DOCSLIB.ORG

Utah Plant Types—Historical Perspective 1840 to 1981—Annotated List, and Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Utah Plant Types—Historical Perspective 1840 to 1981—Annotated List, and Bibliography Great Basin Naturalist Volume 42 Number 2 Article 1 6-30-1982 Utah plant types—historical perspective 1840 to 1981—annotated list, and bibliography Stanley L. Welsh Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Welsh, Stanley L. (1982) "Utah plant types—historical perspective 1840 to 1981—annotated list, and bibliography," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 42 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol42/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. MU! H'^T The Great Basiii Naturalist Published at Provo, Utah, by Brigham Young University ISSN 0017-3614 Volume 42 June 30, 1982 No. 2 UTAH PLANT TYPES-HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 1840 TO 1981- ANNOTATED LIST, AND BIBLIOGRAPHY St;uiley L. Welsh' .\bstract.— Reviewed are the 144 collectors and 167 authors of 1073 Utali vascular plant types for the period from 1840 to 1981. Historical perspective yields evidence of geography of collection activities by botanists who pene- trated the boundaries of the state, and of shifting centers of emphasis in the study of Utah plants from a classical tax- onomic standpoint. Philosophy and influence of contemporary authors and collectors is discussed as they affect tax- onomv of Utah plants in our first 142 years. A short biographical account of Marcus Eugene Jones and his interaction with other American botanists is included. The annotated checklist includes bibliographical citations, type locality data, collector, and place of deposition. Acknowledgments Kaye Thorne, my colleague at the herba- It is impossible to complete a work as rium of Brigham Young University, gave en- complex and tedious as this without the help couragement and help at all times. Mark L. of otiiers. I thank the curators of the herbaria Gabel aided me with research on the life of hospitality will- visited by me for their and Charles Christopher Parry. To him I am ingness to help in this work. They are as fol- grateful. lows: Elizabeth McClintock and John To Mr. Charles Walker, archivist for the Thomas Howell (CAS); Robert Thorne (RSA); family of Publius Virgilius and Lavinia (Bur- Ronald Hartman (RM); Patricia K. Holmgren ton) I am grateful for the access he and Rupert C. Bameby (NY); George Russell Jones, to a published family history in- (US); Lois Amow and Beverly Albee (UT); provided me cluding accounts of Marcus E. Jones and his Mary Barkworth (UTC); Theodore J. Cro- vello (NDG); and Richard Pohl and Duane wife, Anna Elizabeth Richardson. Also, he Isely (ISC). I am indebted to George Knaphus provided me original letters written by both and Lois Tiffany who made it possible for me of them, and by a nephew of Jones, Arthur J. to visit the site of Jones Grove, where Marcus Jones, who accompanied him on attenuated E. Jones lived with his family near Grinnell, field trips by wagon. These have given me in- Iowa. Acknowledged also is the help of Mrs. sight into Jones's family life and have allowed Ralph Fleener, who resides currently on the me to present a portion of the life-style of his former Jones's property, for the checking of wife and family during his intensely goal- records and dates on markers in the cemetery oriented life. I shall be forever indebted to at Grinnell. Mr. Walker and his family for this insight. 'Life Science Museum and Department of Botany and Range Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602. 129 130 Great Basin Naturalist Vol. 42, No. 2 Introduction I have tried to avoid inclusion of obvious paratypes. These are specimens cited with All taxonomists, and others who work with the original description, but they are not du- plant names, have been hampered by lack of plicates of the holotype. Mostly paratypes a summary treatment of Utah plant types, do, indeed, represent the same taxon as the their collectors, authors, and places of deposi- holotype or lectotype. They are the next tion. The specimens serve to typify the most important elements in typification; but names applied to them by the authors who sometimes they represent extraneous mate- named and described them. The types are the rials, and might belong to quite different name-bearing specimens and are in- taxa. The main reason for not citing them dispensible in interpretation of taxonomic here involves the endless listing of specimens. hmits and concepts; they are necessary for They are very numerous, and will be most nomenclatural considerations. important to those undertaking revisions and There are several kinds of types, but only monographs. holotypes and their duplicates, the isotypes, Information has been gathered from exam- have been included uniformly in the follow- ination of type collections at the U.S. Nation- ing treatment. I have not tried to distinguish al (US, 500 Rocky Mountain holotypes from isotypes in the designations of Museum + ); Herbarium (RM, 150 + ); California Academy place of deposition; that is a taxonomic con- of Science (CAS, 120+ York Botanical sideration which is left to the monographer. ); New In many instances the name bearing speci- Garden (NY, 550 + ); Rancho Santa Ana mens were not designated as types by the au- (POM, 240 + ); Iowa State University (ISC, ca thors and I have followed tradition in citing 100); University of Utah (UT, 100+ ); Utah the original materials as types. Many of the State University (UTC, 150 + ) and Brigham older names have been subjected to lecto- Young University (BRY, 250 + ). Only se- typification. Where this has been obvious, lected material has been examined from Gray mainly in taxonomic revisions or as indicated Herbarium (GH), Carnegie Museum (CM), on some herbarium annotations, I have fol- University of California, Berkeley (UC), lowed that usage. Lectotypification, how- Notre Dame University (NDG), and Missouri ever, is subject to interpretation, and the Botanical Garden (MO). Information on types specimens cited might ultimately be excluded at the Greene Herbarium at Notre Dame from consideration as lectotype or isolecto- University was taken from a computer print- type. Too, some materials have been cited as out provided through the generosity of Pro- cotypes or syntypes. fessor Crovello. Literature has When a portion of the Theodore J. original collection cited is from Utah, I have been reviewed for most of the citations, but included that material as a type. It might some have been unavailable. Other citations have been designated at a lower level, i.e., as still await procedures entailed through inter- paratype, by some author or authors un- library loans. known to me. Type locality information has been abbre- Designation of types is a function of rules viated in some instances to conform to the established mainly in the 20th-century, and computer format. Localities of deposition, or early authors were not impressed with the supposed deposition, are indicated by the necessity of typification. Mention of speci- standard abbreviations. Where I have seen mens to vouch for newly described taxa was the type, the abbreviation is followed by an often only incidental. Most of the types serv- exclamation mark (e.g., US!). Where the ab- ing as bases for taxa described in the 19th- breviation stands alone, the place of deposi- century are now interpreted through lecto- tion is taken from literature, or from infer- typification. Purists often are involved in ence with other collections or names polemical stRiggles over selection of the cor- published by the same author, but the speci- rect portion of the specimens cited (or not men has not been seen by me. cited) as the lectotype. I have not searched Although portions of more than two dec- all the literature in which lectotypes have ades have passed since this work was begun, been designated; that is the role of the the data are still incomplete for many of the monographer. plant names. I apologize for that lack of June 1982 Welsh: Utah Plant Types 131 completeness, and for the many errors that and others have undergone name changes. will become apparent as one uses the list. Present knowledge of distribution allows for Some of the problems are apparently in- accurate placement, at least to county level, soluble. Plant collectors and authors seldom of some materials which were provided with have been instilled with sufficient foresight vague or misleading locality information. to supply all the information necessary for Problems associated with collections of adequate intrepretation of specimens, local- certain individuals will be discussed in the ities, dates, and other data. Brevity was con- historical review presented below. sidered to be a virtue by the collectors (along It is believed that the shortfalls in data do widi an almost impossible, if unstated, belief not obscure the basic picture of plant explor- that others would know what they knew), ation in Utah or of the story of publication of types. This attempt at even when that brevity left out such informa- taxa based on Utah analysis of type data in no way detracts from tion as state, locality within the state (or ter- the larger scene of plant studies which re- ritory), political subdivision of the state, and sulted from the naming of plants based on any other data. Herbarium labels are the types from other areas. The flora of Utah is sources of infonnation provided by plant col- replete with names of plants with circum- lectors, and they should have contained cer- boreal and other extra Utah representation tain basic data. Some of the deficiency, such dating to 18th- and early 19th-century collec- as lack of place names and surveys, is not the tors and authors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Southwestern Rare and Endangered Plants
    Preliminary Report on the Reproductive Biology of the Threatened Chisos Mountain Hedgehog Cactus BONNIE B. AMOS and CHRISTOS VASSILIOU Angelo State University, Texas Abstract: The Chisos Mountain hedgehog cactus (Echinocereus chisoensis, Cactaceae) is a narrow endemic restricted to an approximately 100 square mile area in Big Bend National Park, Texas. It was listed as threatened in 1987 as Echinocereus chisoensis var. chisoensis. An investigation of the reproductive biology and pollination ecology conducted in 1999 and 2000 revealed the taxon to be homogamous, self-incompatible, xenogamous, and heavily dependent upon the cactus oligolectic bee, Diadasia rinconis (Anthophoridae) for pollination. Despite infrequent bee visitation, fruit set from open pollination is high and fruits produce large numbers of seeds. Predation in 2002, probably from rodents as a result of severe drought conditions, was severe on plants, flower buds, and fruits. The Chisos Mountain hedgehog cactus, or Chisos jillo (Opuntia leptocaulis DC.), ocotillo (Fouquieria pitaya (Echinocereus chisoensis W. Marshall), is 1 of splendens K. Kunth), leatherstem (Jatropha dioica V. 20 threatened or endangered cacti listed by the de Cervantes), lechuguilla (Agave lechuguilla J. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Region 2 (http: Torrey), and ceniza (Leucophyl1umf)zltescens (J. Ber- // ecos. fws.gov/ webpage/ webpage-lead.htrnl? landier) I. M. Johnston). An earlier study (Hender- lead_region=2&type=L&listings=l).In 1987 it was shott et al. 1992) did not show specific E. chisoen- added to the federal lists (53 FR 38453) of en- sis-nurse plant associations, but rather showed dangered and threatened wildlife and plants as associations as a consequence of soil conditions threatened because of its restricted distribution, that provide a hospitablL environment for a diver- low numbers, loss of viability in existing popula- sity of species or the exploitation by E.
    [Show full text]
  • P L a N T L I S T Water-Wise Trees and Shrubs for the High Plains
    P L A N T L I S T Water-Wise Trees and Shrubs for the High Plains By Steve Scott, Cheyenne Botanic Gardens Horticulturist 03302004 © Cheyenne Botanic Gardens 2003 710 S. Lions Park Dr., Cheyenne WY, 82001 www.botanic.org The following is a list of suitable water-wise trees and shrubs that are suitable for water- wise landscaping also known as xeriscapes. Many of these plants may suffer if they are placed in areas receiving more than ¾ of an inch of water per week in summer. Even drought tolerant trees and shrubs are doomed to failure if grasses or weeds are growing directly under and around the plant, especially during the first few years. It is best to practice tillage, hoeing, hand pulling or an approved herbicide to kill all competing vegetation for the first five to eight years of establishment. Avoid sweetening the planting hole with manure or compost. If the soil is needs improvement, improve the whole area, not just the planting hole. Trees and shrubs generally do best well with no amendments. Many of the plants listed here are not available in department type stores. Your best bets for finding these plants will be in local nurseries- shop your hometown first! Take this list with you. Encourage nurseries and landscapers to carry these plants! For more information on any of these plants please contact the Cheyenne Botanic Gardens (307-637-6458), the Cheyenne Forestry Department (307-637-6428) or your favorite local nursery. CODE KEY- The code key below will assist you in selecting for appropriate characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Thistles of Colorado
    Thistles of Colorado About This Guide Identification and Management Guide Many individuals, organizations and agencies from throughout the state (acknowledgements on inside back cover) contributed ideas, content, photos, plant descriptions, management information and printing support toward the completion of this guide. Mountain thistle (Cirsium scopulorum) growing above timberline Casey Cisneros, Tim D’Amato and the Larimer County Department of Natural Resources Weed District collected, compiled and edited information, content and photos for this guide. Produced by the We welcome your comments, corrections, suggestions, and high Larimer County quality photos. If you would like to contribute to future editions, please contact the Larimer County Weed District at 970-498- Weed District 5769 or email [email protected] or [email protected]. Front cover photo of Cirsium eatonii var. hesperium by Janis Huggins Partners in Land Stewardship 2nd Edition 1 2 Table of Contents Introduction 4 Introduction Native Thistles (Pages 6-20) Barneyby’s Thistle (Cirsium barnebyi) 6 Cainville Thistle (Cirsium clacareum) 6 Native thistles are dispersed broadly Eaton’s Thistle (Cirsium eatonii) 8 across many Colorado ecosystems. Individual species occupy niches from Elk or Meadow Thistle (Cirsium scariosum) 8 3,500 feet to above timberline. These Flodman’s Thistle (Cirsium flodmanii) 10 plants are valuable to pollinators, seed Fringed or Fish Lake Thistle (Cirsium 10 feeders, browsing wildlife and to the centaureae or C. clavatum var. beauty and diversity of our native plant americanum) communities. Some non-native species Mountain Thistle (Cirsium scopulorum) 12 have become an invasive threat to New Mexico Thistle (Cirsium 12 agriculture and natural areas. For this reason, native and non-native thistles neomexicanum) alike are often pulled, mowed, clipped or Ousterhout’s or Aspen Thistle (Cirsium 14 sprayed indiscriminately.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Speciation with External Barriers: Encelia
    Hybridspeciationwithexternalbarriers: Encelia (Asteraceae:Heliantheae),acasestudy CurtisClarkandGerardJ.Allan BiologicalSciences,CaliforniaStatePolytechnicUniversity,Pomona,andRanchoSantaAnaBotanicGarden Abstract Most well-documented cases of homoploid hybrid speciation follow the recombinational model, in which the new species passes through a period of genetic rearrangement and reduced fertility. An alternate model has been presented, in which external barriers to gene flow prevent genetic swamping of the new species by the parent species. The two documented cases of hybrid speciation in Encelia (E. virginensis and E. asperifolia) appear to follow this model. In both cases, the species of hybrid origin are morphologically intermediate to the parents, and E. virginensis is also similar to artificial F1 hybrids. In both cases, the species of hybrid origin share random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers with each of the parent species. A single sampled individual of each species of hybrid origin combines the nrDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences of its parents. All North American Encelia species are obligate outcrossers with n = 18 chromosomes, and in cultivation they form fertile hybrids apparently in all combinations. In the natural environment, plants of F1 phenotype are locally common, but backcross progeny are rare, being confined primarily to areas of human disturbance, and there is no evidence of introgression. Progeny tests in one case of natural hybridisation suggested that backcross progeny are eliminated after seed dispersal. This suggests that the F1 phenotype represents a “local optimum” on the selective landscape, and that the selection against backcrosses strongly reduces gene flow between the incipient hybrid species and the parents. Espèciation hybride avec barrières externes: Encelia (Asteraceae: Heliantheae), une étude de cas La plupart des cas bien documentés de l’espèciation homoploïde hybride suivent le modèle recombinaisonal, où l’espèce nouvelle passe par une durée de réarrangement génétique et la fertilité reduite.
    [Show full text]
  • COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha Minima in Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada THREATENED 2012 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 37 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 18 pp. Smith, B. 1998. COSEWIC status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-18 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Sue Michalsky for writing the status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Bruce Bennett and Erich Haber, Co-chairs of the COSEWIC Vascular Plants Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la Cryptanthe minuscule (Cryptantha minima) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Tiny Cryptantha — Source: Environment Canada 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Bundleflower (Desmanthus Illinoensis) Story by Alan Shadow, Manager USDA-NRCS East Texas Plant Materials Center Nacogdoches, Texas
    Helping People Help The Land September/October 2011 Issue No. 11 The Reverchon Naturalist Recognizing the work of French botanist Julien Reverchon, who began collecting throughout the North Central Texas area in 1876, and all the botanists/naturalists who have followed ... Drought, Heat and Native Trees ranging from simple things like more extensive root systems, to more drastic measures like pre- Story by Bruce Kreitler mature defoliation, what they actually have little Abilene, Texas defense against is a very prolonged period of no appreciable water supply. nybody that has traveled in Texas this year A will have noticed that not only most of the By the way, even though they are usually the land browned out, but also if you look at the trees same species, there is a difference in landscape in the fields and beside the roads, they aren't trees and native trees, which are untended plants looking so good either. It doesn't take a rocket that have to fend for themselves. While they are scientist to realize that extreme high temperatures indeed the same basic trees, the differences be- combined with, and partially caused by, drought tween the environments that they live in are huge are hard on trees. and thus overall general environmental factors such as drought, temperature, and insect infesta- Since I'm pretty sure that most of the people read- tions act on them differently. For the purposes of ing this article understand very well that drought this article, I'm referring to trees that are on their is a problem for trees, the question isn't is the pre- own, untended for their entire lives in fields, pas- sent drought going to have an effect on trees, but tures, forests, or just wherever nature has placed rather, what are the present effects of the drought them and refer to them as native trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2010/347 ON THE COVER Mount Rainier and meadow courtesy of 2007 Mount Rainier National Park Vegetation Crew Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2010/347 Regina M. Rochefort North Cascades National Park Service Complex 810 State Route 20 Sedro-Woolley, Washington 98284 June 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Dave T. (Scott) Kesonie Ronald L
    A FLORISTIC INVENTORY OF GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK, PINYON PEAK HIGHLANDS, AND VICINITY, WYOMING, U.S.A. Dave T. (Scott) Kesonie Ronald L. Hartman 1132 N. Pine Dr. Rocky Mountain Herbarium Bailey, Colorado 80421, U.S.A. Department of Botany, Dept. 3165 [email protected] University of Wyoming 1000 E. University Ave. Laramie, Wyoming 82071, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT Federal lands totaling 766 mi2 (198,393 ha) of Grand Teton National Park, the John D. Rockefeller Jr. Memorial Parkway, Bridger-Teton National Forest (Pinyon Peak Highlands), and Targhee National Forest (Wyoming’s northern portion) were inventoried. Collected were 8,002 vouchers of vascular plants at 375 locations. They represent 962 unique taxa (904 species) in 347 genera and 86 families. For the Park and Parkway proper, the relevant numbers are 909 unique taxa (861 species, 42 infraspecies, and 6 hybrids); 112 of which are new records. One escaped ornamental was documented as new to the State. Species of conservation concern (Wyoming Natural Diversity Database) totaled 42. Exotics to North America (72 unique taxa) represented 7.5 percent of the flora, a relatively low number when compared to similar inventories in Wyoming. RESUMEN Fueron inventariados territorios Federales que totalizan 766 millas cuadradas (198,393 ha) del Grand Teton National Park, el John D. Rockefeller Jr. Memorial Parkway, Bridger-Teton National Forest (Pinyon Peak Highlands), y Targhee National Forest (porción norte de Wyoming). Se colectaron 8,002 testigos de plantas vasculares en 375 localizaciones. Estos representan 962 taxa únicos (904 especies) de 347 géneros y 86 familias. Para el Park y Parkway propiamente dicho, los números son 909 taxa únicos (861 especies, 42 taxa infraes- pecíficos, 6 híbridos); 112 de los cuales son nuevas citas.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado
    Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Peggy Lyon and Julia Hanson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 December 2005 Cover: Imperiled (G1 and G2) plants of the San Juan Public Lands, top left to bottom right: Lesquerella pruinosa, Draba graminea, Cryptantha gypsophila, Machaeranthera coloradoensis, Astragalus naturitensis, Physaria pulvinata, Ipomopsis polyantha, Townsendia glabella, Townsendia rothrockii. Executive Summary This survey was a continuation of several years of rare plant survey on San Juan Public Lands. Funding for the project was provided by San Juan National Forest and the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management. Previous rare plant surveys on San Juan Public Lands by CNHP were conducted in conjunction with county wide surveys of La Plata, Archuleta, San Juan and San Miguel counties, with partial funding from Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO); and in 2004, public lands only in Dolores and Montezuma counties, funded entirely by the San Juan Public Lands. Funding for 2005 was again provided by San Juan Public Lands. The primary emphases for field work in 2005 were: 1. revisit and update information on rare plant occurrences of agency sensitive species in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) database that were last observed prior to 2000, in order to have the most current information available for informing the revision of the Resource Management Plan for the San Juan Public Lands (BLM and San Juan National Forest); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]