DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Map of the Witter Quadrangle, Madison County, Arkansas DGM-AR-00926 Geology by Richard S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geologic Map of the Witter Quadrangle, Madison County, Arkansas DGM-AR-00926 Geology by Richard S Arkansas Geological Survey Digital Geologic Quadrangle Map Bekki White, Director and State Geologist Witter Quadrangle, Arkansas Geologic Map of the Witter Quadrangle, Madison County, Arkansas DGM-AR-00926 Geology by Richard S. Hutto and Garrett A. Hatzell 2018 7256 III SE (HARTWELL) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WITTER QUADRANGLE ARKANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7256 II SE Trace Creek Shale - dark gray to black shale, locally 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) o 7256 II SW Ùat 93 45' 4 000m HUNTSVILLE 7 MI. (KINGSTON) Correlation of Map Units interbedded with thin- to medium-bedded claystone, siltstone, Stratigraphic Column 33 E 434 4 4 o A 35 36 42'30" 2.7 MI. TO ARK. 74 o S (HUNTSVILLE) R 26 W 4 4 36 00' R 25 W 40' 40 1 510 000 FEET 42 443 93 37'30" and sandstone. Sandstone is very fine to coarse grained. o 36 00' Locally, near the base, a 20- to 25-foot (6- to 7-meter)-thick, Ùat Ùbd 610 000 thin- to thick-bedded or massive, friable sandstone unit is FEET Holocene & present. Unconformable with the underlying Kessler Limestone Qat Qls Quaternary SystemSeries Member Formation Pleistocene of the Bloyd Formation. Ranges from 80 to 240 feet (24 to 73 900 Unconformity meters) thick. Ùa o5 Ùa Bloyd Formation (Lower Pennsylvanian, Morrowan) - o o Atokan composed of shale, sandstone, and limestone units divided o Ù at Ù 250 3 o 3 at into several Members. From youngest to oldest they are: 5 800 3983000m N 3 3983 Kessler Limestone, Dye Shale, Parthenon sandstone, and Ùbp 3 o Unconformity Brentwood Limestone. In the Bloyd type area at Bloyd Mountain, 20 miles (32 kilometers) west in Washington Ùbd 6 County, the Woolsey Shale is present between the Brentwood Q Qat Limestone and Dye Shale. Here, this interval is occupied by ls o o Ù Qls bp the Parthenon sandstone. On the Witter quadrangle, the 700 Pennsylvanian Ùhc Parthenon sandstone is a prominent bluff-former along War 4 Unconformity Eagle Creek. Ranges from 140 to 180 feet (43 to 55 meters) Qls 200 thick. Ùbb Morrowan Ùat Kessler Limestone - sandy, fossiliferous, commonly Ùa Ù 39 bd oncolitic limestone. Light gray on fresh surfaces, weathers 82 Ù 3982 600 at Ùhp dark gray. Fossils include: crinoids, tabulate and rugose orals, Atoka brachiopods, trilobites, bryozoans, and shark teeth. Sandy Unconformity intervals are commonly cross bedded. Locally contains coal Atokan Ù 6 hp o Ùhc fragments, phosphatic pebbles, and conglomeratic beds. Because this unit is so thin, it is mapped with the Dye Shale. Qls Ùat Unconformity Areas where the Kessler crops out extensively in stream 500 150 Ùbp beds are marked with a black, stippled pattern. Ùbb Mp Chesterian Mississippian Conformable with the underlying Dye Shale. Ranges from 5 to 15 feet (1.5 to 5 meters) thick. Greenland 3981 3981 Dye Shale - mostly gray to black shale. Locally contains ironstone concretions. Locally interbedded with thin- to 5 400 o Ùbp medium-bedded sandstone and siltstone. Conformable with the underlying Parthenon sandstone. Ranges from 40 to 100 Ùbd Ùa Ozark Plateaus feet (12 to 30 meters) thick. Trace Creek Mp Parthenon sandstone - thin- to massive-bedded, very fine- 100 Ù bd Ùbp to coarse-grained, micaceous sandstone. Tan on fresh 300 surfaces, weathers tan to brown. Commonly exhibits tabular Ùhc Springfield Salem cross-bedding. Commonly contains white quartz granules and 4 Ùa Ùhp pebbles. Unconformable with the underlying Brentwood Kessler o Limestone. Ranges from 10 to 40 feet (3 to 12 meters) thick. 3980 o 3980 Brentwood Limestone - thin- to thick-bedded, Dye 200 Pennsylvanian 4 Ùbb fossiliferous limestone, locally interbedded with sandy 3 o Bloyd Boston Mountains limestone, dark-gray to black shale, and light-gray siltstone. 50 Parthenon 7 Limestone is light gray on fresh surfaces and weathers light o o o gray to white. Locally exhibits cross-bedding. Locally contains Ùhc Brentwood 57' 30" Qat Ùhp Witter quadrangle phosphatic pebbles and abundant invertebrate fossils, 4 57' 30" including: crinoids, tabulate and rugose corals, brachiopods, 100 Morrowan o 3 4 bryozoans, and blastoids. Conformable with the underlying Prairie Grove o Witter quadrangle location within the Boston Mountains. Prairie Grove Member of the Hale Formation. Shale. Ranges Hale S 5 from 30 to 40 feet (9 to 12 meters) thick. 3979 Cane Hill 7 o Hale Formation (Lower Pennsylvanian, Morrowan) - is Mississippian/Chesterian Pitkin 0 ft. 0 m Ùbb composed of interbedded sandstone, siltstone, shale, and JAPTON 4 MI. Introduction limestone units divided into two Members: the Prairie Grove Ùbp and the Cane Hill. Up to 160 feet (49 meters) thick. Harlow Hollow Monocline Ù bd Prairie Grove - thin to massive-bedded, very fine- to S This map depicts the bedrock and surficial geology of Ù unconformable sandstone cross-bedded shale hp medium-grained, limy sandstone or sandy limestone with o Q the 7.5-minute Witter quadrangle. In this area, approximately ls Ùat lenses of relatively pure fossiliferous and oolitic limestone. surface sandstone Ùat 940 feet (287 meters) of Mississippian (Chesterian) to 5 Light gray to light brown on fresh surfaces and weathers dark Ùa Pennsylvanian (Atokan) carbonate and clastic rocks are VENUS 2 MI. 39 S brown. Commonly cross-bedded, locally in a herringbone 78 exposed. These rocks formed from sediment deposited in distal Ùhc pattern. Honeycomb weathering is common. Fossils include: to near shore marine, tidal, deltaic, and fluvial environments. shale with calcareous limestone 5 crinoids, brachiopods, gastropods, tabulate and rugose corals, The quadrangle is situated on the northern part of the Boston siltstone sandstone ammonoids, and trilobites. Unconformable with the underlying o Mountains Plateau, the southernmost and highest of three Cane Hill. Ranges from 40 to 80 feet (12 to 24 meters) thick. 5 broad plateau surfaces in northern Arkansas known as the Cane Hill - interbedded, dark-gray silty shale, siltstone, Ozark Plateaus Province. This province is part of the Interior Ù (! (! o hc o and thin- to thick-bedded, very fine- to fine-grained, micaceous (! (! Highlands Physiographic Region and was developed by (! 4 (! sandstone. Tan to light gray on fresh surfaces, weathers tan to (! (! (! (! (! differential erosion of sedimentary units deposited on the (! Ù p gray. Flaser-bedding and ripple-bedding are common. Locally (! (! (! b (! (! (! (! ! (! (! ( flanks of the Ozark Dome, a volcanic structure formed during (! (! (! (! (! calcareous. The lower contact with the Pitkin Limestone is (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! the Precambrian, which is centered in southeast Missouri. (! (! (! o (! (! (! unconformable and marks the Mississippian-Pennsylvanian (! 7255 IV NE IV 7255 (! (JAPTON) The Harlow Hollow Monocline and a small fault near (! (! 7255 I NE (! (! boundary in northern Arkansas. Just above this contact, a 2- (! (! (! (! o (! Slow Tom Hollow in War Eagle Creek are the only observed (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (WEATHERS) (! 6 o to 3-foot (0.6- to 0.9-meter)-thick conglomerate composed of (! (! (! structures in the mapped area. War Eagle Creek is a tributary (! (! Ù (! (! Ù o hp bd o black phosphate pebbles, gray to black limestone pebbles, (! 3 (! (! 7 to the White River which runs for approximately 13 miles (21 (! 3 o 5 oolitic limestone pebbles, oolitic phosphate pebbles, and (! Ùa kilometers) through the quadrangle and reveals excellent (! (! (! (! o crinoid fragments is locally present. Unconformable with the (!(! (! (! 3 4 (! exposures of bedrock. (! (! (!(! o (! (! underlying Pitken Limestone. Ranges from 40 to 80 feet (12 to (!(! (! (! (! (! Previous work in this area includes a geological (! 3 o 24 meters) thick. (! (! (! (! 7 (! (! (! (! (! worksheet by B. R. Haley, circa 1976, employing (!(! (! o (! (! (! (! (! (! (! photogeological methods and Master’s theses by R. A. Berry, (! (! (! (! (! o (! (! (! o (! (! (! 4 5 Pitkin Limestone (Upper Mississippian, Chesterian) - (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! circa 1978, and M. R. Shinn, circa 1979. The current mapping (! (! ^ Mp micritic to coarsely crystalline, thin- to thick-bedded, (! (! 3976 5 3976 (! (! o project is based primarily on data collected from field (! (! (! 6 fossiliferous limestone. Light to dark gray on fresh and (! (! (!(! (!(! (! (! (! (!(! (! observations made between July, 2017 and February, 2018. (! (! 5 (! (!(! weathered surfaces. Exposures are limited to an area along (! (! (! Ùa (! (! These data, along with site locations, were recorded in a (! (! (! Qls (! (! Ù (! (! (! (! (! hc War Eagle Creek near Harlow Hollow. Up to10 feet (3 meters) (! (!(! (! (! (! 4 (! (! (! (! o (! (! (!(! (! (! (! ! geodatabase on a portable data collector/global positioning (!( (! (! ! 2 Ù thick. (!(! ( (! at (! (! (! (! (! o satellite receiver. Representative rock samples were collected at (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! o Ù various sites to aid in classification and for future petrographic (! (!(! (! hp ( (! ! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (!(! (!(! (! (! (! (! studies. (! (! (! (! (! Ù (! (! at (! (! (! (! (! 3 Qls (! (! (! (! (! (! (! o (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (!(! (! (! (! (! (! (!(! (! (! (! 39 39 (! (! (!(! (! 75 75 Description of Map Units (! (! (! (! (! (! (!(! (! (! T 15 N (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! 55' (! (! (! (! (! (! (! Q 55' (! at Alluvium and terrace deposits (Quarternary) - (! (! (! (! Qat (! (! (! (! unconsolidated gravel, sand, silt, and clay deposited by (! (! (!(! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! T 14 N streams on one or more terrace levels. ! (! (! (! (! ( (! (! (! (! (!(! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! o T 15 N (! (! (! Landslide deposits (Quaternary) - unsorted,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revised Bedrock Geology of War Eagle Quadrangle, Benton County, Arkansas Robert A
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 56 Article 27 2002 Revised Bedrock Geology of War Eagle Quadrangle, Benton County, Arkansas Robert A. Sullivan University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Stephen K. Boss University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Geographic Information Sciences Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation Sullivan, Robert A. and Boss, Stephen K. (2002) "Revised Bedrock Geology of War Eagle Quadrangle, Benton County, Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 56 , Article 27. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol56/iss1/27 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 56 [2002], Art. 27 Revised Bedrock Geology of War Eagle Quadrangle, Benton County, Arkansas Robert A. Sullivan and Stephen K.Boss* Department of Geosciences 113 Ozark Hall University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701 ¦"Corresponding Author Abstract A digital geologic map of War Eagle quadrangle (WEQ) was produced at the 1:24000 scale using the geographic information system (GIS) software ArcView® by digitizing geological contacts onto the United States Geological Survey (USGS) digital raster graphic (DRG).
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver Watershed Alliance Food Sources, and Holistic Community Quality USDA NRCS to Manage Vegetation (Nrcs.Usda
    Sugar 62 Loaf Panorama 187 Bella L Point 72 Elkhorn Williams Devil’s Eye Brow BB EE AAVista VV EE RR Natural Area LL AA KK EE Pea Ridge National Henry Trimble Round Military Indian Lake Pea Park Creek 187 Leatherwood WATERSHEDS Glasscock Gentry WATERSHEDS BENTON Ridge CARROL Watersheds are separated BEAVER LAKE WATERSHED Garfield Dam Site River Park by topographic divides off Source water from 7 sub-watersheds Rich Dam Site North Park which water flows to one side flows into Beaver Lake/White River. or the other. Beaver Lake- Indian Creek Park USACE/Beaver Dam 187 White River WS 62 Humphery Dam Site Lake Park Lake Sequoyah-WR WS Pond Beaver Dam Middle Fork-WR WS 94 Carroll-Boone Water District War Eagle Lost Bridge Public Rolloff West Fork-WR WS Creek WS Avoca Lost Miles Richland Creek Use Area Creek WS “Two Ton” Benton/Washington Bridge Hollow Sugar Headwaters of Posy Regional Public Ford WR WS Water Authority Village Starkey Public Use Area 62 Coose Little Flock Hollow Like stacking bowls, a watershed W may be part of one that is larger and W Grindstone also have any number of smaller Prairie Creek Ventris “SUB-WATERSHEDS” inside it. Beaver Lake Park Pond The WHITE RIVER flows 722 miles from Project Office North its HEADWATERS near Boston, Arkansas in Larue the Beaver Lake Watershed, Clifty northward into Missouri, then Prairie 23 Creek south to the lowest point in Lake Creek 3D21 Buck its watershed where it joins Atalanta Rocky Branch the Arkansas RIver, ultimately Former 12 Park draining into the MISSISSIPPI Water Supply RIVER.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2018 Data Report
    August 2012 – November 2018 Data Report Prepared by: Angela Danovi Beaver LakeSmart / StreamSmart Coordinator Ozarks Water Watch 1200 W. Walnut Street, Suite 3405 Rogers, AR 72756 Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................iii Water Quality Parameter Descriptions ............................................................................................................................... iii Alkalinity ......................................................................................................................................................................... iii Conductivity.................................................................................................................................................................... iii pH ................................................................................................................................................................................... iv Total Dissolved Solids ...................................................................................................................................................... v Total Nitrogen ................................................................................................................................................................. v Total Phosphorus ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Analysis of Madison County in Northwest Arkansas
    November 1, 2003 PART TWO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR SUBMITTAL TO AND APPROVAL OF THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION Post Office Box 8913 Little Rock AR 72219-8913 Phone (501) 682-0602 Fax (501) 682-0611 www.adeq.state.ar.us Minimum Requirements for Regional Solid Waste Management Plans 1 November 1, 2003 Due Date November 1, 2004, Followed By Annual Updates Minimum Requirements for Regional Solid Waste Management Plans 2 November 1, 2003 PART TWO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Regional Solid Waste Management Plans Preface Part Two – Minimum Requirements for Regional Solid Waste Management Plans, is presented pursuant to the requirements set forth by the 83rd Arkansas General Assembly in Act 1376 of 2001, codified in Statute as Arkansas Code Annotated (A.C.A.) §8-6-1901 et al. Act 1376 of 2001 specifically charges the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality with establishing minimum requirements for the development of new waste management plans by Regional Solid Waste Management Boards. The new plans will replace those previously required by Act 870 of 1989, codified as A.C.A. §8-6-701 et al. Act 1376 of 2001 directs that the requirements include, at a minimum, requirements for: 1. STRATEGIC PLANNING 2. REPORTING 3. PUBLIC NOTICE AND PARTICIPATION 4. SERVICES 5. SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS AND ISSUES The Department addresses this directive by requiring that each Regional Solid Waste Management Board respond to the established requirements set forth in this document, known as Part Two – Minimum Requirements for Regional Solid Waste Management Plans, which is a supplement to Part One – The Statewide Solid Waste Management Plan for Arkansas.
    [Show full text]
  • War Eagle Creek Watershed Drinking Water Source for War Eagle Creek Watershedis One of Seven Subwatersheds in the Beaver Lake Watershed
    Northwest Arkansas’ Beaver Lake is the War Eagle Creek Watershed drinking water source for War Eagle Creek Watershedis one of seven subwatersheds in the Beaver Lake Watershed. one in eight Beaver Lake Watershed is a part of the White River Watershed. Arkansans. Blackburn Creek Polecat Mountain 23 MADISON CARROLL Pension Mountain Bluff Field Mountain White Hobbs State Park Swain Mountain River Stanley Mountain Beaver Lake Sandstone Mountain Madison County Flower Pot Point Watershed Mississippi Wilderness Management Area River Lookout Samuel Mountain Warm Fork ARKANSAS Kenars Mountain War Eagle Mill 127 BEAVER LAKE Ozark Natural Science Center Bear Hollow Natural Area Piney Creek Clear Creek Best 12 Rockhouse Creek Clifty Creek War Eagle Creek Clifty 23 Madison County Beaver Lake Watershed is a Wilderness Management Area subwatershed of the White River Basin. The White River is a tributary of the Mississippi River. BENTON 45 WAR WASHINGTON 303 EAGLE Pine Creek Nob Hill CREEK Water from War Eagle 21 412 Been Mountain Forum Dry Fork 23S Creek Watershed and other Withrow Springs State Park subwatersheds flows in a Roberts Creek BEAVER LAKE- 303 HINDSVILLE LAKE WHITE RIVER Whitener Branch 412 Alabam northerly direction Hindsville Tater Hill 23 127 Vaughan Mountain into Beaver Lake. War Eagle Creek 412 45 Smyrna Branch Old Berry Branch Keefer Mountain Alabam 412 Horine Mountain Slaven Mountain Goshen Diera Mountain Mill Branch Carlock Mountain Big Onion Creek Boatright Creek Benson Mountain Kings River Dry Creek Bohannan Mountain Mitchell Branch
    [Show full text]
  • A Eutrophication Model of the White River Basin Above Beaver Reservoir in Northwest Arkansas Robert A
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Technical Reports Arkansas Water Resources Center 1-1-1973 A Eutrophication Model of the White River Basin Above Beaver Reservoir in Northwest Arkansas Robert A. Gearhart University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Dee Mitchell University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Louis Thibodeaux University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Richard Meyers University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/awrctr Part of the Fresh Water Studies Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Gearhart, Robert A.; Mitchell, Dee; Thibodeaux, Louis; and Meyers, Richard. 1973. A Eutrophication Model of the White River Basin Above Beaver Reservoir in Northwest Arkansas. Arkansas Water Resources Center, Fayetteville, AR. PUB015. 109 This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Arkansas Water Resources Center at ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Reports by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A EUTROPHICATION MODEL OF THE WHITE RIVER BASIN ABOVE BEAVER RESERVOIR IN NORTHWEST ARKANSAS by Robert A. Gearheart WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH CENTER Publication No. 15 In Cooperation With ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION Research Report No. 22 UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE 1973 PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT PROJECT NO.: B-012-ARK AGREEMENT NO.: 14-01-0001-1877 Starting Date:
    [Show full text]
  • River Sediment Quality of the Upper White River Basin
    The Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute (OEWRI) Missouri State University (MSU) Upper White River Basin Monitoring Program Geomorphic Channel Assessment Year 1 (2008-2009) River Sediment Quality of the Upper White River Basin Prepared by: Robert T. Pavlowsky & Derek J. Martin Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute College of Natural and Applied Sciences Missouri State University Springfield, MO [email protected] 417-836-8473 Field Assistants: Marc Owen, Heather Hoggard, W. Patrick Dryer, Jackie Ebert, Patrick Womble, David Speer, & Erin Hutchison Prepared for: John Moore Upper White River Basin Foundation P.O. Box 6218 Branson, MO 65615 [email protected] January 21, 2010 OEWRI EDR-10-001 1 River Sediment Quality of the Upper White River Basin By Robert T. Pavlowsky and Derek J. Martin Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute Missouri State University Springfield, MO January 21, 2010 INTRODUCTION The Upper White River Basin Foundation (UWRBF) implemented a water quality monitoring program in the Upper White River Basin in 2008 (www.whiteriverbasin.org). The goal of this program is to provide a long-term and consistent source of water quality and stream health information on the major rivers and tributaries draining into the upper portion of the White River including Beaver Lake, AR, Table Rock Lake, MO, and Bull Shoals Lake, MO/AR. It involves several partners including the United States Geological Survey (USGS), University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, Bull Shoals Field Station (BSFS) at Missouri State University-Springfield (MSU), and Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute (OEWRI) at MSU. The Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute at Missouri State University (oewri.missouristate.edu) is responsible for protocol development, data collection, and trend analysis to support the geomorphology and watershed source monitoring components of the basin-wide stream monitoring program in the Upper White River Basin in Missouri and Arkansas (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver Lake Watershed News
    Beaver Lake Watershed News Being Thankful for Landowner Involvement and Interest Hello Beaver Lake Watershed Resident, Landowner, or Manager, Wow, we are making some progress toward maintaining and improving the water quality of Beaver Lake and its watershed! This progress is largely Winter 2016 due to your interest in taking care of natural resources and your participa- This newsletter is being sent tion in learning more and establishing to you because our records show that you own or reside best management practices on your on streamside property in property. To you, the Beaver Water- the Beaver Lake Watershed. shed Alliance gives thanks. If you are If you would prefer to re- just a casual reader of this newsletter ceive a digital copy only or up to this point, and have not yet have your name removed entirely from this mailing list, checked in about how we might be please notify the Beaver able to work together, I hope that you Watershed Alliance by call- will continue to read and will check in with us at some point. Chances are that you have ing 479-750-8007. some forest, pasture, streamside, lakeside, lawn and garden, landscape, construction site, wildlife or other management goals or needs where best management tips can not only Inside this issue: save you some money, but also produce healthy wildlife, and clean water. We‟ll be here when you are ready to check in, and hope you keep reading along until that time comes! Being Thankful 1 for Landowners Beaver Lake Watershed Volunteer Spotlight War Eagle 2 Watershed News Connecting with 3 War Eagle Landowners Streamside 3 Landowner Workshop Set for March 5th Land Conservation: 4 What Are Your The Greenland High School EAST Program The Northwest Arkansas Master Naturalists assist Options? monitors a stream restoration sight on the in preparing our newsletter to be mailed out to West Fork White River you.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Water Resources Center
    Arkansas Water Resources Center PREDICTION AND MANAGEMENT OF SEDIMENT LOAD AND PHOSPHORUS IN THE BEAVER RESERVOIR WATERSHED USING A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM By J.M. McKimmey and H.D. Scott Department of Agronomy University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Publication No. PUB-165 June 1993 Arkansas Water Resources Center 112 Ozark Hall University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 PREDICTION AND MANAGEMENTOF SEDIMENT LOAD AND PHOSPHORUSIN THE BEAVER RESERVOIR WATERSHEDUSING A GEOGRAPHICINFORMATION SYSTEM J. M. MCKIMMEYand H. D. SCOTT Department of Agronomy Fayetteville, AR 72701 Research Project Technica' Completion Report Project The research on which this report is based was financed in part by the United States Department of the Interior as authorized by the Water Research and Development Act of 1984 (P. L. 98-242) Arkansas Water Resources Research Center University of Arkansas 113 Ozark Hall Fayetteville, AR 72701 Publication No. 165 June, 1993 Contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute their endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Government. The University of Arkansas, in compliance with federal and state laws and regulations governing affirmative action and nondiscrimination, does not discriminate in the recruitment, admission and employment of students, faculty and staff in the operation of any of its educational programs and activities as defined by law. Accordingly, nothing in this publication should be viewed as directly or indirectly expressing any limitation, specification or discrimination as to race, religion, color, or national origin; or to handicap, age, sex, or status as a disabled Vietnam-era veteran, except as provided by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1-Purpose and Need INTRODUCTION
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOREST SERVICE SOUTHERN REGION STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED JANUARY 2005 REVISED LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN MANAGEMENT BULLETIN R8-MB-123B Ozark-St. Francis National Forest Offices Supervisor’s Office 605 West Main Street Russellville, Arkansas 72801 479-968-2354 Bayou Ranger District Boston Mountain Ranger District 12000 SR 27 1803 North 18th Street Hector, AR 72843 Ozark, AR 72949 479-284-2015 479-667-5807 Buffalo Ranger District Mt. Magazine Ranger District Highway 7 North 3001 East Walnut Street Jasper, AR 72641 Paris, AR 72855 870-446-5122 479-9633076 Pleasant Hill Ranger District St. Francis National Forest Highway 21 North 2675 Highway 44 Clarksville, AR 72830 Marianna, AR 72360 479-754-2864 870-295-5278 Sylamore Ranger District Cass Job Corps Highway 14 North 21424 North Highway 23 Mountain View, AR 72560 Ozark, AR 72949 870-269-3228 479-667-3686 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250- 9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • August 17, 2009 Rodney Reynolds, Manager Madison County Water
    August 17, 2009 Rodney Reynolds, Manager Madison County Water Facilities Board P.O. Box 606 Huntsville, Arkansas 72740 RE: Madison County Water Line Installation Project AFIN: N/A NPDES Permit No.: ARR150000 Dear Mr. Reynolds: On August 13, 2009, I performed a stormwater discharge permit compliance inspection of the above-referenced project in response to a complaint. The complainant was concerned that various permits required for the construction project may not have been obtained. The inspection was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Control Act, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. This inspection revealed the following violations: 1. The Notice of Coverage (NOC) was not posted in a publicly accessible location near where construction is actively underway as required for linear projects. This is in violation of Part 1.B.8.C of the permit. Copies of the NOC should be posted at each active construction location. During our phone conversation today, you stated that this phase of the project will ultimately disturb less than 5 acres. As such, your construction project is automatically covered by the permit. A copy of the NOC can be obtained from the Water Division’s Construction Stormwater webpage. 2. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was not prepared prior to commencement of construction activity. This is in violation Part II.A of the permit. A SWPPP must be prepared and implemented in accordance with Part II.A of the permit, and the plan must follow the order outlined in Part II.A.4-7 of the permit.
    [Show full text]
  • West Fork White River Watershed
    West Fork White River Watershed Data Inventory and Nonpoint Source Pollution Assessment Prepared by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Preservation Division for the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission December 3, 2004 WEST FORK-WHITE RIVER WATERSHED - DATA INVENTORY AND NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION ASSESSMENT ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DIVISION Final Report FY99 CWA Section 319(h) December 3, 2004 ADEQ Project Team Project Manager and Principal Investigator: Sandi J. Formica Project Engineer: Matt Van Eps Field and Technical Resource: Tony Morris Field and Technical Resource: Jason Beck Engineering and Technical Resource: Amy Cotter Puneet Srivastava – Project Engineer from 01/2000 to 05/2001 West Fork White River Project Partners & Acknowledgements Contributors - the project team would like to thank the contributors for their time, expertise, and the work they performed in the WFWR watershed in cooperation with this project: · Continuous Monitoring Station: Dr. Marc Nelson, AWRC · Biological Assessment Survey: Dr. Art Brown, Andrea Radwell, and Robin Reese · Bank Material Characterization: Dr. Kris Brye Technical Assistance - the project team would like to thank the following people for providing assistance and their expertise on the project: · Allen Clingingpeel of the Ouachita National Forrest Service (ONFS) was invaluable in providing information and guidance on evaluating the roadways in the watershed. Allen provided us with methods developed by ONFS on relevant field data collection and assistance on how to use the WEPP: Roads model. With Allen’s guidance, the data collected along with the modeling effort can be used to develop a maintenance plan and to track improvements. Allen also provided us with his expertise and experience on evaluating sediment on a watershed scale.
    [Show full text]