The Extraordinary Phases of Liquid 3He*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Extraordinary Phases of Liquid 3He* The extraordinary phases of liquid 3He* David M. Lee Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Department of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 [S0034-6861(97)00403-0] INTRODUCTION peratures where the thermal de Broglie wavelength be- comes greater than the mean interparticle distance. Modern low-temperature physics began with the liq- A remarkable phase transition was discovered in liq- uefaction of helium by Kamerlingh Onnes (1908) and uid 4He under saturated vapor pressure at 2.17 K. As the discovery of superconductivity (Kamerlingh Onnes, the liquid cooled through this temperature, all boiling 1911) at the University of Leiden in the early part of the ceased and the liquid became perfectly quiescent (At- 20th century. There were really two surprises that came kins, 1959). We now know that this effect occurs because out of this early work. One was that essentially all of the the liquid helium becomes an enormously good heat electrical resistance of metals like mercury, lead, and tin conductor so that thermal inhomogeneities which can abruptly vanished at definite transition temperatures. give rise to bubble nucleation are absent. The specific This was the first evidence for superconductivity. The 4 other surprise was that, in contrast to other known liq- heat vs temperature curve of liquid He was shaped like uids, liquid helium never solidified under its own vapor the Greek letter lambda, characteristic of a second- pressure. Helium is an inert gas, so that the interactions order phase transition at 2.17 K. This temperature is between the helium atoms are very weak; thus the liquid called the lambda point (Atkins, 1959; Keesom and Clu- phase itself is very weakly bound and the normal boiling sius, 1932; Keesom and Keesom, 1932). Below this tem- 4 point (4.2 K) is very low. The small atomic masses and perature, liquid He was found to possess remarkable the weak interaction lead to large-amplitude quantum flow properties as well as the ‘‘super’’ heat transport mechanical zero-point vibrations which do not permit mentioned above. If a small test tube containing the liq- the liquid to freeze into the crystalline state. Only if a uid was raised above the surrounding helium bath, a mo- pressure of at least 25 atmospheres is applied will liquid bile film would form, allowing the liquid to be trans- 4He solidify (Simon, 1934). It is thus possible, in prin- ported up the inner walls, over the top and down the ciple, to study liquid 4He all the way down to the neigh- outer walls, eventually dripping back into the bath and borhood of absolute zero. thereby emptying the test tube. (Daunt and Men- 4 Quantum mechanics is of great importance in deter- delssohn, 1939). Furthermore, liquid He could flow mining the macroscopic properties of liquid 4He. In- freely through the tiniest pores and cracks as shown by deed, liquid helium belongs to a class of fluids known as Kapitza (1938, 1941), who performed a number of inge- quantum fluids, as distinct from classical fluids. In a nious experiments involving flow properties of super- fluid helium. Perhaps the most dramatic manifestation quantum fluid the thermal de Broglie wavelength lT 5 h(2pmkT)21/2 is comparable to, or greater than, the of anomalous flow behavior was the so-called fountain mean interparticle distance. There is then a strong over- effect discovered by Allen and Jones (1938a, 1938b). If a lap between the wave functions of adjacent atoms, so glass tube packed tightly with a powder such as jeweler’s 4 quantum statistics will have important consequences. rouge was partially immersed in a He bath and then 4He atoms contain even numbers of elementary par- heated, a fountain of helium rising high above the level ticles and thus obey Bose-Einstein statistics, which of the surrounding helium bath was produced. A model means that any number of atoms can aggregate in a called the Two-Fluid Model to describe these phenom- single quantum state in the non-interacting particle ap- ena was developed by Landau (1941) and Tisza (1940). 4 proximation. In fact macroscopic numbers of atoms in a According to this model, liquid He below Tl can be quantum fluid can fall into the lowest-energy state even thought of as two interpenetrating fluids, the normal and at finite temperatures. This phenomenon is called Bose- the superfluid components. The latter component is in- Einstein condensation. On the other hand 3He atoms, volved in superflow through pores and cracks and does each of which contains an odd number of elementary not carry entropy. Furthermore, it does not interact with particles, must obey Fermi-Dirac statistics: only one the walls of a vessel containing the fluid in a dissipative atom can occupy a given quantum state. Therefore one fashion. Superimposed on this background superfluid should expect a very large difference between the be- component is the normal component which transports havior of liquid 4He and that of liquid 3He for low tem- heat efficiently and exhibits viscosity, allowing transfer of energy between the liquid and the walls. This latter effect was the basis for the ingenious experiment by An- *The 1996 Nobel Prize in Physics was shared by David M. dronikashvili (1946), who actually measured the normal Lee, Douglas D. Osheroff, and Robert C. Richardson. This fluid density as a function of temperature by studying lecture is the text of Professor Lee’s address on the occasion of the damping of a torsional pendulum, which interacted the award. only with the normal fluid. It was found that the normal Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 69, No. 3, July 1997 0034-6861/97/69(3)/645(21)/$13.15 © 1997 The Nobel Foundation 645 646 David M. Lee: The extraordinary phases of liquid 3He fluid density decreased with decreasing temperature and The major breakthrough in our understanding of su- consequently the superfluid density increased, becoming perconductivity occurred in the late 1950s when dominant at the lowest temperatures. The normal fluid Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer (BCS; 1957) proposed carries heat away from the heat source and is replaced their theory of superconductivity. This theory resulted in by the superfluid component, so we have a countercur- a vast revolution in the field of superconductivity. As rent heat flow. The flow of the superfluid component mentioned earlier, BE particles (bosons) can congregate toward a source of heat is spectacularly manifested in in their ground state at finite temperatures as a result of the fountain effect, mentioned above. BE condensation. This provides the basis for the estab- According to Landau the normal fluid consists of a gas lishment of a superfluid order parameter. (The situation of quantized thermal excitations which include the ordi- is really more complicated and requires that interactions nary longitudinal sound waves (phonons) and short- be taken into account.) For a simple model involving wavelength compact excitations which he named the ro- non-interacting electrons, the conduction electrons in a tons. On the basis of the two-fluid model, it was metal form a sea of FD particles (fermions). At T 5 0 all predicted that heat transport would obey a wave equa- the lowest states are occupied up to the Fermi energy. tion which describes the compressions and rarefactions Because of the Pauli exclusion principle, only one elec- in the phonon/roton ‘‘gas.’’ Such a wave phenomenon tron is allowed in each quantum state, so that macro- was indeed discovered experimentally (Peshkov, 1944) scopic congregation in the ground state is not permis- and was named second sound. sible. The BCS theory overcame this difficulty by The nature of the superfluid background still needed showing that, when a metal became superconducting, to be characterized. Fritz London’s (1954) great contri- the electrons in the metal formed pairs (now known as bution was to note that superfluidity could be viewed as Cooper pairs (Cooper, 1956)), which had some of the quantum behavior on a macroscopic scale associated properties of bosons. These pairs could thus congregate with the Bose-Einstein (BE) condensation. As the tem- into a single ground state (in a loose analogy to BE perature is reduced through the transition temperature, condensation) described by an order parameter which the occupancy of the one-particle ground state becomes does not violate the Pauli principle but which leads to a macroscopic and can be thought of as the BE conden- conducting superfluid of electrons. The wave function sate. The superfluid component in the two-fluid picture describing this ground state was devised by Robert could be roughly identified with this condensate, al- Schrieffer (Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer, 1957). The though strong interactions between the atoms in the liq- partners in a Cooper pair consist of two electrons whose uid modify this picture. In this scheme, the superfluid motion is correlated even though they may be separated atoms are governed by a wave-function-like entity called by distances much larger than the interparticle spacing. the order parameter, as introduced by Ginzburg and In other words, the pairs do not behave like Bose con- Landau (1950) for the case of superconductivity. The densed discrete diatomic molecules. The difference may order parameter c for superfluid 4He is characterized by be understood in terms of modern rock and roll dancing a phase f and an amplitude c0 and is given by c vs ballroom dancing, according to a marvelous analogy if 5c0e where c0 can be roughly thought of as the invented by Schrieffer and discussed by him in a number square root of the density of the superfluid component. of public lectures. In ballroom dancing, the partners The fact that the macroscopic order parameter is also hold tightly to one another in analogy with diatomic described by a definite phase is called broken gauge molecules.
Recommended publications
  • Phase-Transition Phenomena in Colloidal Systems with Attractive and Repulsive Particle Interactions Agienus Vrij," Marcel H
    Faraday Discuss. Chem. SOC.,1990,90, 31-40 Phase-transition Phenomena in Colloidal Systems with Attractive and Repulsive Particle Interactions Agienus Vrij," Marcel H. G. M. Penders, Piet W. ROUW,Cornelis G. de Kruif, Jan K. G. Dhont, Carla Smits and Henk N. W. Lekkerkerker Van't Hof laboratory, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands We discuss certain aspects of phase transitions in colloidal systems with attractive or repulsive particle interactions. The colloidal systems studied are dispersions of spherical particles consisting of an amorphous silica core, coated with a variety of stabilizing layers, in organic solvents. The interaction may be varied from (steeply) repulsive to (deeply) attractive, by an appropri- ate choice of the stabilizing coating, the temperature and the solvent. In systems with an attractive interaction potential, a separation into two liquid- like phases which differ in concentration is observed. The location of the spinodal associated with this demining process is measured with pulse- induced critical light scattering. If the interaction potential is repulsive, crystallization is observed. The rate of formation of crystallites as a function of the concentration of the colloidal particles is studied by means of time- resolved light scattering. Colloidal systems exhibit phase transitions which are also known for molecular/ atomic systems. In systems consisting of spherical Brownian particles, liquid-liquid phase separation and crystallization may occur. Also gel and glass transitions are found. Moreover, in systems containing rod-like Brownian particles, nematic, smectic and crystalline phases are observed. A major advantage for the experimental study of phase equilibria and phase-separation kinetics in colloidal systems over molecular systems is the length- and time-scales that are involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Helium Variable Temperature Research Dewars
    CRYO Variable Temperature Liquid Helium Research Dewars CRYO Variable Temperature Liquid Helium Research Dewars Cryo Industries Variable Temperature Liquid Helium Research Dewars (CN Series) provide soluitions for an extensive variety of low temperature optical and non-optical requirements. There are numerous designs available, including Sample in Flowing Vapor, Sample in Vacuum and Sample in Exchange Gas. Our most popular models features Sample in Flowing Vapor (dynamic exchange gas), where the sample is cooled by insertion into flowing helium gas exiting from the vaporizer (also known as the diffuser or heat exchanger). The samples are top loading and can be quickly changed while operating. The temperature of the sample can be varied from typically less than 1.4 K to room temperature. Liquid helium flows from the reservoir through the adjustable flow valve down to the vaporizer located at the bottom of the sample tube. Applying heat, vaporizes the liquid and raises the gas temperature. This gas enters the sample zone to cool the sample to your selected temperature. Pumping on the sample zone will provide temperatures below 2 K with either sample in vapor or immersed in liquid. No inefficient liquid helium reservoir pumping is required. The system uses enthalpy (heat capacity) of the helium vapor which results in very high power handling, fast temperature change, ultra stable temperatures, ease of use an much more - Super Variable Temperature. Optical ‘cold’ windows are normally epoxy sealed, strain relief mounted into indium sealed mounts or direct indium mounted. Window seals are reliable and fully guaranteed. For experiments where flowing vapor may be undesirable (such as mossbauer or infrared detectors), static exchange gas cooling and sample in vacuum inserts are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Transitions in Quantum Condensed Matter
    Diss. ETH No. 15104 Phase Transitions in Quantum Condensed Matter A dissertation submitted to the SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ZURICH¨ (ETH Zuric¨ h) for the degree of Doctor of Natural Science presented by HANS PETER BUCHLER¨ Dipl. Phys. ETH born December 5, 1973 Swiss citizien accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. J. W. Blatter, examiner Prof. Dr. W. Zwerger, co-examiner PD. Dr. V. B. Geshkenbein, co-examiner 2003 Abstract In this thesis, phase transitions in superconducting metals and ultra-cold atomic gases (Bose-Einstein condensates) are studied. Both systems are examples of quantum condensed matter, where quantum effects operate on a macroscopic level. Their main characteristics are the condensation of a macroscopic number of particles into the same quantum state and their ability to sustain a particle current at a constant velocity without any driving force. Pushing these materials to extreme conditions, such as reducing their dimensionality or enhancing the interactions between the particles, thermal and quantum fluctuations start to play a crucial role and entail a rich phase diagram. It is the subject of this thesis to study some of the most intriguing phase transitions in these systems. Reducing the dimensionality of a superconductor one finds that fluctuations and disorder strongly influence the superconducting transition temperature and eventually drive a superconductor to insulator quantum phase transition. In one-dimensional wires, the fluctuations of Cooper pairs appearing below the mean-field critical temperature Tc0 define a finite resistance via the nucleation of thermally activated phase slips, removing the finite temperature phase tran- sition. Superconductivity possibly survives only at zero temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007-2008 Physics at Brown Newsletter
    Physics at Brown NEWS FOR ALUM N I an D FRIE N DS 2007 ISSUE GREETINGS FROM THE CHAIR - SP RING 2008 elcome to another issue of the Brown Physics newsletter. the rank of Associate Professor with tenure. We also report on WI wrote three years ago, during my first term as the some notable faculty achievements for the past year. department chair--with a committed faculty, dedicated staff, enthusiastic students, supportive administration, and engaged e continue the tradition of highlighting the research of alumni and friends--that the future of physics at Brown looked Wour 2007 Galkin Foundation Fellow on page 2. Also bright. Many things have taken place since then. Here we the effort in enriching our physics instruction continues. Three highlight some of the activities of the past year. new courses are offered this year and proposals for three new physics concentrations are under way. Other noteworthy 007 marked the 50th anniversary of the BCS Theory activities include WiSE, Poster Session, UTRA Awards, 2of Superconductivity. We honored Prof. Leon Resource Center, etc. In addition, community outreach Cooper with a two-day symposium on April remains a priority for the Department with a weekly 12-13. A brief description of this event is open house at Ladd and a greatly expanded five- provided on page 3. year NSF supported GK-12 program. e also report on the establishment hanks to a generous gift from his family, an Wof the Institute for Molecular and TAnthony Houghton Prize will be awarded Nanoscale Innovation, which represents an annually for the best theoretical thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • J. Robert Schrieffer Strange Quantum Numbers in Condensed Matter
    Wednesday, May 1, 2002 3:00 pm APS Auditorium, Building 402, Argonne National Laboratory APS Colloquium home J. Robert Schrieffer Nobel Laureate National High Magnetic Field Laboratory Florida State University, Tallahassee [email protected] http://www.physics.fsu.edu/research/NHMFL.htm Strange Quantum Numbers in Condensed Matter Physics The origin of peculiar quantum numbers in condensed matter physics will be reviewed. The source of spin-charge separation and fractional charge in conducting polymers has to do with solitons in broken symmetry states. For superconductors with an energy gap, which is odd under time reversal, reverse spin-orbital angular momentum pairing occurs. In the fractional quantum Hall effect, quasi particles of fractional charge occur. In superfluid helium 3, a one-way branch of excitations exists if a domain wall occurs in the system. Many of these phenomena occur due to vacuum flow of particles without crossing the excitation of the energy gap. John Robert Schrieffer received his bachelor's degree from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1953 and his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois in 1957. In addition, he holds honorary Doctor of Science degrees from universities in Germany, Switzerland, and Israel, and from the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Cincinnati, and the University of Alabama. Since 1992, Dr. Schrieffer has been a professor of Physics at Florida State University and the University of Florida and the Chief Scientist of the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory. He also holds the FSU Eminent Scholar Chair in Physics. Before moving to Florida in 1991, he served as director for the Institute for Theoretical Physics from 1984-1989 and was the Chancellor's Professor at the University of California in Santa Barbara from 1984-1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    Book of Abstracts 3 Foreword The 23 rd International Conference on Atomic Physics takes place in Ecole Polytechnique, a high level graduate school close to Paris. Following the tradition of ICAP, the conference presents an outstanding programme of invited VSHDNHUVFRYHULQJWKHPRVWUHFHQWVXEMHFWVLQWKH¿HOGRIDWRPLFSK\VLFVVXFKDV Ultracold gases and Bose Einstein condensates, Ultracold Fermi gases, Fundamental atomic tests and measurements, Precision measurements, atomic clocks and interferometers, Quantum information and simulations with atoms and ions, Quantum optics and cavity QED with atoms, Atoms and molecules in optical lattices, From two-body to many-body systems, Ultrafast phenomena and free electron lasers, Beyond atomic physics (biophysics, optomechanics...). The program includes 31 invited talks and 13 ‘hot topic’ talks. This book of abstracts gathers the contributions of these talks and of all posters, organized in three sessions. The proceedings of the conference will be published online in open access by the “European 3K\VLFDO-RXUQDO:HERI&RQIHUHQFHV´KWWSZZZHSMFRQIHUHQFHVRUJ On behalf of the committees, we would like to welcome you in Palaiseau, and to wish you an excit- ing conference. 4 Committees Programme committee Alain Aspect France Michèle Leduc France Hans Bachor Australia Maciej Lewenstein Spain Vanderlei Bagnato Brazil Anne L’Huillier Sweden Victor Balykin Russia Luis Orozco USA Rainer Blatt Austria Jian-Wei Pan China Denise Caldwell USA Hélène Perrin France Gordon Drake Canada Monika Ritsch-Marte Austria Wolfgang Ertmer Germany Sandro Stringari Italy Peter Hannaford Australia Regina de Vivie-Riedle Germany Philippe Grangier France Vladan Vuletic USA Massimo Inguscio Italy Ian Walmsley UK Hidetoshi Katori Japan Jun Ye USA Local organizing committee Philippe Grangier (co-chair) Institut d’Optique - CNRS Michèle Leduc (co-chair) ENS - CNRS Hélène Perrin (co-chair) U.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstration of a Persistent Current in Superfluid Atomic Gas
    Demonstration of a persistent current in superfluid atomic gas One of the most remarkable properties of macroscopic quantum systems is the phenomenon of persistent flow. Current in a loop of superconducting wire will flow essentially forever. In a neutral superfluid, like liquid helium below the lambda point, persistent flow is observed as frictionless circulation in a hollow toroidal container. A Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) of an atomic gas also exhibits superfluid behavior. While a number of experiments have confirmed superfluidity in an atomic gas BEC, persistent flow, which is regarded as the “gold standard” of superfluidity, had not been observed. The main reason for this is that persistent flow is most easily observed in a topology such as a ring or toroid, while past BEC experiments were primarily performed in spheroidal traps. Using a combination of magnetic and optical fields, we were able to create an atomic BEC in a toriodal trap, with the condensate filling the entire ring. Once the BEC was formed in the toroidal trap, we coherently transferred orbital angular momentum of light to the atoms (using a technique we had previously demonstrated) to get them to circulate in the trap. We observed the flow of atoms to persist for a time more than twenty times what was observed for the atoms confined in a spheroidal trap. The flow was observed to persist even when there was a large (80%) thermal fraction present in the toroidal trap. These experiments open the possibility of investigations of the fundamental role of flow in superfluidity and of realizing the atomic equivalent of superconducting circuits and devices such as SQUIDs.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleksei A. Abrikosov 1928–2017
    Aleksei A. Abrikosov 1928–2017 A Biographical Memoir by M. R. Norman ©2018 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. ALEKSEI ALEKSEEVICH ABRIKOSOV June 25, 1928–March 29, 2017 Elected to the NAS, 2000 Shortly after the 2003 announcement that Aleksei Abrikosov had won the Nobel Prize in Physics, a number of colleagues took Alex to lunch at a nearby Italian restau- rant. During lunch, one of the Russian visitors exclaimed that Alex should get a second Nobel Prize, this time in Literature for his famous “AGD” book with Lev Gor’kov and Igor Dzyaloshinskii (Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics.) Somewhat taken aback, I looked closely at this individual and realized that he was deadly serious. Although I could imagine the reaction of the Nobel Literature committee to such a book (for a lay person, perhaps analogous to trying to read Finnegan’s Wake), I had to admit that my own copy of this book is quite dog-eared, having been put to good use over the By M. R. Norman years. In fact, you know you have made it in physics when your book gets a Dover edition. One of the most charming pictures I ever saw was a rare drawing in color that Alexei Tsvelik did (commissioned by Andrei Varlamov for Alex’s 50th birthday) that was proudly displayed in Alex’s home in Lemont, IL. It showed Alex with his fingers raised in a curled fashion as in the habit of medieval Popes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elastic Constants of a Nematic Liquid Crystal
    The Elastic Constants of a Nematic Liquid Crystal Hans Gruler Gordon McKay Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 02138, U.S.A. (Z. Naturforsch. 30 a, 230-234 [1975] ; received November 4, 1974) The elastic constants of a nematic liquid and of a solid crystal were derived by comparing the Gibbs free energy with the elastic energy. The expressions for the elastic constants of the nematic and the solid crystal are isomorphic: k oc | D | /1. In the nematic phase | D | and I are the mean field energy and the molecular length. In the solid crystal, | D | and I correspond to the curvature of the potential and to the lattice constant, respectively. The measured nematic elastic constants show the predicted I dependence. 1. Introduction The mean field of the nematic phase was first derived by Maier and Saupe 3: The symmetry of a crystal determines the number D(0,P2) = -(A/Vn2)P2-P2±... (2) of non-vanishing elastic constants. In a nematic liquid crystal which is a uniaxial crystal, we find five 0 is the angle between the length axis of one mole- elastic constants but only three describe bulk pro- cule and the direction of the preferred axis (optical perties 2. Here we calculate the magnitude of these axis). P2 is the second Legendre polynomial and three elastic constants by determining the elastic P2 is one order parameter given by the distribution function f{0): energy density in two different ways. On the one hand the elastic energy density can be expressed by the elastic constants and the curvature of the optical p2 = Tf (@) Po sin e d e/tf (&) sin e d 0 .
    [Show full text]
  • Contents 1 Classification of Phase Transitions
    PHY304 - Statistical Mechanics Spring Semester 2021 Dr. Anosh Joseph, IISER Mohali LECTURE 35 Monday, April 5, 2021 (Note: This is an online lecture due to COVID-19 interruption.) Contents 1 Classification of Phase Transitions 1 1.1 Order Parameter . .2 2 Critical Exponents 5 1 Classification of Phase Transitions The physics of phase transitions is a young research field of statistical physics. Let us summarize the knowledge we gained from thermodynamics regarding phases. The Gibbs’ phase rule is F = K + 2 − P; (1) with F denoting the number of intensive variables, K the number of particle species (chemical components), and P the number of phases. Consider a closed pot containing a vapor. With K = 1 we need 3 (= K + 2) extensive variables say, S; V; N for a complete description of the system. One of these say, V determines only size of the system. The intensive properties are completely described by F = 1 + 2 − 1 = 2 (2) intensive variables. For instance, by pressure and temperature. (We could also choose temperature and chemical potential.) The third intensive variable is given by the Gibbs’-Duhem relation X S dT − V dp + Ni dµi = 0: (3) i This relation tells us that the intensive variables PHY304 - Statistical Mechanics Spring Semester 2021 T; p; µ1; ··· ; µK , which are conjugate to the extensive variables S; V; N1; ··· ;NK are not at all independent of each other. In the above relation S; V; N1; ··· ;NK are now functions of the variables T; p; µ1; ··· ; µK , and the Gibbs’-Duhem relation provides the possibility to eliminate one of these variables.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE SANDRO STRINGARI Born in Italy on March
    CURRICULUM VITAE SANDRO STRINGARI Born in Italy on March 2nd, 1949 Married with two daughters. Italian citizenship EDUCATION, MAIN APPOINTMENTS AND AWARDS 1972 Laurea in Physics cum laude at the Università di Pisa and Scuola Normale Superiore 1972/1973 Fellowship at the Scuola Normale Superiore 1973-1976 Research assistant at the Università di Trento 1976 Visiting scientist at the Department of Theoretical Physics, Oxford (6 months) 1976-1980 Assistant professor at the Università di Trento 1978/1979 CNRS visitor at the Institute de Physique Nucleaire, Orsay 1980-1990 Associate professor at the Università di Trento 1985/1986 CNRS visitor at the Institute de Physique Nucleaire, Orsay 1990 Visiting scientist at the Laue-Langevin Institute, Grenoble (1 month) 1990 Full professor at the Università di Trento 2002 M.T. Messori Roncaglia and E. Mari prize of the Accademia dei Lincei 2002 Visiting professor at the Ecole Normale Superieure, Paris (1 month) 2004/2005 European Chair at the College de France, Paris 2007 Visiting professor at the Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris (1 month) 2008 Visiting professor at the Center for Ultracold Atoms, MIT-Harvard (2 months) ORGANIZATION ACTIVITIES (selection) 1992-1995 Chairman of the Physics Department, Università di Trento 1996/1997 Vice-Rector of the Università di Trento 1996-2000 National coordinator of the INFM Project "Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in Alkali Atoms” 2002 Director of the INFM Research and Development BEC Center 2006 Member of the Evaluation Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Transition a Phase Transition Is the Alteration in State of Matter Among the Four Basic Recognized Aggregative States:Solid, Liquid, Gaseous and Plasma
    Phase transition A phase transition is the alteration in state of matter among the four basic recognized aggregative states:solid, liquid, gaseous and plasma. In some cases two or more states of matter can co-exist in equilibrium under a given set of temperature and pressure conditions, as well as external force fields (electromagnetic, gravitational, acoustic). Introduction Matter is known four aggregative states: solid, liquid, and gaseous and plasma, which are sharply different in their properties and characteristics. Physicists have agreed to refer to a both physically and chemically homogeneous finite body as a phase. Or, using Gybbs’s definition, one can call a homogeneous part of heterogeneous system: a phase. The reason behind the existence of different phases lies in the balance between the kinetic (heat) energy of the molecules and their energy of interaction. Simplified, the mechanism of phase transitions can be described as follows. When heating a solid body, the kinetic energy of the molecules grows, distance between them increases, and in accordance with the Coulomb law the interaction between them weakens. When the temperature reaches a certain point for the given substance (mineral, mixture, or system) critical value, melting takes place. A new phase, liquid, is formed, and a phase transition takes place. When further heating the liquid thus formed to the next critical temperature the liquid (melt) changes to gas; and so on. All said phase transitions are reversible; that is, with the temperature being lowered, the system would repeat the complete transition from one state to another in reverse order. The important thing is the possibility of co- existence of phases and their reciprocal transition at any temperature.
    [Show full text]