température 24°C avec l’humidité et l’aération).
    [Show full text]
  • Dryland Tree Data for the Southwest Region of Madagascar: Alpha-Level
    Article in press — Early view MADAGASCAR CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT VOLUME 1 3 | ISSUE 01 — 201 8 PAGE 1 ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/1 0.431 4/mcd.v1 3i1 .7 Dryland tree data for the Southwest region of Madagascar: alpha-level data can support policy decisions for conserving and restoring ecosystems of arid and semiarid regions James C. AronsonI,II, Peter B. PhillipsonI,III, Edouard Le Correspondence: Floc'hII, Tantely RaminosoaIV James C. Aronson Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 631 66-0299, USA Email: ja4201 [email protected] ABSTRACT RÉSUMÉ We present an eco-geographical dataset of the 355 tree species Nous présentons un ensemble de données éco-géographiques (1 56 genera, 55 families) found in the driest coastal portion of the sur les 355 espèces d’arbres (1 56 genres, 55 familles) présentes spiny forest-thickets of southwestern Madagascar. This coastal dans les fourrés et forêts épineux de la frange côtière aride et strip harbors one of the richest and most endangered dryland tree semiaride du Sud-ouest de Madagascar. Cette région possède un floras in the world, both in terms of overall species diversity and des assemblages d’arbres de climat sec les plus riches (en termes of endemism. After describing the biophysical and socio-eco- de diversité spécifique et d’endémisme), et les plus menacés au nomic setting of this semiarid coastal region, we discuss this re- monde. Après une description du cadre biophysique et de la situ- gion’s diverse and rich tree flora in the context of the recent ation socio-économique de cette région, nous présentons cette expansion of the protected area network in Madagascar and the flore régionale dans le contexte de la récente expansion du growing engagement and commitment to ecological restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • Botany News. 2. May 20, 2020 California Academy of Sciences
    Botany News. 2. May 20, 2020 California Academy of Sciences Tristemma mauritianum (A Madagascar Princess Flower) F. Almeda Hello to our volunteers, We celebrated a milestone this month. It has been 15 years since Deb Trock (Director of Collections and Botany Collections Manager) joined the Academy! We held a surprise party for her online--she was expecting a boring meeting and instead she was greeted with home-made signs saying congratulations (one of the fancier ones is below), many smiling faces, and speeches recognizing her contributions to the Academy collections and to the staff. We would have preferred sharing this special moment with her in-person, but we are adapting and enjoying the time that we can spend together virtually. We hope you enjoy our second newsletter, and we hope you are all keeping well and busy. With our best wishes from the Botany Department A Walk Through the Orchids in San Francisco Tom Daniel During my walk home from the Academy through four or five different neighborhoods on the west side of San Francisco, I see several different large-flowered and brightly colored orchids that residents have in their yards, porches, and windows. For the past few years, I have been growing a beautiful orchid in a bark-filled pot in my backyard. Our department’s research associate and orchid specialist, De Mally, gave Mary and me a cluster of pseudobulbs of Maxillaria soconuscana (recently transferred to a different genus, as Psittacoglossum soconuscanum), a native of Chiapas, Mexico that former botany curator Dennis Breedlove collected in 1986, and which she and Dennis described as new to science in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • PC19 Inf. 2 English Only / Únicamente En Inglés / Seulement En Anglais
    PC19 Inf. 2 English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA CONVENCIÓN SOBRE EL COMERCIO INTERNACIONAL DE ESPECIES AMENAZADAS DE FAUNA Y FLORA SILVESTRES CONVENTION SUR LE COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL DES ESPECES DE FAUNE ET DE FLORE SAUVAGES MENACEES D'EXTINCTION ____________ Nineteenth meeting of the Plants Committee – Geneva (Switzerland), 18-21 April 2011 Decimonovena reunión del Comité de Flora – Ginebra (Suiza), 18-21 de abril de 2011 Dix-neuvième session du Comité pour les plantes – Genève (Suisse), 18 – 21 avril 2011 NET EXPORTS OF APPENDIX II PLANTS, 2004-2009 The attached information document has been submitted by the CITES Secretariat1. El documento informativo adjunto ha sido presentado por la Secretaría CITES2. Le document d'information joint est soumis par le Secrétariat CITES3. 1 The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. 2 Las denominaciones geográficas empleadas en este documento no implican juicio alguno por parte de la Secretaría CITES o del Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente sobre la condición jurídica de ninguno de los países, zonas o territorios citados, ni respecto de la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites. La responsabilidad sobre el contenido del documento incumbe exclusivamente a su autor.
    [Show full text]
  • WRA Species Report
    Family: Euphorbiaceae Taxon: Euphorbia stenoclada Synonym: Euphorbia cirsioides Costantin & Gallaud Common Name Silver Thicket Euphorbia insulae-europae Pax Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: EVALUATE Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 3 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 y 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 ? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 y 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 n 405 Toxic
    [Show full text]
  • Aizoales 3-663.20.00
    Aizoales 3-663.20.00 Taxonomy Introduction In the Apg2 classifcation Te suborder is recognised with Lo- Tey have a tendency to give a lot in order to be accepted. Tey phiocarpaceae, Barbeuiaceae, Aizoaceae, Gisekiaceae, Nyctag- want to belong to the group, the family and in order to do so inaceae, Phytolaccaceae and Sarcobataceae. they have a tendency to adapt, to give in. Because they are high- ly sensitive they accurately feel what the others want and need Plant theory and can easily adapt to that. It is only when they feel placed In the Plant theory the above clade is given the name Aizoales. outside of the group that they can become angry. It feels like a Aizoales is placed in Phase 2 of the Caryophyllidae. basic need of life to be accepted but it is difcult for them to feel In the frst version the above Families were placed in the sever- completely accepted as their inner life is ofen felt as peculiar al Subphases. and strange. Tey feel weird in a strange world. Tey feel very In Plant theory 2 only Aizoaceae is lef inPhase 2. religious, a connection with the spiritual world and God and Te other Families are transferred toPhase 3. that connection is ofen not very well accepted in society. Due to their inner convictions they can get in confict with society. Subphases Mostly their solution is to keep their opinions and feelings to 1. Sesuvioideae Aizoaceae themselves; they prefer to avoid the conficts. Tey hope to be 2. Drosanthemoideae Aizoaceae be able to stay with their own inner convictions and that they 3.
    [Show full text]