DOCSLIB.ORG

Coefficient of Conservatism Rankings for the Flora of Montana: Part I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coefficient of Conservatism Rankings for the Flora of Montana: Part I COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM RANKINGS FOR THE FLORA OF MONTANA : PART I Prepared for: Montana Department of Environmental Quality Prepared by: Andrea Pipp Montana Natural Heritage Program A program of the Montana State Library's Natural Resource Information System that is operated by the University of Montana. August 21, 2015 COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM RANKINGS FOR THE FLORA OF MONTANA: PART I Prepared for: MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 1520 East 6th Ave; Helena MT 59620 Agreement #215042 Prepared by: ANDREA PIPP © 2015 Montana Natural Heritage Program P.O. Box 201800 ● 1515 East Sixth Ave ● Helena, MT 59620-1800 This document should be cited as follows: Pipp, Andrea. 2015. Coefficient of Conservatism Rankings for the Flora of Montana: Part I. Report to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Helena, Montana. Prepared by the Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, Montana. 73 pp. Coefficient of Conservatism Rankings for the Flora of Montana: Part I TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .........................................................................................................i 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Expert Panel .......................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Coefficient of Conservatism Values .................................................................... 2 3.0 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 4 4.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 5 TABLES Table 1 Botanical and ecological experts serving on the 2004 and 2015 panels. Table 2 The scoring criteria used by the 2004/2005 panel for assigning C-values to species. Table 3 Summary of coefficient of conservatism scoring definitions used by the 2015 Montana panel and adopted from Zomlefer et al. 2013. Table 4 The 2013 checkist of Montana vascular plants with the revised 2015 origins and C-values. FIGURE Figure 1 The Dichotomous Key for Coefficient of Conservatism Rankings, taken from Zomlefer, W., L. Chafin, J. Carter, and D. Giannasi. 2013. Coefficient of Conservatism Rankings for the Flora of Georgia: Wetland Indicator Species. Southeastern Naturalist, 12(4): 790-808. Eagle Hill Institute. COVER PHOTOGRAPH CREDITS (left to right) Cynoglossum officinale, C-value 0: Photographed by Sue Crispin. Prunella vulgaris, C-value 2: Photographed by Drake Barton. Carex amplifolia, C-value 5: Photographed by Peter Lesica. Salix glauca, C-value 7: Photographed by Sue Crispin. Eriophorum callitrix, C-value 10: Photographed by Sabine Mellman-Brown. Coefficient of Conservatism Rankings for the Flora of Montana: Part I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Species and land conservation requires the ability to assess natural areas. The Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) is a tool that uses plants to make standardized comparisons among open land areas, to set conservation priorities, to monitor project areas, and to restore habitats. The basic component of the FQAI is the assignment of a coefficient of conservatism (C-) value to individual plant species. For a given geography, C-values reflect the plant’s tolerance to natural and/or human disturbance and its affinity to a specific, unimpaired habitat. In 2004-2005 and 2015, the Montana Natural Heritage Program assembled panels of botanical and ecological experts with field-based knowledge of Montana’s flora to assign C-values to primarily wetland species. The 2005 scoring criteria were modified by the 2015 panel, which adopted the published methodology used in Georgia (Zomlefer et al. 2013). This modification led to the re- assessment of the 2005 C-values for most exotic species and some native species. The origin of many species was also researched and updated. In total, the panels assigned C-values for 1,412 plant species or varieties in Montana. When assigning C-values in 2015, the panel found that incorporating Georgia’s method (Zomlefer et al. 2013) created greater scoring consistency among members, a better understanding of the scoring definitions, and a refinement that better distinguished neighboring values. i Coefficient of Conservatism Rankings for the Flora of Montana: Part I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was funded by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. We would like to thank Lynda Saul for her enthusiasm to develop Coefficients of Conservatism values for plants in Montana. Thank you to the Ecologists and Botanists who passionately share their knowledge of and experiences with our vascular plants in Montana: Stephen Cooper, Peter Husby, Marc Jones, Peter Lesica, Tara Luna, Mary Manning, Scott Mincemoyer, Karen Newlon, John Pierce, Ken Scow, and Steve Shelly. We also appreciate the thorough edits by Karen Newlon. Any errors or omissions in the report are entirely the responsibility of the author. ii Coefficient of Conservatism Rankings for the Flora of Montana: Part I 1.0 INTRODUCTION Conservation of our species and landscapes is accomplished through land preservation, habitat restoration, and development of effective management techniques. Species and land conservation requires the ability to assess natural areas. The Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) is a tool that uses plants to make standardized comparisons among open land areas, to set conservation priorities, to monitor project areas, and to restore habitats (Wilhelm and Masters 1995). A key component of using FQAI is to assign a Coefficient of Conservatism (C-) value to an individual plant species that is specific to a defined geography. This report outlines the practical uses of FQAI, defines the process used by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) to assign C-values to plants in Montana, and provides the C-values data. It is commonly accepted that plants and animals occupy habitats to which they are adapted (Wilhelm and Masters 1995). European settlement in North America has resulted in large and rapid changes to our native biological systems and processes. These changes include: a) the loss of conservative plants, those species that co-occur (to create diversity) and are suited to long- term inhabitancy, and b) the increase of exotic species that perpetuate with catastrophic disturbance or cultural activities. As a result, landscapes in Montana are a mosaic of intact systems and fragmented lands in varying states of degradation. Plants exhibit varying degrees of tolerance to disturbance and also display varying degrees of affinity (or fidelity) to a specific habitat integrity (the state of being unimpaired habitat) (Wilhelm and Masters 1995). For a given geography, the C-value reflects the plant species’ tolerance to natural and/or human disturbance and its fidelity to a habitat, and is scaled from 0 to 10. Plants assigned a value of 0 are habitat generalists that respond positively to disturbance while plants assigned a value of 10 occur in very specialized habitats and are intolerant of disturbance. The assigned C-value is not a reflection of the plant’s density, apparent dominance, or frequency within the defined geographical area (Wilhelm and Masters 1995). Collectively, C-values are incorporated into community-based site assessment methods, such as FQAI (Zomlefer et al. 2013). The FQAI method is used by government agencies and private consulting firms to: 1) identify natural areas, 2) facilitate comparisons among different sites (regardless of the habitat type), 3) conduct long- term monitoring of the quality of remnant lands, and 4) guide restoration efforts (Zomlefer et al. 2013; Wilhelm and Masters 1995). Most commonly, government agencies and private consulting firms have used FQAI to monitor wetland conditions in compliance with Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act. Organizations are also using FQAI and C-values in long-term ecological inventories, to develop baseline conditions, and to set habitat or vegetation targets in restoration projects. To facilitate the use of FQAI and C-value indices in Montana, it is necessary to develop C-values that reflect the species’ response to environmental conditions in Montana. In 2004-2005 and 2015, the MTNHP assembled a panel of botanical and ecological experts to assign C-values to Montana’s wetland plant species. The emphasis on ranking wetland plants came from the primary objective of the Clean Water Act which is to “maintain and restore the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”, including wetlands (Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Public Law 92-500). To date, 1,412 plant species or varieties have been assigned a C-value for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program 1 Coefficient of Conservatism Rankings for the Flora of Montana: Part I 2.0 METHODS 2.1 Expert Panel The standard methodology for assigning C-values uses an expert panel of botanists and ecologists familiar with the flora in question (Jones 2005; Rocchio 2007; and Zomlefer et al. 2013). In 2004-2005 (hereafter referred to as 2005) and 2015, the MTNHP assembled panels of botanical and ecological experts with field-based knowledge of Montana’s flora (Table 1). The emphasis in 2005
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List
    5/12/16 State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X http://wetland-plants.usace.army.mil/ Aquilegia caerulea James (Colorado Blue Columbine) Photo: William Gray List Counts: Wetland AW GP WMVC Total UPL 83 120 101 304 FACU 440 393 430 1263 FAC 333 292 355 980 FACW 342 329 333 1004 OBL 279 285 285 849 Rating 1477 1419 1504 1511 User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps Region. 3) Some state boundaries lie within two or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating will be shown in one column and the other column will be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/22 5/12/16 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velvetleaf Acalypha rhomboidea Raf. FACU FACU Common Three-Seed-Mercury Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Canyon Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer platanoides L. UPL UPL FACU Norw ay Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silver Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achillea ptarmica L.
    [Show full text]
  • 45Th Anniversary Year
    VOLUME 45, NO. 1 Spring 2021 Journal of the Douglasia WASHINGTON NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY th To promote the appreciation and 45 conservation of Washington’s native plants Anniversary and their habitats through study, education, Year and advocacy. Spring 2021 • DOUGLASIA Douglasia VOLUME 45, NO. 1 SPRING 2021 journal of the washington native plant society WNPS Arthur R. Kruckberg Fellows* Clay Antieau Lou Messmer** President’s Message: William Barker** Joe Miller** Nelsa Buckingham** Margaret Miller** The View from Here Pamela Camp Mae Morey** Tom Corrigan** Brian O. Mulligan** by Keyna Bugner Melinda Denton** Ruth Peck Ownbey** Lee Ellis Sarah Reichard** Dear WNPS Members, Betty Jo Fitzgerald** Jim Riley** Mary Fries** Gary Smith For those that don’t Amy Jean Gilmartin** Ron Taylor** know me I would like Al Hanners** Richard Tinsley Lynn Hendrix** Ann Weinmann to introduce myself. I Karen Hinman** Fred Weinmann grew up in a small town Marie Hitchman * The WNPS Arthur R. Kruckeberg Fellow Catherine Hovanic in eastern Kansas where is the highest honor given to a member most of my time was Art Kermoade** by our society. This title is given to Don Knoke** those who have made outstanding spent outside explor- Terri Knoke** contributions to the understanding and/ ing tall grass prairie and Arthur R. Kruckeberg** or preservation of Washington’s flora, or woodlands. While I Mike Marsh to the success of WNPS. Joy Mastrogiuseppe ** Deceased love the Midwest, I was ready to venture west Douglasia Staff WNPS Staff for college. I earned Business Manager a Bachelor of Science Acting Editor Walter Fertig Denise Mahnke degree in Wildlife Biol- [email protected] 206-527-3319 [email protected] ogy from Colorado State Layout Editor University, where I really Mark Turner Office and Volunteer Coordinator [email protected] Elizabeth Gage got interested in native [email protected] plants.
    [Show full text]
  • U·M·I University Microfilms International a 8Ell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road
    Patterns of homoplasy in North American Astragalus L. (Fabaceae). Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Sanderson, Michael John. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 18:39:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/184764 INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UIVn a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Vii Table of Contents
    CHAPTER VII TABLE OF CONTENTS VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED........................................................................1 Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases......................................................................1 Appendix 2: Suggested Stocking Levels......................................................................................8 Appendix 3: Known Plants of the Desolation Watershed.........................................................15 Literature Cited............................................................................................................................25 CHAPTER VII - APPENDICES & REFERENCES - DESOLATION ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS i VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases Vegetation data for the Desolation ecosystem analysis was stored in three different databases. This document serves as a data dictionary for the existing vegetation, historical vegetation, and potential natural vegetation databases, as described below: • Interpretation of aerial photography acquired in 1995, 1996, and 1997 was used to characterize existing (current) conditions. The 1996 and 1997 photography was obtained after cessation of the Bull and Summit wildfires in order to characterize post-fire conditions. The database name is: 97veg. • Interpretation of late-1930s and early-1940s photography was used to characterize historical conditions. The database name is: 39veg. • The potential natural vegetation was determined for each polygon in the analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Rubus Arcticus Ssp. Acaulis Is Also Appreciated
    Rubus arcticus L. ssp. acaulis (Michaux) Focke (dwarf raspberry): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project October 18, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, October 18). Rubus arcticus L. ssp. acaulis (Michaux) Focke (dwarf raspberry): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/rubusarcticussspacaulis.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions mentioned in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, in particular Bonnie Heidel, and the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, in particular David Anderson, for their generosity in making their records available. The data provided by Lynn Black of the DAO Herbarium and National Vascular Plant Identification Service in Ontario, Marta Donovan and Jenifer Penny of the British Columbia Conservation Data Center, Jane Bowles of University of Western Ontario Herbarium, Dr. Kadri Karp of the Aianduse Instituut in Tartu, Greg Karow of the Bighorn National Forest, Cathy Seibert of the University of Montana Herbarium, Dr. Anita Cholewa of the University of Minnesota Herbarium, Dr. Debra Trock of the Michigan State University Herbarium, John Rintoul of the Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, and Prof. Ron Hartman and Joy Handley of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium at Laramie, were all very valuable in producing this assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Okanogan County Plant List by Scientific Name
    The NatureMapping Program Washington Plant List Revised: 9/15/2011 Okanogan County by Scientific Name (1) Non- native, (2) ID Scientific Name Common Name Plant Family Invasive √ 763 Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae 3 Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple Aceraceae 800 Alisma graminium Narrowleaf waterplantain Alismataceae 19 Alisma plantago-aquatica American waterplantain Alismataceae 1155 Amaranthus blitoides Prostrate pigweed Amaranthaceae 1087 Rhus glabra Sumac Anacardiaceae 650 Rhus radicans Poison ivy Anacardiaceae 1230 Berula erecta Cutleaf water-parsnip Apiaceae 774 Cicuta douglasii Water-hemlock Apiaceae 915 Cymopteris terebinthinus Turpentine spring-parsley Apiaceae 167 Heracleum lanatum Cow parsnip Apiaceae 1471 Ligusticum canbyi Canby's lovage Apiaceae 991 Ligusticum grayi Gray's lovage Apiaceae 709 Lomatium ambiguum Swale desert-parsley Apiaceae 1475 Lomatium brandegei Brandegee's lomatium Apiaceae 573 Lomatium dissectum Fern-leaf biscuit-root Apiaceae Coeur d'Alene desert- Lomatium farinosum Apiaceae 548 parsley 582 Lomatium geyeri Geyer's desert-parsley Apiaceae 586 Lomatium gormanii Gorman's desert-parsley Apiaceae 998 Lomatium grayi Gray's desert-parsley Apiaceae 999 Lomatium hambleniae Hamblen's desert-parsley Apiaceae 609 Lomatium macrocarpum Large-fruited lomatium Apiaceae 1476 Lomatium martindalei Few-flowered lomatium Apiaceae 1000 Lomatium nudicaule Pestle parsnip Apiaceae 1477 Lomatium piperi Piper's bisciut-root Apiaceae 634 Lomatium triternatum Nine-leaf lomatium Apiaceae 1528 Osmorhiza berteroi Berter's sweet-cicely
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Alpine Vascular Flora of the Teton Range, Wyoming, with Notes on Biology and Habitat Preferences
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 41 Number 2 Article 11 6-30-1981 A checklist of the alpine vascular flora of the Teton Range, Wyoming, with notes on biology and habitat preferences John R. Spence Utah State University Richard J. Shaw Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Spence, John R. and Shaw, Richard J. (1981) "A checklist of the alpine vascular flora of the Teton Range, Wyoming, with notes on biology and habitat preferences," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 41 : No. 2 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol41/iss2/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE ALPINE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE TETON RANGE, WYOMING, WITH NOTES ON BIOLOGY AND HABITAT PREFERENCES Shaw^ John R. Spence''^ and Richard J. Abstract.— A checkHst of the vascular flora of the alpine zone (treeless vegetation above 9500 feet or 2900 m) of the Teton Range is presented. For each of the 216 species, si.x attributes are listed: flower color and shape, pollina- tion mode, life form, habitat preference, and whether each species is found in the Arctic. White and yellow flowered species are most common, and zoophilous species greatly predominate over anemophilous and apomictic species. Perennial/biennial herbs are the most common life form.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflowers of Twin Pillars North Trail, Bingham Springs, Trail Station
    Wildflowers of Twin Pillars North Trail, Bingham Springs, Trail Station Meadows & upper Desolation Canyon Mill Creek Wilderness & Ochoco National Forest Data from personal observations & Data Provided by the Oregon Flora Project & Consortium of Pacific Northwest Herbaria Taxa with a question mark have been found within 10 miles of this site but not yet documented onsite. Last updated May 28, 2018 Common Name Scientific Name Family ____ Black Elderberry Sambucus racemosa v. melanocarpa Adoxaceae ____ Bulbil Onion Allium geyeri v. tenerum Amaryllidaceae ____ Tolmie's Onion Allium tolmiei v. tolmiei Amaryllidaceae ____ Gray’s Lovage Ligusticum grayi Apiaceae ____ Slender-fruited Lomatium Lomatium leptocarpum Apiaceae ____ Gray's Desert Parsley Lomatium papilioniferum ? Apiaceae ____ Common Sweet Cicely Osmorhiza berteroi Apiaceae ____ Western Sweet Cicely Osmorhiza occidentalis Apiaceae ____ Gairdner’s Yampah Perideridia gairdneri Apiaceae ____ Sierra Snakeroot Sanicula graveolens Apiaceae ____ Mountain Dogbane Apocynum androsaemifolium Apocynaceae ____ False Solomon Seal Maianthemum racemosum ssp. amplexicauleAsparagaceae ____ Star-flowered False Solomon SealMaianthemum stellatum Asparagaceae ____ Hyacinth Cluster-lily Triteleia hyacinthina ? Asparagaceae ____ Yarrow Achillea millefolium Asteraceae ____ Pale Agoseris Agoseris glauca v. glauca Asteraceae ____ Sagebrush Agoseris Agoseris parviflora Asteraceae ____ Pearly Everlasting Anaphalis margaritacea Asteraceae ____ Pussytoes Antenaria sp. Asteraceae ____ Woodrush Pussytoes Antennaria
    [Show full text]
  • FOH Newsletter 2013
    FRIENDS Of The University Of Montana HERBARIUM Spring 2013 Montana’s Special Status Plants: Thirty Years of Tracking Rare and Threatened Plants in the Treasure State By Scott Mincemoyer, Montana Natural Heritage Program 1980, the Montana Rare Plant Project, based at the tana’s plants built upon the previous work and helped to In University of Montana, was formed with the intent clarify the conservation status of many other plants based of developing the first, comprehensive listing of rare and upon additional information accumulated from field sur- threatened plants for the state (Lesica et al. 1984). Previ- veys and herbaria specimens over the previous seven ous efforts, focused on developing a list of rare plants had years. a regional or national scope, including one for the North- As early as 1987, MTNHP applied the term “Species of ern Region of the U.S. Forest Service (Inman, Hendzel, Conservation Concern” to species that previously were and Schmautz 1971) and several iterations of lists of categorized in one of the various status categories (e.g. plants under consideration for listing as threatened or en- threatened, endangered, rare) used in the preceding publi- dangered after passage of the Federal Endangered Species cations. This was later abbreviated to Species of Concern Act (ESA) in 1973. The Montana Rare Plant Project as- (SOC), terminology that is still used today for those spe- sembled information on the state’s plant species from sev- cies that meet specific criteria of rarity and/or threats to eral herbaria, including the University of Montana, Mon- their viability (MTNHP 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • (Dr. Sc. Nat.) Vorgelegt Der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftl
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Flowers, sex, and diversity: Reproductive-ecological and macro-evolutionary aspects of floral variation in the Primrose family, Primulaceae de Vos, Jurriaan Michiel Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-88785 Dissertation Originally published at: de Vos, Jurriaan Michiel. Flowers, sex, and diversity: Reproductive-ecological and macro-evolutionary aspects of floral variation in the Primrose family, Primulaceae. 2012, University of Zurich, Facultyof Science. FLOWERS, SEX, AND DIVERSITY. REPRODUCTIVE-ECOLOGICAL AND MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY ASPECTS OF FLORAL VARIATION IN THE PRIMROSE FAMILY, PRIMULACEAE Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Jurriaan Michiel de Vos aus den Niederlanden Promotionskomitee Prof. Dr. Elena Conti (Vorsitz) Prof. Dr. Antony B. Wilson Dr. Colin E. Hughes Zürich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s ist ein zentrales Ziel in der Evolutionsbiologie, die Muster der Vielfalt und die Prozesse, die sie erzeugen, zu verstehen.
    [Show full text]
  • A Simple Gis Approach to Predicting Rare Plant Habitat: North Central Rocky Mountains, United States Forest Service, Region One
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2008 A SIMPLE GIS APPROACH TO PREDICTING RARE PLANT HABITAT: NORTH CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAINS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, REGION ONE Erin Elizabeth Nock The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Nock, Erin Elizabeth, "A SIMPLE GIS APPROACH TO PREDICTING RARE PLANT HABITAT: NORTH CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAINS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, REGION ONE" (2008). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 37. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/37 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A SIMPLE GIS APPROACH TO PREDICTING RARE PLANT HABITAT: NORTH CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAINS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, REGION ONE By Erin Elizabeth Nock Bachelor of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2002 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography, GIS/Cartography The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2008 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Anna Klene, Chair Department of Geography Dr. David Shively, Member Department of Geography Susan Rinehart, Outside Member United States Forest Service ii Nock, Erin, M.A., Spring 2008 Geography A Simple GIS Approach to Predicting Rare Plant Habitat: North Central Rocky Mountains, United States Forest Service, Region One Chairperson: Dr.
    [Show full text]