DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix E – Archaeological Resources Assessment and Paleontological Resources Technical Report Prepared by Cogstone Dated March 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix E – Archaeological Resources Assessment and Paleontological Resources Technical Report Prepared by Cogstone Dated March 2016 Draft Environmental Impact Report Appendix E – Archaeological Resources Assessment and Paleontological Resources Technical Report Prepared by Cogstone dated March 2016 January 2017 Lyon Estate Subdivision ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE COTO DE CAZO SUBDIVISION EIR PROJECT, COMMUNITY OF COTO DE CAZA, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Mr. Bill H. Lyon 4695 MacArthur Court, 6th Floor, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Authors: Ian Scharlotta, André Simmons, Alyson Caine and Molly Valasik Principal Investigator: Sherri Gust March 2016 Cogstone Project Number: 3434 Type of Study: Archaeological assessment (Phase I including survey) Archaeological Sites: None USGS Quadrangle: Canada Gobernadora 7.5’ Area: 50-57 acres Key Words: Negative survey. Phase I Assessment, Juaneño Acjachemen 1518 West Taft Avenue Branch Offices cogstone.com Orange, CA 92865 San Diego – Riverside – Morro Bay - Oakland Toll free (888) 333-3212 Office (714) 974-8300 Federal Certifications 8(a), SDB, 8(m) WOSB State Certifications DBE, WBE, SBE, UDBE Coto de Caza TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ IV INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF STUDY ..................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT PERSONNEL .................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................ 3 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ............................................................................... 3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES ..................................................................... 3 STATE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION ............................................................................... 6 PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE ........................................................................................................... 7 ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 52 ............................................................................................................... 7 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 8 PREHISTORIC SETTING .................................................................................................................. 8 PROJECT AREA CULTURES ............................................................................................................ 9 ETHNOGRAPHY .......................................................................................................................... 12 HISTORIC SETTING ..................................................................................................................... 14 RECORD SEARCHES ............................................................................................................... 16 ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY .................................................................................................... 16 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION ........................................................................................... 19 ADDITIONAL SOURCES ............................................................................................................... 19 SURVEY ...................................................................................................................................... 20 SURVEY METHODS ..................................................................................................................... 20 SURVEY RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 21 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................... 26 REFERENCES CITED .............................................................................................................. 27 APPENDIX A: QUALIFICATIONS ....................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX B: NATIVE AMERICAN AB 52 CONSULTATION ....................................... 39 APPENDIX C: NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION ................................. 46 APPENDIX D: HISTORICAL SOCIETIES........................................................................... 55 Cogstone ii Coto de Caza LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. PROJECT VICINITY .................................................................................................................. 2 FIGURE 2. PROJECT AREA ...................................................................................................................... 4 FIGURE 3. PROJECT AERIAL .................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURE 6. MAP OF HISTORICAL LAND GRANTS ........................................................................................ 15 FIGURE 7. RIDGE LINE ALONG THE WESTERN PORTION OF PROJECT AREA, VIEW TO THE WEST ............................ 21 FIGURE 8. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT AREA FROM RIDGE LINE, VIEW TO THE EAST ............................................... 22 FIGURE 9. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT AREA SHOWING DENSITY OF ORANGE GROVES, VIEW TO THE NORTH ............... 22 FIGURE 10. OVERVIEW OF DRY CREEK RUNNING THROUGH ORANGE GROVE, VIEW TO THE NORTH ..................... 23 FIGURE 11. EXAMPLE OF GOOD GROUND VISIBILITY ALONG RIDGE, VIEW TO THE WEST .................................... 23 FIGURE 12. MAN-MADE WATER RETENTION FEATURE, VIEW TO THE EAST ..................................................... 24 FIGURE 13. SURVEY COVERAGE MAP ...................................................................................................... 25 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. CULTURE CHANGE CHRONOLOGY .............................................................................................. 10 TABLE 2. RECORDED SITES WITHIN A MILE RADIUS ..................................................................................... 16 TABLE 3. PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES WITHIN A ONE MILE RADIUS ................................................... 17 TABLE 4. ADDITIONAL SOURCES CONSULTED ............................................................................................ 19 TABLE 5. BLM LAND PATENTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT AREA ..................................................................... 20 Cogstone iii Coto de Caza EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to determine the potential effects on archaeological and historical resources of the proposed Coto de Caza Subdivision EIR Project in the community of Coto de Caza, Orange County, California (Figure 1). This study was requested by the County of Orange to meet their responsibility as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Coto de Caza is a gated residential community that includes golf course and equestrian facility amenities. The project proposes the subdivision of an existing large estate for development of 28 new residential lots on approximately 50-57 acres of land. The existing land is predominantly a citrus orchard. Proposed residential lots will be a minimum of one acre in size. An existing developed estate lot to the north and adjacent to the proposed project area will remain undisturbed. The Native American Heritage Commission indicated that there were no known sacred lands within one half mile of the project. Letters requesting information on any known heritage sites, and containing maps and project information were sent to 7 Native American contacts recommended by the Commission. Three tribal groups had also requested consultation with the County under AB 52 and were sent letters. No responses have been received to date. Cogstone conducted an intensive-level pedestrian survey of the proposed project area on October 8, 2015. Ground visibility was moderate to poor due to vegetation coverage, but varied substantially throughout the Project Area. Ground visibility along the creek is 50% to 25% due to dense vegetation and fallen leaves. Ground visibility within the orange grove is 75% to 100%. Ground visibility along the ridge line is 0% to 50% due to dense vegetation. No cultural resources were observed in the project area during the survey and nothing was collected. If unanticipated resources are discovered during construction, work should halt with 25 ft. of the discovery until it can be evaluated by an Orange County Certified Professional Archaeologist. If prehistoric resources are recovered, courtesy notification to the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachmen Nation who has made similar requests on other projects in the area, should be made by the archaeologist. Cogstone iv Coto de Caza INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF STUDY The purpose of this study was to determine the potential effects on archaeological and historical resources of the proposed Coto de Caza Subdivision EIR Project in the community of Coto de Caza, Orange County, California (Figure 1). This study was requested by the County of Orange to meet their responsibility as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan and Other Natural Disasters
    Laguna Beach Community Wildfire Protection Plan And Other Natural Disasters Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3 1. Laguna Beach History......................................................................................................... 3 2. Covered Area ...................................................................................................................... 3 3. CWPP Purpose .................................................................................................................... 3 II. CITY RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................. 3 1. Fire ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Floods ................................................................................................................................ 39 3. Tsunamis ........................................................................................................................... 41 4. Earthquakes ....................................................................................................................... 47 5. Evacuation Plan ................................................................................................................ 53 III. PUBLIC RESOURCES ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study with Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Assessment for the SR 55 Improvement Project Between I
    Chapter 2 Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 2.8 Hydrology and Floodplains 2.8.1 Regulatory Setting EO 11988 (Floodplain Management) directs all federal agencies to refrain from conducting, supporting, or allowing actions in floodplains unless it is the only practicable alternative. The FHWA requirements for compliance are outlined in 23 CFR 650 Subpart A. To comply, the following must be analyzed: • The practicability of alternatives to any longitudinal encroachments • Risks of the action • Impacts on natural and beneficial floodplain values • Support of incompatible floodplain development • Measures to minimize floodplain impacts and to preserve/restore any beneficial floodplain values affected by the project The base floodplain is defined as “the area subject to flooding by the flood or tide having a one percent chance of being exceeded in any given year.” An encroachment is defined as “an action within the limits of the base floodplain.” 2.8.2 Affected Environment This section is based on the Location Hydraulic Study State Route 55 Improvement Project From Interstate 5 to State Route 91 (LHS) (April 2018), the Water Quality Technical Memorandum (November 2018), Stormwater Data Report (March 2019), and the Preliminary Drainage Report State Route 55 Widening Project (October 2018) prepared for the proposed project. 2.8.2.1 Regional Hydrology The proposed project is located within the Santa Ana River hydrologic unit and within two subhydrologic areas: the Lower Santa Ana River and San Diego Creek, both of which are part of the East Coastal Plain Hydrologic Sub-Area (801.11). In addition, the proposed project is located within three watersheds: the Lower Santa River Watershed, Santiago Creek Watershed, and San Diego Creek Watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • LWHC Once Upon Laguna Woods
    Once Upon Laguna Woods by Dean O. Dixon Once upon a time in a magical land there were fiery volcanos, roiling seas, and fearsome animals. Then came warriors, conquerors, banishment, empires, slaves, wars, pirates, corruption, bandits, posses, lynching, ghosts, invasion, exploitation, riches, scandal and, yes, even happily ever after. Fiction? No. These are true stories about the land right under your feet in and around Laguna Woods. So what did happen once upon Laguna Woods? Well, are you up for some time travel? The beloved natural vistas from Laguna Woods reflect decades of conservation efforts that preserved tens of thousands of pristine acres from any future human development. You get to enjoy this in perpetuity without it ever being disturbed. Woods End Wilderness Preserve, Laguna Coast Wilderness Park, Aliso & Wood Canyons Wilderness Park, Crystal Cove State Park, Laguna Niguel Regional Park, and City of Irvine Open Space Preserve are contiguous in a synergistic display of your natural history. But what exactly do you see? Once Upon Laguna Woods February 27, 2016 page !2 of !60 Natural erosion has exposed up to 65 million years of rock strata laid down and compressed one layer atop another by eons of changes in the earth’s crust as influenced by climate, flora and fauna. Sand from deserts and beaches, mud from swamps and rivers, skeletons of sea and land creatures, recurrences of these, and still more are solidified and revealed like layers in a slice of cake for the delight of geologists and further study by anyone so inclined. Related tectonics further changed and are changing your area even today as the Atlantic Plate pushes the North American Plate westward into the Pacific Plate along that constant worry of yours, the San Andreas Fault.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F Archaeological Assessment
    Appendices Appendix F Archaeological Assessment Warner Avenue Widening from Main Street to Grand Avenue Draft EIR City of Santa Ana Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks January 2015 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE WARNER AVENUE FROM MAIN STREET TO GRAND AVENUE WIDENING PROJECT, PROJECT NO. 09-1749, CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: The Planning Center 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Authors: Amy Glover and Sherri Gust Principal Investigator: Sherri Gust Registered Professional Archaeologist Orange County Certified Professional Archaeologist May 2009; revised May 2013 Project Number: 1679 Type of Study: Archaeological Assessment Sites: None USGS Quadrangle: Tustin 7.5’ 1965 Area: 1 linear mile Key Words: Juaneño, Gabrielino, Orange County, Cultural Resources Survey 1518 West Taft Avenue Branch Offices cogstone.com Orange, CA 92865 West Sacramento - Morro Bay - Inland Empire – San Diego Office (714) 974-8300 Toll free (888) 497-0700 F-1 Warner Avenue Widening TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................... IV INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF STUDY ....................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Phase I Cultural Resources Report
    Santiago Basin Saddle Repair Project Appendix D Phase I Cultural Resources Report Phase I Cultural Resources Report Orange County Water District Santiago Basins Saddle Improvement Project Prepared for Daniel Bott Principal Planner Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, California 92708 Prepared by David M. Smith Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA Cultural Resources Director BonTerra Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 T: 714.751.7373 April 2016 Phase I Cultural Resources Report Orange County Water District Santiago Basins Saddle Improvement Project Submitted by: David M. Smith Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA Cultural Resources Director BonTerra Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707-8794 (714) 751-7373 Submitted to: Daniel Bott Principal Planner Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, California 92708 Key Words: Gabrieleno, 7.5 Minute Orange Quadrangle; T4S R9W Section 22 Santiago Basins Saddle Improvement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Federal Legislative Framework ...................................................................................... 1 3.0 Project Location and Description .................................................................................. 2 3.1 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................ 2
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment
    CREEKSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFT EIR CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRAN O Appendices Appendix D Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment September 2020 CREEKSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFT EIR CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE CREEKSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN, SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: PlaceWorks 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Authors: Sandy Duarte, B.A., Molly Valasik, M.A., Kim Scott, M.S. Principal Investigator: Molly Valasik, M.A., RPA, Orange County Certified Principal Archaeologist Kim Scott, M.S., Orange County Certified Principal Paleontologist Date January 2020 Cogstone Project Number: 4743 Type of Study: Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment Sites: None USGS Quadrangle: San Juan Capistrano 7.5’ Area: 15.3 acres Key Words: Negative survey, cultural resources assessment, paleontological resources assessment, late Miocene to early Pliocene Capistrano Formation, Pleistocene axial channel deposits 1518 West Taft Avenue Field Offices cogstone.com Orange, CA 92865 San Diego • Riverside • Morro Bay • Sacramento • Toll free 888-333-3212 Office (714) 974-8300 Arizona Federal Certifications WOSB, EDWOSB, SDB State Certifications DBE, WBE, SBE, UDBE D-1 Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment for the Creekside Specific Plan Project TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL PLAN APPENDIX December 2012 TABLE of CONTENTS
    County of Orange GENERAL PLAN APPENDIX December 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LAND USE ELEMENT Appendix III-1 Growth Management Program Guidelines …………………………………………… 1 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Appendix IV-1 Growth Management Transportation Implementation Manual ……………………… 9 Appendix IV-2 Planning Criteria for Determining Arterial Highway Classifications ……………….. 30 Appendix IV-3 Bikeway Designation Planning Guidelines ………………………………………….. 36 Appendix IV-4 County Designation Scenic Highways and Candidate Corridors ……………………. 38 Appendix IV-5 Scenic Highways Corridor Implementation Planning Guidelines …………………… 44 Appendix IV-6 List of Acronyms/Abbreviations …………………………………………………….. 48 RESOURCES ELEMENT Appendix VI-1 List of Acronyms/Abbreviations …………………………………………………….. 56 RECREATION ELEMENT Appendix VII-1 Local Park Implementation Plan Criteria: Private Parks, Facilities and Improvements 60 Appendix VII-2 Local Park Guidelines: Site Characteristics, Acquisition, Design, Maintenance & Funding 66 Appendix VII-3 Local Park Site Criteria ……………………………………………………………… 75 Appendix VII-4 Policy for Allocating Funds for Trail Development ………………………………… 81 Appendix VII-5 Trail Descriptions …………………………………………………………………… 85 Appendix VII-6 Staging Areas ……………………………………………………………………….. 109 Appendix VII-7 Trail Design Standards ……………………………………………………………… 115 Appendix VII-8 Regional Recreation Facilities Inventory …………………………………………… 119 Appendix VII-9 List of Acronyms/Abbreviations ……………………………………………………. 129 NOISE ELEMENT Appendix VIII-1 Noise Element Definitions and Acronyms …………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Commission Staff Report and Recommendation Regarding
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA - NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 (562) 590-5071 W13a Filed: 04/16/14 49th Day: N/A Staff: M. Alvarado-LB Staff Report: 07/28/17 Hearing Date: 08/09/17 STAFF REPORT: APPEAL - DE NOVO Appeal Number: A-5-LGB-14-0019 Applicant: Louis Longi Local Government: City of Laguna Beach Local Decision: Approval with Conditions Appellants: Devora Hertz, Jackie Gallagher, Audrey Prosser, Clean Water Now (Roger Butow) Project Location: 20412 & 20432 Laguna Canyon Road, City of Laguna Beach, Orange County APNs 629-051-23 and 629-051-02 Project Description: Demolition of single-family residence and artist’s studio; construction of a 36-ft. high (31 ft. above base flood elevation), 28-unit artists’ work/live project with approximately 17,192 sq. ft. of interior work/live area, 10,262 sq. ft. of exterior communal work area, a 504 sq. ft. retail art gallery, and a 45-stall parking garage; and a lot merger to combine the two lots into one. Eight units are reserved for low- income artists, and one unit is reserved for moderate-income artists (for 55 years). Staff Recommendation: Approval with Conditions _________ SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION Procedural Note: Subsequent to finding substantial issue, the Commission approved at a de-novo hearing a 30-unit Artist’s Live/Work project with ten (10) special conditions at the January 8, 2015 meeting. On March 16, 2015, Friends of the Canyon, an unincorporated association, sued the Coastal Commission on grounds of failure of several commissioners to properly disclose ex-parte communications, and the lack of substantial evidence to support the Commission’s findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Geomorphology of the Santa Ana Mountains
    Final Technical Report ACTIVE DEFORMATION AND EARTHQUAKE POTENTIAL OF THE SOUTHERN LOS ANGELES BASIN, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Award Number: 01HQGR0117 Recipient’s name: University of California - Irvine Sponsored Projects Administration 160 Administration Building, Univ. of CA - Irvine Irvine, CA 92697-1875 Principal investigator: Lisa B. Grant, Ph.D. Department of Environmental Analysis & Design 262 Social Ecology 1 University of California Irvine, CA 92697-7070 Program element: Research on earthquake occurrence and effects Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS award number 01HQGR0117. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. p. 1 Award number: 01HQGR0117 ACTIVE DEFORMATION AND EARTHQUAKE POTENTIAL OF THE SOUTHERN LOS ANGELES BASIN, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Eldon M. Gath, University of California, Irvine, 143 Social Ecology I, Irvine, CA, 92697-7070; tel: 949-824-5382, fax: 949-824-2056, email: [email protected] Eric E. Runnerstrom, University of California, Irvine, 143 Social Ecology I, Irvine, CA, 92697- 7070; tel: 949-824-5382, fax: 949-824-2056, email: [email protected] Lisa B. Grant (P.I.), University of California, Irvine, 262 Social Ecology I, Irvine, CA, 92697- 7070; tel: 949-824-5491, fax: 949-824-2056, email: [email protected] TECHNICAL ABSTRACT The Santa Ana Mountains (SAM) are a 1.7 km high mountain range that form the southeastern boundary of the Los Angeles basin between Orange and Riverside counties in southern California. The SAM have three well developed erosional surfaces preserved on them, as well as a suite of four fluvial fill terraces preserved in Santiago Creek, which is a drainage trapped between the uplifting SAM and a parallel Loma Ridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Laguna Hills Patriotic Summer
    2010 SUMMER | News Magazine & Activity Guide Laguna Hills Patriotic Summer What’s Inside? City Communications and Social Media Funding for Seniors Summer Festivities Dedication of Murals Environment A scene from War Brings Change mural. 2010 SUMMER NEwS MAgAzine & Activity GuidE City HAll HoURS: 8 am – 5 pm Monday – Friday f r o mA Message ENGiNEERiNG, PlANNiNG ANd t h e BUildiNG CoUNtER HoURS: c i t y 1 pm – 5:30 pm Monday – thursday As summer is upon us the City prepares for a 1 pm – 5 pm Friday season full of outdoor activities. the kick-off of laguna Hills’ Patriotic summer starts with the Regular City Council 12th annual laguna Hills Memorial day Half Meetings are held Marathon and 5K. the summer will heat up with on the second and the City’s Fourth of July Carnival, Festival and fourth tuesday of each Fireworks. the City is also offering a variety of month. summer day camps for kids ages six-fourteen. For more on these summer activities read traffic Commission pages four and five ofCity Views and look Meetings are held on on pages four and five of the activity guide the third Wednesday of located behind the newsmagazine. this issue January, March, May, also talks about the City’s commitment to keeping residents informed of local happenings July, September and through this mailing, the City Website and November. twitter. this issue also talks about what the City is doing to help seniors in laguna Hills as well Parks and Recreation as the Saddleback Valley. you can read more Commission Meetings about these stories on pages two and three.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX E Cultural Resources Assessment
    APPENDIX E Cultural Resources Assessment CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF THE LITTLE CORONA INFILTRATION PROJECT, NEWPORT BEACH, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Richard Beck Michael Baker/RBF Consulting Authors: Megan Wilson, M.A, Sherri Gust, M.S, and Alyson Caine, M.S. Principal Investigator: Sherri Gust, M.S., Orange County Certified Professional Archaeologist and Paleontologist January 2016 Cogstone Project Number: 3193 Type of Study: Phase I survey Archaeological Sites: None USGS Quadrangle: Laguna Beach 7.5’ Area: 0.1 acres Key Words: Gabrielino, Tongva, Negative Survey 1518 West Taft Avenue Branch Offices cogstone.com Orange, CA 92865 San Diego – Riverside – Morro Bay - Oakland Toll free 888-333-3212 Office (714) 974-8300 Federal Certifications 8(a), SDB, EDWOSB State Certifications DBE, WBE, SBE, UDBE Little Corona Infiltration TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... IV INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF STUDY ................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................................. 2 PROJECT PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Staging Area Signs
    STAGING AREA SIGNS Signs (19x27) will be placed at staging areas to alert the public of the pilot program prior to visitors beginning their activity. Trifold 11x17 maps designating the pilot trails will be available in a brochure holder below the sign. TRAILS SUBCOMMITTEE A. PILOT PROJECT DEPLOYMENT– TRAIL USE DESIGNATIONS April 20, 2021 TRAIL SIGNS Signs (12x18) will be placed at both ends of a pilot trail to alert the public of the pilot program and new trail designations. TRAILS SUBCOMMITTEE A. PILOT PROJECT DEPLOYMENT– TRAIL USE DESIGNATIONS April 20, 2021 TRAILS SUBCOMMITTEE A. PILOT PROJECT DEPLOYMENT– TRAIL USE DESIGNATIONS April 20, 2021 11x17 maps designating the pilot trails will be available at each PILOT TRAIL MAPS staging area and distributed at the entry gate at Santiago Oaks. TRAILS SUBCOMMITTEE A. PILOT PROJECT DEPLOYMENT– TRAIL USE DESIGNATIONS April 20, 2021 April 20, 2021 OC Parks Trail Subcommitte - IV.A Pilot Project REGIONAL PARK DAY USE: 7:00 A.M. – SUNSET OFFICE HOURS: Santiago Oaks Regional Park Trail Guide: MON. – FRI. 8:00 A.M. – 4:00 P.M. CACTUS CANYON TRAIL • CHUTES RIDGELINE TRAIL PERALTA HILLS TRAIL • PONY TRAIL • YUCCA RIDGE TRAIL PILOT TRAIL PROJECT multi-use multi-use multi-use multi-use multi-use Anaheim Hills Trail: DIFFICULT 1.5 miles Hawk Trail: DIFFICULT .31 miles Oak Trail: DIFFICULT .71 miles Sage Ridge Trail: MODERATE .26 miles Wilderness Trail: EASY .48 miles multi-use hiking only hiking only multi-use multi-use Arizona Crossing Trail: EASY .04 miles Historic Dam Trail: EASY .23 miles Pacifica
    [Show full text]