Chapter 1-Purpose and Need INTRODUCTION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 1-Purpose and Need INTRODUCTION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOREST SERVICE SOUTHERN REGION STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED JANUARY 2005 REVISED LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN MANAGEMENT BULLETIN R8-MB-123B Ozark-St. Francis National Forest Offices Supervisor’s Office 605 West Main Street Russellville, Arkansas 72801 479-968-2354 Bayou Ranger District Boston Mountain Ranger District 12000 SR 27 1803 North 18th Street Hector, AR 72843 Ozark, AR 72949 479-284-2015 479-667-5807 Buffalo Ranger District Mt. Magazine Ranger District Highway 7 North 3001 East Walnut Street Jasper, AR 72641 Paris, AR 72855 870-446-5122 479-9633076 Pleasant Hill Ranger District St. Francis National Forest Highway 21 North 2675 Highway 44 Clarksville, AR 72830 Marianna, AR 72360 479-754-2864 870-295-5278 Sylamore Ranger District Cass Job Corps Highway 14 North 21424 North Highway 23 Mountain View, AR 72560 Ozark, AR 72949 870-269-3228 479-667-3686 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250- 9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer Ozark-St. Francis National Forests Baxter, Benton, Conway, Crawford, Franklin, Johnson, Logan, Madison, Marion, Newton, Pope, Search, Stone, Van Buren, Washington, Yell, Lee, and Phillips Counties in Arkansas US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Robert Jacobs, Regional Forester USDA Forest Service Southern Region 1720 Peachtree Road. NW Atlanta, GA 30367-9102 For Information: Gary Knudsen, Acting Forest Supervisor Ozark-St. Francis National Forests 605 West Main Street Russellville, Arkansas 75801 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ABSTRACT The Forest Service proposes to revise the Land and Resource Management Plan (1986) for the Ozark-St. Francis National Forests. The proposal updates the management goals, objectives, standards, and monitoring requirements for the ten- year planning period beginning when the revised Plan is approved. In addition, the proposal includes new management area prescriptions. Revised management direction is developed for all of the lands and resources on the Ozark-St. Francis National Forests. COMMENTS Reviewers should provide the Forest Service with their comments during the review period of the draft environmental impact statement. The review period begins when EPA publishes the notice of availability of the DEIS in the Federal Register. The comment period will last 90 days beginning the day the Notice of Availability is published in the Federal Register. This will enable the Forest Service to analyze and respond to the comments at one time and use information acquired in the preparation of the final environmental impact statement, thus avoiding undue delay in the decision-making process. Reviewers have an obligation to structure their participation in the National Environmental Policy Act process so that it is meaningful and alerts the agency to the reviewer’s position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,553 (1978). Environmental objections that could have been raised at the draft stage may be waived if not raised until after completion of the Final Environmental Impact Statement. City of Angoon v. Hodel (9th Circuit, 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334,1338 (E.D. Wis 1980). Comments on the draft environmental impact statement should be specific and should address the adequacy of the statement and the merits of the alternatives discussed (40 CFR 1503.3). Send Comments to: Cary Frost, Forest Plan Revision Team Ozark-St. Francis National Forests 605 W. Main Street Russellville, AR 72801 Comments must be received within 90 days of publishing in the federal register. Ozark-St. Francis National Forests Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1-Purpose and Need INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................1-1 PROPOSED ACTION .....................................................................................................................................1-2 FOREST PLAN DECISIONS ............................................................................................................................1-2 SUPPORTING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS.......................................................................................1-3 FOREST PROFILE ........................................................................................................................................1-4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................................................................1-4 PLANNING PROCESS ...................................................................................................................................1-4 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ISSUES................................................................................................................1-5 PLANNING PROCESS RECORDS.....................................................................................................................1-6 CHAPTER 2 ALTERNATIVES INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................2-1 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT........................................................................................................................2-1 CONSISTENCY WITH RESOURCES PLANNING ACT .............................................................................................2-2 ALTERNATIVES ELIMINATED FROM DETAILED STUDY ........................................................................................2-2 MINIMUM MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVE..........................................................................................................2-3 REASONS MINIMUM MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVE ELIMINATED FROM DETAILED STUDY .......................................2-3 SIERRA CLUB ALTERNATIVE2-.......................................................................................................................2-5 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED IN DETAIL..........................................................................................................2-8 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................ 2-14 Issue 1–Mix of Recreation Opportunities..................................................................................... 2-16 Issue 2–Public Access................................................................................................................... 2-19 Issue 3–Special Areas ................................................................................................................... 2-21 Issue 4–Ecosystem Health and Sustainability............................................................................. 2-25 Issue 5–Relationship of National Forest Management to Communities and Economies......... 2-31 Conformance with Renewable Resources Planning Act RPA ...................................................... 2-32 CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................3-1 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROGRAMMATIC AND SITE SPECIFIC ANALYSIS............................................................3-1 TYPES OF EFFECTS .....................................................................................................................................3-2 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT............................................................................................................................3-2 DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICAL UNITS ............................................................................................................3-2 GEOLOGIC RESOURCES ...............................................................................................................................3-5 SOILS....................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Revised Bedrock Geology of War Eagle Quadrangle, Benton County, Arkansas Robert A
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 56 Article 27 2002 Revised Bedrock Geology of War Eagle Quadrangle, Benton County, Arkansas Robert A. Sullivan University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Stephen K. Boss University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Geographic Information Sciences Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation Sullivan, Robert A. and Boss, Stephen K. (2002) "Revised Bedrock Geology of War Eagle Quadrangle, Benton County, Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 56 , Article 27. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol56/iss1/27 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 56 [2002], Art. 27 Revised Bedrock Geology of War Eagle Quadrangle, Benton County, Arkansas Robert A. Sullivan and Stephen K.Boss* Department of Geosciences 113 Ozark Hall University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701 ¦"Corresponding Author Abstract A digital geologic map of War Eagle quadrangle (WEQ) was produced at the 1:24000 scale using the geographic information system (GIS) software ArcView® by digitizing geological contacts onto the United States Geological Survey (USGS) digital raster graphic (DRG).
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver Watershed Alliance Food Sources, and Holistic Community Quality USDA NRCS to Manage Vegetation (Nrcs.Usda
    Sugar 62 Loaf Panorama 187 Bella L Point 72 Elkhorn Williams Devil’s Eye Brow BB EE AAVista VV EE RR Natural Area LL AA KK EE Pea Ridge National Henry Trimble Round Military Indian Lake Pea Park Creek 187 Leatherwood WATERSHEDS Glasscock Gentry WATERSHEDS BENTON Ridge CARROL Watersheds are separated BEAVER LAKE WATERSHED Garfield Dam Site River Park by topographic divides off Source water from 7 sub-watersheds Rich Dam Site North Park which water flows to one side flows into Beaver Lake/White River. or the other. Beaver Lake- Indian Creek Park USACE/Beaver Dam 187 White River WS 62 Humphery Dam Site Lake Park Lake Sequoyah-WR WS Pond Beaver Dam Middle Fork-WR WS 94 Carroll-Boone Water District War Eagle Lost Bridge Public Rolloff West Fork-WR WS Creek WS Avoca Lost Miles Richland Creek Use Area Creek WS “Two Ton” Benton/Washington Bridge Hollow Sugar Headwaters of Posy Regional Public Ford WR WS Water Authority Village Starkey Public Use Area 62 Coose Little Flock Hollow Like stacking bowls, a watershed W may be part of one that is larger and W Grindstone also have any number of smaller Prairie Creek Ventris “SUB-WATERSHEDS” inside it. Beaver Lake Park Pond The WHITE RIVER flows 722 miles from Project Office North its HEADWATERS near Boston, Arkansas in Larue the Beaver Lake Watershed, Clifty northward into Missouri, then Prairie 23 Creek south to the lowest point in Lake Creek 3D21 Buck its watershed where it joins Atalanta Rocky Branch the Arkansas RIver, ultimately Former 12 Park draining into the MISSISSIPPI Water Supply RIVER.
    [Show full text]
  • Caddo Hill Wins State Track Championship
    2 Sections • 30 Pages Thursday, May 14, 2015 th GLENWOOD uSPS 220-180 90 Year • Issue 20 ¢ HERALDSERVING GLENWOOD, ARKANSAS & THE DIAMOND LAKES SINCE 1926 75 SEE uS ONLINE: WWW.SWARKANSASNEWS.COM AND WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/GLENWOOD HERALD Jester arrested on theft Caddo Hill wins state of property charges track championship GLENWOOD -- Jeffrey Lynn Jester of Glenwood was arrested Monday May 11 as a result of an in- 14’ 2” and William Bruce won the discus throw vestigation stemming from allegations of her former BY DEWAYNE HOLLOWAY with a toss of 133’ 4”. employer. Editor, Montgomery County News Larissa Martin led the charge for the girls Jester, 49, was detained in the Pike County De- with 28 points with Haley Forest close behind tention Facility pending bond on a felony charge of Sophomore pole vaulter Matthew Standridge with 26. theft of property. set a new 1A state record with a vault of 14 feet Martin earned the Lady Indians lone victory On Tuesday Judge Tom Cooper set bond in the 2 inches last week as the Caddo Hills Indians on the track with a win in the 300M hurdles with amount of $25,000. rolled to another outdoor track state title. a time of :51.22 According to police reports, January 21, Todd The Indians’ winning score of 130 points al- Haley Forest dominated the throwing events, George, owner of Glenwood Physical Therapy Cen- most doubled the effort of second place Trinity winning the shot put (35’ 4”) and the discus ter, reported to the Pike County Sheriff’s Depart- Christian who tallied 71 points.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Esources Arkansas
    United States l Department of Agriculture Forest esources Forest Service Southern Forest Arkansas Experiment Station New Orleans, Louisiana Roy C. Beltz, Daniel F. Bertelson, Joanne L. Faulkner, and Dennis M. May Resource Bulletin SO-169 February 1992 SUMMARY The 1988 Forest Survey of Arkansas revealed new trends in forest resources. After decades of decline, forest area increased 3 percent. Pine plantation acreage increased substantially while acreage in natural pine stands decreased. Softwood inventory was down 5 percent, with growth also declining. Loblolly pine volume exceeded that of shortleaf pine for the first time in Arkansas his- tory. The outlook for hardwood resources is positive. Inventory and growth have increased, and loss of bottomland hardwood acreage appeared to be at a standstill. Front cover: Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image of Arkansas produced from data collected by the NOAA-11 satellite of the Nation- al Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on April 11, 1991. In general, forest land is dark red; nonforest land is light red or blue; water is dark blue. CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS ........................................ INTRODUCTION ................................... ...2 HISTORY OF ARKANSAS FORESTS .................... .3 FOREST AREA ...................................... .5 SurveyRegions ...................................... The Delta Region .................................. .5 The Ouachita Region ............................... .7 The Ozark Region .................................. .7 The Southwest
    [Show full text]
  • 2005-2006 Catalog
    SOUTH ARKANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2005-2006 Catalog 1-800-955-2289 www.southark.edu West Campus East Campus Warren Site 300 S. West Ave. 3696 East Main Rd. 800 N. Walnut El Dorado, AR El Dorado, AR Warren, AR 71730 71730 71671 870-862-8131 870-862-8131 870-226-6920 A Message from the President Un Mensaje de la Presidenta de la Universidad Greetings! Saludos! On behalf of the faculty and staff, welcome to South Arkansas Community College. En nombre de la facultad y el personal, Your decision to enroll in one or more bienvenidos a la Universadid de la classes at SouthArk may be one of the most Comunidad del Sur de Arkansas. Tu important decisions you have ever made in decision de inscribirte en una o mas clases your life. en el Sur de Arkansas es una de las We are here to help you achieve your decisiones mas importantes que has hecho academic and career goals. Don’t hesitate en tu vida. to ask questions and explore the campus. A Nosotros estamos aqui para ayudarte a whole new world of opportunities lays alcanzar tus metas academicas. No tenga ahead, providing access to learning pena en preguntar y explorar el campo. experiences never imagined. Un mundo nuevo de oportunidades estan Starting classes at SouthArk will require adelante, permitiendo acceso para una you to make changes and adjustments in experiencia en el estudio que nunca your life. I encourage you to make imaginaste. learning an important priority; your Iniciar las clases en Sur de Arkansas commitment to yourself and your studies requiere que tu hagas cambios y ajustes en will benefit you in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Bradley Calhoun, and Ouachita Counties, Arkansas
    Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Bradley Calhoun, and Ouachita Counties, Arkansas By DONALD R. ALBIN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1779-G Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Geological Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washln!1ton, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- G1 Introduction______________________________________________________ 1 Purpose and scope _____________________ - _______ ------------____ 1 Location and well-numbering system_____________________________ 2 Acknowledgments_________ ____________________________________ 3 General geology of deposits of Cenozoic age___________________________ 3 Tertiary System _______________________________ --- ___ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8 Paleocene Series ____________________________ -- ___ -_________ 8 ~idway Group_____ ___________________________________ 8 Eocene Series_____________________________________________ 9 Wilcox GroUP----------------------------------------- 9 Claiborne Group______________________________________ 9 Carrizo Sand______________________________________ 9 Cane River Formation_____________________________ 10 Sparta Sand_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 10 Cook ~ountain Formation_________________________
    [Show full text]
  • November 2018 Data Report
    August 2012 – November 2018 Data Report Prepared by: Angela Danovi Beaver LakeSmart / StreamSmart Coordinator Ozarks Water Watch 1200 W. Walnut Street, Suite 3405 Rogers, AR 72756 Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................iii Water Quality Parameter Descriptions ............................................................................................................................... iii Alkalinity ......................................................................................................................................................................... iii Conductivity.................................................................................................................................................................... iii pH ................................................................................................................................................................................... iv Total Dissolved Solids ...................................................................................................................................................... v Total Nitrogen ................................................................................................................................................................. v Total Phosphorus ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Access Hospital Map 2020
    Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Grant Program | HRSA-15-038 | Oce of Rural Health Policy SOURCE: https://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/programopportunities/ Arkansas Hospitals, fundingopportunities/?id=b56d4504-7bf6-4f79-b0e8-37b766f2213e Rogers Eureka Springs Mountain Home Pocahontas Paragould Mercy Hospital Northwest Arkansas Eureka Springs Berryville Baxter Regional St. Bernards Five Arkansas Methodist Bentonville Hospital Mercy Hospital–Berryville Medical Center Rivers Medical Care Medical Center Northwest Medical Piggott Center–Bentonville CARROLL BOONE MARION Salem RANDOLPH BENTON Harrison BAXTER Fulton County CLAY Piggott Community Hospital Siloam Springs FULTON Springdale North Arkansas Hospital Siloam Springs IZARD Blytheville • Arkansas Children’s Northwest Regional Medical Center Calico Rock Walnut Ridge Great River Regional Hospital GREENE • Northwest Medical Center–Springdale Izard County SHARP Lawrence Gravette WASHINGTON Medical Center Johnson NEWTON SEARCY Mountain View Fayetteville (3) MADISON Medical Center Memorial Hospital Ozarks Northwest Medical Center– Stone County LAWRENCE Community • Washington Regional Medical Center Batesville CRAIGHEAD MISSISSIPPI Willow Creek Women’s Hospital Medical Center STONE Hospital • Northwest Health Physicians’ White River Jonesboro (2) Heber Springs Osceola of Gravette Specialty Hospital Clarksville VAN Medical Center • St. Bernards Johnson Regional Russellville BUREN Baptist Health– South Mississippi County • Veterans Health Care System INDEPENDENCE Newport POINSETT Medical Center
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Ag in Arkansas Toni Perry, Robin Scott, La News This Week
    UAM rescinds Jerry Webb becomes second AD off er perfect Professor Pigskin 1C 4C ADVANCE-MONTICELLONIAN 75¢ WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 SERVING DREW COUNTY SINCECE 18701870 City Council Williams endures hears plans for airport as DC’s ‘champion’ BY ASHLEY FOREMAN news last week. “Mr. BY ASHLEY FOREMAN [email protected] Williams also had [email protected] strong ties to the Mon- ticello School District. With two council members ab- “When I think about He will be remembered sent, the Monticello City Coun- the word ‘champion,’ as a dedicated educa- cil meeting was called to order I think about Mr. Bil- tor who possessed the by Mayor David Anderson at ly Williams,” Melissa heart of a teacher and 6 p.m. Tuesday night. Bever- Vincent, the Drew Cen- Billy Williams the love for all chil- ly Hudson, Ward 4, and Cedric tral High School princi- dren. Leonard, Ward 1, were absent pal, said Monday. “Because he mentored many from the meeting. Williams passed away sud- new superintendents, his influ- Bennie Ryburn III addressed denly on Sept. 18 while working ence has had a positive impact the council members about up- on his family farm. He was in on other Arkansas districts. He dating the fuel system at the his sixth year as superintendent will be greatly missed by us all.” Monticello airport. He told the at the Drew Central School Dis- But none more in education council that the Airport Com- trict. than his co-workers in ‘Pirate mission had applied for and re- He began his educational ca- Nation,” as he loved to call ceived a grant from State Aero- reer in 1975 as a graduate assis- DCSD.
    [Show full text]
  • Smith-Turner Timberlands
    Smith-Turner Timberlands Sealed Bid Real Estate Offering Bids Due December 15, 2017 112 Tracts totaling an estimated 18,624 GIS-Calculated Acres Being Offered by Individual Tract or in its Entirety South Arkansas – North Louisiana – Northeast Texas Project Overview TerraStone Land Company, in cooperation with owned by Smith-Turner Land Company LLC, Tri- United Country – Neeley Forestry Services, is State Company LLC, Tri-State Land and Minerals pleased to offer for sale, by sealed bid, 113 tracts of LLC, and CTS Land Company LLC. timberland containing an estimated 18,624 GIS-cal- culated acres located in: Historically managed for timber production, the composition of the stands offers both near- and • South Central Arkansas - 16,991 acres long-term income opportunities. Recreational and • North Louisiana - 1,598 acres hunting opportunities abound, too, with a signifi- • Texas - 35 acres cant number of the tracts lying adjacent to or dis- sected by either Dorcheat Bayou or Bodcau Bayou. The individual tracts offered for sale range in size Healthy populations of deer, turkey and duck have from 19 acres to 3100 acres. The offered tracts are been observed on the property. Location and Nearby Forest Product markets As shown on the enclosed Vicinity Map, most of the tracts and acreage are locat- ed in Southwest Arkansas in the vicinity of Magnolia, in Columbia County. The remainder of the tracts are scattered throughout the Arkansas counties of Union, Nevada, Lafayette and Miller; the Louisiana Parishes of Bossier, Webster, Claiborne and Morehouse; and one tract in Cass County, Texas. The properties are well situated to take advantage of not only the existing and recently-opened primary wood-using markets, but also facilities that are slated for construction or expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHWEST ARKANSAS Western ARKANSAS West Central
    Fulton Clay Benton Carroll Baxter Randolph Boone Marion Sharp Izard Greene Madison Lawrence Washington Newton Searcy Stone Craighead Mississippi Independence Crawford Johnson Van Buren Jackson Poinsett Franklin Cleburne Pope Conway Cross Logan White Crittenden Sebastian Faulkner Woodruff Saint Francis Yell Perry Eastern ARKANSAS Scott Pulaski Prairie Lonoke Lee East Arkansas Community College • Mid-South Saline Monroe Community College • Phillips Community College of the Garland Montgomery University of Arkansas Polk Phillips Arkansas Hot Spring Grant Jefferson Western ARKANSAS Pike Howard Rich Mountain Community College • Arkansas Tech - Sevier Clark Ozark • University of Arkansas - Fort Smith Dallas Lincoln Cleveland Desha Little River Hempstead Nevada Ouachita North Central ARKANSAS Calhoun Drew ASU - Beebe • ASU - Newport • Ozarka College • Bradley University of Arkansas Community College at Batesville • Miller Columbia Chicot Lyon College • Harding University Union Ashley Lafayette West Central ARKANSAS National Park College • College of the Ouachitas • University of NORTHEast ARKANSAS Arkansas Community College at Morrilton • Arkansas Tech Arkansas Northeastern College • Black River Technical University • Henderson State University • Ouachita Baptist University College • Arkansas State University • Crowley’s Ridge College • Williams Baptist College SouthWEST ARKANSAS Cossatot Community College of the University of Arkansas • South Arkansas Little rock ( ) & Central ARKANSAS Community College • University of Arkansas Community College
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Analysis of Madison County in Northwest Arkansas
    November 1, 2003 PART TWO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR SUBMITTAL TO AND APPROVAL OF THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION Post Office Box 8913 Little Rock AR 72219-8913 Phone (501) 682-0602 Fax (501) 682-0611 www.adeq.state.ar.us Minimum Requirements for Regional Solid Waste Management Plans 1 November 1, 2003 Due Date November 1, 2004, Followed By Annual Updates Minimum Requirements for Regional Solid Waste Management Plans 2 November 1, 2003 PART TWO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Regional Solid Waste Management Plans Preface Part Two – Minimum Requirements for Regional Solid Waste Management Plans, is presented pursuant to the requirements set forth by the 83rd Arkansas General Assembly in Act 1376 of 2001, codified in Statute as Arkansas Code Annotated (A.C.A.) §8-6-1901 et al. Act 1376 of 2001 specifically charges the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality with establishing minimum requirements for the development of new waste management plans by Regional Solid Waste Management Boards. The new plans will replace those previously required by Act 870 of 1989, codified as A.C.A. §8-6-701 et al. Act 1376 of 2001 directs that the requirements include, at a minimum, requirements for: 1. STRATEGIC PLANNING 2. REPORTING 3. PUBLIC NOTICE AND PARTICIPATION 4. SERVICES 5. SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS AND ISSUES The Department addresses this directive by requiring that each Regional Solid Waste Management Board respond to the established requirements set forth in this document, known as Part Two – Minimum Requirements for Regional Solid Waste Management Plans, which is a supplement to Part One – The Statewide Solid Waste Management Plan for Arkansas.
    [Show full text]