DOCSLIB.ORG

Polar Bear As Special Concern Under the Species at Risk Act

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Polar Bear As Special Concern Under the Species at Risk Act Nunavut Consultation Report Consultations on the Proposed Listing of the Polar Bear as Special Concern under the Species at Risk Act Conducted February—April 2009 by the Canadian Wildlife Service Submitted to the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board in accordance with Step 3.8 of the Memorandum of Understanding to Harmonize the Designation of Endangered Species under the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement and the Species at Risk Act Prepared by: Canadian Wildlife Service Iqaluit, Nunavut August 2009 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................2 2. Consultation Procedures ..........................................................................................3 Pre-consultation........................................................................................................3 During consultation...................................................................................................3 Post-consultation ......................................................................................................4 3. Consultation Dates and Attendance.........................................................................5 4. Summary of Feedback .............................................................................................7 A. Written responses received..................................................................................7 B. Main Comments and Concerns............................................................................8 Distribution of main comments and concerns by community ..............................12 C. Other comments and concerns ..........................................................................14 Distribution of other comments and concerns by community ..............................19 D. Short Meeting Summaries..................................................................................22 Pangnirtung.........................................................................................................22 Qikiqtarjuaq.........................................................................................................22 Clyde River .........................................................................................................22 Pond Inlet............................................................................................................22 Arctic Bay............................................................................................................23 Resolute Bay.......................................................................................................23 Grise Fiord ..........................................................................................................23 Cape Dorset........................................................................................................23 Hall Beach...........................................................................................................24 Igloolik.................................................................................................................24 Sanikiluaq ...........................................................................................................24 Iqaluit ..................................................................................................................25 Kimmirut..............................................................................................................25 Kugluktuk ............................................................................................................25 Cambridge Bay ...................................................................................................26 Taloyoak .............................................................................................................26 Kugaaruk.............................................................................................................26 Gjoa Haven .........................................................................................................26 Rankin Inlet .........................................................................................................27 Arviat...................................................................................................................27 Whale Cove ........................................................................................................27 Coral Harbour......................................................................................................28 Repulse Bay........................................................................................................28 Chesterfield Inlet .................................................................................................28 Appendices ................................................................................................................30 Appendix A. Consultation Materials........................................................................30 Appendix B. Full Meeting Summaries.....................................................................60 Appendix C. HTO Response Forms and Letters Received...................................187 Appendix D. Public Response Forms and Letters Received ................................215 Appendix E. Organizations- Letters Received ......................................................245 Appendix F. Schedule of consultations in other regions .......................................247 Nunavut Consultation Report: Polar Bear Proposed SARA Listing 1 1. Introduction The polar bear was assessed as a species of Special Concern by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) in April 2008. Under the Species at Risk Act (SARA), the Minister of the Environment must consult relevant provinces and territories as well as relevant wildlife management boards before making a legal listing recommendation to the Governor in Council on whether to accept the assessment of the status of a species by COSEWIC. Under the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement (NLCA), government seeks community input before bringing issues to the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board (NWMB) for decision. The process for SARA listing consultations in Nunavut is detailed in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the federal government and the NWMB which harmonizes the listing process under SARA with the NLCA. The SARA-NLCA Harmonization MOU outlines a process in which the federal government conducts public consultations with affected communities before seeking NWMB approval for species listings. Environment Canada held consultations on the proposed listing of the polar bear in Nunavut from February to April 2009. This report summarizes the results of the Nunavut consultations and is being submitted to the NWMB in correspondence with Step 3.8 of the SARA-NLCA Harmonization MOU. The results of Nunavut consultations are also for consideration by the federal Minister of the Environment. Consultation is also occurring in other provinces and territories and with other wildlife management boards that have jurisdiction or that share responsibility for the management of polar bear populations. Summaries of consultations in other regions are not yet available. Refer to Appendix F for the schedule of consultations in other regions. Nunavut Consultation Report: Polar Bear Proposed SARA Listing 2 2. Consultation Procedures Pre-consultation In December 2008, Environment Canada briefed the NWMB on the proposed listing and asked for recommendations on the proposed consultation approach. It was decided that Environment Canada would consult every Nunavut community on the proposed listing through in-person meetings. Each community was sent a consultation package (Appendix A) with information on the proposed listing, including narrated presentations, and invited to indicate whether or not they wished to have an in-person meeting. A copy of the consultation package was provided to the NWMB in January 2009 before consultations began and was reviewed by NWMB staff. The materials were also provided to the Government of Nunavut (GN), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated (NTI), and the Chair of COSEWIC and the Chair of the COSEWIC Mammals Subcommittee with opportunity for review. NTI and Regional Wildlife Organizations accepted the invitation to participate in the consultations. The GN declined the invitation to participate in the consultations; however, local GN Conservation Officers were invited to meetings in each community. The Hunters and Trappers Organizations (HTOs) in each community, through a contract, provided logistical support to Environment Canada, including help to ensure that meetings were well-advertised and that materials could be shared with, and collected from, the public after the meetings took place. During consultation In each community, meetings were held with the HTO Directors and then with the public. HTOs are elected bodies established under Article 5 of the NLCA that manage wildlife at the community level. The consultation team was comprised of an Environment Canada biologist who led the presentations and responded to questions, another EC staff to manage the administration, logistics and recording (audio and written), a contract interpreter, a second local interpreter in some cases, and in most cases the representative(s) from NTI and/or the Regional Wildlife Organization. Environment Canada made two presentations at each in-person meeting. The first was
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NSF/UNOLS Arctic Icebreaker Coordinating Committee (AICC) Meeting June 22, 2020
    NSF/UNOLS Arctic Icebreaker Coordinating Committee (AICC) Meeting June 22, 2020 Canadian NW Passage: Research Outreach Background & Recommendations Phil McGillivary, USCG PACAREA & Icebreaker Science Liaison email: [email protected] Outline: • Principal Towns & Research Centers in Inuit Nunangat • Research Coordination with Inuit, Nunavut: Recommendations, POCs, and prior CG outreach • Downlink locations planned by Quintillion for fiber optic/Internet along NWP • Marine Protected areas along Canadian NW Passage Distribution of Communities & Research Stations along NWP Grise Fjord Sachs Harbor Resolute Pond Inlet Tuktoyaktuk Arctic Bay Clyde River Holman Paulatuk Igloolik Cambridge Bay Gjoa Haven Iqaluit Research Coordination: Canadian National Recommendations • Consult the Canadian National Inuit Strategy on Research (Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami): https://www.itk.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/National-Inuit-Strategy-on-Research.pdf • This outlines the different regions for research licenses, which may have different regulations/requirements. The regions are: • Inuvialuit Settlement Region (ISR): the westernmost area, with licenses granted by the Aurora Research Institute (ARI) • Nunavut, central area, with licenses granted by the Nunavut Research Institute (NRI) • Nunavik, easternmost area, with licenses granted by the Nunavik Research Centre (or others depending on type of research, eg human health is another group • Appendix A in this document includes a list of all Research Stations in these areas (shown in previous slide •
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Nunavut, Canada
    english cover 11/14/01 1:13 PM Page 1 FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove Principal Researchers: Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove PO Box 1379 Principal Researchers: Iqaluit, Nunavut Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and X0A 0H0 Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike Cover photo: Glenn Williams/Ursus Illustration on cover, inside of cover, title page, dedication page, and used as a report motif: “Arvanniaqtut (Whale Hunters)”, sc 1986, Simeonie Kopapik, Cape Dorset Print Collection. ©Nunavut Wildlife Management Board March, 2000 Table of Contents I LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . .i II DEDICATION . .ii III ABSTRACT . .iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY . .1 1.2 TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE . .1 2 METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN . .3 2.2 THE STUDY AREA . .4 2.3 INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES AND THE QUESTIONNAIRE . .4 2.4 METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS .
    [Show full text]
  • Kivia Covid 19 Response Initiative Phase 2
    KivIA Covid 19 Response Initiative Phase 2 December 8, 2020 By KIA Announcements / Inuit Programs & Services RANKIN INLET, NU – December 7, 2020 – The Kivalliq Inuit Association (KivIA) is pleased to announce the launch of the second phase of its COVID-19 initiatives for its members. Initiatives that included support for its Elders, traditional activities, and support to all its members within our communities had ended. The additional funds for KivIA’s second phase COVID-19 response plan come from additional funding from the Indigenous Community Support Fund (ICSF). The KivIA had carefully considered various options to roll out this additional funding from the federal government. The discussion led to a consensus on a plan that would… Eliminate the need to have the program become application based Allow the general public, KIA staff and Inuit to not come in contact with each other in order to carry out this program, therefore following the Public Health Measures currently in effect. Allow the Inuit in the Kivalliq communities to quickly receive the relief funds without any delay due to administrative time. Benefit local Inuit owned companies with their services Maximize the funding effectiveness with the addition of added funds from the vendor and ability for its members to add on to their dividends. Prevent any tax implications for the Inuit from the federal government in receiving this relief funding. With the above factors put into consideration, it was suggested by the Covid-19 Planning Committee that the ICS Funding would be rolled out with a partnership with the Arctic Cooperatives Limited to provide $1500 gift cards to every Inuit household in the Kivalliq Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release Neas Awarded New Exclusive Carrier Contracts for Nunavut
    PRESS RELEASE NEAS AWARDED NEW EXCLUSIVE CARRIER CONTRACTS FOR NUNAVUT - New for 2019: NEAS is now the Government of Nunavut’s (GN) dedicated carrier for Iqaluit, Cape Dorset, Kimmirut, Pangnirtung, Arctic Bay, Qikiqtarjuaq, Clyde River, Grise Fiord, Pond Inlet, Resolute Bay, Baker Lake, Chesterfield Inlet, Rankin Inlet, Whale Cove, Arviat, Coral Harbour, Kugaaruk, Sanikiluaq, and the Churchill, MB, to Kivalliq service. - Another arctic sealift first for 2019: Kugaaruk customers can now reserve direct with NEAS for the Valleyfield to Kugaaruk service, with no need to reserve through the GN; - “The team at NEAS is thankful for the Government of Nunavut’s vote of confidence in our reliable arctic sealift operations,” said Suzanne Paquin, President and CEO, NEAS Group. “We look forward to delivering our customer service excellence and a better overall customer sealift experience for all peoples, communities, government departments and agencies, stores, construction projects, mines, defence contractors and businesses across Canada’s Eastern and Western Arctic.” IQALUIT, NU, April 25, 2019 – The 2019 Arctic sealift season is underway, and the team of dedicated professionals at the NEAS Group is ready to help you enjoy the most reliable sealift services available across Canada’s Eastern and Western Arctic. New this season, NEAS is pleased to have been awarded the exclusive carrier contracts for the Government of Nunavut including Iqaluit and now Cape Dorset, Kimmirut, Pangnirtung, Arctic Bay, Qikiqtarjuaq, Clyde River, Grise Fiord, Pond Inlet, Resolute Bay, Baker Lake, Chesterfield Inlet, Rankin Inlet, Whale Cove, Arviat, Coral Harbour, Kugaaruk, Sanikiluaq, and the Churchill, MB, to Kivalliq service. No matter where you are across the Canadian Arctic, the NEAS team of dedicated employees and our modern fleet of Inuit-owned Canadian flag vessels is ready to deliver a superior sealift experience for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait the Following Marine Mammals Are Common to Hudson Strait, However, Other Species May Also Be Seen
    Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait The following marine mammals are common to Hudson Strait, however, other species may also be seen. It’s possible for marine mammals to venture outside of their common habitats and may be seen elsewhere. Bowhead Whale Length: 13-19 m Appearance: Stocky, with large head. Blue-black body with white markings on the chin, belly and just forward of the tail. No dorsal fin or ridge. Two blow holes, no teeth, has baleen. Behaviour: Blow is V-shaped and bushy, reaching 6 m in height. Often alone but sometimes in groups of 2-10. Habitat: Leads and cracks in pack ice during winter and in open water during summer. Status: Special concern Beluga Whale Length: 4-5 m Appearance: Adults are almost entirely white with a tough dorsal ridge and no dorsal fin. Young are grey. Behaviour: Blow is low and hardly visible. Not much of the body is visible out of the water. Found in small groups, but sometimes hundreds to thousands during annual migrations. Habitat: Found in open water year-round. Prefer shallow coastal water during summer and water near pack ice in winter. Killer Whale Status: Endangered Length: 8-9 m Appearance: Black body with white throat, belly and underside and white spot behind eye. Triangular dorsal fin in the middle of the back. Male dorsal fin can be up to 2 m in high. Behaviour: Blow is tall and column shaped; approximately 4 m in height. Narwhal Typically form groups of 2-25. Length: 4-5 m Habitat: Coastal water and open seas, often in water less than 200 m depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Passage Trail
    Nunavut Parks & Special Places – Editorial Series January, 2008 NorThwesT Passage Trail The small Nunavut community of Gjoa Haven Back in the late eighteenth and nineteenth is located on King William Island, right on the centuries, a huge effort was put forth by historic Northwest Passage and home to the Europeans to locate a passage across northern Northwest Passage Trail which meanders within North America to connect the European nations the community, all within easy walking distance with the riches of the Orient. From the east, many from the hotel. A series of signs, a printed guide, ships entered Hudson Bay and Lancaster Sound, and a display of artifacts in the hamlet office mapping the routes and seeking a way through interpret the local Inuit culture, exploration of the ice-choked waters and narrow channels to the the Northwest Passage, and the story of the Gjoa Pacific Ocean and straight sailing to the oriental and Roald Amundsen. It is quite an experience lands and profitable trading. The only other to walk the shores of history here, learning of routes were perilous – rounding Cape Horn at the exploration of the North, and the lives of the the southern tip of South America or the Cape of people who helped the explorers. Good Hope at the southern end of Africa. As a result, many expeditions were launched to seek a passage through the arctic archipelago. Aussi disponible en français xgw8Ns7uJ5 wk5tg5 Pilaaktut Inuinaqtut ᑲᔾᔮᓇᖅᑐᖅ k a t j a q n a a q listen to the land aliannaktuk en osmose avec la terre Through the efforts of the Royal Navy, and WANDER THROUGH HISTORY Lady Jane Franklin, John Franklin’s wife, At the Northwest Passage Trail in the at least 29 expeditions were launched to community of Gjoa Haven, visitors can, seek Franklin and his men, or evidence of through illustrations and text on interpretive their fate.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019/20 Qikiqtaaluk Corporation | Annual Report 2019/2020 Qikiqtaaluk Corporation | Annual Report 2019/2020
    ᕿᑭᖅᑖᓗᒃ ᑯᐊᐳᕆᓴᓐ ᓇᒻᒥᓂᕐᑯᑎᖕᒋᓪᓗ QIKIQTAALUK CORPORATION & Group of Companies Annual Report 2019/20 Qikiqtaaluk Corporation | Annual Report 2019/2020 Qikiqtaaluk Corporation | Annual Report 2019/2020 Chairman’s Message 1 President’s Message 2 Ludy Pudluk 3 About Qikiqtaaluk Corporation 4 Company Profile 4 Qikiqtani Region 5 Company Chart 6 Board of Directors 7 2019-2020 Highlights 8 PanArctic Communications 8 QC Fisheries Research Vessel 9 Inuit Employment and Capacity Building 10 Community Investment and Sponsorships 11 Scholarships 11 QIA Dividend 12 Community Investment Program 12 Event Sponsorship 13 Wholly Owned Subsidiary Activity Reports 15 Fisheries Division Activity Report 15 Qikiqtaaluk Fisheries Corporation 18 Qikiqtani Retail Services Limited 20 Qikiqtaaluk Business Development Corporation 22 Qikiqtaaluk Properties Inc. 24 Nunavut Nukkiksautiit Corporation 26 Qikiqtani Industry Ltd. 28 Aqsarniit Hotel and Conference Centre Inc. 31 Akiuq Corporation 33 Qikiqtaaluk Corporation Group of Companies 34 Other Wholly Owned Subsidiaries 34 Majority Owned Joint Ventures 34 Joint Venture Partnerships 35 Affiliations 36 Qikiqtaaluk Corporation | Annual Report 2019/2020 | Chairman’s Message Welcome to the 2019-2020 Qikiqtaaluk Corporation Annual Report. This past year was a time of focus and dedication to ensuring Qikiqtaaluk Corporation’s (QC) ongoing initiatives were progressed and delivered successfully. In overseeing the Corporation and its eleven wholly owned companies, we worked diligently to ensure every decision is in the best interest of Qikiqtani Inuit and promotes the growth of the Corporation. On behalf of the Board, we would like to share our sadness and express our condolences on the passing of longstanding QC Board member and friend, Ludy Pudluk. Ludy was a Director on QC’s Board for over two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracting & Procurement Activity Report
    CONTRACTING & PROCUREMENT ACTIVITY REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary Section A – Major Construction Contracts ..................................................................... 2 Summary Section B – Operations and Maintenance Expenditures ................................................ 3 Section A – Major Construction Contracts – Detailed List............................................................ 10 Section B – Operations and Maintenance Contracts – Detailed List ............................................ 11 Professional Services ..................................................................................................................... 12 Air Charters ................................................................................................................................... 14 Maintenance ................................................................................................................................. 15 Goods ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Leases - Public and Staff Housing 2019 - 2020 ............................................................................. 19 CONTRACTING REPORT: 2019-2020 OVERVIEW PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to support the integrity and transparency in Government Contracting
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Harmful and Toxic Creatures in the Goa of Jordan
    Published by the Royal Marine Conservation Society of Jordan. P. O. Box 831051, Abdel Aziz El Thaalbi St., Shmesani 11183. Amman Copyright: © The Royal Marine Conservation Society of Jordan Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non- commercial purposes is authorized without prior written approval from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. ISBN: 978-9957-8740-1-8 Deposit Number at the National Library: 2619/6/2016 Citation: Eid, E and Al Tawaha, M. (2016). A Guide to Harmful and Toxic Creature in the Gulf of Aqaba of Jordan. The Royal Marine Conservation Society of Jordan. ISBN: 978-9957-8740-1-8. Pp 84. Material was reviewed by Dr Nidal Al Oran, International Research Center for Water, Environment and Energy\ Al Balqa’ Applied University,and Dr. Omar Attum from Indiana University Southeast at the United State of America. Cover page: Vlad61; Shutterstock Library All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder, and it should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without permission. 1 Content Index of Creatures Described in this Guide ......................................................... 5 Preface ................................................................................................................ 6 Part One: Introduction ......................................................................................... 8 1.1 The Gulf of Aqaba; Jordan ......................................................................... 8 1.2 Aqaba;
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Walrus Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 65 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous reports: COSEWIC 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 23 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Richard, P. 1987. COSEWIC status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-23 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge D.B. Stewart for writing the status report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Andrew Trites, Co-chair, COSEWIC Marine Mammals Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation du morse de l'Atlantique (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) au Canada – Mise à jour.
    [Show full text]
  • Nunavut's Education
    Nunavut’s Education Act: Education, Legislation, and Change in the Arctic Heather E. McGregor Abstract: The 2008 Nunavut Education Act endeavours to call Nunavut’s public education system to account for linguistic, cultural, and local relevance to the majority Inuit population. Development of the Act involved lengthy scrutiny of existing and proposed education legislation to ensure consistency and compatibility with the new vision of education. Implementation of this Act is now necessitating system transformation on a substantial scale, on the part of educators, administrators, district education authorities, and territorial government officials. This article explores the historical roots of the 2008 Act. Renewal of the education system was made possible and necessary by the creation of Nunavut Territory in 1999, which grew out of the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement and negotiations for increased Inuit self-government. However, situating the Act in the history of Nunavut’s educational policy and decision making, it can be seen as a milestone in a longer change process aimed at creating schools that better reflect communities and the needs of northern students. Considering the inherent potential of education to reflect and sustain Inuit self-determination, linguistic protection, and cultural promotion, the intersection of education with politics through the Act was long in coming. Education is now seen to be one of the Nunavut government’s most important priorities. This is well worth recognizing in the history of education in Nunavut, and in Canada as well. The 2008 Nunavut Education Act (the Act) is the first provincial or territorial education legislation in Canada that represents the educational vision of an Indigenous population.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Fisheries Management Plan for Narwhal in the Nunavut Settlement Area
    Integrated Fisheries Management Plan for Narwhal in the Nunavut Settlement Area Hunter & Trapper Organizations Consultations March 2012 Discussion Topics • Why changes are needed to narwhal co-management • Overview of the draft Narwhal Management Plan • Marine Mammal Tag Transfer Policy Development • HTO & hunter roles and responsibilities under the revised management system Why do we need changes to the Narwhal Management System? Increased national and international interest in how the narwhal fishery in Nunavut is managed. Strengthen narwhal co-management consistent with; • NLCA wildlife harvesting and management provisions such as • Establishing Total Allowable Harvest (TAH), Basic Needs Level (BNL) • Increased roles for Regional Wildlife Organizations (RWOs) and Hunters and Trappers Organizations (HTOs) • Available scientific and Inuit knowledge • Sustainable harvesting • International trade requirements Why do we need changes to the Narwhal Management System? International Exports • Must conform to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) • Canadian CITES Export Permits require a Non-Detriment Finding (NDF) • In 2010 and 2011, exports of narwhal products from some areas were not allowed • CITES Parties will meet in spring 2013, and may request a review of narwhal trade • If trade is deemed harmful to the survival of the species, trade restrictions or bans could be imposed. • Important that the Narwhal Management Plan is approved and implemented by January 2013 Importance of Improving the Narwhal Management System • Improvements to the narwhal management system will assist • Co-management organizations to clearly demonstrate that narwhal harvesting is sustainable • Continued sustainable harvest for future generations of Inuit • Continued trade/export of narwhal tusks and products from Canada • A formal Management Plan will outline the management objectives for narwhal and the measures to achieve sustainable harvesting.
    [Show full text]