Věstníku Odrúd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Věstníku Odrúd VĚSTNÍK ÚSTŘEDNÍHO KONTROLNÍHO A ZKUŠEBNÍHO ÚSTAVU ZEMĚDĚLSKÉHO Ročník XIX Řada: Národní odrůdový úřad Vydáno: 30. června 2020 Číslo: 3 Č. j.: UKZUZ 103772/2020 SEZNAM ODRŮD zapsaných ve Státní odrůdové knize ke dni 15. června 2020 National List of Varieties listed in the State Variety Book by June 15th, 2020 ___________________________________________________________________________________ BULLETIN OF THE CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR SUPERVISING AND TESTING IN AGRICULTURE Series: NATIONAL PLANT VARIETY OFFICE Czech Gazette for Plant Breeders Rights and National List of Plant Varieties No. XIX/3 of 30 June 2020 ___________________________________________________________________________________ Ústřední kontrolní a zkušební ústav zemědělský, dále jen „Ústav“, podle ustanovení § 33 odst. 4 zákona č. 219/2003 Sb., o uvádění do oběhu osiva a sadby pěstovaných rostlin a o změně některých zákonů (zákon o oběhu osiva a sadby), ve znění pozdějších předpisů, dále jen „zákon“, vydává seznam všech odrůd pěstovaných rostlin zapsaných ve Státní odrůdové knize ke dni 15. 6. 2020, včetně údajů o adresách jejich udržovatelů, držitelů šlechtitelských práv podle zákona č. 408/2000 Sb., o ochraně práv k odrůdám, ve znění pozdějších předpisů, a zmocněných zástupců. Státní odrůdová kniha je úředním seznamem odrůd rostlin, které jsou v České republice zaregistrovány pro uznávání a uvádění do oběhu. Publikace dále obsahuje přehled odrůd, u kterých doba registrace uplynula nebo byla registrace zrušena v souladu s § 37 odst. 1 písm. a) až c) a f) a je stanovena podle § 34 odst. 7 nebo § 37 odst. 4 zákona lhůta pro uznávání a uvádění rozmnožovacího materiálu do oběhu. Ústav vydává seznam odrůd zapsaných ve Státní odrůdové knize každoročně, všechny zápisy, změny a doplňky zápisů jsou průběžně zveřejňovány ve Věstníku Ústavu. The Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, hereinafter „ÚKZÚZ“, publishes the list of all varieties of cultivated plants registered in the State Variety Book to the date of June 15th, 2020 pursuant to Article 33 (4), of Act No. 219/2003 Coll., on the marketing of seed and planting material of cultivated plants and amending certain acts (Act on the marketing of seed and planting material), as last amended, hereinafter „Act“, including the information on addresses of their maintainers and holders of plant breeders rights according to Act No. 408/2000 Coll., on plant variety rights protection, as last amended, and representatives of those persons. The State Variety Book is the National List of plant varieties registered in the Czech Republic for certification and marketing. This publication also contains the overview of varieties deleted from the National List after expiry of the period of validity or pursuant to Article 37 (1) letter a) to c) and f), where a period for certification and marketing pursuant to Article 34 (7) or Article 37 (4) of the Act was set. ÚKZÚZ publishes the list of varieties registered in the State Variety Book annually and all records and amendments are continually published in the Bulletin of ÚKZÚZ. Ústřední kontrolní a zkušební ústav zemědělský Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture CZ - 656 06 Brno, Hroznová 2, Czech Republic Tel.: +420 543 548 111 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.ukzuz.cz Obsah strana Vysvětlivky 5 Registrované odrůdy 7 1. Zemědělské druhy 7 1.1. Obilniny 7 1.2. Krmné plodiny 19 1.2.1. Trávy 19 1.2.2. Luskoviny 27 1.2.3. Jeteloviny 28 1.2.4. Jiné krmné plodiny 30 1.3. Olejniny a přadné rostliny 32 1.4. Brambor a jiné okopaniny 36 2. Chmel 40 3. Réva 41 3.1. Réva 41 3.2. Klony registrovaných odrůd révy 43 4. Zeleninové druhy 46 5. Ovocné rody a druhy 64 5.1. Odrůdy s úředním popisem 64 5.2. Odrůdy s úředně uznaným popisem 70 6. Okrasné druhy 79 Přehled odrůd, u kterých doba registrace uplynula nebo byla registrace zrušena a jejichž rozmnožovací materiál smí být uznáván a uváděn do oběhu ve lhůtě stanovené podle § 34 odst. 7 nebo § 37 odst. 4 zákona 80 Seznam udržovatelů odrůd, držitelů šlechtitelských práv a zmocněných zástupců 82 3 Contents Page Explanatory Notes 5 Registered Varieties 7 1. Agricultural Species 7 1.1. Cereals 7 1.2. Fodder Crops 19 1.2.1. Grasses 19 1.2.2. Grain Legumes 27 1.2.3. Forage Legumes 28 1.2.4. Other Fodder Crops 30 1.3. Oil and Fibre Plants 32 1.4. Potatoes and Root Crops 36 2. Hop 40 3. Vine 41 3.1. Vine 41 3.2. Clones of the registered varieties of vine 43 4. Vegetable Species 46 5. Fruit Genera and Species 64 5.1. Varieties with the official description 64 5.2. Varieties with the officially recognised description 70 6. Ornamental Species 79 Overview of deleted varieties, whose seed and propagating material may be certified and marketed within the period set pursuant to Article 34(7) or Article 37(4) of the Act 80 List of addresses of maintainers, holders of plant breeders rights and representatives of those persons 82 4 Vysvětlivky Název odrůdy - název odrůdy registrovaný v ČR; v závorkách jsou uvedena synonyma Udržovatel - osoba, která je odpovědná za udržovací šlechtění odrůdy; odrůda může mít více udržovatelů Držitel šlechtitelských práv - osoba, která má práva k odrůdě podle zákona č. 408/2000 Sb.; v případě, že práva k odrůdě sdílí více osob, jsou uvedeny všechny tyto osoby *) - podána žádost o udělení ochranných práv podle zákona č. 408/2000 Sb. Zástupce v ČR - osoba pověřená zahraničním udržovatelem zastupováním ve věci odrůdy na území ČR Udržovatelé, držitelé šlechtitelských práv a zástupci v ČR jsou uvedeni pod číselným kódem (viz adresář na konci publikace) Poznámky: H - hybrid Ploidita: D - diploid T - tetraploid P - polyploid 1 - není určeno k využití jako pícnina 7 - 42 chromozómů 8 - 56 chromozómů 12 - apomiktická jednoklonová 17 - pro krmné účely 18 - len olejný 19 - len přadný 38 - odrůda produkující semena s maximálním obsahem glukosinolátu 18 µmol/g a obsahem kyseliny erukové maximálně 2% z celkového obsahu mastných kyselin (odrůda 00) 5 Explanatory Notes Název odrůdy - The variety denomination as registered in the Czech Republic; [Variety denomination] synonyms are indicated in brackets Udržovatel - The person(s) responsible for maintenance of the variety [Maintainer] Držitel šlechtitelských práv - The person having rights to the variety according to Act [Holder of Rights] No. 408/2000 Coll. Where more persons share these rights, all persons are indicated *) - The application for the grant of plant variety rights has been filed Zástupce v ČR - The person authorized by a foreign maintainer for representation [Agent in the Czech Republic] of the variety in the territory of the Czech Republic Maintainers, holders of rights and agents are indicated by a numeric code (see addresses at the end of this publication) Poznámky: [Observations] H - hybrid variety Ploidita: D - diploid [Ploidy] T - tetraploid P - polyploid 1 - not intended for the production of fodder plants 7 - 42 chromosoms 8 - 56 chromosoms 12 - apomictic uni-clonal 17 - for fodder purposes 18 - linseed 19 - flax 38 - variety producing seed with a maximum glucosinolate content of 18 µmol/g and an erucic acid content of not more than 2 % of the total fatty acid content (00 variety) Heading means: Registered Varieties Variety Denomination Maintainer Holder of Agent Inscription Observations Rights Variety Denomination Synonym Inscription 6 Registrované odrůdy Název odrůdy Udržovatel Držitel Zástupce Rok Poznámky šlechtitelských v ČR zápisu práv 1. Zemědělské druhy 1.1. Obilniny Čirok Typ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench hybridu - na siláž 1. Farmsugro 180 434 - 1258 2014 S 2. KWS Merlin 69 - 1165 2015 S 3. KWS Tarzan 69 - 1165 2014 S 4. N52K2562 1634 - 892 2018 S 5. Ruzrok 163 163 - 2016 6. Sweet Caroline 1425 - 1451 2014 S 7. Sweet Susana 1425 - 1451 2014 S Čirok x čirok súdánská tráva Typ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench x Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf hybridu - na siláž 1. KWS Freya 69 - 1165 2014 S Vysvětlivky: Typ hybridu: S dvouliniový hybrid T tříliniový hybrid Ječmen Hordeum vulgare L. - jarní - dvouřadý 1. Accordine 1261 - 255 2018 2. Adam 77 - 255 2020 3. AF Cesar 1204 1204 - 2014 4. AF Lucius 1204 1204 - 2009 5. Aktiv 636 - - 2008 6. Aligator 1150 1150 535 2016 7. Arthur 172 172/1404 - 2013 8. Avus 1150 - 946 2020 9. Azit 636 - - 2008 10. Bente 77 - 255 2018 11. Blaník 1207 - 636 2007 12. Bojos 636 - - 2005 13. Britney 1261 - 255 2014 14. Calcule 1150 - 946 2010 15. Cosmopolitan 1010 - 172 2019 16. Danielle 1261 - 255 2013 17. Delphi 1010 - 172 2011 18. Diplom 77 - 255 2002 19. Explorer 346 - 271 2012 20. Fandaga 77 - 255 2020 21. Forman 77 - 255 2017 22. Francin 172 172/1404 - 2014 23. Gladys 1207 - 636 2010 24. Grace 77 - 946 2010 25. Ismena 77 - 255 2019 26. Kampa 1405 - 636 2015 27. Kangoo 1207 - 636 2008 28. Klarinette 346 - 271 2019 29. Kvorning 1261 - 255 2015 30. KWS Amadora 31 - 271 2015 31. KWS Asta 31 - 271 2014 32. KWS Fantex 31 - 271 2018 33. KWS Irina 31 - 271 2014 34. Laudis 550 636 - - 2013 35. Laureate 697 - 946 2019 36. LG Aurus 1405 - 636 2019 37. LG Ester 1405 - 636 2020 7 Název odrůdy Udržovatel Držitel Zástupce Rok Poznámky šlechtitelských v ČR zápisu práv 38. LG Monus 1405 - 636 2017 39. LG Nabuco 1405 - 636 2018 40. LG Tosca 1405 - 636 2020 41. Malz 636 - - 2002 42. Manta 1261 1261 255 2016 43. Montoya 1261 - 255 2014 44. Odyssey 1405 - 636 2014 45. Olympic 345 - 1162 2013 46. Ovation 1405 - 636 2017 47. Overture 1405 - 636 2014 48. Petrus 1405 - 636 2013 49. Pilote 697 - 268 2018 50. Pionier 346 - 271 2016 51. Pop 346 - 271 2017 52. Prestige 1065 - 1162 2002 53. Prunella 346 - 271 2015 54. Radegast 636 636 - 2005 55. Runner 77 - 255 2019 56. Sanette 1507 - 268 2015 57.
Recommended publications
  • Apples Catalogue 2019
    ADAMS PEARMAIN Herefordshire, England 1862 Oct 15 Nov Mar 14 Adams Pearmain is a an old-fashioned late dessert apple, one of the most popular varieties in Victorian England. It has an attractive 'pearmain' shape. This is a fairly dry apple - which is perhaps not regarded as a desirable attribute today. In spite of this it is actually a very enjoyable apple, with a rich aromatic flavour which in apple terms is usually described as Although it had 'shelf appeal' for the Victorian housewife, its autumnal colouring is probably too subdued to compete with the bright young things of the modern supermarket shelves. Perhaps this is part of its appeal; it recalls a bygone era where subtlety of flavour was appreciated - a lovely apple to savour in front of an open fire on a cold winter's day. Tree hardy. Does will in all soils, even clay. AERLIE RED FLESH (Hidden Rose, Mountain Rose) California 1930’s 19 20 20 Cook Oct 20 15 An amazing red fleshed apple, discovered in Aerlie, Oregon, which may be the best of all red fleshed varieties and indeed would be an outstandingly delicious apple no matter what color the flesh is. A choice seedling, Aerlie Red Flesh has a beautiful yellow skin with pale whitish dots, but it is inside that it excels. Deep rose red flesh, juicy, crisp, hard, sugary and richly flavored, ripening late (October) and keeping throughout the winter. The late Conrad Gemmer, an astute observer of apples with 500 varieties in his collection, rated Hidden Rose an outstanding variety of top quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Osher Lifelong Learning Institute
    USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System Conservation of Fruit & Nut Genetic Resources Joseph Postman Plant Pathologist & Curator National Clonal Germplasm Repository Corvallis, Oregon May 2010 Mission: Collect – Preserve Evaluate – Enhance - Distribute World Diversity of Plant Genetic Resources for Improving the Quality and Production of Economic Crops Important to U.S. and World Agriculture Apple Accessions at Geneva Malus angustifolia ( 59 Accessions) Malus sikkimensis ( 14 Accessions) Malus baccata ( 67 Accessions) Malus sp. ( 41 Accessions) Malus bhutanica ( 117 Accessions) Malus spectabilis ( 9 Accessions) Malus brevipes ( 2 Accessions) Malus sylvestris ( 70 Accessions) Malus coronaria ( 98 Accessions) Malus toringo ( 122 Accessions) Malus domestica ( 1,389 Accessions) Malus transitoria ( 63 Accessions) Malus doumeri ( 2 Accessions) Malus trilobata ( 2 Accessions) Malus florentina ( 4 Accessions) Malus tschonoskii ( 3 Accessions) Malus floribunda ( 12 Accessions) Malus x adstringens ( 2 Accessions) Malus fusca ( 147 Accessions) Malus x arnoldiana ( 2 Accessions) Malus halliana ( 15 Accessions) Malus x asiatica ( 20 Accessions) Malus honanensis ( 4 Accessions) Malus x astracanica ( 1 Accessions) Malus hupehensis ( 185 Accessions) Malus x atrosanguinea ( 2 Accessions) Malus hybrid ( 337 Accessions) Malus x dawsoniana ( 2 Accessions) Malus ioensis ( 72 Accessions) Malus x hartwigii ( 5 Accessions) Malus kansuensis ( 45 Accessions) Malus x magdeburgensis ( 2 Accessions) Malus komarovii ( 1 Accessions) Malus x micromalus ( 25 Accessions)
    [Show full text]
  • Dates of Full Bloom Table 4 Variety Full Bloom Z David Pear 5/18/2014 Z Illinka Pear 5/20/2014 Dolgo Sdl 5 5/26/2014 Dolgo Sdl 6
    Dates of Full Bloom Table 4 Variety Full bloom Variety Full bloom z David pear 5/18/2014 Anoka 5/30/2014 z Illinka Pear 5/20/2014 Beacon 5/30/2014 Dolgo sdl 5 5/26/2014 Connell Red 5/30/2014 Dolgo sdl 6 5/26/2014 Marlin Stephens 5/30/2014 Tasty 5/26/2014 Antonovka 109 5/30/2014 z Staceyville Pear 5/26/2014 Haralred 5/30/2014 Dolgo sdl 2 5/26/2014 Fireside 5/30/2014 Dolgo sdl 4 5/26/2014 Almata 5/30/2014 Antonovka 37 5/26/2014 Freedom 5/30/2014 Treehouse Vanilla 5/26/2014 Haralson 5/30/2014 Dolgo (grafted) 5/26/2014 Prairie Spy 5/30/2014 Parkland 5/26/2014 Bedford 6/1/2014 Norland 5/26/2014 Bethel 6/1/2014 z Luscious Pear 5/26/2014 Centennial Crab 6/1/2014 Antonovka 40 5/26/2014 Cranberry 6/1/2014 Equinox 5/27/2014 Dudley 6/1/2014 Bowing 5/28/2014 Gingergold 6/1/2014 Summerred 5/28/2014 Heyer 12 6/1/2014 z Okolo Pear 5/28/2014 Howgate Wonder 6/1/2014 z Shinseiki Pear 5/28/2014 Irish peach 6/1/2014 z Summercrisp Pear 5/28/2014 Norson 6/1/2014 Crimson Beauty 5/28/2014 Patterson 6/1/2014 Breaky 5/28/2014 Quinte 6/1/2014 Antonovka 37 5/29/2014 Rambo 6/1/2014 Peach 5/29/2014 Ranetka 6/1/2014 Scott Winter 5/29/2014 Red Astrachan 6/1/2014 Adanac 5/30/2014 Red Burke 6/1/2014 Bud 57-233 5/30/2014 Shafer 6/1/2014 Bud 9 5/30/2014 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Varieties in Maine Frederick Charles Bradford
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 6-1911 Apple Varieties in Maine Frederick Charles Bradford Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Agriculture Commons Recommended Citation Bradford, Frederick Charles, "Apple Varieties in Maine" (1911). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2384. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2384 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Maine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE by FREDERICK CHARLES BRADFORD, B. S . Orono, Maine. June, 1911. 8 2 8 5 INTRODUCTION The following pages represent an effort to trace the causes of the changing procession of varieties of apples grown in Maine. To this end the history of fruit growing in Maine has been carefully studied, largely through the Agricultural Reports from 1850 to 1909 and the columns of the Maine Farmer fran 1838 to 1875. The inquiry has been confined as rigidly as possible to this state, out­ side sources being referred to only for sake of compari­ son. Rather incidentally, soil influences, modifications due to climate, etc., have been considered. Naturally* since the inquiry was limited to printed record, nothing new has been discovered in this study. Perhaps a somewhat new point of view has been achieved. And, since early Maine pomological literature has been rather neglected by our leading writers, some few forgot­ ten facts have been exhumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Variety Description Origin Approximate Ripening Uses
    Approximate Variety Description Origin Ripening Uses Yellow Transparent Tart, crisp Imported from Russia by USDA in 1870s Early July All-purpose Lodi Tart, somewhat firm New York, Early 1900s. Montgomery x Transparent. Early July Baking, sauce Pristine Sweet-tart PRI (Purdue Rutgers Illinois) release, 1994. Mid-late July All-purpose Dandee Red Sweet-tart, semi-tender New Ohio variety. An improved PaulaRed type. Early August Eating, cooking Redfree Mildly tart and crunchy PRI release, 1981. Early-mid August Eating Sansa Sweet, crunchy, juicy Japan, 1988. Akane x Gala. Mid August Eating Ginger Gold G. Delicious type, tangier G Delicious seedling found in Virginia, late 1960s. Mid August All-purpose Zestar! Sweet-tart, crunchy, juicy U Minn, 1999. State Fair x MN 1691. Mid August Eating, cooking St Edmund's Pippin Juicy, crisp, rich flavor From Bury St Edmunds, 1870. Mid August Eating, cider Chenango Strawberry Mildly tart, berry flavors 1850s, Chenango County, NY Mid August Eating, cooking Summer Rambo Juicy, tart, aromatic 16th century, Rambure, France. Mid-late August Eating, sauce Honeycrisp Sweet, very crunchy, juicy U Minn, 1991. Unknown parentage. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Burgundy Tart, crisp 1974, from NY state Late Aug.-early Sept. All-purpose Blondee Sweet, crunchy, juicy New Ohio apple. Related to Gala. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Gala Sweet, crisp New Zealand, 1934. Golden Delicious x Cox Orange. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Swiss Gourmet Sweet-tart, juicy Switzerland. Golden x Idared. Late Aug.-early Sept. All-purpose Golden Supreme Sweet, Golden Delcious type Idaho, 1960. Golden Delicious seedling Early September Eating, cooking Pink Pearl Sweet-tart, bright pink flesh California, 1944, developed from Surprise Early September All-purpose Autumn Crisp Juicy, slow to brown Golden Delicious x Monroe.
    [Show full text]
  • Cedar-Apple Rust
    DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & EXTENSION Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Arkansas System FSA7538 Cedar-Apple Rust Stephen Vann Introduction Assistant Professor ­ One of the most spectacular Extension Urban Plant Pathologist diseases to appear in spring is cedar- apple rust. This disease is caused by the fungus Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae and requires both cedar and apple trees to survive each year. It is mainly a problem in the eastern portion of North America and is most important on apple or crab ­ Figure 2. Cedar-apple rust on crabapple apple (Malus sp), but can also affect foliage. quince and hawthorn. yellow-orange color (Figures 1 and 2). Symptoms On the upper leaf surface of these spots, the fungus produces specialized The chief damage by this disease fruiting bodies called spermagonia. On occurs on apple trees, causing early the lower leaf surface (and sometimes leaf drop and poor quality fruit. This on fruit), raised hair-like fruiting bod­ can be a significant problem to com­ ies called aecia (Figure 3) appear as mercial apple growers but also harms microscopic cup-shaped structures. the appearance of ornamental crab ­ Wet, rainy weather conditions favor apples in the home landscape. On severe infection of the apple. The apple, symptoms first appear as fungus forms large galls on cedar trees small green-yellow leaf or fruit spots in the spring (see next section), but that gradually enlarge to become a these structures do not greatly harm Arkansas Is Our Campus Visit our web site at: Figure 1. Cedar-apple rust (leaf spot) on Figure 3. Aecia of cedar-apple rust on https://www.uaex.uada.edu apple (courtesy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Apples: Organic Production Guide
    A project of the National Center for Appropriate Technology 1-800-346-9140 • www.attra.ncat.org Apples: Organic Production Guide By Tammy Hinman This publication provides information on organic apple production from recent research and producer and Guy Ames, NCAT experience. Many aspects of apple production are the same whether the grower uses low-spray, organic, Agriculture Specialists or conventional management. Accordingly, this publication focuses on the aspects that differ from Published nonorganic practices—primarily pest and disease control, marketing, and economics. (Information on March 2011 organic weed control and fertility management in orchards is presented in a separate ATTRA publica- © NCAT tion, Tree Fruits: Organic Production Overview.) This publication introduces the major apple insect pests IP020 and diseases and the most effective organic management methods. It also includes farmer profiles of working orchards and a section dealing with economic and marketing considerations. There is an exten- sive list of resources for information and supplies and an appendix on disease-resistant apple varieties. Contents Introduction ......................1 Geographical Factors Affecting Disease and Pest Management ...........3 Insect and Mite Pests .....3 Insect IPM in Apples - Kaolin Clay ........6 Diseases ........................... 14 Mammal and Bird Pests .........................20 Thinning ..........................20 Weed and Orchard Floor Management ......20 Economics and Marketing ........................22 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Phenolic Compounds As Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity
    foods Review Phenolic Compounds as Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity Vakare˙ Merkyte˙ 1,2 , Edoardo Longo 1,2,* , Giulia Windisch 1,2 and Emanuele Boselli 1,2 1 Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy; [email protected] (V.M.); [email protected] (G.W.); [email protected] (E.B.) 2 Oenolab, NOI Techpark South Tyrol, Via A. Volta 13B, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0471-017691 Received: 29 October 2020; Accepted: 28 November 2020; Published: 1 December 2020 Abstract: Targeted and untargeted determinations are being currently applied to different classes of natural phenolics to develop an integrated approach aimed at ensuring compliance to regulatory prescriptions related to specific quality parameters of wine production. The regulations are particularly severe for wine and include various aspects of the viticulture practices and winemaking techniques. Nevertheless, the use of phenolic profiles for quality control is still fragmented and incomplete, even if they are a promising tool for quality evaluation. Only a few methods have been already validated and widely applied, and an integrated approach is in fact still missing because of the complex dependence of the chemical profile of wine on many viticultural and enological factors, which have not been clarified yet. For example, there is a lack of studies about the phenolic composition in relation to the wine authenticity of white and especially rosé wines. This review is a bibliographic account on the approaches based on phenolic species that have been developed for the evaluation of wine quality and frauds, from the grape varieties (of V.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Apple Clones in the United States
    Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. 5 ARS 34-37-1 May 1963 A Survey of Apple Clones in the United States u. S. DFPT. OF AGRffini r U>2 4 L964 Agricultural Research Service U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PREFACE This publication reports on surveys of the deciduous fruit and nut clones being maintained at the Federal and State experiment stations in the United States. It will b- published in three c parts: I. Apples, II. Stone Fruit. , UI, Pears, Nuts, and Other Fruits. This survey was conducted at the request of the National Coor- dinating Committee on New Crops. Its purpose is to obtain an indication of the volume of material that would be involved in establishing clonal germ plasm repositories for the use of fruit breeders throughout the country. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Gratitude is expressed for the assistance of H. F. Winters of the New Crops Research Branch, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, under whose direction the questionnaire was designed and initial distribution made. The author also acknowledges the work of D. D. Dolan, W. R. Langford, W. H. Skrdla, and L. A. Mullen, coordinators of the New Crops Regional Cooperative Program, through whom the data used in this survey were obtained from the State experiment stations. Finally, it is recognized that much extracurricular work was expended by the various experiment stations in completing the questionnaires. : CONTENTS Introduction 1 Germany 298 Key to reporting stations. „ . 4 Soviet Union . 302 Abbreviations used in descriptions .... 6 Sweden . 303 Sports United States selections 304 Baldwin.
    [Show full text]
  • Treeid Variety Run 2 DNA Milb005 American Summer Pearmain
    TreeID Variety Run 2 DNA Run 1 DNA DNA Sa… Sourc… Field Notes milb005 American Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain we2g016 AmericanDot" Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain we2f017 AmericanDot" Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain we2f018 AmericanDot" Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain eckh001 BaldwinDot" Baldwin-SSE6 eckh008 Baldwin Baldwin-SSE6 2lwt007 Baldwin Baldwin-SSE6 2lwt011 Baldwin Baldwin-SSE6 schd019 Ben Davis Ben Davis mild006 Ben Davis Ben Davis wayb004 Ben Davis Ben Davis andt019 Ben Davis Ben Davis ostt014 Ben Davis Ben Davis watt008 Ben Davis Ben Davis wida036 Ben Davis Ben Davis eckg002 Ben Davis Ben Davis frea009 Ben Davis Ben Davis frei009 Ben Davis Ben Davis frem009 Ben Davis Ben Davis fres009 Ben Davis Ben Davis wedg004 Ben Davis Ben Davis frai006 Ben Davis Ben Davis frag004 Ben Davis Ben Davis frai004 Ben Davis Ben Davis fram006 Ben Davis Ben Davis spor004 Ben Davis Ben Davis coue002 Ben Davis Ben Davis couf001 Ben Davis Ben Davis coug008 Ben Davis Ben Davis, error on DNA sample list, listed as we2a023 Ben Davis Bencoug006 Davis cria001 Ben Davis Ben Davis cria008 Ben Davis Ben Davis we2v002 Ben Davis Ben Davis we2z007 Ben Davis Ben Davis rilcolo Ben Davis Ben Davis koct004 Ben Davis Ben Davis koct005 Ben Davis Ben Davis mush002 Ben Davis Ben Davis sc3b005-gan Ben Davis Ben Davis sche019 Ben Davis, poss Black Ben Ben Davis sche020 Ben Davis, poss Gano Ben Davis schi020 Ben Davis, poss Gano Ben Davis ca2e001 Bietigheimer Bietigheimer/Sweet
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Characteristics of Wine Made by Disease Tolerant Varieties
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI UDINE in agreement with FONDAZIONE EDMUND MACH PhD School in Agricultural Science and Biotechnology Cycle XXX Doctoral Thesis Chemical characteristics of wine made by disease tolerant varieties PhD Candidate Supervisor Silvia Ruocco Dr. Urska Vrhovsek Co-Supervisor Prof. Doris Rauhut DEFENCE YEAR 2018 To the best gift that life gave us: to you Nonna Rosa CONTENTS Abstract 1 Aim of the PhD project 2 Chapter 1 Introduction 3 Preface to Chapter 2 17 Chapter 2 The metabolomic profile of red non-V. vinifera genotypes 19 Preface to Chapter 3 and 4 50 Chapter 3 Study of the composition of grape from disease tolerant varieties 56 Chapter 4 Investigation of volatile and non-volatile compounds of wine 79 produced by disease tolerant varieties Concluding remarks 140 Summary of PhD experiences 141 Acknowledgements 142 Abstract Vitis vinifera L. is the most widely cultivated Vitis species around the world which includes a great number of cultivars. Owing to the superior quality of their grapes, these cultivars were long considered the only suitable for the production of high quality wines. However, the lack of resistance genes to fungal diseases like powdery and downy mildew (Uncinula necator and Plasmopara viticola) makes it necessary the application of huge amounts of chemical products in vineyard. Thus, the search for alternative and more sustainable methods to control the major grapevine pathogens have increased the interest in new disease tolerant varieties. Chemical characterisation of these varieties is an important prerequisite to evaluate and promote their use on the global wine market. The aim of this project was to produce a comprehensive study of some promising new disease tolerant varieties recently introduced to the cultivation by identifying the peculiar aspects of their composition and measuring their positive and negative quality traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Temperature Injury to Apple Trees in Maine M
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 6-1-1973 TB64: Low Temperature Injury to Apple Trees in Maine M. T. Hilborn W. C. Stiles Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Fruit Science Commons Recommended Citation Hilborn, M.T., and W.C. Stiles. 1973. Low temperatur injury to apple trees in Maine. Life Sciences and Agriculture Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 64. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Low Temperature Injury To Apple Trees in Maine M. T. HILBORN and W. C. Stiles FE SCIENCES AND AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF MAINE AT ORONO iCHNICAL BULLETIN 64 JUNE 1973 Table of Contents PAGES Introduction 3 Winter killing of apple trees in Maine in 1933-34 4 Hardy trunk-forming stocks 9 Age of the Ironclads 9 Revi\al of Hardy trunk-forming stocks 10 The Patten Orchard 11 Trunk-forming stock planting at Highmoor Farm 12 Characteristics of a trunk-forming stock 15 Growth in circumference 16 Other characteristics 17 Rapidity of top-working 17 Stem pitting virus 19 Influence of stock-scion combination on hardiness 19 Specific conductivity studies 20 Artificial freezing studies 23 Final Orchard Evaluation 27 Discussion 28 Conclusions 30 Literature cited 30 low Temperature Injury to Apple Trees in Maine M.T. Hilborn and W.C.
    [Show full text]