DOCSLIB.ORG

Propionic Acid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Short and long term storage of wet by-products fed to ruminants Szilvia Orosz Livestock Performance Ltd., Head of NIR Feed Laboratory Honorary associate professor, Szent István University, Hungary Dave Davies Silage Solutions Ltd, Wales, UK Honorary professor, Szent István University, Hungary Outline 1. Importance of wet by-products as feedstuffs, volume produced worldwide. 2. General description of diversity, industrial processes, nutritive value. 3. Short term storage – top vs. inner subsurface layer – treatments. 4. Long term storage – ensiling characteristics, – aerobic stability, – mixtures, – additives, – silo types. 5. Opportunities for research work in the future Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary ‚Distillery dairies’: Swill Milk Scandal in 1850s in New York The Swill Milk Scandal was a major adulterated food scandal in New York in the 1850s. Cows were fed swill which was residual mash from nearby distilleries. MESSAGE FOR THE XXI CENTURY: BENEFITS: • AVAILABLE FEED SOURCE IN HIGH VOLUME • ECONOMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT HAZARD: • ANIMAL HEALTH RISK • STORAGE CHALLENGES • FOOD SAFETY (eg. AFLATOXIN) Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Importance of wet by-products: SUPPLY approx. 1000 million ton/year for feeding Corn gluten meal and Pineapple by-products corn gluten feed 15 MT and leaves 8MT Main wet by product sources and Banana producers by-products 22 MT Wheat distillers 1. Sugar factory Corn distillers grain 40 grain 4MT MT • sugar beet pulp Wet brewers grain (USA, EU: GE, RU) 40 MT • sugar cane by-products Sugar beet pulp (Brazil, China, India) Sorghum • sorghum by-products by-products 62MT 247 MT (USA, Africa, Australia) Citrus 2. Fruit by-products: citrus pulp by-products (Brazil) 135 MT Sugar cane by-products 3. Brewers’ by-products: brewers’ 200 MT grain (Brazil, China, USA) 4. Distillers’ by-products: DDGS (corn: USA; wheat: EU) 5. Starch or ethanol prod.: CGF (USA, EU, Asia) Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Types of wet by-products from sugar industry Wet sugar beet pulp (247 million ton/year: for feed and biogas) • DM: 20-25% (perishable) Washing • Sugar: 5%DM (palatable) • dNDF:20-25 %DM (hemicellulose) for cattle Shreding • Heat–stress TMR ingredients in dry continental region: Slicing into V-shaped strips DMI and milk fat%. (2 mm wide) • Good fermentability: ’Sausage’ (successfull story) Passing into a rotating diffuser drum immersed in water at 72°C • 1993/94: more than 1 million tonnes of pressed sugar beet Screw-pressing (10-15% DM , pulp across Europe have been stored in plastic tube silos 2nd press: 20-25%DM) (Budissa Bag Technologies ) Dry Crude Crude Total NDF ADF lignin OMd ME matter protein fiber sugars MJ/kg % %DM % DM sugar beet pulp, fresh 24.1 8.6 21 49.3 24.8 1.8 5.1 83 11.2 sugar beet pulp, silage 23.9 9.5 21 50.0 25.2 1.6 82.4 11.0 Livestock5 Performance Ltd. Hungary Types of wet by-products from sugar industry Sugarcane by-products (200 million ton/year for feed) Field: sugarcane tops (DM:30%, CF:35%DM, ADL:6%DM, CP:5-7%DM) Process: • sugarcane bagasse (DM: 45%, CF: 45%DM , ADL: 12% DM , CP: 2%DM ) • ‚Factory’ bagasse: poor dig, fibrous forage • ‚Farm’ bagasse: higher sugar content, higher nutritive value • sugarcane mud Heuzé et al, 2014 Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Types of wet by-products derived from breweries wet brewers’ grains: barley, wheat, maize, rice and sorghum (high protein –seasonal product) wet wet brewers brewers grain, grain, fresh ensiled (barley) (barley) Dry matter % 24,9 25,6 Crude protein 25,9 29,2 Crude fiber 16,4 16 NDF 49,6 57,5 ADF %DM 20,8 21 Lignin 5,7 5 Starch* 5,7 - Total sugars 1 - OMd % 61,9 62,6 MJ/kg DM ME 10 10,2 Heuzé et al, 2015 N dig. ruminants % 76,5 78,3 Livestock7 Performance Ltd. Hungary Distillers’ by-products: ‚dry-milling’ Corn distilleries produce: • alcoholic beverages, • industrial ethanol • ethanol as biofuel (corn-based: USA) Dry-milling distillery -ethanol production (40 million ton/year) : • spent grains, wet grains, • wet distillers grain (WDG), • wet distillers grain with solubles (WDGS), • distillers wet grains with solubles (DWGS), • dried distillers grain (DDG), • condensed distillers solubles - syrup(CDS), • dried distillers solubles (DDS) (Heuzé et al, 2014) • dried distillers grain with solubles (DDGS: CP: 40% M, STARCH <8%DM, low lysine, UDP-source) Livestock8 Performance Ltd. Hungary By-products from starch or ethanol production : ‚wet-milling’ Wet-milling products: 1. maize starch, 2. maize germ oil meal, 3. maize steep liquor 4. corn gluten meal, 5. corn gluten feed (meal + CGF: 15 million ton/year) Corn gluten feed (WET OR DRIED) • maize bran + maize steep liquor +distillers solubles, +germ meal, +cracked maize screenings. • NUTRITIVE VALUE: •DM: 40% •starch: 24-28% DM •CP: 20-25% DM (70% dg.) • acidic (pH approx. 4.0-4.5), but perishable • mycotoxin hazard: aflatoxinB1, DON, T2 F2 (Heuzé et al, 2014 ) • corn gluten meal 65%CP corn gluten feed 20-25% CP Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Fruit wet by-products: citrus by-products The main producer of citrus fruit for processing is Brazil 2010: 47% of the world production, followed by the USA (29%). grapefruit: Citrus pulp lemon and 8,5 M lime: ton/year • solid residue that remains after fresh fruits are 15,2 M squeezed into juice. ton/year orange: • 50-70% of the fresh weight of the original fruit: 71,4 M mandarin: • peel (60-65%), ton/year 28,7 M • internal tissues (30-35%) (61%) ton/year • seeds (0-10%) • nutritive value: • DM: 20% • soluble fibre (pectins): 40% DM • high energy content and good digestibility in ruminant species • palatable to cattle WOLRDWIDE: • health risk: rumenparakeratosis, unbalanced Ca: P ratio 135 million TON/YEAR • stability and fermentation: • fresh: natural acidity, but still quite perishable • aerobically unstable – quick deterioration Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Short term storage: aerobic spoilage on the surface and subsurface processes of wet by-products Periodic delivery of fresh material from the factories to farms (20-40 ton/week): Achilles ’hill’ What is happening inside and outside? How can we protect? Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary FOOD SAFETY AND ANIMAL HEALTH RISK: MYCOTOXIN CONTAMINATION Toxigenic fungi: wet by-products are Fusarium/Aspergillus on particularly at risk maize 1. in the field the grain can be infected by molds and contaminated by mycotoxins before harvest (AFLA B1, DON, T2, F2) 2. during the industrial process Sugar beet pulp mycotoxin concentration will be increased in the by-product due to starch and protein extraction (mycotoxins in the bran), 3. on farm, during the short term storage in open-air (often non-covered) horizontal piles before feeding: aerobic spoilage (roquefortin) Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Short term storage: aerobic spoilage on the surface and subsurface processes of wet CGF (Hungary, 2007) Temperature control Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Temperature changes in wet CGF compared to the ambient temperature at depth of 10 cm - aerobic top layer (n=5) 50 C) ° 45 Ambient temp. 40 ControlWet CGF 35 Temperature ( Temperature 30 25 20 15 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Aerobic days of short term storage Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Short term storage: aerobic spoilage on the surface and subsurface processes of wet CGF (Hungary, 2007) The surface: visible spoilage after 14 aerobic days Untreated: TOP 10 cm Untreated: 50 cm Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Wet CGF temperature at depth of 10 cm and 50 cm on the 14th day of aerobic storage (ambient temperature: 22°C, n=5) ) C 60 ° ( 47.4a 50 pH: 5.5 vs. 4.1 40 Temperature 30 22.1d 20 Anaerobic 10 conditions? 0 10 cm 50 cm Different letters indicate significant difference, p< 0,05 Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Surface and subsurface processes in wet brewers’ grain under aerobic and anaerobic conditions after 10 days storage (n=5, 0.3% PA:FA 1:1, 0.5% PA:FA 1:1, buffered 0.5% PA:FA 1:1) 8 Aerobic mesophil bacteria 7 6,5a 6,5a Moulds 6 5,1a 4,9a 5,0b 5 log log 10 CFU g/kg 4,5b 4,1b 4,0b 4 2,7b 3,0b 3,0c 3,0c 3,0c 3 2 1 0,0c 0,0c 0,0c 0 Aerobic Anaerobic Aerobic Anaerobic Aerobic Anaerobic Aerobic Anaerobic Control 0,30% 0,50% 0,5% buff. Different letters show significant differences p< 0.05 Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Changes in wet brewers’ grain under aerobic and anaerobic conditions after 10 days storage (n=5, 0.3% PA:FA 1:1, 0.5% PA:FA 1:1, buffered 0.5% PA:FA 1:1) 20 18 Propionic acid g/kg DM 16 Ethanol in control WBG: Acetic acid 10,1c Lactic acid 14 aerobic: 0a g/kg DM anaerobic:1,84bg/kg DM 10,3c 12 5,9b 10 0,4a 4,2d 4,3d 8 2,7c 6 3,2c 2,6c 2,1c 2,3c 0,3a 6,7b 4 0,2a 1,4a 4,6c 5,3c 4,8c 4,8c 4,8c 2 0,8a 1,3a 1,6b 1,4a 0 Aerobic Anaerobic Aerobic Anaerobic Aerobic Anaerobic Aerobic Anaerobic Control 0,30% 0,50% 0,5% buff. Different letters show significant differences p< 0.05 Livestock Performance Ltd. Hungary Inhibitory effect of different treatments on deterioration of wet by-products during short term storage Additives: mould and enterobacteria inhibitors • propionic acid • propionic salts: the propionate solution at pH 4.86 was as effective as pure propionic acid (pH = 1.70), so does have considerable antimicrobial activity. • formic acid and its salts, • propionic acid/salt and formic acid/salt mixtures, • buffered acids by ammonia, • sodium benzoate • potassium sorbate Livestock Performance Ltd.
Recommended publications
  • Is Factory Farming Making Us Sick? IS FACTORY FARMING MAKING US SICK?

    Is Factory Farming Making Us Sick? IS FACTORY FARMING MAKING US SICK?

    Is Factory Farming making us sick? IS FACTORY FARMING MAKING US SICK? A Guide to Animal Diseases and their Impact on Human Health 1 Photo by Engin Akyurt Contents Introduction 4 Avian Influenza (Bird Flu) 6 Bovine TB 8 BSE 10 Campylobacter 12 E. Coli (O157: H7) 14 Foot and Mouth Disease 16 Johne’s Disease 18 Meningitis 20 MRSA 22 Nipah 24 Q Fever 25 Salmonella 26 Swine Flu 28 Other Zoonotic Diseases 30 We can change 32 References 34 2 Is Factory Farming making us sick? 3 Photo by Ethan Kent Introduction The majority of farmed animals in the UK In recent years, animal farming has are reared intensively, inside crowded, filthy brought us outbreaks of BSE, bovine sheds which are the perfect environment TB, foot and mouth, bird flu, swine flu, for bacteria and viruses to flourish. Stressed campylobacter, salmonella and many by their surroundings and their inability more devastating diseases. No wonder to display natural behaviours, forced to the United Nations Food and Agriculture live in their own excrement alongside sick Organization has warned that global and dying animals, it is not surprising that industrial meat production poses a serious farmed animals are vulnerable to infection. threat to human health3. Their immunity is further weakened by the industry breeding from just a few CREATING ANTIBIOTIC high-yielding strains, which has led to genetic erosion. This makes it easier for RESISTANCE disease to sweep swiftly through a group Instead of protecting of animals, who are likely to share near- ourselves by changing identical genetics with little immunological how we treat animals resistance.
  • 1589361321Unit V Food Adulteration.Pdf

    1589361321Unit V Food Adulteration.Pdf

    ~oodMicrobiology and the PFA Act, a trader is guilty if he sells milk to which water has been added Safety (intentional addition) or the cream of the milk has been replaced by cheap vegetable or animal fat (substitution) or simply the cream has been removed and the milk is sold as such, with a low fat content (abstraction). Unintentional contamination of the milk, due to carelessness on part of the trader is also considered as adulteration under the law. For instance, if the cans in which the trader is transporting or storing the milk, had been earlier treated with the chemicals like washing soda or boric acid or some detergent and not been washed thoroughly with water, residues of the chemicals may get mixed with the milk. Such milk would Ire considered adulterated. In addition, food is also considered to be adulterated, if it does not conform to the basic quality standards. For instance, the maximum amount of moisture allowed in a milk powder sample is 4%. If a sample is found to have greater moisture levels, it is considered to be adulterated. The malpractice of food adulteration is still widely prevalent in our country. There are very few studies on the extent and nature of food adulteration in the country. Whatever sFdies are available, are restricted to a select few cities and hence are not adequate to give a true picture for the country as a whole. The only data that are available are the reports from the food testing laboratories of the Central and State Government. According to these official reports, the extent of food adulteration in India bas been gradually diminishing from 3 1% in 1960s to less than 10% in the 1990s.
  • The Food and Drug Administration and the Economic Adulteration of Foods

    The Food and Drug Administration and the Economic Adulteration of Foods

    Indiana Law Journal Volume 41 | Issue 3 Article 2 Spring 1966 The oF od and Drug Administration and the Economic Adulteration of Foods Wesley E. Forte Member, Pennsylvania Bar Follow this and additional works at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Food and Drug Law Commons, and the Law and Economics Commons Recommended Citation Forte, Wesley E. (1966) "The oodF and Drug Administration and the Economic Adulteration of Foods," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 41 : Iss. 3 , Article 2. Available at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol41/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND THE ECONOMIC ADULTERATION OF FOODS WESLEY E. FORTEt PART I: THE HISTORY OF OUR ECONOMIC ADULTERATION LAW The economic adulteration of foods is an ancient cheat and scholars have found references to it in the laws of Moses and the early literature of China, Greece and Rome.1 The reported economic adulterations of foods increased unmistakably in the 1800's and early 1900's' and it was in this period of public indignation resulting from reports of milk diluted with water, coffee diluted with chicory and other roasted vegetable products, maple syrup diluted with cane sugar or glucose, and spices diluted with ground wheat and corn that Congress first passed prophylactic legislation preventing the debasement of foods.3 This legislation was part of the 1906 Food and Drugs Act.4 The provisions of the 1906 Act dealing with economic adulteration were t Member of the Pennsylvania Bar.
  • Bradish Johnson

    Bradish Johnson

    BRADISH JOHNSON 1811 – 1892 Stephen Whitney Lindsay 2008 2.0 BRADISH JOHNSON I recently researched a number of my ancestors, using the World Wide Web to wander through archived newspaper stories, genealogical sites, and old digitized books to learn their stories and unravel some mysteries. One branch of the family tree seemed unpromising — it contained names that were not part of the family lore, so I didn’t bother with it. At some point, when I thought that I had found about all I was going to find about my ancestors, I realized that this branch — my great grandmother’s maternal line — might be of interest, so I did a search using the name I had found for her grandfather: Bradish Johnson. Unusual names such as his work well in a web search, since most of the results will be relevant. With a common name like “James Johnson”, the millions of useless links that turn up can be overwhelming. The first thing that my Google search revealed was a beautiful photograph of a mansion in the Garden District of New Orleans — called the “Bradish Johnson House”. The next thing was a bed and breakfast south of New Orleans — an old plantation house that had belonged to Bradish Johnson. Then I found a reference for the Bradish Johnson Building, at Fifth Avenue and Twenty-first Street in Manhattan. Apparently, there was a story here. With a little online sleuthing, I was able to piece some of that story together. In 1795, two sea captains from Nova Scotia, Captain William M. Johnson and Captain George Bradish, purchased a large plot of land on the Mississippi Delta forty miles south of New Orleans.
  • Roskilde University

    Roskilde University

    Roskilde University Food and inclusion in educational reforms in Denmark Kristensen, Niels Heine Published in: Toward Sustainable Foodscapes and Landscapes Publication date: 2013 Document Version Early version, also known as pre-print Citation for published version (APA): Kristensen, N. H. (2013). Food and inclusion in educational reforms in Denmark. In Toward Sustainable Foodscapes and Landscapes: 2013 Annual Meeting (pp. 58-59) General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 2013 Annual Meeting Agriculture, Food and Human Values Society (AFHVS) Association for the Study of Food and Society (ASFS) June 19 – 22, 2013 Kellogg Hotel and Conference Center Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan Kellogg Hotel and Conference Center Floor Plan Lobby Level
  • Food Safety and the Law Food Safety Webinar Series 2014 First Nations Development Institute May 2014

    Food Safety and the Law Food Safety Webinar Series 2014 First Nations Development Institute May 2014

    Native Communities, Food Safety and the Law Food Safety Webinar Series 2014 First Nations Development Institute May 2014 Presented by: Janie Simms Hipp, J.D., LLM and A-dae Romero, J.D., LLM (anticipated 2014) Sections of Discussion • General Food Safety Legal Issues • Traditional Foods and Food Safety • Retail Food Safety • Food Donation and Food Safety • Additional Resources Food Safety Law Distinguished • There is a legally defined “food safety” body of law • At the international, federal, state and local levels • Quite comprehensive area of the law • But still developing • For Tribes, the idea of “food safety” also implies the protection of our “own” foods from misuse or exploitation outside of the Tribe or community • Legally speaking these issues fall under the body of law of Intellectual Property-Trademarks- Patents Recognition • Some Food is more than a physical item, some consider food a “relative” • Some Food has historical roots in and of the community • Tribes have highly developed processes and behavior regarding food that pre-date food safety law talked about here • Some Food is culturally significant • Some Food is vital to maintenance of community, culture, and physical health of people • Some Food is not always a choice • Talking about some food is intimate, but not so in the legal food safety context Before we begin… • There are two approaches: • Participate in the US legal schematic regarding food safety • Not participate in the US legal schematic regarding food safety • Both approaches have consequences for a Tribe
  • FOOD SAFETY and FOOD SECURITY Voeller V05-Ffirs.Tex V1 - 12/04/2013 4:34Pm Page Ii Voeller V05-Ffirs.Tex V1 - 12/04/2013 4:34Pm Page Iii

    FOOD SAFETY and FOOD SECURITY Voeller V05-Ffirs.Tex V1 - 12/04/2013 4:34Pm Page Ii Voeller V05-Ffirs.Tex V1 - 12/04/2013 4:34Pm Page Iii

    Voeller V05-ffirs.tex V1 - 12/04/2013 4:34pm Page ii Voeller V05-ffirs.tex V1 - 12/04/2013 4:34pm Page i FOOD SAFETY AND FOOD SECURITY Voeller V05-ffirs.tex V1 - 12/04/2013 4:34pm Page ii Voeller V05-ffirs.tex V1 - 12/04/2013 4:34pm Page iii FOOD SAFETY AND FOOD SECURITY Edited by JOHN G. VOELLER Black & Veatch Voeller V05-ffirs.tex V1 - 12/04/2013 4:34pm Page iv Copyright © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permission. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
  • Pesticides and Industrial Chemicals in Domestic and Imported Foods Completion Date

    Pesticides and Industrial Chemicals in Domestic and Imported Foods Completion Date

    FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION COMPLIANCE PROGRAM GUIDANCE PROGRAM 7304.004 MANUAL CHAPTER 04 – PESTICIDES AND CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION DATE June 27, 2011 PESTICIDES AND INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS IN DOMESTIC AND IMPORTED FOODS COMPLETION DATE Continuing DATA REPORTING PRODUCT CODES PRODUCT/ASSIGNMENT CODES REPORT SAMPLE COLLECTIONS/ANALYSIS UNDER THE FOLLOWING PACS: INDUSTRY CODES: 02-41; 45-47; 50; 52; 54 04004A Pesticides and Industrial Chemicals in Domestic and Imported Foods 04004D Dioxin and furans DO NOT report activities relating to Drug Residues in fish against these PACs. Separate assignments and reporting have been issued for these activities. Note: Material that is not releasable under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) has been redacted/deleted from this electronic version of the program. Deletions are marked as follows: (#) denotes one or more words were deleted; (&) denotes one or more paragraphs were deleted; and (%) denotes an entire attachment was deleted. FIELD HARD COPY REPORTS TO HEADQUARTERS A. End of Year Summary of Accomplishments Program information is still needed by headquarter units for planning and evaluation of the pesticides. Each district/region is requested to submit a summary report covering their prior year’s pesticide plan. This summary will be due October 31 after the conclusion of the fiscal year. Submit the summary to Program Monitor, Shannon Ingram, HFS-615. The Summary Report should cover the following types of information: 1. A summary of the import and domestic district/regional plan accomplishments including: results of district initiated surveys; a summary of actionable samples; significant State and DATE OF ISSUANCE: 6/27/11 PAGE 1 FORM FDA 2438 (7/92) PROGRAM 7304.004 State/District joint activities and accomplishments; and other program-related highlights or special issues encountered during the year; 2.
  • AFHVS) Association for the Study of Food and Society (ASFS)

    AFHVS) Association for the Study of Food and Society (ASFS)

    Roskilde University Green Learning in the ‘New Nordic School’ Danish perspectives on a national strategy for garden education Nielsen, Morten Kromann; Kristensen, Niels Heine Published in: Toward Sustainable Foodscapes and Landscapes Publication date: 2013 Document Version Early version, also known as pre-print Citation for published version (APA): Nielsen, M. K., & Kristensen, N. H. (2013). Green Learning in the ‘New Nordic School’: Danish perspectives on a national strategy for garden education. In Toward Sustainable Foodscapes and Landscapes: 2013 Annual Meeting (pp. 74-75) General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 10. Oct. 2021 2013 Annual Meeting Agriculture, Food and Human Values Society (AFHVS) Association for the Study of Food and Society (ASFS) June 19 – 22,
  • Adulterated Food Sec. 402

    Adulterated Food Sec. 402

    ADULTERATED FOOD SEC. 402. [21 U.S.C. 342] A food shall be deemed to be adulterated— 1 (a)(1) If it bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health; but in case the substance is not an added substance such food shall not be considered adulterated under this clause if the quantity of such substance in such food does not ordinarily render it injurious to health; 2 (2)(A) 3 if it bears or contains any added poisonous or added deleterious substance (other than a substance that is a pesticide chemical residue in or on a raw agricultural commodity or processed food, a food additive, a color additive, or a new animal drug) that is unsafe within the meaning of section 406; or (B) if it bears or contains a pesticide chemical residue that is unsafe within the meaning of section 408(a); or (C) if it is or if it bears or contains (i) any food additive that is unsafe within the meaning of section 409; or (ii) a new animal drug (or conversion product thereof) that is unsafe within the meaning of section 512; or (3) if it consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance, or if it is otherwise unfit for food; or (4) if it has been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health; or (5) if it is, in whole or in part, the product of a diseased animal or of an animal which has died otherwise than by slaughter; or (6) if its container is composed, in whole or in part, of any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render the contents injurious to health; or (7) if it has been intentionally subjected to radiation, unless the use of the radiation was in conformity with a regulation or exemption in effect pursuant to section 409.
  • Protein Ligation and Total Synthesis II 1St Edition Free

    Protein Ligation and Total Synthesis II 1St Edition Free

    FREE PROTEIN LIGATION AND TOTAL SYNTHESIS II 1ST EDITION PDF Lei Liu | 9783319369372 | | | | | Food chemistry - Wikipedia Food chemistry is the study of chemical processes and interactions of all biological and non-biological components of foods. It is similar to biochemistry in its main components such as carbohydrateslipidsand proteinbut it also includes areas such as water, vitaminsmineralsenzymesfood additivesflavorsand colors. This discipline also encompasses how products change under certain food processing techniques and ways either to enhance or to prevent them from happening. An example of enhancing a process would be to encourage fermentation of dairy products with microorganisms that convert lactose to lactic acid ; an example of preventing a process would be stopping the browning on the surface of freshly cut apples using lemon juice or other acidulated water. The scientific approach to food and nutrition arose with attention to agricultural chemistry in the works of J. WalleriusHumphry Davyand others. For example, Davy published Elements of Agricultural Chemistry, in a Course of Lectures for the Board of Agriculture in the United Kingdom which would serve as a foundation for the profession worldwide, going into a fifth edition. Earlier work included that by Carl Wilhelm Scheele who isolated malic acid from apples in Some of the findings of Liebig on food chemistry were translated and published by Eben Horsford in Lowell Massachusetts in In the Society of Public Analysts was formed, with the aim of applying analytical methods to the benefit of Protein Ligation and Total Synthesis II 1st edition public. It was also out of concern for the quality of the food supply, mainly food adulteration and contamination issues that would first stem from intentional contamination to later with chemical food additives by the s.
  • FDA Regulations for Poisonous Or Deleterious Substances Before These Raw Materials Or Other Ingredients Are Incorporated Into Finished Food

    FDA Regulations for Poisonous Or Deleterious Substances Before These Raw Materials Or Other Ingredients Are Incorporated Into Finished Food

    What You Need to Know About the FDA Regulation: Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food (21 CFR Part 117): Guidance for Industry Small Entity Compliance Guide Additional copies are available from: Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration 5001 Campus Drive College Park, MD 20740 (Tel) 240-402-1700 http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/ucm253380.htm or http://www.regulations.gov You may submit either electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the Docket No: FDA-2011-N-0920 listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition October 2016 1 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 4 II. WHO MUST COMPLY WITH THE RULE? ........................................................................... 6 III. KEY TERMS USED IN PART 117 ......................................................................................... 6 IV. WHO IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARD ANALYSIS AND