DOCSLIB.ORG

Accord Sur Les Revendications Territoriales Du Nunavut

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Accord Sur Les Revendications Territoriales Du Nunavut ACCORD ENTRE LES INUIT DE LA RÉGION DU NUNAVUT ET SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE DU CHEF DU CANADA TABLE DES MATIÈRES CHAPITRE 1 : DÉFINITIONS PARTIE PAGE PARTIE 1 Dispositions générales ........................................ 3 CHAPITRE 2 : DISPOSITIONS GÉNÉRALES PARTIE 1 Principes et objectifs ......................................... 13 PARTIE 2 Accord sur des revendications territoriales ........................ 13 PARTIE 3 Plein Effet ................................................. 13 PARTIE 4 Ratification ................................................ 13 PARTIE 5 Entrée en vigueur ........................................... 13 PARTIE 6 Engagements relatifs aux mesures législatives futures ............... 13 PARTIE 7 Précisions ................................................. 13 PARTIE 8 Langues de l'Accord ......................................... 14 PARTIE 9 Interprétation ............................................... 14 PARTIE 10 Pouvoirs gouvernementaux .................................... 15 PARTIE 11 Invalidité .................................................. 15 PARTIE 12 Règles de droit applicables .................................... 16 PARTIE 13 Modification de l'Accord ..................................... 16 PARTIE 14 Poursuites au nom des Inuit ................................... 16 PARTIE 15 Indemnisation .............................................. 16 PARTIE 16 Communication de renseignements ............................. 18 PARTIE 17 Terres inuit ................................................ 18 CHAPITRE 3 : RÉGION DU NUNAVUT PARTIE 1 Description ................................................ 19 PARTIE 2 Zone A .................................................... 19 PARTIE 3 Zone B .................................................... 21 PARTIE 4 Carte ..................................................... 22 PARTIE 5 Précision .................................................. 23 ANNEXE 3-1 Carte de la région du Nunavut ................................. 24 CHAPITRE 4 : ÉVOLUTION POLITIQUE DU NUNAVUT PARTIE 1 Dispositions générales ....................................... 25 )))))))))))))))))) i )))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) PARTIE PAGE CHAPITRE 5 : RESSOURCES FAUNIQUES PARTIE 1 Dispositions générales ....................................... 27 PARTIE 2 Création du conseil de gestion des ressources faunique du Nunavut ................................................... 30 PARTIE 3 Décisions .................................................. 37 PARTIE 4 Étude sur la récolte des ressources fauniques dans le Nunavut ........ 40 PARTIE 5 Étude des connaissances des Inuit sur les baleines boréales .......... 41 PARTIE 6 Récolte ................................................... 41 PARTIE 7 Caractéristiques particulières des activités de récolte Inuit ........... 49 PARTIE 8 Droit de premier refus et droit d'utiliser les terres du Gouvernement .............................................. 56 PARTIE 9 Ententes internationales et ententes intergouvernementales intérieures ................................................. 58 ANNEXES 5-1 Gros gibier ................................................ 60 5-2 Animaux à fourrure .......................................... 60 5-3 Oiseaux migrateurs .......................................... 61 5-4 Serment professionnel des membres du Conseil de gestion des ressources fauniques du Nunavut ............................... 62 5-5 Cadre de l'étude sur la récolte des ressources fauniques dans le Nunavut ................................................. 62 5-6 Droit de premier refus à l'égard des camps de sportifs et de naturalistes ................................................ 63 CHAPITRE 6 : INDEMNITÉS RELATIVES AUX RESSOURCES FAUNIQUES PARTIE 1 Définitions et interprétation ................................... 65 PARTIE 2 Application ................................................ 65 PARTIE 3 Principe général de la responsabilité ............................ 66 PARTIE 4 Procédure de présentation des demandes d'indemnisation ............ 67 PARTIE 5 Autres questions ............................................ 68 PARTIE 6 Réserves .................................................. 68 CHAPITRE 7 : CAMPS ÉLOIGNÉS PARTIE 1 Définition et interprétation .................................... 71 PARTIE 2 Camps éloignés situés sur des terres de la Couronne ................ 71 PARTIE 3 Tenure des camps éloignés .................................... 72 PARTIE 4 Terres mises à la disposition des Inuit par le Gouvernement .......... 72 PARTIE 5 Droits généraux ............................................. 72 )))))))))))))))))) ii )))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) PARTIE PAGE PARTIE 6 Autres questions ............................................ 73 CHAPITRE 8 : PARCS PARTIE 1 Définitions ................................................. 75 PARTIE 2 Parcs nationaux ............................................. 75 PARTIE 3 Parcs territoriaux ............................................ 77 PARTIE 4 Dispositions générales applicables à la fois aux parcs nationaux et aux parc territoriaux ....................................... 79 ANNEXES 8-1 Parc national d'Auyuittuq ..................................... 82 8-2 Parc national - Île d'Ellesmere ................................. 82 8-3 Questions touchant les parcs dont il convient de tenir compte dans les ententes sur les répercussions et les avantages pour les Inuit ....... 82 CHAPITRE 9 : AIRES DE CONSERVATION PARTIE 1 Définition ................................................. 85 PARTIE 2 Dispositions générales ....................................... 86 PARTIE 3 Conservation et gestion ....................................... 86 PARTIE 4 Entente sur les répercussions et les avantages pour les Inuit et autres questions ............................................. 87 PARTIE 5 Refuge de gibier de Thelon .................................... 87 PARTIE 6 Application ................................................ 88 ANNEXES 9-1 Aires de conservation existantes ................................ 89 9-2 Parcelles de terres inuit situées dans les aires de conservation existantes .................................................. 90 9-3 Parcelles de terres Inuit susceptibles d'être situées dans des aires de conservation dans le futur .............................. 90 CHAPITRE 10 : INSTITUTIONS DE GESTION DES TERRES ET DES RESSOURCES PARTIE 1 Délais .................................................... 93 PARTIE 2 Modalités de mise en oeuvre .................................. 93 PARTIE 3 Obligations supplémentaires ................................... 93 PARTIE 4 Coordination avec les institutions des régions adjacentes ............ 94 PARTIE 5 Communication de renseignements ............................. 94 PARTIE 6 Regroupement et réassignation des fonctions ...................... 94 )))))))))))))))))) iii )))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) PARTIE PAGE PARTIE 7 Modification de certains aspects administratifs .................... 95 PARTIE 8 Consultation ............................................... 96 PARTIE 9 Aide pécuniaire aux intervenants ............................... 96 PARTIE 10 Retard à légiférer ............................................ 96 CHAPITRE 11 : AMÉNAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE PARTIE 1 Application ................................................ 99 PARTIE 2 Principes, politiques, priorités et objectifs en matière d'aménagement ............................................. 99 PARTIE 3 Plans d'aménagement du territoire ............................. 101 PARTIE 4 Commission d'aménagement du Nunavut (CAN) ................. 101 PARTIE 5 Élaboration et examen des plans d'aménagement du territoire ........ 105 PARTIE 6 Modification et examen périodique des plans d'aménagement du territoire ................................................. 106 PARTIE 7 Municipalités ............................................. 107 PARTIE 8 Interprétation .............................................. 107 PARTIE 9 Nettoyage des dépôts de déchets ............................... 107 CHAPITRE 12 : RÉPERCUSSIONS DES ACTIVITÉS DE DÉVELOPPEMENT PARTIE 1 Définitions ................................................ 109 PARTIE 2 Commission du Nunavut chargée de l'examen des répercussions (CNER) .................................................. 109 PARTIE 3 Rapports avec les dispositions touchant l'aménagement du territoire ................................................. 114 PARTIE 4 Examen préalable des projets ................................. 114 PARTIE 5 Examen des projets par la CNER .............................. 117 PARTIE 6 Examen par une commission fédérale d'évaluation environnementale .......................................... 120 PARTIE 7 Surveillance ............................................... 124 PARTIE 8 Souplesse en ce qui concerne les certificats ...................... 125 PARTIE 9 Mise en oeuvre ............................................ 126 PARTIE 10 Exécution ................................................ 127 PARTIE 11 Répercussions transfrontalières ............................... 129 PARTIE 12 Application ............................................... 129 ANNEXE 12-1 Types de projets exemptés de l'examen préalable ................. 131 CHAPITRE 13 : GESTION DES EAUX )))))))))))))))))) iv )))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) PARTIE PAGE PARTIE 1 Définitions ................................................ 133 PARTIE 2 Constitution de l'office
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Atlantic Walrus Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 65 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous reports: COSEWIC 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 23 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Richard, P. 1987. COSEWIC status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-23 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge D.B. Stewart for writing the status report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Andrew Trites, Co-chair, COSEWIC Marine Mammals Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation du morse de l'Atlantique (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) au Canada – Mise à jour.
    [Show full text]
  • Tukitaaqtuq Explain to One Another, Reach Understanding, Receive Explanation from the Past and the Eskimo Identification Canada System
    Tukitaaqtuq explain to one another, reach understanding, receive explanation from the past and The Eskimo Identification Canada System by Norma Jean Mary Dunning A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Faculty of Native Studies University of Alberta ©Norma Jean Mary Dunning, 2014 ABSTRACT The government of Canada initiated, implemented, and officially maintained the ‘Eskimo Identification Canada’ system from 1941-1971. With the exception of the Labrador Inuit, who formed the Labrador Treaty of 1765 in what is now called, NunatuKavat, all other Canadian Inuit peoples were issued a leather-like necklace with a numbered fibre-cloth disk. These stringed identifiers attempted to replace Inuit names, tradition, individuality, and indigenous distinctiveness. This was the Canadian governments’ attempt to exert a form of state surveillance and its official authority, over its own Inuit citizenry. The Eskimo Identification Canada system, E- number, or disk system eventually became entrenched within Inuit society, and in time it became a form of identification amongst the Inuit themselves. What has never been examined by an Inuk researcher, or student is the long-lasting affect these numbered disks had upon the Inuit, and the continued impact into present-day, of this type of state-operated system. The Inuit voice has not been heard or examined. This research focuses exclusively on the disk system itself and brings forward the voices of four disk system survivors, giving voice to those who have been silenced for far too long. i PREFACE This thesis is an original work by Norma Dunning. The research project, of which this thesis is a part, received research ethics approval from the University of Alberta Research Ethics Board, Project Name: “Tukitaaqtuq (they reach understanding) and the Eskimo Identification Canada system,” PRO00039401, 05/07/2013.
    [Show full text]
  • NTI IIBA for Conservation Areas Cultural Heritage and Interpretative
    NTI IIBA for Phase I: Cultural Heritage Resources Conservation Areas Report Cultural Heritage Area: McConnell River and Interpretative Migratory Bird Sanctuary Materials Study Prepared for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. 1 May 2011 This Cultural Heritage Report: McConnell River Migratory Bird Sanctuary (Arviat) is part of a set of studies and a database produced for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. as part of the project: NTI IIBA for Conservation Areas, Cultural Resources Inventory and Interpretative Materials Study Inquiries concerning this project and the report should be addressed to: David Kunuk Director of Implementation Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. 3rd Floor, Igluvut Bldg. P.O. Box 638 Iqaluit, Nunavut X0A 0H0 E: [email protected] T: (867) 975‐4900 Project Manager, Consulting Team: Julie Harris Contentworks Inc. 137 Second Avenue, Suite 1 Ottawa, ON K1S 2H4 Tel: (613) 730‐4059 Email: [email protected] Cultural Heritage Report: McConnell River Migratory Bird Sanctuary (Arviat) Authors: Philip Goldring, Consultant: Historian and Heritage/Place Names Specialist (primary author) Julie Harris, Contentworks Inc.: Heritage Specialist and Historian Nicole Brandon, Consultant: Archaeologist Luke Suluk, Consultant: Inuit Cultural Specialist/Archaeologist Frances Okatsiak, Consultant: Collections Researcher Note on Place Names: The current official names of places are used here except in direct quotations from historical documents. Throughout the document Arviat refers to the settlement established in the 1950s and previously known as Eskimo Point. Names of
    [Show full text]
  • Connections to the Land: the Politics of Health and Wellbeing in Arviat, Nunavut Is About Traditional Knowledge As Process
    Connections to the Land: The Politics of Health and Wellbeing in Arviat Nunavut by Sherrie Lee Blakney A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Natural Resources Institute University of Manitoba December 2009 Copyright © 2009 by Sherrie Blakney THE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES ***** COPYRIGHT PERMISSION Connections to the Land: The Politics of Health and Wellbeing in Arviat Nunavut by Sherrie Lee Blakney A Thesis/Practicum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © 2009 Permission has been granted to the Library of the University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and to University Microfilms Inc. to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. This reproduction or copy of this thesis has been made available by authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied as permitted by copyright laws or with express written authorization from the copyright owner. Abstract Connections to the Land: the Politics of Health and Wellbeing in Arviat, Nunavut is about traditional knowledge as process. The thesis examines the relationships between Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (IQ) [“the Inuit way of doing things”; traditional knowledge (TK);], Inuit perceptions of health and wellbeing and the land; and what the relationships mean for integrated coastal and ocean management.
    [Show full text]
  • Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Central and Arctic Region Approved Pre-Publication Science Response 2018/055 MITIGATION BUFFER ZONES FOR ATLANTIC WALRUS (ODOBENUS ROSMARUS ROSMARUS) IN THE NUNAVUT SETTLEMENT AREA Context The Nunavut Planning Commission (NPC) is responsible for developing, implementing and monitoring land use plans to guide and direct resource use and development in the Nunavut Settlement Area (NSA). The NPC, with input from government, Inuit organizations and other stakeholders, has been developing a Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan (Plan) that, when finalized, will apply to the entire NSA, with the exception of National Marine Conservation Areas and some parks and historic sites. The Plan will be the entry point for impact assessments and regulatory approval processes for proposed projects, both of industry and government. In accordance with the Nunavut Agreement, any vessel or aerial setbacks that may be included in an approved Plan would not restrict the Inuit right to subsistence land use or harvest of wildlife. To date, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) has provided the NPC with some information on Atlantic walrus presence and sensitive walrus habitat in the NSA and Outer Land Fast Ice Zone. DFO has not provided information that might guide measures to avoid and/or mitigate disturbance of walrus and their important habitat from project activities, including shipping. Such information would inform land use planning designations and conditions of use for those areas and/or other mitigation measures outside of the land use plan. As a first step to providing this information, the Policy and Economics Branch, which leads departmental input into the draft Plan, has requested science advice to identify important walrus habitat and areas of aggregation in the NSA, including the Outer Land Fast Ice Zone; provide information about acceptable noise levels to walrus at haul-out sites and identify mitigation measures, including buffer zone recommendations, to minimize disturbance of walrus from ships, small watercraft and aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem
    11–1 11.0 HUMAN OCCUPATION Chapter Contents 11.1 PREHISTORY (2000 BC - 1610 AD) ....................................................................................................................11–1 11.1.1 Pre Dorset Culture (2000 - 800 BC)..............................................................................................................11–2 11.1.2 Dorset Culture (800 BC - 1500 AD) ..............................................................................................................11–2 11.1.3 Thule Culture (1000 - 1600 AD)....................................................................................................................11–3 11.1.4 Inuit Culture (1600 - present) ........................................................................................................................11–4 11.1.5 Indian Cultures ..............................................................................................................................................11–5 11.2 HISTORY (1610 - 2004 AD)..................................................................................................................................11–6 11.2.1 Early Exploration and Mapping (1610 -1632) ...............................................................................................11–8 11.2.2 Struggle for Control of the Bay (1668-1713) .................................................................................................11–8 11.2.3 Development by the Hudson's Bay Company and Whaling (1714-1903)...................................................11–12
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Bear As Special Concern Under the Species at Risk Act
    Nunavut Consultation Report Consultations on the Proposed Listing of the Polar Bear as Special Concern under the Species at Risk Act Conducted February—April 2009 by the Canadian Wildlife Service Submitted to the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board in accordance with Step 3.8 of the Memorandum of Understanding to Harmonize the Designation of Endangered Species under the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement and the Species at Risk Act Prepared by: Canadian Wildlife Service Iqaluit, Nunavut August 2009 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................2 2. Consultation Procedures ..........................................................................................3 Pre-consultation........................................................................................................3 During consultation...................................................................................................3 Post-consultation ......................................................................................................4 3. Consultation Dates and Attendance.........................................................................5 4. Summary of Feedback .............................................................................................7 A. Written responses received..................................................................................7 B. Main Comments and Concerns............................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of the POLAR BEAR REPORT 2019 Susan J
    asdf STATE OF THE POLAR BEAR REPORT 2019 Susan J. Crockford The Global Warming Policy Foundation Report 39 The State of the Polar Bear 2019 Susan J. Crockford Cite as: Crockford SJ (2020) The State of the Polar Bear 2019. Report 39, The Global Warming Policy Foundation. ISBN 978-1-9160700-6-6 © Copyright 2020, The Global Warming Policy Foundation ii Contents Foreword v About the author v Executive summary vii 1. Introduction 1 2. Conservation status 2 3. Population size 2 4. Population trends 12 5. Habitat status 15 6. Prey base 20 7. Health and survival 23 8. Evidence of flexibility 28 9. Human/bear interactions 30 10. Discussion 40 References 43 Notes 67 About the Global Warming Policy Foundation 80 iii iv Foreword From 1972 until 2010,1 The Polar Bear Specialist Group (PBSG) of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) published comprehensive status reports every four years or so, as proceedings of their official meet- ings, making them available in electronic format. Until 2018 – a full eight years after its last report – the PBSG had disseminated information only on its website, updated (without announcement) at its discretion. In April 2018, the PBSG finally produced a standalone proceedings docu- ment from its 2016 meeting,2 although most people would have been unaware that this document existed unless they visited the PBSG website. This State of the Polar Bear Report is intended to pro- vide a yearly update of the kind of content available in those occasional PBSG meeting reports, albeit with more critical commentary regarding some of the inconsistencies and sources of bias present in the corpus of reports and papers.
    [Show full text]
  • 222-10-01 IQ Implementation on the WHB Polar Bear: Arviat
    Project Number: 222-10-01 IQ Implementation on the WHB Polar Bear: Arviat Arviat Hunters and Trappers Organization Contact: Alex Ishalook, Chairperson of Arviat HTO P.O Box 529 Arviat, Nunavut X0C 0E0 Phone: (867) 857-2636 Fax: (867) 857-2488 Email: [email protected] Summary: Arviat HTO hired an interviewer to collect Inuit Traditional Knowledge from hunters and elders of Arviat, Nunavut. A transcriber was also hired to document the interviews in English and Inuktitut. A total of 21 elders/hunters were interviewed. Each person was asked to describe characteristics/behaviour of polar bears, migratory and denning locations, diet of polar bears, observations and any comments, concerns if any. Introduction: Arviat HTO wanted Inuit Qauyimayatuqangit implemented on the Western Hudson Bay polar bear in Arviat as Inuit knowledge should be part of studies conducted on wildlife species and environment. Project Objective: The objective of the project was to collect Inuit Qauyimayatuqangit in Arviat. Arviat is a high traffic area for polar bears as the community is on the coast of Western Hudson Bay. Arviat HTO wanted to collect knowledge from elders and hunters to have scientific knowledge and Inuit traditional knowledge combined. Material Financial Report Allocation Original Proposed budget Actual amounts spent Audio/Visuals $2545.55 $1843.75 Human Resources $6000.00 $10150.00 (Interviewer/Transcriber Interviews $8000.00 $2100.00 Mapping Interviews $8000.00 $1600.00 Travel $3054.45 6342.00 Accommodations (3054.45) 1633.40 Per-Diem for 2 x 5 days 1026.00 TOTAL $27600.00 $24,695.15 Difference 2804.85 MAPPING Locations Each interviewee was asked if they can talk about the locations known for denning and migration of polar bears.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Conservation Briefs
    CANADIAN REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES WRITING STATEMENTS OF SIGNIFICANCE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents 1 General Guidelines 2 Introduction 2 What is a Historic Place? 3 Understanding the Statement of Significance 3 Preparing to Write a Statement of Significance for the Canadian Register of Historic Places 4 Checklist for preparing Statements of Significance 7 Writing a Statement of Significance for the Canadian Register of Historic Places 8 General guidelines for writing a Statement of Significance 8 Description of Historic Place 8 Heritage Value 10 Example of Historic Place with historical value: 11 Character-defining elements 13 Completing the Statement of Significance 16 Guidelines for Heritage Districts 35 Introduction 35 Understanding Heritage Districts 36 Writing SOSs for the CRHP for Heritage Districts 38 Character-Defining Elements for Heritage Districts 41 Guidelines for Archaeological Sites and Places with an Archaeological Component 58 Introduction 58 Understanding Archaeology 58 Writing a SOS for the CRHP for Archaeology 61 Character-Defining Elements for Archaeology 64 1 GENERAL GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION Canadian Register of Historic Places The Canadian Register of Historic Places (CRHP) is a federal, provincial and territorial collaboration designed to conserve historic places in Canada and to foster a culture of conservation across the country. The CRHP is a national, searchable, online database of historic places formally recognized by federal, provincial, territorial and local governments. Since the official launch of the CRHP in May 2004, federal, provincial and territorial registrars have been nominating formally recognized historic places from their respective jurisdictions to the CRHP. A key element in the required documentation for listing on the CRHP is a Statement of Significance (SOS).
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan
    CCG Canadian Coast Guard DFO Fisheries and Oceans Canada DND Department of National Defence DNLUP Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan IIBA Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement IMO International Maritime Organization INAC Indigenous & Northern Affairs Canada IPG Institution of Public Government (NIRB, NPC, NWB, NSRT, NWMB) IQ Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit LIC Linear Infrastructure Corridor NEB National Energy Board NIRB Nunavut Impact Review Board NLCA Nunavut Land Claims Agreement NLUP Nunavut Land Use Plan NPC Nunavut Planning Commission NSA Nunavut Settlement Area NTI Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated NUPPAA Nunavut Planning and Project Assessment Act NWB Nunavut Water Board NWMB Nunavut Wildlife Management Board SARA Species at Risk Act SDL Significant Discovery Licence SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment VEC Valued Ecosystem Component VSEC Valued Socio-Economic Component Definitions: General In the case of inconsistencies between these definitions and those found in the Nunavut Land Claim Agreement (NLCA) or the Nunavut Planning & Project Assessment Act (NUPPAA), the definitions in those documents shall prevail. In the NLUP: Advanced Exploration is the phase after Exploration and prior Conservation Area means any Conservation Area in existence to Mining where intensive work is done to a staked area. This at the date of ratification of the NLCA, and, any of the includes but not limited to: bulk sampling; stripping and following areas established under the legislation of NUPPAA: trenching land; removing shallow overburden; use of (a) A wildlife area established under the Canada Wildlife Act; explosives; and drilling. A proponent may or may not require (b) A critical habitat, wildlife sanctuary or special a Type A land use permit pursuant to Section 25 of the management area, as defined in Section 2 of the Wildlife Act, Territorial Land Use Regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem
    9–1 9.0 MAMMALS Chapter Contents 9.1 BELUGA Delphinapterus leucas (Pallas, 1776)......................................................................................................9–2 9.1.1 Distribution and Movements............................................................................................................................9–3 9.1.2 Biology ............................................................................................................................................................9–6 9.1.3 Population Status and Protection....................................................................................................................9–7 9.2 NARWHAL Monodon monoceros Linnaeus, 1758..................................................................................................9–9 9.2.1 Distribution and Movements..........................................................................................................................9–10 9.2.2 Biology ..........................................................................................................................................................9–11 9.2.3 Population Status and Protection..................................................................................................................9–12 9.3 KILLER WHALE Orcinus orca (Linnaeus, 1758)...................................................................................................9–13 9.4 BOWHEAD WHALE Balaena mysticetus Linnaeus, 1758 ...................................................................................9–14
    [Show full text]