Chapter 1-Purpose and Need INTRODUCTION
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOREST SERVICE SOUTHERN REGION STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED JANUARY 2005 REVISED LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN MANAGEMENT BULLETIN R8-MB-123B Ozark-St. Francis National Forest Offices Supervisor’s Office 605 West Main Street Russellville, Arkansas 72801 479-968-2354 Bayou Ranger District Boston Mountain Ranger District 12000 SR 27 1803 North 18th Street Hector, AR 72843 Ozark, AR 72949 479-284-2015 479-667-5807 Buffalo Ranger District Mt. Magazine Ranger District Highway 7 North 3001 East Walnut Street Jasper, AR 72641 Paris, AR 72855 870-446-5122 479-9633076 Pleasant Hill Ranger District St. Francis National Forest Highway 21 North 2675 Highway 44 Clarksville, AR 72830 Marianna, AR 72360 479-754-2864 870-295-5278 Sylamore Ranger District Cass Job Corps Highway 14 North 21424 North Highway 23 Mountain View, AR 72560 Ozark, AR 72949 870-269-3228 479-667-3686 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250- 9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer Ozark-St. Francis National Forests Baxter, Benton, Conway, Crawford, Franklin, Johnson, Logan, Madison, Marion, Newton, Pope, Search, Stone, Van Buren, Washington, Yell, Lee, and Phillips Counties in Arkansas US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Robert Jacobs, Regional Forester USDA Forest Service Southern Region 1720 Peachtree Road. NW Atlanta, GA 30367-9102 For Information: Gary Knudsen, Acting Forest Supervisor Ozark-St. Francis National Forests 605 West Main Street Russellville, Arkansas 75801 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ABSTRACT The Forest Service proposes to revise the Land and Resource Management Plan (1986) for the Ozark-St. Francis National Forests. The proposal updates the management goals, objectives, standards, and monitoring requirements for the ten- year planning period beginning when the revised Plan is approved. In addition, the proposal includes new management area prescriptions. Revised management direction is developed for all of the lands and resources on the Ozark-St. Francis National Forests. COMMENTS Reviewers should provide the Forest Service with their comments during the review period of the draft environmental impact statement. The review period begins when EPA publishes the notice of availability of the DEIS in the Federal Register. The comment period will last 90 days beginning the day the Notice of Availability is published in the Federal Register. This will enable the Forest Service to analyze and respond to the comments at one time and use information acquired in the preparation of the final environmental impact statement, thus avoiding undue delay in the decision-making process. Reviewers have an obligation to structure their participation in the National Environmental Policy Act process so that it is meaningful and alerts the agency to the reviewer’s position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,553 (1978). Environmental objections that could have been raised at the draft stage may be waived if not raised until after completion of the Final Environmental Impact Statement. City of Angoon v. Hodel (9th Circuit, 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334,1338 (E.D. Wis 1980). Comments on the draft environmental impact statement should be specific and should address the adequacy of the statement and the merits of the alternatives discussed (40 CFR 1503.3). Send Comments to: Cary Frost, Forest Plan Revision Team Ozark-St. Francis National Forests 605 W. Main Street Russellville, AR 72801 Comments must be received within 90 days of publishing in the federal register. Ozark-St. Francis National Forests Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1-Purpose and Need INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................1-1 PROPOSED ACTION .....................................................................................................................................1-2 FOREST PLAN DECISIONS ............................................................................................................................1-2 SUPPORTING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS.......................................................................................1-3 FOREST PROFILE ........................................................................................................................................1-4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................................................................1-4 PLANNING PROCESS ...................................................................................................................................1-4 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ISSUES................................................................................................................1-5 PLANNING PROCESS RECORDS.....................................................................................................................1-6 CHAPTER 2 ALTERNATIVES INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................2-1 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT........................................................................................................................2-1 CONSISTENCY WITH RESOURCES PLANNING ACT .............................................................................................2-2 ALTERNATIVES ELIMINATED FROM DETAILED STUDY ........................................................................................2-2 MINIMUM MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVE..........................................................................................................2-3 REASONS MINIMUM MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVE ELIMINATED FROM DETAILED STUDY .......................................2-3 SIERRA CLUB ALTERNATIVE2-.......................................................................................................................2-5 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED IN DETAIL..........................................................................................................2-8 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................ 2-14 Issue 1–Mix of Recreation Opportunities..................................................................................... 2-16 Issue 2–Public Access................................................................................................................... 2-19 Issue 3–Special Areas ................................................................................................................... 2-21 Issue 4–Ecosystem Health and Sustainability............................................................................. 2-25 Issue 5–Relationship of National Forest Management to Communities and Economies......... 2-31 Conformance with Renewable Resources Planning Act RPA ...................................................... 2-32 CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................3-1 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROGRAMMATIC AND SITE SPECIFIC ANALYSIS............................................................3-1 TYPES OF EFFECTS .....................................................................................................................................3-2 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT............................................................................................................................3-2 DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICAL UNITS ............................................................................................................3-2 GEOLOGIC RESOURCES ...............................................................................................................................3-5 SOILS....................................................................................................................................................