THE PRIEST and the GREAT KING Temple-Palace Relations in the Persian Empire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE PRIEST and the GREAT KING Temple-Palace Relations in the Persian Empire THE PRIEST AND THE GREAT KING BIBLICAL AND JUDAIC STUDIES FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Volume 10 edited by William H. C. Propp Previously published in the series: 1. The Hebrew Bible and Its Interpreters, edited by William Henry Propp, Baruch Halpern, and David Noel Freedman (1990). 2. Studies in Hebrew and Aramaic Orthography, by David Noel Freedman, A. Dean Forbes, and Francis I. Andersen (1992). 3. Isaiah 46, 47, and 48: A New Literary-Critical Reading, by Chris Franke (1994). 4. The Book around Immanuel: Style and Structure in Isaiah 2–12, by Andrew H. Bartelt (1996). 5. The Structure of Psalms 93–100, by David M. Howard Jr. (1997). 6. Psalm 119: The Exaltation of Torah, by David Noel Freedman (1999). 7. Between Heaven and Earth: Divine Presence and Absence in the Book of Ezekiel, by John F. Kutsko (2000). 8. The Storm-God in the Ancient Near East, by Alberto R. W. Green (2003). 9. Le-David Maskil: A Birthday Tribute to David Noel Freedman, edited by Richard Elliott Friedman and William H. C. Propp (2004). THE PRIEST AND THE GREAT KING Temple-Palace Relations in the Persian Empire Lisbeth S. Fried EISENBRAUNS Winona Lake, Indiana 2004 Published for Biblical and Judaic Studies The University of California, San Diego by Eisenbrauns Winona Lake, Indiana ç Copyright 2004 by Lisbeth S. Fried. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Cataloging in Publication Data Fried, Lisbeth S. The priest and the great king : temple-palace relations in the Persian Empire / Lisbeth S. Fried p. cm. — (Biblical and Judaic studies from the University of California, San Diego ; v. 10) Revision of the author’s thesis (doctoral)—New York University Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 1-57506-090-6 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Iran—Politics and government. 2. Iran—History—To 640. 3. Temples—Middle East—History—To 1500. 4. Religion and politics—Middle East—History—To 1500. I. Title. II. Biblical and Judaic studies ; v. 10. DS275.F67 2004 322u.1u0935—dc22 2004009806 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.†‰ Dedicated to Gerda Seligson (luuz) (1909–2002) Vale Contents Preface . ix Abbreviations . xi Chapter 1. Introduction . 1 The Problem 2 The Theory of Self-Governance 2 The Theory of Persian Imperial Authorization 3 The Model of Bureaucratic Empires 4 Methodology 6 Chapter 2. Temple-Palace Relations in Babylonia . 8 Sources and Methodological Limitations 8 Temple Personnel 9 Temple-Palace Relations under Nabonidus and Cyrus 20 The Resources of the Temple and Their Allocation 35 Conclusion 47 Chapter 3. Temple-Palace Relations in Egypt . 49 The Pharaoh 50 The Temple 54 The Impact of Achaemenid Rule 63 The Jewish Garrison at Elephantine 92 Conclusion 106 Chapter 4. Temple-Palace Relations in Asia Minor . 108 Darius’s Letter to Gadatas 108 Border Dispute between Miletus and Myus 119 The Donation of Droaphernes 129 A Decree of Mylasa against the Opponents of Mausolus 137 The Trilingual Inscription of Xanthus 140 Conclusion 154 vii viii Contents Chapter 5. Temple-Palace Relations in Yehud . 156 A Model of Achaemenid Rule 156 Sources and Problems for the Study of Judah 157 The Restoration of the Temple of Yhwh in Jerusalem 158 Cyrus the Messiah and a Divine Quid Pro Quo 177 The Political Organization of Persian Period Yehud 183 Nehemiah’s Mission and the Ensuing Political Struggle 193 Ezra’s Mission 212 Yo˙anan the Priest 227 Alexander 231 Yaddua, the High Priest of the Jews 232 Conclusion 233 Appendix . 234 Kings of Ancient Mesopotamia 234 Egyptian Pharaohs 235 Map: Cities and Islands of the Aegean Sea . 236 Bibliography . 237 Indexes Index of Authors . 259 Index of Scripture . 264 Preface When I began graduate school in 1989, the Persian period, unlike others, was the Dark Age of Jewish history. The years between the temple’s destruc- tion and the rise of Alexander were a blank that the books of Ezra and Ne- hemiah could not fill. Noticeably missing was a description of the change in Judah from monarchy to theocracy. At the time of the First Temple’s destruc- tion, a Davidic king ruled Judah. Under Alexander and the Ptolemies, the high priest reportedly led the Jewish nation. The book Ezra–Nehemiah could not get us from here to there, from monarchy to theocracy. More than by the theocracy’s unknown origin, I was haunted by the con- flicting views toward it. In Josephus, Philo, and Ben Sira, the high priest was God’s emissary on earth. According to biblical scholars, however, the Mosaic theocracy was rigid, legalistic, a “dead work,” “estranged from the heart,” a source of opprobrium.1 I want to know if the Jewish priesthood did accrue secular power, and if so, how it exercised this power in relation to the imperial forces that sur- rounded it. I write in an unabashed attempt to defend it. I do so by setting it in its ancient Near Eastern context. Rather than focusing on the Judean priesthood, I try to understand the role of any priest in the ancient world. I want to know if theocracies arose in other parts of the Persian Empire, and if so, how, and if not, why not. I believe that the Jews and the Jewish priest- hood were not unique and that whatever was true of other temples and other temple cities in the face of imperial domination and control would also be true of the Temple of Yhwh and of Jerusalem. Acknowledgments This book is a complete revision of my Ph.D. dissertation. Neither the dissertation nor this book could have been written without help and wise in- struction. The dissertation was conceived in the classrooms of Peter Ma- chinist and Haim Tadmor at the University of Michigan but was brought to the birthstool at New York University’s Department of Hebrew and Judaic Studies. At the risk of belaboring the metaphor, I would add that its mid- wives were my adviser, Baruch A. Levine, and my committee: Daniel Flem- ing, Gernot Windfuhr, William Arnal, S. David Sperling, and Lawrence 1. E.g., Wellhausen, Prolegomena, 425. Please note that in this book source references are abbreviated in the footnotes. The full citations are found in the bibliography. ix x Preface Schiffman. I add Bezalel Porten who, although not on the committee, read every word of the dissertation and made critical suggestions at every point. Although he may not agree with its conclusions, this book bears the stamp of his imprint. Gary Beckman, Lester Cole, Eugene Cruz-Uribe, Victor Horowitz, Yonatan Nadelman, Carolyn Thorpe, and Norman Yoffee were there when I needed them for suggestions, counsel, and advice. Thank you. I want to express a special note of gratitude to David Noel Freedman for his interest and concern, and for mentoring me all through my graduate ca- reer and beyond. It is greatly appreciated; I hope I continue to merit it. I thank William Propp and his committee for accepting this book into their series, and for their critical suggestions. The dissertation and now the book could not have been written without the University of Michigan’s Department of Near Eastern Studies. Their willingness to provide me a home, library, e-mail, and access to their out- standing faculty is gratefully appreciated. It would not have become a book, however, without the efforts of Beverly McCoy and Jim Eisenbraun and all of the folks at Eisenbrauns; their efforts are greatly appreciated. I want to thank my husband, Michael, who suffered through four years without a wife while I commuted to New York every week. He has supported me unflinchingly and without complaints in all my endeavors. He has been the wind beneath my wings. Finally, I dedicate this book in love to the mem- ory of my teacher and friend Gerda Seligson, lòòz , of the University of Mich- igan’s Classics department. She patiently taught me Greek, Latin, and so much more. Vale. Abbreviations General AO Antiquités orientales: Tablets in the collections of the Musée du Louvre BIN Babylonian Inscriptions in the Collection of James B. Nies BM Tablets in the Collections of the British Museum BRM Babylonian Records in the Library of J. Pierpont Morgan CBSTablets in the Collections of the University Museum of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia DB Bihistun (Bisitun) Inscription of Darius DNa Inscription A of Darius at Naqs-I-Rustam DNb Inscription B of Darius at Naqs-I-Rustam DSe Inscription E of Darius at Susa DSf Inscription F of Darius I at Susa ET English translation FdXFouilles de Xanthos LXX Septuagint (Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible) MT Masoretic (Hebrew) Text NRSV New Revised Standard Version of the English Bible P. P apyrus PBS Publications of the Babylonian Section, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania PN Personal name PTS Cuneiform Tablets in the Princeton Theological Seminary RhM Rheinisches Museum VATTablets in the Collections of the Staatliche Museen, Berlin XPh Inscription H of Xerxes at Persepolis YYasna YBC Tablets in the Babylonian Collection, Yale University Library Reference Works AASOR Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research AB Anchor Bible Commentary Series ABC Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles. A. K. Grayson. Texts from Cuneiform Sources 5. Locust Valley, N.Y., 1975. Reprinted: Winona Lake, Ind., 2000 xi xii Abbreviations ABD Anchor Bible Dictionary. Edited by D. N. Freedman. 6 vols. New York, 1992 ABRL Anchor Bible Reference Library ABL Assyrian and Babylonian Letters. Edited by R. F. Harper. 14 vols. Chicago, 1892–1914 AfO Archiv für Orientforschung AHw Akkadisches Handwörterbuch.
Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Index
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-66185-1 — Early Hellenistic Portraiture Edited by Peter Schultz , Ralf von den Hoff Index More Information subject index Note: Page numbers shown in bold italics indicate illustrations. Achaian dedication at Olympia, 212, 222 by Lysippos, 123–4, 219 Aphrodite, 14–15, 77, 79, 114, 167, 222 Acanthus Column at Delphi, 85 “Schwarzenberg” Alexander, 55, 126, 132, Apelles, Birth of Venus, 79 Achilles, 134, 220 219, 219 Apollo, 168 Ackland Art Museum, Univ. North Carolina tetradrachms of, 114, 114 on coinage, 114 at Chapel Hill victory medallions of, 114–15, 115 Parnopios (“Locust Apollo”), 141 fragmentary bronze head of the woman, 69 Testament of, 167 Sitalkas, 172 Ada of Caria, 18, 19, 23, 211 Alexandria, 141 Apollonios, 192 adequation (Poseidippos), 134 Temple of Sarapis at, 260 Apollonis, 168 aeisitoi, 190, 192, 194 Alkaios, 131 Apoxyomenos from Ephesos, 89, 151 Aelian, 132 Alscher, L., 89 Apulia, bell krater from, 108 agalma, 118, 162 Ammianus Marcellinus, 249 Archelaos, 114 maker of, 153 Amunomenes, 26 Archias, 16 Agasikratis, 165, 166 Amyntas, 169, 205, 213–16 Archidamos III, 14 Agathe Tyche, 197 Anakreon, 256 Archilochos, 131 Agelaos, 95, 96 anastasis, 166 Archimedes, 255 Agias, 69, 84, 88, 89, 93, 93 anathemata, 167 Archinos Phaniou Eleusinios, 149–50 agonothete, 16 anathyrosis, 225, 240 Archippe from Aixone, 19–20 Aiantis, 191 anchisteia, 144 arete¯/aretai, 134, 212 Aion, 26 andriantopoiika, 124 Argead portraits, see Leochares Aischines, 49, 89, 134, 202n70 anthippasia, 184, 191 Argos, 212 Aischylos,
    [Show full text]
  • Die Intraurbanen Grabmäler Der Klassischen Periode in Limyra Martin Seyer
    Die intraurbanen Grabmäler der klassischen Periode in Limyra Martin Seyer To cite this version: Martin Seyer. Die intraurbanen Grabmäler der klassischen Periode in Limyra. 2èmes Rencontres d’archéologie de l’IFEA : Le Mort dans la ville Pratiques, contextes et impacts des inhumations intra- muros en Anatolie, du début de l’Age du Bronze à l’époque romaine., Nov 2011, Istanbul, Turkey. pp.207-222. halshs-00808316 HAL Id: halshs-00808316 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00808316 Submitted on 5 Apr 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. DIE INTRAURBANEN GRABMÄLER DER KLASSISCHEN PERIODE IN LIMYRA* Martin Seyer Österreichisches Archäologisches Institut [email protected] Abstract Four tomb buildings of the Classical period are located within the city walls of Limyra: The Heroon of king Perikle and the remains of a tumulus, both at the acropolis; the hyposorion-sarcophagus of Xñtabura to the east of the Roman theatre, and an unfinished hyposorion sarcophagus directly above the excavated houses in the northwestern part of the living quarter. In general they are all regarded as intramural burials but as neither the city wall nor the tombs can be dated precisely the question arises, whether the term really is correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Mehmet Alkan Tez Word
    AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ Mehmet ALKAN AKHAMENİDLER DÖNEMİ’NDE PERSLERİN ANADOLU’DA TAPINAK İLİŞKİLERİ Danışman Doç. Dr. Ş. Recai TEKOĞLU Eskiçağ Dilleri ve Kültürleri Bölümü Yüksek Lisans Tezi Antalya, 2006 İÇİNDEKİLER İÇİNDEKİLER.....................................................................................................................İ KISALTMALAR................................................................................................................ İİ ÖZET.................................................................................................................................İİİ SUMMARY........................................................................................................................İV GİRİŞ ...................................................................................................................................1 1. EDEBİ KAYNAKLARA GÖRE TAPINAK İLİŞKİLERİ........................................3 1.1 İLK KRALLAR DÖNEMİ ..............................................................................................................3 1.1.1 Kyros (M. Ö. 560/59-530)..........................................................................................................3 1.1.2 Kambyses (M. Ö. 530-522).........................................................................................................6 1.1.3 I. Dareios ( M. Ö. 522-486).........................................................................................................7 1.1.3.1 Ion Ayaklanması
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Eretria
    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021
    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
    [Show full text]
  • Musa Dağı?) Definesi MÖ 390-370/360 Light of These Criteria, Mithrapata and Aruwãtijesi (Mo- Yıllarına Tarihlenebilir
    cedrus.akdeniz.edu.tr CEDRUS Cedrus VII (2019) 239-265 The Journal of MCRI DOI: 10.13113/CEDRUS/201910 MITHRAPATA VE ARUWÃTIJESI (MUSA DAĞI?) DEFİNESİ THE TREASURE OF MITHRAPATA AND ARUWÃTIJESI (MUSA DAĞI?) ∗ ∗∗ FERHAN BÜYÜKYÖRÜK AHMET ÇELİK Öz: Musa Dağı, Cıngırık Tepesi’nde Mithrapata ve Aru- Abstract: A treasure consisting of 68 silver coins belon- wãtijesi’ye ait toplam 68 adet gümüş sikkeden oluşan bir ging to Mithrapata and Aruwãtijesi were stated to have define bulunduğu belirtilmiştir. Bunun yanında define- been found in Mount Musa, Cıngırık Hill. In addition, nin ana bölümünü teşkil eden Mithrapata sikkeleri kendi Mithrapata coins, which constitute the main part of the içinde 5 gruba ayrılarak incelenmiştir. Güneydoğu Lik- treasure, were divided into 5 groups. This treasure ya’da bulunan bu define önemli bilgiler sunmakla bir- found in Southeast Lycia offers important information likte bağlantılı olduğu düşünülen Yukarı Olympos Yerle- and suggests that the Upper Olympos Settlement, şimi’nin dynastik dönem yerleşimi olabileceğini gün- which is thought to be connected, may be a dynastic deme getirmekte ve yerleşimin kuruluşu için hâlihazırda period settlement and it allows suggesting that it can be önerilen MÖ IV. yüzyıl tarihinden daha erkene gidebi- dated earlier than already suggested date of IV century leceğini önermeye imkân kılmaktadır. Definenin tarih- BC. In addition to the general history of the coins of lenmesinde öncelikle Mithrapata ve Aruwãtijesi sikkele- Mithrapata and Aruwãtijesi, the stated area where the rinin genel tarihine ek olarak, definenin bulunduğu be- treasure was found, the architectural features of its sur- lirtilen alan ve yakın civarın mimari özellikleri ile define- roundings and the status of the kylixes in which the nin içinde bulunduğu ifade edilen kylixlerin durumu treasure is stated to be located were taken into conside- gözönüne alınmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Opponents and Successors of the Xanthian Dynasty in Western Lycia: the Weχssere Questions Reconsidered
    Received: March 11, 2018 | Accepted: May 2, 2019 GEPHYRA 17, 2019, 29-81 Opponents and successors of the Xanthian dynasty in Western Lycia: The Weχssere questions reconsidered Wilhelm MÜSELER Introduction The publication of the book on Lycian coins in European private collections by the present author is approaching its third anniversary1. As expected, it has already sparked a number of interesting discussions regarding some of its central tenets. The attribution of the main text from the famous Xanthos-Stele to Χerẽi, once more emphasized in a recent article by the author and by his col- league Diether Schürr2, has found broad support and was strengthened by a new analysis of the stoichedon rules applied to the inscription by Helmut Lotz3. However, questions regarding the number and the role of the dynasts, who have been issuing coins that carry either the full or abbreviated personal name Weχssere or legends of a somewhat related form such as Waχssebllimi, Waχssepddimi or Uχssepddimi, have caused considerable con- fusion. The original hypothesis, brought forward by Kenneth Jenkins4 and subsequently accepted by most scholars studying the archaic and classical coins of Lycia, had asserted that there were two individuals called Weχssere, possibly father and son, whose issues belonged to two distinct periods of Lycian coinage: The elder and far more numerous group is in several respects related to the light weight coinage of the dynast Kuprlli from mints in Western Lycia and therefore has to be dated to the middle of the 5th century BC. The younger, considerably smaller group is mainly formed by a number of heavier coins bearing the name of the dynast in alternation with the name of the mint place Zagaba in Central Lycia in the back5.
    [Show full text]
  • A Collection of Exceptional Ancient Greek Coins
    A Collection of Exceptional Ancient Greek Coins To be sold by auction at: Sotheby’s, in the Book Room 34-35 New Bond Street London W1A 2AA Day of Sale: Monday 24 October 2011 at 11.00 am Public viewing: Morton & Eden, 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Thursday 20 October 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Friday 21 October 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Sunday 23 October 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Or by previous appointment. Catalogue no. 51 Price £15 Enquiries: Tom Eden or Stephen Lloyd Cover illustrations: Lot 160 (front); Lot 166 (back); Lot 126 (inside front and back covers) in association with 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Tel.: +44 (0)20 7493 5344 Fax: +44 (0)20 7495 6325 Email: [email protected] Website: www.mortonandeden.com This auction is conducted by Morton & Eden Ltd. in accordance with our Conditions of Business printed at the back of this catalogue. All questions and comments relating to the operation of this sale or to its content should be addressed to Morton & Eden Ltd. and not to Sotheby’s. Online Bidding Morton & Eden Ltd offer an online bidding service via www.the-saleroom.com. This is provided on the understanding that Morton & Eden Ltd shall not be responsible for errors or failures to execute internet bids for reasons including but not limited to: i) a loss of internet connection by either party; ii) a breakdown or other problems with the online bidding software; iii) a breakdown or other problems with your computer, system or internet connection.
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of the PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW Peoples Of
    A HISTORY OF THE PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW peoples of the ancient world have given rise to so much controversy as the Pelasgians; and of few, after some centuries of discussion, is so little clearly established. Like the Phoenicians, the Celts, and of recent years the Teutons, they have been a peg upon which to hang all sorts of speculation ; and whenever an inconvenient circumstance has deranged the symmetry of a theory, it has been safe to ' call it Pelasgian and pass on.' One main reason for this ill-repute, into which the Pelasgian name has fallen, has been the very uncritical fashion in which the ancient statements about the Pelasgians have commonly been mishandled. It has been the custom to treat passages from Homer, from Herodotus, from Ephorus, and from Pausanias, as if they were so many interchangeable bricks to build up the speculative edifice; as if it needed no proof that genealogies found sum- marized in Pausanias or Apollodorus ' were taken by them from poems of the same class with the Theogony, or from ancient treatises, or from prevalent opinions ;' as if, further, ' if we find them mentioning the Pelasgian nation, they do at all events belong to an age when that name and people had nothing of the mystery which they bore to the eyes of the later Greeks, for instance of Strabo;' and as though (in the same passage) a statement of Stephanus of Byzantium about Pelasgians in Italy ' were evidence to the same effect, perfectly unexceptionable and as strictly historical as the case will admit of 1 No one doubts, of course, either that popular tradition may transmit, or that late writers may transcribe, statements which come from very early, and even from contemporary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2016 – the Planchet Magazine
    The PLANCHET Magna Carta Alexander page 7 Balas page 5 Counterfeit Coins and Holders A Fine Lion page 24 Stater of Mithrapata page 17 Edmonton Numismatic Society February 2016 Volume 63 · Issue 1 Spring Show March 12th & 13th 2016 The PLANCHETVolume 63 · Issue 1 1 Message from the President Feature Articles 2 Next Meeting 5 Two Coins of Alexander Balas 3 About Your Society Ancient / Medieval by Terence Cheesman 4 Spring 2016 Show 7 The Magna Carta 24 Counterfeit Gold A Penny’s Worth by Marc Bink 25 Membership Form 17 A Fine Lion Stater of Mithrapata 26 Puzzle Page A classic Lycian dynast coin impresses with a bold lion design. 27 ENS Classifieds Amid the Ruins by Wayne Hansen 27 Coming Events The Planchet Team Editor-In-Chief Joe Kennedy Co-Editors Pierre Driessen ON THE COVER DISCLAIMER Marc Bink Tetradrachm from Tyre, 149 B.C. The opinions herein are those of the individual Wayne Hansen authors and are not necessarily those of the Content Editor King John Penny Edmonton Numismatic Society. Chris Hale The editors, at their sole discretion, reserve the Mithrapata Stater, circa 385 B.C. right to accept or refuse any material submitted On-Line Distribution Counterfeit NGC holder & coin for publication. Pierre Driessen Background: Magna Carta, 1297 Printing and Mailing Howard Gilbey ii the Planchet Message from the President Marc Bink 2016 February 2016 Happy Belated New Year! This is the year that I’d love to take care of our website issue. For those Remember So we’ve all made it through the of you who’ve been on it recently, to renew your Christmas season, New Year’s is you’ve undoubtedly noticed that becoming a distant memory, and it hasn’t changed much since its membership we’re all settling into the winter inception in 1998.
    [Show full text]