DOCSLIB.ORG

National Farmers Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Farmers Union National Farmers’ Union Unit 8 Ground Floor Rotherbrook Court Bedford Road Petersfield Hampshire GU32 3QG Your ref: Telephone: 01730 711950 Fax: 01730 711951 Mr Jon Byne Our ref: 2018 001 MEASS Email: [email protected] Mr Richard Westacott Direct line: 01730 711 950 By email: [email protected] Fax: 024 Date: 5th January 2018 7685 8501 Dear Sirs Medway Estuary and Swale Strategy Consultation The NFU is an industry representative organisation, which aims to safeguard the farming and growing business interests of our members. We represent the majority of commercial farm businesses and our views are generated through consultation with a democratically elected membership structure. We have approximately 390 members living and working within the Medway and Swale area. The NFU has been involved at various stages of this consultation and whilst we are unable to comment on the specific proposals for each Benefit Area, there are some general matters where we seek further clarification. Firstly, as you are aware Medway and Swale is a nationally important area for food production. Approximately 10% of the national resource of Grade 1 Agricultural Land is located within these and surrounding districts. The consultation does not provide useful clarity over the way in which highly productive agricultural land has been valued, or how that land will be protected by the strategy. We seek further clarification over how the most valuable land and soils are to be protected in the future. There are a large number of sea walls now designated as “No Active Intervention”, which in our understanding is a downgrade compared to the existing Shoreline Management Plan. In our view this amounts to a formal withdrawal from maintenance, which should mean that commitments from the Environment Agency Asset Maintenance Protocol are now engaged. Namely: To enable landowners and affected parties to understand (where appropriate) “the range of options that may be available to them for future management of the assets and their likely costs, benefits and impacts. The options may include options for continued maintenance of assets by local groups and options involving less or no maintenance. To work with landowners and affected parties in an open and impartial way to facilitate their consideration of the options and, where possible, reach a broad consensus on the preferred way forward. Where new arrangements are agreed, to work in partnership with the landowners and affected parties to support the transition to the new arrangement.” Whilst recognising there has been good dialogue throughout the consultation, the maintenance protocol requires a further level of engagement, working with those affected to help them adapt. As the affected individuals have only just been identified, this is really just the start, rather than completion of the engagement process. As previously discussed we believe it will be important for the Environment Agency and other risk management authorities to lead a formal project that helps deliver management alternatives. There are several examples from across the country where this is taking place already, for example you will be The Voice of British Farming www.nfuonline.com Registered in England No. 245E LETTER FROM NFU aware of the Essex Coast Organisation, which “has a collaboration agreement with the Environment Agency which can provide funding for small scale maintenance and repair work. This type of project work usually costs between one tenth and one twentieth of that charged by government 'Framework Contractors' and can be undertaken far sooner, thus helping public money go much, much further.” Or the Alde Ore Estuary Trust set up to facilitate fund raising for flood defences in relation to sea walls around the town of Aldeburgh. We also note there are several areas of management realignment proposed within the strategy however it is unclear whether the affected landowners have been formally notified? In our understanding the EA can acquire land for the construction or maintenance of defences, and compensation is to be paid for damage arising expressly from such operations. Also where land seaward of justifiable new defences can be shown to contribute to effective defence, whether locally or remotely, landowners should also be eligible for payment for depreciation or loss of land. Whilst we appreciate negotiations are likely to be sensitive, it is a matter of public interest for the Agency to be able to demonstrate it is acting fairly in relation to those most severely affected. From this point of view we request further clarity in relation to the status of negotiations and any dialogue you may have had with affected owners and occupiers of farms within the strategy area. Finally, taking all of the above into consideration, we’ve not seen evidence of any systematic plan for working with the businesses and individuals affected by the strategy. For example we’ve been unable to find any clear communications plan, targeted guidance documents, FAQ’s, a register of affected businesses or any other indication of a need to work with those affected? I appreciate I may be anticipating future stages of this project or may well be unaware of some existing documentation. Nonetheless in very simple terms, if I were an affected landowner attempting to negotiate this consultation, the following key questions appear not to have been answered: What does this mean for my land and my business? What can I do to avoid flooding where sea walls are proposed to have “no active intervention”? What should I do in emergency situations where sea walls have “no active intervention”? Will a change in status affect my rights and responsibilities towards these structures? What maintenance am I able to complete without permission? What can I expect in the coming years and months if my land has been proposed as managed realignment? We very much hope you can provide us with further detail in relation to the matters raised. Yours sincerely Tom Ormesher Environment and Land Use Adviser NFU South East Copied by email to: Alan Jarrett Leader in Medway Unitary Authority - [email protected] Andrew Bowles Leader in Swale Council – [email protected] Gordon Henderson MP - [email protected] Helen Whately MP - [email protected] Julie Folie – EA Area Manager (Kent and South London) – [email protected] Kelly Tolhurst MP - [email protected] Paul Carter Leader KCC - [email protected] Rehman Chisti MP - [email protected] Tracey Crouch MP - [email protected] Page 2 of 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page 1 of 5 the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Brain
    The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Brain Tumours A record of the minutes for the first General Meeting of this Parliament Grand Committee Room, Westminster Hall 28th November 2017, 17:45 - 18:45 This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either Houses or its committees. All-Party Parliamentary Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this report are those of the group. Chair Derek Thomas MP (Con, St Ives) was elected to Parliament for St Ives in May 2015. He was elected as the new Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Brain Tumours (APPGBT) on Monday 10th July 2017, following Rebecca Harris MP’s promotion to Assistant Whip for the Government. Guest Speakers Dr Sheuli Porkess, Interim Executive Director Research, Medical and Innovation, The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry Professor Silvia Marino, President of the British Neuro-Oncology Society and Director of the Brain Tumour Research Centre of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London Dr David Jenkinson, Chief Scientific Officer, The Brain Tumour Charity Dr Kieran Breen, Director of Research, Brain Tumour Research, and Member of the Committee for Advanced Therapies at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Mr Emlyn Samuel, Head of Policy Development, Cancer Research UK Attendees The following MPs were in attendance: 1. Derek Thomas MP 2. Peter Aldous MP 3. Mark Pawsey MP 4. Nicky Morgan MP Page 1 of 5 5. Albert Owen MP 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Role and Powers of the Prime Minister
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Role and powers of the Prime Minister First Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 June 2014 HC 351 Published on 24 June 2014 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider political and constitutional reform. Current membership Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton Deane) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Tracey Crouch MP (Conservative, Chatham and Aylesford) Mark Durkan MP (Social Democratic & Labour Party, Foyle) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) David Morris MP (Conservative, Morecambe and Lunesdale) Robert Neill MP (Conservative, Bromley and Chislehurst) Chris Ruane MP (Labour, Vale of Clwyd) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Yasmin Qureshi MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons- select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/publications/ and by The Stationary Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rt Hon Theresa May MP Liz Field Review of the Year Review of Parliament
    2017 / 2018 FINANCE A YEAR IN PERSPECTIVE FOREWORDS The Rt Hon Theresa May MP Liz Field BROKERAGE, INVESTMENT & FUND MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVES Franklin Templeton Investments Opus Nebula BGC’s Sterling Treasury Division Kingsfleet Wealth Stifel Carbon Wise Investment Herbert Scott Stamford Associates FEATURES Review of the Year Review of Parliament ©2018 WESTMINSTER PUBLICATIONS www.theparliamentaryreview.co.uk Foreword Th e Rt Hon Th eresa May MP Prime Minister British politics provides ample material for analysis in the leading in changes to the future of mobility; meeting the pages of The Parliamentary Review. For Her Majesty’s challenges of our ageing society; and driving ahead the Government, our task in the year ahead is clear: to revolution in clean growth. By focusing our efforts on achieve the best Brexit deal for Britain and to carry on our making the most of these areas of enormous potential, work to build a more prosperous and united country – we can develop new exports, grow new industries, and one that truly works for everyone. create more good jobs in every part of our country. We have already made good progress towards our goal Years of hard work and sacrifice from the British people of leaving the EU, so that we take back control of our have got our deficit down by over three quarters. We are laws, money and borders, while negotiating a deep and building on this success by taking a balanced approach special partnership with it after we have left that is good to public spending. We are continuing to deal with our for jobs and security.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Coast
    NHS South East Coast New MPs ‐ May 2010 Please note: much of the information in the following biographies has been taken from the websites of the MPs and their political parties. NHS BRIGHTON AND HOVE Mike Weatherley ‐ Hove (Cons) Caroline Lucas ‐ Brighton Pavillion (Green) Leader of the Green Party of England and Qualified as a Chartered Management Wales. Previously Green Party Member Accountant and Chartered Marketeer. of the European Parliament for the South From 1994 to 2000 was part owner of a East of England region. company called Cash Based in She was a member of the European Newhaven. From 2000 to 2005 was Parliament’s Environment, Public Health Financial Controller for Pete Waterman. and Food Safety Committee. Most recently Vice President for Finance and Administration (Europe) for the Has worked for a major UK development world’s largest non-theatrical film licensing agency providing research and policy company. analysis on trade, development and environment issues. Has held various Previously a Borough Councillor in positions in the Green Party since joining in 1986 and is an Crawley. acknowledged expert on climate change, international trade and Has run the London Marathon for the Round Table Children’s Wish peace issues. Foundation and most recently last year completed the London to Vice President of the RSPCA, the Stop the War Coalition, Campaign Brighton bike ride for the British Heart Foundation. Has also Against Climate Change, Railfuture and Environmental Protection completed a charity bike ride for the music therapy provider Nordoff UK. Member of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament National Robbins. Council and a Director of the International Forum on Globalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Your Bets
    CMS_LawTax_Negative_28-100.eps Place your bets Gambling and the General Election 2017 June 2017 Contents General Election 2017 3 House of Cards – the politics of gambling in 2015-2017 Parliament 4 The current domestic issues 7 How did we end up here? Reviewing the review 8 The Brexit effect 11 The runners and riders 14 The Party manifestos 16 Gambling team contacts 18 2 | Place your bets – Gambling and the General Election 2017 General Election 2017 Two years ago, in advance of the 2015 General Election in the United Kingdom, Olswang and Regulus Partners issued an analysis of what we saw then as the prevailing public policy issues facing the gambling sector. We stated that there was a ‘watershed moment’ and that the sector was facing an unprecedented range of political risks and threats. Since then much has changed 1 most notably the Brexit also poses several significant challenges to the outcome of the referendum in June 2016 regarding sector. Domestically, restrictions on immigration will exiting the European Union, the change of Prime challenge those gambling operations which employ Minister and the focus of much of public policy concern significant numbers of overseas workers. Internationally, towards the single issue of Brexit. However, the risks remote operators will lose even their theoretical and threats now facing the industry appear if anything protections to provide their services into the UK under to be even more acute. the European Union (and from the UK into the EU). The post-Brexit blueprint for the UK set out by the Most significantly, the political mood towards gambling Conservative Party suggests little encouragement appears to have deteriorated further.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ministers' Interests
    LIST OF MINISTERS’ INTERESTS CABINET OFFICE DECEMBER 2017 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Prime Minister 5 Attorney General’s Office 6 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy 7 Cabinet Office 11 Department for Communities and Local Government 10 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 11 Ministry of Defence 13 Department for Education 14 Department of Exiting the European Union 16 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 17 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 19 Department of Health 21 Home Office 22 Department for International Development 23 Department for International Trade 24 Ministry of Justice 25 Northern Ireland Office 26 Office of the Advocate General for Scotland 27 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 28 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 29 Scotland Office 30 Department for Transport 31 HM Treasury 33 Wales Office 34 Department for Work and Pensions 35 Government Whips – Commons 36 Government Whips – Lords 40 2 INTRODUCTION Ministerial Code Under the terms of the Ministerial Code, Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their Ministerial position and their private interests, financial or otherwise. On appointment to each new office, Ministers must provide their Permanent Secretary with a list, in writing, of all relevant interests known to them, which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. Individual declarations, and a note of any action taken in respect of individual interests, are then passed to the Cabinet Office Propriety and Ethics team and the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests to confirm they are content with the action taken or to provide further advice as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ministers' Interests
    LIST OF MINISTERS’ INTERESTS CABINET OFFICE DECEMBER 2015 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Prime Minister 3 Attorney General’s Office 5 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 6 Cabinet Office 8 Department for Communities and Local Government 10 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 12 Ministry of Defence 14 Department for Education 16 Department of Energy and Climate Change 18 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 19 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 20 Department of Health 22 Home Office 24 Department for International Development 26 Ministry of Justice 27 Northern Ireland Office 30 Office of the Advocate General for Scotland 31 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 32 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 33 Scotland Office 34 Department for Transport 35 HM Treasury 37 Wales Office 39 Department for Work and Pensions 40 Government Whips – Commons 42 Government Whips – Lords 46 INTRODUCTION Ministerial Code Under the terms of the Ministerial Code, Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their Ministerial position and their private interests, financial or otherwise. On appointment to each new office, Ministers must provide their Permanent Secretary with a list in writing of all relevant interests known to them which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. Individual declarations, and a note of any action taken in respect of individual interests, are then passed to the Cabinet Office Propriety and Ethics team and the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests to confirm they are content with the action taken or to provide further advice as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Tuesday Volume 687 19 January 2021 No. 162 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 19 January 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 753 19 JANUARY 2021 754 Chris Law (Dundee West) (SNP) [V]: Global poverty House of Commons has risen for the first time in more than 20 years, and by the end of this year, it is estimated that there will be Tuesday 19 January 2021 more than 150 million people in extreme poverty.Against that backdrop, the UK Government recklessly abolished the Department for International Development, they The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock are reneging on their 0.7% of GNI commitment, and they do not even mention eradicating poverty in the seven global challenges that UK aid is to be focused on. PRAYERS Can the Minister explicitly commit to eradicating poverty within the new official development assistance framework, rather than pursuing inhumane and devastating cuts as [MR SPEAKER ] in the Chair part of the Prime Minister’s little Britain vanity project? Virtual participation in proceedings continued (Order, 4 June and 30 December 2020). James Duddridge: The hon. Gentleman knows that [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] we share a passion for international development. These specific targets do aim to alleviate and eradicate poverty, but the causes of poverty and the solutions to it are complex. That is why the merger of the Departments Oral Answers to Questions works, dealing with development and diplomacy alongside one another to overcome the scourge of poverty, which, sadly, has increased not decreased as a result of covid.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservatives Against Fox Hunting
    From: info To: 2002 Act Review Subject: Submission to the Lord Bonomy Review Date: 29 March 2016 17:38:12 Dear Sirs, Please find the submission to the review from Conservatives Against Fox Hunting. Kind regards, Lorraine Platt Co-Founder www.conservativesagainstfoxhunting.com Conservatives Against Fox Hunting Conservatives Against Fox Hunting (Blue Fox) was founded in 2010. Blue Fox campaigns to prevent the repeal of the Hunting Act 2004. The campaign has five Conservative MP Patrons, including three Government Ministers, Justice Minister, Dominic Raab, Sports Minister Tracey Crouch, Equalities Minister Caroline Dinenage, Sir Roger Gale and Sir David Amess. Hunting with dogs has also been discussed at Westminster, with Blue Fox Patron UK Government Sports Minister Tracey Crouch describing it in December 2015 as a "pursuit from the past", and saying it ' should be consigned to history'. Blue Fox has held parliamentary receptions and briefings to support the Hunting Act and held fringe events at Conservative Party conferences. The hunting of foxes with hounds was banned in Scotland under the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Act, passed in 2002. However, through specific exemptions, hunts are still allowed to use dogs to flush out foxes and chase them toward guns. The legislation has been criticised by animal welfare organisations for too many loopholes. The exemption that allows for a full pack of hounds to be used has the risk of being exploited. Blue Fox believes that the law which was intended to end the barbaric practice of fox hunting has a number of loopholes which have rendered it ineffective. If the number of dogs in the flushing to guns is reduced and there is a limit of two dogs in any exemption of the Scottish Act brought in line with the English and Welsh Hunting Act 2004, we would recommend the introduction of a recklessness provision to the Scottish legislation to prevent 'unfortunate accidents'.
    [Show full text]