2007 Rail Map.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mrr 199911.Pdf
o 4470 916 7 THE NEW SPEeTRUM® USRA 4-B-2 LIGHT MOUNTAIN with Glowing Firebox . , Hot on the heels of our award-winning 2-8-0 Consolidation (voted 1998 product of the year by readers of Model Railroader magazine), Bachmann introduces the USRA 4-8-2 Light Mountain. Complete with a glowing firebox, the Light Mountain is an ITEM # DESCRIPTION outstanding representation of post-World War I steam. 81601 Painted Unlettered 81602 Southern This latest addition to our HO scale Spectrum® line is, 81605 Union Pacific of course, DCC ready. Our unique belt drive provides 81604 Nashville, Chattanooga see-through clearance between the boiler and diecast frame, & St. Louis and a sprung axle on the 2nd driver allows for excellent pickup 81605 New Haven and tracking performance. Additional premium features include 81606 Missouri Pacific finescale driver spokes and counterweights, separately-detailed 81607 Southern Pacific leaf springs, and separate sanding lines. Watch for the glow of the Light Mountain's firebox as she Suggested Retail Price: $170_00 emerges from a tunnel or snakes through a shadowy pass SHIPPING NOW on your railroad! You can fire up your imagination NOW with six roadnames and a painted, unlettered model. ® BACHMANN INDUSTRIES, INC . •:. PHILADELPHIA, PA .:. WWW.BACHMANNTRAINS.COM MODEL RAILROADING November 1999 VOLUME 29 NUMBER 11 FEATURES 20 T Modeling Maine Central F3s by Mark E. Sharp 26 T Kitbashing the Psycho Bates House by V. S. Roseman 32 T FREIGHTCAROLOGY. 52 T MODELING MODERN INTERMODAL Kansas City Southern's Boxcars Visual Impressions: by David G. Casdorph Using the Prototype as Your Guide by David A. -
High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2
San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning Urban and Regional Planning January 2007 High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2 Allison deCerreno Shishir Mathur San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/urban_plan_pub Part of the Infrastructure Commons, Public Economics Commons, Public Policy Commons, Real Estate Commons, Transportation Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Allison deCerreno and Shishir Mathur. "High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2" Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning (2007). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Urban and Regional Planning at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MTI Report 06-03 MTI HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS-PART 2 IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS-PART HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: Funded by U.S. Department of HIGH-SPEED RAIL Transportation and California Department PROJECTS IN THE UNITED of Transportation STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS PART 2 Report 06-03 Mineta Transportation November Institute Created by 2006 Congress in 1991 MTI REPORT 06-03 HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS PART 2 November 2006 Allison L. -
Northern Ohio Association of Railway Societies
NOARS - Northern Ohio Association of Railway Societies - Northern Ohio Railroad Related Organizations Akron Railroad Club Beaver-Lawrence Railway Historical Society http://akronrrclub.wordpress.com/ http://www.beavervalleyjunction.org/ meets on the fourth Friday of every month except December at the Meetings generally take place the second Saturday of every month. New Horizons Christian Church, 290 Darrow Road, in Akron, Ohio. West Pittsburg Station Meetings begin at 8 p.m 2114 Rt. 168 Box 429 President: Craig Sanders, 3495 West Pittsburg, Pa. 16160-0405 Silsby Road, University Heights, OH 44118, [email protected] Bedford Historical Society http://www.bedfordohiohistory.org Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Historical Society Collection includes construction documents for Tinkers Creek http://www.acyhs.org/ Viaduct. Manages 1882 Wheeling and Lake Erie Railroad depot P.O. Box 196, PO Box 46282, Bedford OH 44146. Sharon Center, Ohio 44274, (440) 232-0796 330-867-6990 Mondays,Wednesdays, 7:30 to All Aboard Ohio 10:00 PM; Thursdays 10:00 http://www.allaboardohio.org/ AM to 4:00 PM, second advocate for better passenger rail services in Ohio Sunday, 2:00 to 5:00 PM. 309 South 4th Street, Suite 304, Bucyrus Model Railroad Association Columbus, OH 43215 (614) 228 Byesville Scenic Railway -6005 http://www.bsrw.org/ AMTRAK weekend excursions. http://www.amtrak.com PO Box 254, Byesville, OH 43723 Byesville, OH 1-800-USA-RAIL (1-800-872-7245) Chesapeake and Ohio Historical Society regularly scheduled passerger http://www.cohs.org/ service throughout the USA. 2 daily trains through Cleveland. 312 E Ridgeway Street, Clifton Forge, VA AMTRAK Historical Society Cincinnati Railroad Club http://www.amtrakhistoricalsociety.com/ http://www.cincinnatirrclub.org/ P.O. -
Missouri Blue Ribbon Panel on Hyperloop
Chairman Lt. Governor Mike Kehoe Vice Chairman Andrew G. Smith Panelists Jeff Aboussie Cathy Bennett Tom Blair Travis Brown Mun Choi Tom Dempsey Rob Dixon Warren Erdman Rep. Travis Fitzwater Michael X. Gallagher Rep. Derek Grier Chris Gutierrez Rhonda Hamm-Niebruegge Mike Lally Mary Lamie Elizabeth Loboa Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer MISSOURI BLUE RIBBON Patrick McKenna Dan Mehan Joe Reagan Clint Robinson PANEL ON HYPERLOOP Sen. Caleb Rowden Greg Steinhoff Report prepared for The Honorable Elijah Haahr Tariq Taherbhai Leonard Toenjes Speaker of the Missouri House of Representatives Bill Turpin Austin Walker Ryan Weber Sen. Brian Williams Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 A National Certification Track in Missouri .................................................................................................... 8 Track Specifications ................................................................................................................................. 10 SECTION 1: International Tube Transport Center of Excellence (ITTCE) ................................................... 12 Center Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 12 Research Areas ................................................................................................................................... -
Final Alternatives Selection Report: Identification of Reasonable and Feasible Passenger Rail Alternatives
Final Alternatives Selection Report: Identification of Reasonable and Feasible Passenger Rail Alternatives Milwaukee-Twin Cities High-Speed Rail Corridor Program Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Transportation Wisconsin Department of Transportation Prepared by: Quandel Consultants, LLC Version: October 26, 2011 Revised November 1, 2012 Alternatives Selection Report Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………...vi 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Alternatives Selection Report .................................................................................. 1‐1 1.2 Background of Midwest Regional Rail Initiative ........................................................................ 1‐1 1.3 Background of Milwaukee‐Twin Cities High‐Speed Rail Corridor Program ............................... 1‐4 1.4 Project Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................... 1‐13 1.5 Route Alternatives Analysis ..................................................................................................... 1‐15 1.6 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................... 1‐16 1.7 Identification of Potential Passenger Rail Alternatives ............................................................ 1‐17 1.8 Technical Documentation ....................................................................................................... -
The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study
The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM & BUSINESS PLAN July 2007 Prepared for The Ohio Rail Development Commission Indiana Department of Transportation Michigan Department of Transportation New York Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Prepared by: Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. In association with HNTB, Inc. The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail - Ohio Hub Study Technical Memorandum & Business Plan Table of Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................x Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 System Planning and Feasibility Goals and Objectives................................................... 1-3 1.2 Business Planning Objectives.......................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Study Approach and Methodology .................................................................................. 1-4 1.4 Railroad Infrastructure Analysis...................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Passenger -
The Benefits of Intercity Passenger Rail
THE BENEFITS OF INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL (110–54) HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON RAILROADS, PIPELINES, AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 26, 2007 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 36–685 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:27 Feb 08, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\DOCS\36685 HTRANS1 PsN: JASON COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE JAMES L. OBERSTAR, Minnesota, Chairman NICK J. RAHALL, II, West Virginia JOHN L. MICA, Florida PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon DON YOUNG, Alaska JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois THOMAS E. PETRI, Wisconsin ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina Columbia JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee JERROLD NADLER, New York WAYNE T. GILCHREST, Maryland CORRINE BROWN, Florida VERNON J. EHLERS, Michigan BOB FILNER, California STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas RICHARD H. BAKER, Louisiana GENE TAYLOR, Mississippi FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JERRY MORAN, Kansas ELLEN O. TAUSCHER, California GARY G. MILLER, California LEONARD L. BOSWELL, Iowa ROBIN HAYES, North Carolina TIM HOLDEN, Pennsylvania HENRY E. BROWN, JR., South Carolina BRIAN BAIRD, Washington TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON, Illinois RICK LARSEN, Washington TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts SAM GRAVES, Missouri JULIA CARSON, Indiana BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania TIMOTHY H. -
2021-2022 Transportation Legislative Agenda
Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments 2021-2022 Transportation Legislative Agenda of the Toledo Region Transportation Legislative Agenda of the Toledo Region [2021-2022] Federal Transportation Funding Brief As the infrastructure funding gap continues to grow, prudent investments are needed now to prevent further deterioration of our streets, highways, bridges, rail and transit systems, pedestrian and bikeway systems, airports, seaports, and waterways. The public sector has a responsibility to act to improve safety, support quality of life, increase employment opportunities, and enhance economic competitiveness. The strategies and recommendations included in the Toledo Region Transportation Legislative Agenda are the consensus view of the members of the Transportation Coalition. Consultative meetings held with coalition members between July 2020 and September 2020 produced a set of legislative policy recommendations and modal policy briefs for federal, state, and local leaders. FEDERAL Priorities • After 25 years of stagnation, increase the gas tax or pursue other reforms to ensure long-term solvency of the Highway Trust Fund. Support the ability of state and local governments to plan, fund, and construct the projects that will rebuild our infrastructure and strengthen our economy. • Prefer user taxes and fees such as the motor fuel tax and other fuels taxes, vehicle miles traveled fee, freight waybill tax, shipping container fees, impact fees, tolling, and similar strategies. Design these fees with attention to the fee per unit, the means to adjust the fee over time (such as linking to Consumer Price Index), administrative costs, and privacy safeguards. • Where appropriate, attract private capital via public-private partnerships that feature transparent agreements and accountability through tightly monitored performance standards. -
Calgary-Edmonton High Speed Rail Oliver Wyman Choice Modeling
Presentation To HRTPO Steering Committee Agenda Item #2 HRTPO Strategic Campaign and Vision Plan for Passenger Rail Presentation By May 19, 2010 Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. Study Timeline TEMS, Inc. 1 Vision Plan Phase 1: Study Objectives 1. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization – Resolution 2009-05 The Hampton Roads TPO endorses – designation of a “High-Speed Rail” corridor along the Norfolk Southern/Route 460 corridor. enhancement of the intercity passenger rail service along the CSX/I-64 corridor. 2. USDOT FRA Public/Private Partnership Potential – POSITIVE OPERATING RATIO POSITIVE COST BENEFIT RATIO TEMS, Inc. 2 Development Steps Max No. of Steps Route Infrastructure Station Speed Trains Shared Track Main Street I-64/CSXT 79 mph 2 Schedule Newport News Step 1 Enhancement (existing) Route 460/ Shared Track S tap le s M ill O n ly Norfolk 79 mph 1-3 NS Norfolk Southern Main Street I-64/CSXT 79 mph 3 Shared Track Newport News Step 2 (existing) (DEIS Route 460/ Alt 1) Norfolk 79 mph 4-6 Shared Track Main Street Southern Main Street I-64/CSXT 90 mph 4-6 Shared Track Newport News Downtown/Airport Step 3 Route 460/ Norfolk Dedicated Track Main Street 110 mph 8-12 Southern V Line B o w e rs H ill Main Street I-64/CSXT 110 mph 6-9 Dedicated Track Newport News Downtown/Airport Step 4 Route 460/ Dedicated Electric Norfolk Main Street 150 mph 12-16 Track Southern B o w e rs H ill V Line TEMS, Inc. 3 Vision Plan: Station Concept Map TEMS, Inc. -
By Lance Mindheim
Price: Forever Free PRINTER-FRIENDLY Edition January 2012 - Columbia River N Scale club - Scratchbuilding a car float - Passenger car truck conversion - MRH looks at RailPro and lots more, inside ... Lance Mindheim builds Photo-laminated structures Page 1 • Jan 2012 MRH Front cover Front Cover: Lance Mindheim’s HO scene shows us how some clever photo-lamination techniques can pro- duce stunningly realistic model scenes. This is truly an MRH “Yes, it’s a model!” photo by Lance Mindheim. ISSN 2152-7423 Editorial Staff Joe D. Fugate, Publisher Charlie Comstock, Editor MRH sponsors Columnists Richard Bale, News and events John Drye, N scale Remember to tell them: “MRH sent me!” Les Halmos, Modular railroading Lew Matt, Narrow gauge and shortlines Bruce Petrarca, DCC Learn about becoming a Sponsoring Advertiser! Need something? See our Hobby Marketplace! Special Correspondents Jim Duncan, Layouts and operations Byron Henderson, Layouts and track planning Production Patty Fugate, pasteup and layout Joe Brugger, copy editing Mike Dodd, copy editing Technical Assistant Jeff Shultz Advertising Account Manager Les Halmos MRH Sponsoring Advertisers get extra benefits such as For more model railroading products, including hard-to-find logo placement and visibility with the MRH web audience items, our Hobby Marketplace is on page 56. (50,000+ in Nov 2011). Click here to get started! Page 2 • Jan 2012 MRH Masthead and Sponsors Page 3 • Jan 2012 MRH Advertisement Visit BLMA website Page 4 • Jan 2012 MRH Advertisement Visit Walthers website Page 5 • Jan 2012 MRH Advertisement Visit ExactRail website Table of Main Features contents Columns 52 First Look: RailPro system 79 Simple car card system 23 Peninsula construction! MRH expanded First Look, with video! A single card per train does it all Up the Creek by Charlie Comstock HO by Jeff Shultz All scales by Tom Driscoll 58 First Look: ESU car lighting 82 Build a railcar barge 34 Time to run trains? LED lighting for passenger cars How to build a rail barge step-by-step Getting Real by Mike Rose HO by Jeff Shultz All scales by M.C. -
Pennsylvania Hyperloop Study Report
Pennsylvania Hyperloop DR AF T REPORT June 2020 Image: Virgin Hyperloop One Pennsylvania Hyperloop — Draft Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents i List of Figures ii List of Tables ii Acronyms iii Executive Summary 1 Background 1 Next Steps 3 I. Background 4 Regional Hyperloop Studies 5 History of Transformational Technologies in Transportation 7 II. Hyperloop State of the Industry 8 Hyperloop Technology Background 8 Hyperloop Technology Providers 8 Technology Readiness 10 National Initiatives / NETT Council 10 Safety, Verification and Regulations 10 Independent Verification 11 European Committee for Standardization (CEN) 11 Governance 11 III. Defining Pennsylvania Hyperloop Scenarios 12 Drivers for Building Pennsylvania-Concept Scenarios 12 IV. Demand, Benefits and Costs 13 Passenger Demand 13 Pennsylvania Hyperloop Travel Times 14 Freight Movement 15 Economic Development 16 Capital Costs 17 V. Benefit-Cost Analysis 18 Overview 18 Key Findings from the All-Cities (Chicago to New York City Metropolitan Area) Scenario 18 Key Findings from the Pennsylvania-Only Scenario 19 Not Implementing Hyperloop in Pennsylvania 20 Scorecard Evaluation 20 VI. Business Case 22 Preliminary Business Case Results 22 Business Model Options 24 Project Funding Options 24 Key Business Case Elements 25 VII. Next Steps 26 Where Do We Go from Here? 27 i June 2020 Pennsylvania Hyperloop — Draft Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Potential Hyperloop Connectivity in Pennsylvania 4 Figure 2 – Regional Hyperloop Studies 5 Figure 3 – Goddard’s Vactrain (1904) and -
Planes, Trains, & Automobiles
WALD_4.24.20_FINAL (DO NOT DELETE) 8/22/2020 1:01 PM NOTE PLANES, TRAINS & AUTOMOBILES: REGULATING THE TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES OF TOMORROW ADAM P. WALD* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 380 II. THE CURRENT STATE OF TRANSPORTATION INNOVATION ......................... 381 A. Lock-In: Transportation Innovation is Dictated by, and Limited to, Existing Platforms ....................................................................... 381 B. Congressional Attempts at Modernization of National Transportation Infrastructure Have Failed .......................................................... 382 C. The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 and its Limits ...................................................................................... 389 III. THE NATURAL GAS ACT: A TEMPLATE FOR FOSTERING INNOVATION IN TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................... 394 A. Evolution of the Natural Gas Act .................................................... 395 B. Federal Preemption Under the Natural Gas Act ............................ 396 C. Eminent Domain as a Means of Facilitating Infrastructure Development ................................................................................ 399 D. The Public Good ............................................................................ 401 E. The “Hinshaw” Exemption and its Role in Preserving Balance Between State Sovereignty and Federal Oversight.....................