Supplementary Information the Genetic Structure of the World’S First Farmers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supplementary Information the Genetic Structure of the World’S First Farmers Supplementary Information The genetic structure of the world’s first farmers Table of Contents 1 SI 1 – Description of ancient samples and archaeological context 2-11 SI 2 – Human Origins dataset 12-13 SI 3 – Population groupings in the ancient Near East 14-16 SI 4 – Pervasive Basal Eurasian ancestry in the ancient Near East 17-44 SI 5 – Ancient Near Easterners had less Neanderthal ancestry than ancient Europeans 45-50 SI 6 – Y-chromosome haplogroup variation in the ancient Near East 51-58 SI 7 – Admixture history of ancient West Eurasians 59-112 SI 8 – Population admixture into Eastern Africans from the Levantine Neolithic 113-120 SI 9 – Constraints on the origins of Ancestral North Indians 121-128 SI 10 – Modeling admixture from ghost Populations 129-138 SI 11 – Admixture in East Asians and Eastern European hunter-gatherers 139-152 Supplementary Information 1 Description of ancient samples and archaeological context This note presents information on the archaeological context of 45 individuals from the ancient Near East for whom we report genome-wide data in this study. We give uncalibrated dates in radiocarbon years (“bp”). We give calibrated dates in years before the common era, converting from uncalibrated to calibrated dates using IntCal131 and OxCal4.22 (https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/oxcal/OxCal.html). We indicate dates obtained directly on the skeleton for which we obtained ancient DNA by the suffix “calBCE”. We indicate indirect dates obtained based on archaeological context as “BCE”. Iran Hotu Cave (Iran) Hotu Cave is located in the foothills of the Alborz Mountains, near the modern town of Behshahr on the southern shore of the Caspian Sea in northern Iran. The site was excavated to a depth of 12 meters by the American physical anthropologist Carleton Coon in the spring of 1951, and provides evidence of human occupation at various times from the early Mesolithic to the post-Achaemenid periods3-5. Skeletal remains of three sets of individuals (I, II, III) were recovered from Pleistocene Gravel 4 of Trench D, the deepest sounding undertaken (Section 2)3. In Coon’s preliminary excavation report, this gravel was initially identified as an aceramic Neolithic level, but was subsequently reclassified as a Mesolithic horizon.1,2,3 In 1955, two charcoal samples recovered in association with the skeletal remains from depths of 9.5 and 10.15 meters yielded uncalibrated radiocarbon ages of 9190±590 bp and 9270±570 bp respectively6. In 2013, AMS analyses of collagen extracted from a tooth from Mesolithic skeleton I yielded an uncalibrated radiocarbon age of 9480±40 bp (9119-8637 calBCE)7. The set III of individuals includes one adult partially complete skeleton (HotuIIIa) and the remains of a young child estimated to be 1.5-2 years old (HotuIIIb). We sampled the right petrous bone of HotuIIIb for DNA analysis. Subsequent AMS analysis of this specimen yielded an uncalibrated radiocarbon age of 7250 ± 40 bp (6218-6034 calBCE). The discrepancy in the direct dates of skeletal remains (Hotu I and IIIb) recovered from such close proximity to one another in the same archaeological horizon causes us to doubt the age of the Hotu IIIb specimen. There are no stratigraphic unconformities indicating that this specimen may have been introduced from overlying Neolithic cave deposits, and we suspect that the later than anticipated date may result from the use of modern-day organic materials such as the shellac or glue in post-excavation reconstruction of the Hotu IIIb crania. Genetic similarities between the CHG and Hotu IIIb specimens demonstrate that there are continuities between Iranian Neolithic 2 populations and local hunter-gatherer groups in northern Iran and the Caucasus, rather than with Epipalaeolithic or Neolithic populations originating in Anatolia or the Levant. The earlier date (9119- 8637 BCE)8 obtained from the Hotu I skeleton is not essential to support this observation, as the continuity of Iran Neolithic with hunter-gatherers of the southern Caucasus/Iran highlands rather than with those of the Levant is evident when either the HotuIIIb specimen or the securely dated pre- Neolithic Caucasus hunter-gatherers8 from Georgia are used (main text). We show a conservatively wide range that includes both the earliest date from Hotu I and the later direct date from HotuIIIb in Fig. 1a, although based on the arguments made here we strongly favor the earlier date and Mesolithic attribution of the HotuIIIb individual. • HotuIIIb (I1293): 1.5-2 year old individual. Ganj Dareh (Iran) Tepe Ganj Dareh is a mound on the floor of the Gamas-Ab Valley, and is situated at an altitude of ~1,400 meters in the High Zagros region of Kermanshah Province in western Iran. It is one of several mounds discovered during survey work in the area9. It measures about 40 meters in diameter and 7 to 8 meters in height and has five identified levels (A to E), with the lowest level E being the oldest. Permanent architecture is seen earliest at level D. Philip E. L. Smith led an excavation of roughly 20% of the mound in four seasons between 1967 and 1974. Zooarchaeological and archaeobotanical evidence show a population exploiting ovicaprids, with goats dominant, as well as evidence for use of wild barley but no plant domesticates. There is evidence of herding but no evidence for decreased size or changes in horn core morphology10,11. Current evidence places the occupation of the site at approximately 8000-7700 calBCE11. None of the human remains have been directly dated. The human remains are highly fragmentary. The current minimum number of individual is 116, of which 56 are catalogued as skeletons each represented by more than 4 elements12. The following six Ganj Dareh individuals (all petrous bone samples) are included in this study. None has a direct radiocarbon date: • GD13A (I1290): 30-50 year-old male from level C. • GD14B (I1944): 3-4 year-old child from level B1. • GD16 (I1945): 5.5-7.5 year-old child from level D. • GD37 (I1949): 30-50 year-old male from levels D/E. • GD39 (I1951): 1.5-2.5 year-old child from level D crypt. • GD1150 (I1955): 18-30 year-old male from levels A/D. This individual is a clear genetic outlier and was analyzed separately from the other individuals pending radiocarbon dating, which confirmed that it was not from the Neolithic period but of recent origin (1430-1485 calCE (330±30 BP, Beta- 432801); it is thus labeled Iran_recent. 3 Seh Gabi (Iran) The site of Seh Gabi is a series of seven small mounds, identified as A through G, on a branch of the Gamas Ab River in the Kangavar Valley of the High Zagros region of Kermanshah Province, western Iran, about 6 kilometers from the much larger Chalcolithic and Bronze Age site of Godin Tepe. The mounds were scattered over an area of ~15 hectares with four excavated by Louis D. Levine and the Royal Ontario Museum between 1971 and 1973. Occupation lasted from the Late Neolithic through the Chalcolithic periods13. The human material, recovered in 1971 and 1973, comprises a minimum of 31 individuals that are almost entirely subadults: fetuses, infants and children <4 years of age; many with evidence of pathology. We report ancient DNA data on six samples (all petrous bones) from Mound A (n=2), Mound B (n=3), and Mound C (n=1). No radiocarbon dates have been obtained on Mound A, and so we use archaeological dates for the Chalcolithic of 4500-3500 BCE. Radiocarbon dates have been obtained from Mound B although not on the skeletons for which we report DNA. The dates obtained range from 5630±80 bp (SI-4915) to 5020±70 bp (SI-4910), and hence we represent the dates for samples from this bound by the union of the 95.4% calibrated confidence intervals (4680-3662 calBCEP14,15). We directly dated the Mound C individual who is Late Neolithic: • SG19 (I1665): fetal remains, ~26 weeks old from Mound A. • SG21 (I1674): fetal remains, ~35 weeks old from Mound A. • SG7 (I1662): fetal remains, ~34 weeks old from Mound B. • SG11 (I1670): ~6 month-old infant from Mound B. • SG16 (I1661): ~9 months old infant from Mound B. • SG2 (I1671): 5837-5659 calBCE (OxA-33168, 6850±40 bp). ~6 month-old infant from Mound C. Levant Raqefet Cave (Israel) Raqefet Cave is located within a southern extension of Mt. Carmel. It has a long prehistoric sequence spanning the Middle Palaeolithic through to the Neolithic periods16. The first excavation was led by Noy and Higgs (1970-1972), and the most recent excavation was led by Nadel and Lengyel (2004- 2011). The first chamber was used extensively by the Natufians, who left on the terrace 100 bedrock mortars, cupmarks and cupules17. Some of the mortars are among the largest ever recorded for Natufian sites18, and one of the deepest has a grid-like pattern incised inside the shaft19. The samples we analyze for ancient DNA (all of which are petrous bones) were found in single or double primary burials lying on their back or on their side in flexed positions. These are part of a cluster of Natufian graves created within a short time span in a dedicated area of the first chamber of the cave. The area 4 contains approximately 30 human skeletons, all but one of which are in an area of about 15 meters squared. Faunal analysis indicates feasting by the open graves and the burial of food remains within the graves20. Phytolith analysis indicates the use of plant materials in the graves and in the mortars21. In four graves, the pit was lined with greens and flowers prior to inhumation, as reflected by dozens of plant impressions in each22.
Recommended publications
  • Raqefet Cave: the 2006 Excavation Season
    JournalTHE LATE of The NATUFIAN Israel Prehistoric AT RAQEFET Society CAVE 38 (2008), 59-131 59 The Late Natufian at Raqefet Cave: The 2006 Excavation Season DANI NADEL1 GYORGY LENGYEL1,2 FANNY BOCQUENTIN3 ALEXANDER TSATSKIN1 DANNY ROSENBERG1 REUVEN YESHURUN1 GUY BAR-OZ1 DANIELLA E. BAR-YOSEF MAYER4 RON BEERI1 LAURENCE CONYERS5 SAGI FILIN6 ISRAEL HERSHKOVITZ7 ALDONA KURZAWSKA8 LIOR WEISSBROD1 1 Zinman Institute of Archaeology, the University of Haifa, 31905 Mt. Carmel, Israel 2 Faculty of Arts, Institute of Historical Sciences, Department of Prehistory and Ancient History. University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc, Miskolc-Egyetemvros, Hungary 3 UMR 7041 du CNRS, Ethnologie Préhistorique, 21 Allée de l’Université, F-92023 Nanterre Cedex, France 4 Department of Maritime Civilizations and The Leon Recanati Institute for Maritime Studies, University of Haifa, Israel 5 Department of Anthropology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA 6 Department of Transportation and Geo-Information Engineering, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel 7 Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel 8 Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan Branch, Poland 59 60 NADEL D. et al. ABSTRACT A long season of excavation took place at Raqefet cave during the summer of 2006. In the first chamber we exposed an area rich with Natufian human burials (Locus 1), a large bedrock basin with a burial and two boulder mortars (Locus 2), an in situ Natufian layer (Locus 3), and two areas with rich cemented sediments (tufa) covering the cave floor (Loci 4, 5). The latter indicate that at the time of occupation the Natufian layers covered the entire floor of the first chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • A B S T Ra C T S O F T H E O Ra L and Poster Presentations
    Abstracts of the oral and poster presentations (in alphabetic order) see Addenda, p. 271 11th ICAZ International Conference. Paris, 23-28 August 2010 81 82 11th ICAZ International Conference. Paris, 23-28 August 2010 ABRAMS Grégory1, BONJEAN ABUHELALEH Bellal1, AL NAHAR Maysoon2, Dominique1, Di Modica Kévin1 & PATOU- BERRUTI Gabriele Luigi Francesco, MATHIS Marylène2 CANCELLIERI Emanuele1 & THUN 1, Centre de recherches de la grotte Scladina, 339D Rue Fond des Vaux, 5300 Andenne, HOHENSTEIN Ursula1 Belgique, [email protected]; [email protected] ; [email protected] 2, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Département Préhistoire du Muséum National d’Histoire 1, Department of Biology and Evolution, University of Ferrara, Corso Ercole I d’Este 32, Ferrara Naturelle, 1 Rue René Panhard, 75013 Paris, France, [email protected] (FE: 44100), Italy, [email protected] 2, Department of Archaeology, University of Jordan. Amman 11942 Jordan, maysnahar@gmail. com Les os brûlés de l’ensemble sédimentaire 1A de Scladina (Andenne, Belgique) : apports naturels ou restes de foyer Study of Bone artefacts and use techniques from the Neo- néandertalien ? lithic Jordanian site; Tell Abu Suwwan (PPNB-PN) L’ensemble sédimentaire 1A de la grotte Scladina, daté par 14C entre In this paper we would like to present the experimental study car- 40 et 37.000 B.P., recèle les traces d’une occupation par les Néan- ried out in order to reproduce the bone artifacts coming from the dertaliens qui contient environ 3.500 artefacts lithiques ainsi que Neolithic site Tell Abu Suwwan-Jordan. This experimental project plusieurs milliers de restes fauniques, attribués majoritairement au aims to complete the archaeozoological analysis of the bone arti- Cheval pour les herbivores.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoanthropology Society Meeting Abstracts, Memphis, Tn, 17-18 April 2012
    PALEOANTHROPOLOGY SOCIETY MEETING ABSTRACTS, MEMPHIS, TN, 17-18 APRIL 2012 Paleolithic Foragers of the Hrazdan Gorge, Armenia Daniel Adler, Anthropology, University of Connecticut, USA B. Yeritsyan, Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology & Ethnography, ARMENIA K. Wilkinson, Archaeology, Winchester University, UNITED KINGDOM R. Pinhasi, Archaeology, UC Cork, IRELAND B. Gasparyan, Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology & Ethnography, ARMENIA For more than a century numerous archaeological sites attributed to the Middle Paleolithic have been investigated in the Southern Caucasus, but to date few have been excavated, analyzed, or dated using modern techniques. Thus only a handful of sites provide the contextual data necessary to address evolutionary questions regarding regional hominin adaptations and life-ways. This talk will consider current archaeological research in the Southern Caucasus, specifically that being conducted in the Republic of Armenia. While the relative frequency of well-studied Middle Paleolithic sites in the Southern Caucasus is low, those considered in this talk, Nor Geghi 1 (late Middle Pleistocene) and Lusakert Cave 1 (Upper Pleistocene), span a variety of environmental, temporal, and cultural contexts that provide fragmentary glimpses into what were complex and evolving patterns of subsistence, settlement, and mobility over the last ~200,000 years. While a sample of two sites is too small to attempt a serious reconstruction of Middle Paleolithic life-ways across such a vast and environmentally diverse region, the sites
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient DNA Dataset 2.07.72
    8/27/2021 Ancient DNA Dataset 2.07.72 https://haplogroup.info/ Object‐ID Colloquial‐Skeletal LatitudLongit Sex mtDNA‐comtFARmtDNA‐haplogroup mtDNA‐Haplotree mt‐FT mtree mt‐YFFTDNA‐mt‐Haplotree mt‐Simmt‐S HVS‐I HVS‐II HVS‐NO mt‐SNPs Responsible‐ Y‐DNA Y‐New SNP‐positive SNP‐negative SNP‐dubious NRY Y‐FARY‐Simple YTree Y‐Haplotree‐VY‐Haplotree‐PY‐FTD YFull Y‐YFu ISOGG2019 FTDNA‐Y‐Haplotree Y‐SymY‐Symbol2Responsible‐SNPSNPs AutosomaDamage‐RAssessmenKinship‐Notes Source Method‐Date Date Mean CalBC_top CalBC_bot Age Simplified_Culture Culture_Grouping Label Location SiteID Country Denisova4 FR695060.1 51.4 84.7 M DN1a1 DN1a1 https:/ROOT>HD>DN1>D1a>D1a1 DN L A11914G • C1YFull TMRCA ca. 708,133.1 (549,422.5‐930,979.7) A0000 A0000 A0000 A0000 A0 A0000 PetrbioRxiv2020 84.1–55.2 ka [Douka ‐67700 ‐82150 ‐53250 Adult ma Denisovan Middle Palaeolithic Denisova Cave Russia Denisova8 KT780370.1 51.4 84.7 M DN2 DN2 https:/ROOT>HD>DN2 DN L A11914G • C1YFull TMRCA ca. 706,874.9 (607,187.2‐833,211.4) A0000 A0000‐T A0000‐T A0000‐T A0 A0000 PetrbioRxiv2020 136.4–105.6 ka ‐119050 ‐134450 ‐103650 Adult ma Denisovan Middle Palaeolithic Denisova Cave Russia Spy_final Spy 94a 50.5 4.67 .. ND1b1a1b2* ND1b1a1b2* https:/ROOT>NM>ND>ND1>ND1b>ND1b1>ND1b1a>ND1b1a1>ND1b1a1b>ND1b1a1b2 ND L C6563T * A11YFull TMRCA ca. 369,637.7 (326,137.1‐419,311.0) A000 A000a A000a A000‐T>A000>A000a A0 A000 PetrbioRxiv2020 553719 0.66381 .. PASS (literan/a HajdinjakNature2018 from MeyDirect: 95.4%; IntCal20, OxC39431‐38495 calBCE ‐38972 ‐39431 ‐38495 Neanderthal Late Middle Palaeolithic Spy_Neanderthal.SG Grotte de Spy, Jemeppe‐sur‐Sambre, Namur Belgium El Sidron 1253 FM865409.1 43.4 ‐5.33 ND1b1a* ND1b1a* https:/ROOT>NM>ND>ND1>ND1b>ND1b1>ND1b1a ND L YFull TMRCA ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Inferences on Human Evolutionary History in Southern Arabia and the Levant
    GENETIC INFERENCES ON HUMAN EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY IN SOUTHERN ARABIA AND THE LEVANT By DEVEN N. VYAS A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 © 2017 Deven N. Vyas To my parents, sisters, and nephews and in memory of my grandmother, Ba. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would also like to thank my parents and sisters and the rest of my family for all their love and support. I want to thank my advisor and mentor, Dr. Connie J. Mulligan for all her advice, support, and guidance throughout my graduate career. I would also like to thank my other committee members, Dr. Steven A. Brandt, Dr. John Krigbaum, and Dr. David L. Reed for their input and guidance. I would also like to thank the many former and current postdocs, graduate students, and undergraduate students from the Mulligan lab including Dr. David A. Hughes, Dr. Laurel N. Pearson, Dr. Jacklyn Quinlan, Dr. Aida T. Miró-Herrans, Dr. Tamar E. Carter, Dr. Peter H. Rej, Christopher J. Clukay, Kia C. Fuller, Félicien M. Maisha, and Chu Hsiao for all their advice throughout the years as well as prior lab members Dr. Andrew Kitchen and Dr. Ryan L. Raaum who gave me much advice and guidance from afar. Finally, I would like to express thank the Yemeni people without whose participation none of this research would have been possible. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF OBJECTS ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Pioneer Settlement of Modern Humans in Asia
    Nucleic Acids and Molecular Biology, Vol. 18 Hans-Jürgen Bandelt, Vincent Macaulay, Martin Richards (Eds.) Human Mitochondrial DNA and the Evolution of Homo sapiens © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006 The Pioneer Settlement of Modern Humans in Asia Mait Metspalu (u) · Toomas Kivisild · Hans-Jürgen Bandelt · Martin Richards · Richard Villems Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Tartu University and Estonian Biocentre, Riia 23, Tartu, Estonia [email protected] 1 Introduction Different hypotheses, routes, and the timing of the out-of-Africa migration are the focus of another chapter of this book (Chap. 10). However, in order to dig more deeply into discussions about pioneer settlement of Asia, it is necessary to emphasize here that many recent genetic, archaeological, and anthropological studies have started to favour the Southern Coastal Route (SCR) concept as the main mechanism of the primary settlement of Asia (Lahr and Foley 1994; Quintana-Murci et al. 1999; Stringer 2000; Kivisild et al. 2003, 2004); see also Oppenheimer (2003). The coastal habitat as the medium for humans to penetrate from East Africa to Asia and Australasia was perhaps first envisaged by the evolution- ary geographer Carl Sauer, who considered the populations taking this route as adapted to the ecological niche of the seashore (Sauer 1962). After reach- ing Southwest Asia, modern humans had a choice of two potential routes by which to colonize the rest of Asia. These two were separated by the world’s mightiest mountain system—the Himalayas. The pioneer settlers could con- tinue taking the SCR or they could change their habitat and turn instead to the north, passing through Central Asia and southern Siberia (or via the route that later became known as the Silk Road).
    [Show full text]
  • Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia
    World Heritage papers41 HEADWORLD HERITAGES 4 Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia VOLUME I In support of UNESCO’s 70th Anniversary Celebrations United Nations [ Cultural Organization Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia Nuria Sanz, Editor General Coordinator of HEADS Programme on Human Evolution HEADS 4 VOLUME I Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico. © UNESCO 2015 ISBN 978-92-3-100107-9 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Cover Photos: Top: Hohle Fels excavation. © Harry Vetter bottom (from left to right): Petroglyphs from Sikachi-Alyan rock art site.
    [Show full text]
  • LAMPEA-Doc 2013 – Numéro 26 Vendredi 19 Juillet 2013 [Se Désabonner >>>]
    Laboratoire méditerranéen de Préhistoire (Europe – Afrique) Bibliothèque LAMPEA-Doc 2013 – numéro 26 vendredi 19 juillet 2013 [Se désabonner >>>] Suivez les infos en continu en vous abonnant au fil RSS http://sites.univ-provence.fr/lampea/spip.php?page=backend 1 - Actu - Fouille d'un important habitat néolithique à Vernègues – Cazan (Bouches- du-Rhône) 2 - Appel à candidatures - La Maison des Sciences de l’Homme de Montpellier lance un appel à programmes 3 - Congrès, colloques, réunions - 1839ème Réunion scientifique de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris - Cinquième Rencontre sur la Valorisation et la Préservation du Patrimoine Paléontologique (RV3P5) - 3rd annual meeting of the European Society for the study of Human Evolution (ESHE) 4 - Emplois, bourses, prix - La Ville de Lyon recrute un-e archéologue - Mise au concours d’un poste à Tübingen ... sur la Bourgogne - Mosaïques Archéologie recherche un(e) responsable d'opération néolithicien(ne) - Assistant Ingénieur en Humanités Numériques - Vu sur le site de la Bourse interministérielle des Emplois publics ... - Junior scientist position in luminescence dating (OSL) 5 - Expositions & animations - Randonnées-Découvertes « Sur les chemins de Cro-Magnon » 6 - Acquisitions bibliothèque DomCom/19.07.2013 Ce soir ! Séminaire, conférence La grotte ornée et sépulcrale de Cussac : premier bilan de 4 années de recherche par Jacques Jaubert http://sites.univ-provence.fr/lampea/spip.php?article2313 vendredi 19 juillet à 18 heures 30 Les Eyzies-de-Tayac La semaine prochaine Voir « Les manifestations » http://sites.univ-provence.fr/lampea/spip.php?article630 1 - Actu Fouille d'un important habitat néolithique à Vernègues – Cazan (Bouches-du- Rhône) http://sites.univ-provence.fr/lampea/spip.php?article2319 À Cazan, sur la commune de Vernègues et en bordure de la nationale 7, une fouille archéologique qui a duré trois mois vient de s'achever le 31 mai dernier.
    [Show full text]
  • Projecting Ancient Ancestry in Modern-Day Arabians and Iranians: a Key Role of the Past Exposed Arabo-Persian Gulf on Human Migrations
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.24.432678; this version posted February 25, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Projecting ancient ancestry in modern-day Arabians and Iranians: a key role of the past exposed Arabo-Persian Gulf on human migrations Joana C. Ferreira1,2,3, Farida Alshamali4, Francesco Montinaro5,6, Bruno Cavadas1,2, Antonio Torroni7, Luisa Pereira1,2, Alessandro Raveane7,8, Veronica Fernandes1,2 1 i3S – Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal 2 IPATIMUP – Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal 3 ICBAS – Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal 4 Department of Forensic Sciences and Criminology, Dubai Police General Headquarters, Dubai, United Arab Emirates 5 Department of Biology-Genetics, University of Bari, Bari, 70126, Italy. 6 Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia 7 Department of Biology and Biotechnology “L. Spallanzani”, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy 8 Laboratory of Haematology-Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy Keywords: Arabian Peninsula; Iran; basal Eurasian lineage; ancient and archaic ancestry; out of Africa migration; main human population groups stratification Corresponding author: Veronica Fernandes, [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.24.432678; this version posted February 25, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Upper Palaeolithic Humans in Europe Had Recent Neanderthal Ancestry
    Article Initial Upper Palaeolithic humans in Europe had recent Neanderthal ancestry https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03335-3 Mateja Hajdinjak1,2 ✉, Fabrizio Mafessoni1, Laurits Skov1, Benjamin Vernot1, Alexander Hübner1,3, Qiaomei Fu4, Elena Essel1, Sarah Nagel1, Birgit Nickel1, Julia Richter1, Received: 7 July 2020 Oana Teodora Moldovan5,6, Silviu Constantin7,8, Elena Endarova9, Nikolay Zahariev10, Accepted: 5 February 2021 Rosen Spasov10, Frido Welker11,12, Geoff M. Smith11, Virginie Sinet-Mathiot11, Lindsey Paskulin13, Helen Fewlass11, Sahra Talamo11,14, Zeljko Rezek11,15, Svoboda Sirakova16, Nikolay Sirakov16, Published online: 7 April 2021 Shannon P. McPherron11, Tsenka Tsanova11, Jean-Jacques Hublin11,17, Benjamin M. Peter1, Open access Matthias Meyer1, Pontus Skoglund2, Janet Kelso1 & Svante Pääbo1 ✉ Check for updates Modern humans appeared in Europe by at least 45,000 years ago1–5, but the extent of their interactions with Neanderthals, who disappeared by about 40,000 years ago6, and their relationship to the broader expansion of modern humans outside Africa are poorly understood. Here we present genome-wide data from three individuals dated to between 45,930 and 42,580 years ago from Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria1,2. They are the earliest Late Pleistocene modern humans known to have been recovered in Europe so far, and were found in association with an Initial Upper Palaeolithic artefact assemblage. Unlike two previously studied individuals of similar ages from Romania7 and Siberia8 who did not contribute detectably to later populations, these individuals are more closely related to present-day and ancient populations in East Asia and the Americas than to later west Eurasian populations. This indicates that they belonged to a modern human migration into Europe that was not previously known from the genetic record, and provides evidence that there was at least some continuity between the earliest modern humans in Europe and later people in Eurasia.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Arabs Are Descendants of the Earliest Split from Ancient Eurasian Populations
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on March 16, 2016 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Indigenous Arabs are descendants of the earliest split from ancient Eurasian populations Juan L. Rodriguez-Flores,1,8 Khalid Fakhro,2,3,8 Francisco Agosto-Perez,1,4 Monica D. Ramstetter,4 Leonardo Arbiza,4 Thomas L. Vincent,1 Amal Robay,3 Joel A. Malek,3 Karsten Suhre,5 Lotfi Chouchane,3 Ramin Badii,6 Ajayeb Al-Nabet Al-Marri,6 Charbel Abi Khalil,3 Mahmoud Zirie,7 Amin Jayyousi,7 Jacqueline Salit,1 Alon Keinan,4 Andrew G. Clark,4 Ronald G. Crystal,1,9 and Jason G. Mezey1,4,9 1Department of Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York 10065, USA; 2Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar; 3Department of Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College–Qatar, Doha, Qatar; 4Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA; 5Bioinformatics Core, Weill Cornell Medical College–Qatar, Doha, Qatar; 6Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; 7Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar An open question in the history of human migration is the identity of the earliest Eurasian populations that have left con- temporary descendants. The Arabian Peninsula was the initial site of the out-of-Africa migrations that occurred between 125,000 and 60,000 yr ago, leading to the hypothesis that the first Eurasian populations were established on the Peninsula and that contemporary indigenous Arabs are direct descendants of these ancient peoples. To assess this hypoth- esis, we sequenced the entire genomes of 104 unrelated natives of the Arabian Peninsula at high coverage, including 56 of indigenous Arab ancestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiocarbon Dating of Human Burials from Raqefet Cave And
    Radiocarbon dating of human burials from Raqefet Cave and contemporaneous Natufian traditions at Mount Carmel Research Omry Barzilai1,2,∗, Noemi Rebollo1,3, Dani Nadel4, Fanny Bocquentin5, Reuven Yeshurun4, György Lengyel6, Gal Bermatov-Paz4 & Elisabetta Boaretto1 The Natufian culture (c. 15–11.5 ka cal BP) marks a pivotal step in the transition Raqefet from hunting and gathering to sedentism and Cave farming in the Near East. Although conven- tionally divided into Early and Late phases, this internal chronology lacks support from reliable absolute dates. This is now addressed by new AMS dating from two neighbouring Natufian sites at Mount Carmel in Israel: Jerusalem Raqefet Cave, conventionally assigned to the Late phase of the Natufian; and el- Wad Terrace, spanning the entire Natufian sequence. Results indicate that these two N 0 km 200 sites were in fact contemporaneous at some point, but with distinct lunate assemblages. Distinguishing between Natufian phases is, therefore, more complex than previously thought; the social implications of diverse but co-existing cultural manifestations must be considered in any future reconstruction of the Natufian. Keywords: Levant, Israel, Raqefet Cave, el-Wad, Natufian 1 Max Planck—Weizmann Center for Integrative Archaeology and Anthropology, D-REAMS Radiocarbon Laboratory, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel 2 Archaeological Research Department, Israel Antiquities Authority, POB 586, Jerusalem, Israel 3 Institute of Geology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria,
    [Show full text]