Late Phase Public Input Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Late Phase Public Input Report MEMORANDUM — Late Phase Public Input Report This report summarizes public feedback received during the MOMENTUM Pick Your Path public engagement effort. June 11, 2021 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Approach and Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Core Themes ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Participants ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Engagement Opportunities ................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Participation and Reach ......................................................................................................................5 2.3 Demographics ..................................................................................................................................... 7 3.0 What We Heard ...................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Scenario Feedback ............................................................................................................................. 8 3.1.1 Strategies, Priorities, and Challenges ......................................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Scenario Philosophy Preferences ............................................................................................. 11 3.1.3 Tax Rate Preferences ............................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Tradeoff Feedback ............................................................................................................................ 14 3.2.1 Tradeoff Question 1: Cutting Edge or Cost Effective ................................................................14 3.2.2 Tradeoff Question 2: Optimizing and Modernizing or Building New Facilities ..........................15 3.2.3 Tradeoff Question 3: Improve Access or Prepare for Growth ................................................... 16 3.2.4 Tradeoff Question 4: Faster Limited Transit or Slower Expanded Transit................................17 3.2.5 Tradeoff Question 5: Variety of Transportation Options or Short Predictable Commute .......... 17 3.3 Project Feedback .............................................................................................................................. 18 4.0 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 18 Appendices................................................................................................................................................ 19 Appendix A: MOMENTUM Comments ................................................................................................... 19 Scenario Planning Comments ............................................................................................................ 19 Tradeoff Comments ............................................................................................................................ 47 Appendix B: MOMENTUM Interactive Map Comments..........................................................................55 Freeway Projects ................................................................................................................................ 55 Transit Projects ................................................................................................................................... 64 Arterial Projects .................................................................................................................................. 66 Appendix C: MOMENTUM Live Chat Transcripts ..................................................................................69 Appendix D: MOMENTUM Virtual Public Events ...................................................................................74 MOMENTUM Live Virtual Events ....................................................................................................... 74 Pick your Path Events Summary Reports .......................................................................................... 75 Community Conversation Events Summary Reports ......................................................................... 81 Appendix E: MOMENTUM Presentations ............................................................................................... 88 MAG Policy Committee Presentations ............................................................................................... 88 Requested Presentations ................................................................................................................... 88 Maricopa Association of Governments June 2021 MOMENTUM Late Phase Public Input Report Page 1 of 146 Youth Commision Presentations ........................................................................................................ 88 Requested Presentations Summary Reports ..................................................................................... 89 Youth Commission Presentations Summary Reports ........................................................................ 96 Appendix F: Resource Agency Report ................................................................................................. 101 Resource Agency Invite List................................................................................................... .......... 101 Resource Agency Feedback Report ................................................................................................ 103 Appendix G: Outreach and Advertising Summary ................................................................................ 105 Appendix H: Social Media Comments .................................................................................................. 106 FACEBOOK ...................................................................................................................................... 107 INSTAGRAM .................................................................................................................................... 142 TWITTER .......................................................................................................................................... 144 List of Figures Figure 2-1 Scenario Planning Participation 5 Figure 2-2 MOMENTUM Social Media Engagement 6 Figure 2-3 Demographics of Website and Social Media Participants 7 Figure 3-1 What should be our top transportation strategy to address congestion in our region? 8 Figure 3-2 What should be our top transportation strategy to address congestion in our region (by engagement type) 9 Figure 3-3 What do you think is the biggest transportation challenge facing our region over the next 20+ years? 9 Figure 3-4 What do you think is the biggest transportation challenge facing our region over the next 20+ years (by engagement type) 10 Figure 3-5 Is there a scenario you like more than the others? 11 Figure 3-6 Examples of Preferred Combinations of Projects and Programs from Different Scenarios 12 Figure 3-7 Scenario Preference by Philosophy and Tax Rate 13 Figure 3-8 Tax Rate Preference 13 Figure 3-9 Is it important that our transportation investments be more cost effective or more innovative and cutting edge? 14 Figure 3-10 Given limited resources, should the region put more money towards optimizing and modernizing our existing transportation system or expanding and building new facilities? 15 Figure 3-11 Should the region focus more on improving access to regional destinations or preparing for growth? 16 Figure 3-12 When using transit, would you rather be able to reach fewer places with faster service or reach more places with slower service? 17 Figure 3-13 Is it more important for your quality of life to have a variety of ways to get around or a short predictable commute? 17 Maricopa Association of Governments June 2021 MOMENTUM Late Phase Public Input Report Page 2 of 146 1.0 Executive Summary MOMENTUM is the new, long-range transportation plan for the nation’s fastest growing metropolitan area— the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) region. The plan development process started in late 2019 and is anticipated to be finalized by the end of 2021. The plan will serve as a long-term blueprint for the regional transportation system; it will be comprised of both defined project investments and programmatic investments. Public participation is an integral part of the plan development and decision- making process. Public engagement is fundamental to the development of the Regional Transportation Plan. Thoughtful and inclusive public engagement ensures that decision makers consider public needs and interests, diverse viewpoints and values, and perspectives from across the region. 1.1 Approach and Purpose In this phase of MOMENTUM public engagement, feedback on four transportation scenarios
Recommended publications
  • International Child Abduction: Implementa- Tion of the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduc- Tion
    INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION: IMPLEMENTA- TION OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUC- TION HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Thursday, October 14, 1999 Serial No. 106±89 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 63±699 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 12:44 Jul 17, 2000 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 63699.TXT HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1 COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois HOWARD L. BERMAN, California DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa ELTON GALLEGLY, California MATTHEW G. MARTINEZ, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois CYNTHIA A. MCKINNEY, Georgia EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida PETER T. KING, New York PAT DANNER, Missouri STEVE CHABOT, Ohio EARL F. HILLIARD, Alabama MARSHALL ``MARK'' SANFORD, South BRAD SHERMAN, California Carolina ROBERT WEXLER, Florida MATT SALMON, Arizona STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey AMO HOUGHTON, New York JIM DAVIS, Florida TOM CAMPBELL, California EARL POMEROY, North Dakota JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts KEVIN BRADY, Texas GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York RICHARD BURR, North Carolina BARBARA LEE, California PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York GEORGE RADANOVICH, California JOSEPH M.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • KENNY PERRY Friday, April 18, 2014
    INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT: KENNY PERRY Friday, April 18, 2014 DAVE SENKO: Kenny, thank you for joining us. Good start, 4-under 68 today. Just share some thoughts on your round and then we'll get -- looks like you had four birdies and no bogeys. KENNY PERRY: Yeah, just kind of played like the rain, very steady. You know, the rain was just more aggravating than anything. It actually wasn't -- I mean it was chilly out there a little bit and the rain was aggravating but yet, you know, it didn't allow good scores to be shot. So I drove the ball nicely, I hit my irons good and made some key putts at the right time. So all in all it was just, you know, just a normal day at the office. I just seemed to not make any big mistakes and was able to hit the golf ball. My misses wound up in good spots and I was able to recover from them, and then I took advantage of the few good irons I hit in there close and was able to make a couple birdies. DAVE SENKO: Your birdies, No. 7. KENNY PERRY: On the back nine first? DAVE SENKO: Yeah, start at No. 12. KENNY PERRY: Oh, 12, I hit a 3-wood and a hybrid, a 4-iron hybrid. Man, that hole was playing long, dead into the wind, it was raining, it was gusty and I had about a 20 footer and I rolled it in. I probably got the only birdie there of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Fringe Season 1 Transcripts
    PROLOGUE Flight 627 - A Contagious Event (Glatterflug Airlines Flight 627 is enroute from Hamburg, Germany to Boston, Massachusetts) ANNOUNCEMENT: ... ist eingeschaltet. Befestigen sie bitte ihre Sicherheitsgürtel. ANNOUNCEMENT: The Captain has turned on the fasten seat-belts sign. Please make sure your seatbelts are securely fastened. GERMAN WOMAN: Ich möchte sehen wie der Film weitergeht. (I would like to see the film continue) MAN FROM DENVER: I don't speak German. I'm from Denver. GERMAN WOMAN: Dies ist mein erster Flug. (this is my first flight) MAN FROM DENVER: I'm from Denver. ANNOUNCEMENT: Wir durchfliegen jetzt starke Turbulenzen. Nehmen sie bitte ihre Plätze ein. (we are flying through strong turbulence. please return to your seats) INDIAN MAN: Hey, friend. It's just an electrical storm. MORGAN STEIG: I understand. INDIAN MAN: Here. Gum? MORGAN STEIG: No, thank you. FLIGHT ATTENDANT: Mein Herr, sie müssen sich hinsetzen! (sir, you must sit down) Beruhigen sie sich! (calm down!) Beruhigen sie sich! (calm down!) Entschuldigen sie bitte! Gehen sie zu ihrem Sitz zurück! [please, go back to your seat!] FLIGHT ATTENDANT: (on phone) Kapitän! Wir haben eine Notsituation! (Captain, we have a difficult situation!) PILOT: ... gibt eine Not-... (... if necessary...) Sprechen sie mit mir! (talk to me) Was zum Teufel passiert! (what the hell is going on?) Beruhigen ... (...calm down...) Warum antworten sie mir nicht! (why don't you answer me?) Reden sie mit mir! (talk to me) ACT I Turnpike Motel - A Romantic Interlude OLIVIA: Oh my god! JOHN: What? OLIVIA: This bed is loud. JOHN: You think? OLIVIA: We can't keep doing this.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Future-Of-Immortality-Remaking-Life
    The Future of Immortality Princeton Studies in Culture and Technology Tom Boellstorff and Bill Maurer, Series Editors This series presents innovative work that extends classic ethnographic methods and questions into areas of pressing interest in technology and economics. It explores the varied ways new technologies combine with older technologies and cultural understandings to shape novel forms of subjectivity, embodiment, knowledge, place, and community. By doing so, the series demonstrates the relevance of anthropological inquiry to emerging forms of digital culture in the broadest sense. Sounding the Limits of Life: Essays in the Anthropology of Biology and Beyond by Stefan Helmreich with contributions from Sophia Roosth and Michele Friedner Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society and Culture edited by Benjamin Peters Democracy’s Infrastructure: Techno- Politics and Protest after Apartheid by Antina von Schnitzler Everyday Sectarianism in Urban Lebanon: Infrastructures, Public Services, and Power by Joanne Randa Nucho Disruptive Fixation: School Reform and the Pitfalls of Techno- Idealism by Christo Sims Biomedical Odysseys: Fetal Cell Experiments from Cyberspace to China by Priscilla Song Watch Me Play: Twitch and the Rise of Game Live Streaming by T. L. Taylor Chasing Innovation: Making Entrepreneurial Citizens in Modern India by Lilly Irani The Future of Immortality: Remaking Life and Death in Contemporary Russia by Anya Bernstein The Future of Immortality Remaking Life and Death in Contemporary Russia Anya Bernstein
    [Show full text]
  • Emily Dickinson Introduction Emily Dickinson Was Born on December 10, 1830, in Amherst, Massachusetts
    Emily Dickinson Introduction Emily Dickinson was born on December 10, 1830, in Amherst, Massachusetts. She attended Mount Holyoke Female Seminary in South Hadley, but only for one year. Throughout her life, she seldom left her home and visitors were few. The people with whom she did come in contact, however, had an enormous impact on her poetry. She was particularly stirred by the Reverend Charles Wadsworth, whom she first met on a trip to Philadelphia. He left for the West Coast shortly after a visit to her home in 1860, and some critics believe his departure gave rise to the heartsick flow of verse from Dickinson in the years that followed. While it is certain that he was an important figure in her life, it is not clear that their relationship was romantic—she called him “my closest earthly friend.” Other possibilities for the unrequited love that was the subject of many of Dickinson’s poems include Otis P. Lord, a Massachusetts Supreme Court judge, and Samuel Bowles, editor of the Springfield Republican. By the 1860s, Dickinson lived in almost complete isolation from the outside world, but actively maintained many correspondences and read widely. She spent a great deal of this time with her family. Her father, Edward Dickinson, was actively involved in state and national politics, serving in Congress for one term. Her brother, Austin, who attended law school and became an attorney, lived next door with his wife, Susan Gilbert. Dickinson’s younger sister, Lavinia, also lived at home for her entire life in similar isolation. Lavinia and Austin were not only family, but intellectual companions for Dickinson during her lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • '"There's More Than One of Everything": Navigating Fringe's Cofactual Multiverse'
    . Volume 13, Issue 1 May 2016 ‘There’s More Than One of Everything’: Navigating Fringe’s cofactual multiverse Casey J. McCormick, McGill University, Montréal, Canada Abstract: This article analyzes how viewers of Fringe (FOX 2008-2013) make sense of the series’ complex science fictional storyworld. It argues that Fringe presents multiple iterations of worlds and characters in a way that encourages ‘cofactual’ interpretation: rather than figuring parallel universes and alternate timelines as ontologically hierarchical, the narrative accommodates all versions of reality and invites viewers to participate in shaping the multiverse. The article offers a close reading of Fringe’s complex narrative structure alongside an exploration of how audiences responded to and impacted the series through fannish practices such as vidding and narrative mapping. It concludes that cofactual narration opens up an array of participatory practices that blur the text/paratext distinction and facilitate interactive storyworld building. Keywords: Complex TV, Fandom, Narrative, Paratexts, Counterfactual, Cofactual, Possible Worlds Cofactual Interpretation By the time viewers reach the series finale of Fringe (FOX 2008-2013), they have travelled across two spatially-distinct universes, three versions of the future, and at least four different timelines, with each world-iteration populated by different versions of the show’s central characters. Through its reinvigoration of science fiction tropes, such as time travel, alternate realities, and temporal resets, Fringe asks viewers to re-evaluate typical models of narrative world-building. The series constructs a multiverse comprised of what I deem cofactual diegetic worlds. I use the term ‘cofactual’ in contradistinction to the more common narrative term ‘counterfactual’ as a means of emphasizing the plurality and simultaneity of diegetic worlds in Fringe.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Fringe (/Fringe/)2018
    Daniel Sloss interview - 2018 Edinburgh Fringe - British Comedy... https://www.comedy.co.uk/fringe/2018/features/daniel_sloss_inter... (/) TV (/TV/) RADIO (/RADIO/) FILM (/FILM/) Search Comedy.co.uk ONLINE (/ONLINE/) LIVE (/LIVE/) PEOPLE (/PEOPLE/) > (/OVERVIEW/) EE dd i nn bb uu rr gg hh FF rr i nn gg ee (( // ff rr i nn gg ee // )) 2018 (/fringe/beer52/) ! (()) Search 2010-2017 listings Home (/) / Live (/live/) / Fringe (/fringe/) / 2018 Features (/fringe/2018/features/) / Daniel Sloss interview Published: Sunday 15th July 2018 Daniel Sloss interview Daniel Sloss (/people/daniel_sloss/) is 27, yet one of the most established acts at the Edinburgh Festival, having started stand-up whilst still in his teens. This year he'll be performing 'X' - his 10th full-length show at the festival - at the big EICC venue. We interrupted one of his writing sessions to find out how preparations are going, and talk about his Netflix (/guide/channel/netflix/) deal. 1 of 8 15/07/2018, 15:10 Daniel Sloss interview - 2018 Edinburgh Fringe - British Comedy... https://www.comedy.co.uk/fringe/2018/features/daniel_sloss_inter... Hi Daniel. You've been performing at the Edinburgh Festival for over a decade now. Have you contemplated that statistic? It's sort of weird to think about. I remember being pretty much forced into my first Fringe show. I didn't want to do it because I didn't think I had the material. I didn't think I was ready and I wanted to what most comics do; wait until I had a show that I thought could win an award, or something.
    [Show full text]
  • TV Finales and the Meaning of Endings Casey J. Mccormick
    TV Finales and the Meaning of Endings Casey J. McCormick Department of English McGill University, Montréal A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Casey J. McCormick Table of Contents Abstract ………………………………………………………………………….…………. iii Résumé …………………………………………………………………..………..………… v Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………….……...…. vii Chapter One: Introducing Finales ………………………………………….……... 1 Chapter Two: Anticipating Closure in the Planned Finale ……….……… 36 Chapter Three: Binge-Viewing and Netflix Poetics …………………….….. 72 Chapter Four: Resisting Finality through Active Fandom ……………... 116 Chapter Five: Many Worlds, Many Endings ……………………….………… 152 Epilogue: The Dying Leader and the Harbinger of Death ……...………. 195 Bibliography ……………………………………………………………………………... 199 Primary Media Sources ………………………………………………………………. 211 iii Abstract What do we want to feel when we reach the end of a television series? Whether we spend years of our lives tuning in every week, or a few days bingeing through a storyworld, TV finales act as sites of negotiation between the forces of media production and consumption. By tracing a history of finales from the first Golden Age of American television to our contemporary era of complex TV, my project provides the first book- length study of TV finales as a distinct category of narrative media. This dissertation uses finales to understand how tensions between the emotional and economic imperatives of participatory culture complicate our experiences of television. The opening chapter contextualizes TV finales in relation to existing ideas about narrative closure, examines historically significant finales, and describes the ways that TV endings create meaning in popular culture. Chapter two looks at how narrative anticipation motivates audiences to engage communally in paratextual spaces and share processes of closure.
    [Show full text]
  • Bois-Franc Station — Rail Shuttle and Trainbus Shuttle 964 of the Société De Transport De Montréal (STM)
    Frequently asked questions Bois-Franc station — rail shuttle and Trainbus shuttle 964 of the Société de transport de Montréal (STM) ....... 3 1. How frequent will rail shuttle departures be? ................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Will bus departures from the Bois-Franc station be coordinated with the arrival of rail shuttles? ................................................................... 3 3. How will boarding bus shuttles work at the Bois-Franc Station? ..................................................................................................................... 3 4. Will a bus boarding platform be built at the Bois-Franc station? ..................................................................................................................... 3 5. How long will bus shuttle 964 need to reach the Côte-Vertu metro station? ................................................................................................... 3 6. How will evening rush hours work, given that the rail shuttle will depart every 30 minutes? ........................................................................... 3 7. Can we park at the Bois-Franc station to use bus shuttles during the work? .................................................................................................. 4 8. Major work is planned at the Côte-Vertu metro station. How will users be impacted by the work? ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ADS Chapter 522 Performance of Temporary Duty Travel
    ADS Chapter 522 Performance of Temporary Duty Travel in the U.S. and Abroad Partial Revision Date: 11/03/2020 Responsible Office: M/MS/TTD File Name: 522_110320 11/03/2020 Partial Revision Functional Series 500 – Management Services ADS 522 – Performance of Temporary Duty Travel in the U.S. and Abroad POC for ADS 522: Kenneth Hawkins, (202) 921-5022, [email protected] Table of Contents 522.1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................ 5 522.2 PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................ 5 522.3 POLICY DIRECTIVES AND REQUIRED PROCEDURES ........ 7 522.3.1 Travel Authorizations for Temporary Duty Travel................................. 7 522.3.2 E2 User Requests .................................................................................... 8 522.3.3 Preparation and Approval of TDY Travel Authorizations ..................... 8 522.3.4 Documents Required for TDY Travel Authorizations ......................... 10 522.3.5 Travel Prior to the Issuance of an Authorize Travel Authorization (Emergency Use Only) ........................................................................... 11 522.3.6 Amending an E2 Travel Authorization ................................................. 12 522.3.6.1 Cancelling an E2 Travel Authorization ..................................................... 13 522.3.6.2 An In-conjunction With Travel Authorization ............................................ 13 522.3.7 Ticket Changes .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fichetechnique REM Mesures D'attenuation ANGLAIS
    REM MITIGATION MEASURES Mascouche/Terrebonne areas REPENTIGENNTTIT GNYG Y MASCOUCHEUCCHHEHE MASCOUCHE REPENTIGNY STATION STATION 2020 640 TERREBONNEE ON 30 0 B TERREBONNE 14 TERREBONNE U S STATION VARENNESNES TERMINAL S H U T T 15 L E MONTRÉALMMOONTRRÉAL- ESST 25 LAVAL 30 30 640 440 BUS SHUTTLE E 140 IN L E BOUCHERBOUCHB CHERVILLEVIV E H C 40 SAUVÉ U 20 Bus terminal O STATION C MONMOONNTRÉALNTTRÉA S A RADISSON Train station M STATION Metro station AHUNTSIC LOLONGUEUILN U STATION Reserved lane PREFERRED ROUTE RUSH HOURS (WEEKDAYS) 1 Line 30 from the Terrebonne terminal to the Radisson station (±30 min) → or line 140 from Lachenaie to the Radisson station (±60 min) → or bus shuttle from the Terrebonne station to the Radisson station (±35 min) → or bus shuttle from the Mascouche station to the Radisson station (±45 min) 2 Metro from the Radisson station to the Bonaventure station (±30 min) ALTERNATIVE ROUTES 1 Train line exo 5 Mascouche from the Mascouche station to the Sauvé station (±45 min) 2 Walk to the Sauvé1 metro station ±1 h 05* 3 Metro from the Sauvé station to the Bonaventure station (±20 min) 1 → or train line exo 5 Mascouche from the Mascouche station to the Central Station (see reverse side for map) • 3 departures during the morning and evening rush hours • Commissioning in 2020 ±1 h 25 * The travel time does not include transfers between different transportation modes. 1- The orange line is very busy between the Montmorency and Berri-UQAM stations. Users are encouraged to choose another route. REM MITIGATION MEASURES Mascouche/Terrebonne
    [Show full text]