DOCSLIB.ORG

Variation in the Artifact Assemblages from Five Oxbow Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Variation in the Artifact Assemblages from Five Oxbow Sites University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1988 Variation in the artifact assemblages from five Oxbow sites Douglas Melton The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Melton, Douglas, "Variation in the artifact assemblages from five Oxbow sites" (1988). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3999. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3999 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT IN WHICH COPYRIGHT SUBSISTS, ANY FURTHER REPRINTING OF ITS CONTENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR, MANSFIELD LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA DATE : 1988 VARIATION IN THE ARTIFACT ASSEMBLAGES FROM FIVE OXBOW SITES By Douglas A. Melton B.A., University of Montana, 1981 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1988 Approved by UMI Number EP36025 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT DiassrtMkm PubJisbhg UMI EP36025 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Melton, Douglas A., M.A., April 1988 Anthropology Variation in the Artifact Assemblages from Five Oxbow Sites (184 pp.) Director: Dee C. Taylor The chipped stone tool assemblages from five Oxbow Sites were compared. The purpose of this comparison was to ascertain the nature of Oxbow as a cultural-historical unit. Was Oxbow best thought of as an archaeological phase or an archaeological complex? The terms phase and complex as they are used here, follow Reeves's (1969) use of the terms. Additionally, the comparison suggested the presence of two classes of sites. The first were short term campsites with an emphasis on butchering relatively few animals. The second class perhaps represented longer term occupation, with a greater emphasis on a variety of activities being represented. This is evidenced in the features and artifacts reported from the second class of sites. The present evidence suggests Oxbow is best thought of as a complex. Evidence from other reported Oxbow Sites is used to support this conclusion. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all the people who helped in the production of this thesis. I would like to thank my committee, Drs. Taylor, Foor, and Hampton. I particularly would like to thank my chairman, Dr. Taylor, who was able to give some grammatical sense to my otherwise incoherent rambling. Dr. Foor helped me with the statistics and analysis section of this thesis. His assistance was greatly appreciated. Mr. Alan Stanfill of the State Historic Preservation Office provided his insight to the nature of Oxbow and acted as "devil's advocate" for many of my ideas. I found these exchanges very useful. Mr John Brumley of Ethos Consultants answered my questions concerning his excavations of the Southridge Site. I thank him for his time. Mr. Tim Church did the computer graphic that appears as Figure 10. I thank him for his time and effort. Ms. Sharon Rose did her usual fine job of turning my illegible scrawl into something readable. I would also like to thank my long-suffering colleagues and fellow graduate students who have put up with my outbursts and insights into Northern Plains Prehistory. Now maybe I will be a little quieter on Friday evenings. Finally, I would like to thank the archaeologists who dug the five sites used in this thesis; without them I would not have a thesis. It is hoped that I have not greatly misinterpreted their work. As for my own analysis, I am solely responsible for any errors or misinterpretations. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES vi I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTIONS 9 A. Long Creek 12 B. Mummy Cave 16 C. Southridge 29 D. Sun River 34 III. THE OXBOW LEVELS 40 A. Long Creek 40 B. Mummy Cave 50 C. Harder 64 D. Southridge 76 E. Sun River 84 IV. SITE ANALYSIS 102 V. A SUMMARY OF OXBOW 124 A. The Oxbow Point in Space and Time 124 B. Oxbow Settlement and Subsistence Patterns 131 C. Oxbow Technological Systems 135 D. Oxbow Ceremonial and Mortuary Practices 137 E. Relationship of Oxbow to Other Projectile Point Types and Archaeological Complexes 141 F. Summary 144 VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 145 APPENDIX I. Sites Reported to Contain Oxbow Points 155 APPENDIX II. Radiocarbon Dates Associated with Sites Producing Oxbow Points 161 REFERENCES CITED 164 iv LIST OF TABLES 1. Artifacts Recovered from the Non-Oxbow Levels at the Long Creek Site, Saskatchewan 14 2. Summary of Cultures at the Long Creek Site, Saskatchewan. (From Wettlaufer and Mayer-Oakes 1960: 114) 17 3. Artifacts Recovered from the Non-Oxbow Layers at Mummy Cave, Wyoming 21 4. Artifacts Recovered from the Non-Oxbow Areas of the Southridge Site, Alberta 32 5. Artifacts Recovered from the Non-Oxbow Levels at the Sun River Site (24CA74), Montana 38 6. Artifacts Recovered from the Oxbow Levels at the Long Creek Site, Saskatchewan 42 7. Artifacts Recovered from the Oxbow Layers at Mummy Cave, Wyoming 51 8. Artifacts Recovered from the Oxbow Zone at the Harder Site, Saskatchewan 69 9. Artifacts Recovered from the Oxbow Subarea at the Southridge Site, Alberta 78 10. Artifacts Recovered from the Oxbow Levels at the Sun River Site, Montana 87 11. Frequencies and Percentages of Selected Classes of Tools from the Five Sites 106 12. Comparison of Combined Assemblages from the Long Creek, Mummy Cave and Harder Sites 114 13. Comparison of Assemblages from Mummy Cave Layers 28 and 30 and from the Harder Site 116 14. Comparison of Assemblages from Mummy Cave Layers 28 and 20 Combined and from the Harder Site 117 15. Comparison of Assemblages from Mummy Cave Layer 28 and from the Harder Site 119 16. Some Definitions of the Oxbow Point Type 126 17. The Oxbow Assemblage 134 v LIST OF FIGURES 1. Location of the Five Sites Selected for Analysis, and Showing General Distribution of Oxbow Points 3 2. Projectile Point Sequence from Mummy Cave, Wyoming, Showing Radiocarbon Dated Levels and Projectile Point Sequence. (After Wedel et al. 1968:185.) 20 3. Stratigraphy and Dates of the Levels from the Sun River Site (24CA74), Montana. (After Greiser et al. 1983:3-2.) 37 4. Plan View of Ash Concentrations in Project B, Level 8, Long Creek Site, Saskatchewan. No Scale. (After Wettlaufer and Mayer-Oakes 1960:66. ) 49 5. Plan View of Harder Site Excavations, Saskatchewan. (After Dyck 1977:29. ) 67 6. Plan View of Subarea B of the Southridge Site (EaOq-17), Alberta. (After Brumley 1981:41.) 77 7. Plan View of Level IV at the Sun River Site, Montana. (After Greiser et al. 1983:5-2.) 89 8. Plan View of Level V at the Sun River Site, Montana. (After Greiser et al. 1983:6-1.) 95 9. Plan View of Level VI at the Sun River Site, Montana. (After Greiser et al. 1983:7-2.) 98 10. Cumulative Graph of Selected Classes of Tools from the Oxbow Components at the Five Sites 107 vi I. INTRODUCTION In this thesis, I compare the artifact assemblages from five archaeological sites assigned to what is currently known as the "Oxbow Complex." Using this comparison, I attempt to answer two questions concerning the status of Oxbow in general. The first is: What exactly is Oxbow? It has been used at various times to define a point type, an archaeological complex, an archaeological phase, and an archaeological culture.1 I examine this question to see what support, if any, exists for such classifications. My second question is related to the apparent longevity of some elements of the Oxbow Complex. Why, for example, do Oxbow Points appear to have been used over such a long period of time? And, if that is so, what were the advantages provided by their continued use? To answer these questions, I have selected five sites containing excavated, largely unmixed Oxbow Components. These sites are listed below and are described in greater detail in the following chapters. The five sites I have selected are: Long Creek (Wettlaufer and Mayer-Oakes 1960) and Harder (Dyck 1977) in Saskatchewan, the Southridge Site in Alberta (Brumley 1981), Sun River in Montana (Greiser et al. 1983), and Mummy Cave in Wyoming (Husted and Edgar n.d.). I selected these sites for several reasons. First, there is at least general agreement that Oxbow was represented at all of the sites. 1The terms phase and complex, and culture, as they are used here, define increasingly more refined geographical and temporal units. In general, my usage follows that commonly found in archaeology (Reeves 1969, 1985? Willey and Phillips 1958). 1 Second, all are thought to be related, in the sense that all contain Oxbow Components, even though they are separated by space and time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visualizing Paleoindian and Archaic Mobility in the Ohio
    VISUALIZING PALEOINDIAN AND ARCHAIC MOBILITY IN THE OHIO REGION OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Amanda N. Colucci May 2017 ©Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Amanda N. Colucci B.A., Western State Colorado University, 2007 M.A., Kent State University, 2009 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Mark Seeman, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Eric Shook, Ph.D., Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. James Tyner, Ph.D. Dr. Richard Meindl, Ph.D. Dr. Alison Smith, Ph.D. Accepted by Dr. Scott Sheridan, Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geography Dr. James Blank, Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………..……...……. III LIST OF FIGURES ….………………………………………......………………………………..…….…..………iv LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………….……………..……………………x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..………………………….……………………………..…………….………..………xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY AREA AND TIMEFRAME ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Paleoindian Period ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1992
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. BOX 37127 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20013-7127 IN aEPLy a£F£K TO: The Director of the Natlonal Park service is pleased to Inform you that the fol lowing properties have been entered In the National Register of Historic Places. For further Information cal I 202/343-9542. JAN 3 1992 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/23/91 THROJc:>1 12/27/91 KEY: state. county, ProPerty Name. Address/soundary, City, vicinity, Reference Nuntier N-IL status. Action, Date, MUitipie Name ARIZONA. c.ocoNINO co..NTY. Fjrst Baptist church, 123 s. Beaver St .• Flagstaff. 91001576, IIOMINATION, 12/23/91 ARIZONA, COCONINO COl.NTY. Pendley Homestead Historic District. us 89-A, 7 ml.Nor Sedona. Sedona vicinity, 91001857, NOMINATION, 12/23/91 CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COlNTY, The Bellevue-Staten. 492 Staten Ave .. 0akland. 91001896, NOMINATION. 12/27/91 CALIFORNIA, ORANOE CQU,ITY, Casa Romantica. 415 Avenlda cranada, San Clemente. 91001900. NOMINATION, 12/27/91 COLORADO, MONTEZUMA CQU,ITY, Mancos High school, 350 crand AVe., Mancos. 91001740. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 IDAHO. CARIBCX.J cou,rry_ Largllliere, Edgar waiter sr. HOuse. 30 west second south st .• soda Springs. 91001870. NOMINATION. 12/23/91 INDIANA, MARION oou,rTY. St. Clair. 109 w. ~t. Clair St., Indianapolis, 83000085. REMOVAL. 12/04/91 (Apartments and Flats of oowntown Indianapolis TR) IOWA. ALLAMAKEE cou,rry, Lans jng Fisher les Bui !ding. Between co. HWy. X-52 and the Miss lss lppi R.. south uns ing. Lans Ing, 91001832. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 <conservation Movement in 1owa MPS) IOWA.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaliths and the Early Mezcala Urban Tradition of Mexico
    ICDIGITAL Separata 44-45/5 ALMOGAREN 44-45/2013-2014MM131 ICDIGITAL Eine PDF-Serie des Institutum Canarium herausgegeben von Hans-Joachim Ulbrich Technische Hinweise für den Leser: Die vorliegende Datei ist die digitale Version eines im Jahrbuch "Almogaren" ge- druckten Aufsatzes. Aus technischen Gründen konnte – nur bei Aufsätzen vor 1990 – der originale Zeilenfall nicht beibehalten werden. Das bedeutet, dass Zeilen- nummern hier nicht unbedingt jenen im Original entsprechen. Nach wie vor un- verändert ist jedoch der Text pro Seite, so dass Zitate von Textstellen in der ge- druckten wie in der digitalen Version identisch sind, d.h. gleiche Seitenzahlen (Pa- ginierung) aufweisen. Der im Aufsatzkopf erwähnte Erscheinungsort kann vom Sitz der Gesellschaft abweichen, wenn die Publikation nicht im Selbstverlag er- schienen ist (z.B. Vereinssitz = Hallein, Verlagsort = Graz wie bei Almogaren III). Die deutsche Rechtschreibung wurde – mit Ausnahme von Literaturzitaten – den aktuellen Regeln angepasst. Englischsprachige Keywords wurden zum Teil nach- träglich ergänzt. PDF-Dokumente des IC lassen sich mit dem kostenlosen Adobe Acrobat Reader (Version 7.0 oder höher) lesen. Für den Inhalt der Aufsätze sind allein die Autoren verantwortlich. Dunkelrot gefärbter Text kennzeichnet spätere Einfügungen der Redaktion. Alle Vervielfältigungs- und Medien-Rechte dieses Beitrags liegen beim Institutum Canarium Hauslabgasse 31/6 A-1050 Wien IC-Separatas werden für den privaten bzw. wissenschaftlichen Bereich kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt. Digitale oder gedruckte Kopien von diesen PDFs herzu- stellen und gegen Gebühr zu verbreiten, ist jedoch strengstens untersagt und be- deutet eine schwerwiegende Verletzung der Urheberrechte. Weitere Informationen und Kontaktmöglichkeiten: institutum-canarium.org almogaren.org Abbildung Titelseite: Original-Umschlag des gedruckten Jahrbuches.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Artifact Found on San Clemente Island Mass Communication Specialist 2Nd Class Shawnte Bryan July 16, 2013 (U.S
    Santa Cruz Archaeological Society Newsletter Rare Artifact Found on San Clemente Island Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Shawnte Bryan July 16, 2013 (U.S. Navy Story Number: NNS130716-29) The Navy discovered a significant prehistoric artifact 90 miles west of San Diego on San Clemente Island (SCI) located mid-island at a newly discovered archeological site. A boat effigy made of submarine volcano lava was spotted at the surface of the site during an archeology survey. The boat effigy represents a type of boat used by the California Indians who occupied the California Channels and adjacent southern California mainland at the time of the Spanish "discovery" in the AD 1500s. Dr. Andy Yatsko, Senior Archaeologist and Region Southwest Archaeologist for the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest in San Diego, who has over 40 years experience in prehistoric and historic archaeology finds the boat effigy to be an uncommon find. "Boat effigies like the one found are exceedingly rare in the archaeological record, with this being my first one recovered during my 30 year tenure with SCI," said Dr. Yatsko [image courtesy U.S. Navy]. "Finding artifacts on the surface of archaeological sites at the island is not unusual, but a rare one like this is always exciting to come across." The effigy was created from submarine volcano lava. This lava differs from the lava that flows on the mainland because the vesicles are smaller, making it more brittle and more difficult to handle. “The vesicle volcanic material used is hard and brittle but somehow they were able to craft a fine little carving out of it to represent an important part of their culture," said Yatsko.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier History of Coshocton
    Frontier History of Coshocton By Scott E. Butler, Ph. D. Frontier History of Coshocton First printing 2020 Library of Congress Control Number: 2020915741 Copyright 2020 Scott E. Butler Copyright of photographs, maps and illustrations remains with persons or institutions credited. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-578-75019-4 Printed by Carlisle Printing Sugarcreek, Ohio Cover art is a digital photo of an oil-on-canvas painting by the author’s father, Dr. John G. Butler, a veterinarian in Coshocton for many years. He enjoyed painting animals. Manufactured in the United States of America on acid-free paper. Open Your Eyes and Ears and Clear Your Mind and Listen to What I Have to Say – Adapted from customary opening words of northeast Native American conferences among tribes and nations and with white people in the 18th Century. Dedicated to the people of Coshocton, that present and future generations may know the truth about the grand history of their place in the world. Contents Page # Preface i Acknowledgements ii Illustrations iii Maps iv Terminology v Sources vi Chapter Page # 1. Introduction & the Pre-European Era 1 2. Mary Harris 21 3. Early Habitation of Ohio after 1701 40 4. The Conflict Begins 56 5. The War Years in Ohio 66 6. Recovery in Coshoctonia 78 7. Delaware Survival in Coshoctonia 107 8. Delaware Revival in Coshoctonia 118 9. Conversions and Conflicts 133 10. Coshoctonia on January 1, 1775 168 11. Resolution and Revolution 178 12. Lichtenau & New Leaders 197 13. Peace and War 209 14. Alliance and Breakdown 234 15. Fort Laurens 253 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C
    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates Xii H
    [Ru)Ioc!RBo1, Vol.. 10, 1968, P. 61-114] UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN RADIOCARBON DATES XII H. R. CRANE and JAMES B. GRIFFIN The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan The following is a list of dates obtained since the compilation of List XI in December 1965. The method is essentially the same as de- scribed in that list. Two C02-CS2 Geiger counter systems were used. Equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961). Dates and estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conferences of 1962 and 1965, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half-life, 5570 yr, (b) A.D. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale, and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and in- cluding VII, we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statisti- cal errors of counting, to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many sources of error in the dating process, we suggest doubling the figures that are given in this list. We wish to acknowledge the help of Patricia Dahlstrom in pre- paring chemical samples and David M. Griffin and Linda B. Halsey in preparing the descriptions. I. GEOLOGIC SAMPLES 9240 ± 1000 M-1291. Hosterman's Pit, Pennsylvania 7290 B.C. Charcoal from Hosterman's Pit (40° 53' 34" N Lat, 77° 26' 22" W Long), Centre Co., Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Art Studies: a Bibliographic Database Page 1 800 Citations: Compiled by Leigh Marymor 04/12/17
    Rock Art Studies: A Bibliographic Database Page 1 800 Citations: Compiled by Leigh Marymor 04/12/17 Keywords: Peterborough, Canada. North America. Cultural Adams, Amanda Shea resource management. Conservation and preservation. 2003 Reprinted from "Measurement in Physical Geography", Visions Cast on Stone: A Stylistic Analysis of the Occasional Paper No. 3, Dept. of Geography, Trent Petroglyphs of Gabriola Island, BCMaster/s Thesis :79 pgs, University, 1974. Weathering. University of British Columbia. Cited from: LMRAA, WELLM, BCSRA. Keywords: Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada. North America. Stylistic analysis. Marpole Culture. Vision. Alberta Recreation and Parks Abstract: "This study explores the stylistic variability and n.d. underlying cohesion of the petroglyphs sites located on Writing-On-Stone Provincial ParkTourist Brochure, Alberta Gabriola Island, British Columbia, a southern Gulf Island in Recreation and Parks. the Gulf of Georgia region of the Northwest Coast (North America). I view the petroglyphs as an inter-related body of Keywords: WRITING-ON-STONE PROVINCIAL PARK, ancient imagery and deliberately move away from (historical ALBERTA, CANADA. North America. "THE BATTLE and widespread) attempts at large regional syntheses of 'rock SCENE" PETROGLYPH SITE INSERT INCLUDED WITH art' and towards a study of smaller and more precise PAMPHLET. proportion. In this thesis, I propose that the majority of petroglyphs located on Gabriola Island were made in a short Cited from: RCSL. period of time, perhaps over the course of a single life (if a single, prolific specialist were responsible for most of the Allen, W.A. imagery) or, at most, over the course of a few generations 2007 (maybe a family of trained carvers).
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint
    Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts by Amanda Nicole Mullett December, 2009 Thesis written by Amanda Nicole Mullett B.A. Western State College, 2007 M.A. Kent State University, 2009 Approved by _____________________________, Advisor Dr. Mark F. Seeman _____________________________, Chair, Department of Anthropology Dr. Richard Meindl _____________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... v List of Appendices .................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi Chapter I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 II. Background ...................................................................................................................5 The Environment.............................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Testing at Allenbrook (9Fu286), Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area, Roswell, Georgia
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AT ALLENBROOK (9FU286), CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, ROSWELL, GEORGIA Chicora Research Contribution 547 ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AT ALLENBROOK (9FU286), CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, ROSWELL, GEORGIA Prepared By: Michael Trinkley, Ph.D. Debi Hacker Prepared For: National Park Service Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area 1978 Island Ford Parkway Atlanta, Georgia 30350 Contract No. P11PC50748 ARPA Permit No. CHAT 2012-001 CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 547 Chicora Foundation, Inc. PO Box 8664 Columbia, SC 29202 803-787-6910 www.chicora.org December 3, 2012 This report is printed on permanent paper ∞ MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The investigations were conducted in saprolite rock that was designated Level 2 and compliance with ARPA Permit CHAT 2012-001 extended from 0.07 to 0.17m bs. This zone under contract with the National Park Service to represented fill and no artifacts were identified. examine archaeological features that may be associated with the foundation wall of the Level 3 was slightly deeper, extending Allenbrook House (9FU286, CHAT-98) and from 0.17 to 0.35m and consisted of identical determine if archaeological evidence of a previous compact mottled red (2.5YR 4/4) clay and porch on the south façade of the structure could saprolite rock that graded into a red clay (2.5YR be identified. 4/6) and saprolite rock. This fill was also sterile. The work was conducted by Dr. Michael Level 4 extended from 0.35 to 0.48m and Trinkley, RPA (who was on-site during the entire consisted of red clay (2.5YR 4/6) and saprolite project), Ms. Debi Hacker, and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Site Inventory (ASI) Form
    WISCONSIN ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM (PAPER-27 NOV 2001-FINAL PO 10 JAN 2002) CODE # 47- COUNTY FIELD # Name (limit 25 characters) Other Name LOCATIONAL INFORMATION (See Appendix B) Civil Town(s) Town# N, Range# E or W, Section# Quarter-sections (minimum 3) Quarter-section Grid Alignment (edge and corner) USGS Quad (7.5) Other Legal Descriptions ❒ French Lot ❒ Gov. Lot ADDITIONAL TRS DATA (IF APPROPRIATE) Civil Town Town# N, Range# E or W, Section# Quarter-sections (minimum 3) Quarter-section Grid Alignment (edge and corner) USGS Quad (7.5) Other Legal Descriptions: ❒ French Lot ❒ Gov. Lot UTM Coordinates: ❒ Zone ❒ Easting ❒ Northing Method: ❒ Interpolated from USGS Quad ❒ GPS Field GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION & RELATIONSHIP TO LANDSCAPE FEATURES SITE DESCRIPTION INFORMATION SITE/FEATURE DESCRIPTION SITE TYPE(S) (Check all that apply. See Appendix D for definitions .) ❒ Cabin/homestead ❒ Cache/pit/hearth ❒ Campsite/village ❒ Cave/rockshelter ❒ CCC/WPA site ❒ Cemetery/burials ❒ Church ❒ Corn hills/garden beds ❒ Cultural Site ❒ Dam/historic earthwork ❒ Dock/pier/crib ❒ Enclosure/earthworks ❒ Experimental ❒ Farmstead ❒ Fish weir/trap ❒ Foundation/depressions ❒ HCM concentration ❒ Ice House ❒ Isolated find ❒ Kill site/bone bed ❒ Kiln ❒ Lithic scatter ❒ Logging camps ❒ Military site ❒ Mill/sawmill ❒ Mound(s)-conical ❒ Mound(s)-effigy ❒ Mound(s)- linear ❒ Mound(s)-other ❒ Paleontological ❒ Quarry/mine ❒ Redeposited artifacts ❒ Rock art ❒ Rock feature/petroform ❒ School ❒ Shell midden ❒ Shipwreck ❒ Sugarbush ❒ Tower ❒ Trading/fur post ❒ Traditional Cultural Property ❒ Transportation site ❒ Workshop site ❒ Unknown ❒ Other: FOR WHS OFFICE USE: ❒ CHK’D ❒ GIS ❒ GIS CHK’D ❒ ENTER ❒ ENTRY CHK’D ❒ ASI# HP-06-02P (rev. 09/2002) CULTURAL AFFILIATION (Check all that apply. Using certainty of affiliation: 1= definite, 2= probable, 3= possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College Version June 20, 2012
    1 Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College version June 20, 2012 Introduction I began accumulating this bibliography around 1996, making notes for my own uses. Since I have access to some obscure articles, I thought it might be useful to put this information where others can get at it. Comments in brackets [ ] are my own comments, opinions, and critiques, and not everyone will agree with them. The thoroughness of the annotation varies depending on when I read the piece and what my interests were at the time. The many articles from atlatl newsletters describing contests and scores are not included. I try to find news media mentions of atlatls, but many have little useful info. There are a few peripheral items, relating to topics like the dating of the introduction of the bow, archery, primitive hunting, projectile points, and skeletal anatomy. Through the kindness of Lorenz Bruchert and Bill Tate, in 2008 I inherited the articles accumulated for Bruchert’s extensive atlatl bibliography (Bruchert 2000), and have been incorporating those I did not have in mine. Many previously hard to get articles are now available on the web - see for instance postings on the Atlatl Forum at the Paleoplanet webpage http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/forums/26/t/WAA-Links-References.html and on the World Atlatl Association pages at http://www.worldatlatl.org/ If I know about it, I will sometimes indicate such an electronic source as well as the original citation. The articles use a variety of measurements. Some useful conversions: 1”=2.54
    [Show full text]