Seed and Vegetation Dynamics in Undamaged and Degraded Coastal Habitats of the Hudson Bay Lowlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seed and Vegetation Dynamics in Undamaged and Degraded Coastal Habitats of the Hudson Bay Lowlands SEED AND VEGETATION DYNAMICS IN UNDAMAGED AND DEGRADED COASTAL HABITATS OF THE HUDSON BAY LOWLANDS Esther R. Chang A thesis subrnitted in conformity with the requirernents for the Degree of Master of Science, Graduate Department of Botany, University of Toronto O Copyright by Esther Chang, 2000 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 ofCanada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue WeMhglm OnawaOfU K1AW Ottawa ON K1AW canada canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive Licence ailowing the exclusive permettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel1 reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in rnicroform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. SEED AND VEGETATION DYNAMICS IN UM)AMAGED AND DEGRADED COASTAL HABITATS OF THE HUDSON BAY LOWLANDS Esther R. Chang Degree of Master of Science Graduate Department of Botany, University of Toronto, 2000 Abstract Grubbing and grazing by increasing numbers of lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) have led to loss of vegetation and soil degradation in salt marshes and on beach ridges. These changes have had a deleterious effect on the soil seed bank by reducing density of seeds and shifting the composition from species present prior to the disturbance to invasive species. In the salt marsh, more recently degraded plots had greater revegetation potential from the remaining seed bank than plots where loss of vegetation was of long standing. Seed banks in beach-ridge soils were less affected by degradation due to the greater proportion of weedy species present in the original vegetation. Studies of the seed and vegetation dynamics in the supratidal marsh indicated that while there were no systematic differences between the seed rain in undamaged and degraded sites, degradation processes constrain recruitment at the entrapment, germination and establishment stages. This work of fact, not fiction, was made possible with the heip of numerous people. institutions and agencies from the stages of conception to the incipient birth. 1 wish to thank rny mentors at the Hudson Bay Project, R.F. Rockwell, K.F. Abraham and R.L. Jefferies for starting me down this "garden path" five years ago when 1 amived at La Pérouse Bay, an über-urbanite with raingear that self-destntcted within two hours of Wear, a trunk full of clothes that 1 didn't end up wearing and a copy of Finnegm 's Wake to amuse me during my ''free time." Thank you for showing me what collaboration between acadernic, private and govemment agencies cm accomplish, for sharing expertise and for introducing me to the landscape that has become a permanent fixture in my inner geography. 1 am endlessly indebted to those who helped to gather, record and sort data (almost thankless tasks). Thank you, Derek Cattani, Théo Charette, Lesley Gold, Elizabeth Gold, Chris Witte, Deb Tarn, Sanora Park, Anisa Myuniswalla Dawn Davidson and Cathy Chan for keeping me Company in purgatory. The scientific work wouldn't have been possible without the support, both logistic and emotional, fiom many people at La Pérouse Bay. Thank you Paul Matulo~s,Curt Vacek, Asha Mellor and Barbara Pezzanite in addition to those I mention elsewhere. Many people have helped and encouraged me during my studies at the University of Toronto. Dr. ThDickinson was my CO-authorin the second chapter and provided crucial help with the development of the seed key. Dr. Temy Carleton patiently answered my many questions about multivariate statistics. Between the two of thern, I have fiddled iii with more quirky DOS-based programs than 1 care to rernember. Dr. Peter Kotanen and Linley Jesson kindl y answered my numerous and various questions about statistics. 1 am especially gratefùl to my lab-mates, Tanya Handa, Brian Milakovic and Hugh Henry, for sharing space with a self-confessed neat fieak, much laughter and helping me through those times that we had to close the door. I'm also thankfùl to Andrea Case, Bill Draper, Richard Joos, Tomau Gradowski, Eliot McIntire, Christina Heidom, Tara Negwani, Darlene Lim and Nadia Talent for sharing their time, kwwledge and fkiendship with me. Esther Lévesque and Dr. Richard Staniforth kindly provided rnany seed bank referenccs at the beginning of this project. To my parents, Hwal Chun and Grace, 1owe too much to be expressed for years of love and encouragement. 1 thank my siblings, Angela, Cathy and Alex, for put~gup with stress and impatience these last few months and giving up their Thanksgiving (for al1 intents and purposes) when the computer at school crashed the weekend before the thesis was due. 1 thank my family for bearing my idiosyncracies, learning my idiolect and listening to my dreams, both waking and sleeping, for a11 these years. Funding was provided by a University of Toronto Open Fellowship and the Department of Northem and Indian Wairs. Finally, 1 am fervently grateful to my supervisor, Dr. RL. Jefferies. Bob, thank you for listening to a "prov~cative~~girl who said, "1 want to go up north, Dr. Jefferies." You have been an exemplary mode1 on the rewards of good time management (8 to 6, 10 to bed), enthusiasm, discipline, dipiomacy, strategic understatement and generosity in both the public and private spheres. Now, if only 1 find something that I'm as passionate about as you are about goose poop. Thank you. Abstract ii Acknow ledgements iii Table of contents v List of tables ix List of figures xi List of appendices xv Chapter One: Introduction 1. i Opening Statement 1.2 Formation of soil seed banks in relation to gradients of disturbance and stress 1.2.1 What is the effect of disturbance on the soi1 seed bank? 1.2.2 What is the effect of stress on the soi1 seed bank? 1.3 Vegetation loss and soil degradation processes at La Pérouse Bay in relation to seed bank dynamics 1.3.1 Site and vegetation description 1.3.2 Effect of lesser snow geese on the vegetation and on edaphic conditions in coastal marshes 1.4 Seed and vegetation dynamics: availability of diaspores vs. "de sites" 1.5 Seed bank dynamics and revegetation at La Pérouse Bay Chapter Two: Seed flom of La Pénnw Bay, Manitoba, Canada; a DELTA database of morphologid and ecoIogid characters 2.1 Introduction 25 2.2 Materials and Methods 2.2.1 Data and specimen collection 2.2.2 Database and key development 2.2.3 Taxa 2.2.4 Characters 2.2.5 Multivariate data anaiysis 2.2.6 Illustrations 2.3 ResuIts 2.3.1 Taxa 2.3.2 Characters 2.3.3 Multivariate data anaiysis 2.3.4 Illustrations 2.3.5 Availability of database 2.4 Discussion Chapter Three: Effcet of degradation on the vegetation and dbank in coastnl salt-mmh and beach-ridge habitats 3.1 Introduction 57 3.2 Materials and methods 3.2.1 Collection of seed bank and vegetation data 3.2.2 Collection of environmental data 3.2.3 Data analyses 3 -3 Results 3 -3.1 Vegetabon 3 -3-2 Soi1 seed bank 3.3-3 Vegetation ordination wnstrained by seed bank 3.3.4 Seed bank ordination wnstrained by vegetation 3.4 Discussion Chapter Four: Chapter Four: Eff'of degradation on sud min, seed genniaatioa and trrly seedling establishment in tbe supmtidal marsh 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Materials and Methods 4.2.1 Site description 4.2.2 Collection of seed min data 4.2.3 Effect of salinity on seed germination 4.2.4 Effecî of salinity on early establishment 4.3 Results 4.3.1 Seed rain 4.3.2Germination and salinity 4.3 -3 Salinity and early seedling establishment 4.4 Discussion 4.4.1 Seed rain 4.4.2 Seed germination 4.4.3 Establishment vii Chapter Fivc: Cenerd discussion 5.1 Responses of vegetaîion and soi1 seed bank to disnirbance adstress as a fùnction of the Me history of plants 5.2 Constraints imposed by disturbance and stress on the seed bank dynarnics 5.3 Applications of statisticd rnethods to studies of seed banks 5.4 The potential role of seed sources in revegetation at La Pérouse Bay List of Tables Table 1. Three hypothetical combinations of life-cycle traits repmmted by groups A to C. Each combination represents one corner of the aiangular diagram of Fig. 1, by reading this diagram counter-clockwise. As the value of one of three traits is determined by the way the diagram is read, these vaîues are placed between brackets (modified from van Groenendael et al. 1998). Table 2. Processes involved in the successful invasion of a gap by a given 21 plam species and charactas of the gaps that may be important. Modified fiom Gmbb (1 977). Table 3. Preliminary flowering plant species checklist for La Pérouse Bay. Frequency of species was assessed subjectively and includes five classes (dominant, abundant, frequent, occasional, rare) with qualifying prefix "locally" as described in Kershaw & Looney (1985). Identification (LD.) numbn were assigned for species containeci in the database. Arctostqhyhs spp.. Hi+s spp.. Salix spp. & SfeIkàrïa spp. were uhimately collapsed into genera in the database.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2
    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Literaturverzeichnis
    Literaturverzeichnis Abaimov, A.P., 2010: Geographical Distribution and Ackerly, D.D., 2009: Evolution, origin and age of Genetics of Siberian Larch Species. In Osawa, A., line ages in the Californian and Mediterranean flo- Zyryanova, O.A., Matsuura, Y., Kajimoto, T. & ras. Journal of Biogeography 36, 1221–1233. Wein, R.W. (eds.), Permafrost Ecosystems. Sibe- Acocks, J.P.H., 1988: Veld Types of South Africa. 3rd rian Larch Forests. Ecological Studies 209, 41–58. Edition. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, Abbadie, L., Gignoux, J., Le Roux, X. & Lepage, M. 146 pp. (eds.), 2006: Lamto. Structure, Functioning, and Adam, P., 1990: Saltmarsh Ecology. Cambridge Uni- Dynamics of a Savanna Ecosystem. Ecological Stu- versity Press. Cambridge, 461 pp. dies 179, 415 pp. Adam, P., 1994: Australian Rainforests. Oxford Bio- Abbott, R.J. & Brochmann, C., 2003: History and geography Series No. 6 (Oxford University Press), evolution of the arctic flora: in the footsteps of Eric 308 pp. Hultén. Molecular Ecology 12, 299–313. Adam, P., 1994: Saltmarsh and mangrove. In Groves, Abbott, R.J. & Comes, H.P., 2004: Evolution in the R.H. (ed.), Australian Vegetation. 2nd Edition. Arctic: a phylogeographic analysis of the circu- Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. marctic plant Saxifraga oppositifolia (Purple Saxi- 395–435. frage). New Phytologist 161, 211–224. Adame, M.F., Neil, D., Wright, S.F. & Lovelock, C.E., Abbott, R.J., Chapman, H.M., Crawford, R.M.M. & 2010: Sedimentation within and among mangrove Forbes, D.G., 1995: Molecular diversity and deri- forests along a gradient of geomorphological set- vations of populations of Silene acaulis and Saxi- tings.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants on the North Slope | the North Slope Borough
    8/17/2020 Common Plants on the North Slope | The North Slope Borough CALENDAR CONTACT Harry K. Brower Jr. , Mayor COMMON PLANTS ON THE NORTH SLOPE Home » Departments » Wildlife Management » Other Topics of Interest » Common Plants on the North Slope Plants are an important subsistence resource for residents across the North Slope. This page provides information on some of the common plants found on the North Slope of Alaska, including plants not used for subsistence. Plant names (common, scientific and Iñupiaq) are provided as well as descriptions, pictures and traditional uses. The resources used for identification are listed here as well as other resources for information on plants. List of Common Plants and others of the North Slope PDF Version Photo Identification of these Common Plants Unknowns - Got any ideas? Please send them to us! Plant Identification and Other Resources Thes pages are a work in progress. If you see any misinformation, misidentifications, or have pictures to add, please contact us. Information on the Iñupiaq names and traditional uses of these plants is especially welcomed. Check out "Unknown" pictures at bottom of page. Thanks! DISCLAIMER: This guide includes traditional uses of plants and other vegetation. The information is not intended to replace the advice of a physician or be used as a guide for self- medication. Neither the author nor the North Slope Borough claims that information in this guide will cure any illness. Just as prescription medicines can have different effects on www.north-slope.org/departments/wildlife-management/other-topics/common-plants-north-slope 1/3 8/17/2020 Common Plants on the North Slope | The North Slope Borough individuals, so too can plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomarbeit
    Diplomarbeit vorgelegt zur Erlangung des Grades eines Diplom-Biologen an der Fakultät für Biologie und Biotechnologie der Ruhr-Universität Bochum Phylogenie der Brandpilzgattung Urocystis von Sascha Lotze-Engelhard Angefertigt im LS Evolution und Biodiversität der Pflanzen, AG Geobotanik Bochum im Dezember 2010 Referent: Prof. Dr. D. Begerow Koreferent: Prof. Dr. R. Tollrian 2 ҅Fungi have a profound impact on global ecosystems. They modify our habitats and are essential for many ecosystem functions. Fungi form soil, recycle nutrients, decay wood, enhance plant growth and cull plants from their environment. They feed us, poison us, parasitize us and cure us. They destroy our crops, homes and libraries, but they also produce valuable biochemicals, such as ethanol and antibiotics. For both practical and intellectual reasons it is important to provide a phylogeny of Fungi on which a classi- fication can be firmly based. ҆ (Blackwell u.a. 2006) Inhaltsverzeichnis 3 Inhaltsverzeichnis Inhaltsverzeichnis ........................................................................................................... 3 Abbildungsverzeichnis .................................................................................................... 6 Tabellenverzeichnis ........................................................................................................ 7 Abkürzungsverzeichnis .................................................................................................. 8 1 Einleitung ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Dynamics of Coastal Ecosystems of the Russian Arctic
    Petrozavodsk State University Structure and dynamics of coastal ecosystems of the Russian Arctic Liudmila Sergienko, DSc (Biology), Prof. Petrozavodsk State University, Ecological-biological Faculty, Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Lenina, 33, Petrozavodsk 185910, Russia E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] ABOUT THE AUTHOR Liudmila Sergienko, Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russia Graduated Botanical department Leningrad State University. Since 1971 took part in numerous expeditions in Kanin peninsula, Gulf of Finland, Kolyma river, Chukotka peninsula, White sea, Barents sea, East-Siberian sea, Chukchi sea, Bering sea. Doctoral thesis devoted to salt marsh flora and vegetation of the Russian Arctic. More than 25 years worked at the Komarov Botanical institute of Russian Academy of Sciences. Since1997 full professor in Petrozavodsk State University. Continues active investigations and teaching. Published more than 80 articles, several monographs, manuals and tutorials. Participates in number of national and international projects. Contributed several comprehensive international reviews - State of the Arctic Coast 2010; Atlas of Marine and Coastal Biological Diversity of the Russian Arctic 2011. Arctic coastal ecosystems Arctic coastal ecosystems are vulnerable both to climate change and active industrial development. The “proactive ecosystem management” is one of many mitigation strategies in this case. This demands good background knowledge on ecosystem structural and functional characteristics. The ongoing global climate changes and the growing man impact influence lead to the disruption of functioning of natural complex of the Arctic coastal zone, which results in the disturbance of human activity affecting human health. Kolyma river mouth Salt marshes in the (Chukotka peninsula) Pechora river mouth 2 Salt marshes Salt marshes are the part of coastal zone of the low-lying coasts of the seas, flooded during periods of high tides and surges of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Studies on the Carex Satina Complex (Cyperaceae, Section Cryptocarpae) in Northeastern North America1
    Cytologia 51: 817-856, 1986 Chromosome Studies on the Carex satina Complex (Cyperaceae, Section Cryptocarpae) in Northeastern North America1 Jacques Cayouette2 Departement de Phytologie and Centre d'Etudes nordiques, Universite Laval, Quebec, G1K 7P4, Canada and Pierre Morisset Departement de Biologie and Centre d'Etudes nordiques, Universite Laval, Quebec, G1K 7P4, Canada Accepted October 9, 1985 The first chromosome studies on Carex were done by Juel (1900) and Stout (1913). The most important ones were done by Heilborn (1924, 1928, 1939), Ta naka from 1937 to 1941 and Wahl (1940). More recent informations and exhaustive bibliographies are given by Davies (1956), Love et al. (1957) and Faulkner (1972). Some cytological features of the genus Carex (and Cyperaceae) are unique. These are 1)the abortion of three of the potential microspores of each tetrad (Fig. 5), 2) a post-reductional meiosis in which the first meiotic division is equational and the second reductional, and 3) the long aneuploid series with haploid numbers ranging from n=6 to n=56, probably due mainly to the unlocalized centromeric activity of the chromosomes. Chromosome numbers of about 400 of the 2500 species of Carex (according to Nelmes 1952) are recorded by Fedorov (1969); this number could probably reach 500 if an exhaustive updated compilation was made. However, detailed cytological studies of whole sections of Carex are scarce. Extensive.works exist only for the Acutae (now Phacocystis) (Faulkner 1972, 1973), Capillares (Love et al., 1957), Extensae (Davies 1955, Schmid 1982) and Frigidae (Dietrich 1967). The taxonomically difficultsection Cryptocarpae, which includes the Carex sauna complex, has not been cytologically studied in extenso.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Root Colonization of Puccinellia Frigida (Phil.) Johnston, a Dominant Grass Species Inhabiting the Margins of High-Altitude Hypersaline Andean Wetlands
    Accepted Manuscript Title: Fungal root colonization of Puccinellia frigida (Phil.) Johnston, a dominant grass species inhabiting the margins of high-altitude hypersaline Andean wetlands Author: <ce:author id="aut0005"> Silvani Vanesa<ce:author id="aut0010"> Rothen Carolina<ce:author id="aut0015"> Rodr´ıguez Mar´ıa Alejandra<ce:author id="aut0020"> Cisneros Gabriela<ce:author id="aut0025"> Godeas Alicia<ce:author id="aut0030"> Aranda-Rickert Adriana<ce:author id="aut0035"> Fracchia Sebastian´ PII: S0304-3770(13)00039-9 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2013.03.001 Reference: AQBOT 2554 To appear in: Aquatic Botany Received date: 29-9-2011 Revised date: 2-3-2013 Accepted date: 5-3-2013 Please cite this article as: Vanesa, S., Carolina, R., Alejandra, R.M., Gabriela, C., Alicia, G., Adriana, A.-R., Sebastian,´ F., Fungal root colonization of Puccinellia frigida (Phil.) Johnston, a dominant grass species inhabiting the margins of high-altitude hypersaline Andean wetlands, Aquatic Botany (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2013.03.001 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Highlights Highligths 1-Diverse root
    [Show full text]
  • Mpu Diesel Spill Vegetation Monitoring
    POINT MCINTYRE PM-1 REMEDIATION AREA ARMY PERMIT (14-900163, BEAUFORT SEA 428) 2001 PROGRESS REPORT ON SOIL, SURFACE WATER, AND VEGETATION CONDITIONS TO: BP EXPLORATION (ALASKA), INC. ANCHORAGE, ALASKA FROM: JAY D. MCKENDRICK LAZY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH COMPANY, LLC PALMER, ALASKA MAY 2002 FRONT COVER: Aerial oblique view of PM-1 production pad, 22 July 2000. Area of investigation lies along the upper edge of the pad to the left of the pit extension. Note the smooth textured surface north of the pad represents a tundra surface younger than that of the rough dark, highly polygonized surface to the south and east of the pad. See Photo 2 for water salinity readings measured at this location. INTRODUCTION fibrous peat. The A horizon is a humus layer consisting of mineral soil and partially decomposed peat. The B horizon is a sandy This report contains a summary of the mineral material. environmental investigation and revegetation progress during the 1998-2001 period at the PM-1 Within the area in question, a layer of drilling production pad. mud, 2 to 8 in thick overlies the natural soil profile surface. There is also a thin layer of gravel Historical background on the drilling mud surface. This gravel appeared to have been carried from the production pad An area of wet sedge tundra affected by drilling during winter snow removal. mud and gravel on the north edge of the PM-1 (Point McIntyre) production pad was required to Vegetation be remediated. In 1998, ARCO Alaska, Inc. requested Lazy Mountain Research’s technical Vegetation at this location is a wet sedge meadow services to evaluate the site conditions and dominated by rhizomatous sedges and grasses.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Aberdeen Disturbance, Recovery and Tundra Vegetation
    University of Aberdeen Disturbance, recovery and tundra vegetation change Van der Wal, Rene; Anderson, Helen; Stien, Audun; Loe, Leif Egil; Speed, James Publication date: 2020 Document Version Early version, also known as pre-print Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Van der Wal, R., Anderson, H., Stien, A., Loe, L. E., & Speed, J. (2020). Disturbance, recovery and tundra vegetation change: Final report project 17/92 - to Svalbard Environmental Protection Fund. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. ? Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. ? You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain ? You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 Disturbance, recovery and tundra vegetation change Final report project 17/92 - to Svalbard Environmental Protection Fund René van der Wal1,2, Helen Anderson1, Audun Stien3, Leif Egil Loe4 and James Speed5 1 University of Aberdeen, School of Biological Sciences, Scotland, UK 2 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Dept. of Ecology, Uppsala, Sweden 3 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 017.Pdf
    Response of arctic sedges to release from grazing: leaf elongation in two species of Carex P. M. KOTANEN Response of arctic sedges to release from grazing: leaf elongation in two species of Carex AND R. L. JEFFERIES' Department of Botany, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada M5S 1Al Received May 10, 1988 KOTANEPN. ,M., and JEFFERIERS., L. 1989. Responses of arctic sedges to release from grazing: leaf elongation in two species of Carex. Can. J. Bot. 67: 1414-1419. Abstract We have used demographic methods to determine whether increased rates of leaf elongation occur in two sedges, Carex subspathacea Wormsk and Carex xflavicans Nyl., when heavily grazed by Lesser Snow Geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens (L.)) at La Perouse Bay, Manitoba. Rates of elongation of leaves declined as leaves aged. Most comparisons between grazed and ungrazed plots indicated that rates of elongation of leaves of grazed shoots were not significantly greater than corresponding rates for ungrazed shoots. No trends were evident. As reported elsewhere, increased production and turnover of leaves accounted for most of the regeneration of photosynthetic area following grazing in both species. Introduction Much of the resistance of grasses and sedges to the deleterious effects of grazing is attributable to the positions of their meristems. The basal (intercalary) meristem of a graminoid leaf is located close to the shoot; this meristem often escapes damage by grazers, so that regrowth of clipped leaves is pos- sible following grazing (Hyder 1972; Dahl and Hyder 1977; Harper 1977; Crawley 1983; McNaughton 1983). In some grasses and sedges, increased rates of elongation of leaves following grazing are an important intrinsic (physiological) mechanism, whereby a tiller regenerates its photosynthetic surface area after grazing (McNaughton 1983; McNaughton et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Mingan Archipelago National Park Reserve • Common
    Mingan Archipelago National Park Reserve Flora • Common Name (Order Family Genus species) Monocotyledons • Adder's-mouth, White (Orchidales Orchidaceae Malaxis monophyllos brachypoda) • Alkaligrass, Creeping (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Puccinellia phryganodes) • Alkaligrass, Dwarf (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Puccinellia pumila) • Arrowgrass, Gaspé Peninsula (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin gaspensis) • Arrowgrass, Marsh (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin palustris) • Arrowgrass, Seaside (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin maritima) • Arrowgrass, Marsh (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin palustris) • Asphodel, Scottish False (Liliales Liliaceae Tofieldia pusilla) • Barley, Foxtail (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Hordeum jubatum) • Beak-rush, White (Cyperales Cyperaceae Rhynchospora alba) • Bentgrass, Creeping (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Agrostis stolonifera) • Bentgrass, Green (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Calamagrostis stricta) • Bentgrass, Rough (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Agrostis scabra) • Bluegrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Poa alpina) • Bluegrass, Annua (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Poa annua) • Bluegrass, Arctic (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Poa arctica) • Bluegrass, Glaucous (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Poa glauca) • Bluegrass, Wood (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Poa nemoralis) • Bluegrass, Marsh (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Poa palustris) • Bluegrass, Kentucky (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Poa pratensis alpigena) • Bluegrass, Kentucky (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Poa pratensis pratensis) • Brome, Awnless (Poales Poaceae/Graminae Bromus inermis) • Brome, Fringed (Poales Poaceae/Graminae
    [Show full text]