, ,0 c r- 0 c ~
)> ;c C1 I - -t I'T1 C1 -t c m n m~ 3:)> 0J(J) ::amm-l ~:::cJ .. ""D t\)1 0)> :::iz MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS
[3] INTRODUCTION - MASTER PLA N TE A M -E XECUTI VE SUMMA RY -PR OCESS - MA RKET FEAS IBILITY STUDY OVERVIEW
[8] RECOMMENDED SITE PLAN -SITE PLA N - A ERIA L VIEW
[13] RECOMMENDED FACILITY PLANS -L A NDON A REN A & EXPO REN OVATI ONS -D OM ER/ EQUINE COMPLEX REN OVATI ONS -NE W COVERED A RE NA - NEW MULTI-USE STA LLING A ND EXPO BUILDING
[23] PROJECT DETAILS LANDON ARENA -DEFERRED MA INTENA NCE -NEW PROJECTS -R ECOMMENDED A LTE RNATE S
[36] PROJECT DETAILS EXPO HALL - DEFERRED MAINTENANC E -NE W PROJECTS -R ECOMMENDED A LTE RNATES
[42] PROJECT DETAILS MULTI-USE EQUINE I EXPO -DE FERRED MA INTENA NCE -NE W PROJECTS -RE COMMENDED A LTERN ATES
[50] PROJECT DETAILS SITE -DEFERRED MA INTENA NCE -NE W PROJECTS
[54] BUDGET & SCHEDULE
[57] APPENDIX: MARKET FEASIBILITY STUDY
[116] APPENDIX: ITEMIZED PROJECT BUDGET
2 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN
MASTER PLAN TEAM
SHAWNEE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS • Commissioner Shel ly Buhler • Commissioner Kevin Cook • Commissioner Bob Archer
KANSAS EXPOCENTRE DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ADVISORY COMMITTEE • Tom Vlach, SNCO Public Works, Co-Cha ir • Bill Kroll, SNCO Facilities, Co-Chair • Brenda Block, Expocentre Advisory Board • Commissioner Shelly Buhler, SNCO • Jim Crowl, SNCO Counselor • Betty Greiner, SNCO Finance • Mary Thomas, Expoce ntre Advisory Board
• Kellen Seitz - Kansas Expoce ntre General Manager • Justin Gregory - Kansas Expocen tre Director of Operations • Dean Ferrell - Construction Advisor
DESIGN TEAM • HTK Architects - Local Prime Architect • POPULOUS - Arena and Expo Design Expe rts • CSL- Market Feasibility and Economic Consultants • Latimer Sommers & Associates - Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing Engineers • Walter P. Moore - Structura l Engineers • Avant Acoustics - Acoustical Engineers
4 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2014 voters in Shawnee County approv ed a half-cent sales tax committee and key stakeholders . In addition to the expertise of initiative that would provide funds necessary to make various the HTK I Populous team , specific engineers were brought in improvements to facilities and infrastructures throughout Topeka to review and identify needs related to acoustics, structure and and Shawnee County . An inter-local agreement reached between mechanical/electrical systems. This survey amassed a program of the City of Topeka and Shawnee County for allocating monies over 80 projects that have been categorized and prioritized into received through the sales tax, identified the Kansas Expocentre , three distinct project packages : among others, for faci lity upgrades to address deferred maintenance and facility expansions to ensure the facility A) Landon Arena and Expo renovations and expansions continues to be a viable tool for economic development. tourism B) Multi-Purpose Equine I Livestock I Expo facility expansions and pride in Topeka and Shawnee County. C) Site renovations, expansion and development
In 2017, the team of HTK Architects and Populous were retained The result represents a balanced approach of improvements by the Shawnee County Board of Commissioners to study, at the Kansas Expocentre. One that balances overall return on identify and recommend facility improvement needs for the investment. addresses critical deferred maintenance items and Kansas Expocentre . The information herein serves as a master insures the Kansas Expocentre maintains a competiti ve position plan identifying and prioritizing key deferred maintenance , in an ever-growing market of event facilities. During the master renovation and expansion projects to the Kansas Expocentre plan process, the design team was able to listen and respond site and buildings . The program of recommended projects within with recommendations related to policy. While not representing this master plan is supported by a market analysis performed by physical capital improvements , subtle policy changes can the industry recogni zed firm of Conventions , Spo rts and Leisure help improve safety as well as overall patron experience. The Internatio nal (CSL) and based on the se key tenet s: info rmati o n contained in this master p lan provides a logical road map and schedule for implementation of improvements at the • Return on Investment (ROI) Kansas Expocentre . • Market Demand and Position • Budget • Quality of Life Improvements for Shawnee County
The master planning process included forming a Kansas Expocentre Design and Construction Advisory Committee (KEDCAC) made up of selected Shawnee County staff and representatives from the Kansas Expocentre . This committee was tasked with providing input to the design team , evaluating recommendat ions and establishing prior ities for future improvements to the Kansas Expocentre . Additionally , this committee. with assistance from the design team , was to evaluate options for project financing to determine the most responsible method to maximize the investment by taxpayers in Shawnee County faci lities.
The design team took inventory of critical deferred maintenance issues and responded to the facility needs identified by the
5 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN PROCESS
The purpose of the Kansas Expocentre Master Plan was to regiona l, and national event market. The Comm ittee and design identify facility improvement needs through engagement team scrutinized the program scenarios to ensure qua lity of with stake holders. Shawnee County staff and Expocentre life. efficiency of design, customer experience. and operat iona l management personnel. The design team made up of HTK sustainab ili ty were cons idered. The eva lu ation process realized Architects and Populous along with other specialty engineers both tangible quantifiable considerations such as economic facil itated analyzing an expansive list of potential projects of impact. anticipated return on investment. potentia l to attract deferred maintenance , renovations and expansion to the Kansas events and attendees , and reduction of operationa l costs through Expocentre campus. The design team worked closely with the modernization of utilities as well as intangib le considerations that Kansas Expocentre Design Advisory Committee (KEDCAC) are not as easi ly quan t ifiable such as impact to the quality of life throughout the process to assess needs and identify priorities . for county residents, guest experience, and community pride in Stakeholder engagement and market research was performed their local facility . by the firm of Conventions. Sports and Leisure, International , (CSL). Stakeholder engagement involved conversations with Due to the breadth of events the Kansas Expocentre hosts both current and former promoters for events at the Kansas throughout the year. flexibility of all new and remodeled Expocentre . The underlying questions for stakeho lders related spaces was paramount. This also involved the relationship and to facility capacity, quality and improvements necessary for connectivity of buildings on campus. Site development scenarios these events to stay or return to the Expocentre. The process were developed in response to the final program. Due to the also involved surveying regional events to evaluate the location of the Kansas Expocentre campus . FEMA fl oo d plain compe t it iveness of Expocentre facilities in attracting new events. maps identified parts of the site that were undevelo pable due Engagement with local stakeholders identified key community to flood ways of the Shunganunga Creek. The site plans indicate events that the Expocentre holds as w ell as t y pe and qualit y undevel o pable areas in designat ed fl oo d ways al ong th e sout h of fa cilities needed to attra ct new event s. A master list of edge of the site. over 125 projects and over $70 million w as identified from the engagement process. The design team and the KEDCAC worked Budget Note : The project budget for impro vements at the to refine the program to fit the $45 million budget w ith th e Expocentre is $45 million that w ill accumulate over 15 years as goal of achieving a balanced approach to address in g deferred part of the county w ide half-cent sales tax approved by voters maintenance, providing significant improvements to customer in 2014. Throughout the master planning process the design experience and implementing facility improvements required to team worked closely with Shawnee County finance staff to study position the Expocentre for success in the market. multiple approaches to financing the projects that maximize value to taxpayers while realizing facility improvements in the Multiple concept design options were developed to meet the near term . The chosen scenario looks to bond the project against prioritized list of projects . This allowed the team and committee the sales tax revenue. This solution will allow improvements to to understand imp lications of construct ion costs and project be completed in five years avoiding long term construct ion cost phasing . Engineering consu ltants were tasked with review of escalation and realize the immediate benef its for events and existing and proposed projects specific to structura l integrity, civi l operat ions. The cost of bond in g combined with other project site engineer in g, acoustics , aud io/ video design, and mechanical . "soft cost s" such as design and engineering fees. contractor electrica l, and p lumbing. Six detailed program scenarios were overhead and profit. furniture , fixtures, and equ ipment. developed and studied in the process of refining the program to construction contingencies , etc. are estimated around $15 million the final list of recommendations . Each scenario was composed resulting in a construction budget of around $30 million. The from the same master list of programmatic elements or projects recommended list of projects targets a construction budget of and the projects were ass igned d iffering weighted priority to $30 million and allocates a series of prior itized alternates that create unique project impl ementation scenarios that fit w ith in may fluctuate in and out of the budget as the design is refined in the construct ion budget. The scenarios were assessed by the design phase of the project. CSL to reveal their strengths and weaknesses within the local,
6 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN MARKET FEASIBILITY STUDY OVERVIEW CSL, in col laboration with the design team, conducted a S.Broader strategy must consider greater site and In terms of project benefits , the annua l operation of the market evaluation and economic assessment study for destination - Industry best practices investment Expocen tre current ly provides important quantifiable Shawnee County to help gu ide a series of renovation and strategy would include initiatives and incentives to benefits to Shawnee County and the surrounding region . expansion projects concern ing the Kansas Expocentre assist in development of a more compe lling sub Based on analysis results, an expanded/enhanced in Topeka, Kansas. The full Report and Appendix destination at Expoce ntre. Develop p lan for growth Expoce ntre project would be expected to lead to larger documents prov ide detail and supporting information in proximate v isitor amenities and encourage private quant ifiable and unquantifiable benefits for the local surrounding the research, analysis and conclusions investment. and regional area. Overal l, the analysis suggests the associated with th is study, and they should be reviewed Recommended Scenario wou ld generate estimated in their entireties to gain an understanding of the study's Analysis results suggest that market demand exists to economic impacts within Shawnee County that would be methods, limitations and impl ications. support investment in the Kansas Expocentre through a approximate ly 60 percent higher than those present ly targeted expansion and enhancement project (pursuant generated by the existing Expocentre. The goal of this study is to provide the County , KEDCAC, to the Recommended Scenario developed by the design the design team and other stakeholders the information team with co llaborat ion by the County and the KEDCAC). Lastly, excluding debt service and replacement reserve and recommendations necessary to ensure that This strategy would serve to grow and protect the funding, a Expocentre Recommended Scenario would Expoce ntre improvements conform to demand unique to Expoce ntre's long-term v iab ili ty as a productive mu lti be estimated to generate an operating deficit of the Topeka destination and provide the greatest return purpose event faci lity complex serving Topeka, Shawnee approximately $619,000 upon stabilization. This type on- investment for the Shawnee County community. County and the region . The Recommended Scenario is of operating result would be consistent within the event believed to best ba lance market suppo rtable expansion/ facility industry for comparable complexes adjusted Based on the market research and analysis comp leted, enhancement programmatic elements, while maximizing for type, size and focus, and, importantly , represents a the following key conclusions have been developed return on investment within the identified project budget. significant improvement over existing and recent year conce rning a potential expanded/e nhanced Expoce ntre . Expo centre financial operating performance. Specifically, Based on the research and analysis conducted for the compared to historical Expocentre operations 1. Embrace brand strength - Leverage and build study, key annual estimates of utilization and cost/ co nsidering the average of the past five years, operating on the core strengths of the Expocentre "brand" benefit metrics associated with an expanded / enhanced revenues and expenses are estimated to increase by 66 equestrian, agriculture. livestock, and exhibition Expoce ntre under the Recommended Scenario include and 22 percent, respective ly, resu lting in reduct ion in the cannot be "everything to everybody ". the following. Figures represent annual estimates upon annual operating deficit from $1.1 million to $620,000 . stabilization of operat ions (assumed year five), w ith 2. Equestrian/livestock market demand monetary figures presented in 2017 dollars. opportunities - Demand exists to support investment in equestrian / livestock facilities-should • 533 events remain as a key element of facility brand identity . • 758 event days • 550,300 attendee days (including 162,000 non-local 3. Opportunities to better attract and serve attendee days) entertainment demand - Arena could moderately • 31,400 hotel room nights grow events and attendance, drive new revenues, • $20 .4 million in direct spending by non -locals and enhance customer experience. However. a full • $34 .2 million in total output (direct+ indirect+ redevelopment (i.e., new arena) is not indicated. induced spending) by non-locals • $16.6 million in personal earnings generated by non 4. Major expansion of exhibit space not indicated local spending - Most event demand can be accommodated by • 427 full and part-time jobs supported by non-local existing supply-new equestrian facilities and arena spending floor space will serve as overflow. Opportunities • $369,000 in City sales tax revenue exist to attract limited new amateur sports and flat • $295,000 in County sa les and transient guest tax floor event activity. revenue
7 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN
ITEMIZED PROJECT BUDGET
Proposed Kansas ExpoCentre Renovation and Additions Program 10/13/2017
Priority category Project Type Name Notes Quantity Unit Unit Cost: Low Unit Cost: High Unit Cost : Average Total Cost low Tot al Cost High Total Cost Average
RECOMMENDED BAlANCED APPROACH PROJECTS- PRIORITY INITIAL NEED
H Expo New Project Exterior Sign age Upgrade/ Wayfinding/ Main Entry Sign Excludes possible sponsored possible signage contribution s 1 lS $100,000 $150,000 $125,000 $100,000 $150,000 $125,000 H Expo New Project Interior Paint 18,850 SF $3 $3 $3 $50,200 $56,550 $53,375 H Expo New Project Existing Toilets Renovation Refresh finishes only 865 SF $41 $71 $56 $35,200 $61,650 $48,425 H Expo New Project Upgrade Security System Video Surveillance 5 access control drs @ $3,000 ea. 55,000 SF $1 $1 $1 $37,900 $45,650 $41,775 H Expo New Project Wi-Fi 1 lS $143,000 $171,600 $157,300 $143,000 $171,600 $157,300 H Expo New Project Beer Coolers - Confirm if Food Service provider wilt pay for these 330 SF $213 $191 $202 $70,350 $63,030 $66,690 H Expo Deferred Maintenance Toilets Add fixtures required 41 we, 11 u, 13 lv, 3 df to meet modern code requirement! 2,450 SF $110 $150 $130 $269,500 $367,500 $318,500 H Expo Deferred Maintenance HVAC Rooftop Units+ Chiller Chiller serves Expo Rooftop Units 1 $945,000 $1,125,000 $1,035,000 $945,000 $1,125,000 $1,035,000 H Expo Deferred Maintenance Interior Energy Efficient lightin g lED. For noise reduction/ 138 units/13 . 7 year paybad 138 EA $591 $591 $591 $81,558 $81,558 $81,55 H Landon New Project Acoustics· Acoust ic Banners Material Cost x2 for labor Est. 2 lS $20,000 $25,000 $22,500 $40,000 $50,000 $45,000 H Landon New Project Acoustics· Acoustic Wall Treatment Replace sound panels; Materia l Cost x2 for labo r Est. 2 lS $12,000 $15,000 $13,500 $24,000 $30,000 $27,000 H Landon New Project New Pantry Add at the Main Concourse for Premium Seating Service 200 SF $23 $23 $23 $4,500 $4,500 $4,500 H Landon New Project Production Office Renovation New finishes in existing production office 600 SF $18 $18 $10,620 $10,620 H Landon New Project Sound System· Bowl 1 $350,000 $550,000 $450,000 $350,000 $550,000 $450,000 H Landon New Project Interior Paint Walls, Ceiling, St ructure 1 lS $140,000 $183,000 $161,500 $140,000 $183,000 $161,500 H Landon New Project New l ocker Rooms Additional 2 brings total count to 6 3,000 SF $150 $350 $250 $450,000 $1,050,000 $750,000 H Landon New Project New Northeast lobby Connection Northeast entry lobby, new concessions, stair, and ground level expansion space 10,975 SF $329 $495 $412 $3,611,450 $5,433,500 $4,522,475 H Landon New Project Toilet Renovation Renovation of existing restrooms • Refresh finishes only 4,326 SF $26 $38 $32 $111,400 $165,100 $138,250 H Landon New Project Center Video Board 1 EA $500,000 $650,000 $575,000 $500,000 $650,000 $575,000
H Landon New Project Concessions Re·Branding Fa~ade Changes 12 Rooms $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 H Landon New Project Concourse ADA Seating Platforms Platform buuild out to accommodate additional ADA seating POPUlOUS TO CON FIR 3,600 SF $20 $45 $33 $72,000 $162,000 $117,000 H Landon New Project Premium Seating· log e Part of concourse expansion 44 loge s $500 $750 $625 $22,000 $33,000 $27,500 H Landon New Project Premium Seating - End Zone Bar 1,341 SF $30 $50 $40 $40,230 $67,050 $53,640 H Landon Deferred Maint enance Arena Boiler Replacement 2-2000 MBH Dua l Fuel. 4-2000 MBH Gas/ $11,200 per year gas savi ngs, 98 yr. paybac 1 lS $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 H Landon Deferred Maintenance Arena Emergency Generator Replacement 500 KW - New Generator - Required for life safety 1 lS $266,000 $266,000 $266,000 $266,000 $266,000 $266,000 H Landon Deferred Maint enance ADA access Unisex toilets/ concessions counters 34" 1 lS $40,000 $88,300 $64,150 $40,000 $88,300 $64,150 H Landon Deferred M aintenance Exterior Skin Repair New metal panel rain screen system over water proof mem brane & existing pa nel! 56,000 SF $35 $55 $45 $1,960,000 $3,080,000 $2,520,000 H Landon Deferred Maint enance Interior Energy Efficient lighting- Bowl Only- Event Ughtinf Interior Energy Efficient li ghting/ Control! 1 lS $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 H Landon Deferred Maintenance Seat Replacement - lower Deck New, padded, wider, color 3,700 Seats $125 $150 $138 $462,500 $555,000 $508,750 H Landon Deferred Maint enance Seat Replacement - Upper Deck New , padded, wider, color 3,000 Seats $125 $150 $138 $375,000 $450,000 $412,500 H Landon Deferred Maintenance Upgrades to existing Elevator Upgrades finishes/ speed/Electrical to existing Elevator 1 lS $55,000 $60,500 $57,750 $55,000 $60,500 $57,750
H Landon Deferred Maintenance Toilets Add fixtures required 30 we, 3, lv, to meet modern code requirement~ 33 EA $2,000 $4,000 $3,000 $66,000 $132,000 $99,000 H Equine New Project New Covered Arena Includes 130x280 clear span arena, 30' lean to for seating or stagin@ 47,832 SF $85 $95 $90 $4,065,720 $4,544,040 $4,304,880 H Equine New Project New Stall Barn - 240 Sta lls Includes 16 wash bays, 90' central clear span w/ two 30' lean-to, rest rooms, No AC 45,500 SF $110 $130 $120 $5,005,000 $5,915,000 $5,460,000 H Equine New Project Paging/ Sound System 1 $60,000 $120,000 $90,000 $60,000 $120,000 $90,000 H Equine Deferred Maintenance Existing Covered Arena Renovation New Insulation, Add paved circulation to Domer, Enclose east side, Improve Ventilatio 29,000 SF $10 $20 $15 $290,000 $580,000 $435,000 H Equine Deferred Maintenance Domer Renovation New Insulation, remove wash bays, renovate restrooms, renovate cafe, LEO lightin£ 43,500 SF $10 $20 $15 $435,000 $870,000 $652,500 H Equine Deferred Maint enance Existing St all Barn Renovation New Insu lation, Asp halt Floor, New Wash Bays, New Ramp, Renovate Restroom and S 43,500 SF $15 $30 $23 $652,500 $1,305,000 $978,750 H Equine Deferred Maintenance Arena/Stall Bar West Foundation Wall Waterproofing & Drainage Required to sto p water infiltration damaging structural steel. 1 lS $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 H Equine Deferred Maint enance Structural Steel Repair Repair water damage to columns 28 EA $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $84,000 $84,000 $84,000 H Equine Deferred Maintenance Upgrade Securjty System Video Surveillance 3 access control drs @ $3,000 ea. 65,000 SF $1 $1 $1 $36,100 $39,650 $37,875
H Site New Project Security Fencing and Gates & Bollards Fencing is 1180 LF @$52.00/ LF, 50 Bollards@ $1,000 Eac~ 1 lS $113,600 $113,600 $113,600 $113,600 $113,600 $113,600 H Site Deferred Maintenance Demo Vehicular Ticketing Kiosks/ Replace Paving 8 EA $2,000 $4,000 $3,000 $16,000 $32,000 $24,000 H Site Deferred Maint enance Concrete curb & gutter removal 13,900 LF $8 $8 $8 $111,200 $111,200 $111,200 H Site Deferred Maintenance Concrete sidewalk removal 5,279 SY $8 $8 $8 $42,232 $42,232 $42,232 H Site Deferred Maintenance Concrete pavement removal 580 SY $8 $8 $8 $4,640 $4,640 $4,640 H Site Deferred Maintenance Adjust existing manhole 6 EA $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 H Site Deferred Maintenance Remove existing RV electrical hookups 19 EA $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $19,000 $19,000 $19,000 H Site Deferred Maintenance Remove and Reset existing light poles 25 EA $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $37,500 $37,500 $37,501: H Site Deferred Maintenance large t ree removal 7 EA $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 H Site Deferred Maintenance Cold milling of asphak - 2" 6,140 SY $3 $3 $3 $18,420 $18,420 $18,420 H Site Deferred Maint enance 2.1/4" asphalt surface 6,140 SY $10 $10 $10 $61,400 $61,400 $61,400 H Site Deferred Maintenance 6" asphalt parking lots 11340 SY $36 $36 $36 $408,240 $408,240 $408,24ll H Site Deferred Maintenance Curb inlet 23 EA $4,500 $4,500 $4,500 $103,500 $103,500 $103,500 H Site Deferred Maintenance 4" concret e sidewalks 20,000 SF $5 ss $5 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 H Sit e Deferred Maintenance Combined curb 7 gutte r - type i 13,000 LF $32 $32 $32 $416,000 $416,000 $416,000 H Site Deferred M aintenance Combined curb & gutter - type 2 1,500 LF $28 $28 $28 $42,000 $42,000 $42,000 H Site Deferred Maintenance Pavement Markings 5660 LF $4 $4 $4 $22,640 $22,640 $22,640 H Site Deferred Maintenance Parking wheel stops 26 EA $50 $50 $50 $1,300 $1,300 $1,300 H Site Deferred Maintenance Secu rity ba rrie r fencing 1,300 LF $35 $35 $35 $45,500 $45,500 $45,500 H Site Deferred M aintenance RV hookups Proposed Addition of 56 RV spaces w/ Back to Back Pedestals 30 EA $3,500 $5,000 $4,250 $105,000 $150,000 $127,500 H Sit e Deferred Maintenance Gates- 30' 2 EA $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 H Site Deferred Maintenance Storm sewer pipe replacement 4,500 LF $150 $150 $150 $675,000 $675,000 $675,000 H Site Deferred Maintenance Earthwork 1 lS $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 H Site Deferred Maintenance l andscaping 1 lS $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 H Site Deferred Maintenance Parking l ot lig hting Replacement Paint poles, new fixtures - 16 yr payback 78 EA $1,060 $1,060 $1,060 $82,680 $82,680 $82,680 H Expo New Project Point of Sale Upgrade Concessions, Portables 2 Unit $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 H Landon New Project Existing l ocker Room Renovation New finishes in existing 4 Rooms 2,300 SF $81 $91 $86 $185,300 $210,000 $197,650 H Landon New Project Concessions Equipm ent Upgrade New Equipment to diversify menu. {What ca n the food service provider do?) 12 Rooms $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 H Landon New Project Guest/Perform ers lounge Renovation Upgrade in finishes at existing Guest perfor mer dressing rooms 4 Rooms $2,500 $7,500 $5,000 $10,000 $30,000 $20,000 H Landon Deferred Maintenance Interior Energy Efficient lighti ng- Non-Bowl On!~ Interior Energy Efficient lighting/ Controls 80,000 SF $4 $6 $5 $320,000 $480,000 $400,000 RECOMMENDED BAlANCED APPROACH PROJECTS- PRIORITY INITIAL NEED --- $30,311,265 NOTE: This opinio n of probab le construction cost is made on the basis of Architect's experience and qualifications and represents t he Arc hitect's best judgment as an experi enced and qualified professional generally familiar with the industry. However. since the A rchitect has no contro l over the cost of labor. materials. equipment . or services furnished by others , or over the Contractor's methods of dete rm ining prices. or over competit ive bidding or market conditions . the A rchitec t can not and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from op inions of probab le construction cost as provided. If the Ow ner wishes g rea ter assurance as to probab le construc ti on costs. Owne r shall emp loy an independent cost estimato r or contracto r. 117 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE MASTER PLAN ITEMIZED PROJECT BUDGET •
Proposed Kansas ExpoCentre Renovation and Additions Program- Priority category Project Type Name Notes Qu antity Unit Unit Cost: low Unit Cost : High Unit Cost: Average Total Cost low Total Cost High Total Cost Average
ADDITIONAL UNMET NEED - Recomm ended Initial Add Alt ernat es
A01 t.ndon New ProJect LED Si&nall!/Ribbon Board 380 LF SPECTRAPRIORnY ALT. 1 2 $225,000 $300,000 $262,500 $450,000 $600,000 $525,000 A02 Landon New Project Wi-Fi prioritize sub group (SPECTRA PRIORITY ALT. 2) 120,000 SF $3 $3 $3 $312,000 $358,800 $335,400 A03 t.ndon New Project Acoustics · Upper Deck Masking CUrtains House reduction oortain; Material Cost x2 for t.bor Est. (SPECTRA PRIORnY AlT. 3) 2 lS $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 A04 Equine New Project W i-Fi 65,000 SF $3 $3 $3 $169,000 $185,900 $177,450 A05 :EQuine NewPrl)ject Covered Connector - Domer to New Arena 3,830 SF $45 $65 $55 $172,350 $248,950 $210,650 A06 Equine New Project Covered Connector - Domer to New Sta ll Barn 1,588 SF $45 $65 $55 $71,460 $103,220 $87,340 A07 Equine New Project Covered Connector - Domer to Landon 4,955 SF $45 $85 $65 $222,975 $421,175 $322,075 A08 Expo Defered Maintena nce Repair Power Boxes Deteriorated recessed floor boxes containing power, water, electrica l. and commu nicati 28 $1,304 S1 ,554 $1,429 $36,500 $43,500 $40,000 A09 t.ndon NewPrl)ject Sound Svstem - Concou...,/Sultes/Pub lic Entries 1 $50,000 $100,000 $75,000 $50,000 $100,000 $75,000 A10 Landon Deferred Main tenance Replace Power Boxes Deteriorated recessed floor boxes containing power, water, electrical, and communicati 8 $7,125 $7,838 $7,482 $57,000 $62,704 $59,852 A11 Equine New Project Hay/ Shavings Storage and Concession 800 SF $65 $110 $88 $52,000 $88,000 $70,000 A12 Equine New Project Dirt Storage 7,200 SF $45 $85 $65 $324,000 $612,000 $468,000 A13 IExJx> New Project Video Display 20' X35' 1 lS $250,000 $500,000 $375,000 $250,000 $500,000 $375,000
ADDITIONAL UN MET NEED - Recomme nded Initial Add Alternates S2,795,767
UN MET NEED- NOT INCLUDED
M1 Lando n New Project Upgrade Security System 1 LS $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 M2 Landon New Project Broadcast Hea dend and Infrastructur e Confirm need 1 $120,000 $200,000 $160,000 $120,000 $200,000 S160,000
M3 Expo New Pro·ect Sound System 1 ~5000 0 ~150000 ~100000 50 000 $150 000 ~100000 M4 Landon New Project Storage Can expand across drive (Covered in either the Landon East concourse or Equine exist in 5,000 SF $100 $350 $225 $500,000 $1,750,000 $1,125,000 M5 Expo New Project Freight Elevat or Enlargement Replace 1 Exist w/ 5,000 lb, 100 fMP & elect. Upsize 1 $189,500 $220,000 $204,750 $189,500 $220,000 $204,750
M6 Landon New Project Oi~italS i nap,e/Supplementary Display Syst em Concourse/Suites/Public Entries 1 $100,000 $150,000 $125,000 $100,000 $150,000 S125,000 M7 Lando n New Project End Video Display (2 ) 2 EA $300,000 $500,000 $400,000 $600,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 M8 Landon New Project New South East Entry Southeast ent ry lobby (no new concessions) stair and ground level expansion space etc. 11732 SF $303 $469 $386 $3,556,075 $5,499,2 50 S4,527,663 u Expo New Project Exterior Skin Repai r eXpo 17,700 SF $35 $55 $45 $619,500 $973,500 $796,500 u Site New Project Parking lot Wi·Fi so so so so so so l3 Expo New Project Breakout Rooms (green rooms) 5 to 6, 25 to 50 people (only if recouped from other space) 4 Rooms $10,000 $25,000 $17,500 $40,000 $100,000 S70,000 L4 Expo New Project Acoustical Wall Treatment Mat erial Only 1 $100,000 $125,000 $112,500 $100,000 $125,000 $112,500 l5 Landon New Project House AV · Define W hat this Is Better REVIEW W/ AV CONSULTANT so so so so so so • L6 Expo New Project Admin Office l ocation move if part of a renovat ion for hospit ality. Otherwi se low to re novat e in place 4,900 $125 $250 $188 $612,500 $1,225,000 S918,750 L7 Landon New Project Premium Seating· Suites 3 Suites $35,000 $65,000 $50,000 $105,000 $195,000 S150,000 l8 Landon Deferred M aintenance Arena Roof Replacement No new insulation vs new 78,400 SF $8 $13 $10 $604,600 $1,035,800 $820,200 l9 Site New Project Upgrade Security System Site wide to match Landon and Expo, RV security, add security cameras to light poles, safety/security/traffic so so so so so so uo Landon Deferred Maintenance Ice maintain only I so so so so $0 so U1 Lan don New Proj ect Concourse· East & South· Expansion Spaces@ Ground leve l This is ON LY expansion space t hat could be used for locker room expansion or st orage· 4 9,363 I SF $125 $300 $213 $1,170,375 $2,808,900 $1,989,638 U2 Landon New Proj ect Co ncourse · East & South • Entry & Concourse Includes both entries and bot h concourses, adds concessions and concourse· Cadillac od 24,870 SF $350 $500 $425 $8,704,500 $12,435,000 $10,569,750
UN MET NEED- NOT INCLUDED $22,669,750
UN MET NEED- NOT FUNDED: Anticipate d as FUTURE CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CIP1 Site New Project Upgrade Security Syst em Site wide RV sec urity, add security cameras to light poles, safety/security/ tr affic s s s CIP2 S~e Deferred M aintena nce Bird Screen Soffit of West side of Arena and Expo Hall s s s CIP3 Sit e Deferred Maintenance Gazebo Roof and Railing Repair s s s CIP4 S~e Deferred Maintenance Truck, Uniloader, Tractor, lift, 4W D Ve hicle replacement Not part of proj ect or budget $ ------s s NOTE: Th is opinion of probab le construction cost is made on the basis of Architect's experience and qualifications and represents the Architect's best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional generally familiar with the industry. However, since the Architect has no control over the cost of labor. materials, equipment. or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. the Architect cannot and does not guarantee that proposals. bids, or actual construction cost will not va ry from opinions of probable construction cost as provided. If the Owner wishes greater assurance as to probable construction costs. Owner shall employ an independent cost estimator or contractor.
t
118 KA NSAS EXPOCENTRE MASTE R PLAN ·Estimated Annual Attendee Days Stabilized Year of Operations
RECOMMENDED SCENARIO 1: SCENARIO 2: SCENARIO 3: SCENARIO: Deferred Equine Arena Event Type Balanced Maintenance Emphasis Emphasis
Equestrian/Livestock/Animal 97,445 42,226 112,210 44,175 Am Sports 54,134 36,089 36 ,089 54 ,134 Community Ice 10,099 10,473 10,473 9,351 Minor League Sports Tenant 54,000 30,000 30,000 80,000 Tradeshow/Consumer Show 54,965 49,076 58,891 55,791 Meetings/Banquets/Receptions 81,850 74,409 74,409 84,330 Fairs/Festivals 66,238 54,592 81,888 59,141 Entertainment/Promoter Show 123,078 76,085 76,085 161 '120 Other 8.489 796 8.489 5,730
Total 550,297 373,745 488,532 553,772
-• ARCH I TEC T ::=: POPULous · Economic Impact Concepts
• Direct Spending consists principally of initial purchases made by attendees at an event who do not reside in the local area. This spending typically takes place in local hotels, restaurants, retail establishments and other such businesses. An example of direct spending is when an out-of-town event attendee pays a local hotel for overnight lodging accommodations.
• Indirect Spending consists of there-spending of the initial or direct expenditures. An example of indirect spending is when a restaurant purchases additional food and dining supplies as a result of new dining expenditures through increased patronage. A certain portion of these incremental supply expenditures occurs within the local community (i.e., "indirect spending," the type of which is quantified under this analysis), while another portion leaves the local economy (i.e., "leakage").
• Induced Spending consists of the positive changes in employment, earnings and tax collections generated by changes in population associated with direcUindirectexpenditures.
• Total Output represents the total direct, indirect and induced spending effects generated by the project. This calculation measures the total dollar change in output that occurs in the local economy for1 each dollar of output delivered to final demand.
• Earnings (or Personal Income) represents the wages and salaries earned by employees of businesses associated with or impacted by the project. In other words, the multiplier measures the total dollar change in earnings of households employed by the affected industries for each additional dollar of output delivered to final demand.
• Employment represents the number of full- and part-time jobs. The employment multiplier measures the total change in the number of jobs in the local economy (throughout a wide diversity of industry sectors) for each additional $1.0 million of output delivered to final demand. -• A RC H I TEC T :: POPULOUS " I~
,: Est. Annual Non-Local Attendee Days Attendees that do not reside in Shawnee County, Stabilized Year of Operations
RECOMMENDED I SCENARIO 1: SCENARIO 2: SCENARIO 3: SCENARIO: Deferred Equine Arena Event Type Balanced Maintenance Emphasis Emphasis
Equestrian/Livestock/Animal 48,723 21 '113 56,105 22,088 Am Sports 27,067 18,045 18,045 27,067 Community Ice 1,010 1,047 1,047 935 Minor League Sports Tenant 8,100 4,500 4,500 12,000 Tradeshow/Consumer Show 16,489 14,723 17,667 16,737 Meetings/Banquets/Receptions 12,277 11 '161 11,161 12,649 Fairs/Festivals 19,871 16,378 24,566 17,742 EntertainmenUPromoter Show 24,616 15,217 15,217 32,224
Other 3,396 318 3,396 ~292
Total 161,549 102,502 151,704 143,735
"""""""'~POPULOUS. Est. Annual Hotel Room Nights In Shawnee County, Stabilized Year of Operations
RECOMMENDED SCENARIO 1: SCENARIO 2: SCENARIO 3: SCENARIO: Deferred Equine Arena
Event Type Balanced i Maintenance Emphasis Emphasis
Equestrian/Livestock/Animal I 17,053 7,390 19,637 7,731
Am Sports I 6,316 i 4,210 4,210 6,316
Community Ice I 34 35 35 31 Minor League Sports Tenant 324 180 180 480 Fairs/Festivals 2,385 1,965 2,948 2,129 EntertainmenUPromoter Show 1,969 1,217 1,217 2,578 Other 679 64 679 458 EntertainmenUPromoter Show 1,969 1,217 1,217 2,578 Other 679 64 679 458
Total 31,407 16,342 30,803 22,759
-• A RCH I TEC T ::: POPULOUS '
.: Estimated Annual Direct Spending In Shawnee County, Stabilized Year of Operations, 2017$
RECOMMENDED SCENARIO 1: SCENARIO 2: SCENARIO 3: SCENARIO: Deferred Equine Arena Event Type Balanced Maintenance Emphasis Emphasis
Equestrian/Livestock/Animal $8,282,840 $3,589,231 $9,537,815 $3,754,887 Am Sports 3,383,357 2,255,571 2,255,571 3,383,357 Community Ice 100,987 104,727 104,727 93,507 Minor League Sports Tenant 688,500 382,500 382,500 1,020,000 Tradeshow/Consumer Show 1,978,730 1,766,724 2,120,068 2,008,486 Meetings/Banquets/Receptions 1,596,066 1,450,969 1,450,969 1,644,431 Fairs/Festivals 1,788,425 1,473,977 2,210,965 1,596,808 EntertainmenUPromoter Show 2,215,402 1,369,521 1,369,521 2,900,163 Other 407,464 38.200 407,464 275,038
Total $20,441 '771 $12,431,419 $19,839,601 $16,676,677
-• A RC HITEC T ::: POPULOUS ' .. [!I !'!!'!:'!!:!:!!~~~! Estimated Annual Economic Impacts In Shawnee County, Stabilized Year of Operations, 2017$
RECOMMENDED SCENARIO 1: SCENARIO 2: SCENARIO 3: SCENARIO: Deferred Equine Arena Balanced Maintenance Emphasis Emphasis
Total Hotel Room Nights 31 ,407 16,342 30,803 22,759
Direct Spending
Hotel $2,453,012 I $1,491 ,770 $2,380,752 $2,001 ,201 RestaurantMeals 11,856,227 7,210,223 11,506,969 9,672,473 Entertainment/Leisure 1,022,089 621,571 991,980 833,834 Retail/Shopping 3,883,936 2,361,970 3,769,524 3,168,569
Other 1,226, 506 I 745,885 1 '190,376 1,000,601 Total $20,441,771 $12,431 ,419 $19,839,601 $16,676,677
Indirect/Induced Spending $13,757,312 $8,366,345 $13,352,052 $11 ,223,404
Total Output $34,199,083 $20,797,765 $33,191 ,653 $27,900,081
Personal Earnings $16,557,834 $10,069,450 $16,070,077 $13,508,108
Employment (full & part-time jobs) 427 259 414 348
City Sales Tax $368,534 $224,120 $357,678 $300,655 County Transient Guest Tax $171 ,711 $104,424 $166,653 $140,084 County Sales Tax $122,845 $74,707 $119,226 $100,218
~ '"""''"0'~POPULOUS ' . ' •
Financial Operations Estimated Annual, Stabilized Year of Operations, 2017$, excluding debt service
RECOMMENDED SCENARIO 1: SCENARIO 2: SCENARIO 3: SCENARIO: Deferred Equine Arena Balanced Maintenance Emphasis Emphasis
Operating Revenues: Facility rent $1,987,000 $1,405,000 $1,794,000 $2,155,000 Food service (net) 496,000 347,000 478,000 560,000 Contract service/other 298 000 155 000 257,000 370 000 Total Operating Revenues $2,781 ,000 $1 ,907,000 $2,529,000 $3,085,000
Operating Expenses: Salaries and benefits $1,780,000 $1,550,000 $1,706,000 $1,831,000 -; •wr. Contract labor 205,000 180,000 210,000 200,000 Utilities 786,000 600,000 712,000 752,000 Repair & maintenance 195,000 120,000 174,000 168,000 General & administrative 110,000 75,000 105,000 115,000 Supplies 149,000 110,000 165,000 160,000 Insurance 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Other 25 000 10 000 15 000 25 000 Total Operating Expenses $3,400,000 $2,795,000 $3,237,000 $3,401,000
Net Operating Deficit ($619,000) ($888,000) ($708,000) ($316,000)
t """"'H"'~POPULOUS ' . Conditions and Limitations -ro +-Jc (]) Vl +-J ro 0 Vl The analysis presented in this report is based on estimates, assumptions and other information developed from industry research, data Cl.. c provided by the study's stakeholders, surveys of potential Kansas Expocentre users and local representatives, discussions with industry (]) ro ""'0~ participants and analysis of competitive/comparable facilities and communities. The sources of information, the methods employed, and the basis of significant estimates and assumptions are stated in this report. Some assumptions inevitably will not materialize and ::J ro" '-.. ~ <.9 ~ ~ unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Therefore, actual results achieved will vary from those described and the variations 0 Q) ,..., +-JQ.. L.L.. may be material. 0 1: I- The findings presented herein are based on analysis of present and near-term conditions in Shawnee County and Topeka, as well as (]) c 0 E ·- existing interest levels by the potential base of users of an expanded/enhanced Kansas Expocentre. Any significant future changes in the
Vl !.....Q) characteristics of the local community, such as growth in population, corporate inventory, competitive inventory and visitor (]) +-J s Vl c amenities/attractions, could materially impact the key market conclusions developed as a part of this study. As in all studies of this type, Q) the estimated results are based on competent and efficient management of the subject facility complex and assume that no significant Vl u u.. , <( 0 changes in the demand markets or assumed immediate and local area market conditions will occur beyond those set forth in this report. u 0.. 0 Furthermore, all information provided to us by others was not audited or verified and was assumed to be correct.
E ~ ... 0 Vl This document and accompanying summary report has been prepared for the internal use the Design Team and Shawnee County, and c0 roVl '"\JI should not be relied upon by any other party. The report and this supporting information has been structured to assist stakeholders in u UJ roc z evaluating market demand, supportable program and the potential cost/benefit characteristics of a potential expanded/enhanced Kansas ""'0~ Expocentre and should not be used for any other purpose. ro..cc Q) 0 c +-J - ~ B 1- ro t3 - ::J c ~ -ro Q) L.....J UJ> EQ) Z +-J u (]) c 0 58 ~ ~ ~ C5 u -• A RC H I TEC T ,::: POPULous · i Market Conclusions
1. Embrace Brand Strength: Leverage and build on the core strengths of the Expocentre "brand"-equestrian, ag, livestock, exhibition-cannot be everything to everybody. 2. Equestrian/Livestock Market Demand Opportunities: Demand exists to support investment in equestrian/livestock facilities-should remain as a key element of facility brand identity. 3. Opportunities to Better Attract & Serve Entertainment Demand: An improved Landon Arena could moderately grow events and attendance, drive new revenues, enhance customer experience. However, a full redevelopment (i.e. , new arena) is not indicated. 4. Major Expansion of Exhibit Space Not Indicated: Most event demand can be accommodated by existing supply-new equestrian facilities + arena floor space will serve as overflow. Opportunities exist to attract limited new amateur sports and flat-floor event activity. 5. Broader Strategy Must Consider Greater Site & Destination: Industry best practices investment strategy would include initiatives and incentives to assist in development of a more compelling sub-destination at Expocentre. Develop plan for growth in proximate visitor amenities and encourage private investment in.
-• j ARCH I TEC T ::: POPULOUS ' Supportable Building Program -ro c V) +-'Q) Vl I- ,.... ro J a..o V) '-' • Supportable Equestrian/Livestock Facility Program: Q) ~ ""0~ • One additional covered/enclosed show arena :J ... .,.,- (.!) ~ "-&.. • Increase total stalling capacity to 400-500 stalls at capacity 0 Q) +-' c.. z 0 • Additional 50-80 RV hook-ups c 1- .,.,- Q) c "-&.. E ·- • Add/improve connectivity among existing facilities Vl Q) Vl !.... 0 Q) +-' • Supportable Arena Facility Program: Vl Q)c z <( u • Renovation and improvement of existing Landon Arena u g_ <:( • Enhance customer experience -offer greater comfort and/or new hospitality 0E~ V) ~ . . c ro 0 V) or prem1um expenence u c LU ro LU ""0 ~ ,....,.,.. • Maintain existing capacity or modest reduction in capacity to strive for state c Q) L...... l ro..c of-the-industry amenities and customer experience c +-' 0 0 1- • New scoreboard, updated/new locker rooms (four total available), upgraded ·~~ LU ro +-' :J c '-~ sound system, food and beverage offerings, possible premium seating -ro Q) ~ > E ,...,- LU Q) L..L.. • Supportable Exhibition Space Program: +-' u Q) c <:( ~ ro • Current space levels sufficient 46 ~ ..c ~ ~ ~ -=:::::::
A"""'""'~POPULOUS. ~
"" Identified Master Plan Scenarios
• Recommended Scenario: Balanced Approach (deferred maintenance+ equine & arena balance, former Scenario 4) • Original Scenario 1: Deferred Maintenance Only (base case scenario) • Original Scenario 2: Equine Emphasis (deferred maintenance+ equine) • Original Scenario 3: Arena Emphasis (deferred maintenance+ Landon Arena) -• A RCH ITEC T ::: POPULOUS ' Estimated Annual Number of Events Stabilized Year of Operations
RECOMMENDED SCENARIO 1: SCENARIO 2: SCENARIO 3: SCENARIO: Deferred Equine Arena Event Type Balanced Maintenance Emphasis Emphasis
Equestrian/Livestock/Animal 90 65 95 68 Am Sports 12 8 8 12 Community Ice 135 140 140 125 Minor League Sports Tenant 30 30 30 40 Tradeshow/Consumer Show 28 25 30 27 Meeti ngs/Ba nq uets/Receptions 165 150 150 170 Fairs/Festivals 28 25 30 25 EntertainmenUPromoter Show 25 17 17 30 Other 20 15 20 18
Total 533 475 520 515
-• ARCH I TEC T ::: POPULOUS ' Estimated Annual Event Days Stabilized Year of Operations
RECOMMENDED SCENARIO 1: SCENARIO 2: SCENARIO 3: SCENARIO: Deferred Equine Arena Event Type Balanced Maintenance Emphasis Emphasis
Equestrian/Livestock/Animal 177 128 187 134 Am Sports 28 19 19 28 Community Ice 144 150 150 134 Minor League Sports Tenant 30 30 30 40 Tradeshow/Consumer Show 58 52 62 56 Meeti ngs/Ba nq uets/Receptions 182 165 165 187 Fairs/Festivals 51 45 55 45 Entertainment/Promoter Show 45 30 30 54 Other 42 32 42 38
Total 758 651 740 717
-• A R cH . T E c T :=::POPULous · Estimated Average Attendees Per Day Stabilized Year of Operations
RECOMMENDED SCENARIO 1: SCENARIO 2: SCENARIO 3: SCENARIO: Deferred Equine Arena I
EventT:t~e I Balanced Maintenance Em~hasis Em~hasis I I Equestrian/Livestock/Animal I 550 330 600 330 I Am Sports I 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 I Community Ice I 70 70 70 70 Minor League Sports Tenant 1,800 1,000 1,000 2,000 Tradeshow/Consumer Show 950 950 950 1,000 Meeti ngs/Ba nq uets/Receptions 450 450 450 450 Fairs/Festivals 1,300 1,200 1,500 1,300 Entertainment/Promoter Show 2,750 2,500 2,500 3,000 Other 200 25 200 150
-• A RCH I TEC T ::: POPULOUS '
... Comparable Arena Facilities Case Studies
FACILITY: FORD CENTER EVANSVILLE
City, State: Evansville, IN
Owner: City of Evansville Operator: VenuWorks
Key Facility Capacities- Components: Hockey: 9,000 Center-Stage Event: 11,000
16 suites with avg. annual cost of $55,000 per suite 95 loge boxes with avg. annual cost of $2,000 each 500 club seats with avg. annual cost of $500 per suite
Tenants: University of Evansville Basketbaii(NCAA) ECHL
Development: Opened in 2011 $127.5 million construction cost, 100% publicly funded Since its opening, private investment in downtown Evansville has grown including a $71M 245-room Hilton Doubletree, three large companies relocating/expanding headquarters in downtown and current talks of a new $69.5M Indiana University Medical School Campus
Tenants: Hosted approximately 107 events with total attendance of 441,300 in their mos-. recent year ARCH I TEC T ::: POPULOUS ' ~ Comparable Arena Facilities Case Studies
FACILITY: BON SECOURSWELLNESS ARENA
City, State: Greenville, SC Owner: Greenville Arena District WEllNESSA RENA Operator: Greenville Arena District Key Facility Capacities: Components: Hockey -13,707 Basketball - 14,897 End-Stage Event- 14,000 Center-Stage Event -15,951
Feature 30 suites with avg. selling price of $65,000 per suite and 1,000 club seats with an avg. selling price of $400 per seat
Tenants : Greenville Road Warriors (ECHL) 2,721 city-owned parking spaces within quarter mile of arena Development: Opened in 1998 at cost of $68 million $13.1 million, three year renovation began in 2013 First phase of renovations included new curtain system, a 360 degree ribbon board, HD video score board, digital menu boards, concourse signage, parking lot upgrades and new risers. Second phase began in 2014 and included improvements to the outdoor marquees, concourse and ticket office upgrades and back stage renovations
Notes: Hosted nearly 100 events with more than approximately
385,000 attendees in a recent yea~foperations •
ARCH I TECT ::: POPULous · ~ Comparable Arena Facilities Case Studies
FACILITY: PINNACLE BANK ARENA City, State: Lincoln, Nebraska Owner: City of Lincoln Operator: SMG Key Facility Capacity- Components: Hockey: 12,700 Basketball : 15,147 End-Stage Event: 14,620 Center-Stage Event: 15,900
36 suites with avg. cost of $55,000 per suite 20 loge boxes with avg. annual cost of $20,000 800 club seats with avg. cost of $750 per seat
Tenant: University of Nebraska Cornhuskers Basketball (NCAA)
Development: Opened in September 2013, at a total cost of $173 million 58 percent was publicly funded, the remaining 42 came from private investment funding
Notes: Hosted approximately 209 events with total attendance of 685,200 in the most recent year of operations
AOO"OHO>~POPULOUS. Comparable Arena Facilities -ro ...... c Event Activity Summary OJ V) ...... ,ro 0 V) 0... c OJ ro Tenant Family/ Non-Tenant Community/ Total Total ""'C~ Facility City, State Sports Concerts Ice Shows Sports Religious Other Events Attendance ::l ro... V) l9 .:::t::. - Pinnacle Bank Arena Lincoln, NE 39 17 2 25 71 55 209 685,200 ...... ,0 C..OJ '-' I '"' BOK Center Tulsa, OK 57 23 16 22 45 9 172 675,686 ...... 0 '- c 1- ~ North Charleston Coliseum N. Charleston, SC 38 50 19 OJ c ...... 0 0 24 131 334,305 Intrust Bank Arena Wichita, KS 36 VlE ·-(]) <( 13 17 8 39 3 116 297,647 Vl l.... Santander Arena Reading, PA 40 9 6 15 19 23 112 326,127 VlOJ +-'c z Vl (]) Ford Center Evansville Evansville, IN 0 20 7 72 5 0 107 441,251 <( g <( u c.. Denny Sanford Premier Center Sioux Falls, SO 33 12 11 17 10 20 103 383,300 Verizon Wireless Arena Manchester, NH 42 14 17 5 11 E ~ LU 12 101 357,881 0 V) Arena at Gwinnett Center Duluth, GA c ro 1 45 17 3 6 21 8 100 826,289 0 Vl ...... u c ,..,.... Bon Secours Wellness Arena Greenville, SC 38 16 23 7 4 11 99 384,521 w ro L.L.I ""'C ~ Average 37 19 12 18 23 16 125 471,221 c (]) <( ro ..c ,.,., KSE - Landon Arena Topeka, KS c +-' L.L.. 18 4 1 33 64 7 127 92,154 0 0 +-' ·-...... Vl ~ ::lro +-'c CL -ro (]) w> E(]) ~ ...... u OJ c 0 38 ~ ~ ~~ u Note: Kansas Expocentre- Landon Arena activity represents only those events utilizing Landon Arena. Source: Facility Management
••o"'"o'~POPULOus ·. Market Surveys & Interviews
• Site visit and tours • In-person interviews of local groups and individuals • Follow-up telephone interviews • Surveys with Current and Past Users (20 interviews representing 40+ events) • Surveys with Potential Event Planners: (70+ interviews representing over 500+ events)
1 . Livestock/Equestrian event promoters - Representing over 100 events
2. Touring Entertainment event promoters- Representing over 50 events
3. Tradeshows/Fiat Floor events -Representing over 50 events
4. Amateur Sports event organizers- Representing over 100 events/tournaments
-• ARCH I TEC T ::: POPULOUS ' (/) g:l :l Q. 0 Q. •Ill ~ > u w >- I u ~ <
V) $ ·-Q) '--> Q) ...... , "'0 ...... ,Q) c u ...... ,ro - c 0 u V) V') >§ ·- Q) ~ > .~ '--- c ro :::J ~ Vlo Surveys & Interviews 1) Entertainment Events
• Adequate seating capacity; spectator experience lacking • Limited destination appeal of area surrounding Expocentre • Arena, theater and amphitheater competition in drivable region • Significant competition for entertainment dollars from Kansas City, Lawrence, etc. • New management approach could be leveraged in near-term • Motor sports events demand remains strong • Evel Knievel Museum presents unique opportunity • Minor league hockey league challenged to gather adequate following • Drawing potential for spectator, entertainment, sports and other such events limited more by market constraints than by facility offerings
-• A RCH I T Ec T ::: POPULOUS ' Surveys & Interviews -ro t: V) 2) Agriculture/Equestrian/Livestock Events Q) - +-' Vl I 1'\. o ro vI 0.. V') '- OJ ~ '"'i • Moderate to strong demand among state and regional events ""'C ::::=:::: __, ::J ... <( l9~ • Appealing geographic location 0 Q) +-' c.. z 0 t: ..... <( • Topeka's destination cost structure (per diem) a competitive advantage Q) c E ·- V) !....QJ 0 Q) +-' • Additional stalls and covered/enclosed show ring would expand potential V) QJc z market reach <( u u 8_ <( • Need to enhance grounds security to attract high-profile events 0E~ V') ~ c ro 0 V') u c UJ • Dynamic pricing model (accounting for F&B spend, economic impact, etc.) LU ro ""'C ::::=:::: ~ c QJ L-J • Additional space for trailer marshalling ro..r:::. c +-' 1- 0 0 • Significant growth potential within market segment ·-+-' +-'V') UJ ro +-' ::J c '-~ -ro QJ ~ • Further analysis necessary to measure effective impact of additional activity LU> EQJ """'~ +-' u Q) c <( ~ ro 4 2 ~ ..r:::. -=::::::: ~ ~ tr:::::. -• A RCH I T ECT =:: POPULous · I I \
\ Surveys & Interviews 3) Tradeshow/Exhibition Events
• Moderate demand among state and regional public/consumer show promoters; limited demand among tradeshow promoters • Lack of hotel room support limits convention and tradeshow demand • Significant competition from Kansas City and Wichita • Preference for contiguous, column-free exhibit space • Concerns expressed regarding affordability of event space at Expocentre • Greatest opportunity lies with events looking to leverage destination appeal and infrastructure surrounding event facility • Outdoor events and festivals present an opportunity for growth
-• A R CH I TEC T ,::: POPULous · f
I
- Surveys & Interviews cro (./) Q) - 4) Amateur Sports & Other Events +-' 1.1) I I'\. 0 ro VI Cl. I./) '- OJ ~ ...... -; ""'0 ~ ___, • Moderate to strong demand noted among volleyball, wrestling, martial ::; ... <( (.9~ arts tournaments and competitions 0 Q) +-' c.. z 0 c I- <( • Basketball youth tournaments likely to remain in Lawrence/Kansas City Q) c E ·- 1./)I./) Q)lo... 0 • Opportunity to regularly host NAIA basketball (M/W) and wrestling events Q) +-' I./) Q)c z with improvements to Landon Arena <:( u u g_ <( • Event organizers expressed concerns with safety of grounds 0E~ I./) ~ c ro 0 I./) • Need for additional food offerings surrounding Expocentre u c w ro UJ ""'0 ~ ~ c Q) L..J • Preference is for all courts in one location; however, many events able to ro..c c +-' L_ be accommodated utilizing multiple facilities throughout the destination 0 0 r- ·-+-' +JI./) UJ ro +J ::; c '-..~ • Not ideally positioned as a community ice garden ro OJ ~ LU> Q)E """"~ +-' u Q) c <( ~ ro 44 ~ ..c c:::::::: ~~ ~
'"""''""'~POPULOUS. )> o_
OJ< ::J n ::J-· (1Q Vl r-+ OJ r-+ro I 0 7' r-+ :::::r ro -I -I Q) ..c ~ ~ 0 I Q) ~ro ~ V) tlO c ·-u c ro -c> <( )> c.. < OJ ::J n ::J-· CJQ (/) ,-+ OJ ,-+ ro I 0 I" ,-+ :::::r ro -I Comparable Expo Facility Analysis -ro 1: • • • • • - • • Q) Vl +-~ ro ~ Vl Total Largest a; ~ Ownership Size Horse RV Arena
~ ~...V) Facility Location Structure (acres) Stalls Hookups Seating l9 ~ - Expo Square Tulsa, OK County 240 2,500 333 4,500 +J0 a.QJ '"\JJ Kentucky Exposition Center LouisvHie, KY State 400 2,498 218 19,000 +J 0 c I- '- Georgia National Fairgrounds Perry, GA State 1100 2,056 300 4,444 Q) c ~___. E ·- <( Oklahoma State Fair Oklahoma City, OK City 435 1,600 330 12,500 V) QJ V) !,..... American Royal Complex Kansas City, MO 501 (c )3 74 1,474 50 19,500 Q)V) +..Jc z Ohio State Fair Columbus, OH State 360 1,012 363 5,000 V) QJ Idaho Horse Park Nampa, 10 City 180 700 44 12,657 <( g <( u a. Taylor County Expo Center Abilene, TX 501 (c)3 117 750 502 5,000 E ~ UJ Extraco Events Center Waco, TX County 50 710 250 6,000 0 Vl c ro 1 Deschutes County Fair Redmond, OR County 132 400 106 4,000 0 Vl ___. Larimer County Fairgrounds Loveland, CO County 244 360 50 7,200 u c co L.U ro Douglas County Fairgrounds Castle Rock, CO County 45 244 10 2,801 '"0 ~ c QJ <( Clark County Fair Exhibition Center Ridgefield, WA County 170 222 25 225 ro ..c ,..., Hutchinson, KS State 179 221 900 c +..J 1..1.. Kansas State Fairgrounds 185 0 0 Island Grove Events Center Greeley, CO City/County 145 150 300 9,016 ·~; Pennsylvania Farm Show Complex and Expo Center Harrisburg, PA County 165 124 185 7,318 ::J c - QJ Average 250 940 210 7,500 L.U~ QJE ~ Median 170 710 220 5,500 +J u Q) c 0 IKansas Expocentre Topeka, KS County 74 245 76 1o,ooo 1 24 ~ ~ ,_ ~~ u Source: Facility Management -• Sorted by total number of horse stalls A RC H I TEC T :: POPULOUS ' Comparable Expo Facility Analysis Comparable Facility Summary
Largest Total Contiguous Indoor Event Enclosed Covered Outdoor Event Exhibit Event Facility Buildings Arenas Arenas Arenas Barns Halls Space Space Expo Square 13 2 0 0 5 6 334,000 630,900 Kentucky Exposition Center 32 2 0 0 22 8 425,700 1,062,600 Georgia National Fairgrounds 20 4 3 0 5 8 84,500 208,000 Oklahoma State Fair 19 1 0 1 10 7 70,000 328,000 American Royal Complex 5 2 0 0 0 3 96,000 315,400 Ohio State Fair 15 2 1 0 2 10 152,900 579,600 Idaho Horse Park 10 2 1 2 5 0 63,000 100,800 Taylor County Expo Center 10 2 2 0 2 4 26,800 114,200 Extraco E\ents Center 7 2 1 0 2 2 38,800 108,000 Deschutes County Fair 12 1 1 1 5 4 40,000 92,600 Larimer County Fairgrounds 11 3 0 2 0 6 45,000 220,800 Doulas County Fairgrounds 10 1 0 3 4 2 33,000 71,650 Clark County Fair Exhibition Center 12 1 0 1 6 4 97,200 183,600 Kansas State Fairgrounds 12 1 0 2 3 6 40,800 143,900 Island Gro\e E\ents Center 12 0 0 4 2 6 58,200 129,000 Pennsylvania Farm Show Complex and Expo Center 10 3 0 0 1 6 172,000 577,300 Average 13 2 1 1 5 5 111,120 304,150 Median 10 2 0 1 4 6 66,500 195,800 IKansas Expocentre 6 2 1 0 0 3 44,500 118,3oo 1
Source: Facility Management --1/ • • Sorted by total number of horse stalls A RCH I TEC T ::: POPULOUS " Comparable Expo Facility Analysis -ro ...... , c Demographics Comparison Q) V) ...... , ro Comparable Markets Topeka, KS 0 V) a.. c %of Rank QJ ro Low High Average Median Estimate Avg . (out of 17) ""'0~ :::s ro"' V) Population (.!) ~ - City 6,900 871 ,300 214,500 98,600 129,100 0 Q) 60% 7 ...... , C.. VI'" ...... , 0 30-Minute Drive 70,400 1,581 '700 676,500 622,300 260,400 38% 11 c ..._ '-....---; Q) c ___. 90-Minute Drive 234,700 4,691 ,800 2,465,200 2,627,800 2,671 ,000 108% 9 180-Minute Drive 1,056,900 28,816,400 8,768,000 6,332,300 5,723,500 65% 11 EVl ·-Q) <( Vl lo.... Average Household Income VlQ)...... , c z Vl Q) City $46,300 $121 ,700 $70,000 $66,100 $ 61 ,500 88% 11 <( g <( 30-Minute Drive $62,500 u c.. $122,900 $78,100 $75,800 $ 72,000 92% 12 90-Minute Drive $59,800 $93,700 $76,000 $72,900 $ 78,700 104% 6 E ~ UJ 0 V) 180-Minute Drive $66,800 $97,900 $78,600 $73,000 $ 73,000 93% 9 c ro 1 0 V) ___. u c ,.,.... Median Age w ro L.L.I City 29.6 40.7 35.0 35.4 37.3 107% 4 ""'0 ~ c Q) <( 30-Minute Drive 34.1 41.4 37.1 36.7 36.7 99% 9 ro ..c ,.,..,- 90-Minute Drive 34.6 42.6 37.7 37.6 36.7 97% 11 c ...... , L.L.. 0 0 180-Minute Drive 34.7 39.7 37.2 36.9 37.0 100% 8 ·~; Corporate Base :::s c -ro Q) City 200 26,800 7,900 3,400 5,700 72% 6 w> (])E ~ 30-Minute Drive 2,900 57,700 24,700 21,800 9,500 38% 11 ...... , u 90-Minute Drive 10,700 164,800 87,100 80,600 93,700 108% 8 Q) c 0 180-Minute Drive 38,700 1,019,200 307,100 226,900 210,700 69% 10 26 ~ ~ ~~ u Source: Esri Demographic Report, 2017 -• A RC H I T ECT :: POPULOUS ' Comparable Expo Facility Analysis Comparable Case Studies
FACILITY: Heartland Event Center
City, State: Grand Island, Nebraska
Ownership 501(c)3 Structure: Facility Exhibit Space: 180,000 sf Specs: Largest Contiguous Exhibit: 100,000 sf Total Arena Space: 55,500 sf Largest Indoor Arena : 30,000 sf Stalls: 1,200 stalls RV: 100 RV Hook-ups
Notes: • Opened in 2006, and the current home of the Nebraska State Fair.
• In 2012 the Five Points Bank Arena was added to the grounds as part of a $42 million investment to accommodate livestock and equestrian type shows at the fairgrounds. Five Points Bank has assisted with private funding totaling up to $750,000 over 10 years.
• The facility also has approximately 1,200 horse stalls, typically used for horse racing events at its outdoor track. Facility management indicated that they are only beginning to host other styles of equestrian events (rodeos, barrel racing, etc.) and focus primarily on livestock and agriculture events.
• The facility has also home to the Indoor Football League's Nebraska Danger since 2011.
• Source: Facility Management, 2017 - A R CH > TEC T ::: POPULOUS ' Comparable Expo Facility Analysis Comparable Case Studies FACILITY: Alliant Energy Center
City, State: Madison, Wisconsin
Owner: Dane County
Operator: Dane County
Facility Specs: Complex Acreage: 153 acres Exhibit Space: 385,000 sf Meeting Space: 20,300 sf Largest Contiguous Space: 200,000 sf Main Arena 24,900 sf; 10,200 seats Total Indoor Event Space: 452,200 sf Horse Stalls: 1,300 temporary stalls RV Hook-ups 139 RV hook-ups
Notes: Exhibition Hall at Alliant Energy Center is a 200,000 square-foot building that offers 100,000 square feet of exhibition space, a 30,000-square foot lobby and approximately 20,000 square feet of breakout meeting space.
There are approximately 500 hotel rooms surrounding AEC, including 140 at the Clarion Suites, which is connected to the Exhibition Hall.
The $24.9 million New Holland Pavilions were added to the campus in September 2014, and include an 80,000-sqare foot, climate controlled exhibition hall, a 190,000-square foot exhibition hall (no climate control), and 8,000 square feet of pre-function space. The space can be used for dirt-floor show rings, horse/livestock stabling/penning, tradeshow space, amateur sports tournaments/competitions and a variety of other such events.
Complex hosted 134 events and 707,200 attendees in a recent year of operations, including 27 convention/tradeshows and 21 sporting events (such as wrestling and roller derby tournaments.
The AEC is located less than 10 minutes from downtown Madison and the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus. =-• Source: Facility Management, 2017 ARCH IT E C T 9 F>A POPULOUS ' Comparable Expo Facility Analysis Comparable Case Studies
FACILITY: Oklahoma State Fairgrounds City, State: Oklahoma City, OK
Owner/Operator: Oklahoma City
Facility Specs: Complex Acreage: 435 acres Exhibit Space: 297,950 sf Largest Contiguous Space: 55,000 sf Arena Space : 30,000sf; 9,000 seats Total Indoor Event Space: 328,000 sf Horse Stalls: 2,600 stalls RV Hook-ups 330 hook-ups
Annual Events • Arabian Horse Youth Nationals • New World Comic Con • Oklahoma State Fair • International Finals Pro Rodeo • Oklahoma High School State Wrestling • Oklahoma Paint Horse State Show • Oklahoma State High School Basketball Championship • American Quarter Horse Association Central Championships • American Quarter Horse Youth Association World Championships
Notes: • Also known as the Horse Capital of the world the OKC State Fair Park annually hosts nearly 200 different world-class events.
• The Fairgrounds are currently under expansion and adding The Bennett Event Center, a 290,000-square foot expo center with over 200,000 square feet in contiguous floor space. The facility construction began in 2014 at a cost of $58.7 million and is scheduled to be completed in 18 months. -• Source: Facility Management, 2017 A R CHOT E C T ::: POPULOUS ' ,_===·-=.,--! Comparable Expo Facility Analysis Comparable Case Studies FACILITY: Tulsa Expo Square City, State: Tulsa, Oklahoma Owner: Tulsa County
=== Operator: Tulsa County
Facility Specs: Complex Acreage: 225 acres Exhibit Space: 471,300 sf Largest Contiguous Space : 334,000 sf Main Arena 28,100 sf; 4,500 seats Total Indoor Event Space: 630,900 sf Horse Stalls: 2,500 total stalls RV Hook-ups: 333 RV hook-ups
Event Buildings: 13 Enclosed Arenas: 2 Barns: 5 Event Halls: 6
Major Events: • American Paint Horse Association World Show • American Buckskin Annual World Championship Show • Kansas Paint Horse Congress • All American Appaloosa National Show • USA BMX Grand Nationals • Tulsa State Fair
Notes: The Tulsa Expo Square is one of the premier livestock and equestrian facilities in the country with 2,500 horse stalls, 13 event buildings including 2 enclosed arenas and 5 super barns including additional show rings, and over 630,000 square feet of total event space.
-• A RCH I T ECTS -"'• POPULOus · Comparable Expo Facility Analysis Event Activity Summary
KS Total Events By Event Type Facility A Facility B Facility C Facility D Facility E Facility F Expocentre li\€stock/Equestrian Shows 37 22 7 24 2 52 --24 55 Public/Consumer Shows 25 50 27 17 9 6 22 24
Con\€ntions/Tradeshows 20 0 27 0 13 4 11 0
Meetings/Banquets/Receptions 70 261 40 7 8 14 67 148
Fairs/Festivals 1 0 4 1 4 4 2 30 Sporting E\€nts 11 3 21 2 2 3 7 112
Entertainment 7 11 4 1 9 8 7 15
Other E\€nts/Misc. 26 220 4 0 34 70 59 23
Total 197 567 134 52 81 161 199 I 407
Total Attendance By Event Type Facility A Facility B Facility C Facility D Facility E Facility F KS Expocentre
li\€stock/Equestrian shows 33,295 - 71,648 - 1,200 - 35,381 43,096 Public/Consumer Shows 56,570 156,607 - 49,766 - 87,648 52,687 Con\€ntions/Trades hows 17,326 - 133,808 - 89,593 - 80,242 0 Meetings/Banquets/Receptions 28,293 - 41 ,390 6,355 - 25,346 75,693 Fairs/Festivals 251 ,650 - 155,865 138,285 - 181 ,933 50,814 Sporting E\€nts 55,664 - 88,171 - 8,126 50,654 55,736
Entertainment 30,100 - 49,504 - 61,252 46,952 76,369 Other E\€nts/Misc. 20,572 - 10,220 164,940 - 65,244 2,981
Total 493,470 - 707,213 - 519,517 - 573,400 357,376 Source: Facility Management I - A RCH I T E C T ::: POPULOUS ' Comparable Arena Analysis -ro .f-Jc Comparable Arena Summary (/)E ·-QJ <( Intrust Bank Arena Wichita, KS 2010 $206.5 County SMG CHL 15,750 (/) lo.... Indiana Farmers Coliseum Indianapolis, IN 1982 - City SMG AHL 14,800 (/) ""'0 ::::.:::: PPL Center Allentown, PA 2014 $177.0 City Global Spectrum AHL, PIFL 10,000 c QJ <( ro ..c ,...,- Santander Arena Reading, PA 2001 $36.5 BCCCA SMG ECHL, AIF 9,146 c .f-J L..L.. 0 0 Denny Sanford Premier Center Sioux Falls, SD 2014 $110.0 City SMG USHL, IFL 7,000 ·~; Average 1998 $120.2 13,300 ::J c Median 2001 $118.8 13,300 -ro w IKansas Expocentre Topeka, KS County 1o.ooo I w> QJE ~ .f-J u 0 U1 ...... !'.) !'.) ~ ~ U1 0 0 U1 0 U1 0 U1 0 U1 0 0 0 0 0 0 "'0 0"' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Comparable Arena Facilities Case Studies FACILITY: INTRUST BANK ARENA City, State: Wichita, Kansas Owner: Sedgwick County Operator: SMG Key Facility Capacity- Components: Hockey: 13,450 Basketball: 15,004 End-Stage Event: 10,100 Center-Stage Event: 15,750 22 Suites with avg. selling price of $48,000 per suite 40 loge boxes with avg. annual cost of $6,400 222 club seats with avg. selling price of $1,500 per seat Premium seating is approximately 95 percent sold Tenants: Wichita Thunder (ECHL} Wichita Force (CIF} Development: Opened in 2010, $206.5 million construction cost Since its opening, three hotels (417 rooms}, two new restaurants and a new retail store have opened $194 million in private investment since arena opening into downtown Wichita · Notes: Hosted 116 events with total attendance of • 297,647 in a recent year of operati-~ns A RCH I TEC T ;:: POPULous · Study Components Phase 2: Cost/Benefit Analysis 1. Kick-off visit/meetings/tours 1. Scenario refinement 2. Existing Expocentre analysis 2. Event & use estimates 3. Industry characteristics & trends 3. Financial operating estimates 4. Local market conditions 4. Economic impact estimates 5. Competitive & comparable facilities 5. Cost/benefit estimates 6. Market surveys & interviews 6. Report 7. Supportable building program 7. Presentations """"''""'~POPULOus·. Kansas Expocentre Complex Overview Map Event Space: 1 - Landon Arena 3- Exhibition Hall 7 - Domer Livestock 2 - Domer Livestock 4 - Heritage Hall Facility - Stall Barn Facility- Arenas 5 -Ag Hall 6 - Maner Conference Center Specifications: Landon Arena Exhibition Hall Stall Barn . 22,500 square foot arena . 44,500 square feet of exhibit . 245 horse stalls Fixed seating for 7,450 space Max capacity 10,000 Heritage Hall Domer Livestock Facilit~ . 4,175 square feet of event . 28,800 square foot facility space 240'x121 ' competition arena Agriculture Hall Bleacher seating for 1 ,400 . 17,800 square feet of event 200'x1 50' covered warm-up space arena . 76 RV Hookups Maner Conference Center 20,440 square feet event/meeting space Strengths: . Landon Arena seating . Enables smaller sales, . Fully covered with direct able to accommodate a banquets and civic events to access to warm-up and variety of large national be held at the Kansas show arenas scale events. Expocentre campus Connectivity of Domer . Each building is large enough Arenas to warm-up area to host moderately sized and stalls general sessions Challenges: Overall lack of warm No building offers a significant Low stall inventory relative to up/free ride space amount of contiguous event other complexes that host space national events Aging facilities Lack of development around No controlled access/fencing complex around grounds Difficulty with ingress/egress for animal trailers -• Source: Kansas Expocentre Facility Management, floorplans A RC H IT E C T S- r>,o. POPULOus·· Kansas Expocentre Historical Event and Attendance Levels Total Events by Event Type %Change 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012-16 Equestrian/Livestock/Animal 55 53 65 71 55 0% Am Sports 6 7 10 7 5 -20% Community Ice 206 148 120 136 88 -134% Roadrunner Hockey 20 18 19 13 18 -11% Tradeshow/Consumer show 33 30 27 30 25 -32% l\lleetings/Banquets/Receptions 144 147 155 151 154 6% Fairs/Festivals 25 26 26 26 29 14% EntertainmenUPromoter Show 21 20 25 17 15 -40% Other 14 20 17 14 16 13% ------Total 524 469 464 465 405 I -23% Total Attendance by Event Type %Change 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012-16 Equestrian/Livestock/Animal 54,329 24,191 26,895 41,683 43,096 -26% Am Sports 27,309 28,564 42,778 28,629 29,720 8% Community Ice 12,392 11,969 11,444 11,303 5,937 -109% Roadrunner Hockey 35,008 28,309 28,816 17,975 20,079 -74% Trades how/Consumer show 66,783 59,547 54,125 55,312 53,187 -26% l\lleetings/Banquets/Receptions 91 '172 77,423 94,923 81,596 77,917 -17% Fairs/Festivals 60,163 59,469 69,991 56,218 50,464 -19% EntertainmenUPromoter Show 90,950 77,023 62,276 73,921 76,369 -19% Other 800 574 805 720 607 -32% Total 438,906 367,069 392,053 367,357 357,376 -35% Source: Facility management, 2017 -• A R CHITEC T ::: POPULOUS " Kansas Expocentre Historical Financial Operating Results 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Operating Re\enues Facility rent $ 1,231,367 $ 1 '127,345 $ 1,377,445 $ 1,369,811 $ 1,279,704 Food service (net) 274,638 235,197 283,922 311,137 325,330 Contract service/other 264,903 181,481 66,750 6,188 61,468 Total Operating Re\enues 1,770,908 1,544,023 1,728,117 1, 687,136 1,666,502 Operating Expenses: Salaries and benefits $ 1,522,357 $ 1,555,760 $ 1,579,942 $ 1,541,790 $ 1,510,670 Contract labor 197,201 177,256 175,205 176,169 175,483 Utilities 581,471 586,369 627,257 599,582 637,974 Repair & maintenance 104,792 113,397 129,702 147,555 162,063 General & administrati've 78,300 56,706 63,045 59,854 83,590 Supplies 73,179 66,509 92,928 89,884 100,474 Insurance 154,969 162,881 175,521 158,735 157,208 Other 6,321 3,511 6,933 9,551 7,061 Total Operating Expenses 2,718,590 2,722,389 2,850,533 2,783,120 2,834,523 Net Operating Deficit ($947,682) ($1 ,178,366) ($1,122,416) ($1 ,095,984) ($1 ,168,021) - ., -- Source: Facility management, 2017 -• ARCH I TEC T ::: POPULOUS ' Local Market Conditions Destination Amenities Overview- Nearby Key Amenities Count Hotel 1 Restaurant 2 0• Quick Service 1 Cafe/Bakery 0 • Bar/Lounge/Nightlife 0 / '"""''""'~POPULOus·. Local Market Conditions Destination Amenities Overview- Downtown Key Amenities Count Hotel 2 Restaurant 8 0• Quick Service 7 Cafe/Bakery 3 • Bar/Lounge/Nightlife 2 -• ARCHITECT ;:: POPULous · > "n I ~ ~ n 'tJ 0 'tJc: r- 0 c: ~ I Location and Accessibility Driving distance to Regional Cities Distance Si- lls "'.J \ ; from Drive Sioux Falls Madison Milwaukee City Topeka Time 0 0 .... ,_ f Kansas City, 1\110 I 65 mi. 1:03 Sioux City 0 Wichita, KS 141 mi. 2:13 Rockford o Chicago Omaha, NE 169 mi. 2:48 Cedar Rapids IOWA 0 C- go Des l'vbines, lA 257 mi. 3:49 Iowa C•ty 0 De- es 0 - Omaha T I Naperville Tulsa, OK 219 mi. 3:55 Des Moines Oklahoma City, OK 294 mi. 4:19 ~ ' 1 . ) Lincoln l St. Louis, 1\110 311 mi. 4:35 0 Peoria I 0 I Sioux Falls, SO 344 mi. 5:16 ,- / ' Chicago, IL 573 mi. 8:36 ILLINOIS .. ) Springfield I J 0 Topeka . .I · Kan- lty ' I -- Columbia 0 LJ\.,~enceKansas City r- S- is I MISSOURI St. louis Evansville 0 Mark rwam '\ "' we Wichita Nattonaf Forest ' ) Springfield 0 ·,}~t l )' - I I I { Bra~s~ 1r Q ~t,r.[ ,. Clarl ARCHITEC T Source: Goo~leMaps , Esri, 2017 ;: POPULous · Demographics Key Topeka Area Metrics Shawnee Demographic Variable Topeka County I 30-Minutel I 90-Minutel I 180-Minutel Kansas u.s. Population (2000) 124,527 169,871 224,218 2,258,340 4,941,814 2,688,418 281 ,421 ,906 Population (2010) 127,473 177,934 241 ,275 2,481 ,546 5,287,417 2,853,118 308,745,538 Population (2017) 129,163 181 ,322 249,399 2,594,049 5,490,632 2,960,265 323,580,626 % Change (2000-2017) 3.7% 6.7% 11.2% 14.9% 11.1% 10.1% 15.0% Population (2022 est.) 130,268 183,377 255,35211 2.694.369 I 5,662,6431 3,046,265 337,326,118 %Change (2017-2022) 0.9% 1.1% I 2.4% 3.9% 1 3.1% 2.9% 4.2% Avg. Household Inc. (2017) $58,632 $66,709 $69,587 $75,375 $69,528 $71,413 $77,008 Avg. Household Inc. (2022 est.) $63,246 $72,609 $76,154 $82,594 $76,413 $78,454 $84,021 %Change (2017-2022) 7.9% 8.8% 9.4% 9.6% 9.9% 9.9% 9.1% 1\tledian Age (2017, in years) 37 38.7 I 37.31 I 36.41 I 371 36.7 38.0 Businesses (2017) 6,304 7,673 10,023 102,782 228,019 131 ,931 13,207,211 Employees (2017) 94,632 109,669 134,165 1,519,824 3,073,611 1,646,329 162,998,347 Employee/Residential Pop. Ratio 0.73:1 0.60:1 0.54:1 0.59:1 0.56:1 0.66:1 0.50:1 Source: Esri, 2017 -• ARCH I TECT ;:: POPULous · Local Market Conditions Existing Hotel Supply Map #of ):f Key Hotel Rooms C8 Menoken Capitol Plaza Hotel Topeka 224 Ramada Hotel & Convention Center 213 b ;j Ramada Topeka West 141 ...!}..., •8- Hyatt Place 126 .oo..~.,....r-, ~i ~ Clubhouse Inn & Suites 120 .., Woodspring Suites t\(Jf•" 105 tvbtel 6-Fairlawn 102 Topeka !lA ... Relax Inn 91 Courtyard by rvlarriott 90 .. S£5r"lA<1P Hampton Inn 89 Washbu • Universo Holiday Inn Express & Suites North 81 0 ijj ansas Expoc~ntre Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites 81 _,., ..·1" C::l ~ - ~ .( Econo Lodge 78 i ~ Studio 6 78 :; ., .:lith~1 Plaza Inn & Suites 70 G) Residence Inn by rvlarriott - Extended Stay 66 ~.., Travelers Inn 65 Comfort Suites 64 ~CfD -,.-- ""1' Super 8 at Forbes Landing ·# -Q" 63 Baymont Inn & Suites 62 [ ~llt'lt;.t J "'''" Days Inn 62 ~ .. 1 Fairfield Inn by rvlarriott 62 1 Country Inn & Suites 60 ,., ')2.':1 • .... , 11\"!.j- '"f ~;·.J~ gle ··~.,., Gl tl . Econo Lodge- Wanamaker 60 0 c__Pa. Senate Luxury Suites Hotel M•p d•t• $20 17 Goeog!e r.r.,, 51 Topeka Total Hotel Inventory: 2,430 Rooms Source: Topeka CVB, Google Maps, Esri, 2017 -• ARCH , TEC T ;:: POPULous · Local Market Conditions Existing Meeting Facilities Total Largest #of HQ @ Map Meeting Contig. Hotel Menoken @ Key Facility Space Space Rooms .!'>"" l'v1aner Conference Center 20,440 11,000 224 b 4 l'v1asonic Center 10,700 10,700 0 @) ' Ramada Hotel & Convention Center 32,000 8,670 213 '•<-.,, w 'C. Ramada Topeka West 10,300 6,840 141 Great Overland Station 6,770 6,770 0 ~-...,. 0 ,•,t.u A.~ Topeka Performing Arts Center 15,300 6,500 0 w Gage Park Washburn University 6,300 6,300 0 \o A, Norsemen Brewing Company 7,000 6,000 0 ,.,,...... •. "£:"' Capitol Plaza Hotel 5,200 5,200 224 ;-:: Sixth Avenue Ballroom 5,000 5,000 0 w ....• Kansas Expocentre :; "' -~ . QD ~.:..·:.-, ~ .i 'I ~rt-!.1 ; ~ .. "l • ·-~ ",. ~ -:-.c- ![ ~ ~ nO QD ,. ~ ;.. '; 0 _o1 ' jLS Go l__g le Pauhne M•~ d;~a ,£ Source: Topeka CVB, Google Maps, 2017 -• ARCH I TEC T ::: POPULous · Competitive Market Analysis -ro ...... , c Competitive Livestock/Equestrian Facilities OJ Vl ...... , ro Columbus ,-~ - ij7 Distance Total 0 Vl ' I '· Map Ownership To Topeka Size Horse RV 0.. c Omaha 0 Key Facility City, State Structure (miles) (in acres) Stalls Hookups OJ ro Pttp4flo()l'l• 'o 6ellevue ""'C~ j j Island American Royal Kansas City, MO 501(c)3 62 74 1,474 50 Vor< @)ij; ·:; ro' ' V) ij7 - I I Missouri State Fairgrounds Sedalia, MO State 145 280 400 348 l9 ~ - ' . ~no• I Lancaster E-.ents Center Lincoln, NE 501 (c)3 169 '}!_ \ 167 800 200 ...... ,0 C..OJ \.1 I ' '"" Kansas State Fairgrounds Hutchinson, KS State 179 185 200 221 ...... , 0 '- 8foiif~ c 1- ,....._ 0 \'... [ Tulsa Expo Square Tulsa, OK County 225 240 2,500 333 OJ c :...J E ·- { Average 160 190 1,070 Vl OJ Median 170 190 800 Vl !::; <( OJ c z ij; ~ OJ Kansas Expocentre <( g <( Mant>anan u c.. 0 Junction C1ty 0 E ~ Salina Par1c UJ 0 0 Vl ijij @ 0c Vlro > SAS ijJ u c tm~onaW w ro - M I~ ""'C ~ L_ ll~tof,~bn V c OJ r- ..r::. c...... ,ro L_- ~~~~' Wochlta leb 0 0 r- 0 ..f:j ~ UJ ·h., P1n";!>"rg w ro...... , a_ ::J c SptlllQf,~d - OJ Joplin I 0 w w~ EOJ ~ ,l I D11r1i""'llt ...... ,u ijj . 0 'I ! OJ c l ~[SI~YAII(II w 0 [nld L t • ~oge•• 0 14 ~ ~ I • .. ... fl ... Stollwater ~-'@' -··-. ~~ u 0 F1ye~ev111e Brok • OKLAHOMA e~Arrow Source: Google Maps, Esri, 2017 - A RCH I T EC::T9 -P4 POPULOus · Competitive Market Analysis Competitive Livestock/Equestrian Facilities Missouri Lancaster Kansas Tulsa American State Events State Expo Kansas Royal Fairgrounds Center Fairgrounds Square Expocentre Average Median City, State Kansas City, MO Sedalia, MO Lincoln, NE Hutchinson, KS Tulsa, OK Topeka, KS Ownership Structure 501(c)3 State 501(c)3 State County Distance to Topeka (miles) 62 145 169 179 225 Size (in acres) 74 280 167 185 240 74 189 185 Total Horse Stalls 1,474 400 800 200 2,500 245 1,075 800 RV Hookups 50 348 200 221 333 76 230 221 Largest Arena Seating 19,500 2,360 300 900 4,500 10,000 5,512 2,360 Event Buildings 5 14 9 12 13 6 11 12 Enclosed Arenas 2 1 3 1 2 2 2 2 Covered Arenas 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 Outdoor Arenas 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 Barns 0 4 1 3 5 0 3 3 Event Halls 3 7 3 6 6 3 5 6 Largest Contig. Exhibit Space 96,000 19,400 83,000 40,800 334,000 44,500 114,640 83,000 Total Indoor Event Space 315,400 106,800 235,700 143,900 630,900 118,300 286,540 235,700 -• A RC HITEC T :=: POPULous · ,_ ...... _, Competitive Market Analysis -ro +.Jc Competitive Livestock/Equestrian Facility Event Summary (l) Vl +.J ro 0 Vl Cl.. c American Royal Complex (Kansas City, MO) (l) ro ""'0::::.::::: The American Royal Complex has competitive position due to its location in a larger market and proximity to the ·::; ro"' Vl Kansas Expocentre. The facility hosts national level horse and equestrian shows annually such as; American l9 ~ - Quarter Horse, Arabian Horse Shows, American Hunter/Jumper, and National Cutting Horse Association shows. 0 Q) I "" +.J 0.. '-' I +.Jc 1-0 '-,--_ (l) c :...J Missouri State Fairgrounds (Sedalia, MO) E ·- With close proximity to the Kansas Expocentre and a higher total stall count the Missouri State Fairgrounds have a V'I Q) <( V'l !...... +-' competitive stance with their capabilities to host larger equine based events. (l) c z ~ Q) <( g <( u 0.. Lancaster Events Center (Lincoln, NE) E ~ UJ The Lancaster Events Center's largest contiguous exhibit hall has nearly double the space than the Kansas 0 Vl Expocentre allowing it to accommodate larger conventions, tradeshows and consumer shows. 0c roVl u c > LU ro - Kansas State Fairgrounds (Hutchinson, KS) ""'0 ::::.::::: 1- c Q) With central positioning within the state the Kansas State Fairgrounds have a competitive location in terms of ro ..c. - c +-' attractive state association equine events by better accommodating the western and southern parts of the state. 0 0 1- ·.;; ~ UJ ro +-' :::s c 0... Expo Square (Tulsa, OK) - Q) With the higher overall count of total stalls, arenas and barns, the Expo Square hosts some of the nation's largest LU~ Q)E ~ equine events including the American Paint Horse World Show, American Buckskin Annual World Championship +.J u (l) c 0 Show, Kansas Paint Horse Congress, All American Appaloosa National Show. 16 ~ ~ ~~ u -• Source: Facility management, 2017 ARCH I TEC T :: POPULOUS " Competitive Market Analysis Competitive Exhibition Centers 0 Columbus Largest ( w Distance Contiguous I Map Ownership To Topeka Exhibit Pn~-~levu Key Facility City, State Structure (miles) Space YOfC I w o w American Royal Kansas City, MO 501(c)3 62 96,000 Kansas City Convention Center Kansas City, MO City 63 388,800 KCI Expo Center Kansas City, MO City 71 70,000 ~ ..,., . .. I Century II Performing Arts & Convention Center Wichita, KS City 140 93,000 Missouri State Fairgrounds Sedalia, MO State 145 19,400 ij; Centurylink Center Omaha Omaha, NE City 167 194,300 Lancaster Events Center Lincoln, NE 501(c)3 169 83,000 Kansas State Fairgrounds Hutchinson, KS State 179 40,800 Kansas Expocentre Tulsa Expo Square Tulsa, OK County 225 334,000 Manhanan 1 - 0 ty Average 140 146,600 un<:ll~nC•ty~ • ijj Median --- 150 93,000 Salina a 5 ijj I 0 lm~1o W ~ ..:w "0 " I I. efl Jog"" 'II:P 133rtl~•""" 0 ijj Brant, ~ • I. [n>d R<>?,t>•s St11lwatH 0 Faye'Jev•lle OKLAHOMA .Broken0 Arrow Source: Google Maps , Esri, 201 7 -• ARCH IT EC T S-<>"- POPULOus · Competitive Market Analysis -ro +J c Largest Contiguous Exhibit Space Comparison Q) V') +-~ ro 0 V') a.. c a; ro -o~ Tulsa Expo Square 334,000 ::J ro"' V) t!J ..:X:: - Centurylink Center Omaha 0 Q) 194,300 +-~a. '""' I +J 0 '- c I- ~ Q) c ...... American Royal 96,000 E ·- <{ V') Q) V') ,_ Q) +J Century II Perf. Arts & Conv. Ctr. 93,000 V') c z V') Q) <( g , u a. "-&... Lancaster Events Center 83,000 E ~ UJ 0 V') c ro 1 KCI Expo Center 70,000 0 V') ...... u c ~ L.U ro L..L.I -o ~ ,- Kansas Expocentre 44,500 c Q) "-&... ro ...c ,...,- c +J L.l... 0 0 Kansas State Fairgrounds 40,800 ·-+J +JV') ~ ro +-~ ::J c ~ Missouri State Fairgrounds -ro Q) 19,400 L.U> Q)E ~ +J u 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300 '000 . 350' 000 Q) c 0 18 ~ ~ Exhibit Space ~~ u • Source: Facility management, 2017 - A RCH I TEC T ;:: POPULous · I --· Competitive Market Analysis Competitive Arenas 0 Colombot w Distance Largest Map Ownership To Topeka Arena a . Key Facility City, State Structure (miles) Seating P• p•e 6eUevoe Providence l'v1edical Center Amphitheater ~Island vo" ij; Bonner Springs, KS Private 49 18,000 0 ij; LltlColn 0 I Sprint Center Kansas City, MO City 62 19,300 ~ng· Starlight Amphitheater Kansas City, MO City 71 8,000 Silverstein Eye Centers Arena Independence, MO City 79 7,000 8 PAI UC'' I Tony's Pizza Event Center Salina, KS City 110 7,500 \ Century II Performing Arts & Convention Center Wichita, KS City 140 2,495 ijj Missouri State Fairgrounds Sedalia, MO State 145 2,360 Centurylink Center Omaha Omaha, NE City 167 18,300 w r Tulsa Expo Square Tulsa, OK County 225 4,500 Kansas Expocentre Chisholm Trail Expo Center Enid, OK County 248 9,000 Mant;-nan _A~- ty Average -- 130 9,600 onctl~nClly ~ ~ 7 . Ci Median 80 7,750 fl:1 Ov • . e "Ql;J ! SAS ijj Em~la W I i I • M I~ llutchmson ~ J. 0 l~ h P•n",!'urg e Sprt11<1f1eld Joghn e llnnl""ll~ loo 0 ijj • 81anson • l ' w . '· R<><;J~• ~ 0 51,11w 0 0 0 Fa ye~ev''Ie OKLAH O MA Broken Alrow Source: Google Maps, Esri, 2017 -• ARCH IT E C T 9- p.,. POPULOUS ' -I QJ ...c...... , ~ 0 I ...... ,QJ ...... ,ro V) tlO c ·-u c ro -c> <( . . ' . . G) z E::a ~m r - -- en I I I "' ~0 I ""'- I I I ' 2j:J: ! ~I ~3: ~ mm ~z C3C m c =;= )> r1.,._._ : !:t '====- m i I ::a :L __ l r== . z ~ m _J:::, en co ,--- : [J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~0 1 1 11111 1111111 ~. 1 111111111111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. II I I I I I I I I I I I 1. 11111111 1111111 :A: )> z ~ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I (J) )> (J) m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I X -o 0 n I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. m z_, :::0 I I I I I I I I I I I I m 1 / ::s: )> (J)_, m :::0 -o I )> z RECOMMENDED ALTERNATES MULTI-USE EQUINE I EXPO GN ~~~ I I -16..!!!.....!!.======-==~===.d... ------_j 49 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN z <( _j o_ 0::: w 1- (J) <( 2: w 0::: 1-z w u 0 o_ X w (J) <( (J) z <( ::::( w u z <( z w z~ <( ~ 0 w~ 1-ffi - LL Cl)~ ~en Tl- Sj-1 ~m 0 3: )> z ---1 m z )> z n m ()l N :A )> z (f) )> (f) m X """'0 0 n m z ---j :::0 m ~ )> (f) ---j m :::0 """'0 I )> z z <( _j o_ 0::: w f- (j) <( 2: w 0::: f-z w u 0 o_ X w (f) <( (f)z <( ~ en 1- u ...,w 0 C:: w c. ~ PROJECT BUDGET & SCHEDULE (assumes continuous design and construction at most reasonable and expodicous timeline} (based on preliminary estimates 10-13-2017} Qj 00 0"1 0 ...... l:lO ...... N N ~· Analysis of th e return on investment indicated t he to t ality ro 0 0 0 0 ro ..:.::. I' N 00 N 0"1 N 0 N ...... u ...... N N > of projects programmed be completed within five years t o ro 0 ...... 0 ...... 0 ...... 0 ...... 0 -c c... N - N - N - N - N Qj > > > ...... al low events . operations and cit izens to rea lize the fu ll va lue ...... ro - ro - ro - ro - of the improvements . Mainta ining continuity of opera t ions Qj ..., QJ ..., QJ ..., QJ E througho ut construct ion is cr itica l to the long term success of this project. The projects presented herein are pr ior itized Recommended Prioritv Initial Need with in th e scope of t he master p lan but deta iled schedu les New Livestock Barn wi ll be fur t her developed that prov ide for continuous New Livestock Arena $9.764 operation of Expocentre faci lities throughout construction . Renovation Domer Arena Renovation Existing Barn $2,328,125 This table represents a spend down schedule related to the Expansion Landon/Expo B $4,522,475 three project packages: Renovation Expo Hall B $1,977,623 Renovation Arena B $8,835,810 A) Multi -Pu rpose Equin e I Livestock I Expo facil ity Exoanded RV/Parkin c expans ions Renovation I C $2,882,352 B) Landon A rena and Expo renovations and expansions Subtotal Construction $30,311,265 C) Site renovations . expansion and development General Softcosts and Contengencies $ Add itional Unmet Need - Recommended Initial Add Des - I Alternates represent priorit ized proje ct additi on alternate s. CA $2,933,000 These w ill only be authorized if construction costs come in Total Est. Value Base Construction (* } $30,311,265 below estimates . Total Est. Value Project Costs $6,088,735 Subtotal Est. Base Project Costs $36,400,000 Unmet Need - Not Funded represents project scope items Estimated Bond Finance Costs $8,600,000 that were ident ified as needs but do not f it with in the Total Initial Need Project Costs(* ) current p roject budget. Add itiona l funds wou ld need to be identified to realize these improvements . Refer to fol lowing page and appendi x for itemized project list of al l funded and unfunded items . Alternates I I I $2,795,767 1 I I I 1 Total Project Costs with Alternates $47,795,767 Unmet Need- Not Funded Unmet Needs Not Considered or Funded I I I $12,100,000-$22,669,750 I I I I Total Costs Including All Unmet Need $59,807,032- $70,376,782 (* ) Excludes UnMet Need Priority Alternates. Excludes Umnet needs removed from consideration. - (Unmet Need Priority Alternates: $2,795,767. Recommend as part of Initial Design and engineering. Bid/Construct as funding allows) - (Unmet Need Not Considered as Fundable: $12,100,000. Considered highest priority unmet need at Landon/Expo for needed modernization and deferred maintenance) - (Unmet Need Not Considered as Fundable Total : $22,700,00. Includes $12,100,000 above, and considered Additional Entry and Concourse Expansions, w/connection to Landon Concourse & Equine Barn} 55 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN PROJECT DETAILS OVERVIEW RECOMMENDED PRIORITY RECOMMENDED PRIORITY INITIAL NEEDS • Existing Toilets Renovation; add new toilets EQUINE • Exter ior Skin Repa ir - new meta l panel ra in screen system UNMET ADDITIONAL NEED - • Arena/Stall Bar West Foundation Wall Waterproofing & over waterproof membrane & existing pane ls (Recommended Initial Add Alternates) Drainage • Guest/Performers Lounge Renovation and fin ishes ALTERNATES- EQUINE • Domer Renovation - new Insulation, remove wash bays, upgrades • Covered Connector - Domer to New Arena; renovate restrooms, renovate cafe. LED Lighting • Inter ior Energy Efficient Li ghting - Bow l Only- Event • Covered Connector - Domer to New Stall Barn; • Existing Covered Arena Renovation - new Insu la tion , Add Li gh tin g and Contro ls • Covered Connector - Domer to Landon Arena paved circu lation to Domer, Enclose east side, Impro ve • Interior Energ y Effic ient Lighting and Contro ls- Non-Bowl • Dirt Storage Venti lation, LED Lighting Only • Hay/ Shavings Storage and Concession • Ex isting Stall Barn Renovation - new Insulation, Aspha lt • Inter ior Paint • Wi -Fi Floor, New Wash Bays, New Ramp, Renovate Restroom and • New Northeast entry lobby, new concess ions, stair, and Show Office Finishes ground level expansion space ALTERNATES- LANDON ARENA & EXPO HALL • New Covered Arena - Includes 130x280 clear span arena, • New Pantry for premium seating service • Acoust ics - Upper Deck Masking Curtains 30' lean to for seating or staging • Premium Seat ing - End Zone Bar & Loge seating • LED Signage / Ribbon Board • New Stall Barn - 240 Stalls; Includes 16 wash bays, 90' • Product ion Office Renovat ion • Replace Power Boxes central clear span w/ two 30' lean-to, restrooms, No AC • Seat Replacement - Lower and Upper Deck • Sound System - Concourse/Suites/Pub lic Entri es • Paging/ Sound System replacement • Sound System - Bowl • Video Display 20' x 35' • Point of Sa le Upgrade at concessions and portables • Two New Locker Rooms • Wi-Fi • Structural Steel Repair • Upgrades to ex isting Elevator finishes and speed • Upgrade Security System for video surveillance and access UNMET NEED - (Not Funded) con trol doors SITE ARENA & EXPO HALL • 4 " concrete sidewalks • Arena Broadcast Headend and Infrastru cture EXPOSITION HALL • Adjust existing manhole • Arena End Video Display (2) • Beer Coolers replacement • Asphalt repair and replace- Cold milling of asphalt, 2.25" • Arena Roof Replacement • Existing Toilets Renovation; Add new Toilets aspha lt surface, 6" asphalt • Arena Storage • Exterior Signage Upgrade/ Wayfinding / Main Entry Sign • Combined curb & gutters and inlets • Arena Upgrade Security System • HVAC Rooftop Units+ Chil ler Replacement • Concrete curb & gutter removal • Breakout Rooms (green rooms) 5 to 6, 25 to 50 people • Interior Energy Efficient LED Lighting and Controls • Concrete sidewalk and pavement removal Admin Office Location move • Interior Paint • Demo Vehicu lar Ticketing Kiosks/ Replace Paving • Digita l Signage / Supplementary Display System • Upgrade Security System for video surveillance and access • Large tree removal Concourse / Suites/ Public Entrie s control doors • Pavement markings and whee l stops • Expo Acoustical Wall Treatment • Wi-Fi • Remove and Reset existing light poles; paint po les and • Expo Exter ior Skin Repair replace fi xt ures • Expo Sound System LANDON ARENA • Remove existing RV electrica l hookups • Freight Elevator Enlargement • Acoustic Banners & Acoustics Wall Treatment • RV Hookups - Proposed Addition of 56 RV spaces w/ Back • Ice Maintenance • ADA access - Unisex toilets / concessions counters 34 " to Back Pedestals • New South East Entry Southeast entry lobby (no new • Arena Boiler Replacement • Security barrier fencing and 30' gates concessions) stair and ground level expansion space etc. • Arena Emergency Generator Replacement • Security Fenc ing and Gates & Bollards • Premium Seating - Suites • Center Video Board • Storm sewer pipe replacement, earthwork, and landscaping • Concessions Equipment Upgrade SITE • Concessions Re-Branding Fa~adeChanges • Bird Screen on Arena and Expo • Concourse ADA Seating Platforms • Gazebo Roof and Ra ili ng Repair • Ex isting Locker Room Renovat ion • Parking Lot Wi-Fi 56 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN Study Background and Purpose The purpose of this study is to perform a market evaluation and economic assessment study to guide a series of renovation and expansion projects at the Kansas Expocentre in Topeka, Kansas. • ARCHITEC T ,::: POPULous · G) z '( l ' - ) j l ; ~ 0 A )> z (J) )> (J) m X """0 0 () m z ---1 :::0 m ~ )> (J) ---1 m :::0 """0 I )> z z <( _j Q_ a: w f (f) <( 2: w a: fz w u 0 Q_ X w (f) <( (f)z <( ::::( z <( __j o_ er:: w 1- IJ) <( 2:: .Jvt ..M. - w er:: 1- I I I I I I I I I I I I z w u 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o_ X w IJ) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I <( IJ) z <( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I R:JF I I I I I I I I I I I I I f="""' F== I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - 1- 0 -- -, c. I I :l. I I I >< I I w 1-- ~ r-r w ~ ~ -z ~-- -- ::law w~ ~ w~ ~ ]- ~ en~ I I I ::lz I I ~ I I i I I 1-"-1 · ~ -. I I - I !:i~ --- ...J :::)ffi z ~~ C) r --- 1 I I I I I i ll Ei =r- ~ m >< 'j _~lt==="'::::::=:R=F=-======--I b.=lll -c 0 - ...... . \ - - F= I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~1 111111 111111 1 ~ · 111111 1111111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ill I I I I I I I I I I I I /\: )> z hI I I I I I I I I I I I I I (J) )> (J) m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I X -u 0 n I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m z ---1 :::0 I I I I I I I I I I I I m ~ )> (J) ---1 m :::0 -u r )> z z <( _j Q_ cr: w 1- (j) <( 2:: / w cr: 1- I I I I I I I I I I I I z w u 0 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' Q_ X w (f) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I <( (J) z <( .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ::::( ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ruJ ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I f='- J====- I I I I I I I I I I I I I "=====- 0 - ~ 0 ---, c. I ~ I I I I >< I I w r-==- oS w b z ='==- ::)- ~w w en !1::J:: ::) ~ I U ~ - w """tAr v~ !:i ~ --- ::) ~ z E ~ C) MULTI-USE EQUINE I EXPO NEW PROJECTS GN 280'x130' COVERED ARENA STAGING/ VIEWING AREA 46 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN MULTI-USE EQUINE I EXPO NEW PROJECTS N ~ r .JB ~-~Sl------_18~~-~~81__------J8 ~-~m_--, lc=:::;\1 I' I I I I I I I I I I I 14==¥ I I I I I I I I I I I I I t=JI I L_;] m I I I lm [;] I I I I I I I m JJJJJJJ TI m1 EIIIIIEEIIIIj [ JJJ I I I [JJJJJJJJJJTI EIIIIIEIIIIISTALJL BARN- 240 STALLS [ I JJJJJJJ [[[[[[[[[[[] I [ J IIIJ I I lm ml I I I [JJJJJJJ JJJJJ I I I 18 [[[ [[[ [ [[[ [[ j 8 1 I I I I Lm - -. lt---j I, I I I I I I I I I I I .1-----1. I I I I I I I I I I I I I f=-1 1 L ~~-~~ l?hc!~~ ~~-~f!:!j_j LOAD/ UNLOAD LAN E 47 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN C¥ Fii)> ~::c ?5m tSz ~)> z -j m z )> z n / m N m /\: )> z (/) )> (/) m X """0 0 (} m z ---j :::0 m 3: )> (/) - ---j m :::0 ' """0 I )> z w 0::: 1--z w u 0 o_ X w lf) w / u / z <{ z w 1-z zo ~ J J:l Laj ~ I ' ( N J (X) r ;A: )> z (}) )> (}) m X """0 0 () m z ---1 :::0 m 3: )> (}) ---1 m :::0 """0 I )> z w 0::: 1--z w u 0 o.._ X w (f) <( (f) z <( 2( / (p.J 0 A :t> z (/) :t> (/) m X """0 0 () m z ---l :::0 m 3:: :t> (/) ---l m :::0 """0 I :t> z w 0::: fz w u 0 o_ X w (/) <( (/)z <( ~ ~ J l G) ffi)> z ~;:a ;8m ~ 2Z I 1 T ff '"' 5l> (J) r ;::>:::: )> z (J) )> (J) m X -u 0 n m z ---l :::0 m ~ )> (J) ---l m :::0 -u I )> z z <( _j Q_ 0::: w 1-- (J) <( 2:: w 0::: 1-- z w u 0 Q_ X w (J) <( (J) z <( ::::( llLIJt / RECOMMENDED ALTERNATES ARENA GN "' trpr lftVO liar I 1!.. '""'§ ;=J / L ~if ~ :t // A...... / ~r---:r-r==~·-, ,,t I 1 ~~:~~- '~h ~ 34 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN z <( _j Q_ cr: w 1- (j) <( 2: w cr: 1-z w u 0 Q_ X w (j) <( (j) z <( :::{ - en J [ ( w ' ~ z c::: w !:i l ; /\: )> z (J) )> (J) m X u 0 n m ___,z ::::0 m ::?:: )> (J)___, m ::::0 u I )> z z w a: 1- z w u 0 0... X w IJ) / 1 \ r r l \_ - i ...J l L ...J ~ ~ '\ NEW COVERED ARENA FLOOR PLAN - 280 'x130' GN 280'xl30' COVERED ARENA STAGING/ VIEWING AREA 20 KANSA S EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN MULTI-USE STALLING AND EXPO BUILDING Any new facility will maximize the flexibility in types of events that can be hosted. The new multi-use stalling /Expo facility wi ll allow an increase in stall capacity as well as conditioned space for sports events and other flat shows. For equestrian events, CSL indicated a need to expand stalling capacity to a total of 450 to 500 stalls for maximum economic benefit related to equestrian events. The proposed multi-use stalling facility is designed to accommodate up to 240 new stalls in a lO'xlO' grid which will bring the total indoor stall count to around 450 including the existing stall barn after renovations. The stalls are proposed as high quality portable units so they may be removed to leave an open floor with full capability to accommodate a trade show or expo event that typically also uses a lO'xlO' booth module . The electrical and other utility requirements for a modern stalling facility are very similar to that required for an expo hall. The proposed multi-use facility will be an indoor heated venue with an option for air conditioning depending on budget. The proposed facility is connected to the Landon Arena complex via a landscaped outdoor plaza with the possibility of a covered or indoor connector to be added in the future. Covered connectors are proposed to provide appropriate connectivity for equestrian events to the existing Domer complex and the proposed new covered arena. Restrooms are designed to accommodate the needs for an expo event w ithin the buildings. 21 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDED FACILITY PLANS MULTI-USE STALLING AND EXPO FACILITY- 240 STALLS N ~ , ___IG:- - ~GIL ______JG ~ :-- ~ ~ GIL______JG :- - ~ 8L --, ~~ r I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 14==4' 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 e::=::t1 1 1[3 [3 1 I I I I I I 1[3 [[[ [[[ [ [[[ [[ ] [3 1 I fJJJJJJJJJJTI I I I I [[[ [[[ [ [[[ [[ ] [JJJJJJJJJJTI STALL BARN - 240 STALLS []] ]]] ] ]] [ [[ ] [[[[[[[[ [ [[[] I I I r: :r I EEEEEEEEEEEEJ rJJJJJJJJJJE I I I I I ~-, r-~ I I L l_l;l~-~~------~- ~- ~ -~------1§~- ~~--' LOAD/ UNLOAD LANE 22 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN ~)> ~::a ~m tjz ~)> z -l m z )> z n m /\: )> z (}) )> (}) m X u 0 (} m z ---l ;;o m 3:: )> (}) ---l m ;;o u I )> z z <( __j 0.... 0:: w 1-- (f) <( 2: w 0:: 1--z w u 0 0.... X w (f) <( (f)z <( ::::{ w u z <( z w f z SITE PLAN OVERVIEW The recommended master plan evolved primarily around the two existing drive lane curbs cuts on the north and south end addition of a new covered multi-purpose equestrian/livestock of the existing Equine/Livestock complex. The siting of the arena, an indoor multi-use stalling and expo building and new multi-use stall barn next to Landon Arena will provide improvements to the public experience at Landon Arena with the necessary vehicle access to all sides of the building and upgrades to the east concourse and entry. reducing the hazards associated with loading and unloading along Western. The new Covered Arena does not require While the new arena and muti-use building are primarily access on all sides, thus is recommended to be in line with conceived for equestrian and livestock events, these facilities Domer and the existing equine/livestock event buildings south are designed for flexibility and able to accommodate a of Domer. multitude of types of events. These new facilities require close connectivity to Landon and Domer arenas to accommodate Connectivity between Landon Arena and the new multi-use multi-building events. 360 degree circulation is required around stalling/expo building is an important consideration for events the multi-use stalling and expo building for event load in and that will utilize both facilities. The master plan indicates a new out. The siting of the two buildings also took into account outdoor plaza space that will extend along the east side of the need to preserve land/ parking area on the landlocked Landon across the front of the new multi-use building . This site and to minimize impact to the current road and parking plaza is formed by reconfiguring the existing drop-off lane in configurations at the site. front of Landon and reconfiguring the site circulation roads around the new multi-use building . The drive lane between the Topography of the site had a significant impact on the new multi-use building and Landon is designed to allow full planning. The site is sloping to the west and south toward the circulation around the multi-use building or it can be closed to Shunga Creek and the majority of available land for expansion vehicular circulation and utilized as an extension of the plaza is designated as a flood plain or flood way. Construction is space. The outdoor plaza space will have utility connections allowed in a flood plain if the building floors are elevated above for food trucks or other expo vendors providing flexibility for the flood plain elevation however no construction is allowed use as an outdoor exhibit or event space. in the areas designated as flood way. Thus, keeping the new buildings close to Landon and Domer is not only critical for Parking and RV spaces lost to the construction of the new event function but also a federal (FEMA) requirement for site multi-use stal ling and expo building and the new covered arena development. will be replaced at the south end of the site. The new multi use RV and car parking area is designed to be enclosed with Safety was a noted concern by many of the equestrian/ a security fence and will accommodate secure camping area livestock stakeholders. A significant traffic/circulation conflict for up to 56 large RV's or it can be used to park a combination exists along Western Avenue at the existing stall barn where of 124 cars and 26 RV's. Additional parking expansion may be event participants must pull in and out of the public street for considered however most available land outside . of that already parking trailers and loading/unloading tack, gear, and animals proposed for parking is located within the flood way and will into the existing stall barn. To mitigate the risk of circulation require additional study prior to approval for development. confl icts and collision along Western the Design Team has Restoration and re -striping of the existing parking lots is recommended converting the current back-in parking along expected to yield a significant number of additional parking the west side of the existing stall barn, covered arena, and spaces as current parking is very inefficient due primarily to a Domer arena to a pair of one way drive lanes. The lane closest lack of striping in the lots. to the buildings will be used as a pull-off lane for loading and unloading while the lane near Western will be a drive through lane. These new drive lanes w ill be separated from western with a partition that will limit site access onto Western to the 9 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDED SITE PLAN SITE PLAN t G ~ NEW COVEREDARENA DOM ER ARENA WARM UP ARENA STALL BARN 280'x130' RENOVATION RENOVATION RENOVATION RV PARKING - 56 SPACES IIHIIf~ltl ,lt~l.LI,H~ltlHt LANDON ARENA EXPO HALL RENOVATION RENO VATION 0 ' -- ~,~·~ \ G SW TOPEKA BLVD \ 10 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN FLOOD MAP SITE PLAN SITE PLAN ( t G ~ 1 ------,l~n~A~n~/TII~Nrri~I\~A~nni>A~N~o~------ NEW COVERED ARENA EXISTING DOMER ARENA WARM UP ARENA STALL BARN BLDG 2BO'x130' RENOVATION RENOVATION RENOVATION GRAVEL SERVICE YARD LANDON ARENA EXPO HALL RENOVATION RENOVATION G 0 c:J[ <~ 11 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN ~::c sn~m ~0 ~3: z3: ~m ~z ~c ~mc en --1 ,m r )> z A )> z (J) )> (J) m X u 0 () m z -j :::0 m :s: )> (J) -j m :::0 u I )> z LANDON ARENA AND EXPO RENOVATIONS The renovations and additions at Landon arena are primarily focused on improving the public experience and upgrading to meet the expectations of modern arena venues. A new entry on the NE corner will improve entry and ticket window access as well as provide indoor access to the main arena concourse via stairs and escalators. Improved amenities within the arena will include additional concessions with expanded offerings, new bar and new loge seating . . New seating will be provided throughout the upper and lower deck. New and upgraded AV including center hung scoreboa rd, ribbon boards, and impro ved sound system will enhance the event experience. Additional locker rooms will be provided as we ll as renovation of the existing locker rooms required by many large sport events. Differed maintenance wi ll upgrade building systems such as select lighting and HVAC systems to be more energy efficient. The seals on the existing exterior metal skin has failed and upgrades will include wrapping the building with a new fa<;::ade providing a community demanded face lift. Renovations within Expo hall wi ll entail restroom upgrades and interior finish improvements. 14 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDED FACILITY PLANS ARENA & EXPO GROUND LEV EL FLOOR PLAN G N NEW PROJECTS D NORTHEAST LOBBY CONNECTI ON / -ENTRY LOBBY I 1, <, -GROUND LEV EL EXPA NSION :- -STA IR & ESCALATOR G FAM.RR J' D EXISTING LOCKER ROOM REN OVATI ON , I D NEW LOCKER ROOMS GUEST/ PERFORMERS LOUNGE D TOILET RENOVATION :-I 1 I D GUEST/ PERFO RMERS LOUNGE REN OVATI ON SOUND SYSTEM EXPO HALL INTERIOR PA INT W I-FI UPGRADES LANDON ARENA EXTERIOR SIGNAGE/ WAYFIND ING POINT OF SALE UPGRAD E IN EXPO 0. UPGRADE SECURITY SYSTEM NEW LO { _m''/ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE I' D A DDED TOILET FIXTURES .---, ·/ ADDITIONAL ELEVATOR UPGRADES B RESTROOMS ~ ·.\. .'1--" A DA ACCESS EXISTING TICKETS , I ENERGY EFFICIENT LI GHTING ARENA EMERGENCY GENERATOR HVAC ROOFTOP UNITS + CHILLER ' NE LOBBY EXPANDED STORAGE - Jn ------l_=------==--~-===-=--==---=-=-=~=-~!II E~SC~A~L~A~TO~R~==~Ic: ~~IA 15 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLA N RECOMMENDED FACILITY PLANS ARENA & EXPO MAIN CONCOURSE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN G N ( v~ NEW PROJECTS D NORTHEAST LOBBY CONNECTION -ENTRY LOBBY ~ 0 -NEW CONCESSIONS -STA IR & ESCALATOR D CONCESSIONS -EQUIPMENT UPGRADE -RE-BRA NDING \. D NEW PANTRY D PRODUCTION OFFI CE REN OVATION D TOILET RENOVATION EXPO HALL II CENTER VIDEO BOARD D LOGE PREMIUM SEATING CENTER VIDEO BOARD r--1 END ZONE BAR ADA SEATING ACOUSTICS -ACOUSTIC BANNERS & WALL TREATMENT SOUND SYSTEM LANDON ARENA INTERIOR PAINT WI -FI UPGRAD ES DEFERRED MAINTENANCE OPEN TO BELOW D SEAT REPLACEMENT -UPPER & LOW ER SEATIN G DECKS D ADD ED TOILET FI XTURES D ADA ACCESS -W HEELCHA IR SEATING -W HEELCHAIR PLATFORMS LIGHTING OPEN TO BELOW ELEVATED PLAZA (NE ENTRY) RESTROOM 16 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN DOMER/ EQUINE COMPLEX RENOVATIONS Unbeknownst to many, the Kansas Expocentre is a regional replacement led to the determination that significant renovations destination for livestock and equestrian shows and events; to the comple x is the best course of action . Renovations projects hosting approximately 60 events each year and drawing nearly wil l focus on refreshing the materials and finishes in areas such as 40,000 attendees annually to Topeka for such events. Events the cafe. show office, and restrooms and improving functionality once held here have out grown the current facilities and have and multi-use flexibility of the buildings . Proposed renovations moved on to larger venues in other cities and states. One impetus include removing the partition wall that divides Domer from the for improvements is realizing how the Expoc entre can re-attract covered arena to create one contiguous d irt floor event space former events, ensure current events remain, and attract new with full circu lation on all sides. The open east side of the covered events to Shawnee County. arena will be enclosed to create a contiguous indoor comp lex from Domer through the sta ll barn. The stall barn floor ing is proposed The primary facilities for equestrian and livestock events are Domer to be replaced with asphalt and a new orientation for the stalls is arena, a covered arena and a 240 stall barn along the west edge re commended. To achieve and support the new stall organization of the campus. Larger events and related floor shows will utilize the wash stalls will be removed and rebuilt as a lean-to stru cture on Landon arena as well as Expo hall. the east side of the barn and at least one additional ramp installed to improve load-in and out access for events. Parking along the Improvements of these facilities initially looked at full replacement east side of the complex will be removed and replaced with a with new expanded facilities but the balanced approach to drive lane and pu ll-off loading lane to eliminate traffic conflicts on the overall master plan focuses on critica l renovations to these Western and help improve load-in and out of the facil ity during facilities with the addition of a new multi-purpose stall barn and events. A new sidewalk is proposed along the west wall of the new covered arena and strengthening safe connections between facility to be used for load-in and out directly adjacent to the facilities. The renovations will focus on correc ting critical structural proposed unloading lane. A primary goal of the renovation for issues, refreshing finishes throughout to bring them up to the this comp lex is to provide a similar standard of finish and event same level as the new facilities and addressing event functionality flexibility in the existing comp lex as wi ll be designed for the new needs. From the standpoint of event functionality, the wall multi-use stalling/expo building . between Domer and the warm up arena w ill be removed providing a larger contiguous dirt floor. The current covered arena will be full enclosed on the side walls. Access into these facilities will be improved with the addition of a new ramp and the orientation of the stall barn will be modified to promote a more functional use. Wash stalls will be relocated to facility greater functionality within the stall barn. Improving participant safety was a repeated issue raised during stakeholder engagement. Much of these issues deal with the proximity and interaction participants, animals and equipment have with Western Street that borders the west edge of the Expocentre campus . During large and small events, congestion on site and on adjacent roadways poses safety threats to patrons. Through a change in policy and minor site modifications the areas west of the barns will be utilized for loading and pull though areas verses parking. Replacement of all or portions of the existing Domer, covered arena, and stall barn complex was considered however the serviceable condition of the existing facilities and the cost of 17 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDED FACILITY PLANS RENOVATED DOMER , WARM UP, & EXISTING STALL BARN GN ,------1 15' DRIVE THRU LANE 15' 15' PULL OFF LOAD/ UNLOAD LANE 8' WIDE SIDEWALK -~-. 1 '__L__ t RAMP . I JJ m 3: 0 ARENA WARM UP ARENA . . I I I . ___l___ EXTEND c9NCOURSE OFFICE/ STORAGE ENCLOSE WARM UP NEW - RR RENOVATION RAMP--- RAMP NEW PROJECTS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PAGING/ SOUND SYSTEM RENOVATI ON -DORMER. WARM UP, AND EXISTING STALL BARN COVERED CONNECTOR -DORMER TO NEW ARENA ARENA/STALL BARN FOUNDATION WALL -DORMER TO NEW STALL BARN -WATERPROOFING & DRAINAGE STRUCTURAL STE EL REPAIR UPGRADE SECURITY SYSTEM 18 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN NEW COVERED ARENA The multi-use stalling I expo facility will increase the stalling capacity to host larger equestrian and livestock events at the Expocentre. To accommodate these larger events another dirt floor arena wit h a 130'x280' event floor and attached covered staging/viewing area will be provided. Design will explore options to enclose or plan for future enclosure of this arena. The proposed arena is located south of existing Domer Arena and a covered connector is planned that w ill allow event participants to access both Domer and the proposed new multi-use stalling/expo buildings under cover. The primary use for this arena is anticipated to be equestrian and livestock events so the event floor footing and railings will be designed to the standards found in similar modern venues. 19 KANSAS EXPOCENTRE I MASTER PLAN