DOCSLIB.ORG

GNS Science Consultancy Report 2008/XXX

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GNS Science Consultancy Report 2008/XXX Compilation of seismic reflection data from the Tasman Frontier region, southwest Pacific R. Sutherland P. Viskovic F. Bache V. Stagpoole J. Collot P. Rouillard T. Hashimoto R. Hackney K. Higgins N. Rollet M. Patriat W.R. Roest GNS Science Report 2012/01 March 2012 BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE 1Sutherland, R.; 1Viskovic, P.; 1Bache, F.; 1Stagpoole, V.; 2Collot, J.; 3Rouillard, P.; 4Hashimoto, T.; 4Hackney, R.; 4Higgins, K.; 4Rollet, N.; 5Patriat, M.; 5Roest, W.R; 2012. Compilation of seismic reflection data from the Tasman Frontier region, southwest Pacific, GNS Science Report 2012/01. 72 p. 1 GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand 2 Service Géologique de Nouvelle-Calédonie (SGNC), Direction de l’Industrie des Mines et de l’Energie de Nouvelle Calédonie (DIMENC), B.P. 465, 98845 Nouméa, New Caledonia 3 Agence de Développement Economique de la Nouvelle-Calédonie (ADECAL), B.P. 2384, Nouméa, New Caledonia 4 Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia 5 Institut français de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (IFREMER), Géosciences marines, Département Ressources physiques et Ecosystèmes de fond de Mer, Institut Carnot EDROME, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France © Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, 2012 ISSN 1177-2458 ISBN 978-0-478-19879-9 CONTENTS ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... III 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ........................................................................................... 4 3.0 SCOPE AND DESCRIPTION OF DATABASE ........................................................... 6 3.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Scope and Extent ........................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Workflow and Editing................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Naming Convention ..................................................................................................... 7 4.0 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND LICENCE ........................................................... 7 5.0 USER REGISTRATION .............................................................................................. 8 6.0 CONTACT DETAILS OF RELEVANT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES .......................... 8 7.0 UNPUBLISHED SURVEY AND PROCESSING REPORTS ....................................... 9 8.0 PUBLISHED REFERENCES .................................................................................... 12 9.0 FULL LICENCE AGREEMENT ................................................................................ 17 10.0 SURVEY METADATA .............................................................................................. 22 10.1 Zoneco 11 ................................................................................................................. 22 10.2 Zoneco 11 HR ........................................................................................................... 23 10.3 Noucaplac 2 .............................................................................................................. 24 10.4 Zoneco 05 ................................................................................................................. 25 10.5 Austradec I ................................................................................................................ 25 10.6 Austradec II ............................................................................................................... 25 10.7 Austradec III .............................................................................................................. 25 10.8 Austradec IV .............................................................................................................. 26 10.9 MOBIL 72 .................................................................................................................. 26 10.10 WNC .......................................................................................................................... 26 10.11 Gulfrex ....................................................................................................................... 26 10.12 S206 .......................................................................................................................... 26 10.13 P703-P704 ................................................................................................................ 27 10.14 SO-36a ...................................................................................................................... 28 10.15 46............................................................................................................................... 29 10.16 114............................................................................................................................. 30 10.17 S177 .......................................................................................................................... 31 10.18 232............................................................................................................................. 32 10.19 302............................................................................................................................. 33 10.20 AR89.......................................................................................................................... 34 10.21 HF .............................................................................................................................. 35 10.22 S107 .......................................................................................................................... 36 GNS Science Report 2012/01 i 10.23 81b............................................................................................................................. 37 10.24 81sy ........................................................................................................................... 38 10.25 AR90.......................................................................................................................... 39 10.26 DTB-01 ...................................................................................................................... 40 10.27 STRAT09 ................................................................................................................... 41 10.28 REI09 ........................................................................................................................ 42 10.29 CNL95a ..................................................................................................................... 43 10.30 CNL98 ....................................................................................................................... 44 10.31 NZ .............................................................................................................................. 45 10.32 GS82 ......................................................................................................................... 46 10.33 Sight96 ...................................................................................................................... 47 10.34 LHRNR ...................................................................................................................... 48 10.35 MOHO ....................................................................................................................... 49 10.36 MOHOA ..................................................................................................................... 50 10.37 TL-01 ......................................................................................................................... 51 10.38 CH89 ......................................................................................................................... 52 10.39 RE93.......................................................................................................................... 53 11.0 LIST OF SEISMIC LINES IN DATABASE ................................................................ 54 12.0 TASMAN FRONTIER SEG-Y DATA ........................................................................ 72 FIGURES Figure 1 Location of the Tasman Frontier with bathymetry, names of physiographic features, and maritime boundaries. The outer limits of the extended continental shelf north of the Three Kings Ridge are subject to delimitation between New Zealand, Australia, Vanuatu and France/New Caledonia. Precise boundary locations should be checked with relevant authorities before future work is undertaken. ..................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Location of seismic lines in the Tasman Frontier database. Also shown are drillhole locations relevant to the database. ................................................................... 3 Figure 3 Example of a line name for data sourced from New Zealand Petroleum and Minerals (NZP&M). ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exploration of New Zealand's Deepwater Frontier * GNS Science
    exploration of New Zealand’s deepwater frontier The New Zealand Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is the 4th largest in the world at about GNS Science Petroleum Research Newsletter 4 million square kilometres or about half the land area of Australia. The Legal Continental February 2008 Shelf claim presently before the United Nations, may add another 1.7 million square kilometres to New Zealand’s jurisdiction. About 30 percent of the EEZ is underlain by sedimentary basins that may be thick enough to generate and trap petroleum. Although introduction small to medium sized discoveries continue to be made in New Zealand, big oil has so far This informal newsletter is produced to tell the eluded the exploration companies. industry about highlights in petroleum-related research at GNS Science. We want to inform Exploration of the New Zealand EEZ has you about research that is going on, and barely started. Deepwater wells will be provide useful information for your operations. drilled in the next few years and encouraging We welcome your opinions and feedback. results would kick start the New Zealand deepwater exploration effort. Research Petroleum research at GNS Science efforts have identified a number of other potential petroleum basins around New Our research programme on New Zealand's Zealand, including the Pegasus Sub-basin, Petroleum Resources receives $2.4M p.a. of basins in the Outer Campbell Plateau, the government funding, through the Foundation of deepwater Solander Basin, the Bellona Basin Research Science and Technology (FRST), between the Challenger Plateau and Lord and is one of the largest research programmes in GNS Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Well Log Interpretation and 3D Reservoir Property Modeling of Maui-B Field, Art Anaki Basin, New Zealand
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations Fall 2017 Well log interpretation and 3D reservoir property modeling of Maui-B field, arT anaki Basin, New Zealand Aziz Mennan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Petroleum Engineering Commons Department: Recommended Citation Mennan, Aziz, "Well log interpretation and 3D reservoir property modeling of Maui-B field, arT anaki Basin, New Zealand" (2017). Masters Theses. 7722. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/7722 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WELL LOG INTERPRETATION AND 3D RESERVOIR PROPERTY MODELING OF THE MAUI-B FIELD, TARANAKI BASIN, NEW ZEALAND by AZIZ MENNAN A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PETROLEUM ENGINEERING 2017 Approved by Dr. Ralph E. Flori, Advisor Dr. Kelly Liu Dr. Mingzhen Wei Copyright 2017 AZIZ MENNAN All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Maui-B is one of the largest hydrocarbon–producing fields in the Taranaki Basin. Many previous works have estimated reservoir volume. This study uses 3D property modeling, which is one of the most powerful tools to characterize lithol- ogy and reservoir fluids distribution through the field. This modeling will help in understanding the reservoir properties and enhancing the production by selecting the best location for future drilling candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Database Airborne Database Studies and Reports Well Data
    VOL. 8, NO. 2 – 2011 GEOSCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINED geoexpro.com EXPLORATION New Zealand’s Ida Tarbell and the Standard Underexplored Oil Company Story Potential HISTORY OF OIL Alaska: The Start of Something Big TECHNOLOGY Is Onshore Exploration Lagging Behind? GEOLOGY GEOPHYSICS RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT Explore the Arctic Seismic database Airborne database Studies and reports Well data Contact TGS for your Arctic needs TGS continues to invest in geoscientific data in the Arctic region. For more information, contact TGS at: [email protected] Geophysical Geological Imaging Products Products Services www.tgsnopec.com Previous issues: www.geoexpro.com Thomas Smith Thomas GEOSCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINED COLUMNS 5 Editorial 30 6 ExPro Update 14 Market Update The Canadian Atlantic basins extend over 3,000 km from southern Nova 16 A Minute to Read Scotia, around Newfoundland to northern Labrador and contain major oil 44 GEO ExPro Profile: Eldad Weiss and gas fields, but remain a true exploration frontier. 52 History of Oil: The Start of Something Big 64 Recent Advances in Technology: Fish are Big Talkers! FEATURES 74 GeoTourism: The Earth’s Oldest Fossils 78 GeoCities: Denver, USA 20 Cover Story: The Submerged Continent of New 80 Exploration Update New Zealand 82 Q&A: Peter Duncan 26 The Standard Oil Story: Part 1 84 Hot Spot: Australian Shale Gas Ida Tarbell, Pioneering Journalist 86 Global Resource Management 30 Newfoundland: The Other North Atlantic 36 SEISMIC FOLDOUT: Gulf of Mexico: The Complete Regional Perspective 42 Geoscientists Without Borders: Making a Humanitarian Difference 48 Indonesia: The Eastern Frontier Eldad Weiss has grown his 58 SEISMIC FOLDOUT: Exploration Opportunities in business from a niche provider the Bonaparte Basin of graphical imaging software to a global provider of E&P 68 Are Onshore Exploration Technologies data management solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Reservoir Characterization Study of the Mckee Formation, Onshore Taranaki Basin, New Zealand
    geosciences Article Integrated Reservoir Characterization Study of the McKee Formation, Onshore Taranaki Basin, New Zealand Swee Poh Dong *, Mohamed R. Shalaby and Md. Aminul Islam Department of Physical and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE 1410, Brunei Darussalam; [email protected] (M.R.S.); [email protected] (M.A.I.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +673-7168953 Received: 10 January 2018; Accepted: 13 March 2018; Published: 21 March 2018 Abstract: The Late Eocene onshore McKee Formation is a producing reservoir rock in Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. An integrated petrophysical, sedimentological, and petrographical study was conducted to evaluate the reservoir characteristics of the McKee sandstone. A petrographic study of the McKee Formation classified the sandstone as arkose based on the Pettijohn classification. Porosity analysis showed predominantly intergranular porosity, as elucidated by the thin section photomicrographs. The good reservoir quality of McKee sandstone was suggested to be the result of the presence of secondary dissolution pores interconnected with the primary intergranular network. Mineral dissolution was found to be the main process that enhanced porosity in all the studied wells. On the other hand, the presence of clay minerals, cementation, and compaction were identified as the main porosity-reducing agents. These features, however, were observed to occur only locally, thus having no major impact on the overall reservoir quality of the McKee Formation. For a more detailed reservoir characterization, well log analysis was also applied in the evaluation of the McKee Formation. The result of the well log analysis showed that the average porosity ranged from 11.8% to 15.9%, with high hydrocarbon saturation ranging from 61.8% to 89.9% and clay volume content ranging from 14.9 to its highest value of 34.5%.
    [Show full text]
  • International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 371 Preliminary Report Tasman Frontier Subduction Initiation and Paleogene Climate
    International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 371 Preliminary Report Tasman Frontier Subduction Initiation and Paleogene Climate 27 July–26 September 2017 Rupert Sutherland, Gerald R. Dickens, Peter Blum, and the Expedition 371 Scientists Publisher’s notes Core samples and the wider set of data from the science program covered in this report are under moratorium and accessible only to Science Party members until 2 February 2019. This publication was prepared by the JOIDES Resolution Science Operator (JRSO) at Texas A&M University (TAMU) as an account of work performed under the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP). Funding for IODP is provided by the following international partners: National Science Foundation (NSF), United States Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), People’s Republic of China Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) Australia-New Zealand IODP Consortium (ANZIC) Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), India Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Brazil Portions of this work may have been published in whole or in part in other IODP documents or publications. Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the participating agencies, TAMU, or Texas A&M Research Foundation. Copyright Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/). Unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction are permitted, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Spatio-Temporal
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Lower Arc Cooling and Metamorphism, Northern Fiordland, New Zealand A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geological Sciences By Samantha Kelly Gebauer May 2016 Copyright by Samantha Kelly Gebauer, 2016 ii The thesis of Samantha Kelly Gebauer is approved by: ______________________________________________ ________________ Dr. Robinson Cecil Date ______________________________________________ ________________ Dr. Harold Stowell Date ______________________________________________ ________________ Dr. Joshua Schwartz, Chair Date California State University, Northridge iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first thank Dr. Joshua Schwartz for his inexhaustible dedication to my project and as well as my success as a graduate student. He has been the best resource I could have asked for during the two years of my master’s degree. I feel fortunate to have been given the opportunities he has given me during my graduate career. Thank you to Dr. Robinson Cecil and Dr. Harold Stowell for serving on my thesis committee and providing me valuable insight and edits for the duration of this thesis project. Thank you to Dr. Elena Miranda, Dr. Doug Yule, Dr. Richard Heermance, Dr. Kathleen Marsaglia, Dr. Keith Klepeis, Dr. Nick Mortimer, Dr. Matt Coble, Dr. Andrew Kylander-Clark, and all the other geoscientists who have helped provide me with preparing samples, running data analyses, processing data, and providing me insights necessary to help in completing this thesis. I want to especially thank my colleague Meghann Decker for all of her advice, support, critiques, humor, and wisdom over the course of our respective Fiordland projects and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • OMV New Zealand Limited and Shell
    PUBLIC VERSION OMV New Zealand Limited Application for Clearance of a Business Acquisition Under Section 66 of the Commerce Act 1986 Proposed Acquisition by OMV New Zealand Limited of Shares in Shell Exploration NZ Limited, Shell Taranaki Limited, Shell New Zealand (2011) Limited, and Energy Infrastructure Limited 15 June 2018 30750909_1.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS Part A: Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 5 The Parties .................................................................................................................. 5 The Transaction .......................................................................................................... 5 Affected Markets ......................................................................................................... 6 Counterfactual ............................................................................................................. 7 Industry Context .......................................................................................................... 8 No Substantial Lessening of Competition in the Natural Gas Market ........................ 8 No Substantial Lessening of Competition in the LPG Market .................................. 11 No Substantial Lessening of Competition in Markets for Other Assets ................... 12 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 13 Part B: The Parties .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Gas Story
    FRONT COVER: A new generation of smart gas meters. AN EDMI Helios residential gas meter currently being trialled in New Zealand by Vector Advanced Metering Services. Below it is a graphic read-out of a day’s consumption from one of the households in the trial, together with other usage data that allows the householder to track consumption patterns and facilitate demand management. These meters are manufactured in Malaysia and are starting to be deployed in Europe. Images courtesy of Vector Advanced Metering Services Message from the Chief Executive Gas Industry Co is pleased to publish the third edition of the New Zealand Gas Story. This Report includes developments in the policy, regulatory and operational framework of the industry since the previous edition in April 2014. Gas remains an essential component of New Zealand’s energy supply. It underpins electricity supply security and is the primary energy for many of New Zealand’s largest industries. A number of these are key exporters and for some gas is the effectively the only competitive energy option for their operations. Gas is also a fuel of choice for over 264,000 residential and small business consumers. The gas sector in New Zealand continued to evolve over the past year. A number of indicators remain positive, but the industry is facing some headwinds: the overall market has grown on the back of a return to full three-train methanol production at Methanex. increased petrochemical demand is offset by a continuing trend towards a gas ‘peaking’ role in electricity generation, with a resulting further reduction in gas use for baseload generation.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEW ZEALAND GAS STORY the State and Performance of the New Zealand Gas Industry
    THE NEW ZEALAND GAS STORY The state and performance of the New Zealand gas industry SIXTH EDITION | DECEMBER 2017 Message from the Chief Executive Gas Industry Co is pleased to publish this sixth edition of the New Zealand Gas Story. It includes developments in the policy, regulatory and operational framework of the industry since the previous edition was published in July 2017. The New Zealand gas industry continues to make a significant contribution to New Zealand’s energy supply and is performing well against Government policy and consumer expectations. However, as Gas Industry Co has been signalling for some time, the role of gas in New Zealand has been changing. This has particularly been driven by three interrelated factors: development of new energy technologies and associated consumer preferences; low upstream investment in a low oil price environment over recent years, with resulting impacts on gas reserves; and developing responses to climate change. The key additional factor which will drive further change is the developing policies of the new Labour- led Coalition Government. Climate change policies included in the new Government’s list of priorities will undoubtedly be a significant influence on upstream and other investment. Coalition agreements provide for introducing a Zero Carbon Act and an independent Climate Commission, based on the recommendations of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, and for gradual inclusion of the agriculture sector in the Emissions Trading Scheme. The Labour/Greens Agreement includes requesting the Climate Commission to plan the transition to 100 percent renewable electricity by 2035 in a normal hydrological year. For the moment, gas contributes around 22 percent of New Zealand’s primary energy, and provides over 277,000 New Zealand homes and businesses with secure and affordable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Engineering (Materials Science) University of Tsukuba, Japan 1989
    An Analysis of Alternative Fuels Promotion: The Case of Synthetic Gasoline Production in New Zealand by Takeshi Sugiyama M. Eng., Science and Engineering (Materials Science) University of Tsukuba, Japan 1989 Submitted to the Department of Materials Science and Engineering in Partial Fulfillmentof the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 1994 C 1994 Takeshi Sugiyama. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Sianature of Author . .. Department of Materials,§Cienceand Engineering May 6 1994 Certified by . A. Dennv Ellerman Executive Director, enter for Energy and Environmental Policy Research f Thesis Advisor Certified by . .. Michael C. Lynch, Cnter for Inte Studfcs ......Thesis Advisor Certified by \. ... ...... Joel P. Clark, Professor of Materials Systems Thesis Reader Accepted by . RiLd de Neufville, Professor of Civil ah Environmental Engineering Chair, Technology and Policy Program Accepted by . ..I . Carl V. Thompson II, Professor of Electronic Materials Chair, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students !WST!TUTF Science I 'AUG 1 8 994 An Analysis of Alternative Fuels Promotion: The Case of Synthetic Gasoline Production in New Zealand by Takeshi Sugiyama Submitted to the Department of Materials Science and Engineering on May 6 1994 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy ABSTRACT During the 1980s, many nations attempted to promote alternative fuels because of energy security concerns incited by the oil crises in the 1970s. Countries which had substantial technical and financial capability promoted synthetic fuels derived from non- oil fossil resources to replace crude oil in conventional energy systems.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003, Dunedin (MP116A)
    GENERAL INFORMATION The 2003 conference has been organised by the Otago Branch of the Geological Society of New Zealand. One-day fieldtrips are being held on Monday 1st December, followed by talks and posters on Tuesday 2nd to Thursday 4th December. Multi-day fieldtrips depart at various times from Thursday evening onward. Venue Apart from the fieldtrips, activity will centre around the University of Otago campus. Talks and workshops will be in the Castle 1, Castle 2 and Burns 2 Lecture Theatres. Posters, and morning and afternoon teas will be held in the adjacent Union Hall. Conference accommodation is at St. Margaret’s College. Social events are being held at St Margaret’s and Knox Colleges and at the Otago Museum. See the inside and outside of the back cover for maps. Scope At publication time, registration stood at 185 with 110 talk and 55 poster abstracts being presented. Presentations have been grouped into Cretaceous, Paleobotany, Paleoenvironments & Stratigraphy, Quaternary Stratigraphy, Petrology, Neotectonics, Physical Volcanology, Paleontology, and General sessions. Seven 30 minute plenary talks and one public talk have been organised. A one day Quaternary workshop (INTIMATE: Integration of Icecore, Marine and Terrestrial Records) is being held on Thursday. The Association of Australasian Palaeontologists is holding a one day workshop on “The Measurement and Origin of Biodiversity” on Friday. Registration Most participants have already registered and paid for the conference and will only need to report to the registration desk to collect their conference packs. At that time, talk presenters will be asked to deposit their Powerpoint CD-ROMs and/or slides.
    [Show full text]
  • International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 371 Preliminary Report Tasman Frontier Subduction Initiation and Paleogene Climate
    International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 371 Preliminary Report Tasman Frontier Subduction Initiation and Paleogene Climate 27 July–26 September 2017 Rupert Sutherland, Gerald R. Dickens, Peter Blum, and the Expedition 371 Scientists Publisher’s notes Core samples and the wider set of data from the science program covered in this report are under moratorium and accessible only to Science Party members until 2 February 2019. This publication was prepared by the JOIDES Resolution Science Operator (JRSO) at Texas A&M University (TAMU) as an account of work performed under the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP). Funding for IODP is provided by the following international partners: National Science Foundation (NSF), United States Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), People’s Republic of China Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) Australia-New Zealand IODP Consortium (ANZIC) Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), India Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Brazil Portions of this work may have been published in whole or in part in other IODP documents or publications. Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the participating agencies, TAMU, or Texas A&M Research Foundation. Copyright Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/). Unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction are permitted, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]