American City Business Journals - Not for Commercial Use

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American City Business Journals - Not for Commercial Use JANUARY 22, 2010 | SUPPLEMENT TO THE SACRAMENTO BUSINESS JOURNAL Years of Business © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use S PONSORED BY: PROVIDED BY US — DISTRIBUTED BY YOU. ® SHAREPOINT 2010 — • ASSESSMENTS • BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY ROADMAPS • DEPLOYMENTS • TECHNICAL EDUNARSSM • DESIGN & BRANDING • DASHBOARDS • DEVELOPMENT & INTEGRATION • SECURITY © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use IN COOPERATION WITH: WWW.KIEFERCONSULTING.COM 916.357.6767 © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use S-2 | 25 YEARS OF BUSINESS SACRAMENTO BUSINESS JOURNAL | JANUARY 22, 2010 25 events, people and companies Contents | from the past quarter-century S-4 Publisher’s foreword S-30 Galleria at Roseville S-6 Sacramento Kings S-32 Elk Grove S-8 Joe Serna Jr. S-34 Raley Field S-10 Air base closures S-36 The state budget S-12 Angelo Tsakopoulos S-38 Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger S-14 Tower Records S-40 Casinos S-16 Dan Crowley S-42 Housing on the march S-18 The Money Store S-44 Downtown hotels S-20 The Benvenuti family S-46 1984 S-22 Midtown S-47 Green biz S-24 Raley’s Inc. S-48 The McClatchy Co. S-26 Southwest Airlines S-50 Light rail S-28 Buzz Oates S-52 The Blueprint © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use ■ 25 Years of Business is published by The Sacramento Business Journal. Copyright © 2010 by The Sacramento Business Journal, 1400 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95818 • 916-447-7661 • sacramento.bizjournals.com Publisher: Joanna Wessman • EDITORIAL: Editor: Ron Trujillo • Senior associate editor/ Julie Sherry • Marketplace manager: Judy Porter • Advertising coordinator: Chan Saelee 25 Years of Business designer: Jennifer Myers • Assistant managing editor: Gary Chazen • PRODUCTION: Art/Production director: Mike Grover • Graphic designer/Illustrator: Jeff • Associate editor: Suzanne Webb Jeter • Assistant associate editor: Beth Davis • Senior Byrd • Graphic designer: Heather Witzens • MARKETING AND SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: reporter: Kathy Robertson • Reporters: Mark Anderson, Kelly Johnson, Michael Shaw Circulation and marketing director: Delania Lustig • Marketing coordinator: Crystal and Melanie Turner • Senior research director: Sharon Havranek • Senior research Dillard • Circulation sales executives: Debra Roak and Robert Robinson • Outside sales assistant: Elizabeth Eccles • Research assistant: Mary Alice Coverdale • Photographer: executive: Lauren Edvalson • ADMINISTRATION: Business manager: Bea Franchetto • Dennis McCoy • ADVERTISING: Advertising director: Mike Gannon • Senior account Events marketing manager: Renee Siden • Administrative coordinator: Shannon Mok • executive: Carol Kracht • Account executives: Tiffany Carlson, Teri Gorman and Receptionist: Meuy Saechao • Cover design: Jeff Byrd, photo by Dennis McCoy The “Big Build” at the Sacramento International Airport is one of the many ongoing projects of WKA. Corporate offices located Wallace-Kuhl & Associates, Inc. in West Sacramento A Firm Built on Strength and Reliability for 25 Years Wallace-Kuhl and Associates (WKA) has been a commanding force in geotechnical and geologic engineering, environmental and ecological services, construction testing and inspection for 25 years. Since our company was founded in 1984, we have proudly employed the finest skilled engineers, geologists, environmental scientists, engineer technicians and construction inspectors. Over the years, WKA has expanded our facilities to be able to serve Northern California and Northern Nevada. WKA's reputation and strength is based on our philosophy of building long-term client relation- ships and providing practical, cost-effective solutions. © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use As Wallace-Kuhl and Associates celebrate our 25th year anniversary, we would like to thank our loyal clients and congratulate the Sacramento Business Journal for 25 years of serving our business community. 3251 Beacon Blvd. Suite 300 West Sacramento CA 95691 Voice: (916) 372-1434 Fax: (916) 372-2565 www.wallace-kuhl.com GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • SOIL AND MATERIALS TESTING • CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING • REMEDIATION SERVICE S-4 | 25 YEARS OF BUSINESS SACRAMENTO BUSINESS JOURNAL | JANUARY 22, 2010 Foreword | 25 Years of Business he story began 25 years ago, when a small, Do we havee a cel-cel- weekly business publication chain in Kansas ebration in ourur honorhonor TCity, Mo., decided to invest in a business jour- as we have inn thethe papastst nal in Sacramento. or a publicationion rec- The general attitude initially: “This isn’t a busi- ognizing all ofof our ness town, what are you thinking?” accomplishmentsments We often become what we believe, but fortu- over a quarterer of nately a group of entrepreneurs chose to ignore a century? Afterfter the naysayers in this community and set out to much discus-- tell the stories — good, bad and sometimes boring. sion, we chosese They profiled the people and events and to acknowledgedge in doing so provided the business intel- and recognizeze ligence necessary to support a dynamic the business economy. community Fast forward a quarter-century for providingg (sounds much longer than 25 years, the stories huh?), and the Sacramento region has and demon- grown into a strong business community. strating the We’ve learned a lot along the way. And appreciation of PUBLISHER’S there is much more to learn. the newspaperer for tellingtelling FOREWORD Certainly, the past couple of years those stories throughthrough your read-read- presented us with the most challenging ership, advertisingti i andd partnershipst hi ffor JOANNA The cover of the economy we’ve ever faced. Hopefully, many years. WESSMAN May 5, 1985, it also presented us with lessons we’ll This is just the beginning of the story. Business Journal carry as we shape the next 25 years. There is much more to tell. And, as we announces Within this publication, our award-winning have in the past, we’ll be here to tell your Dan Kennedy newsroom, with input from our readers, chose 25 stories as you shape our next quarter-cen- as publisher. stories that have shaped the region. This certainly tury of business. is not all-inclusive, as I’m sure you know of many The information is being delivered in dif- more to be told. In fact, if you would like to share ferent — and more — ways than 25 years ago, but some of those stories, you can e-mail editor we’re committed to continue to report fairly and as Ron Trujillo at [email protected]. thoroughly as we have in the past. We struggled with how to recognize this I hope you will join me in believing the future is momentous occasion. bright. We have an opportunity to shape our next wave of prosperity. We’ll celebrate our accom- plishments and the les- sons learned, and yet to be learned. And, we’ll be here to © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial usetell your stories. In 25 years of covering business in Sacramento, photographer Dennis McCoy has documented the closure of McClellan Air Force base, the growth of Elk Grove, Rancho Seco, changes in the skyline, the birth and death of Tower Records and changes in Curtis Park (clockwise from top left). 8IFOZPVBSFJOWPMWFEJOBCVTJOFTTEJTQVUFUIFSFBSFNBOZPQUJPOTBWBJMBCMFPUIFSUIBOUSJBM 4PNFDBTFTBSFSJQFGPSFBSMZSFTPMVUJPO0UIFSTDBOCFEJTQPTFEPGWJBNPUJPOTPSOFHPUJBUJPO *U UBLFT B TFBTPOFE BUUPSOFZ UP SFDPHOJ[F UIFTF PQQPSUVOJUJFT CSJOH NBUUFST UP B TQFFEZ DPODMVTJPOBOEBWPJEUJNFDPOTVNJOHBOEFYQFOTJWFMJUJHBUJPO"U1PSUFS4DPUUBMMXFEPJTMJUJHBUJPOp DPOWJODJOHMZ EFDJTJWFMZ DPODMVTJWFMZ © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use 5)&$-&"3$)0*$&8)&/3&46-54."55&3 NMPRCPQAMRR AMK S-6 | 25 YEARS OF BUSINESS SACRAMENTO BUSINESS JOURNAL | JANUARY 22, 2010 Team brought worldwide Sacramento Kings | recognition to region hen the Sacramento Kings ar- rived 25 years ago, denizens real- Wized the capital region could be a major-league city, and not just in sports. “The Kings have helped give our re- gion pride, swagger and a sense of self,” said Matt Mahood, president and chief executive officer of the Sacramento Metro Chamber. “It brings the entire community to- gether for one cause,” said Gavin Ma- loof, Kings co-owner. Originally, Gregg Lukenbill and his partners thought they would bring ma- jor-league sports to Sacramento with professional baseball. They bought 435 acres of farmland in North Natomas, but the City Council and voters rejected the rezoning necessary for a ballpark. “Our biggest chal- Developer Gregg Lukenbill, right, seen here in 1986 with Rann Haight, who designed Arco STORY BY lenge: The people of Arena, helped bring the Kings to Sacramento — and housing to North Natomas. KELLY JOHNSON Sacramento could not believe we could PHOTO BY ever be a major- continually pans over the downtown, and pays about $1 million in property DENNIS McCOY league city,” said the Tower Bridge, the confluence of taxes. The company gave up its Sac- Greg Van Dusen, the Sacramento and American Rivers, ramento Monarchs women’s basket- who worked for Lukenbill and helped or the snow-capped Sierra Mountains ball franchise in November. The Mon- bring the Kings from Kansas City, Mo. — showing off some of the region’s archs were one of the WNBA’s original A National Basketball Association best physical eight teams in 1997, and won the league executive suggested Sacramento try for attributes.” championship in 2005 and the Western basketball instead. The team has ‘The Kings have Conference in 2006. The new owners of the Kansas City featured several helped give our The focus these days is whether the Kings brought the team to Sacramento all-star players Kings need a new place to play, where for the 1985-86 season. The Kings moved who were active- region pride, that new home would be and who would into the new Arco Arena for the 1988-89 ly involved in the pay for it. Cal Expo has been talking season. For years, the Kings have been community, such swagger and a with the NBA for two years about the known for their loyal fans, and until as Vlade Divac and sense of self.’ possibility of using a basketball arena last season, the team had an impressive Chris Webber. and commercial development to pay for string of sold-out games.
Recommended publications
  • City of Elk Grove Public Transit Fares
    AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.2 CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: Consider 1) approving a proposal by MV Transportation for a new reverse commute service rate of $25/hour; and 2) authorizing staff to notice new fare rates and services for reverse commuting MEETING DATE: January 25, 2012 PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT HEAD: Richard Shepard, Public Works Director / City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff recommends the City Council consider: 1) Approving a proposal by MV Transportation for a new reverse commute service rate of $25/hour; and 2) Authorizing staff to notice new fare rates and services for reverse commuting. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On December 14, 2011, City Council heard an item discussing costs of implementing reverse commute services between Elk Grove and Downtown Sacramento in order to support the relocation of the California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS) Department. Consistent with existing contract requirements, it was estimated that the net cost of this service would be approximately $94,000 per year. This net cost was estimated assuming the following: 1 Elk Grove City Council January 25, 2012 Page 2 of 6 Estimated Cost of New Reverse Commute Service New service costs at the $190,000 contracted rate of $53.09/hour Less new revenue based on 100 new monthly permits at a reduced <$96,000> cost of $80/month Estimated net annual cost $94,000 Since a majority of the reverse commute service would come from using buses that are “dead-heading” (returning empty), Council requested that staff negotiate with MV Transportation, Inc. (MV) to reduce the contracted rate to a level that would make the service revenue neutral to the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridership Report (October 2019)
    Ridership Report (October 2019) Year to Date Summary Category FY20 YTD FY19YTD Difference % Change Trailing 12 Month Trend Bus 3,518,921 3,415,852 103,069 3.0% 11,500,000 Light Rail 3,848,176 3,641,112 207,064 5.7% Rail Bus System Total 7,367,097 7,056,964 310,133 4.4% 11,000,000 10,500,000 Current Month Summary 10,000,000 Category October 2019 October 2018 Difference % Change Bus 1,059,668 1,014,352 45,316 4.5% 9,500,000 Light Rail 1,063,740 1,025,613 38,127 3.7% System Total 2,123,408 2,039,965 83,443 4.1% 9,000,000 Daily Summary Category October 2019 October 2018 Difference % Change Bus (M-F) 41,415 40,275 1,140 2.8% Bus (Sat) 15,390 13,266 2,124 16.0% Bus (Sun) 10,371 7,915 2,456 31.0% October Ridership by Mode Light Rail (M-F) 40,939 40,510 429 1.1% 6% Light Rail (Sat) 17,127 13,500 3,627 26.9% Light Rail Light Rail (Sun) 12,229 9,500 2,729 28.7% Fixed Route 48% Other Services E-Tran Ridership Summary (E-Van included) 46% Category Current Year Prior Year Difference % Change E-Tran (YTD) 280,319 266,440 13,879 5.2% E-Tran (Monthly) 84,775 81,648 3,127 3.8% Other services include E-Tran, Folsom, SmaRT Ride, CBS and Special Services E-Tran (Weekday) 3,560 3,426 134 3.9% Route Level Ridership Comparison (Bus) Weelday Route Comparison Saturday Route Comparison Route Oct 2019 Oct 2018 Difference % Change Route Oct 2019 Oct 2018 Difference % Change 1 2,067 2,190 (124) -6% 1 768 777 (9) -1% 11 972 715 257 36% 11 447 282 165 59% 13 678 315 362 115% 13 426 - 426 15 795 1,215 (420) -35% 15 381 558 (176) -32% 19 423 658 (234) -36% 19 209 271
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom Short Range Transit Plan Update Project Appendix G.1 Public
    Folsom Short Range Transit Plan Update Project Appendix G .1 Public Comments Summary BUS SERVICE Commuter Feeder Service to Folsom Light Rail Stations Feeder bus essential for Folsom residents to take advantage of light rail; should run all day. Need fast, quick feeders to/from light rail during peak commuter hours only . Local feeder routes need to be within walking distance of residences, not just businesses. Draft bus service plan seems to cater to commercial traffic much more than commuters . Why can't the commuter public be covered during peak time (i.e ., 6 AM - 7 :30 PM & 4 PM - 5 :30 PM) and commercial traffic off-peak. Consider different routes for commuters (5am - 9 am, 3pm - 7pm) than for in-town customers (run all day). Commute routes should be designed to serve largest neighborhood populations possible and travel quickly to L.R. stations . Daytime in-town routes would serve major retail, city hall, college, etc. Early a.m. pick up (bus stop) at East Natoma & Briggs Ranch to light rail to get me to work by 6:30 a.m. Maintain service on Folsom-Auburn Road from Folsom Dam Road and provide feeder service to Historic Folsom light rail station. Add a peak-only loop up Folsom-Auburn, Oak Avenue Parkway, American River Canyon, Greenback, right on Folsom-Auburn, up unused center lane ramp to the Historic Folsom light rail station. Residents in Orangevale seemed to get better service even though they already have current RT service ; RT and Folsom could make arrangements so Folsom would no longer have to loop out to Madison/Main (e .g.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Minutes TCC Meeting 4-28-21
    TCC Agenda April 28, 2021 Transit Coordinating Committee April 28, 2021 – TCC 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Hosted via Zoom Members of the public wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at the beginning of the meeting. We ask that members of the public request to speak and keep their remarks brief. Testimony will be limited to a total of ten (10) minutes. Conference Call Option – SACOG Zoom Meeting 3 - Join Zoom Meeting via laptop, computer, or smartphone: https://zoom.us/j/96333495161 Meeting ID: 963 3349 5161. Join with one tap mobile +16699009128, 96333495161# US. Dial in with your phone +1 669 900 9128 US, +1 669 219 2599 US, +1 651 372 8299 US, 888 475 4499 US Toll-free, 877 853 5257 US Toll-free. Meeting ID: 963 3349 5161. Please do not put your phone on hold during the meeting; instead please hang up and call back when you’re free. Attendees: Glenda Marsh, public transit advocate/SMART Lisa Cappellari, Paratransit, Inc. James Drake, SacRT Jose Perez, YCTD Keith Martin, Yuba-Sutter Transit Mikki McDaniel, SCT/Link Jamie Wright, Placer County David Smith, Caltrans D3 Brett Bernegger, SacRT Mike Costa, e-tran Mike Dour, Roseville Transit Kristen Mazur, YCTD Erik Reitz, SacRT Matt Mauk, El Dorado County Transit Tiffani Fink, Paratransit, Inc. Will Garner, Placer County Transit Brian James, El Dorado County Transit Virginia Wieneke, ACC Rides Leah Barrett, 50 Corridor TMA Ed Scofield, Roseville Transit Allison Winter, Roseville Transit Sabrina Bradbury, SACOG Mike Rosson, SACOG Chris Dougherty, SACOG Caroline Payne, SACOG Nicholas Whitty, TransLoc Nirit Glazer, LookingBus Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • GOLD Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    GOLD light rail time schedule & line map GOLD Downtown - Folsom View In Website Mode The GOLD light rail line (Downtown - Folsom) has 6 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K Station (Nb): 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM (2) Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →Sacramento Valley Station (Wb): 5:00 AM - 9:30 PM (3) Sacramento Valley Station (Eb) →Historic Folsom Station (Eb): 3:49 AM - 10:19 PM (4) Sacramento Valley Station (Eb) →Sunrise Station (Eb): 4:04 AM - 10:49 PM (5) Sunrise Station (Wb) →8th & K Station (Nb): 5:58 PM - 6:58 PM (6) Sunrise Station (Wb) →Sacramento Valley Station (Wb): 4:58 AM - 5:28 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest GOLD light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next GOLD light rail arriving. Direction: Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K GOLD light rail Time Schedule Station (Nb) Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K Station (Nb) 25 stops Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 8:00 PM - 9:30 PM Monday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Historic Folsom Station (Wb) 300 Reading St, Folsom Tuesday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Glenn Station (Wb) Wednesday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Thursday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Iron Point Station (Wb) Friday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Hazel Station (Wb) Saturday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Sunrise Station (Wb) Cordova Town Center Station (Wb) GOLD light rail Info Zinfandel Station (Wb) Direction: Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K Mather Field/Mills Station (Wb) Station (Nb) Stops: 25 Trip Duration: 55 min Butterƒeld Station (Wb) Line Summary: Historic Folsom Station
    [Show full text]
  • City of Folsom Core Values, Goals and Appendix H Performance Measures
    City of Folsom Core Values, Goals and Appendix H Performance Measures Core Values 1) Integrity - We act with integrity, doing what is legally and ethically correct. We recommend the right course of action even if it is unpopular. 2) Professionalism - We are committed to excellence. We are responsive and accountable . 3) Teamwork - Collaboration, communication and cooperation are essential to our success. We consider all stakeholders to be an integral part of serving the public. 4) Trust and Respect - We are free to express opinions, we listen to understand and we encourage responsible decision-making at all levels . 5) Innovation - We foster innovation as a means to achieve quality and cost effectiveness . We value employees who demonstrate initiative and creativity. 6) Workplace of Choice - We have a sense of purpose, take pride in accomplishments, demonstrate compassion for each other and celebrate our successes . Goals 1) Fiscal Management - Ensure and promote the long-term financial health of the City of Folsom. 2) Organizational Efficiency - Create a strong corporate culture emphasizing customer service, professionalism, cost efficiency and accountability . 3) Land Use and Planning - Plan future development to meet the needs of residents and businesses in terms of jobs-housing balance, environmental considerations, equal housing opportunities, and quality of life. 4) Transportation and Traffic - Provide transportation services that will meet mobility needs, maintain existing transportation infrastructure, and provide mitigation programs to reduce traffic impacts on neighborhoods . 5) Infrastructure - Provide and maintain sewer and water infrastructure to meet the City's existing and future capacity needs . 6) Public Safety/Emergency Service - Provide appropriate levels of public safety services to protect our citizens and ensure a high level of response to any emergency .
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak/Folsom Light Rail Corridor Project Folsom Extension Station Fact Sheet
    Amtrak/Folsom Light Rail Corridor Project Folsom Extension Station Fact Sheet The Sacramento Regional Transit District’s 7.3-mile extension from Sunrise Boulevard to Historic Downtown Folsom was designed to improve public transit service within a 23-mile corridor following Highway 50 between the Amtrak Station in Downtown Sacramento and the city of Folsom. The $261 million Amtrak/Folsom Corridor Project consists of four areas of improvement including 10.7 miles of additional track, 10 stations, enhanced signaling and 14 new light rail vehicles. Completed in 2006, the Amtrak/Folsom Corridor Project added more than 6,000 daily passengers. Hazel Station 12500 Folsom Blvd., Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 Park-and-Ride: 432-space park-and-ride lot Points of Intrest: Nimbus Winery Mall, Garbeau’s Dinner Theater, shopping, dining Area: Retail, entertainment, residential, major employer Glenn Station Transit Oriented Development Opportunities: Com- 1025 Glenn Drive, Folsom, CA 95630 muter supportive: residential, retail, office Development Opportunities: Some vacant parcels; Park-and-Ride: 165-space park-and-ride lot housing, retail, and office Area: Retail, Residential Architect: Acanthus Studio, Inc. Bus Connection: Folsom Stage Line Artist: Sam Tubiolo, “Transitions” Architect: Acanthus Studio, Inc. Station Ammenties: 10 Bike rental lockers Artist: Charlotte Cooper, “Oak Leaf Fall” Iron Point Station Historic Folsom Station 150 Iron Point Road, Folsom, CA 95630 930 Leidesdorff Street, Folsom, CA 95630 Park-and-Ride: 216-space park-and-ride lot Park-and-Ride: 102 spaces in 3 park-and-ride lots Points of Intrest: Folsom Premium Outlets, Century Points of Interest: Lake Natoma, American River Bike Trail, Folsom 14 Theatre, Folsom Visitors Center, Lake Natoma, Folsom Railroad Museum, Folsom Powerhouse, Folsom Chamber of Commerce, shopping, dining, hotels shopping, dining, hotels Area: Retail, entertainment, residential Bus Connections: Folsom Stage Line Bus Connection: Folsom Stage Line Area: Retail, entertainment, residential, major employer Architect: Acanthus Studio, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Sacramento Regional Transit District 5-Year Capital Plan (FY 2008 – FY 2012) Table of Contents Section I: Introduction & Overview • Overview.............................................................................................................. I-1 • Process to Develop the 5-Year Capital Plan ............................................................ I-2 • Structure of the 5-Year Capital Plan........................................................................ I-3 • District Profile .........................................................................................................I-4 to I-5 • Funding Summary...........................................................................................................I-6 • Funding Sources .............................................................................................................I-7 • Guiding Documents ................................................................................I-8 to I-10 Section II: 5-Year Capital Plan Summary (FY 2008 – FY 2012) • 5-Year Plan Index...................................................................... Index-1 to Index-6 • 5-Year Plan Project Summaries .......................................................... II-1 to II-106 Tier I: Fund thru FY 2012: System Expansion: Light Rail: Northeast Corridor Enhancements (Phase 1) II-1 South Sacramento Phase 2 Light Rail Extension II-2 Downtown-Natomas-Airport Light Rail Extension II-4 Fleet Program: LR Vehicle Mid-Life Overhauls/Improvements: Siemens Light Rail Vehicle Mid-Life
    [Show full text]
  • Review the Draft Network Integration Plan Here
    Draft Network Integration Plan Network Integration Plan June 8, 2021 Executive Summary The 2018 California State Rail Plan articulates a vision of intercity rail, commuter rail, and local mass transit integration, making the rail system easier to access and use. To further this vision, the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) have been funding rail integration plans in various parts of the state to better integrate transit with the state rail system. The Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) Network Integration Plan is one of those plans. SacRT Network Integration Vision The common theme running through all state-sponsored Network Integration Plans is how to provide better connections between local transit and the state rail system. In Sacramento, that system consists of the Capitol Corridor and the San Joaquins intercity trains, which are sponsored by Caltrans and operated by their respective Joint Powers Authorities. In the future, two new San Joaquins roundtrips will be added on the Union Pacific Railroad’s Sacramento Subdivision, stopping at a Midtown Station along the 20th Street corridor. Additionally, the Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) commuter rail service, operating today between Stockton and San Jose, is planning an extension to Sacramento with multiple arrivals and departures. These trains also will stop at the Midtown Station. SacRT serves Sacramento Valley Station (SVS) today with the Gold Line light rail transit (LRT) service and two local bus routes, the 30 and the 38. The Gold Line operates with mostly 15-minute headways between SVS and Sunrise and 30-minute headways between Sunrise and Folsom.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary City of Folsom Short-Range Transit Plan Update This transit planning document has been prepared for the City of Folsom to meet State and Federal planning requirements, to provide a management tool and a policy guideline for on-going development of the City's transit system. Typically, short-range transit plans are updated about every five to seven years. The last short-range transit plan (SRTP) for the City of Folsom was prepared in 1999 for fiscal years 1999-2000 through FY2004/05 . This plan has been prepared to cover FY 2005/06 through FY 2009/10. The planning process for this SRTP update began about 12 months ago with an initial meeting of SACOG and Folsom Stage Line staff. Background research was conducted that included identifying the study area in terms of geography, community and demographic characteristics (Chapter 1). The existing Folsom transit services were analyzed and ridership trends were identified (Chapter 2). An analysis of transit demand based on the mobility needs of target population segments was performed (Chapter 3). An on-board passenger survey was conducted on Folsom Stage Line downtown commuter routes, Butterfield light rail connector route, local fixed route (Route 10) and Dial-A-Ride service (Chapter 3). Two on-line surveys were also conducted, one with Intel, the largest employer located in Folsom, and the other with Franchise Tax Board employees who live in Folsom and work at FTB located adjacent to the Butterfield light rail station in Sacramento . The survey results were helpful in the development of a restructured local fixed-route bus system to provide connections with the RT light rail system at the three new Folsom light rail stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridership Report (August 2019)
    Ridership Report (August 2019) Year to Date Summary Rolling 24 Month Trend Category FY20 YTD FY19YTD Difference % Change 12,000,000 Bus** 1,542,508 1,530,603 11,905 0.8% Rail Bus Light Rail 1,859,238 1,700,126 159,112 9.4% 11,500,000 System Total 3,401,746 3,230,729 171,017 5.3% 11,000,000 10,500,000 Current Month Summary 10,000,000 Category August 2019* August 2018 Difference % Change 9,500,000 Bus** 806,687 815,472 (8,785) -1.1% 9,000,000 Light Rail 946,115 927,742 18,373 2.0% Jul18 Jul19 Jan18 System Total 1,752,802 1,743,214 9,588 0.6% Jan19 Sep17 Sep18 Nov17 Nov18 Mar18 Mar19 May18 May19 *August 2019 had 1 less weekday than August 2018. Accounts for approximately 2.3% reduction in ridership Daily Summary August Ridership by Mode 2% Category August 2019 August 2018 Difference % Change Bus (M-F) 32,379 32,138 241 0.7% Light Rail Bus (Sat) 12,425 11,499 927 8.1% Fixed Route Bus (Sun) 7,578 7,404 174 2.4% 44% Other Services 54% Light Rail (M-F) 37,374 36,330 1,044 2.9% Light Rail (Sat) 15,940 13,300 2,640 19.8% Light Rail (Sun) 10,994 9,600 1,394 14.5% Etran services will be included in the summary next month. August ridership was flat. **Bus includes Fixed Route, CBS, SmaRT Ride, Folsom Fixed Route, Folsom DAR and other special services, Folsom ridership not complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridership Report (January 2020)
    Ridership Report (January 2020) FY20 Year to Date Summary Category FY20 YTD FY19 YTD Difference % Change Trailing 12 Month Trend Bus 6,172,715 5,812,472 360,242 6.2% 11,500,000 Light Rail 6,538,014 6,185,385 352,629 5.7% Rail Bus System Total 12,710,729 11,997,857 712,871 5.9% 11,000,000 10,500,000 Current Month Summary 10,000,000 Category January 2020 January 2019 Difference % Change Bus 909,004 813,453 95,551 11.7% 9,500,000 Light Rail 907,018 890,563 16,455 1.8% System Total 1,816,022 1,704,016 112,006 6.6% 9,000,000 Daily Summary Category January 2020 January 2019 Difference % Change Bus (M-F) 37,527 34,044 3,483 10.2% Bus (Sat) 14,597 11,369 3,228 28.4% Bus (Sun) 10,265 7,098 3,167 44.6% January Ridership by Mode Light Rail (M-F) 37,016 35,860 1,156 3.2% 6% Light Rail (Sat) 15,361 16,400 (1,039) -6.3% Light Rail Light Rail (Sun) 10,869 11,400 (531) -4.7% Fixed Route 49% Other Services 45% E-Tran Ridership Summary (E-Van included) Category Current Year Prior Year Difference % Change E-Tran (YTD) 466,820 439,796 27,024 6.1% Other services include E-Tran, Folsom, SmaRT Ride, CBS E-Tran (Monthly) 65,292 57,380 7,912 13.8% and Special Services E-Tran (Weekday) 2,996 2,613 383 14.7% Route Level Ridership Comparison (Bus) Weekday Route Comparison Saturday Route Comparison Route Jan 2020 Jan 2019 Difference % Change Route Jan 2020 Jan 2019 Difference % Change 1 1,651 1,562 89 6% 1 700 774 (74) -10% 11 929 589 340 58% 11 452 265 187 70% 13 716 240 476 199% 13 464 - 464 15 737 1,042 (305) -29% 15 410 494 (84) -17% 19 364 581 (217) -37% 19
    [Show full text]