City of Folsom Core Values, Goals and Appendix H Performance Measures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City of Folsom Core Values, Goals and Appendix H Performance Measures City of Folsom Core Values, Goals and Appendix H Performance Measures Core Values 1) Integrity - We act with integrity, doing what is legally and ethically correct. We recommend the right course of action even if it is unpopular. 2) Professionalism - We are committed to excellence. We are responsive and accountable . 3) Teamwork - Collaboration, communication and cooperation are essential to our success. We consider all stakeholders to be an integral part of serving the public. 4) Trust and Respect - We are free to express opinions, we listen to understand and we encourage responsible decision-making at all levels . 5) Innovation - We foster innovation as a means to achieve quality and cost effectiveness . We value employees who demonstrate initiative and creativity. 6) Workplace of Choice - We have a sense of purpose, take pride in accomplishments, demonstrate compassion for each other and celebrate our successes . Goals 1) Fiscal Management - Ensure and promote the long-term financial health of the City of Folsom. 2) Organizational Efficiency - Create a strong corporate culture emphasizing customer service, professionalism, cost efficiency and accountability . 3) Land Use and Planning - Plan future development to meet the needs of residents and businesses in terms of jobs-housing balance, environmental considerations, equal housing opportunities, and quality of life. 4) Transportation and Traffic - Provide transportation services that will meet mobility needs, maintain existing transportation infrastructure, and provide mitigation programs to reduce traffic impacts on neighborhoods . 5) Infrastructure - Provide and maintain sewer and water infrastructure to meet the City's existing and future capacity needs . 6) Public Safety/Emergency Service - Provide appropriate levels of public safety services to protect our citizens and ensure a high level of response to any emergency . 7) Recreation and Culture - Provide recreational and cultural services that meet the needs of our community. 8) Economic Development - Enhance the City's economic and redevelopment programs to provide a stable, dependable, and diversified economic base. City of Folsom Short-Range Transit Plan Update Final Report, September 2005 Appendix H, Page 277 City of Folsom Core Values, Goals and Appendix H Performance Measures TABLE A-12 City of Folsom Strategic Plan Goal 4: Transportation and Traffic Strategy/Action Time Frame Short (less than 2 years) Medium (2-5 years) Long (more than 5 years) Transportation 4 .17 Update the City Circulation Element Short 4 .18 Implement a Trip Reduction Program Short 4 .19 Review and improve public transit operations Short 4 .20 Develop and implement alternative modes Short 4 .21 Develop and implement an Intelligent Transportation Systems Short-Medium (ITS) program Light Rail 4 .26 Create fare and other ridership incentives for use of the light rail Medium system 4 .27 Support future light rail extension to El Dorado County Short-Medium Transportation Finance 4 .30 Support renewal of Measure A Short 4 .31 Establish a regional role for Folsom, including a seat on the Short Sacramento Transportation Authority Board 4 .32 Continue cultivation of Regional, State and Federal relationships Short Parking Facilities and Policies 4 .33 Build a surface lot in the Historic District Short 4 .34 Build a parking structure separate from the Railroad Block Short 4 .35 Develop policies to ensure appropriate on-site parking for new Short-Medium development Source: City of Folsom Strategic Plan Update, February 22, 2003 City of Folsom Short-Range Transit Plan Update Final Report, September 2005 Appendix H, Page 278 City of Folsom Core Values, Goals and Appendix H Performance Measures TABLE A-13 Folsom Stage Line Goals, Objectives, Performance Measures, Standards and Monitoring Methods Goals and Objectives Performance Measures Standards Monitoring 1 . Provide a transit system that is effective in meeting the needs of the community. a . Provide convenient transit service. % of major activity centers 100% Annually as part of within 1/8 mile of routes SRTP update b . Provide reliable transit service . % scheduled departures 0-5 90% Quarterly field minutes late monitoring by Lead DAR pick-ups within 15 90% Worker minutes of quoted time Missed trips Zero Monthly operating Miles between roadcalls 10,000 reports b . Provide safe transit service . Miles between preventable 100,000 Monthly operating accidents reports c. Provide attractive services which Annual ridership growth Equal to population Annually as part of respond to market demands for growth SRTP update transportation. d . Proved coordinated transit services . % timed transfers with LRT 80% of connections Annually as part of during peak periods within 10 minutes SRTP update e . Provide accurate and timely Marketing materials accurate Yes Annually as part of marketing information I and widely distributed 1 I SRTP update 2. Operate and manage the transit system efficiently . a . Minimize operating costs per unit of Annual increase in cost per Annual increase Annually as part of service provided . vehicle revenue hour < 90% of CPI SRTP update b . Maximize vehicle life through % of preventive maintenance 100% Monthly operating preventive maintenance . inspections completed within reports 500 miles of target c. Maximize service productivity. Passengers per vehicle Fixed route - 12 revenue hour psgrs/hr within 2 years Monthly operating Dial-a-ride - 6 psgrs/hr reports d . Maximize cost recovery through % cost recovery through 20% systemwide Monthly operating farebox receipts. farebox receipts 10% Dial-a-ride reports 3. Provide accessible transit service. a . All vehicles equipped with working % vehicles equipped with 100% Annually as part of lifts. working lifts SRTP update b . Concentrations of elders and persons ' % of known concentrations ' 100% ' Annually as part of with disabilities served by transit. of seniors and persons with SRTP update disabilities served by transit c. Provide adequate capacity to meet Peak loading conditions not At all times on all Monthly operating demand . to exceed 150% of capacity services reports d . Work with community to identify areas ' Meetings with community ' Respond within 30 ' Annually as part of where new services are required. groups, employers in days to all service SRTP update response to comments from requests and resolve public in six months. Source: Table 4-1, Folsom Short-Range Transit Plan Final Report, August 1999 City of Folsom Short-Range Transit Plan Update Final Report, September 2005 Appendix H, Page 279 City of Folsom Core Values, Goals and Appendix H Performance Measures This Page Left Intentionally Blank City of Folsom Short-Range Transit Plan Update Final Report, September 2005 Appendix H, Page 280 Analysis of Unproductive Segments of Route 10 Appendix I Segments of Route 10 that would no longer have fixed-route bus service (if proposed Route A as shown in Figure 21 on page 69 is implemented : Central Folsom Riley Street (between Leidesdorff Street and Natoma Street) East Bidwell Street (between Riley Street and Wales Drive) Glenn Drive (between East Bidwell Street and Riley Street) Montrose Drive (between East Bidwell Street and Dean Way) Dean Way (between Montrose Drive and Coloma Street) Coloma Street (between Dean Way and East Bidwell Street) East Folsom (Lexington Hills Area) North Lexington Drive (between Oak Avenue Parkway) Prewett Drive (between North Lexington Drive and Silberhorn Drive) Silberhorn Drive (between Prewett Drive and Scholar Way) Scholar Way (between Silberhorn Drive and Cavitt Drive) Broadstone Parkway (between East Bidwell Street and Clarksville Road) North Folsom (American River Canyon Area) Folsom-Auburn Road (between Greenback Lane and Oak Avenue Parkway) Oak Avenue Parkway (between Folsom-Auburn Road and American River Canyon Drive) American River Canyon Drive (between Oak Avenue Parkway and Greenback Lane) Two stops in Central Folsom would have notable ndership impacts : one on East Bidwell Street near the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) service center and one on Coloma Street behind Sutter Middle School both have an estimated 13 daily boardings and alightings. The Lexington Hills area in east Folsom has an estimated 38 daily boardings and alightings. However, most of this passenger activity is on one trip in the morning and one trip in the afternoon by school kids . The segment with the least ridership impacts is the American River Parkway area which has an estimated 10 daily boardings and alightings. The realignment of Route 10 (proposed Route A) would operate on Riley Street between Wales Drive and Natoma Street with a recommended stop located on Riley Street near the intersection of East Bidwell Street. This stop is located within walking distance of both the DMV and Sutter Middle School . The proposed Route A also includes operating on Oak Avenue Parkway between North Lexington Drive and East Bidwell Street, with proposed stops on Oak Avenue Parkway between North Lexington Drive and South Lexington Drive, which is within walking distance of the Lexington Hills neighborhood . There will also be a stop at Folsom Lake Community College that is within walking distance of Silberhorn Drive . The proposed Route A also provides service to Folsom High School on Iron Point Road, so students residing in the Lexington Hills area would be able to take Route A to the high school without having to transfer between the current Route 10 and tripper route. Since proposed Route A would serve Folsom High School, the
Recommended publications
  • City of Elk Grove Public Transit Fares
    AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.2 CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: Consider 1) approving a proposal by MV Transportation for a new reverse commute service rate of $25/hour; and 2) authorizing staff to notice new fare rates and services for reverse commuting MEETING DATE: January 25, 2012 PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT HEAD: Richard Shepard, Public Works Director / City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff recommends the City Council consider: 1) Approving a proposal by MV Transportation for a new reverse commute service rate of $25/hour; and 2) Authorizing staff to notice new fare rates and services for reverse commuting. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On December 14, 2011, City Council heard an item discussing costs of implementing reverse commute services between Elk Grove and Downtown Sacramento in order to support the relocation of the California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS) Department. Consistent with existing contract requirements, it was estimated that the net cost of this service would be approximately $94,000 per year. This net cost was estimated assuming the following: 1 Elk Grove City Council January 25, 2012 Page 2 of 6 Estimated Cost of New Reverse Commute Service New service costs at the $190,000 contracted rate of $53.09/hour Less new revenue based on 100 new monthly permits at a reduced <$96,000> cost of $80/month Estimated net annual cost $94,000 Since a majority of the reverse commute service would come from using buses that are “dead-heading” (returning empty), Council requested that staff negotiate with MV Transportation, Inc. (MV) to reduce the contracted rate to a level that would make the service revenue neutral to the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridership Report (October 2019)
    Ridership Report (October 2019) Year to Date Summary Category FY20 YTD FY19YTD Difference % Change Trailing 12 Month Trend Bus 3,518,921 3,415,852 103,069 3.0% 11,500,000 Light Rail 3,848,176 3,641,112 207,064 5.7% Rail Bus System Total 7,367,097 7,056,964 310,133 4.4% 11,000,000 10,500,000 Current Month Summary 10,000,000 Category October 2019 October 2018 Difference % Change Bus 1,059,668 1,014,352 45,316 4.5% 9,500,000 Light Rail 1,063,740 1,025,613 38,127 3.7% System Total 2,123,408 2,039,965 83,443 4.1% 9,000,000 Daily Summary Category October 2019 October 2018 Difference % Change Bus (M-F) 41,415 40,275 1,140 2.8% Bus (Sat) 15,390 13,266 2,124 16.0% Bus (Sun) 10,371 7,915 2,456 31.0% October Ridership by Mode Light Rail (M-F) 40,939 40,510 429 1.1% 6% Light Rail (Sat) 17,127 13,500 3,627 26.9% Light Rail Light Rail (Sun) 12,229 9,500 2,729 28.7% Fixed Route 48% Other Services E-Tran Ridership Summary (E-Van included) 46% Category Current Year Prior Year Difference % Change E-Tran (YTD) 280,319 266,440 13,879 5.2% E-Tran (Monthly) 84,775 81,648 3,127 3.8% Other services include E-Tran, Folsom, SmaRT Ride, CBS and Special Services E-Tran (Weekday) 3,560 3,426 134 3.9% Route Level Ridership Comparison (Bus) Weelday Route Comparison Saturday Route Comparison Route Oct 2019 Oct 2018 Difference % Change Route Oct 2019 Oct 2018 Difference % Change 1 2,067 2,190 (124) -6% 1 768 777 (9) -1% 11 972 715 257 36% 11 447 282 165 59% 13 678 315 362 115% 13 426 - 426 15 795 1,215 (420) -35% 15 381 558 (176) -32% 19 423 658 (234) -36% 19 209 271
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom Short Range Transit Plan Update Project Appendix G.1 Public
    Folsom Short Range Transit Plan Update Project Appendix G .1 Public Comments Summary BUS SERVICE Commuter Feeder Service to Folsom Light Rail Stations Feeder bus essential for Folsom residents to take advantage of light rail; should run all day. Need fast, quick feeders to/from light rail during peak commuter hours only . Local feeder routes need to be within walking distance of residences, not just businesses. Draft bus service plan seems to cater to commercial traffic much more than commuters . Why can't the commuter public be covered during peak time (i.e ., 6 AM - 7 :30 PM & 4 PM - 5 :30 PM) and commercial traffic off-peak. Consider different routes for commuters (5am - 9 am, 3pm - 7pm) than for in-town customers (run all day). Commute routes should be designed to serve largest neighborhood populations possible and travel quickly to L.R. stations . Daytime in-town routes would serve major retail, city hall, college, etc. Early a.m. pick up (bus stop) at East Natoma & Briggs Ranch to light rail to get me to work by 6:30 a.m. Maintain service on Folsom-Auburn Road from Folsom Dam Road and provide feeder service to Historic Folsom light rail station. Add a peak-only loop up Folsom-Auburn, Oak Avenue Parkway, American River Canyon, Greenback, right on Folsom-Auburn, up unused center lane ramp to the Historic Folsom light rail station. Residents in Orangevale seemed to get better service even though they already have current RT service ; RT and Folsom could make arrangements so Folsom would no longer have to loop out to Madison/Main (e .g.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Minutes TCC Meeting 4-28-21
    TCC Agenda April 28, 2021 Transit Coordinating Committee April 28, 2021 – TCC 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Hosted via Zoom Members of the public wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at the beginning of the meeting. We ask that members of the public request to speak and keep their remarks brief. Testimony will be limited to a total of ten (10) minutes. Conference Call Option – SACOG Zoom Meeting 3 - Join Zoom Meeting via laptop, computer, or smartphone: https://zoom.us/j/96333495161 Meeting ID: 963 3349 5161. Join with one tap mobile +16699009128, 96333495161# US. Dial in with your phone +1 669 900 9128 US, +1 669 219 2599 US, +1 651 372 8299 US, 888 475 4499 US Toll-free, 877 853 5257 US Toll-free. Meeting ID: 963 3349 5161. Please do not put your phone on hold during the meeting; instead please hang up and call back when you’re free. Attendees: Glenda Marsh, public transit advocate/SMART Lisa Cappellari, Paratransit, Inc. James Drake, SacRT Jose Perez, YCTD Keith Martin, Yuba-Sutter Transit Mikki McDaniel, SCT/Link Jamie Wright, Placer County David Smith, Caltrans D3 Brett Bernegger, SacRT Mike Costa, e-tran Mike Dour, Roseville Transit Kristen Mazur, YCTD Erik Reitz, SacRT Matt Mauk, El Dorado County Transit Tiffani Fink, Paratransit, Inc. Will Garner, Placer County Transit Brian James, El Dorado County Transit Virginia Wieneke, ACC Rides Leah Barrett, 50 Corridor TMA Ed Scofield, Roseville Transit Allison Winter, Roseville Transit Sabrina Bradbury, SACOG Mike Rosson, SACOG Chris Dougherty, SACOG Caroline Payne, SACOG Nicholas Whitty, TransLoc Nirit Glazer, LookingBus Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • GOLD Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    GOLD light rail time schedule & line map GOLD Downtown - Folsom View In Website Mode The GOLD light rail line (Downtown - Folsom) has 6 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K Station (Nb): 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM (2) Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →Sacramento Valley Station (Wb): 5:00 AM - 9:30 PM (3) Sacramento Valley Station (Eb) →Historic Folsom Station (Eb): 3:49 AM - 10:19 PM (4) Sacramento Valley Station (Eb) →Sunrise Station (Eb): 4:04 AM - 10:49 PM (5) Sunrise Station (Wb) →8th & K Station (Nb): 5:58 PM - 6:58 PM (6) Sunrise Station (Wb) →Sacramento Valley Station (Wb): 4:58 AM - 5:28 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest GOLD light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next GOLD light rail arriving. Direction: Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K GOLD light rail Time Schedule Station (Nb) Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K Station (Nb) 25 stops Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 8:00 PM - 9:30 PM Monday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Historic Folsom Station (Wb) 300 Reading St, Folsom Tuesday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Glenn Station (Wb) Wednesday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Thursday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Iron Point Station (Wb) Friday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Hazel Station (Wb) Saturday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Sunrise Station (Wb) Cordova Town Center Station (Wb) GOLD light rail Info Zinfandel Station (Wb) Direction: Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K Mather Field/Mills Station (Wb) Station (Nb) Stops: 25 Trip Duration: 55 min Butterƒeld Station (Wb) Line Summary: Historic Folsom Station
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak/Folsom Light Rail Corridor Project Folsom Extension Station Fact Sheet
    Amtrak/Folsom Light Rail Corridor Project Folsom Extension Station Fact Sheet The Sacramento Regional Transit District’s 7.3-mile extension from Sunrise Boulevard to Historic Downtown Folsom was designed to improve public transit service within a 23-mile corridor following Highway 50 between the Amtrak Station in Downtown Sacramento and the city of Folsom. The $261 million Amtrak/Folsom Corridor Project consists of four areas of improvement including 10.7 miles of additional track, 10 stations, enhanced signaling and 14 new light rail vehicles. Completed in 2006, the Amtrak/Folsom Corridor Project added more than 6,000 daily passengers. Hazel Station 12500 Folsom Blvd., Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 Park-and-Ride: 432-space park-and-ride lot Points of Intrest: Nimbus Winery Mall, Garbeau’s Dinner Theater, shopping, dining Area: Retail, entertainment, residential, major employer Glenn Station Transit Oriented Development Opportunities: Com- 1025 Glenn Drive, Folsom, CA 95630 muter supportive: residential, retail, office Development Opportunities: Some vacant parcels; Park-and-Ride: 165-space park-and-ride lot housing, retail, and office Area: Retail, Residential Architect: Acanthus Studio, Inc. Bus Connection: Folsom Stage Line Artist: Sam Tubiolo, “Transitions” Architect: Acanthus Studio, Inc. Station Ammenties: 10 Bike rental lockers Artist: Charlotte Cooper, “Oak Leaf Fall” Iron Point Station Historic Folsom Station 150 Iron Point Road, Folsom, CA 95630 930 Leidesdorff Street, Folsom, CA 95630 Park-and-Ride: 216-space park-and-ride lot Park-and-Ride: 102 spaces in 3 park-and-ride lots Points of Intrest: Folsom Premium Outlets, Century Points of Interest: Lake Natoma, American River Bike Trail, Folsom 14 Theatre, Folsom Visitors Center, Lake Natoma, Folsom Railroad Museum, Folsom Powerhouse, Folsom Chamber of Commerce, shopping, dining, hotels shopping, dining, hotels Area: Retail, entertainment, residential Bus Connections: Folsom Stage Line Bus Connection: Folsom Stage Line Area: Retail, entertainment, residential, major employer Architect: Acanthus Studio, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Sacramento Regional Transit District 5-Year Capital Plan (FY 2008 – FY 2012) Table of Contents Section I: Introduction & Overview • Overview.............................................................................................................. I-1 • Process to Develop the 5-Year Capital Plan ............................................................ I-2 • Structure of the 5-Year Capital Plan........................................................................ I-3 • District Profile .........................................................................................................I-4 to I-5 • Funding Summary...........................................................................................................I-6 • Funding Sources .............................................................................................................I-7 • Guiding Documents ................................................................................I-8 to I-10 Section II: 5-Year Capital Plan Summary (FY 2008 – FY 2012) • 5-Year Plan Index...................................................................... Index-1 to Index-6 • 5-Year Plan Project Summaries .......................................................... II-1 to II-106 Tier I: Fund thru FY 2012: System Expansion: Light Rail: Northeast Corridor Enhancements (Phase 1) II-1 South Sacramento Phase 2 Light Rail Extension II-2 Downtown-Natomas-Airport Light Rail Extension II-4 Fleet Program: LR Vehicle Mid-Life Overhauls/Improvements: Siemens Light Rail Vehicle Mid-Life
    [Show full text]
  • Review the Draft Network Integration Plan Here
    Draft Network Integration Plan Network Integration Plan June 8, 2021 Executive Summary The 2018 California State Rail Plan articulates a vision of intercity rail, commuter rail, and local mass transit integration, making the rail system easier to access and use. To further this vision, the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) have been funding rail integration plans in various parts of the state to better integrate transit with the state rail system. The Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) Network Integration Plan is one of those plans. SacRT Network Integration Vision The common theme running through all state-sponsored Network Integration Plans is how to provide better connections between local transit and the state rail system. In Sacramento, that system consists of the Capitol Corridor and the San Joaquins intercity trains, which are sponsored by Caltrans and operated by their respective Joint Powers Authorities. In the future, two new San Joaquins roundtrips will be added on the Union Pacific Railroad’s Sacramento Subdivision, stopping at a Midtown Station along the 20th Street corridor. Additionally, the Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) commuter rail service, operating today between Stockton and San Jose, is planning an extension to Sacramento with multiple arrivals and departures. These trains also will stop at the Midtown Station. SacRT serves Sacramento Valley Station (SVS) today with the Gold Line light rail transit (LRT) service and two local bus routes, the 30 and the 38. The Gold Line operates with mostly 15-minute headways between SVS and Sunrise and 30-minute headways between Sunrise and Folsom.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary City of Folsom Short-Range Transit Plan Update This transit planning document has been prepared for the City of Folsom to meet State and Federal planning requirements, to provide a management tool and a policy guideline for on-going development of the City's transit system. Typically, short-range transit plans are updated about every five to seven years. The last short-range transit plan (SRTP) for the City of Folsom was prepared in 1999 for fiscal years 1999-2000 through FY2004/05 . This plan has been prepared to cover FY 2005/06 through FY 2009/10. The planning process for this SRTP update began about 12 months ago with an initial meeting of SACOG and Folsom Stage Line staff. Background research was conducted that included identifying the study area in terms of geography, community and demographic characteristics (Chapter 1). The existing Folsom transit services were analyzed and ridership trends were identified (Chapter 2). An analysis of transit demand based on the mobility needs of target population segments was performed (Chapter 3). An on-board passenger survey was conducted on Folsom Stage Line downtown commuter routes, Butterfield light rail connector route, local fixed route (Route 10) and Dial-A-Ride service (Chapter 3). Two on-line surveys were also conducted, one with Intel, the largest employer located in Folsom, and the other with Franchise Tax Board employees who live in Folsom and work at FTB located adjacent to the Butterfield light rail station in Sacramento . The survey results were helpful in the development of a restructured local fixed-route bus system to provide connections with the RT light rail system at the three new Folsom light rail stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridership Report (August 2019)
    Ridership Report (August 2019) Year to Date Summary Rolling 24 Month Trend Category FY20 YTD FY19YTD Difference % Change 12,000,000 Bus** 1,542,508 1,530,603 11,905 0.8% Rail Bus Light Rail 1,859,238 1,700,126 159,112 9.4% 11,500,000 System Total 3,401,746 3,230,729 171,017 5.3% 11,000,000 10,500,000 Current Month Summary 10,000,000 Category August 2019* August 2018 Difference % Change 9,500,000 Bus** 806,687 815,472 (8,785) -1.1% 9,000,000 Light Rail 946,115 927,742 18,373 2.0% Jul18 Jul19 Jan18 System Total 1,752,802 1,743,214 9,588 0.6% Jan19 Sep17 Sep18 Nov17 Nov18 Mar18 Mar19 May18 May19 *August 2019 had 1 less weekday than August 2018. Accounts for approximately 2.3% reduction in ridership Daily Summary August Ridership by Mode 2% Category August 2019 August 2018 Difference % Change Bus (M-F) 32,379 32,138 241 0.7% Light Rail Bus (Sat) 12,425 11,499 927 8.1% Fixed Route Bus (Sun) 7,578 7,404 174 2.4% 44% Other Services 54% Light Rail (M-F) 37,374 36,330 1,044 2.9% Light Rail (Sat) 15,940 13,300 2,640 19.8% Light Rail (Sun) 10,994 9,600 1,394 14.5% Etran services will be included in the summary next month. August ridership was flat. **Bus includes Fixed Route, CBS, SmaRT Ride, Folsom Fixed Route, Folsom DAR and other special services, Folsom ridership not complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridership Report (January 2020)
    Ridership Report (January 2020) FY20 Year to Date Summary Category FY20 YTD FY19 YTD Difference % Change Trailing 12 Month Trend Bus 6,172,715 5,812,472 360,242 6.2% 11,500,000 Light Rail 6,538,014 6,185,385 352,629 5.7% Rail Bus System Total 12,710,729 11,997,857 712,871 5.9% 11,000,000 10,500,000 Current Month Summary 10,000,000 Category January 2020 January 2019 Difference % Change Bus 909,004 813,453 95,551 11.7% 9,500,000 Light Rail 907,018 890,563 16,455 1.8% System Total 1,816,022 1,704,016 112,006 6.6% 9,000,000 Daily Summary Category January 2020 January 2019 Difference % Change Bus (M-F) 37,527 34,044 3,483 10.2% Bus (Sat) 14,597 11,369 3,228 28.4% Bus (Sun) 10,265 7,098 3,167 44.6% January Ridership by Mode Light Rail (M-F) 37,016 35,860 1,156 3.2% 6% Light Rail (Sat) 15,361 16,400 (1,039) -6.3% Light Rail Light Rail (Sun) 10,869 11,400 (531) -4.7% Fixed Route 49% Other Services 45% E-Tran Ridership Summary (E-Van included) Category Current Year Prior Year Difference % Change E-Tran (YTD) 466,820 439,796 27,024 6.1% Other services include E-Tran, Folsom, SmaRT Ride, CBS E-Tran (Monthly) 65,292 57,380 7,912 13.8% and Special Services E-Tran (Weekday) 2,996 2,613 383 14.7% Route Level Ridership Comparison (Bus) Weekday Route Comparison Saturday Route Comparison Route Jan 2020 Jan 2019 Difference % Change Route Jan 2020 Jan 2019 Difference % Change 1 1,651 1,562 89 6% 1 700 774 (74) -10% 11 929 589 340 58% 11 452 265 187 70% 13 716 240 476 199% 13 464 - 464 15 737 1,042 (305) -29% 15 410 494 (84) -17% 19 364 581 (217) -37% 19
    [Show full text]
  • American City Business Journals - Not for Commercial Use
    JANUARY 22, 2010 | SUPPLEMENT TO THE SACRAMENTO BUSINESS JOURNAL Years of Business © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use S PONSORED BY: PROVIDED BY US — DISTRIBUTED BY YOU. ® SHAREPOINT 2010 — • ASSESSMENTS • BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY ROADMAPS • DEPLOYMENTS • TECHNICAL EDUNARSSM • DESIGN & BRANDING • DASHBOARDS • DEVELOPMENT & INTEGRATION • SECURITY © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use IN COOPERATION WITH: WWW.KIEFERCONSULTING.COM 916.357.6767 © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use S-2 | 25 YEARS OF BUSINESS SACRAMENTO BUSINESS JOURNAL | JANUARY 22, 2010 25 events, people and companies Contents | from the past quarter-century S-4 Publisher’s foreword S-30 Galleria at Roseville S-6 Sacramento Kings S-32 Elk Grove S-8 Joe Serna Jr. S-34 Raley Field S-10 Air base closures S-36 The state budget S-12 Angelo Tsakopoulos S-38 Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger S-14 Tower Records S-40 Casinos S-16 Dan Crowley S-42 Housing on the march S-18 The Money Store S-44 Downtown hotels S-20 The Benvenuti family S-46 1984 S-22 Midtown S-47 Green biz S-24 Raley’s Inc. S-48 The McClatchy Co. S-26 Southwest Airlines S-50 Light rail S-28 Buzz Oates S-52 The Blueprint © American City Business Journals - Not for commercial use ■ 25 Years of Business is published by The Sacramento Business Journal. Copyright © 2010 by The Sacramento Business Journal, 1400 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95818 • 916-447-7661 • sacramento.bizjournals.com Publisher: Joanna Wessman • EDITORIAL: Editor: Ron Trujillo • Senior associate editor/
    [Show full text]