Forest Esources Arkansas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Forest Esources Arkansas United States l Department of Agriculture Forest esources Forest Service Southern Forest Arkansas Experiment Station New Orleans, Louisiana Roy C. Beltz, Daniel F. Bertelson, Joanne L. Faulkner, and Dennis M. May Resource Bulletin SO-169 February 1992 SUMMARY The 1988 Forest Survey of Arkansas revealed new trends in forest resources. After decades of decline, forest area increased 3 percent. Pine plantation acreage increased substantially while acreage in natural pine stands decreased. Softwood inventory was down 5 percent, with growth also declining. Loblolly pine volume exceeded that of shortleaf pine for the first time in Arkansas his- tory. The outlook for hardwood resources is positive. Inventory and growth have increased, and loss of bottomland hardwood acreage appeared to be at a standstill. Front cover: Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image of Arkansas produced from data collected by the NOAA-11 satellite of the Nation- al Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on April 11, 1991. In general, forest land is dark red; nonforest land is light red or blue; water is dark blue. CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS ........................................ INTRODUCTION ................................... ...2 HISTORY OF ARKANSAS FORESTS .................... .3 FOREST AREA ...................................... .5 SurveyRegions ...................................... The Delta Region .................................. .5 The Ouachita Region ............................... .7 The Ozark Region .................................. .7 The Southwest Region .............................. .7 TimberlandTrends ................................... Little Change in Timberland Ownership ................. .9 Plantations Replace Natural Stands .................... .9 Loss of Bottomland Hardwood Stands Slows ............. .9 THE SOFTWOOD RESOURCE ......................... .9 Pine Plantations Reach Merchantable Size ............... .9 Inventory of Pine Declines ............................ 10 Loblolly Pine Surpasses Shortleaf ..................... .11 THE HARDWOOD RESOURCE ........................ .13 Hardwood Inventory Gains Substantially ............... .13 Hardwood Resource Matures ......................... .14 GROWTH, REMOVALS, AND MORTALITY ............. .15 Timber Growth Drops Off ............................ .15 Timber Removals Continue to Rise .................... .16 Pine Removals Exceed Growth ........................ .16 Annual Harvest Averages 575,000 Acres ................ .17 TIMBER PRODUCTS OUTPUT ........................ .17 The Lumber Industry ............................... .17 The Pulp Industry .................................. .19 The Veneer Industry ................................ .20 Miscellaneous Products .............................. .20 1989TimberProduction ............................ ..2 1 TIMBER OUTLOOK ................................. .21 Projections ....................................... ..2 2 Management Opportunities .......................... .23 LITERATURE CITED ................................ .24 APPENDIX..........................................2 7 SurveyMethods.....................................2 8 Reliability of the Data ............................... .28 Definitions of Terms ................................ .29 SpeciesList ...................................... ..3 3 StandardTables .................................. ..3 5 Forest Resources of Arkansas Roy C. Beltz, Daniel F. Bertelson, Joanne L. Faulkner, and Dennis M. May HIGHLIGHTS 1978, fewer than 340,000 acres of planted pine were in the merchantable size classes. Beyond the year 2000, recently planted seedling-sapling Two considerations are important in interpreting stands should start reaching merchantable size this 1988 survey of Arkansas forest resources and at about 145,000 acres per year. resource changes; these are new in comparison to the Plantations now account for more than half of all 1978 survey. They are: (1) a change in log/tree grading pine sapling-seedling stands. Acreage of natural and (2) a reclassification of some forest land from un- pine sapling-seedling stands declined by one- productive to productive. The change in grading is third. Almost 60 percent of the remaining detailed in the appendix; the effect is to reclassify cer- natural pine stands are sawtimber size. tain trees from culls to growing stock. This change af- The hardwood resource continues to age. Saw- fects estimates of inventory, growth, removals, and timber stands accounted for more than 42 per- mortality, especially for hardwoods. The reclassifica- cent of all hardwood stands, compared to 40 per- tion of forest land based on productivity occurred cent in 1978. The number of hardwood trees 15.0 primarily in the Ozark region and affects area as well inches in diameter at breast height (d.b.h.) and as inventory estimates. larger increased 10 percent, while the number of This analysis of the 1988 Arkansas survey results hardwood saplings decreased in each major has taken these factors into consideration. Com- ownership class. parisons of 1978 and 1988 results reveal the following: For the first time since 1951, inventory of pine l After declining for about 20 years, area of timber- timber declined. Inventory of pine growing stock land was up by more than 500,000 acres, or 3 per- was down 5 percent. Most of the reduction was on cent. Although the reclassification of woodland to forest industry land, where the inventory of pine timberland in the Ozark region accounted for sawtimber dropped 23 percent. Most of the part of this gain, the real increase totaled more remaining loss was on nonindustrial private than 200,000 acres. forest (NIPF) land where pine poletimber inven- l Acreage of timberland occupied by planted pine tory decreased 6 percent. stands totaled 1.6 million acres and is rapidly in- For the first time, loblolly pine surpassed creasing. Most of these pine plantations are shortleaf pine in the timber inventory. Inventory replacing natural pine stands. Over the past 25 of loblolly pine totaled almost 4.0 billion cubic years, area in natural pine decreased by about feet-53 percent of all pine. About 94 percent of 1.7 million acres. the loblolly pine volume is in the Southwest l The loss of bottomland hardwood stands has region. Inventory of shortleaf pine decreased 14 slowed. In the mid-1930’s, bottomland hardwood percent, from 4.2 to 3.6 billion cubic feet. stands occupied almost 6 million acres. Today After several decades of decline, inventory of -they occupy fewer than 3 million acres. Between hardwood growing stock increased another 16 1978 and 1988, the net loss was fewer than percent. The largest percentage gain-30 per- 100,000 acres. Area occupied by upland cent-occurred on public timberland. In actual hardwood stands was up 10 percent, and now to- volume, the largest increase occurred on NIPF tals 7.3 million acres. land, where the inventory was up 20 percent. In l Pine plantations are reaching merchantable size. contrast to these increases, inventory of More than 600,000 acres of planted pine have hardwood on forest industry land was down al- now reached poletimber or sawtimber size. In most 4 percent. Roy C. Beltz is project leader and Daniel F. Bertelson, Joanne L. Faulkner, and Dennis M. May are foresters, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, Starkville, MS 39759. 1 l Average annual net growth declined from 50 to and 1978 significantly modified the original authori- 45 cubic feet per acre. The average annual net zation. The primary mission of these periodic surveys growth of pine was down 16 percent, while is to develop and maintain resource information hardwood growth increased by 5 percent. Most of needed to formulate sound forest policies, programs, the reduction in pine growth occurred on NIPF and practices. Principal users of surveys are public land, where pine growth was down 22 percent. agencies and private forestry interests. In the States On a percentage basis, an even sharper drop oc- of Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Okla- curred on public land. Most of the increase in homa, Tennessee, and Texas and the Commonwealth hardwood growth was on NIPF land. of Puerto Rico, the Forest Inventory and Analysis l Timber removals continue to increase. Annual (FIA) Research Work unit of the Southern Forest Ex- removals of all species combined averaged 686 periment Station conducts the surveys. One of six FIA million cubic feet. Pine removals were up by one- units in the United States, the Southern FIA Unit is third; hardwood removals were down 8 percent. headquartered in Starkville, Mississippi. Most of the recent increase in timber removals Field work on the sixth survey of Arkansas began in occurred on forest industry land, which supplied April 1987 and was completed in June 1988. Five pre- almost one-half of the total harvest. vious surveys, completed in 1936, 1951, 1959, 1969, l Pine removals exceeded growth by 12 percent. and 1978, provide statistics for measuring changes Most of the overcut occurred on private timber- and trends over a 52-year period. In some cases, pre- land in a 16-county area in the west central part viously reported statistics have been adjusted to pro- of the State. In this area, pine removals exceeded vide better estimates of real change. In other cases, growth by 65 percent, decreasing the pine inven- changes in classifications and survey procedures tory by 20 percent over the lo-year period. could prevent or cloud comparisons. l Between 1978 and 1988,
Recommended publications
  • Arkansas Water Pollution Control Commission 6Rder No
    ARKANSAS WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION 6RDER NO. 1-58 IN THE MATTER OF THE POLLUTION OF THE LOWER OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES BY SALT WATER ~~D OTHER OIL FIELD WASTES. Filed in this office on the 20th day of February. 1964. ?CLLUI'IC1 CCNT?.C L CCl·&~ISSICN IN TEE MATT3R CF THZ 7-'GLLl.i'TICi'! ) ) r'F THS LCHER \Uf.CH !TA RIVE::'. .t;.ND ) ) No. 1-58 TP.I""'UTAP.I'ZS .. y SAL'T HAT3R Al'-"!D ) ) CTHZR CIL :r"IELD ~~!ASTE3 ) CRDSR. FEEREA3, pursuant to the provisions of Act 472 of the Acts of Ar!<ansas for 1949, the ~.rkansas ~vater :?ollution Control Commis- sion, hereinafter referred to as the "CommissionH, is authorized to adopt rules and regulations to prevent pollutL.:-::."1 .s.nd to ma!~e and alter reasonable o~ders requiring the discontinuance of discharge of sewage, industrial wastes, or other wastes into any of the waters of the State; and ~~~RZA3, investigations conducted by the Commission have established that enormous quantities of salt water and other oil field wastes are being cischerged each dc:.y from oil and gas wells into the waters of the !~uachita P..iver (below 7~iver hile 312) and the tributaries thereof, including Lapile Cree~-{, Nill Creek and Smackover Creek, hereinafter collectively referred to as the •:tower Cuachita River Drainage ':asinn; and HF..S~EA3, oil and gas wells in the Lower Cuachita River Drainage :>.asin discharge more than 19,200,000 2;allons of salt water per day, equivalent to over 12,500,000 pounds of dry salt, the sub- stant:ial part of which flows into the Cuachita River; and \:? 1:::::'2t<>, the dischar~e of said salt water and other oil field wastes has produced excessive and abnormal salinity and ab- normally lm.v p~: value in t:he "Jat:s::s of the Lower ~uachita :S.iver Drainage ~asin, thereby substantially impairin3 the quality of said~ .
    [Show full text]
  • A Clean Energy Economy for Arkansas
    NRDC Issue Paper November 2009 A Clean Energy Economy for Arkansas Analysis of the Rural Economic Development Potential of Renewable Resources Author Martin R. Cohen NRDC Project Contact Pierre Bull About NRDC The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 1.3 million members and online activists. Since 1970, our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to protect the world’s natural resources, public health, and the environment. NRDC has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Montana, and Beijing. Visit us at www.nrdc.org. Acknowledgments To come. For questions and further information on this report, please contact Pierre Bull, NRDC at [email protected] or (212) 727-4606. NRDC Director of Communications: Phil Gutis NRDC Marketing and Operations Director: Alexandra Kennaugh NRDC Publications Director: Lisa Goffredi NRDC Publications Editor: Anthony Clark Production: Jon Prinsky Copyright 2009 by the Natural Resources Defense Council. For additional copies of this report, send $5.00 plus $3.95 shipping and handling to NRDC Reports Department, 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011. California residents must add 7.5% sales tax. Please make checks payable to NRDC in U.S. dollars. This report is printed on paper that is 100 percent postconsumer recycled fiber, processed chlorine free. Natural Resources Defense Council I ii A Clean Energy Economy for Arkansas: Analysis of the Rural Economic Development Potential
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 IRP Filing 103112.Pdf
    Entergy Arkansas, Inc. APSC FILED Time: 10/31/2012 2:33:12 PM: Recvd 10/31/2012 2:30:51 PM: Docket 07-016-U-Doc. 24 425 West Capitol Avenue P. O. Box 551 Little Rock, AR 72203-0551 Tel 501 377 4457 Fax 501 377 4415 Steven K. Strickland Vice President Regulatory Affairs October 31, 2012 Ms. Kristi Rhude Arkansas Public Service Commission P. O. Box 400 1000 Center Street Little Rock, AR 72203 Re: APSC Docket No. 07-016-U Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 2012 Integrated Resource Plan Dear Ms. Rhude: Consistent with Section 6 of Attachment 1 to the Arkansas Public Service Commission (“Commission”) Order No. 6 – Docket No. 06-028-R Resource Planning Guidelines for Electric Utilities, Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (“EAI”) submits the following: a) its 2012 Integrated Resource Plan (the “IRP”); b) the Stakeholder Report that was prepared in accordance with Section 4.8 of the Commission’s Resource Planning Guidelines; c) the presentations made by EAI in connection with its July 31, 2012 Stakeholder Meeting; and d) EAI’s responses to Stakeholder’s questions at the Stakeholder Meeting. Should you have any questions concerning this filing, please call me at (501) 377-4457 or Laura Landreaux at (501) 377-5876. Sincerely, /s/ Steven K. Strickland SS Attachments c: All Parties of Record APSC FILED Time: 10/31/2012 2:33:12 PM: Recvd 10/31/2012 2:30:51 PM: Docket 07-016-U-Doc. 24 Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 2012 Integrated Resource Plan October 31, 2012 APSC FILED Time: 10/31/2012 2:33:12 PM: Recvd 10/31/2012 2:30:51 PM: Docket 07-016-U-Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Water Under Scarcity Conditions Tyler Robert Knapp University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Water under Scarcity Conditions Tyler Robert Knapp University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Agricultural Economics Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Knapp, Tyler Robert, "Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Water under Scarcity Conditions" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1809. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1809 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Water under Scarcity Conditions A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Agriculture Economics by Tyler R. Knapp University of Georgia Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, 2008 Oregon State University Bachelor of Science in Environmental Economics and Policy, 2014 December 2016 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. Dr. Qiuqiong Huang Dr. Kent Kovacs Thesis Director Co-director Dr. Stijn Speelman Dr. Jennie S. Popp Committee Member Committee Member Dr. Bruce L. Dixon Dr. Rodolfo N. Nayga, Jr. Committee Member Committee Member Abstract Reliance of Arkansas agricultural producers on groundwater for irrigation has led to depletion of the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer. Without intervention, consequences include insufficient groundwater to meet irrigation demand as well as drawdown of the deeper Sparta Aquifer, upon which communities in eastern Arkansas rely for non-agricultural use.
    [Show full text]
  • Value Added Economic Impact of Agriculture in Arkansas
    Value Added Economic Impact of Agriculture in Arkansas Inside Value Added ..................................... 3 Arkansas Counts on Agriculture .................................... 5 2 Home Grown & Home Cooking .................................. 6 Agriculture in the Knowledge-Based Economy ........... 9 Arkansas is Our Campus ................. 10 University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture ..................... 11 Produced by the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture 2404 N. University Ave. Little Rock, Arkansas 72207 www.uaex.edu/division.htm Value In / Value Out Value Added Agriculture accounts for nearly $1 out of every $5 of added value in the state’s economy. “Value Added” is the total contribution to the economy of employee, owner and property income, 3 plus indirect business taxes. Total Impact of Value added as a result of agricultural and forestry Arkansas Agriculture production and processing in Arkansas was $13.1 billion in 2001, the latest year for which relevant ■ Employment — 291,290 jobs statistics are available. That was 19.6 percent of the (1 out of 5 Arkansas jobs) total value added in the state’s economy. ■ Wages — $7.8 Billion The agriculture and forestry sector provided 291,290 (12.7 percent of Arkansas wages) jobs and $7.8 billion in labor income. ■ Value Added — $13.1 Billion ($1 of every $5 of added value in Arkansas) A detailed analysis is provided in “Impact of the Agricultural Sector on the Arkansas Economy in 2001,” by J. Popp, G. Vickery, H.L Goodwin, and W. Miller. Research Report 975. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville. 4 Arkansas Counts on Agriculture rkansas led the Southeast region in the percentage of the economy contributed by agriculture in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Development Lesson Plan
    Arkansas State Archives Arkansas Digital Archives Lesson plans Educators Railroad development lesson plan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalheritage.arkansas.gov/lesson-plans Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Railroad development lesson plan, Arkansas history lesson plans, Arkansas State Archives, Little Rock, Arkansas. Use and reproduction of images held by the Arkansas State Archives without prior written permission is prohibited. For information on reproducing images held by the Arkansas State Archives, please call 501-682-6900 or email at [email protected]. Arkansas railroad development lesson plan, Arkansas State Archives, Little Rock, Arkansas. ‘The Advance Guard of Civilization’ The Impact of Railroad Development on the History and Economy of Arkansas and the Nation Social Studies – 6 – 8 (U.S. History, Arkansas History, World History, Civics, etc.); English Language Arts; Geography This unit explores the development of railroads and their impact on the economic development of Arkansas through the use of primary and secondary sources. Students will read newspaper articles and pamphlet excerpts to understand how the railroads affected industry and settlement across the state. A list of various activities related to original primary and secondary resources allows teacher the flexibility to choose parts of this lesson plan to use and adapt to various types of students. Essential Question: How did the development of railroads in Arkansas
    [Show full text]
  • Caddo Hill Wins State Track Championship
    2 Sections • 30 Pages Thursday, May 14, 2015 th GLENWOOD uSPS 220-180 90 Year • Issue 20 ¢ HERALDSERVING GLENWOOD, ARKANSAS & THE DIAMOND LAKES SINCE 1926 75 SEE uS ONLINE: WWW.SWARKANSASNEWS.COM AND WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/GLENWOOD HERALD Jester arrested on theft Caddo Hill wins state of property charges track championship GLENWOOD -- Jeffrey Lynn Jester of Glenwood was arrested Monday May 11 as a result of an in- 14’ 2” and William Bruce won the discus throw vestigation stemming from allegations of her former BY DEWAYNE HOLLOWAY with a toss of 133’ 4”. employer. Editor, Montgomery County News Larissa Martin led the charge for the girls Jester, 49, was detained in the Pike County De- with 28 points with Haley Forest close behind tention Facility pending bond on a felony charge of Sophomore pole vaulter Matthew Standridge with 26. theft of property. set a new 1A state record with a vault of 14 feet Martin earned the Lady Indians lone victory On Tuesday Judge Tom Cooper set bond in the 2 inches last week as the Caddo Hills Indians on the track with a win in the 300M hurdles with amount of $25,000. rolled to another outdoor track state title. a time of :51.22 According to police reports, January 21, Todd The Indians’ winning score of 130 points al- Haley Forest dominated the throwing events, George, owner of Glenwood Physical Therapy Cen- most doubled the effort of second place Trinity winning the shot put (35’ 4”) and the discus ter, reported to the Pike County Sheriff’s Depart- Christian who tallied 71 points.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005-2006 Catalog
    SOUTH ARKANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2005-2006 Catalog 1-800-955-2289 www.southark.edu West Campus East Campus Warren Site 300 S. West Ave. 3696 East Main Rd. 800 N. Walnut El Dorado, AR El Dorado, AR Warren, AR 71730 71730 71671 870-862-8131 870-862-8131 870-226-6920 A Message from the President Un Mensaje de la Presidenta de la Universidad Greetings! Saludos! On behalf of the faculty and staff, welcome to South Arkansas Community College. En nombre de la facultad y el personal, Your decision to enroll in one or more bienvenidos a la Universadid de la classes at SouthArk may be one of the most Comunidad del Sur de Arkansas. Tu important decisions you have ever made in decision de inscribirte en una o mas clases your life. en el Sur de Arkansas es una de las We are here to help you achieve your decisiones mas importantes que has hecho academic and career goals. Don’t hesitate en tu vida. to ask questions and explore the campus. A Nosotros estamos aqui para ayudarte a whole new world of opportunities lays alcanzar tus metas academicas. No tenga ahead, providing access to learning pena en preguntar y explorar el campo. experiences never imagined. Un mundo nuevo de oportunidades estan Starting classes at SouthArk will require adelante, permitiendo acceso para una you to make changes and adjustments in experiencia en el estudio que nunca your life. I encourage you to make imaginaste. learning an important priority; your Iniciar las clases en Sur de Arkansas commitment to yourself and your studies requiere que tu hagas cambios y ajustes en will benefit you in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Creativity in the Natural State
    Creativity in the Natural State Growing Arkansas’ Creative Economy Since 1991, RTS has been developing, analyzing, and implementing strategies to create high wage jobs and wealth to communities. RTS, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit located in Carrboro, North Carolina, builds regional competitive advantage through economic and work-force development policy and practice. RTS pays special attention to disadvantaged places and populations. RTS • 205 Lloyd Street, Suite 210 • Carrboro, NC 27510 USA • +1 919 933 6699 • www.rtsinc.org Regional Technology Strategies, Inc. Creativity in the Natural State Growing Arkansas’ Creative Economy With Mt. Auburn Associates Arkansas Arts Council Arkansas Science & Technology Authority Arkansas Association of Two-Year Colleges Volume 1 • April 2007 Supported by a grant from the Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation Cover Captions: Top Row Poster from Fayetteville Arts Festival, 2006 Bubba’s Blues Corner in Helena "The Sounds of OEM" at Family Faith Festival in Little Rock Bottom Row Larry Pennington working at wheel Opening scene in “Gone with the Wind” Unidentified artisan making dulcimer Copyright ©2007 by Regional Technologies Strategies, Inc. 205 Lloyd Street, Suite 210 Carrboro, NC 27510 We would be delighted if you quote this book in your publications or make copies of portions of this book to give others. However, we do ask that you send us a copy of any publication in which this book is quoted. ISBN 1-931613-03-L Table of Contents Acknowledgements 5 Creative Roots to a Competitive Economy 7 Why Focus on the Creative
    [Show full text]
  • ITRAVEL~R Fn History Against Rhetoric Vol
    Fulbright Says Reds Applaud Extremist 'Witch Hunts' In U. S. LITTLE ROCK UPI - Sen. J . William subcommittee now studying it "will clarify Fulbright, D-Ark., said today Communists the matter and will confirm the validity of would be "the first to applaud" extremists the traditional policy of our country." who advocate "rash adventures abroad and The junior senator said he had found the witch hunts at home." economy of Arkansas booming in a recent Fulbright, told the annual meeting of the trip through the state, with the exception of state Chamber of Commerce and Associated the poultry industry. He said exports to for­ Industries of Arkansas, Inc., a truly tough eign countries, school lunch programs and the approach to the Communist problem must food for peace program would improve the be one that meets it with "every instrumen­ poultry situation. tality of foreign and domestic policy." The president of the Western Electric Co., H. I. Romnes, told the Chamber-AIC audi­ Gov. Orval E. Faubus, who has been men­ ence that a fast-changing world poses a seri­ tioned as a possible opponent for Fulbright ous challenge to free enterprise. next summer, was in the audience. "We may count it for a fact," he said, Fulbright said the chief danger to the "that to the degree that the sum of busi­ United States is not internal subversion, but ness decisions bearing on the growth of our "Chinese-Communist Imperialism." He said economy falls short of the nation's hopes, to he had found "considerable misunderstand­ that degree the initiative for economic ing" about the meaning of a controversial growth will pass to other hands-and free memorandum on participation by military enterprise dies a little." leaders in meetings to educate the public To meet this challenge, he said, business about Communism.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Public Higher Education Operating & Capital
    Arkansas Public Higher Education Operating & Capital Recommendations 2021-2023 Biennium 7-A Volume 1 Universities Arkansas Division of Higher Education 423 Main Street, Suite 400, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 October 2020 ARKANSAS PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION OPERATING AND CAPITAL RECOMMENDATIONS 2021-2023 BIENNIUM VOLUME 1 OVERVIEW AND UNIVERSITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS INSTITUTIONAL ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL AND GENERAL OPERATIONS ..................................................................................... 3 Background ...........................................................................................................................................................................................3 Table A. Summary of Operating Needs & Recommendations for 2021-2022 ...................................................................................... 7 Table B. Year 2 - Productivity Index ....................................................................................................................................................8 Table C. 2021-22 Four-Year Universities Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 9 Table D. 2021-22 Two-Year Colleges Recommendations ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Bradley Calhoun, and Ouachita Counties, Arkansas
    Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Bradley Calhoun, and Ouachita Counties, Arkansas By DONALD R. ALBIN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1779-G Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Geological Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washln!1ton, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- G1 Introduction______________________________________________________ 1 Purpose and scope _____________________ - _______ ------------____ 1 Location and well-numbering system_____________________________ 2 Acknowledgments_________ ____________________________________ 3 General geology of deposits of Cenozoic age___________________________ 3 Tertiary System _______________________________ --- ___ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8 Paleocene Series ____________________________ -- ___ -_________ 8 ~idway Group_____ ___________________________________ 8 Eocene Series_____________________________________________ 9 Wilcox GroUP----------------------------------------- 9 Claiborne Group______________________________________ 9 Carrizo Sand______________________________________ 9 Cane River Formation_____________________________ 10 Sparta Sand_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 10 Cook ~ountain Formation_________________________
    [Show full text]