DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental and Hydrologic Setting of the Ozark Plateaus Study Unit, Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental and Hydrologic Setting of the Ozark Plateaus Study Unit, Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma ENVIRONMENTAL AND HYDROLOGIC SETTING OF THE OZARK PLATEAUS STUDY UNIT, ARKANSAS, KANSAS, MISSOURI, AND OKLAHOMA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4022 NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL AND HYDROLOGIC SETTING OF THE OZARK PLATEAUS STUDY UNIT, ARKANSAS, KANSAS, MISSOURI, AND OKLAHOMA by James C. Adamski, James C. Petersen, David A. Freiwald, and Jerri V. Davis U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4022 NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Little Rock, Arkansas 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Earth Science Information Center 401 Hardin Road Open-File Reports Section Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract....................................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and scope .........................................................................................................................................................4 Location.........................................................................................................................................................................5 Previous investigations .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Environmental setting..............................................................................................................................................................7 Climate Suzanne R. Femmer ..............................................................................................................................................7 Physiography .................................................................................................................................................................7 Ozark Plateaus Province......................................................................................................................................7 Salem Plateau ..........................................................................................................................................12 Springfield Plateau ..................................................................................................................................14 Boston Mountains....................................................................................................................................14 Central Lowland and Coastal Plain Provinces...................................................................................................14 Osage Plains ............................................................................................................................................14 Mississippi Alluvial Plain........................................................................................................................14 Geologic Setting ..........................................................................................................................................................15 Stratigraphy .......................................................................................................................................................15 Precambrian units ....................................................................................................................................15 Cambrian and Ordovician units...............................................................................................................15 Silurian and Devonian units.....................................................................................................................20 Mississippian units ..................................................................................................................................20 Pennsylvanian units .................................................................................................................................21 Post-Paleozoic units.................................................................................................................................21 Structural geology..............................................................................................................................................21 Geological history..............................................................................................................................................21 Soils .............................................................................................................................................................................22 Population Richard W. Bell...................................................................................................................................................22 Land Use Suzanne R. Femmer ............................................................................................................................................25 Water use Richard W. Bell...................................................................................................................................................28 Surface water .........................................................................................................................................................................28 Major rivers, tributaries, and reservoirs.......................................................................................................................28 White River........................................................................................................................................................31 Neosho-Illinois Rivers .......................................................................................................................................31 Osage River .......................................................................................................................................................36 Gasconade River................................................................................................................................................36 Meramec River ..................................................................................................................................................36 St. Francis River ................................................................................................................................................40 Black River ........................................................................................................................................................40 Stream morphology .....................................................................................................................................................40 Runoff and streamflow ................................................................................................................................................43 Water quality................................................................................................................................................................50 Ground water .........................................................................................................................................................................51 Hydrogeology ..............................................................................................................................................................51 Western Interior Plains confining system ..........................................................................................................51 iii Contents Springfield Plateau aquifer................................................................................................................................ 55 Ozark confining unit ......................................................................................................................................... 55 Ozark aquifer..................................................................................................................................................... 56 St. Francois confining unit ................................................................................................................................ 57 St. Francois aquifer ........................................................................................................................................... 57 Basement confining unit ................................................................................................................................... 57 Water quality ............................................................................................................................................................... 57 Factors that affect water quality............................................................................................................................................ 59
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baylor Geological Studies
    BAYLORGEOLOGICA L STUDIES PAUL N. DOLLIVER Creative thinking is more important than elaborate FRANK PH.D. PROFESSOR OF GEOLOGY BAYLOR UNIVERSITY 1929-1934 Objectives of Geological Training at Baylor The training of a geologist in a university covers but a few years; his education continues throughout his active life. The purposes of train­ ing geologists at Baylor University are to provide a sound basis of understanding and to foster a truly geological point of view, both of which are essential for continued professional growth. The staff considers geology to be unique among sciences since it is primarily a field science. All geologic research in­ cluding that done in laboratories must be firmly supported by field observations. The student is encouraged to develop an inquiring ob­ jective attitude and to examine critically all geological concepts and principles. The development of a mature and professional attitude toward geology and geological research is a principal concern of the department. Frontis. Sunset over the Canadian River from near the abandoned settlement of Old Tascosa, Texas. The rampart-like cliffs on the horizon first inspired the name "Llano Estacado" (Palisaded Plain) among Coronado's men. THE BAYLOR UNIVERSITY PRESS WACO, TEXAS BAYLOR GEOLOGICAL STUDIES BULLETIN NO. 42 Cenozoic Evolution of the Canadian River Basin Paul N. DoUiver BAYLOR UNIVERSITY Department of Geology Waco, Texas Spring 1984 Baylor Geological Studies EDITORIAL STAFF Jean M. Spencer Jenness, M.S., Editor environmental and medical geology O. T. Ph.D., Advisor, Cartographic Editor what have you Peter M. Allen, Ph.D. urban and environmental geology, hydrology Harold H. Beaver, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Mapping from Aerial Photography in the Boston Mountains, Northwestern Arkansas Mikel R
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 31 Article 31 1977 Geologic Mapping from Aerial Photography in the Boston Mountains, Northwestern Arkansas Mikel R. Shinn Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Geomorphology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation Shinn, Mikel R. (1977) "Geologic Mapping from Aerial Photography in the Boston Mountains, Northwestern Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 31 , Article 31. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol31/iss1/31 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 31 [1977], Art. 31 Geologic Mapping from AerialPhotography in The Boston Mountains, Northwest Arkansas MIKELR.SHINN Department of Geology, University ofArkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 ABSTRACT Aerial photography has been employed to map stratigraphic and structural features in the Boston Mountains of Washington and Crawford Counties, Arkansas. Exposures of resis- tant stratigraphic units within the lower Atoka Formation were delineated on a series of large scale aerial photographs over an area of about 150 square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Notropis Girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis Tetranema)
    Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Species Status Assessment Report for the Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) Arkansas River shiner (bottom left) and peppered chub (top right - two fish) (Photo credit U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Version 1.0a October 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, NM This document was prepared by Angela Anders, Jennifer Smith-Castro, Peter Burck (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) – Southwest Regional Office) Robert Allen, Debra Bills, Omar Bocanegra, Sean Edwards, Valerie Morgan (USFWS –Arlington, Texas Field Office), Ken Collins, Patricia Echo-Hawk, Daniel Fenner, Jonathan Fisher, Laurence Levesque, Jonna Polk (USFWS – Oklahoma Field Office), Stephen Davenport (USFWS – New Mexico Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office), Mark Horner, Susan Millsap (USFWS – New Mexico Field Office), Jonathan JaKa (USFWS – Headquarters), Jason Luginbill, and Vernon Tabor (Kansas Field Office). Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema), version 1.0, with appendices. October 2018. Albuquerque, NM. 172 pp. Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 INTRODUCTION (CHAPTER 1) The Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) are restricted primarily to the contiguous river segments of the South Canadian River basin spanning eastern New Mexico downstream to eastern Oklahoma (although the peppered chub is less widespread). Both species have experienced substantial declines in distribution and abundance due to habitat destruction and modification from stream dewatering or depletion from diversion of surface water and groundwater pumping, construction of impoundments, and water quality degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Txu-Oclc-2601092.Pdf
    BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY The University of Texas Austin, Texas 78712 l'eter T. Flawn, Director Report of Investigations—No. 51 Relation of Ogallala Formation to the Southern High Plains in Texas By John C. Frye and A. Byron Leonard March 1964 Contents Page Abstract 5 Introduction 5 Regional physiography 8 The Ogallala Formation and the High Plains surface 10 Fossil seeds of the Ogallala Formation 11 Pleistocene dissection of the High Plains margin 14 Abandoned Panther Valley 15 Lake Lomax 17 Fossil molluscan assemblages 18 Conclusions 20 References 20 Index . 24 - Illustrations Figures Page Index of central-western Texas location 1. map showing of profiles and fossil localities . 7 2. Regional profiles in central-western Texas 9 abandoned Panther the 3. Profiles across Lake Lomax and Valley in of and Glasscock counties - 16 Big Spring area Howard, Martin, Plate I. Field views 22 Relation of Ogallala Formation to the Southern High Plains in Texas JOHN C. FRYE 1 and A. BYRON LEONARD^ ABSTRACT Studies along the southern and south- Pliocene and Pleistocene valley is de- scribed of Edwards Plateau eastern borders of the High Plains have across a prong the of outliers of south of and the drainage of demonstrated presence Big Spring, Lake Lomax is de- fossiliferous Ogallala Formation in Borden the late Pleistocene in and Scurry counties and have documented termined to have occurred pre-Bradyan Wisconsinan lime. A the occurrence of Pliocene deposition as far meaningful physio- be- The limit of cannot be drawn southeast as Sterling County. graphic boundary southern limits of the characteristic Ash Hollow seed floras is ex- tween the High Plains and the Edwards Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding the Missouri Valley the Politics of Dam Site Selection and Design
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Summer 1997 Flooding The Missouri Valley The Politics Of Dam Site Selection And Design Robert Kelley Schneiders Texas Tech University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Schneiders, Robert Kelley, "Flooding The Missouri Valley The Politics Of Dam Site Selection And Design" (1997). Great Plains Quarterly. 1954. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/1954 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. FLOODING THE MISSOURI VALLEY THE POLITICS OF DAM SITE SELECTION AND DESIGN ROBERT KELLEY SCHNEIDERS In December 1944 the United States Con­ Dakota is 160 feet high and 10,700 feet long. gress passed a Rivers and Harbors Bill that The reservoir behind it stretches 140 miles authorized the construction of the Pick-Sloan north-northwest along the Missouri Valley. plan for Missouri River development. From Oahe Dam, near Pierre, South Dakota, sur­ 1946 to 1966, the United States Army Corps passes even Fort Randall Dam at 242 feet high of Engineers, with the assistance of private and 9300 feet long.! Oahe's reservoir stretches contractors, implemented much of that plan 250 miles upstream. The completion of Gar­ in the Missouri River Valley. In that twenty­ rison Dam in North Dakota, and Oahe, Big year period, five of the world's largest earthen Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavin's Point dams dams were built across the main-stem of the in South Dakota resulted in the innundation Missouri River in North and South Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • “Sent out by Our Great Father”
    “Sent Out By Our Great Father” Zebulon Montgomery Pike’s Journal and Route Across Kansas, 1806 edited by Leo E. Oliva ebulon Montgomery Pike, a lieutenant in the First U.S. Infantry, led an exploring expe- dition in search of the source of the Mississippi River in 1805–1806. Soon after his return to St. Louis in July 1806, General James Wilkinson sent Lieutenant Pike, promoted to cap- tain a few weeks later, to explore the southwestern portion of the Louisiana Purchase, de- parting from the military post of Belle Fontaine near St. Louis on July 15, 1806. His expedition began as Meriwether Lewis and William Clark were nearing completion of their two-year expedition up the Missouri River and across the mountains to the Pacific Ocean and back. Pike crossed present Mis- Zsouri, most of the way by boat on the Missouri and Osage Rivers, where he delivered fifty-one mem- bers of the Osage tribe to the village of the Grand Osage in late August. On September 3 Pike entered present Kansas at the end of the day. His command, including Lieutenant James B. Wilkinson (son of General Wilkinson), Dr. John H. Robinson (civilian surgeon accompanying the ex- pedition), interpreter Antoine François “Baronet” Vásquez (called Baroney in the journal), and eighteen en- listed men, was accompanied by several Osages and two Pawnees as guides. Because of bad feelings between the Osage and Kansa Indians, some of Pike’s Osage guides turned back, and those who continued led his party a Leo E. Oliva, a native Kansan and a former university professor, became interested in frontier military history during the centennial celebration of the founding of Fort Larned in 1959 and has been researching and writing about the frontier army ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Arkansas River – Derby to Ark City
    LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit (AU): Lower Arkansas River – Derby to Ark City Water Quality Impairment: Chloride 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Ark River (Derby), Ark River (Oxford), Ark River (Ark City), South Fork Ninnescah River, Ninnescah River, Slate Creek, Unmonitored Basin County: Cowley, Sumner, Sedgwick, Kingman, Pratt, Kiowa HUC 8: 11030013, 11030015, 11030016, 11060001 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): 11030013020(050) 11030013030(010, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090) 11030015010(010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090) 11030015030(010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060) 11030016010(010, 020, 030, 040, 050) 11030016020(010, 020, 030) 11060001040(010) Ecoregion: Central Great Plains, Wellington-McPherson Lowland (27d) Flint Hills (28) Drainage Area: 1,653 square miles Main Stem Segments: 11030013 (AU Station 528): Slate Cr (17) (AU Station 281): Arkansas R (3-part) (AU Station 527): Arkansas R (2-part, 3-part, 18) (AU Station 218): Arkansas R (1, 2-part) 11030015 (AU Station 036): S.F. Ninnescah R (1,3,4,6) 11030016 (AU Station 280): Ninnescah R (1,3,8) 11060001 (AU Station 218): Arkansas R (14, 18) 1 Main Stem Segments with Tributaries by HUC 8 and Watershed/Station Number: Table 1 (a-f) a. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Slate Creek Station 528 Slate Cr (17) (partial) Winser Cr (32) Antelope Cr (25) Beaver Cr (29)* Hargis Cr (24)* Oak Cr (26)* Spring Cr (27)* * Not impaired b. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Arkansas River (Derby) Station 281 Arkansas R (3 - part) Spring Cr (37) c. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Arkansas River (Oxford) Station 527 Arkansas R (2 -part) Spring Cr (34) Lost Cr (23) Arkansas R (18) Arkansas R (3 - part) Bitter Cr (28) Dog Cr (531) d.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
    58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Table Rock Lake 2014 Annual Lake Report
    TABLE ROCK LAKE 2014 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region March 1, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table Rock Lake is a 43,100 acre reservoir owned and operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The reservoir is operated for flood control and hydroelectric production as its primary purposes under the current congressional project authorization. Recreation was also added as a project purpose in 1996. Table Rock Lake is located in the Missouri counties of Barry, Stone, and Taney and the Arkansas counties of Boone and Carroll. The Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) coordinates fisheries management activities following the December 2003 Lake Management Plan. In 2014, Southwest Fisheries staff assisted Blind Pony hatchery staff with paddlefish broodstock collections in March. Staff also conducted electrofishing sampling for Walleye in the James River in March and electrofished for black bass and crappie on nine separate nights from April 21 through May 7 in the Kings, James, Upper White, Mid-White, and Long Creek arms. Southwest Fisheries staff also assisted MDC’s Resource Science Division (RSD) with trawling efforts in the upper portions of the James River Arm in June. Black Bass Largemouth Bass comprised the majority of the black bass sampled in 2014 with a dominant year class of Largemouth Bass from 2011 making up the majority of the fish sampled (Figure 1). The highest catch rates of Largemouth Bass in the spring 2014 electrofishing samples occurred in the James and Kings River arms with over 300 Largemouth Bass sampled per hour. The 2011 year class of Largemouth Bass ranged from 13 – 14.5 inches in the spring of 2014 and these fish should exceed 15 inches by the spring of 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri River Floodplain from River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St
    Hydrogeomorphic Evaluation of Ecosystem Restoration Options For The Missouri River Floodplain From River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Minneapolis, Minnesota Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02 Mickey E. Heitmeyer Joseph L. Bartletti Josh D. Eash December 2015 HYDROGEOMORPHIC EVALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION OPTIONS FOR THE MISSOURI RIVER FLOODPLAIN FROM RIVER MILE (RM) 670 SOUTH OF DECATUR, NEBRASKA TO RM 0 AT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Refuges and Wildlife Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Mickey E. Heitmeyer Greenbrier Wetland Services Advance, MO 63730 Joseph L. Bartletti Prairie Engineers of Illinois, P.C. Springfield, IL 62703 And Josh D. Eash U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 3 Water Resources Branch Bloomington, MN 55437 Greenbrier Wetland Services Report No. 15-02 December 2015 Mickey E. Heitmeyer, PhD Greenbrier Wetland Services Route 2, Box 2735 Advance, MO 63730 www.GreenbrierWetland.com Publication No. 15-02 Suggested citation: Heitmeyer, M. E., J. L. Bartletti, and J. D. Eash. 2015. Hydrogeomorphic evaluation of ecosystem restoration options for the Missouri River Flood- plain from River Mile (RM) 670 south of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri. Prepared for U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3, Min- neapolis, MN. Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02, Blue Heron Conservation Design and Print- ing LLC, Bloomfield, MO. Photo credits: USACE; http://statehistoricalsocietyofmissouri.org/; Karen Kyle; USFWS http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/cdm/; Cary Aloia This publication printed on recycled paper by ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroclimatology of the Missouri River Basin
    Hydroclimatology of the Missouri River Basin E. Wise, C. Woodhouse, G. McCabe, G. Pederson, and J. St-Jacques Corresponding author: Erika K. Wise Department of Geography, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Hall, Campus Box 3220 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3220 [email protected] 1 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 2 3 T-tests between teleconnection indices and streamflow 4 Based on the GPH and SST patterns described in section 4a and shown in Figures 7-9 of 5 the main text, we tested the association between teleconnection indices and streamflow in the 6 Upper Missouri River Basin (UMRB) and Lower Missouri River Basin (LMRB) in the 7 corresponding year and one year prior to the streamflow year. For estimates of ocean– 8 atmosphere oscillations of potential importance to the basin, we used the following indices 9 (Table S1): mean November-March North Pacific Index (NPI) for 1912-2011 as a measure of the 10 strength of the Aleutian Low (Trenberth and Hurrell, 1994); the mean October-March PNA to 11 estimate meridional versus zonal flow (Wallace and Gutzler, 1981; Leathers et al., 1991); the 12 mean June through November Southern Ocean Index (SOI) as a measure of the atmospheric 13 component of ENSO (Ropelewski and Jones, 1987; Redmond and Koch, 1991); the mean 14 October through March and April through July NAO to estimate Atlantic pressure patterns 15 (Hurrell 1995; Jones et al., 1997); and the mean water-year AMO as a measure of Atlantic SSTs 16 (Enfield et al., 2001; McCabe et al. 2004). 17 Time series of the climate indices for 1912-2011 were compared with time series of 18 naturalized water-year streamflow for 86 river records, including 18 naturalized records from the 19 main stem of the Missouri River from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas V. Oklahoma: Restoring the Notion of Partnership Under the Clean Water Act Katheryn Kim Frierson [email protected]
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 1997 | Issue 1 Article 16 Arkansas v. Oklahoma: Restoring the Notion of Partnership under the Clean Water Act Katheryn Kim Frierson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Recommended Citation Frierson, Katheryn Kim () "Arkansas v. Oklahoma: Restoring the Notion of Partnership under the Clean Water Act," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 1997: Iss. 1, Article 16. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1997/iss1/16 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Arkansas v Oklahoma: Restoring the Notion of Partnership Under the Clean Water Act Katheryn Kim Friersont The long history of interstate water pollution disputes traces the steady rise of federal regulatory power in the area of environ- mental policy, culminating in the passage of the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1972.1 Arkansas v Oklahoma2 is the third and latest Supreme Court decision involving interstate water pol- lution since the passage of the 1972 amendments. By all ac- counts, Arkansas is wholly consistent with the Court's prior decisions. In Milwaukee v Illinois3 and InternationalPaper Co. v Ouellette,4 the Court held that the Clean Water Act ("CWA") preempted all traditional common law and state law remedies. Consequently, states lost much of their traditional authority to direct water pollution policies. Despite the claim that the CWA intended "a regulatory 'partnership' between the Federal Govern- ment and the source State", Milwaukee and InternationalPaper placed states in a subordinate position to the federal govern- t B.A.
    [Show full text]