DOCSLIB.ORG

Seneca's Natural Questions. Platonism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seneca's Natural Questions. Platonism Durham E-Theses Seneca's Natural Questions: Platonism, Physics, and Stoic Therapy in the First Century AD BENISTON, RICHARD,JOHN How to cite: BENISTON, RICHARD,JOHN (2017) Seneca's Natural Questions: Platonism, Physics, and Stoic Therapy in the First Century AD , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12361/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 – Abstract – Seneca’s Natural Questions: Platonism, Physics, and Stoic Therapy in the First Century AD Richard Beniston The combination of ethics and physics in Seneca’s Natural Questions has frequently puzzled scholars. Although a number of studies have attempted to reconcile the work’s ethical and physical parts, others maintain that there is no substantial connection between them. Both positions are problematic. The former glosses over the quite obvious ways in which these vivid accounts of vice are thematically at odds with the physics; the latter results in a bifurcation of the aims of the work. This study argues that the incongruous character of these passages plays an integral part in the work’s overall goal: to defend the Stoic account of the ‘the good’. This account was under attack from Platonist rivals. The Stoics argue that the good is grounded ultimately in the wellbeing of the cosmos as a whole; Platonists maintain that conceptualising the good as such is impossible because, as empiricists, the Stoics can only account for a subjective understanding of the good, grounded first and foremost in the wellbeing of the body. Seneca’s engagement with this debate is indicated by the frequent allusions to Plato in the work, particularly the idea of ‘separating soul from body’. Seneca suggests that a carefully structured study of nature can achieve this ‘separation’. This process helps agents to overcome the subjective, body-focussed perspective that the Platonists associate with empiricism. Seneca thus demonstrates a therapeutic means through which an empiricist agent could come to conceive of the good as the Stoics envisage it. This same process of separation from one’s body, however, also provides an ideal opportunity to reflect critically on the objects that we tend to misidentify as goods. It is here that the moralising passages prove useful. These arresting accounts of vice serve to jar us into critical reflection on where we ground our understanding of the good. 1 Seneca’s Natural Questions: Platonism, Physics and Stoic Therapy in the First Century AD Richard Beniston Ustinov College A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics and Ancient History Durham University 2017 2 Table of Contents Introduction 7 Seneca’s Natural Questions: the rehabilitation of a neglected work 7 The Natural Questions: a work of philosophy 10 The Natural Questions and post-Hellenistic Stoicism 13 – Post-Hellenistic Stoicism: not just practical ethics 14 – Seneca, Platonism, and ‘eclecticism’ 21 Summary: a dialectical reading of the Natural Questions 25 Chapter 1 – The Unusual From of the Natural Questions: Interpretive Approaches 28 Introduction: The unusual form of the Natural Questions 28 The Stoic tradition of physical writing 34 Literary convention 39 Philosophical approaches 42 –The Stoic framework 42 –The Platonist framework 43 –A Stoic-Platonist dialectical framework? 47 Chapter 2 – The Dialectical Context: A Debate about Grounding the Good 50 Introduction: Platonism and the ‘crisis’ of materialism 50 Empiricism and ‘the good’ 53 Seneca and the problem of the good 65 Separating soul from body 69 Chapter 3 – Separating Soul from Body: The Aetiology of the Natural Questions 73 Introduction 73 The structure of the aetiology: the example of book 3 74 From seen to unseen: Seneca’s ‘Platonising’ methodology 80 Seneca’s response to the Platonists 80 Appendix: The structure of the aetiology in the individual books of the Natural 97 Questions Chapter 4 – Re-evaluating False Goods: The Moralising Passages of the Natural Questions 115 Introduction 115 Characterising the moralising passages 116 – Differentiating the moralising passages 116 –Thematic and rhetorical discontinuity 119 –‘False goods’ and the portrait of empiricism in the moralising passages 122 –The positioning of the moralising passages in the work 128 The therapeutic role of the moralising passages 132 ‘Paradoxical’ natural phenomena 136 Conclusion 139 Chapter 5 – Studying Physics in the Hellenistic Stoa 141 Introduction 141 Stoic physics and Stoic ethics: the modern debate 142 3 Why study physics...at all? 146 Physics as therapy 154 Physics and ethics in the Natural Questions (revisited) 159 Summary and Conclusion 165 Summary 165 Seneca’s innovative conservatism 167 Bibliography 173 4 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without the author's prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. 5 Acknowledgements Thanks go first and foremost to George Boys-Stones, whose advice and guidance throughout my extended time at Durham has been outstanding. Without his patient encouragement and support, this thesis could not have been written. It has been an honour to work with him. Thanks also to my second supervisor, Phillip Horky, for his comments on portions of this thesis, and for his unfailing willingness to take an interest in my work. I am deeply indebted to all who attended meetings of the Ancient Philosophy Reading Group. These vibrant weekly gatherings of Durham’s Ancient Philosophy community have brought the subject to life, and have been an invaluable source of discussion with like-minded colleagues. I shall miss them (and their subsequent pub trips) a great deal. A big thank you to Nicki Slater, who kindly offered to proof-read this thesis, and whose diligence and attention to detail in this task went above and beyond the call of duty. A debt of gratitude is also owed to all those who have allowed me to present my work over the past few years – the IDEA Centre in Leeds, the School of History, Classics and Archaeology in Edinburgh, not to mention the Department of Classics and Ancient History in Durham. Both the opportunity to speak, and the comments of those who attended, have been extremely useful and very much appreciated. I am sincerely grateful to the Art and Humanities Research Council for funding my time at Durham, without which this project would not have been possible. Special thanks, finally, to my family, my friends and, most of all, to Verity, whose patience, love, and support throughout the doctorate have been nothing short of miraculous. 6 – Introduction – 1. Seneca’s Natural Questions: the rehabilitation of a neglected work Seneca’s Natural Questions “has never been widely read or admired”, or so it has frequently been said.1 In fact, though, the text did not always suffer from such disregard. From the Middle Ages through even into the 19th century it enjoyed considerable standing as a scientific work, even if consistently outshone by the work of Aristotle and Pliny.2 It was really only the late 19th and early 20th centuries that saw the work fall into serious disrepute. Scholarship continued, to be sure, but mainly from the point of view of Quellenforschung,3 or else focussing on the knotty question of the work’s original book order (an issue which, more recently, may finally have been resolved).4 Little attempt was made to understand the work in its own right. Few, indeed, seem to have thought it worth bothering: the work was widely seen to be lacking a coherent sense of structure or purpose, philosophical understanding, and even seriousness of intent.5 In recent decades, though, there has been something of a renaissance of interest in the Natural Questions, with scholars returning to the text with a much more sympathetic eye. This trend began with a thesis (1960) and subsequent article (1964) by Stahl, followed by a monograph by Waiblinger (1977), and then a commentary on book 2 by Hine (1981). At the end of the 1980s there arrived another monograph, by Gross (1989), along with a lengthy and 1 Morford (2002), 9. 2 See Waiblinger (1977, 1-3) for a useful history of the early reception of the Natural Questions. 3 For a long time it was believed that Seneca drew on just one source for the Natural Questions, frequent candidates being Posidonius, Asclepiodotus, or Papirius Fabianus. Today, most scholars accept that Seneca drew on a variety of sources. See especially Hall (1977); Setaioli (1988) 375-452; Gross (1989), passim. 4 Two main book orderings have come down to us in the manuscripts, with the so-called Quantum order (so named because of the first word in the manuscript) running 1 – 2 – 3 – 4a – 4b – 5 – 6 – 7, and the other (the so- called Grandinem ordering) as 4b – 5 – 6 – 7 – 1 – 2 – 3 – 4a. Both orderings, however, result in internal inconsistencies (for discussion of which, see Hine (1981), 4-19). Beginning in the early 19th century, therefore, numerous attempts have been made to reorder the text coherently – as many as eleven, according to one count (Grecke (1895), 110).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Total Work of Art in European Modernism Series Editor: Peter Uwe Hohendahl, Cornell University
    The Total Work of Art in European Modernism Series editor: Peter Uwe Hohendahl, Cornell University Signale: Modern German Letters, Cultures, and Thought publishes new English- language books in literary studies, criticism, cultural studies, and intellectual history pertaining to the German-speaking world, as well as translations of im- portant German-language works. Signale construes “modern” in the broadest terms: the series covers topics ranging from the early modern period to the present. Signale books are published under a joint imprint of Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library in electronic and print formats. Please see http://signale.cornell.edu/. The Total Work of Art in European Modernism David Roberts A Signale Book Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library Ithaca, New York Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library gratefully acknowledge the support of The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation for the publication of this volume. Copyright © 2011 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writ- ing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2011 by Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roberts, David, 1937– The total work of art in European modernism / David Roberts. p. cm. — (Signale : modern German letters, cultures, and thought) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5023-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Modernism (Aesthetics) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Pater's Aesthetic Historicism
    Transfigured World · CAROLYN WILLIAMS · Transfigured World · WALTER PATER'S AESTHETIC HISTORICISM · Cornell University Press ITHACA AND LONDON Copyright © 1989 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850, or visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. First published 1989 by Cornell University Press. First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2016. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Williams, Carolyn, 1950– Transfigured world: Walter Pater’s aesthetic historicism / Carolyn Williams p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-8014-2151-8 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-5017-0724-7 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Pater, Walter, 1839–1894—Aesthetics. 2. Pater, Walter, 1839–1894— Knowledge—History. 3. Historicism. I. Title. PR5138.A35W5 1989 824'.8—dc20 89-42883 The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ For Cecil Lang Contents Acknowledgments ix Abbreviations xi Introduction I Part One • Opening Conclusions II I. "That Which Is Without" 14 2. "The Inward World of Thought and Feeling" 18 3. Aestheticism 26 4. Answerable Style 37 5. Iiistoricism 46 6. Aesthetic Iiistoricism and "Aesthetic Poetry" 57 7. The Poetics of Revival 68 Part Two • Figural Strategies in Th e Renaissance 79 I. Legend and Iiistoricity 82 2. Myths of Iiistory: Th e Last Supper 94 3. The Iiistoricity of Myth 103 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 166 BOOK REVIEWS Gretchen Reydams-Schils, the Roman Stoics
    166 BOOK REVIEWS Gretchen Reydams-Schils, The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility and Affection. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2005. xii + 210 pp. ISBN 0-226-30837-5. In the third book of the Histones Tacitus presents us with the ludicrous picture of a Stoic philosopher mingling with the soldiers of the Flavian army as it prepares to invade the city, and preaching unheeded the blessings of peace and the dangers of war (3.81). The purveyor of this intempestiva sapientia was Musonius Rufus, an eques Romanus, a friend of many Roman senators, a political exile, and the hero of this book. The author sets out to prove that the Roman Stoics adapted originally Greek Stoic doctrine to emphasize the importance of social responsibility and social engagement to the life of virtue. Stoicism, for all its emphasis on self-sufficiency, independence of outer circumstances, and spiritual self-improvement, saw the instinct for sociability as implanted by divine providence in human beings, who were imbedded in a society of rational beings comprising men and gods. What the author thinks was the distinctive contribution of the Roman Stoics was to retrieve for the life of virtue the traditional relationships of parenthood and marriage that Plato and the Cynics had tried to denigrate. It is therefore not the Musonius Rufus of Roman politics that interests her, but the advocate of marriage as a union of body and soul between equals and the opponent of infanticide and child exposure. The structure of the book reflects this emphasis, for it ‘reverses the Stoic progression from self to god and universe’ (5).
    [Show full text]
  • The Stoics and the Practical: a Roman Reply to Aristotle
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2013 The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle Robin Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Robin, "The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle" (2013). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 143. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/143 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STOICS AND THE PRACTICAL: A ROMAN REPLY TO ARISTOTLE A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2013 BY Robin Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, IL - TABLE OF CONTENTS - Introduction……………………..............................................................................................................p.i Chapter One: Practical Knowledge and its Others Technê and Natural Philosophy…………………………….....……..……………………………….....p. 1 Virtue and technical expertise conflated – subsequently distinguished in Plato – ethical knowledge contrasted with that of nature in
    [Show full text]
  • The Stoic Invention of Cosmopolitan Politics1
    For the Proceedings of the Conference "Cosmopolitan Politics: On The History and Future of a Controversial Ideal" Frankfurt am Main, December 2006 THE STOIC INVENTION OF COSMOPOLITAN POLITICS1 Eric Brown Department of Philosophy Washington University in St. Louis According to ancient Stoics, a polis is a place, a system of human beings, or both of these things,2 and it is a system of human beings—not just a loose collection—because it is put in order by law.3 But Stoics do not mean by 'law' the decree of a duly constituted authority. They define 'law' as "right reason," which provides "the standard of right wrong, prescribing to naturally political animals the things that ought to be done and proscribing the things that ought not."4 In point of fact, they think that no extant 1 This essay is only a lightly revised version of the programmatic lecture I delivered at the conference. Its first two thirds, which sketch an account of the Chrysippean Stoic's attachment to a cosmopolitan way of life, receive fuller development and defense in Brown (forthcoming), and the last third is more provocation than settled argument. I hope that the many people who have helped me will not be offended if I single out for special thanks Elizabeth Asmis, Pauline Kleingeld, and Martha Nussbaum; their criticisms and encouragement over many years have been invaluable to me. I also thank the organizers and the other conferees in Frankfurt for an excellent experience, and the editors of the proceedings for their patience. 2 Stobaeus II 7.11i 103,17-20 Wachsmuth.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Neo-Nazism in the Usa, United Kingdom and Australia
    TRANSNATIONAL NEO-NAZISM IN THE USA, UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA PAUL JACKSON February 2020 JACKSON | PROGRAM ON EXTREMISM About the Program on About the Author Extremism Dr Paul Jackson is a historian of twentieth century and contemporary history, and his main teaching The Program on Extremism at George and research interests focus on understanding the Washington University provides impact of radical and extreme ideologies on wider analysis on issues related to violent and societies. Dr. Jackson’s research currently focuses non-violent extremism. The Program on the dynamics of neo-Nazi, and other, extreme spearheads innovative and thoughtful right ideologies, in Britain and Europe in the post- academic inquiry, producing empirical war period. He is also interested in researching the work that strengthens extremism longer history of radical ideologies and cultures in research as a distinct field of study. The Britain too, especially those linked in some way to Program aims to develop pragmatic the extreme right. policy solutions that resonate with Dr. Jackson’s teaching engages with wider themes policymakers, civic leaders, and the related to the history of fascism, genocide, general public. totalitarian politics and revolutionary ideologies. Dr. Jackson teaches modules on the Holocaust, as well as the history of Communism and fascism. Dr. Jackson regularly writes for the magazine Searchlight on issues related to contemporary extreme right politics. He is a co-editor of the Wiley- Blackwell journal Religion Compass: Modern Ideologies and Faith. Dr. Jackson is also the Editor of the Bloomsbury book series A Modern History of Politics and Violence. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author, and not necessarily those of the Program on Extremism or the George Washington University.
    [Show full text]
  • After Life in Roman Paganism
    With the Compliments of YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY NEW HAVEN, CONN., U.S.A. AFTER LIFE IN ROMAN PAGANISM YALE UNIVERSITY MRS. HEPSA ELY SILLIMAN MEMORIAL LECTURES SILLIMAN MEMORIAL LECTURES PUBLISHED BY YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS ELECTEICITY AND MATTEE. By JOSEPH JOHN THOMSON, D.Sc., LL.D., PH.D., F.E.S., Fellow of Trinity College and Cavendish Professor of Ex perimental Physics, Cambridge University. (Fourth printing.) THE INTEGEATIVE ACTION OF THE NEEVOUS SYSTEM. By CHARLES S. SHERRINGTON, D.Sc., M.D., HON. LL.D. TOR., F.E.S., Holt Professor of Physiology, University of Liverpool. (Sixth printing.) EADIOACTIVE TEANSFOEMATIONS. By ERNEST RUTHERFORD, D.Sc., LL.D., F.E.S., Macdonald Professor of Physics, McGill University. (Second printing.) EXPEEIMENTAL AND THEOEETICAL APPLICATIONS OF THEE- MODYNAMICS TO CHEMISTEY. By DR. WALTER NERNST, Professor and Director of the Institute of Physical Chemistry in the University of Berlin. PEOBLEMS OF GENETICS. By WILLIAM BATESON, M.A., F.E.S., Director of the John Innes Horticultural Institution, Merton Park, Surrey, Eng land. (Second printing.) STELLAE MOTIONS. With Special Eeference to Motions Determined by Means of the Spectrograph. By WILLIAM WALLACE CAMPBELL, Sc.D., LL.D., Director of the Lick Observatory, University of California. (Second printing.} THEOEIES OF SOLUTIONS. By SVANTE ARRHENIUS, PH.D., Sc.D., M.D., Director of the Physico-Chemical Department of the Nobel Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. (Third printing.) IEEITABILITY. A Physiological Analysis of the General Effect of Stimuli in Living Substances. By MAX VERWORN, M.D., PH.D., Professor at Bonn Physiological Institute. (Second printing.) PEOBLEMS OF AMEEICAN GEOLOGY. By WILLIAM NORTH RICE, FRANK D.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Happiness Regents Professor Julia Annas
    Philosophy 220: Philosophy of Happiness Regents Professor Julia Annas. MWF 1 – 1.50 pm. Chavez 301. The course has a D2L website, where all the readings are to be found. My office is Social Science Building 123. Office hours TBA. The Philosophy Department office is Social Sciences Building 213. Why happiness? Happiness matters!. There are large numbers of self-help books telling us how to be happy. Some nations are planning to measure the happiness of their citizens to find out how it can be increased. There is a huge field of ‘happiness studies’, and focus on happiness in positive psychology as well as politics and law. Much of this is confusing, since it’s often not clear what the authors think happiness is. Is it feeling good? Is it having a positive attitude to the way you are now? Is it having a positive attitude to your life as a whole? Is it having a happy life? How can some people advise others on how to be happy? Philosophers have explored happiness, and our search for happiness, for two thousand years. They have asked what happiness is, and have developed different answers, including some now being rediscovered. In this course we will ask what happiness is, and look at major answers. We’ll look at rich philosophical traditions of thinking about happiness, and also at some recent work in the social sciences. We’ll examine the contributions being made to the ongoing search to find out what happiness is, and how we can live happy lives. Course Readings Course readings will be available on the D2L site.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin 019 Roman Imperial Literature: Death in Seneca Prof
    Latin 019 Roman Imperial Literature: Death in Seneca Prof. Jeremy B. Lefkowitz Spring 2011 [email protected] MWF 10:30 ‐ 11:20 Trotter 111, x7894 Trotter 115 Office Hours: Wednesday 1:00 – 4:00 & by appointment Course Description This course examines Seneca's views on life and death as expressed in his philosophical essays, letters to his friends and family, and tragic plays. The emphasis will be on close readings of Seneca's prose and poetry in Latin, with careful attention to the distinguishing features of Seneca’s rhetorical style, his famous brevitas and theatricality, and the place of Senecan thought in its literary, philosophical, and historical contexts. Evaluation Participation and preparation for class (including presentations): 15% Regular (unannounced) quizzes on vocabulary and morphology: 20% Term Paper (first draft due Friday, April 14; final draft due Friday, April 29): 15% Midterm Exam (Wednesday, February 23): 25% Final Exam (date tba): 25% Guidelines and Expectations Preparing for Class: It is essential that you come to every class meeting well prepared. What does it mean to be "well prepared" for this class? It means reading every line of assigned Latin closely and carefully. Here is a checklist to help you do this: * Have you read through everything out loud, slowly, with attention to pronunciation and accentuation? * Have you worked through the texts, sentence by sentence, doing your best to understand what you are reading? * Have you looked up any unfamiliar words in the dictionary, making a list (or an index card) of every word you look up? * Have you checked all forms and rules of syntax about which you are unsure in your Latin grammar? * Have you read through the texts again, one last time, to make sure you are confident in your understanding of all the Latin expressions? Of course, there will be times when you cannot fully understand the meaning of a sentence or phrase on your own, in which case you should come to class with questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero on Epicurean Friendship: a Reappraisal 109
    Cicero on Epicurean Friendship: A Reappraisal 109 POLITEIA VOL. 1, No 2, SPRING 2019 APPENDIX CICERO ON EPICUREAN FRIENDSHIP: A REAPPRAISAL Phillip Mitsis New York University Given the occasion, I thought I might take the opportunity to revisit my first pub- lished paper on Epicureanism1 originally begun in a Lucretius seminar at Cornell in 1978 taught by Elizabeth Asmis. The paper's argument now seems to me in retrospect to exhibit a certain naive confidence in Cicero's reliability as a source, and though I still stand by some of its overall conclusions about Epicurean friendship, my views about the nature of the path that one needs to take to get to those conclusions has changed considerably.2 Readers will best judge whether a forty-year gap in looking at these arguments, apart from merely complicating matters, has led to any progress. At De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum 1.65-70, Cicero, through the character of Tor- quatus, offers our most detailed and seemingly systematic surviving account of Epi- curean views of friendship. Brad Inwood has forcefully reminded us, however, that this work has a particular focus and that its overall structure and arguments clearly reflect it.3 Cicero is examining what the fines (limits, ends, criteria, etc.) of goods and of evils are in various rival philosophical theories and in the first two books he sets himself the project of presenting and criticizing the Epicurean claim that pleasure serves as a final end or goal of our actions. One recurring problem in his account is that he glosses the notion of finis with terms having different valences and, thus, those wishing to extract from Cicero's discussion Epicurus' original view of friendship are faced with the problem that he often describes the relation of friendship to pleasure in terminology imprecise enough to encompass different theoretical outlooks.
    [Show full text]
  • De Otio De Brevitate Vitae
    SENECA DE OTIO DE BREVITATE VITAE G. D. WILLIAMS Associate Professor of Classics, Columbia University, New York The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge , United Kingdom The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge, ,UK West th Street, New York, -, USA Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, , Australia Ruiz de Alarc´on , Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town , South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typefaces Baskerville / pt and New Hellenic System LATEX ε [] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library hardback paperback CONTENTS Preface page vii Conventions and abbreviations viii Introduction Author and date: initial problems The Dialogues in context (a) The Stoicbackground (b) The Roman philosophical tradition (c) From Republicto Empire De otio (a) The view from above (b) Date, addressee and related problems De breuitate uitae (a) Preliminaries (b) Date and addressee (c) Theme and interpretation Style and language (a) Senecan style: context and general tendency (b) Senecan mannerism, vocabulary, wordplay The transmission of the text L. ANNAEI SENECAE DE OTIO; DE BREVITATE VITAE Commentary Bibliography Indexes General Latin words Greek words v INTRODUCTION . AUTHOR AND DATE: INITIAL PROBLEMS Born into a provincial equestrian family of Italian extraction at Corduba (modern C´ordoba) in southern Spain, Lucius Annaeus Seneca (c. – ) wasraisedand educated from an early age at Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering Romanity in Seneca's De Otio and De Brevitate Vitae Joshua Dean Wimmer [email protected]
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 1-1-2012 Lend Me Your Voice: Discovering Romanity in Seneca's De otio and De brevitate vitae Joshua Dean Wimmer [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Wimmer, Joshua Dean, "Lend Me Your Voice: Discovering Romanity in Seneca's De otio and De brevitate vitae" (2012). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 255. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEND ME YOUR VOICE: DISCOVERING ROMANITY IN SENECA’S DE OTIO AND DE BREVITATE VITAE A Thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Latin by Joshua Dean Wimmer Approved by Dr. E. Del Chrol, Committee Chairperson Dr. Caroline Perkins Dr. Christina Franzen Marshall University May 2012 Copyright by Joshua Dean Wimmer 2012 ii Dedication and Acknowledgments DEDICATION Pro parentibus meis ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would sincerely like to extend my most deeply felt gratitude to Dr. E. Del Chrol, Dr. Caroline Perkins, and Dr. Christina Franzen of the Department of Classics at Marshall University, as well as to any and to all who have helped in some way, no
    [Show full text]