Remembering Rabin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Remembering Rabin Remembering Rabin Thomas A. Boogaart Since I have returned from a sabbatical year in Israel, many friends have asked me whether I had a "good experience." I do not know how to answer them. It is hard to find adjectives to describe my year. I usually respond by replacing "good" with "full," or "intense," or "tumultuous." This fall on the eve of the Jewish new year (rash hashana), commentators in Israel itself were hard pressed to interpret the past year and to find the right adjectives. Early in my stay Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated, and later the war in Lebanon flared up. I and my family were living on the Christian moshav, Nes Ammim, in Western Galilee about fifteen kilometers from the Lebanese border between Akko and Nahariya. My Son now knows what a Cobra attack helicopter looks like and that an F-16 fighter-jet can outmaneuver anything in the sky. He has seen them perform overhead on their retaliatory raids in Lebanon. Sojourner Our experience of Israel? So much blood, so much history, so much energy, so much hope, so much hatred. Israel is a welter of longing and passion. Conversations in the shuk (bazaar) erupt and spill over the passersby; the Arab woman harvesting herbs along the road leading to Nes Ammin raises her head as I walk by, and her obsidian eyes are so brilliant and intense that I avert my own; the butcher in the grocery store in Nahariya with numbers tattooed on his arm moves sleepily from customer to customer, his body in this world but his soul clearly in another; an Arab friend sinks into depression when we visit a zoo of desert animals in the Negev because he sees in their lethargic captivity a symbol of his own. Living, working, and playing in Israel, I could not help but absorb what was happening all around me . The insistent and labyrinthine relationships put my soul into a state of suspension. I found myself someplace between America and Israel, someplace between Christianity and Judaism. Both my naivete and my wisdom evaporated in the extreme heat. I offered my opinions; I embarrassed myself; I had flashes of insight; I felt my ignorance. My Christian beliefs did not settle easily in this passionate and divided land. My theology and I were sojourners. The conviction that light is more powerful than darkness, that good triumphs in the end, that love is more powerful than hate was especially difficult to maintain here. 85 I had come to Israel with some vague notion that the land of Jesus would somehow enhance the experience of Jesus. I had come as a pilgrim not a tourist, or so I convinced myself. I was not just another middle-class American from West Michigan, looking for a spiritual rush by combining exotic travel and religion. I did not join a gaggle of tourists, donning funny hats, and following an umbrella held high in the hand of a disheveled guide ambling through the streets of Jerusalem. I was looking for the afterglow of glory, the embers of holiness. I was hoping that proximity would have the same effect on me that it had had on Isaiah when he approached the temple. I wanted to see the seraphs and to hear another round of "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts, the whole earth is full of his glory" (Isaiah 6:3). And if the coals on the altar were no longer hot enough to burn my lips, I at least wanted them to warm my hands. Almost without thinking, we call Israel the Holy Land. Yet it is hard to sustain any understanding of the holy in the undifferentiated modern world of here and now and this and that. For too many of us in the late twentieth century, nothing is related to anything else, and therefore everything is amenable to manufacturing and marketing. There are no boundaries in our world and therefore ultimately there is no trespassing. We do not violate any spirits when we cut through a forest, dam a river, tear open the land, or demean a person. The holy presupposes a world of relationships, an intimate world; God is the creator and connected to all that exists. God's Spirit holds everything together and life-giving power is potentially made available to us in such ordinary things as land. If the land of Israel is holy, it is holy in ways I was not prepared to see. I have walked the streets of the city of David, climbed the mountain of Deborah and Barak, seen the sources of the Jordan bursting from the rock, dipped my hand in the sea which Jesus quieted, sat on the hillside where he multiplied the bread and fish, knelt where he hung on the cross, and entered the empty tomb. Yet, I did not experience the holy in any of this. I was more tourist than I now care to admit. I, like so many today who travel to the Holy Land, was impulse buying in a shop of religious curiosities. Not having carefully examined what I needed spiritually, much less what the community I served needed, I bought what I merely wanted. Impulse buying can be a dangerous thing in the Holy Land. As a rabbi lecturing at Nes Ammim warned us, Christians can lose their faith visiting the holy sites, if they do not know what they are looking for. What kind of spiritual experience are you likely to have in the empty tomb of Jesus when you have been fighting to hold your place in line for half an hour and a brown-robed priest allows some dignitary to cut in ahead of you? What kind of spiritual experience are you likely to have beneath the cross of Jesus when a man smirks for the camera with his hand reaching for the black hole in which Jesus' cross was placed? Calvary reduced to a Kodak moment. The black box, which some refer to as a camera, is voracious enough to swallow 86 everything holy in the land. Exploiting these holy sites and fighting to control them have demonstrated the worst side of Christianity since before the Crusades. If the land is holy, it will only yield its particular glory after much digging and careful sifting. In this article, I have reluctantly begun the process of sifting my Israel experiences. I say "reluctantly" because to remember is to resurrect. To remember is to feel again the ambiguity of belonging and not belonging, loving and leaving. I leave it to the reader to assess my opinions, my embarrassments, my insights, and my ignorance. In this article I shall focus on the assassination of Rabin, for his blood overcame my year and more than anything else defined it. The sources for these reflections are news clippings from the Jerusalem Post and the Jerusalem Report, conversations with friends in Israel, and documents made available at Nes Ammim. The Blood-soaked Song of Peace The months leading up to the November 4 peace rally at Kirkar Malkhei Israel (Square of Israel's Kings) in Tel Aviv were difficult ones for Yitzhak Rabin. He had led the Labor party to victory in the June, 1992, elections and the nation toward phased negotiations with the Palestinians. The centerpiece of these negotiations was the principle, "land for peace." In exchange for a Palestinian rejection of violence as a means of diplomacy and recognition of the State of Israel, the government of Rabin agreed to the creation of the "Palestinian Authority," that is, limittd sovereignty in the occupied territories of Gaza and the West Bank. The resistance to negotiations was intense. Some Israelis distrusted the Palestinians. Their fears were forcefully expressed by General Rafael Eytan, "The mentality of those who call themselves Arabs is based on the Koran . The Koran preaches the law of the sword. Infidels have the choice between conversion and death. This is the Koran's definition of peace. Thus, according to the Koran, there can only be peace with a non-Muslim if he becomes a Muslim or if he dies." David Wilder, a community spokesman for the Jewish enclave in Hebron, drew the inevitable conclusion from this understanding of the so-called Arab mentality: "Israel has to make sure it is in as strong a position as possible. The Arab mentality understands strength and takes advantage of weakness." Other Israelis believed the land itself was a non-negotiable gift of God, first promised to Abraham and miraculously restored in the 1967 war. Their feelings were summarized in the words of Rabbi Haim Druckman: "Just as it is forbidden to give up one letter from the Torah, it is forbidden to make concessions on the Land of Israel." In the hearts of many Israelis, fear of the Arab and anxiety over the land hardened into hatred for Rabin. Aharon Domb, spokesman for the Council of Jewish Settlements in Judea, Samaria, and the Gaza District, warned Rabin in a letter written on May 13, 1994, that people were despairing of his policies and 87 plotting violence, "To my sorrow, I have been hearing recently that the one solution ... is assassination . ... We must do all we can to prevent this. We for our part, are doing all we can, but I see it as proper to warn you, and to say that if you continue with your sharp statements you will bear 'indirect responsibility' for such evil action on the part of an individual as an outcome of your policy." On September 13, 1995, Moshe Feiglin, leader of Zo Artzeinu (This is our land) said that his group planned to hold the government responsible "for its crime against security and Judaism." Standing outside Rabin's residence on the eve of Yorn Kippur, a rabbi, whose name was not reported, read out this curse in Aramaic from the practical Kabbalah: "And on him, Yitzhak son of Rosa, known as Rabin we have permission.
Recommended publications
  • Israeli Media Self-Censorship During the Second Lebanon War
    conflict & communication online, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2019 www.cco.regener-online.de ISSN 1618-0747 Sagi Elbaz & Daniel Bar-Tal Voluntary silence: Israeli media self-censorship during the Second Lebanon War Kurzfassung: Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Charakteristika der Selbstzensur im Allgemeinen, und insbesondere in den Massenmedien, im Hinblick auf Erzählungen von politischer Gewalt, einschließlich Motivation und Auswirkungen von Selbstzensur. Es präsentiert zunächst eine breite theoretische Konzeptualisierung der Selbstzensur und konzentriert sich dann auf seine mediale Praxis. Als Fallstudie wurde die Darstellung des Zweiten Libanonkrieges in den israelischen Medien untersucht. Um Selbstzensur als einen der Gründe für die Dominanz hegemonialer Erzählungen in den Medien zu untersuchen, führten die Autoren Inhaltsanalysen und Tiefeninterviews mit ehemaligen und aktuellen Journalisten durch. Die Ergebnisse der Analysen zeigen, dass israelische Journalisten die Selbstzensur weitverbreitet einsetzen, ihre Motivation, sie zu praktizieren, und die Auswirkungen ihrer Anwendung auf die Gesellschaft. Abstract: This article describes the characteristics of self-censorship in general, specifically in mass media, with regard to narratives of political violence, including motivations for and effects of practicing self-censorship. It first presents a broad theoretical conceptualization of self-censorship, and then focuses on its practice in media. The case study examined the representation of The Second Lebanon War in the Israeli national media. The authors carried out content analysis and in-depth interviews with former and current journalists in order to investigate one of the reasons for the dominance of the hegemonic narrative in the media – namely, self-censorship. Indeed, the analysis revealed widespread use of self-censorship by Israeli journalists, their motivations for practicing it, and the effects of its use on the society.
    [Show full text]
  • Yitzhak Rabin
    YITZHAK RABIN: CHRONICLE OF AN ASSASSINATION FORETOLD Last year, architect-turned-filmmaker Amos Gitaï directed Rabin, the Last EN Day, an investigation into the assassination, on November 4, 1995, of the / Israeli Prime Minister, after a demonstration for peace and against violence in Tel-Aviv. The assassination cast a cold and brutal light on a dark and terrifying world—a world that made murder possible, as it suddenly became apparent to a traumatised public. For the Cour d’honneur of the Palais des papes, using the memories of Leah Rabin, the Prime Minister’s widow, as a springboard, Amos GitaI has created a “fable” devoid of formality and carried by an exceptional cast. Seven voices brought together to create a recitative, “halfway between lament and lullaby,” to travel back through History and explore the incredible violence with which the nationalist forces fought the peace project, tearing Israel apart. Seven voices caught “like in an echo chamber,” between image-documents and excerpts from classic and contemporary literature— that bank of memory that has always informed the filmmaker’s understanding of the world. For us, who let the events of this historic story travel through our minds, reality appears as a juxtaposition of fragments carved into our collective memory. AMOS GITAI In 1973, when the Yom Kippur War breaks out, Amos Gitai is an architecture student. The helicopter that carries him and his unit of emergency medics is shot down by a missile, an episode he will allude to years later in Kippur (2000). After the war, he starts directing short films for the Israeli public television, which has now gone out of business.
    [Show full text]
  • The Army and Society Forum the IDF and the PRESS DURING HOSTILITIES
    The Army and Society Forum THE IDF AND THE PRESS DURING HOSTILITIES ��� ������ ������� ������ ��� ������ ��������� ��������� ��� ��� ��� ��� ����� ������ ����������� � ��������� ���� �� � ���� ���� �� ��� ������ ��������� ��������� ��� ���� ��� ������� ����� 5 Editor in Chief: Uri Dromi Administrative Director, Publications Dept.: Edna Granit English Publications Editor: Sari Sapir Translators: Miriam Weed Sari Sapir Editor: Susan Kennedy Production Coordinator: Nadav Shtechman Graphic Designer: Ron Haran Printed in Jerusalem by The Old City Press © 2003 The Israel Democracy Institute All rights reserved. ISBN 965-7091-67-5 Baruch Nevo heads The Army and Society Forum at The Israel Democracy Institute and is Professor of Psychology at Haifa University. Yael Shur is a research assistant at The Israel Democracy Institute. The views in this publication are entirely those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Israel Democracy Institute. 5 Table of Contents PART ONE The IDF and the Press during Hostilities Baruch Nevo and Yael Shur Preface 6 Introduction 7 The Media as a Strategic Consideration in Preparation for War 13 The IDF and the Media: Reciprocal Relations 21 A Research Agenda 35 PART TWO Opening Plenary Session 37 Discussion Groups Group 1: The Media as a Strategic Consideration in Preparation for War 58 Group 2: The IDF's Approach to the Media 88 Group 3: The Media’s Stance towards the IDF 119 Closing Plenary Session 139 Group Reports 151 6 The IDF and the Press during Hostilities 7 PART ONE The IDF and the Press during Hostilities Baruch Nevo and Yael Shur PREFACE The fifth meeting of the Army and Society Forum, held in the summer of 2002, dealt with issues related to the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) and the media in wartime.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp David's Shadow
    Camp David’s Shadow: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinian Question, 1977-1993 Seth Anziska Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 © 2015 Seth Anziska All rights reserved ABSTRACT Camp David’s Shadow: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinian Question, 1977-1993 Seth Anziska This dissertation examines the emergence of the 1978 Camp David Accords and the consequences for Israel, the Palestinians, and the wider Middle East. Utilizing archival sources and oral history interviews from across Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, the United States, and the United Kingdom, Camp David’s Shadow recasts the early history of the peace process. It explains how a comprehensive settlement to the Arab-Israeli conflict with provisions for a resolution of the Palestinian question gave way to the facilitation of bilateral peace between Egypt and Israel. As recently declassified sources reveal, the completion of the Camp David Accords—via intensive American efforts— actually enabled Israeli expansion across the Green Line, undermining the possibility of Palestinian sovereignty in the occupied territories. By examining how both the concept and diplomatic practice of autonomy were utilized to address the Palestinian question, and the implications of the subsequent Israeli and U.S. military intervention in Lebanon, the dissertation explains how and why the Camp David process and its aftermath adversely shaped the prospects of a negotiated settlement between Israelis and Palestinians in the 1990s. In linking the developments of the late 1970s and 1980s with the Madrid Conference and Oslo Accords in the decade that followed, the dissertation charts the role played by American, Middle Eastern, international, and domestic actors in curtailing the possibility of Palestinian self-determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Report Is a Student Publication of Sudan
    To provide greater exposure to primary Israeli news sources and opinions in order to become better informed on the issues, and to gain a better understanding of the wide range of perspectives that exist in Israeli society and politics. Issue 991 • January 29, 2016 • 18 Shevat 5776 ISRAEL SLAMS UN CHIEF'S HYPOCRISY (Israel Hayom 1/27/16) The Ministry of Health in Gaza spokesman denied the reports, claiming no Israeli officials in Jerusalem were infuriated on Tuesday by U.N. Secretary- bodies were brought to the hospital from the tunnel collapse. On Saturday, General Ban Ki-moon's criticism of settlement activities in Judea and the Ministry reported that a Hamas militant was killed in tunnel collapse in Samaria. Khan Yunis. Addressing the U.N. Security Council on Tuesday, Ban said, "As oppressed Hamas has been steadily rebuilding its military terrorist infrastructure since peoples have demonstrated throughout the ages, it is human nature to react since Operation Protective Edge last summer, including the restocking of its to occupation." The U.N. chief called Israeli settlement activities "an affront to rocket arsenal and the digging of attack tunnels, including some that reach the Palestinian people and to the international community. ... They rightly inside Israeli territory. raise questions about Israel's commitment to a two-state solution." It is estimated that since the end of Protective Edge, Hamas has dug dozens At the same Security Council meeting, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. of tunnels of varying lengths. Samantha Power said the U.S. "strongly opposes settlement activity," but she 32 tunnels were dug by the summer of 2014, and according to a senior IDF added that "settlement activity can never in itself be an excuse for violence." source, they were all destroyed completely during the war to the extent that it Later on Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a stinging would be impossible to reconstruct them.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Wars, 1947-93
    Israel’s Wars, 1947–93 Warfare and History General Editor Jeremy Black Professor of History, University of Exeter European warfare, 1660–1815 Jeremy Black The Great War, 1914–18 Spencer C. Tucker Wars of imperial conquest in Africa, 1830–1914 Bruce Vandervort German armies: war and German politics, 1648–1806 Peter H. Wilson Ottoman warfare, 1500–1700 Rhoads Murphey Seapower and naval warfare, 1650–1830 Richard Harding Air power in the age of total war, 1900–60 John Buckley Frontiersmen: warfare in Africa since 1950 Anthony Clayton Western warfare in the age of the Crusades, 1000–1300 John France The Korean War Stanley Sandler European and Native-American warfare, 1675–1815 Armstrong Starkey Vietnam Spencer C. Tucker The War for Independence and the transformation of American society Harry M. Ward Warfare, state and society in the Byzantine world, 565–1204 John Haldon Soviet military system Roger Reese Warfare in Atlantic Africa, 1500–1800 John K. Thornton The Soviet military experience Roger Reese Warfare at sea, 1500–1650 Jan Glete Warfare and society in Europe, 1792–1914 Geoffrey Wawro Israel’s Wars, 1947–93 Ahron Bregman Israel’s Wars, 1947–93 Ahron Bregman London and NewYork First published 2000 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, NewYork, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2001. © 2000 Ahron Bregman All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Political Studies Review
    www.jcpa.org Jewish Political Studies Review Visit our new website: Institute for Global Jewish Affairs Jewish Political Studies Review 13:3-4 (Fall 2001) Citizen Rights in Flux: The Influence of American Immigrants to Israel on Modes of Political Activism Avi Kay Although American-born Israelis are among the smallest immigrant groups in Israel, they have been at the forefront of extra-parliamentary activity in Israel for nearly thirty years. The ubiquitous presence of American-born Israelis in such frameworks is particularly pronounced in extra-parliamentary groups active in the political-security realm. The difficulty these immigrants experience in integrating themselves in the formal Israeli political structure seems to reinforce a basic "activist" political socialization received prior to their arrival in Israel. Through their activities, American-born Israelis have not only introduced new methods to the public debate, but also have helped focus attention on the potential for citizen groups to contribute - if not direct - public debate. Israel is a nation of immigrants. In fact, over 30 percent of the current population of Israel was born abroad.1 Among the smallest immigrant groups in Israel are those individuals who immigrated to Israel from the United States. These American-born Israelis (henceforth referred to as ABIs) number roughly 85,000; or 1.5 percent of the current population of Israel.2 But despite their numerical marginality, ABIs have played a prominent role in the development and operations of extraparliamentary political groups. Indeed, ABIs can be found at the forefront of a wide variety of such groups dealing with civil rights, women's issues, "bridge-building" between religious and secular, election reform, environmental concerns and the peace process and its implications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oslo Disaster Revisited: How It Happened Efraim Karsh
    The Oslo Disaster Revisited: How It Happened Efraim Karsh Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 154 THE BEGIN-SADAT CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 154 The Oslo Disaster Revisited: How It Happened Efraim Karsh The Oslo Disaster Revisited: How It Happened Efraim Karsh © The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gan 5290002 Israel Tel. 972-3-5318959 Fax. 972-3-5359195 [email protected] www.besacenter.org ISSN 0793-1042 September 2018 Cover image: Bill Clinton, Yitzhak Rabin, Yasser Arafat at the White House, September 13, 1993, photo by Vince Musi via Wikimedia Commons The Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies is an independent, non-partisan think tank conducting policy-relevant research on Middle Eastern and global strategic affairs, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel and regional peace and stability. It is named in memory of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, whose efforts in pursuing peace laid the cornerstone for conflict resolution in the Middle East. Mideast Security and Policy Studies serve as a forum for publication or re-publication of research conducted by BESA associates. Publication of a work by BESA signifies that it is deemed worthy of public consideration but does not imply endorsement of the author’s views or conclusions. Colloquia on Strategy and Diplomacy summarize the papers delivered at conferences and seminars held by the Center for the academic, military, official and general publics. In sponsoring these discussions, the BESA Center aims to stimulate public debate on, and consideration of, contending approaches to problems of peace and war in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • 748 B Beis Moshiach
    contents TRUE STRENGTH 4 D’var Malchus | Sichos In English MOSHIACH: BEYOND BROTHERLY 6 LOVE Thought | Rabbi Zvi Homnick WHAT FEIGLIN DOES QUIETLY, WE 9 MUST DO AT FULL VOLUME Shleimus HaAretz | Sholom Ber Crombie A NEW BRAIN FOR THE SUMMER 12 Moshiach & Science | Dr. Aryeh Gotfryd, PhD STRAIGHT TALK ON B’SURAS HA’GEULA 14 Moshiach & Geula | Interview by Menachem Ziegelboim USA 744 Eastern Parkway Brooklyn, NY 11213-3409 Tel: (718) 778-8000 Fax: (718) 778-0800 B’SURAS HA’GEULA IN MEVO CHORON [email protected] 24 Shlichus | Nosson Avrohom www.beismoshiach.org EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: M.M. Hendel ENGLISH EDITOR: YECHIDUS ALL NIGHT LONG Boruch Merkur Feature | Shneur Zalman Berger HEBREW EDITOR: 30 Rabbi Sholom Yaakov Chazan [email protected] MAZEL TOV ON THE GIRL AND THE 34 Beis Moshiach (USPS 012-542) ISSN 1082- BRIS 0272 is published weekly, except Jewish Story | Tamar Shor holidays (only once in April and October) for $160.00 in Crown Heights, Brooklyn and in all other places for $180.00 per year (45 EVERY JEW IS BIKURIM issues), by Beis Moshiach, 744 Eastern 39 Shlichus | Rabbi Yaakov Shmuelevitz Parkway, Brooklyn, NY 11213-3409. Periodicals postage paid at Brooklyn, NY and additional offices. Postmaster: send address changes to Beis Moshiach 744 Eastern Parkway, Brooklyn, NY 11213-3409. Copyright 2010 by Beis Moshiach, Inc. Beis Moshiach is not responsible for the content of the advertisements. d’var malchus TRUE STRENGTH Sichos In English AN APPROACH- the tribes of the Jewish people, within our material world that a AVOIDANCE CONFLICT because the leader of each of the person’s strength of resolve is tribes was distinguished by his staff of revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Settler Movement Post-Oslo Author(S): Peter Shaw-Smith Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol
    The Israeli Settler Movement Post-Oslo Author(s): Peter Shaw-Smith Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3 (Spring, 1994), pp. 99-109 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Institute for Palestine Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2537963 Accessed: 01-08-2016 17:06 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press, Institute for Palestine Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Palestine Studies This content downloaded from 96.91.243.195 on Mon, 01 Aug 2016 17:06:50 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms THE ISRAELI SETTLER MOVEMENT POST-OSLO PETER SHAW-SMITH If Israel's settlers suffered a setback in their grand strategy when the Likud government was voted out of office in June 1992, this paled compared to the blow they received in September 1993 when the government of Yitzhak Ra- bin recognized the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and signed the Declaration of Principles (DOP) on a Palestinian self-governing authority in the occupied territories. Suddenly, the icy winds of reality blew through the cozy network of politics and infrastructure the settlers had been building since the mid-1970s, and the national consensus they had, rightly or wrongly, taken for granted over their presence in the occupied territories seemed in doubt.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories
    REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peac e Volum e 20 N umber 5 September-October 2010 BARACK OBAMA LOSES THE BATTLE FOR A SETTLEMENT FREEZE By Geoffrey Aronson struction in the West Bank to approxi - sity. In July 2009, however, the limits of mately 2,000. In view of this new con - Obama’s commitment to the freeze were President Barack Obama’s extraordi - struction, the practical value of a reim - revealed when Washington bowed nary diplomatic effort over the last two position of a settlement moratorium before Israel’s continuing settlement years has failed to contain to any signifi - becomes increasingly marginal. expansion in East Jerusalem, notably at cant and lasting degree the expansion of To the extent that there is a substan - the site of the Shepherds Hotel in Israeli settlements in the occupied West tive U.S. diplomatic agenda, it is that Sheikh Jarrah, throwing its demand for Bank and East Jerusalem. Already in its two months of direct talks are all that is a freeze into disarray and underlining first days, the Obama administration required to reach an agreement on the continuing stalemate. From this placed a settlement freeze, then defined where to place the border between Israel point onward, Washington has sought, by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as and a nascent Palestinian state. In view with little consistency or success, to “not some settlements, not outposts, not of the fact that diplomats have failed to “freeze” the freeze debate and focus its natural growth exceptions”—at the cen - draw an agreed border between Israel effort upon the achievement of a largely ter of its diplomatic effort and made it and Palestine for more than more than procedural objective—the establishment the litmus test of Prime Minister Benja- seven decades, and the chasm currently of direct negotiations between Israel and min Netanyahu’s commitment to a two separating the positions of Netanyahu the Palestine Liberation Organization state solution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Military and Israel's Palestinian Policy
    The Israeli Military and Israel’s Palestinian Policy From Oslo to the Al Aqsa Intifada Yo r am Peri United States Institute of Peace Peaceworks No. 47. First published November 2002. The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone. They do not necessarily reflect views of the United States Institute of Peace. UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE 1200 17th Street NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036-3011 Phone: 202-457-1700 Fax: 202-429-6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Contents Key Points 5 Foreword by Samuel W. Lewis 9 1. The Israeli Pattern of Political-Military Partnership 11 2. The Geostrategic Transformation of the 1990s 14 3. The Political Arm of the Israeli Defense Forces 20 4. The Modus Operandi of the Military 26 5. The Second About-Face: The Al Aqsa Intifada 30 6. The Sharon Government: The Tail Wagging the Dog? 36 7. Discussion: Peace from a Realpolitik Perspective 45 8. Conclusions: Civil Supremacy in a Low-Intensity Conflict 52 9. Moving Forward: Recommendations for Improving Civil-Military Relations in Israel 55 Notes 58 References 60 About the Author 63 About the Institute 65 Key Points ◗ Far from being a passive implementer of policy, the Israeli military has been a major catalyst in embarking on the road to peace as well as the path to war. Such a high level of policy influence is uncharacteristic of the military in advanced democracies. However, it has been typical of political-military relations in Israel and has become even more pronounced in the past decade.
    [Show full text]