Whole Day Download the Hansard

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Whole Day Download the Hansard Wednesday Volume 679 9 September 2020 No. 97 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 9 September 2020 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 599 9 SEPTEMBER 2020 600 Mr Jack: Our armed forces have been instrumental in House of Commons the Government’s response to the pandemic, and I give my deep thanks to them for that work. In Scotland, that Wednesday 9 September 2020 has included military planning personnel for the Scottish Government’s emergency co-ordination centre, Puma The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock helicopters deployed to Kinloss to support the NHS in medical transport and airlift critically ill patients from PRAYERS the Scottish highlands, and the operating of pop-up mobile testing sites across Scotland. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Strengthening the Union Virtual participation in proceedings commenced (Order, 4 June). Bob Blackman (Harrow East) (Con): What steps his Department is taking to strengthen the Union. [905550] [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] Alexander Stafford (Rother Valley) (Con): What steps his Department is taking to strengthen the Union. Oral Answers to Questions [905553] The Secretary of State for Scotland (Mr Alister Jack): SCOTLAND The Government and this Prime Minister are passionate about the Union, and the strength of the Union has never been more important or more evident. The UK The Secretary of State was asked— has the economic strength to support jobs and businesses Armed Forces Personnel with generous financial packages, and it is the strength of the Union that will enable us to rebuild our economy Joy Morrissey (Beaconsfield) (Con): What steps his and swiftly respond to any emerging threats to our Department is taking to support British armed forces prosperity. personnel based in Scotland. [905549] Bob Blackman [V]: I thank my right hon. Friend for Mark Jenkinson (Workington) (Con): What steps his his answer. Figures released by the Scottish Government Department is taking to support British armed forces demonstrate that the cost to Scotland of leaving the personnel based in Scotland. [905561] United Kingdom and becoming independent would be £15.1 billion a year. We know that those figures must be The Secretary of State for Scotland (Mr Alister Jack): true, because they were released by the SNP Government. British armed forces personnel in Scotland play a crucial Does he agree that, far from creating an economic case role in defending the whole UK, and my Department for leaving the United Kingdom, that demonstrates the meets regularly with the Ministry of Defence to help strength of the Union and why Scotland is far better off raise concerns that are specific to Scotland. I feel particularly being in the United Kingdom? indebted to the armed forces in Scotland, who keep us safe at home and abroad and who assisted with such Mr Jack: Yes, absolutely. The Scottish Government’s dedication at the height of this covid pandemic. own figures show clearly how much Scotland benefits from being part of a strong United Kingdom, with the Joy Morrissey: The SNP Government’s decision to pooling and sharing of resources. Year after year, people make Scotland the highest taxed part of the UK has in Scotland benefit from levels of public spending threatened to put the many brave troops based there out substantially above the United Kingdom’s average, and of pocket through no fault of their own. Does my right that Union dividend is worth almost £2,000 per person hon. Friend agree that, because our armed forces serve to everyone in Scotland. the whole UK, it is only right that they are treated equally and fairly wherever they are based? Alexander Stafford: Last month’s figures from the Scottish Government confirmed that our Union is worth Mr Jack: I absolutely agree. Our armed forces perform nearly £2,000 a year for every man, woman and child in a hugely important task in their service of the United Scotland. Does my right hon. Friend agree that we not Kingdom, and it is unacceptable that any member of only benefit from being one Union and one happy them should be subject to discriminatory taxation. That family together, but that the economic benefits for is why the United Kingdom Government took the Scotland from the Union are huge? decision to make an annual payment to protect them from the Scottish Government’sdecision to make Scotland Mr Jack: Yes, my hon. Friend is right. The benefits of the highest taxed part of the United Kingdom. the Union go way beyond public spending. The strength and size of the UK economy creates opportunities for Mark Jenkinson: British armed forces have contributed Scottish businesses, and around 60% of Scotland’s exports enormously to the national response to the covid-19 currently go to the rest of the UK. That is more than outbreak, supporting the distribution of personal protective she trades with the rest of the world. equipment, assisting with testing facilities and transporting patients, for which Cumbria and my constituency of Ian Murray (Edinburgh South) (Lab) [V]: The Secretaries Workington are grateful. Will my right hon. Friend join of State for Northern Ireland and for Health and Social me in thanking the armed forces for all their work Care have confirmed that the Government will break during the pandemic, and can he confirm that every the law by overriding the Northern Ireland protocol. part of our United Kingdom will continue to benefit That would mean reneging on the withdrawal from their hard work? agreement—an agreement that the Prime Minister himself 601 Oral Answers 9 SEPTEMBER 2020 Oral Answers 602 negotiated, brought to this House, voted for, ratified their United Kingdom Internal Market Bill. I want to and campaigned on at the general election. This reckless ask specifically about clause 46, which states that any move reignites the prospect of us crashing out of the UK Minister of the Crown may promote and directly European Union with no deal. The Prime Minister provide economic development, effectively allowing the promised the British people an oven-ready deal. It now UK Government the powers to legislate in the following looks like an oven-ready no-deal. The Secretary of devolved areas: health; education; water; electricity; State himself has said previously that a no-deal outcome courts and pension facilities; housing; and the list goes would “create damaging uncertainty” for the country on. Am I correct in my understanding that when the and that he would never vote for anything that threatened Government says that they are strengthening the Union, or undermined the integrity of our United Kingdom. what they really mean is dismantling devolution? Does he think that reneging on an international treaty, breaking their promise on a deal and putting no-deal Mr Jack: Absolutely not. We are strengthening firmly back on the table strengthens or weakens the devolution. We are bringing a power surge to Scotland— Union? more than 100 new powers. We are not taking a single power away, and I invite the hon. Lady to name one that Mr Jack: First, I congratulate the hon. Gentleman we are. I say that we are the party that backs devolution. and his partner on the birth of their baby daughter, The SNP is the party that wants to destroy devolution Zola, which is why he is currently on paternity leave. by leaving the United Kingdom. I hope that I face even questions such as that from the hon. Gentleman for some time to come, because he is Mhairi Black: Will the Secretary of State tell me, if he honourable, which is a lot more than can be said for is not dismantling devolution, specifically where in the many in his party—the hard left of his party—who have Bill does it say that the UK Government must acquire sought to smear and undermine him in recent days. In the consent of the devolved Administrations? answer to his question, we absolutely do want a deal. We are in serious negotiations again this week because Mr Jack: The UK Government would like to we want to get a deal, and that is our intention, but the get a legislative consent motion from the devolved withdrawal agreement was written on the basis that Administrations, but we are quite clear that we need subsequent agreements could be reached through the to bring forward this UK legislation to protect jobs, to Joint Committee, and that Joint Committee process is protect producers, to protect manufacturers and to ongoing and we are committed to it. None the less, in protect consumers. This is a piece of legislation that, the event that it cannot deal with any adverse implications through mutual recognition and non-discrimination, for the Good Friday agreement, it is important that we strengthens our United Kingdom economy. That is have a position that creates a safety net to uphold our important to Scotland because over £50 billion of trade commitments to the members of Northern Ireland. is done with the rest of the UK—more than Scotland does with the rest of the world. Mr Speaker: We do need to speed up. Douglas Ross (Moray) (Con): Further talk of constitutional wrangling is deeply unhelpful at a time Ian Murray: I am very grateful to the Secretary of when we continue to fight the coronavirus pandemic in State for his kind words about Zola, and if his Government Scotland and across much of the world. Does the could legislate for a minimum of six hours’ sleep for Secretary of State therefore agree that the SNP has got new parents, I certainly would be the first person in the its priorities completely wrong by finding time to bring Aye Lobby to support them.
Recommended publications
  • Page 1 of 5 the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Brain
    The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Brain Tumours A record of the minutes for the first General Meeting of this Parliament Grand Committee Room, Westminster Hall 28th November 2017, 17:45 - 18:45 This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either Houses or its committees. All-Party Parliamentary Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this report are those of the group. Chair Derek Thomas MP (Con, St Ives) was elected to Parliament for St Ives in May 2015. He was elected as the new Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Brain Tumours (APPGBT) on Monday 10th July 2017, following Rebecca Harris MP’s promotion to Assistant Whip for the Government. Guest Speakers Dr Sheuli Porkess, Interim Executive Director Research, Medical and Innovation, The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry Professor Silvia Marino, President of the British Neuro-Oncology Society and Director of the Brain Tumour Research Centre of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London Dr David Jenkinson, Chief Scientific Officer, The Brain Tumour Charity Dr Kieran Breen, Director of Research, Brain Tumour Research, and Member of the Committee for Advanced Therapies at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Mr Emlyn Samuel, Head of Policy Development, Cancer Research UK Attendees The following MPs were in attendance: 1. Derek Thomas MP 2. Peter Aldous MP 3. Mark Pawsey MP 4. Nicky Morgan MP Page 1 of 5 5. Albert Owen MP 6.
    [Show full text]
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims
    All Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims The inquiry into a working definition of Islamophobia Report on the inquiry into A working definition of Islamophobia / anti-Muslim hatred All Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims Report on the inquiry into a working definition of Islamophobia / anti-Muslim hatred 3 The All Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims was launched in 2017. The cross party group of parliamentarians is co-chaired by Anna Soubry MP and Wes Streeting MP. The Group was established to highlight the aspirations and challenges facing British Muslims; to celebrate the contributions of Muslim communities to Britain and to investigate prejudice, discrimination and hatred against Muslims in the UK. appgbritishmuslims.org facebook.com/APPGBritMuslims @APPGBritMuslims Report on the inquiry into A working definition of Islamophobia / anti-Muslim hatred All Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims Contents Foreword by Dominic Grieve QC 6 Foreword by Anna Soubry and Wes Streeting 7 Executive Summary 9 Introduction 12 Chapter 1 Literature review 19 Chapter 2 - Arriving at a working definition 23 Chapter 3 - Our findings 27 An INDEX to Tackle Islamophobia 51 Chapter 4 - Community consultation findings 52 Conclusion 56 Acknowledgements 60 Appendix 1 - Written evidence 61 Appendix 2 - Oral evidence sessions 62 Appendix 3 - Community consultation participants 63 Appendix 4 - Islamophobia / Anti Muslim hatred questionnaire 64 Bibliography 66 5 Foreword s Chair of the Citizens UK Commission on Islam, Participation and Public Life, I travelled round the country hearing evidence as to the extent to which this desirable goal was taking place and as to the reasons why it was not happening Ain the way many Muslims and others wished.
    [Show full text]
  • Role and Powers of the Prime Minister
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Role and powers of the Prime Minister First Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 June 2014 HC 351 Published on 24 June 2014 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider political and constitutional reform. Current membership Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton Deane) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Tracey Crouch MP (Conservative, Chatham and Aylesford) Mark Durkan MP (Social Democratic & Labour Party, Foyle) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) David Morris MP (Conservative, Morecambe and Lunesdale) Robert Neill MP (Conservative, Bromley and Chislehurst) Chris Ruane MP (Labour, Vale of Clwyd) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Yasmin Qureshi MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons- select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/publications/ and by The Stationary Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA
    The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA Dear Prime Minister, We are writing to you as a group of cross-party parliamentarians to express our grave concern over the contents of US President Donald Trump’s so-called ‘peace plan’ for Israel and the Palestinians. The plan presented on 28 January shows contempt for the rights of the Palestinian people and international law, and provides no realistic basis for a return to negotiations. Instead, it makes peace less likely, and threatens to undermine a fundamental principle of the post-WWII international legal order: the prohibition of annexation and territorial conquest. The long-standing position of the UK is that a negotiated peace settlement must be agreed to achieve a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, leading to a safe and secure Israel living alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state that has secure and recognised borders, and with Jerusalem as a shared capital of both states. The vision presented by the US administration is one where Palestinians would have none of these: no true shared capital in Jerusalem, no sovereign control of its borders or security, and with Israeli control far beyond the Green Line. As a group of 16 UK charities warned this week: “if implemented [the plan] will lead to the formal annexation of Palestinian land, perpetual Israeli occupation, and the negation of Palestinians’ collective right to self-determination.” It is a plan that the Palestinians have no choice but to reject if they wish to maintain their fundamental rights, but that they will be punished for not accepting.
    [Show full text]
  • Organised With: Fabian Summer Conference 2016 Britain's Future, Labour's Future Saturday 21 May 2016, 09.30 – 17.15 TUC Co
    Organised with: Fabian Summer conference 2016 Britain’s Future, Labour’s Future Saturday 21 May 2016, 09.30 – 17.15 TUC Congress Centre, 28 Great Russell Street, London, WC1B 3LS 9.30-10.20 Registration Tea and coffee 10.20-10.45 Welcome Main Hall Andrew Harrop (general secretary, Fabian Society) Massimo D’Alema (president, Foundation for European Progressive Studies) 10.45-11.30 Keynote speech Main Hall Gordon Brown (former prime minister) 11.30-12.20 Morning Plenary ‘Should we stay or should we go now’: What should the left decide? Main Hall Caroline Flint MP (Labour MP, Don Valley) Baroness Jenny Jones (Green Party, Member of the House of Lords) Tim Montgomerie (columnist, The Times) Chair: Andrew Harrop, (general secretary, Fabian Society) 12.30-13.30 Breakout sessions Main Hall It’s the economy, stupid: what’s best for jobs and growth? Shabana Mahmood MP (Labour MP, Birmingham Ladywood) John Mills (deputy chair, Vote Leave) Lucy Anderson MEP (Labour MEP for London) Vicky Pryce (economist) Chair: Michael Izza (chief executive, ICAEW) Council Chamber The jury’s out: can the campaigns persuade the ‘undecideds’? Interactive session Brendan Chilton (general secretary, Labour Leave) Antonia Bance (head of campaigns and communications, TUC) Richard Angell (director, Progress) Chair: Felicity Slater (exec member, Fabian Women’s Network) Meeting Room 1 Drifting apart? The four nations and Europe Nia Griffith MP (shadow secretary of state for wales and Labour MP for Llanelli) John Denham (director, University of Winchester’s Centre for English
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday 20 April 2021 COMMITTEE of the WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS
    1 SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS Tuesday 20 April 2021 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS FINANCE (No. 2) BILL (Clauses 1 to 5; Clauses 6 to 14 and Schedule 1; Clauses 24 to 26; Clause 28; Clause 30 and Schedule 6; Clauses 31 to 33; Clause 36 and Schedule 7; Clause 40; Clause 41; Clause 86; Clauses 87 to 89 and Schedules 16 and 17; Clauses 90 and 91; Clauses 92 to 96 and Schedule 18; Clause 97 and Schedule 19; Clauses 109 to 111 and Schedules 21 and 22; Clause 115 and Schedule 27; Clauses 117 to 121 and Schedules 29 to 32; Clauses 128 to 130; any new Clauses or new Schedules relating to: the impact of any provision on the financial resources of families or to the subject matter of Clauses 1 to 5, 24 to 26, 28, 31 to 33, 40 and 86; the subject matter of Clauses 6 to 14 and Schedule 1; the impact of any provision on regional economic development; tax avoidance or evasion; the subject matter of Clauses 87 to 89 and Schedules 16 and 17 and Clauses 90 and 91; the subject matter of Clauses 92 to 96 and Schedule 18, Clause 97 and Schedule 19 and Clauses 128 to 130) [FIRST AND SECOND DAY] GLOSSARY This document shows the fate of each clause, schedule, amendment and new clause. The following terms are used: Added: New Clause agreed without a vote and added to the Bill. Agreed to: agreed without a vote. Agreed to on division: agreed following a vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report Monday, 9 November 2020 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Monday, 9 November 2020 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 9 November 2020 and the information is correct at the time of publication (07:12 P.M., 09 November 2020). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 8 Licensed Premises: BUSINESS, ENERGY AND Coronavirus 20 INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 8 Life Sciences 20 Beer: Small Businesses 8 Low Pay: Coronavirus 21 Bounce Back Loan Scheme: Nuclear Power 22 Sussex 8 Nuclear Power Stations: Business: Coronavirus 9 Finance 22 Carbon Emissions 11 Nuclear Reactors 22 Consumer Goods: Safety 11 Overseas Students: EU Coronavirus: Disease Control 12 Nationals 23 Coronavirus: Remote Working 12 Personal Care Services: Coronavirus 23 Coronavirus: Social Distancing 13 Political Parties: Coronavirus 24 Debenhams: Coronavirus 13 Post Office: Legal Costs 24 Economic Situation: Coronavirus 14 Post Offices: ICT 25 Electronic Commerce: Renewable Energy 25 Regulation 14 Research: Public Consultation 27 Energy Supply 15 Research: Publishing 27 Energy: Meters 15 Retail Trade: Coventry 28 Erasmus+ Programme and Shipping: Tees Valley 28 Horizon Europe 16 Solar power: Faversham 29 Fireworks: Safety 16 Unemployment: Coronavirus 29 Green Homes Grant Scheme 17 Weddings: Coronavirus 30 Horizon Europe 18 Wind Power 31 Housing: Energy 19 Hydrogen 20 CABINET OFFICE 31 Musicians: Coronavirus 44 Ballot Papers: Visual Skateboarding: Coronavirus 44 Impairment 31
    [Show full text]
  • Vindication, Virtue, and Vitriol
    Journal of Computational Social Science https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00090-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Vindication, virtue, and vitriol A study of online engagement and abuse toward British MPs during the COVID-19 pandemic Tracie Farrell1 · Genevieve Gorrell1 · Kalina Bontcheva1 Received: 21 July 2020 / Accepted: 11 October 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract COVID-19 has given rise to a lot of malicious content online, including hate speech, online abuse, and misinformation. British MPs have also received abuse and hate on social media during this time. To understand and contextualise the level of abuse MPs receive, we consider how ministers use social media to communicate about the pandemic, and the citizen engagement that this generates. The focus of the paper is on a large-scale, mixed-methods study of abusive and antagonistic responses to UK politicians on Twitter, during the pandemic from early February to late May 2020. We fnd that pressing subjects such as fnancial concerns attract high levels of engagement, but not necessarily abusive dialogue. Rather, criticising authorities appears to attract higher levels of abuse during this period of the pandemic. In addi- tion, communicating about subjects like racism and inequality may result in accusa- tions of virtue signalling or pandering by some users. This work contributes to the wider understanding of abusive language online, in particular that which is directed at public ofcials. Keywords Online hate · Abusive speech · Natural language processing · Politics · COVID-19 · Twitter * Tracie Farrell [email protected] Genevieve Gorrell [email protected] Kalina Bontcheva [email protected] 1 University of Shefeld, Shefeld, UK Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Journal of Computational Social Science Introduction Social media can ofer a “temperature check” on which topics and issues are trend- ing for certain cross-sections of the public, and how they feel about them [21].
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • One Nation: Power, Hope, Community
    one nation power hope community power hope community Ed Miliband has set out his vision of One Nation: a country where everyone has a stake, prosperity is fairly shared, and we make a common life together. A group of Labour MPs, elected in 2010 and after, describe what this politics of national renewal means to them. It begins in the everyday life of work, family and local place. It is about the importance of having a sense of belonging and community, and sharing power and responsibility with people. It means reforming the state and the market in order to rebuild the economy, share power hope community prosperity, and end the living standards crisis. And it means doing politics in a different way: bottom up not top down, organising not managing. A new generation is changing Labour to change the country. Edited by Owen Smith and Rachael Reeves Contributors: Shabana Mahmood Rushanara Ali Catherine McKinnell Kate Green Gloria De Piero Lilian Greenwood Steve Reed Tristram Hunt Rachel Reeves Dan Jarvis Owen Smith Edited by Owen Smith and Rachel Reeves 9 781909 831001 1 ONE NATION power hope community Edited by Owen Smith & Rachel Reeves London 2013 3 First published 2013 Collection © the editors 2013 Individual articles © the author The authors have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1998 to be identified as authors of this work. All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical, chemical, mechanical, optical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beaconsfield, Phase
    Phase One Beaconsfield Land and property map book www.hs2.org.uk South West Hertfordshire Watford Co Const Boro Const Aylesbury Co Const Ruislip, Chesham and Northwood Amersham and Pinner Co Const Boro Const Wycombe Co Const Beaconsfield Co Const Maidenhead Uxbridge and Co Const South Ruislip Boro Const Slough Boro Const Hayes and Harlington Windsor Boro Const Co Const HS2 Ltd accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from LEEDS ! the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment Legend High Speed Two or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. MANCHESTER Limits of Land Subject to Safeguarding Direction Safeguarded Area: Surface ! Phase One Scale at A3: 1:75,000 © Crown copyright and database rights 2021 OS 100049190 Extended Homeowner Protection Zone 1 Safeguarded Area: Sub-surface Westminster Constituencies: I Derived from (...cite the scale of the BGS data used...) scale BGS Digital Data Extended Homeowner Protection Zone 2 under licence 2011/111 BP British Geological Survey. © NERC. Constituency Boundary Safeguarding and Property Scheme 0 2.5 Contains Environment Agency information © Environment Agency and database right. Extended Homeowner Protection Zone 3 Zone Maps BIRMINGHAM ! Registered in England. Registration number 06791686. © Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of Land Registry Rural Support Zone (RSZ) Registered office: 2 Snowhill, Queensway, Birmingham B4 6GA. Kilometers under delegated authority from the Controller of HMSO. Homeowner payment (HOP) zone 1 Beaconsfield Co Const This material was last updated on [date] and may not be copied, distributed, sold Joy Morrissey or published without the formal permission of Land Registry and Ordnance Survey.
    [Show full text]