DOCSLIB.ORG

EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) (No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) (No 1 House of Commons Wednesday 3 April 2019 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE New Amendments handed in are marked thus EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) (No. 5) BILL FULL LIST OF ADDED NAMES (SUPERSEDES 6.15 VERSION) Mr William Wragg Sir Graham Brady Kate Hoey Nigel Dodds Mr Iain Duncan Smith Tom Pursglove Ross Thomson Steve Double Anne-Marie Trevelyan Crispin Blunt James Duddridge Robert Courts Michael Tomlinson Mr Nigel Evans Mr Charles Walker Mark Pritchard Stephen McPartland Mr Marcus Fysh Sir William Cash Royston Smith Mr Mark Harper Sir Robert Syms Sir Christopher Chope Craig Mackinlay Julia Lopez Will Quince Scott Mann Andrew Lewer Mr John Whittingdale Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg Boris Johnson Gavin Robinson Paul Girvan 19 Clause 1,page1, line 4, at end insert “provided and only if the conditions in subsection (1A) have been met— (1A) The conditions are that— (a) the Prime Minister has made a statement setting out the additional payments to the European Union that would be required should the motion tabled under subsection (2) be agreed without amendment; and (b) the House of Commons has passed a motion of the form “That this House agrees the additional payments to the European Union required under the proposed extension.” 2 Committee of the whole House: 3 April 2019 European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill, continued Will Quince Mr Richard Bacon Michael Tomlinson Royston Smith Stephen McPartland David T. C. Davies Mr Iain Duncan Smith Anne-Marie Trevelyan Grant Shapps Mrs Anne Main Julia Lopez Eddie Hughes Mr Mark Harper Esther McVey Tracey Crouch Sir Bernard Jenkin Chris Green Mr Ranil Jayawardena Mark Pritchard Giles Watling Mr William Wragg Mr Nigel Evans Mr Marcus Fysh Bill Wiggin Boris Johnson Sir Graham Brady Steve Double Craig Tracey Crispin Blunt Craig Mackinlay Mr Laurence Robertson Tom Pursglove Robert Courts Scott Mann Mrs Pauline Latham Priti Patel Sir Robert Syms Rehman Chishti Maria Caulfield Ms Nadine Dorries Bob Stewart James Gray Andrew Bridgen Andrew Lewer Bob Blackman 24 Clause 1,page1, line 4, at end insert “, unless the additional costs of running European Parliament elections in 2019, under the provisions of subsection (2) had first been approved by the House of Commons.” Ian Blackford Stephen Gethins Peter Grant Kirsty Blackman Patrick Grady 23 Clause 1,page1, line 5, leave out subsection (2) and insert— “(2) The form of the motion for the purposes in this subsection shall be one of the following— (a) “That this House agrees for the purposes of section 1 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 to the Prime Minister seeking an extension of the period specified in Article 50(3) of” the Treaty on European Union to a period ending on [….] to facilitate time to legislate to hold a referendum on any draft withdrawal agreement between the UK Government and the European Union agreed by the House of Commons with an option to remain” (b) “That this House agrees for the purposes of section 1 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 to the Prime Minister seeking an extension of the period specified in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union to a period ending on [….] to facilitate time for a debate on a legislation relating to the revocation of notification of withdrawal under article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.” (c) “That this House agrees for the purposes of section 1 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 to the Prime Minister seeking an extension of the period specified in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union to a period ending on [….] to facilitate time for a debate a motion under section 1 of the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act 2011 (d) .”That this House agrees for the purposes of section 1 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 to the Prime Minister seeking an extension of the period specified in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union to a period ending on […].” Committee of the whole House: 3 April 2019 3 European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill, continued Sir William Cash Mr Marcus Fysh Mr David Jones Richard Drax Mr Steve Baker Mr Mark Francois Michael Tomlinson Bill Wiggin Mr William Wragg Craig Mackinlay James Gray Daniel Kawczynski Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg Sir Bernard Jenkin Mrs Anne Main Craig Tracey 11 Clause 1,page1, line 6, leave out “for the purposes of section 2 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019” Member’s explanatory statement This amendment is intended to correct a drafting mistake. Yvette Cooper Sir Oliver Letwin 13 Clause 1,page1, line 6, leave out “section 2” and insert “section 1” Member’s explanatory statement This corrects a drafting error in the Bill as published. Gareth Snell 15 Clause 1,page1, line 9, at end insert— “(2A) In moving any motion under subsection (1), the Prime Minister must offer a reason for seeking an extension of the period specified in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union, and that may be for any reason other than seeking a confirmatory public vote on the Withdrawal Agreement and any framework for the future relationship.” George Eustice 20 Clause 1,page1, line 11, at end add “, and that date shall be no later than 30 June 2019.”. Chuka Umunna Sir Vince Cable Ian Blackford Liz Saville Roberts Caroline Lucas Heidi Allen Mr Chris Leslie Anna Soubry Dr Sarah Wollaston Mike Gapes Angela Smith Ann Coffey Joan Ryan Mr Gavin Shuker Luciana Berger 16 Clause 1,page1, line 20, at end insert— “(5A) In seeking an extension under subsection (4) or subsection (5), the Prime Minister shall give as the reason the intention of the United Kingdom to seek the approval of the people of the United Kingdom in a confirmatory public vote for any Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration framework for the future relationship.” 4 Committee of the whole House: 3 April 2019 European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill, continued George Eustice 21 Clause 1,page1, line 21, leave out subsections (6) and (7) Secretary Stephen Barclay 22 Clause 1,page2, line 3, at end insert— “( ) Nothing in this section prevents a Minister of the Crown from seeking, or agreeing to, an extension of the period specified in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union otherwise than in accordance with this section.” Member’s explanatory statement This amendment ensures that the Bill does not limit the powers that a Minister of the Crown would otherwise have to seek, or agree to, an extension of the Article 50(3) period. Mrs Anne Main John Mann Mr David Davis Kate Hoey Mr Iain Duncan Smith Dr Andrew Murrison Sir Bernard Jenkin Theresa Villiers Philip Davies Mr David Jones Henry Smith Mr Peter Bone Nigel Mills Ms Nadine Dorries Tom Pursglove Mr William Wragg Sir Christopher Chope Andrew Bridgen Mrs Sheryll Murray Mr John Whittingdale Tim Loughton Esther McVey Charlie Elphicke Gareth Johnson Mr Shailesh Vara Mr Simon Clarke Bob Blackman Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg Mr Marcus Fysh 1 Clause 1,page2, line 3, at end insert— “(8) But the Prime Minister may not agree to any extension of the Article 50 period proposed by the European Council which is later than 22 May 2019.” Committee of the whole House: 3 April 2019 5 European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill, continued Nicky Morgan Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg Nigel Dodds Kate Hoey Damian Green Mr Steve Baker Simon Hart Suella Braverman Andrew Percy Sir Graham Brady Julia Lopez Priti Patel Sir Bernard Jenkin George Freeman Mr Iain Duncan Smith Mr Simon Clarke Tom Pursglove Craig Mackinlay Craig Tracey Sir Christopher Chope Stephen McPartland Royston Smith Mr Mark Harper Michael Tomlinson Steve Double Scott Mann Nigel Mills Andrew Rosindell Bob Blackman Andrew Lewer Andrew Bridgen Bill Wiggin Mr Marcus Fysh Charlie Elphicke Mr David Jones Andrea Jenkyns Ross Thomson Mrs Sheryll Murray Mr Jonathan Lord Mr John Whittingdale Mr David Davis Zac Goldsmith Philip Davies Mr William Wragg Dominic Raab Crispin Blunt James Duddridge Michael Fabricant Mr Laurence Robertson Chris Green Tim Loughton Mrs Pauline Latham Robert Courts Theresa Villiers Sir Hugo Swire Neil Parish 12 Page 1, line 1, leave out Clause 1 Yvette Cooper Sir Oliver Letwin 14 Clause 2,page2, line 5, leave out “2018 Act” and insert “the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018” Member’s explanatory statement This clarifies the title of the previous Act being referred to. Sir William Cash Mr Marcus Fysh Mr David Jones Richard Drax Mr Steve Baker Mr Mark Francois Michael Tomlinson Bill Wiggin Mr William Wragg Craig Mackinlay James Gray Daniel Kawczynski Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg Sir Bernard Jenkin Mrs Anne Main Craig Tracey 3 Clause 2,page2, line 7, leave out from “force” to end of line 7 and insert “subject to the Prime Minister receiving confirmation that the European Council will commence negotiations on the replacement of the Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol, contained in the draft Withdrawal Agreement, with alternative arrangements.” 6 Committee of the whole House: 3 April 2019 European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill, continued Sir William Cash Mr Marcus Fysh Mr David Jones Richard Drax Mr Steve Baker Mr Mark Francois Michael Tomlinson Bill Wiggin Mr William Wragg Craig Mackinlay James Gray Daniel Kawczynski Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg Sir Bernard Jenkin Mrs Anne Main Craig Tracey 4 Clause 2,page2, line 7, leave out from “force” to end of line 7 and insert “on 13 April 2019.” Sir William Cash Mr Marcus Fysh Mr David Jones Richard Drax Mr Steve Baker Mr Mark Francois Michael Tomlinson Bill Wiggin Mr William Wragg Craig Mackinlay James Gray Daniel Kawczynski Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg Sir Bernard Jenkin Mrs Anne Main Craig Tracey 5 Clause 2,page2, line 7, leave out from “force” to end of line 7 and insert “on such day as a Minister of the Crown may by regulations appoint no earlier than 13 April 2019.” Sir William Cash Mr Marcus Fysh Mr David Jones Richard Drax Mr Steve Baker Mr Mark Francois Michael Tomlinson Bill Wiggin Mr William Wragg Craig Mackinlay James Gray Daniel Kawczynski Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg Sir Bernard Jenkin Mrs Anne Main Craig Tracey 6 Clause 2,page2, line 7, leave out from “force” to end and insert “subject to the approval of the Northern Ireland Assembly, the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly of Wales, on such day as a Minister of the Crown may by regulations appoint.” Committee of the whole House: 3 April 2019 7 European Union (Withdrawal) (No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Amendment) Bill
    Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport with the agreement of Theresa Villiers, are published separately as Bill 182—EN. Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill CONTENTS 1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009: repeal of sunset provision 2 Extent, commencement and short title Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill 1 A BILL TO Prevent the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 from expiring on 11 November 2019. E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009: repeal of sunset provision In section 4 of the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009— (a) in the heading, for “, commencement and sunset” substitute “and commencement”, and (b) omit subsection (7) (which provides for the Act to expire after 10 years). 5 2 Extent, commencement and short title (1) This Act extends to— (a) England and Wales, and (b) Scotland. (2) This Act comes into force on the day on which it is passed. 10 (3) This Act may be cited as the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Act 2018. Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill A BILL To prevent the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 from expiring on 11 November 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • National Life Stories an Oral History of British
    NATIONAL LIFE STORIES AN ORAL HISTORY OF BRITISH SCIENCE Professor Bob Dickson Interviewed by Dr Paul Merchant C1379/56 © The British Library Board http://sounds.bl.uk This interview and transcript is accessible via http://sounds.bl.uk . © The British Library Board. Please refer to the Oral History curators at the British Library prior to any publication or broadcast from this document. Oral History The British Library 96 Euston Road London NW1 2DB United Kingdom +44 (0)20 7412 7404 [email protected] Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of this transcript, however no transcript is an exact translation of the spoken word, and this document is intended to be a guide to the original recording, not replace it. Should you find any errors please inform the Oral History curators. © The British Library Board http://sounds.bl.uk British Library Sound Archive National Life Stories Interview Summary Sheet Title Page Ref no: C1379/56 Collection title: An Oral History of British Science Interviewee’s surname: Dickson Title: Professor Interviewee’s forename: Bob Sex: Male Occupation: oceanographer Date and place of birth: 4th December, 1941, Edinburgh, Scotland Mother’s occupation: Housewife , art Father’s occupation: Schoolmaster teacher (part time) [chemistry] Dates of recording, Compact flash cards used, tracks [from – to]: 9/8/11 [track 1-3], 16/12/11 [track 4- 7], 28/10/11 [track 8-12], 14/2/13 [track 13-15] Location of interview: CEFAS [Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science], Lowestoft, Suffolk Name of interviewer: Dr Paul Merchant Type of recorder: Marantz PMD661 Recording format : 661: WAV 24 bit 48kHz Total no.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Oral Evidence: Brexit and the Northern Ireland Protocol, HC 157
    Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Oral evidence: Brexit and the Northern Ireland Protocol, HC 157 Wednesday 16 June 2021 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 16 June 2021. Watch the meeting Members present: Simon Hoare (Chair); Scott Benton; Mr Gregory Campbell; Stephen Farry; Mary Kelly Foy; Mr Robert Goodwill; Claire Hanna; Fay Jones; Ian Paisley; Bob Stewart. Questions 941-1012 Witnesses I: The Rt Hon. Lord David Frost CMG, Minister of State for the Cabinet Office, and Mark Davies, Deputy Director, Transition Task Force Northern Ireland, Cabinet Office. Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Lord Frost and Mark Davies. Q941 Chair: Good morning, colleagues, and welcome to this session of our inquiry into Brexit and the Northern Ireland protocol. May I ask if any colleagues have any declarations of interest before we begin the meeting? Ian Paisley: I am involved in a legal action against the protocol with a number of commercial entities. Q942 Chair: Thank you. Lord Frost, you heard that, so that is under advisement, as it were. Minister, let me begin by establishing a few basic facts, because I think there is some uncertainty in the media and in the world of politics. Hopefully this will be a sort of quickfire yes or no round to get us into second gear. Could you confirm that Her Majesty’s Government negotiated with the European Union the Northern Ireland protocol? Lord Frost: Thank you, Chairman, and good morning. Before I answer that question, I would like to make one remark up front. It is a pleasure to be here today.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bills Before Parliament This Session
    Legislation – General Notes In the list of Bills which follows, the type of Bill is shown at the left-hand margin next to the title by the following codes: G Government Bills C Consolidation Bills B Private Members' Bills (Presentation bill under SO No 57 prioritised by the ballot procedure SO No 14 (6)). The number after refers to position in ballot P Private Members' Bills (Presentation bill under SO No 57) T Private Members' Bills (Presentation bill under the Ten Minute Rule, SO No 23) L Private Members' Bills starting in the House of Lords (Presentation bill under HL SO No 41 (3)) [HL] Bill starting in the House of Lords HYBRID Public Bill which affects private interests of particular persons or corporate bodies as distinct from the private interests of all persons or bodies Abbreviations: 1R First reading: date of presentation (formal, no debate) 2R Second reading (debate on the principle(s) of the Bill) MR Money resolution (normally taken after 2R only shown in the list if taken at another time) WM Ways and Means resolution GM Guillotine Motion SRC Second Reading Committee (2R taken in Committee: formal 2R in whole House next day unless otherwise stated) SGC/WGC Scottish or Welsh Grand Committee consideration of principles (equates with SRC) PBC Public Bill Committee in the House of Commons Comm Committee of the Whole House Comm** House of Lords Grand Committee, taken in a committee room JCCB Joint Committee on Consolidation Bills JC TLRB Joint Committee on Tax Law Re-write Bills (the date indicates the date on which the Bill was committed to the Joint Committee).
    [Show full text]
  • The Kremlin Trojan Horses | the Atlantic Council
    Atlantic Council DINU PATRICIU EURASIA CENTER THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Russian Influence in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski ISBN: 978-1-61977-518-3. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Foreword Introduction: The Kremlin’s Toolkit of Influence 3 in Europe 7 France: Mainstreaming Russian Influence 13 Germany: Interdependence as Vulnerability 20 United Kingdom: Vulnerable but Resistant Policy recommendations: Resisting Russia’s 27 Efforts to Influence, Infiltrate, and Inculcate 29 About the Authors THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES FOREWORD In 2014, Russia seized Crimea through military force. With this act, the Kremlin redrew the political map of Europe and upended the rules of the acknowledged international order. Despite the threat Russia’s revanchist policies pose to European stability and established international law, some European politicians, experts, and civic groups have expressed support for—or sympathy with—the Kremlin’s actions. These allies represent a diverse network of political influence reaching deep into Europe’s core. The Kremlin uses these Trojan horses to destabilize European politics so efficiently, that even Russia’s limited might could become a decisive factor in matters of European and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of the Whole House Proceedings
    1 House of Commons Thursday 11 February 2021 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS MINISTERIAL AND OTHER MATERNITY ALLOWANCES BILL GLOSSARY This document shows the fate of each clause, schedule, amendment and new clause. The following terms are used: Added: New Clause agreed without a vote and added to the Bill. Agreed to: agreed without a vote. Agreed to on division: agreed following a vote. Negatived: rejected without a vote. Negatived on division: rejected following a vote. Not called: debated in a group of amendments, but not put to a decision. Not moved: not debated or put to a decision. Question proposed: debate underway but not concluded. Withdrawn after debate: moved and debated but then withdrawn, so not put to a decision. Not selected: not chosen for debate by the Chair. Kirsten Oswald Negatived 3 Clause 1,page1, line 5, leave out “may” and insert “must” 2 Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 11 February 2021 Ministerial and Other Maternity Allowances Bill, continued Jackie Doyle-Price Sir John Hayes Ben Bradley Tonia Antoniazzi Rosie Duffield Cherilyn Mackrory Andrew Rosindell Fiona Bruce Stephen Metcalfe Bob Blackman Not called 15 Clause 1,page1, line 5, leave out “a person as” Jackie Doyle-Price Sir John Hayes Ben Bradley Tonia Antoniazzi Rosie Duffield Cherilyn Mackrory Andrew Rosindell Fiona Bruce Stephen Metcalfe Bob Blackman Not called 16 Clause 1,page1, line 14, leave out “person” and insert “minister” Sir John Hayes Miriam Cates Lee Anderson Alexander Stafford Ben Bradley Tom Hunt Sir Edward Leigh Karl McCartney
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of 2008122008-Cwells-Regulated
    1 donation information continues on reverse Late reported donation by regulated donees 15 February 2001 - 31 January 2008 (where data is available) Regulated donee Donor organisation Donor forename Donor surname Donor status Address 1 Address 2 Jimmy Hood MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Keith Simpson MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Cheryl Gillan MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Elfyn Llwyd MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Stewart MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Stewart MP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall John Gummer MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Christopher Beazles BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Chris Smith MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Mike Weir MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Tony Worthington MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Davidson MP BAA plc Company 130 Wilton Road Paul Tyler BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Matthew Taylor MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Menzies Campbell MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Archy Kirkwood BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road David Hanson MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Colin Breed MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road David Marshall MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Mark Oaten MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Diana Wallis MEP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall Christopher Ruane MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Tim Loughton MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Robert Wareing MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Robert Wareing MP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall John McFall MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Wednesday Volume 654 13 February 2019 No. 252 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 13 February 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 865 13 FEBRUARY 2019 866 Tim Loughton (East Worthing and Shoreham) (Con): House of Commons May I declare an interest, having recently joined the hon. Member for Stretford and Urmston (Kate Green) Wednesday 13 February 2019 on a visit with Oxfam in Jordan? I very much welcome the London initiative. Will urgent steps be taken to take account of the fact that youth unemployment in the The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock country is now some 38%? Not only is there a high level of female unemployment, but the participation rate of women in the workforce in Jordan is even lower than PRAYERS that in Saudi Arabia. Will those urgent objectives be at the heart of what the Secretary of State is trying to achieve? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Penny Mordaunt: I can reassure my hon. Friend that that will absolutely be the case. This issue has been a Oral Answers to Questions focus for me personally on my visits to Jordan, and I will be focusing on it at the London conference. Mr Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) (Lab/Co-op): Does INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT the Secretary of State realise that one thing holding back development in Jordan is the number of children and young people killed on the roads there? I spoke at a The Secretary of State was asked— conference in Jordan recently, where we looked at this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Read CDPRG Chairman Crispin Blunt's Letter to the Prime Minister
    The Conservative Drug Policy Reform Group, Limited Suite 15.17 Citibase, 15th Floor Millbank Tower 21-24 Millbank, Westminster London SW1P 4QP The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP The Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA 20 November 2020 Dear Prime Minister, As Chairman of the Conservative Drug Policy Reform Group, I am writing today with a comprehensive set of recommendations prepared by the CDPRG research team, to secure the future of the UK’s cannabidiol (CBD) industry. Though nascent, this industry is already valued at £300 million and it is predicted to grow to around £1 billion by 2025, equivalent to the entirety of the UK’s herbal supplement market in 2016. I am sure you will agree with me that this projected market growth, and the jobs, investment and R&D it attracts, needs safeguarding and stimulating rather than inhibiting. This fulfilment depends on the practicality of the legislations safeguarding this burgeoning industry, which is why I am writing to strongly recommend that the UK votes in favour of recommendations to be proposed on 02 December 2020 by the World Health Organisation at the 53rd United Nations Session on the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND), of which the UK is a signatory. The WHO recommends adding the following footnote to the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, to read: "Preparations containing predominantly cannabidiol and not more than 0.2 percent of delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] are not under international control”. This harmonises with a ruling issued this week from the European Union that member states may not prohibit the marketing of CBD lawfully produced in other member states.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ ANGLO-SAUDI CULTURAL RELATIONS CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF BILATERAL TIES, 1950- 2010 Alhargan, Haya Saleh Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 1 ANGLO-SAUDI CULTURAL RELATIONS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF BILATERAL TIES, 1950-2010 by Haya Saleh AlHargan Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Middle East and Mediterranean Studies Programme King’s College University of London 2015 2 ABSTRACT This study investigates Anglo-Saudi cultural relations from 1950 to 2010, with the aim of greater understanding the nature of those relations, analysing the factors affecting them and examining their role in enhancing cultural relations between the two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Rt Hon Rishi Sunak MP Chancellor of the Exchequer HM Treasury 1 Horse Guards Road London SW1A 2HQ
    Rt Hon Rishi Sunak MP Chancellor of the Exchequer HM Treasury 1 Horse Guards Road London SW1A 2HQ Dear Chancellor, Budget Measures to Support Hospitality and Tourism We are writing today as members and supporters of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Hospitality and Tourism ahead of the Budget on 3rd March. As you will of course be aware, hospitality and tourism are vital to the UK’s economy along with the livelihoods and wellbeing of millions of people across the UK. The pandemic has amplified this, with its impacts illustrating the pan-UK nature of these sectors, the economic benefits they generate, and the wider social and wellbeing benefits that they provide. The role that these sectors play in terms of boosting local, civic pride in all our constituencies, and the strong sense of community that they foster, should not be underestimated. It is well-established that people relate to their local town centres, high streets and community hubs, of which the hospitality and tourism sectors are an essential part. The latest figures from 2020 highlight the significant impact that the virus has had on these industries. In 2020, the hospitality sector has seen a sales drop of 53.8%, equating to a loss in revenue of £72 billion. This decline has impacted the UK’s national economy by taking off around 2 percentage points from total GDP. For hospitality, this downturn is already estimated to be over 10 times worse than the impact of the financial crisis. It is estimated that employment in the sector has dropped by over 1 million jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • The IR35 MP Hit List ­ the 100 Politicians Most Likely to Lose Their Seats
    The UK's leading contractor site. 200,000 monthly unique visitors. GUIDES IR35 CALCULATORS BUSINESS INSURANCE BANKING ACCOUNTANTS INSURANCE MORTGAGES PENSIONS RESOURCES FREE IR35 TEST The IR35 MP hit list ­ The 100 politicians most likely to lose their seats Last December research conducted by ContractorCalculator identified the MPs for whom it will prove most costly to lose the self­employed vote, and published the top 20 from each party. The results were based on data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and contractor sentiment indicated by a previous ContractorCalculator survey. The full results of this research are now published, with the top 100 MPs, ordered by risk of losing their seat, due to the Off­payroll (IR35) reforms that Treasury, HMRC and the Chancellor are attempting to push through Parliament. In total, 85 MPs hold a majority in Parliament that would feasibly be overturned if the expected turnout of IR35­opposing self­employed voters from their constituency were to vote against them, and we list the next 15, making 100 in total, that are potentially under threat if the self­ employed voter turnout is higher than expected. "This single piece of damaging policy could prove catastrophic for all parties involved, not least the Tories, who make up 43% of the at­risk seats,” comments ContractorCalculator CEO, Dave Chaplin. “There is also potentially a lot to gain for some, but those in precarious positions will have to act swiftly and earnestly to win over contractors’ trust.” How we identified the at­risk MPs The research leveraged the data and compared the MPs majority at the last election with the likely number of self­employed voters in their area who would turn out and vote against them.
    [Show full text]