Apples: Organic Production Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Apples: Organic Production Guide A project of the National Center for Appropriate Technology 1-800-346-9140 • www.attra.ncat.org Apples: Organic Production Guide By Tammy Hinman This publication provides information on organic apple production from recent research and producer and Guy Ames, NCAT experience. Many aspects of apple production are the same whether the grower uses low-spray, organic, Agriculture Specialists or conventional management. Accordingly, this publication focuses on the aspects that differ from Published nonorganic practices—primarily pest and disease control, marketing, and economics. (Information on March 2011 organic weed control and fertility management in orchards is presented in a separate ATTRA publica- © NCAT tion, Tree Fruits: Organic Production Overview.) This publication introduces the major apple insect pests IP020 and diseases and the most effective organic management methods. It also includes farmer profiles of working orchards and a section dealing with economic and marketing considerations. There is an exten- sive list of resources for information and supplies and an appendix on disease-resistant apple varieties. Contents Introduction ......................1 Geographical Factors Affecting Disease and Pest Management ...........3 Insect and Mite Pests .....3 Insect IPM in Apples - Kaolin Clay ........6 Diseases ........................... 14 Mammal and Bird Pests .........................20 Thinning ..........................20 Weed and Orchard Floor Management ......20 Economics and Marketing ........................22 Conclusion ......................25 Appendix 1: Disease Resistant Apple Varieties ..............26 References .....................32 Photo: Elderberry Farm and Restaurant Further Resources ........34 Acknowledgments Introduction This publication draws on previous ATTRA pub- Apples, Malus sp., are among the most diffi- lications on apple production written by Richard cult crops to grow organically. They are prone The National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service, Earles, Guy Ames, Radhika Balasubrahmanyam, to attack by more pests than perhaps any other ATTRA (www.attra.ncat.org), Holly Born, and Rex Dufour. was developed and is managed crop. Without effective management, the worst by the National Center for of these pests can be devastating—to the fruit, Appropriate Technology (NCAT). We recognize the tried-and-true experience The project is funded through of organic orchardists and draw extensively to the grower’s spirit, and to the bottom line. a cooperative agreement with To minimize or eliminate chemical inputs while the United States Department from them in this publication. Special thanks of Agriculture’s Rural Business- to the farms that agreed to be profiled in this keeping yields and profits sound, the grower must Cooperative Service. Visit the NCAT website (www.ncat.org/ publication: Elderberry Farm and Restaurant, develop a detailed understanding of the orchard sarc_current.php) for Skaneateles, New York; Hoch Orchard and Gar- as a managed ecosystem. In this regard, there is more information on our other sustainable dens, LaCrescent, Minnesota; and Home Acres no substitute for direct observation and experi- agriculture and Orchard in Stevensville, Montana. energy projects. ence, along with a willingness to experiment. As the organic market for apples increases, more This publication touches on some orchard- organic management options are available to floor and weed-management options specific growers. This publication will outline many of to apples. More information on organic weed these options for pest and disease management as control and fertility management in orchards is well as describe marketing options and enterprise available in ATTRA’s Tree Fruits: Organic Pro- evaluation for organic apples. duction Overview. For an introduction to IPM principles and practices, see ATTRA’s Biointen- A note on terms: sive Integrated Pest Management. Organic fruit production involves more than Geographic and climatic considerations, cultivar simply excluding synthetic pesticides and fer- selection, the local pest complex, market prices, tilizers. Benign neglect does not meet National production costs, and other factors all influence Organic Program standards for production, nor the design and viability of an organic system. would it satisfactorily manage the numerous Because this publication is national in scope, it pest species that frequent the apple. Organic agriculture is an integrated approach of active can only introduce the most common pest and and observant management of a farming sys- disease problems and selected organic control tem. The USDA’s National Organic Program strategies. No method presented here will be (NOP) defines organic production as “A produc- appropriate for every orchard or every region. tion system that is managed … to respond to The following is a set of guidelines, not prescrip- site-specific conditions by integrating cultural, tions. The individual producer must try various biological, and mechanical practices that foster tools and evaluate them according to efficacy, cycling of resources, promote ecological bal- cost, production, marketing goals, and personal ance, and conserve biodiversity.” preferences. Included in this publication are references to What begins as a fragmented pest-by-pest set of the organic standards authorized by the USDA’s tactics must gradually form an overall manage- National Organic Program, www.ams.usda.gov/ ment plan in which the various strategies work nop. Organic producers should verify with an accredited certification agency that their prac- together as much as possible. The publications tices and any materials they intend to use are Twenty Years of Apple Production Under an Eco- compliant with NOP standards. In addition, if a logical Approach to Pest Management, by Ron farmer is planning on marketing internationally, Prokopy, and The Apple Grower: A Guide for there may be further production and labeling the Organic Orchardist, by Michael Phillips, are requirements. ATTRA has numerous resources excellent guides for an orchardist transitioning on beginning or transitioning to organic pro- to organic production. The Further Resources duction. See Guide to ATTRA’s Organic Publica- section has information on how to obtain these tions for an overview of these. publications. Obstacles to organic apple production include the following: • Cultural guidelines for controlling one pest may create conditions that favor another pest. • Many organic pest-control tactics tend to give highly variable results from loca- tion to location and year to year. • Traditional local support services are often unable to provide much informa- tion or guidance. • The practices may be labor and/or capi- tal intensive. Apples can be difficut to grow organically. Photo: Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, Bug- wood.org Page 2 ATTRA Apples: Organic Production Guide Geographical Factors Northeast Major Diseases: scab, re blight, Affecting Disease and mildew, cedar apple rust, sooty blotch, Pest Management Coastal summer rots increasing West Key Insects: codling moth, West of the “tree line” (approximately the 97th plum curculio, trunk borers, Major Diseases: West European sawy, apple maggot, meridian, a line running roughly from Fort scab, re blight, Major Diseases: catfacing bugs (including powdery mildew re blight, powdery mildew, marmorated stink bug) Worth, Texas, to Fargo, North Dakota) a major some scab pressure Key Insects: pest of many tree fruits—the plum curculio—is codling moth, Key Insects: codling moth, apple maggot catfacing bugs, not present. This fact, coupled with reduced dis- (few but Oriental fruit moth ease pressure, facilitates organic production of quarantine in eect) Southeast apples in much of the West. The many large-scale Major Diseases: scab (little less organic apple orchards in Washington and Cali- than NE), re blight, cedar apple rust, sooty blotch, summer rots severe fornia are testament to the relative ease of organic Key Insects: plum curculio, apple production in that part of the country. codling moth, Oriental fruit moth, Common Apple Pests by Region trunk borers, catfacing bugs Eastern growers, on the other hand, must con- tend with the plum curculio and increased inci- dence of fungal diseases. Northeastern growers For instance, mating disruption for codling have the apple maggot as an additional major moth only works on codling moth; Bacil- pest. In the Southeast, fruit rots can be especially lus thuringiensis is effective against some lepi- troublesome. The prognosis for eastern organic dopteran species but not hemipterans, coleop- apple production is starting to look up, however. terans, etc.; borers necessitate their own separate Through a combination of innovative pest-man- control efforts; sulfur works reasonably well agement strategies and diligent research, many against rust but not at all against blight; and one of the issues associated with organic apple pro- cultivar that is resistant to scab may not be resis- duction in the East are beginning to be resolved. tant to any other disease. Surround, a kaolin-clay-based pesticide, has dramatically changed the face of organic fruit So even though in theory it appeared that production in the eastern U.S. These control apples could be grown organically if all these measures are time and management intensive, approaches were employed, it was generally however, and growers need to account for addi- only the most meticulous, energetic, and well- tional pest-management
Recommended publications
  • APPLE (Fruit Varieties)
    E TG/14/9 ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2005-04-06 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS GENEVA * APPLE (Fruit Varieties) UPOV Code: MALUS_DOM (Malus domestica Borkh.) GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY Alternative Names:* Botanical name English French German Spanish Malus domestica Apple Pommier Apfel Manzano Borkh. The purpose of these guidelines (“Test Guidelines”) is to elaborate the principles contained in the General Introduction (document TG/1/3), and its associated TGP documents, into detailed practical guidance for the harmonized examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) and, in particular, to identify appropriate characteristics for the examination of DUS and production of harmonized variety descriptions. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS These Test Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the General Introduction and its associated TGP documents. Other associated UPOV documents: TG/163/3 Apple Rootstocks TG/192/1 Ornamental Apple * These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.] i:\orgupov\shared\tg\applefru\tg 14 9 e.doc TG/14/9 Apple, 2005-04-06 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. SUBJECT OF THESE TEST GUIDELINES..................................................................................................3 2. MATERIAL REQUIRED ...............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Variety Description Origin Approximate Ripening Uses
    Approximate Variety Description Origin Ripening Uses Yellow Transparent Tart, crisp Imported from Russia by USDA in 1870s Early July All-purpose Lodi Tart, somewhat firm New York, Early 1900s. Montgomery x Transparent. Early July Baking, sauce Pristine Sweet-tart PRI (Purdue Rutgers Illinois) release, 1994. Mid-late July All-purpose Dandee Red Sweet-tart, semi-tender New Ohio variety. An improved PaulaRed type. Early August Eating, cooking Redfree Mildly tart and crunchy PRI release, 1981. Early-mid August Eating Sansa Sweet, crunchy, juicy Japan, 1988. Akane x Gala. Mid August Eating Ginger Gold G. Delicious type, tangier G Delicious seedling found in Virginia, late 1960s. Mid August All-purpose Zestar! Sweet-tart, crunchy, juicy U Minn, 1999. State Fair x MN 1691. Mid August Eating, cooking St Edmund's Pippin Juicy, crisp, rich flavor From Bury St Edmunds, 1870. Mid August Eating, cider Chenango Strawberry Mildly tart, berry flavors 1850s, Chenango County, NY Mid August Eating, cooking Summer Rambo Juicy, tart, aromatic 16th century, Rambure, France. Mid-late August Eating, sauce Honeycrisp Sweet, very crunchy, juicy U Minn, 1991. Unknown parentage. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Burgundy Tart, crisp 1974, from NY state Late Aug.-early Sept. All-purpose Blondee Sweet, crunchy, juicy New Ohio apple. Related to Gala. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Gala Sweet, crisp New Zealand, 1934. Golden Delicious x Cox Orange. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Swiss Gourmet Sweet-tart, juicy Switzerland. Golden x Idared. Late Aug.-early Sept. All-purpose Golden Supreme Sweet, Golden Delcious type Idaho, 1960. Golden Delicious seedling Early September Eating, cooking Pink Pearl Sweet-tart, bright pink flesh California, 1944, developed from Surprise Early September All-purpose Autumn Crisp Juicy, slow to brown Golden Delicious x Monroe.
    [Show full text]
  • Germplasm Sets and Standardized Phenotyping Protocols for Fruit Quality Traits in Rosbreed
    Germplasm Sets and Standardized Phenotyping Protocols for Fruit Quality Traits in RosBREED Jim Luby, Breeding Team Leader Outline of Presentation RosBREED Demonstration Breeding Programs Standardized Phenotyping Protocols Reference Germplasm Sets SNP Detection Panels Crop Reference Set Breeding Pedigree Set RosBREED Demonstration Breeding Programs Clemson U WSU Texas A&M UC Davis U Minn U Arkansas Rosaceae Cornell U WSU MSU MSU Phenotyping Affiliates USDA-ARS Driscolls Corvallis Univ of Florida UNH Standardized Phenotyping Protocols Traits and Standardized Phenotyping Protocols • Identify critical fruit quality traits and other important traits • Develop standardized phenotyping protocols to enable data pooling across locations/institutions • Protocols available at www.RosBREED.org Apple Standardized Phenotyping Firmness, Crispness – Instrumental, Sensory Sweetness, Acidity – Intstrumental, Sensory Color, Appearance, Juiciness, Aroma – Sensory At harvest Cracking, Russet, Sunburn Storage 10w+7d Storage 20w+7d Maturity Fruit size 5 fruit (reps) per evaluation Postharvest disorders Harvest date, Crop, Dropping RosBREED Apple Phenotyping Locations Wenatchee, WA St Paul, MN Geneva, NY • One location for all evaluations would reduce variation among instruments and evaluators • Local evaluations more sustainable and relevant for future efforts at each institution • Conduct standardized phenotyping of Germplasm Sets at respective sites over multiple (2-3) seasons • Collate data in PBA format, conduct quality control, archive Reference
    [Show full text]
  • Cedar-Apple Rust
    DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & EXTENSION Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Arkansas System FSA7538 Cedar-Apple Rust Stephen Vann Introduction Assistant Professor ­ One of the most spectacular Extension Urban Plant Pathologist diseases to appear in spring is cedar- apple rust. This disease is caused by the fungus Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae and requires both cedar and apple trees to survive each year. It is mainly a problem in the eastern portion of North America and is most important on apple or crab ­ Figure 2. Cedar-apple rust on crabapple apple (Malus sp), but can also affect foliage. quince and hawthorn. yellow-orange color (Figures 1 and 2). Symptoms On the upper leaf surface of these spots, the fungus produces specialized The chief damage by this disease fruiting bodies called spermagonia. On occurs on apple trees, causing early the lower leaf surface (and sometimes leaf drop and poor quality fruit. This on fruit), raised hair-like fruiting bod­ can be a significant problem to com­ ies called aecia (Figure 3) appear as mercial apple growers but also harms microscopic cup-shaped structures. the appearance of ornamental crab ­ Wet, rainy weather conditions favor apples in the home landscape. On severe infection of the apple. The apple, symptoms first appear as fungus forms large galls on cedar trees small green-yellow leaf or fruit spots in the spring (see next section), but that gradually enlarge to become a these structures do not greatly harm Arkansas Is Our Campus Visit our web site at: Figure 1. Cedar-apple rust (leaf spot) on Figure 3. Aecia of cedar-apple rust on https://www.uaex.uada.edu apple (courtesy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Tree Pollinators Chart
    Apple Tree Pollinators Chart Pollen Source Anna Arkansas Black Hills Beverly Braeburn Cortland Dorsett Golden Ein Shemer Fuji Gala Ginger Gold Golden Delicious Gordon Smith Granny Haralred Haralson Honeycrisp Honeygold Jonagold Jonathan Liberty Lodi McIntosh GoldOzark Lady Pink Red Delicious Red Rome Spartan Stayman Winesap River Wolf Delicious Yellow Transparent Yellow Anna Arkansas Black Beverly Hills Braeburn Cortland Dorsett Golden Ein Shemer Fuji Gala Ginger Gold Golden Delicious Gordon Granny Smith Haralred Haralson Honeycrisp Honeygold Jonagold Jonathan Liberty Lodi Selected Variety McIntosh Ozark Gold Pink Lady Red Delicious Red Rome Spartan Stayman Winesap Wolf River Yellow Delicious Yellow Transparent Pair with a Key: another variety Not a pollinizer Good pollinizer for best results Blueberry Shrub Pollinators Chart Pollen Source 3 in 1 Blueberry Biloxi Bluecrop Bluegold Blue Profusion Brightwell Duke Elliott Gupton Hardiblue Jersey Jubilee Misty Northcountry Northland Northsky O'Neal Lemonade Pink Polaris Blue Powder Reka Sharpblue Sunshine Blue Superior Tifblue Tophat 3 in 1 Blueberry (northern) Biloxi (southern) Bluecrop (northern) Bluegold (northern) Blue Profusion (northern) Brightwell (rabbiteye) Duke (northern) Elliott (northern) Gupton (southern) Hardiblue (northern) Jersey (northern) Jubilee (southern) Misty (southern) Northcountry (half-high) Northland (half-high) Northsky (half-high) Selected Variety O'Neal (southern) Pink Lemonade (rabbiteye) Polaris (half-high) Powder Blue (rabbiteye) Reka (northern) Sharpblue (southern)
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text [PDF]
    ® Fruit, Vegetable and Cereal Science and Biotechnology ©2011 Global Science Books Apple Breeding – From the Origin to Genetic Engineering Andreas Peil1* • Markus Kellerhals2 • Monika Höfer1 • Henryk Flachowsky1 1 Julius Kühn-Institut - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI), Institute for Breeding Research on Horticultural and Fruit Crops, Pillnitzer Platz 3a, D-01326 Dresden, Germany 2 Swiss Federal Research Station Agroscope Changins-Wädenswil, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland Corresponding author : * [email protected] ABSTRACT Apple is the most important temperate fruit crop and ranks fourth in world production of fruits after citrus, grapes and bananas. Although more than 10,000 cultivars are documented, only a few dozen are grown on a commercial scale worldwide. Despite the abundant number of cultivars there is a demand for new cultivars better adapted to climatic conditions/changes and sustainable production. Yet, the challenge for apple breeding is the establishment of improved, multiple disease resistant cultivars with high and regularly yield suited for modern production systems. Due to the fast development of molecular techniques an increasing knowledge on the genome of apple is available, e.g. the whole genome sequence of ‘Golden Delicious’ (Velasco et al. 2010). Molecular markers for a lot of major traits, mostly resistance genes, and QTLs facilitate marker assisted selection, especially the pyramiding of resistance genes to achieve more durable resistance. Mainly the breakdown of the Rvi6 (Vf) scab resistance enhanced the breeding for pyramided resistance genes. But nevertheless, until now there is a gap between the existing molecular knowledge and its application in apple breeding. This paper will focus on the origin and domestication of apple, breeding objectives and classical as well as molecular approaches to achieve breeding aims.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pathogenicity and Seasonal Development of Gymnosporangium
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1931 The ap thogenicity and seasonal development of Gymnosporangium in Iowa Donald E. Bliss Iowa State College Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agriculture Commons, Botany Commons, and the Plant Pathology Commons Recommended Citation Bliss, Donald E., "The ap thogenicity and seasonal development of Gymnosporangium in Iowa " (1931). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 14209. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/14209 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMl films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMl a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g.. maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overiaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasting Room Bottle Menu V8 Front
    Bottles Available: 375ml - $12 750ml - $18 Semi-dry Medium Semi-Sweet PRESSED, FERMENTED, AND BOTTLED IN AURORA, CO www.HaykinFamilyCider.Com Masonville Orchards Seasonal Series Dry Summer [6.6% ABV] - Masonville Orchards,CO - On the Front Range, summer apples ripen in July and August. Their flavors tend toward a lively and sprightly acidity. This cider is evocative of summer with bright fruity notes of vanilla and fresh apple. This blend includes dozens of summer varieties, Including William’s Pride, Akane, Pristine, Sansa, Redfree and others. 2018 SILVER medal winner at GLINTCAP Semi-Dry Early Fall [7.7% ABV] - Masonville Orchards, CO - This cider is made from apples that ripen in early fall at Masonville Orchards. There are dozens of varieties of apples in this blend including Wolf River, Lamb Abbey Pearmain, Kinderkrisp, Cortland and others. The cider is rich and creamy with soft and round fruity qualities. Medium Late Fall [6.3% ABV] - Masonville Orchards, CO - This cider is made from apples that ripen in late fall at Masonville Orchards. There are dozens of varieties of apples in this blend including Jonathan, Ruby Jon, Ozark Gold, Honeycrisp, Empire, Jonagold, Bella. This cider is rich yet delicate with lemon and raspberry tartness. 2018 SILVER medal winner at GLINTCAP Semi-Sweet Winter [6.4% ABV] - Masonville Orchards, CO - This cider is made from the last apples to ripen at Masonville Orchards. There are dozens of varieties of apples in this blend including Goldrush, Arkansas Black, Rome Beauty, Charlie's Gold and others. The cider has a big complex vanilla and fruit-filled aroma.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit, Nut & Grape Varieties for the Contra Costa Home Orchard
    ccmg.ucanr.edu February 2020 Fruit, Nut & Grape Varieties for the Contra Costa Home Orchard by Janet Caprile, Contra Costa County Farm Advisor Emeritus NOTES: The County has been divided into 4 climate zones based on those outlined in the Sunset Western Garden Book. The zones include: Zone 17: Coastal strips Kensington San Pablo Rodeo (bayside) El Cerrito Pinole (bayside) Crockett Richmond Hercules (bayside) Zone 16: Northern California coast thermal belts Orinda (far west) Zone 15: Chilly winters areas along the Coast Range Orinda (central) Martinez (central & west) Walnut Creek (most) El Sobrante Pacheco Alamo (east of Hwy 680) Pinole (inland) Pleasant Hill Danville ( most) Hercules (inland) Concord (most) Rodeo (inland) Clayton Zone 14: Northern California’s inland area with some ocean influence Pittsburg Orinda (east) Alamo (west of Hwy 680) Antioch Moraga Danville (part) Oakley Lafayette Blackhawk Brentwood Walnut Creek (west of Hwy 680) San Ramon Discovery Bay Concord (part) Byron Martinez ( east) Refer to this Sunset website to find your “zone”: https://www.sunset.com/garden/climate-zones/sunset-climate-zone- bay-area LEGEND: COMMONLY GROWN AND COMMONLY AVAILABLE VARIETIES SHOWN IN BOLDFACE TYPE. Parentheses indicate zones that may support the listed fruit variety but are not ideal. v-2020-02-27 1 of 18 The University of California prohibits discrimination or harassment of any person in any of its programs or activities. See the complete Nondiscrimination Statement at ucanr.edu. ccmg.ucanr.edu Fruit, Nut & Grape Varieties for the Contra Costa Home Orchard February 2020 ALMOND Almonds have a low chill requirement (200-300 hours) but need summer heat to mature a crop.
    [Show full text]
  • Treeid Variety Run 2 DNA Milb005 American Summer Pearmain
    TreeID Variety Run 2 DNA Run 1 DNA DNA Sa… Sourc… Field Notes milb005 American Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain we2g016 AmericanDot" Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain we2f017 AmericanDot" Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain we2f018 AmericanDot" Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain eckh001 BaldwinDot" Baldwin-SSE6 eckh008 Baldwin Baldwin-SSE6 2lwt007 Baldwin Baldwin-SSE6 2lwt011 Baldwin Baldwin-SSE6 schd019 Ben Davis Ben Davis mild006 Ben Davis Ben Davis wayb004 Ben Davis Ben Davis andt019 Ben Davis Ben Davis ostt014 Ben Davis Ben Davis watt008 Ben Davis Ben Davis wida036 Ben Davis Ben Davis eckg002 Ben Davis Ben Davis frea009 Ben Davis Ben Davis frei009 Ben Davis Ben Davis frem009 Ben Davis Ben Davis fres009 Ben Davis Ben Davis wedg004 Ben Davis Ben Davis frai006 Ben Davis Ben Davis frag004 Ben Davis Ben Davis frai004 Ben Davis Ben Davis fram006 Ben Davis Ben Davis spor004 Ben Davis Ben Davis coue002 Ben Davis Ben Davis couf001 Ben Davis Ben Davis coug008 Ben Davis Ben Davis, error on DNA sample list, listed as we2a023 Ben Davis Bencoug006 Davis cria001 Ben Davis Ben Davis cria008 Ben Davis Ben Davis we2v002 Ben Davis Ben Davis we2z007 Ben Davis Ben Davis rilcolo Ben Davis Ben Davis koct004 Ben Davis Ben Davis koct005 Ben Davis Ben Davis mush002 Ben Davis Ben Davis sc3b005-gan Ben Davis Ben Davis sche019 Ben Davis, poss Black Ben Ben Davis sche020 Ben Davis, poss Gano Ben Davis schi020 Ben Davis, poss Gano Ben Davis ca2e001 Bietigheimer Bietigheimer/Sweet
    [Show full text]
  • Handling of Apple Transport Techniques and Efficiency Vibration, Damage and Bruising Texture, Firmness and Quality
    Centre of Excellence AGROPHYSICS for Applied Physics in Sustainable Agriculture Handling of Apple transport techniques and efficiency vibration, damage and bruising texture, firmness and quality Bohdan Dobrzañski, jr. Jacek Rabcewicz Rafa³ Rybczyñski B. Dobrzañski Institute of Agrophysics Polish Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence AGROPHYSICS for Applied Physics in Sustainable Agriculture Handling of Apple transport techniques and efficiency vibration, damage and bruising texture, firmness and quality Bohdan Dobrzañski, jr. Jacek Rabcewicz Rafa³ Rybczyñski B. Dobrzañski Institute of Agrophysics Polish Academy of Sciences PUBLISHED BY: B. DOBRZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ACTIVITIES OF WP9 IN THE CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE AGROPHYSICS CONTRACT NO: QLAM-2001-00428 CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR APPLIED PHYSICS IN SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE WITH THE th ACRONYM AGROPHYSICS IS FOUNDED UNDER 5 EU FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ACTIVITIES GENERAL SUPERVISOR OF THE CENTRE: PROF. DR. RYSZARD T. WALCZAK, MEMBER OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES PROJECT COORDINATOR: DR. ENG. ANDRZEJ STĘPNIEWSKI WP9: PHYSICAL METHODS OF EVALUATION OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLE QUALITY LEADER OF WP9: PROF. DR. ENG. BOHDAN DOBRZAŃSKI, JR. REVIEWED BY PROF. DR. ENG. JÓZEF KOWALCZUK TRANSLATED (EXCEPT CHAPTERS: 1, 2, 6-9) BY M.SC. TOMASZ BYLICA THE RESULTS OF STUDY PRESENTED IN THE MONOGRAPH ARE SUPPORTED BY: THE STATE COMMITTEE FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH UNDER GRANT NO. 5 P06F 012 19 AND ORDERED PROJECT NO. PBZ-51-02 RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF POMOLOGY AND FLORICULTURE B. DOBRZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ©Copyright by BOHDAN DOBRZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES LUBLIN 2006 ISBN 83-89969-55-6 ST 1 EDITION - ISBN 83-89969-55-6 (IN ENGLISH) 180 COPIES, PRINTED SHEETS (16.8) PRINTED ON ACID-FREE PAPER IN POLAND BY: ALF-GRAF, UL.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazoria County Master Gardener Association 2013 Citrus and Fruit Guide
    BRAZORIA COUNTY MASTER GARDENER ASSOCIATION 2013 CITRUS AND FRUIT GUIDE A Guide to Proper Selection and Planting Tips for Brazoria County Gardeners B.E.E.S—Brazoria Environmental Education Station B- Be aware of the environment E- Endeavor to protect our natural resources E- Educate our community S- Serve as stewards of the Earth FOREWORD The Brazoria County Master Gardener (BCMG) program is part of the state organization affiliated with the Texas A & M Extension System. We are a 501C3 organization under IRS statutes. Monies collected from this sale supports the B.E.E.S. educational and demonstration gardens located at the end of CR 171. One of this years’ major projects is to build walkways which meet handicap standards and for our senior citizens. The gardens are open on Tuesdays and Fri- days to the public. Special topic programs are offered on Saturdays for public attendance and are advertised in local newspapers and radio. The gardens include eating fruits (berries, fruit, etc.), herb garden, tropicals, veggies, rose garden, two greenhouses other demo/experimental plants. The contents of this brochure utilized multiple resources from leading agricultural universities, Texas and other state and national organizations. Fruit plants are selected on basis of Master Gardener feedback in our county as well as neighbor counties. Past demand & interviews of folks after each years’ February sale help us select new varieties and determine plant volume each year at the sale. BCMG makes genuine efforts to provide the public with information on plants offered. Other than assuring the public that we use only licensed nurseries, BCMG cannot assure success.
    [Show full text]