Alternatives Analysis Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alternatives Analysis Report APPENDIX A ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS REPORT This page intentionally left blank Final Alternatives Analysis Report Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha Regional Passenger Rail System Planning Study from schizoform October 30, 2012 PhotoCreative under used Commons Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha Regional Passenger Rail System Planning Study Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Study Area ................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Purpose of and Need for the Study ............................................................................ 1-1 1.2.1 Study Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.2 Purpose ....................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.3 Need ............................................................................................................ 1-4 1.3 Alternatives Analysis Review Process ....................................................................... 1-8 CHAPTER 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SERVICE ........................................................... 2-1 2.1 Speed and Travel Time .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Stations ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Frequency .................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.4 Infrastructure .............................................................................................................. 2-2 2.5 Phased Implementation ............................................................................................. 2-3 CHAPTER 3 RANGE OF ROUTE ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................... 3-1 3.1 No-Build Alternative ................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Previously Established Routes ................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Potential Combinations of Routes .............................................................................. 3-3 3.4 Summary .................................................................................................................... 3-3 CHAPTER 4 SCREENING METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Screening Criteria ...................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.2 Technical Feasibility .................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.3 Economic Feasibility .................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.4 Environmental Concerns ............................................................................. 4-2 4.2 Screening Process ..................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.1 Step 1 – Coarse-Level Screening ................................................................ 4-3 4.2.2 Step 2 – Fine-Level Screening .................................................................... 4-6 CHAPTER 5 COARSE-LEVEL SCREENING ...................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Route Alternative 1 .................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Purpose and Need: Travel Demand ............................................................ 5-1 5.1.2 Purpose and Need: Competitive and Attractive Travel Modes .................... 5-1 5.1.3 Technical Feasibility .................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.4 Economic Feasibility .................................................................................... 5-2 5.1.5 Environmental Concerns: Major Challenges ................................................ 5-2 5.1.6 Environmental Concerns: Sensitive Areas ................................................... 5-2 Final Alternatives Analysis Report i October 2012 Table of Contents Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha Regional Passenger Rail System Planning Study 5.1.7 Environmental Concerns: Right-of-Way ....................................................... 5-2 5.2 Route Alternative 2 .................................................................................................... 5-2 5.2.1 Purpose and Need: Travel Demand ............................................................ 5-3 5.2.2 Purpose and Need: Competitive and Attractive Travel Modes .................... 5-3 5.2.3 Technical Feasibility .................................................................................... 5-3 5.2.4 Economic Feasibility .................................................................................... 5-4 5.2.5 Environmental Concerns: Major Challenges ................................................ 5-4 5.2.6 Environmental Concerns: Sensitive Areas ................................................... 5-4 5.2.7 Environmental Concerns: Right-of-Way ....................................................... 5-4 5.3 Route Alternative 3 .................................................................................................... 5-4 5.3.1 Purpose and Need: Travel Demand ............................................................ 5-5 5.3.2 Purpose and Need: Competitive and Attractive Travel Modes .................... 5-5 5.3.3 Technical Feasibility .................................................................................... 5-5 5.3.4 Economic Feasibility .................................................................................... 5-5 5.3.5 Environmental Concerns: Major Challenges ................................................ 5-5 5.3.6 Environmental Concerns: Sensitive Areas ................................................... 5-6 5.3.7 Environmental Concerns: Right-of-Way ....................................................... 5-6 5.4 Route Alternative 4 .................................................................................................... 5-6 5.4.1 Purpose and Need: Travel Demand ............................................................ 5-7 5.4.2 Purpose and Need: Competitive and Attractive Travel Modes .................... 5-7 5.4.3 Technical Feasibility .................................................................................... 5-7 5.4.4 Economic Feasibility .................................................................................... 5-8 5.4.5 Environmental Concerns: Major Challenges ................................................ 5-8 5.4.6 Environmental Concerns: Sensitive Areas ................................................... 5-8 5.4.7 Environmental Concerns: Right-of-Way ....................................................... 5-9 5.5 Route Alternative 5 .................................................................................................... 5-9 5.5.1 Purpose and Need: Travel Demand ............................................................ 5-9 5.5.2 Purpose and Need: Competitive and Attractive Travel Modes .................... 5-9 5.5.3 Technical Feasibility .................................................................................. 5-10 5.5.4 Economic Feasibility .................................................................................. 5-10 5.5.5 Environmental Concerns: Major Challenges .............................................. 5-10 5.5.6 Environmental Concerns: Sensitive Areas ................................................. 5-10 5.5.7 Environmental Concerns: Right-of-Way ..................................................... 5-11 5.6 Route Alternative 4-A ............................................................................................... 5-11 5.6.1 Purpose and Need: Travel Demand .......................................................... 5-11 5.6.2 Purpose and Need: Competitive and Attractive Travel Modes .................. 5-11 5.6.3 Technical Feasibility .................................................................................. 5-11 5.6.4 Economic Feasibility .................................................................................. 5-12 October 2012 ii Final Alternatives Analysis Report Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha Regional Passenger Rail System Planning Study Table of Contents 5.6.5 Environmental Concerns: Major Challenges .............................................. 5-12 5.6.6 Environmental Concerns: Sensitive Areas ................................................. 5-12 5.6.7 Environmental Concerns: Right-of-Way ..................................................... 5-12 5.7 No-Build Alternative ................................................................................................. 5-13 5.7.1 Purpose and Need: Travel Demand .......................................................... 5-13 5.7.2 Purpose and Need: Competitive and Attractive Travel Modes .................. 5-13 5.7.3 Technical Feasibility .................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • X********X************************************************** * Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made * from the Original Document
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 302 264 IR 052 601 AUTHOR Buckingham, Betty Jo, Ed. TITLE Iowa and Some Iowans. A Bibliography for Schools and Libraries. Third Edition. INSTITUTION Iowa State Dept. of Education, Des Moines. PUB DATE 88 NOTE 312p.; Fcr a supplement to the second edition, see ED 227 842. PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibllographies; *Authors; Books; Directories; Elementary Secondary Education; Fiction; History Instruction; Learning Resources Centers; *Local Color Writing; *Local History; Media Specialists; Nonfiction; School Libraries; *State History; United States History; United States Literature IDENTIFIERS *Iowa ABSTRACT Prepared primarily by the Iowa State Department of Education, this annotated bibliography of materials by Iowans or about Iowans is a revised tAird edition of the original 1969 publication. It both combines and expands the scope of the two major sections of previous editions, i.e., Iowan listory and literature, and out-of-print materials are included if judged to be of sufficient interest. Nonfiction materials are listed by Dewey subject classification and fiction in alphabetical order by author/artist. Biographies and autobiographies are entered under the subject of the work or in the 920s. Each entry includes the author(s), title, bibliographic information, interest and reading levels, cataloging information, and an annotation. Author, title, and subject indexes are provided, as well as a list of the people indicated in the bibliography who were born or have resided in Iowa or who were or are considered to be Iowan authors, musicians, artists, or other Iowan creators. Directories of periodicals and annuals, selected sources of Iowa government documents of general interest, and publishers and producers are also provided.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning Urban and Regional Planning January 2007 High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2 Allison deCerreno Shishir Mathur San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/urban_plan_pub Part of the Infrastructure Commons, Public Economics Commons, Public Policy Commons, Real Estate Commons, Transportation Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Allison deCerreno and Shishir Mathur. "High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2" Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning (2007). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Urban and Regional Planning at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MTI Report 06-03 MTI HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS-PART 2 IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS-PART HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: Funded by U.S. Department of HIGH-SPEED RAIL Transportation and California Department PROJECTS IN THE UNITED of Transportation STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS PART 2 Report 06-03 Mineta Transportation November Institute Created by 2006 Congress in 1991 MTI REPORT 06-03 HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS PART 2 November 2006 Allison L.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Index Trail Tales: the Journal of Boone County History
    Issue Index Trail Tales: The Journal of Boone County History Published by the Boone County Historical Society Issues 1-127(September 1969 –Spring/Summer 2018) Compiled by Suzanne S. Caswell Copyrighted by Suzanne S. Caswell 2019 Trail Tales Index by Issue* Compiled by Suzanne Caswell No. Date Title Page 1 September “Historical Fair to be Held” 1 1969 BCHS Board Meeting Held (synopsis of minutes) 2-3 “City Hall Records” (Given to BCHS) 4 “Boonesboro Pottery” (Operated by John Franklin Hyten) 4-5 “Four Men Killed: Fast Mail Jumps Track Near River Bridge” 6-9 Boone County Democrat, August 4, 1899 “On Display” (Note about A. P. Olmstead, victim of crash into Honey Creek, July 6, 1881) 9 “The Strange Men at Fraser” 10-24 By A. P. Butts “About this Booklet” (purpose of publication) BC 2 Jan./Feb. Trail Tales (First issue so named) IFC† 1970 “Report of Committee- 1903” (Early Settlers’ Association) 1-8 “Mary Brown Crossing” (Ft. D. D. M. & So. RR) 8-9 “Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth” (Report on possible museum building) 9-10 “The Boone County Historical Fair” 10-13 “Life at the Moingona Depot” 13-14 Boone Illustrated “1896” (Insert) 3 Apr./May Imprinted Seal of the Incline Railway & Coal Co. 1 1970 “The Runaway on Fraser Hill” (Ft. D., D. M. & So. RR) 3-13 By A. P. Butts “Report on March 18th Meeting” (Discusses the development of Kate Shelley site) 14 “Kate Shelley’s Speech, 1888” 15-39 By Kate Shelley Poem: “Grove Mine No. 1” (IBC)‡ By Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 0 1 2 Annualreport
    2012 ANNUAL REPORT RECHARGED Served at Retail SERVICE AREA MAP Served at Wholesale Elk City Station Power Station Valley Station Landfill-gas plant Wind Generation Wind Turbine 6.2 megawatts OPPD Headquarters .66 megawatts Elkhorn Ridge Wind Farm 25-megawatt participation agreement Fort Calhoun Station Crofton Bluffs Wind Farm Nuclear plant, 478.6 megawatts 13.6-megawatt participation North Omaha Station agreement Coal & natural-gas plant, 626.7 megawatts OPPD Headquarters Jones Street Station Oil plant, 122.7 megawatts Sarpy County Station Oil & natural-gas plant, 315.3 megawatts Cass County Station Natural-gas plant, 323.2 megawatts Ainsworth Wind Farm Nebraska City Station Unit 1 10-megawatt participation Coal plant, 651.5 megawatts agreement Nebraska City Station Unit 2 Petersburg Wind Farm Coal plant, 684.6 megawatts Broken Bow I Wind Farm 40.5-megawatt participation 18-megawatt participation agreement agreement Flat Water Wind Farm 60-megawatt participation About oppd agreement Omaha Public Power District is a publicly owned electric utility that serves a population of 780,455 people, more than any other electric utility in the state. Founded in 1946 as a public entity, the business-managed utility is governed by an elected board of eight directors. While its headquarters is located in Omaha, Neb., OPPD has several other locations in its 13-county, 5,000-square-mile service area in southeast Nebraska. The majority of OPPD’s power comes from three baseload power plants: North Omaha Station and Nebraska City Station, both coal-fired plants, and Fort Calhoun Station, a nuclear power plant. Additional energy comes from three peaking plants and renewable energy resources, including a landfill-gas plant and wind turbines.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Blue Ribbon Panel on Hyperloop
    Chairman Lt. Governor Mike Kehoe Vice Chairman Andrew G. Smith Panelists Jeff Aboussie Cathy Bennett Tom Blair Travis Brown Mun Choi Tom Dempsey Rob Dixon Warren Erdman Rep. Travis Fitzwater Michael X. Gallagher Rep. Derek Grier Chris Gutierrez Rhonda Hamm-Niebruegge Mike Lally Mary Lamie Elizabeth Loboa Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer MISSOURI BLUE RIBBON Patrick McKenna Dan Mehan Joe Reagan Clint Robinson PANEL ON HYPERLOOP Sen. Caleb Rowden Greg Steinhoff Report prepared for The Honorable Elijah Haahr Tariq Taherbhai Leonard Toenjes Speaker of the Missouri House of Representatives Bill Turpin Austin Walker Ryan Weber Sen. Brian Williams Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 A National Certification Track in Missouri .................................................................................................... 8 Track Specifications ................................................................................................................................. 10 SECTION 1: International Tube Transport Center of Excellence (ITTCE) ................................................... 12 Center Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 12 Research Areas ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Alternatives Selection Report: Identification of Reasonable and Feasible Passenger Rail Alternatives
    Final Alternatives Selection Report: Identification of Reasonable and Feasible Passenger Rail Alternatives Milwaukee-Twin Cities High-Speed Rail Corridor Program Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Transportation Wisconsin Department of Transportation Prepared by: Quandel Consultants, LLC Version: October 26, 2011 Revised November 1, 2012 Alternatives Selection Report Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………...vi 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Alternatives Selection Report .................................................................................. 1‐1 1.2 Background of Midwest Regional Rail Initiative ........................................................................ 1‐1 1.3 Background of Milwaukee‐Twin Cities High‐Speed Rail Corridor Program ............................... 1‐4 1.4 Project Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................... 1‐13 1.5 Route Alternatives Analysis ..................................................................................................... 1‐15 1.6 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................... 1‐16 1.7 Identification of Potential Passenger Rail Alternatives ............................................................ 1‐17 1.8 Technical Documentation .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska Transit Corridors Study Commuter Rail and Express Bus Options Evaluation
    Nebraska Transit Corridors Study Commuter Rail and Express Bus Options Evaluation Final Report Prepared for: Nebraska Transit and Rail Advisory Council (NTRAC) Assisted by the Nebraska Department of Roads (NDOR) Prepared by: Wilbur Smith Associates and HWS Consulting Group December 23, 2003 Executive Summary NEBRASKA TRANSIT CORRIDORS STUDY PROJECT OVERVIEW The increasing suburbanization of metropolitan areas across the United States has prompted a remarkable revival of regional transit. For the first time in decades, several new commuter railroads have been introduced. States also are continuing a trend in sponsoring new intercity rail passenger services. Where either commuter rail or intercity rail is not appropriate, public transportation authorities have begun initiating new commuter or express bus and even Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) solutions. All these modes are aimed at one goal – providing enhanced mobility by giving people meaningful choices of how to travel. This goal is at the heart of the Nebraska Transit Corridor Study. The study was sponsored by the Nebraska Transit and Rail Advisory Council (NTRAC), which was created by the State Legislature in 1999 to assess the transportation demand and needs of current and future commuters. Driving the study is the growth in commuter and intercity trips. Along with this growth is the need for enhanced mobility beyond what can be provided by more lanes for congested roadways. Accordingly, the purpose of this study has been to identify: x New transit corridors between Nebraska cities; and x The modal options appropriate for corridor conditions. The study has also sought to identify the new steps toward implementation for feasible transit options.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study
    The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM & BUSINESS PLAN July 2007 Prepared for The Ohio Rail Development Commission Indiana Department of Transportation Michigan Department of Transportation New York Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Prepared by: Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. In association with HNTB, Inc. The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail - Ohio Hub Study Technical Memorandum & Business Plan Table of Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................x Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 System Planning and Feasibility Goals and Objectives................................................... 1-3 1.2 Business Planning Objectives.......................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Study Approach and Methodology .................................................................................. 1-4 1.4 Railroad Infrastructure Analysis...................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Passenger
    [Show full text]
  • B-1 John W Barriger III Papers Finalwpref.Rtf
    A Guide to the John W. Barriger III Papers in the John W. Barriger III National Railroad Library A Special Collection of the St. Louis Mercantile Library at the University of Missouri St. Louis This project was made possible by a generous grant From the National Historical Publications and Record Commission an agency of the National Archives and Records Administration and by the support of the St. Louis Mercantile Library at the University of Missouri St. Louis © 1997 The St. Louis Mercantile Library Association i Preface and Acknowledgements This finding aid represents the fruition of years of effort in arranging and describing the papers of John W. Barriger III, one of this century’s most distinguished railroad executives. It will serve the needs of scholars for many years to come, guiding them through an extraordinary body of papers documenting the world of railroading in the first two-thirds of this century across all of North America. In every endeavor, there are individuals for whom the scope of their involvement and the depth of their participation makes them a unique participant in events of historical importance. Such was the case with John Walker Barriger III (1899-1976), whose many significant roles in the American railroad industry over almost a half century from the 1920s into the 1970s not only made him one of this century’s most important railroad executives, but which also permitted him to participate in and witness at close hand the enormous changes which took place in railroading over the course of his career. For many men, simply to participate in the decisions and events such as were part of John Barriger’s life would have been enough.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Intercity Passenger Rail
    THE BENEFITS OF INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL (110–54) HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON RAILROADS, PIPELINES, AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 26, 2007 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 36–685 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:27 Feb 08, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\DOCS\36685 HTRANS1 PsN: JASON COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE JAMES L. OBERSTAR, Minnesota, Chairman NICK J. RAHALL, II, West Virginia JOHN L. MICA, Florida PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon DON YOUNG, Alaska JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois THOMAS E. PETRI, Wisconsin ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina Columbia JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee JERROLD NADLER, New York WAYNE T. GILCHREST, Maryland CORRINE BROWN, Florida VERNON J. EHLERS, Michigan BOB FILNER, California STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas RICHARD H. BAKER, Louisiana GENE TAYLOR, Mississippi FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JERRY MORAN, Kansas ELLEN O. TAUSCHER, California GARY G. MILLER, California LEONARD L. BOSWELL, Iowa ROBIN HAYES, North Carolina TIM HOLDEN, Pennsylvania HENRY E. BROWN, JR., South Carolina BRIAN BAIRD, Washington TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON, Illinois RICK LARSEN, Washington TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts SAM GRAVES, Missouri JULIA CARSON, Indiana BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania TIMOTHY H.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Flood Contents
    Historic Flood Contents On the cover: Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station 2 Safety First shown on June 15. Safety messaging was reinforced heavily as employees fought flooding. 3 Plan Springs from Year 2000 Work Although more than a decade apart, one year impacted the other in ways that no one at OPPD could have predicted. 5 Energized Workers Protect Power Plants 10 T&D and Substation Meet Challenges 13 Counting the Cost Tracking and categorizing OPPD’s flood-related costs in pursuit of FEMA reimbursement is a huge task. 14 Arming Employees to Fight the Flood When rising waters threatened OPPD facilities, a variety of supplies and equipment were brought in to help meet challenges. 16 The Little Dam That Could Gavins Point Dam served as a critical gate to help contain the floodwaters. Without the dam, it could have been much worse. 18 Flood Hardships Can’t Dampen Spirits Sense of family – and humor – bolster OPPD employees amid property loss, lengthy commutes and months of stress. Hey, Carl, let's blow this admin parking lot. 22 News of Flood Spread Across Globe OPPD communicators used many tools to disseminate information, I hear there's more to eat over at the squelch rumors and keep flood fighters on the same track. training center lot. : Vol. 91, No. 6, November/December 2011 Published bimonthly by the Corporate Commu- Contributing Staff Senior Management nications Division, Flash magazine provides OPPD DJ Clarke Chris Cobbs W. Gary Gates ........................................President employees and retirees with strategic industry- and Django Greenblatt-Seay Jeff Hanson Dave Bannister ................................Vice President job-related news, and human-interest articles about Sharon Jefferson Mike Jones Timothy J.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 33 • NUMBER 43 Saturday, March 2, 1968 • Washington, D.C
    FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 33 • NUMBER 43 Saturday, March 2, 1968 • Washington, D.C. Pages 4087-4130 Agencies in this issue— The President Agency for International Development Atomic Energy Commission Business and Defense Services Administration Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Commodity Credit Corporation Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communications Commission Federal Maritime Commission Federal Trade Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Interior Department Internal Revenue Service Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Packers and Stockyards Administration Securities and Exchange Commission Detailed list o f Contents appears inside. 2-year Compilation Presidential Documents Code of Federal Regulations TITLE 3, 1964-1965 COMPILATION Contains the full text of Presidential Proclamations, Executive orders, reorganization plans, and other formal documents issued by the President and published in the Federal Register during the period January 1,1964- December 31, 1965. Includes consolidated tabular finding aids and a consolidated index. Price: $3.75 Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 y a \ Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National FEDERALJpEGISTER Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mall address National Area Code 202 A ® ^ Phonepi.«»- 962-8626oao_ ba9a Archives Building, Washington, D.O. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in tbe Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.O., Ch.
    [Show full text]