DOCSLIB.ORG

The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT to the Convention on Biological Diversity of the Republic of Macedonia Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Skopje, 2014 FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT to the Convention on Biological Diversity of the Republic of Macedonia Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Skopje, 2014 Information CONCERNING THE REPORTING PARTY Contracting Party REPUBLIC of MACEDONIA NATIONAL Focal POINT Full name of the institution Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Daniela Rendevska, Name and title of contact officer Head of Unit for multilateral cooperatioon Goce Delcev bb, MTV building, 1000 Skopje, Mailing address Republic of Macedonia Telephone +389 2 3251 438 Fax +389 2 3220 165 E-mail [email protected] CONTacT OFFICER FOR NATIONAL REPORT (IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE) Administration of Environment, Full name of the institution Department of Nature Protection Vlatko Trpeski, Name and title of contact officer Head of Department of Nature Protection Goce Delcev bb, MTV building, 1000 Skopje, Mailing address Republic of Macedonia Telephone +389 2 3251 462 Fax +389 2 3220165 E-mail [email protected] Submission Signature of officer responsible for Nurhan Izairi, submitting national report Minister of Environment and Physical Planning Date of submission October 2014 4 FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity of the Republic of Macedonia is prepared in the framework of the project “Support to the Republic of Macedonia for revision of National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) and preparation of the Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity”. Project duration: January 2013 – December 2014 Financed by: Global Environment Facility (GEF) GEF Implementation Agency: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Beneficiary: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Expert support for preparation of the report: Robertina Brajanoska, M.Sc., National Consultant for Project Coordination Acad. Vlado Matevski, Team Leader Avramoski Oliver, PhD Velevski Metodija, PhD Prof. Velkovski Nikolco, PhD Prof. Ivanovska Sonja, PhD Prof. Karadelev Mitko, PhD Prof. Kostadinovski Mitko, PhD Prof. Levkov Zlatko, PhD Prof. Melovski Ljupco, PhD Melovska Natalija, M. Sc. Doc. Slavevska Stamenkovic Valentina, PhD Stipcarov Boris Prof. Hristovski Slavco, PhD Prof. Dzabirski Vladimir, PhD Acknowledgment to the Nature Department staff in MEPP for providing support and information for the preparation of the report. Translation: Vera Mircevska Jovanovska Photos: Ljubo Stefanov, except on p. 85 Despina Kitanova 5 CONTENTS Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................8 Summary ......................................................................................................................9 Part I: An overview on biodiversity status, trends and threats and implications for humanwell-being .................................................................................. 16 1.1 The importance of biodiversity in Macedonia .................................................16 1.1.1. About the country .............................................................................................16 1.1.2. About biodiversity .............................................................................................17 1.1.3. About ecosystem services ...............................................................................18 1.2 Status and trends of biological diversity in Macedonia ..................................25 1.3. Main threats to biological diversity in Macedonia ...........................................34 1.3.1 Direct causes for biological diversity loss .......................................................34 1.3.2 Root causes of biological diversity loss ..........................................................39 1.4. Impacts of the changes in biodiversity ............................................................40 1.5. Possible future changes for biodiversity and their implications for human well-being ......................................................................................42 1.5.1. Climate change impact ....................................................................................42 1.5.2. Infrastructure projects impact ........................................................................44 1.5.3. Tourism development zones ............................................................................45 Part II: Development of National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan, its implementation, and the mainstreaming of biodiversity ........................... 46 2.1. National biological diversity targets ................................................................46 2.2. National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan – process of revision and incorporation of Aichi targets ..........................................................................48 2.2.1. Analysis of the implementation of the First Action Plan for Biological Diversity ..........................................................................................49 2.2.2. Process of NBSAP revision ..............................................................................50 2.3. Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity on national level 51 2.3.1. Policy for biodiversity protection .....................................................................51 2.3.2. Activities for legal protection of biodiversity ...................................................61 2.3.3. Biological diversity monitoring and databases ...............................................70 2.3.4. International and/or cross-border cooperation for biological diversity protection ..........................................................................72 2.4. Implementation of the thematic programmes of work under the Convention on Biological Diversity related to cross-cutting issues ........82 2.4.1. Programme of Work for protected areas ........................................................82 2.4.2. Global Strategy for Plants Conservation (2011-2020) ....................................83 2.4.3. Education and public awareness rising of the importance of biological diversity .......................................................................................84 2.4.4. Implementation of Cartagena protocol on Biosafety ......................................88 6 FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 2.4.5. Nagoya Protocol ...............................................................................................88 2.5. Integration of biodiversity into relevant sectoral strategies, plans and programmes .....................................................................................................89 2.5.1. Relevant strategic and planning documents ..................................................89 2.5.2. Relevant sectoral strategies ............................................................................91 2.6. Tools used in biological diversity integration ..................................................94 2.7. Synergies with other relevant conventions .....................................................95 Part III: Progress towards implementation of Aichi Targets to 2020 and contribution to relevant Millenium Development Goals by 2015 ................ 96 3.1. Progress towards the implementation of the Global Strategic Plan for Biological Diversity for 2011-2020 and Aichi targets ........................96 3.2. Contribution of actions for CBD implementation towards relevant Millennium Development Goals ........................................................97 3.3. Challenges, lessons learned and recommendations .....................................98 Annexes .................................................................................................................... 100 Annex I Information regarding the process of preparation of the Fifth national report .........................................................................................101 Annex II List of Projects .................................................................................................101 Annex III List of adopted secondary legislation on the basis of the Law on Nature Protection .........................................................................................................105 Аnnex IV Overview of the ratified multilateral agrements in the area of environment and nature ..............................................................................106 Аnnex V References and used sources of information .................................................108 7 ABBREViationS CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CEPF Critical Ecosystems Partnership Fund CLC Corine Land Cover CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora ECNC European Centre for Nature Conservation ЕЕА European Environmental Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EU European Union EUNIS European Nature Information System GEF Global Environment Facility GIZ German Society for International Cooperation GMO genetically modified organisms IBA Important Bird Areas IPA Important Plant Areas IUCN International Union for Nature Conservation MAFWE Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy MASA Macedonian Academy of Science and Arts MEPP Ministry
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Survey of Fungi at the University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Field Station
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Field Station Bulletins UWM Field Station Spring 1993 A survey of fungi at the University of Wisconsin- Waukesha Field Station Alan D. Parker University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/fieldstation_bulletins Part of the Forest Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Parker, A.D. 1993 A survey of fungi at the University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Field Station. Field Station Bulletin 26(1): 1-10. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Field Station Bulletins by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Survey of Fungi at the University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Field Station Alan D. Parker Department of Biological Sciences University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188 Introduction The University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Field Station was founded in 1967 through the generous gift of a 98 acre farm by Ms. Gertrude Sherman. The facility is located approximately nine miles west of Waukesha on Highway 18, just south of the Waterville Road intersection. The site consists of rolling glacial deposits covered with old field vegetation, 20 acres of xeric oak woods, a small lake with marshlands and bog, and a cold water stream. Other communities are being estab- lished as a result of restoration work; among these are mesic prairie, oak opening, and stands of various conifers. A long-term study of higher fungi and Myxomycetes, primarily from the xeric oak woods, was started in 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • On Tropical Drosera Rotundifolia L
    Technical Refereed Contribution On tropical Drosera rotundifolia L. Andreas Fleischmann • Botanische Staatssammlung München and GeoBio-Center LMU University • Menzinger Strasse 67 • D-80638 Munich • Germany • [email protected] Abstract: Two aspects on the morphology and biology of the Philippine population of D. rotundifo- lia were not answered by Coritico and Fleischmann (2016), namely its seed morphology and sea- sonal growth cycle - especially regarding hibernaculum formation, as it is known from its temperate congeners. These gaps can now be covered from observations made from cultivated plants and shall be reported here. Further aspects on the biology of Philippine D. rotundifolia (and other tropical populations of temperate Drosera) in cultivation and natural habitat are presented. Distribution and altitudinal range of Drosera rotundifolia The generic type species of Drosera, Drosera rotundifolia L., is probably the most well-known sundew species, at least to people from the Northern Hemisphere. It is also the most widespread1, its range spans the entire boreal region (Fig. 1; Meusel et al. 1965). Its southernmost populations in the Northern Hemisphere are situated in SE China, in the mountain ranges of northern Guangdong province, at ca. 24.5°N (Coritico & Fleischmann 2016). In Europe its more or less continuous range reaches to ca. 39°N to the south in central Spain, in North America to ca. 34°N in northern Georgia and Alabama states, in Japan to 30°N on the island of Yakushima (Coritico & Fleischmann 2016). Additionally, D. rotundifolia shows a few isolated outlier populations in some areas of the Mediter- ranean [e.g. on the isle of Corsica, France (Delange & Hugot 2020), in the Sierra Nevada of southern Spain (Lorite 2016), and in northern Greece (just three sites known in the Rhodope Mountains; The- odoropoulos & Eleftheriadou 2012)], in central Lebanon (Diels 1906; Tohmé & Tohmé 2007; despite erroneous claims, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Chorioactidaceae: a New Family in the Pezizales (Ascomycota) with Four Genera
    mycological research 112 (2008) 513–527 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres Chorioactidaceae: a new family in the Pezizales (Ascomycota) with four genera Donald H. PFISTER*, Caroline SLATER, Karen HANSENy Harvard University Herbaria – Farlow Herbarium of Cryptogamic Botany, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA article info abstract Article history: Molecular phylogenetic and comparative morphological studies provide evidence for the Received 15 June 2007 recognition of a new family, Chorioactidaceae, in the Pezizales. Four genera are placed in Received in revised form the family: Chorioactis, Desmazierella, Neournula, and Wolfina. Based on parsimony, like- 1 November 2007 lihood, and Bayesian analyses of LSU, SSU, and RPB2 sequence data, Chorioactidaceae repre- Accepted 29 November 2007 sents a sister clade to the Sarcosomataceae, to which some of these taxa were previously Corresponding Editor: referred. Morphologically these genera are similar in pigmentation, excipular construction, H. Thorsten Lumbsch and asci, which mostly have terminal opercula and rounded, sometimes forked, bases without croziers. Ascospores have cyanophilic walls or cyanophilic surface ornamentation Keywords: in the form of ridges or warts. So far as is known the ascospores and the cells of the LSU paraphyses of all species are multinucleate. The six species recognized in these four genera RPB2 all have limited geographical distributions in the northern hemisphere. Sarcoscyphaceae ª 2007 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Sarcosomataceae SSU Introduction indicated a relationship of these taxa to the Sarcosomataceae and discussed the group as the Chorioactis clade. Only six spe- The Pezizales, operculate cup-fungi, have been put on rela- cies are assigned to these genera, most of which are infre- tively stable phylogenetic footing as summarized by Hansen quently collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgarian Restaurant Chevermeto
    EXHIBITIONS / Изложения January - June 2018 HELLO WINTER STORY Health and Sport FESTIVAL Здраве и спорт 20 - 21.01. International Tourist Fair HOLIDAY & SPA EXPO Международна туристическа борса 14 - 16.02. LUXURY WEDDINGS Wedding and Events Industry EXPO Сватбена и събитийна индустрия 23 - 25.02. BULGARIA BUILDING Building Materials and Machines WEEK Строителни материали и машини 07 - 10.03. Safety&Security SECURITY EXPO Цялостни решения за сигурност и безопасност 07 - 10.03. GRAND CHOCOLATE Chocolate and Chocolate Products FESTIVAL Шоколад и шоколадови продукти 10 - 11.03. BEBEMANIA – Baby and Kids Products SHOPPING Всичко за бъдещите и настоящи родители 16 - 18.03. VOLKSWAGEN CLUB Event for the Fans of the Brand FEST Събитие за феновете на марката 17 - 18.03. Machinery, Industrial Equipment and Innovative MACHTECH & Technologies INNOTECH EXPO Индустриални машини, оборудване 26- 29.03. и иновационни технологии Water and Water Management WATER SOFIA Води и воден мениджмънт 27 - 29.03. Woodworking and Furniture Industry TECHNOMEBEL Дървообработваща и мебелна промишленост 24 - 28.04. WORLD OF Furniture, Interior textile and home accessories Обзавеждане, интериорен текстил 24 - 28.04. FURNITURE и аксесоари за дома BULMEDICA / Medical and Dental Industry BULDENTAL Медицина 16 - 18.05. September - December 2018 HUNTING, FISHING, Hunting and Sport Weapons, Fishing Accessories, Sport Ловни и с портни оръжия, риболовни 27 - 30.09. SPORT принадлежности, спорт Communication Art, Print, Image, Sign COPI’S Рекламни и печатни комуникации 02 - 04.10. Aesthetics, Cosmetics, SPA, Health, Hair, ARENA OF BEAUTY Nail, Mackeup 05 - 07.10. Форум за здраве, красота и естетика Baby and Kids Products BEBEMANIA Всичко за бъдещите и настоящи родители 19 - 21.10.
    [Show full text]
  • SOFIA-CITY May 2020.Pdf
    Your complimentary copy of the Sofia City®Info 4 OVERVIEW Guide is available from hotel rooms, hotel receptions and other public areas at the following 18 ACCOMMODATION top-class Hotels & Services Apartments: HOTELS êêê 28 RESTAURANTS êêêêê Hotel Villa Boyana Arena di Serdika Gloria Palace 30 SHOPS Sofia Hotel Balkan Montecito Hotel Hilton Hotel Meg-Lozenetz Hotel Holiday Inn Sofia Hotel Park Hotel Moskva 32 NIGHT LIFE Intercontinental Hotel Sofia Place Hotel êêêê êê 34 CULTURE Art ‘Otel The House Hotel BWP Hotel Expo BW City Hotel ê 38 BG IN BRRIEF BW Premier Sofia easyHotel Coop Hotel 42 USEFUL NUMBERS Grami Hotel Maria Luisa Hotel Metropolitan Hotel Sofia City ® Info Guide Novotel Sofia Hotel Ramada Hotel Publisher: RENTAL DS Ltd. Design: RENTAL DS Ltd. APARTMENT RENTALS & HOSTELS Apartment House Bulgaria On the Cover: Photo by Boris Mutafchiev Block 531 Translation: Translingua Ltd. Be My Guest Hostel Print: Janet 45 Ltd. 5 Vintage Marinella For Advertising, Bulk Orders and Subscriptions: (before 10th of the preceding month, please!) SUBSCRIPTION DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS Cell: 0896 717 225; 0888 311 884 OTHERS E-mail: [email protected] facebook.com/cityinfoguides.bulgaria Airport Sofia Inter Expo Center facebook.com/BulgariaInfoGuides Airline Companies Information Center Sofia Business Centres (Largo, Chitalnyata) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be Galleries reproduced in any form or by any means without prior Car Hire Companies permission. Monthly circulation: 20 000 Central Bus Station Real Estate Agencies Cultural Institutes Top Restaurants & Bars Casinos Travel Agencies COMMERCIAL AND ECONOMIC SECTION OF THE EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN: FRANCE, GERMANY, GREECE, KAZAKHSTAN, MONTENEGRO, MACEDONIA, MOLDOVA, ROMANIA, SERBIA, SLOVAK REPUBLIC, SLOVENIA, THE NETHERLANDS, UK OVERVIEW 3 Inter Expo Center Information Center Sofia (Largo, Chitalnyata) Galleries Real Estate Agencies Top Restaurants & Bars Travel Agencies 4 OVERVIEW public organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (719Kb)
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org ||Volume 5 Issue 12||December. 2016 || PP.24-31 Historical–Geographic Overview Life Cycle of Tourism and Hospitality in Dojran and Dojran Lake in Republic of Macedonia Nikola V.Dimitrov (PHD)1, Cane Koteski (PHD)2, Tanja Angelkova Petkova (PHD)3, DejanMetodijeski (PHD)4, Dusko Josevski5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (Faculty of tourism and business Logistics – Gevgelija;, University “GoceDelcev” – Stip, R.Macedonia) Abstract: Dojran and Dojran Lake is a specific tourist area located in the southeast region in the Republic of Macedonia.The aim of this paper is to identify the beginning and explain the historical and geographical order of appearance, changes and processes in tourism and hospitality, and parallel to it determines the relationship of the life cycle of tourism in Dojran region. In this space tourism is based on the values of the natural triad, air– water-land,so most tourists use their time for various recreational,sports,health and other activities in and around the lake water. To confirm hypothesis we are using multiple research methods.Research starts with a descriptive method,continue with the evolutive and ends up with empirical method. In addition we use statistical, cartographic and other methods. According to the data from our research the lake and the settlement develop cyclically together with tourism.From the research we established a cycle which in the period of its maximum development is interrupted,and which soon begins to stabilize and rejuvenates with real indicatiors of tourism growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Typification of Gyromitra Fastigiata and Helvella Grandis
    Preliminary phylogenetic and morphological studies in the Gyromitra gigas lineage (Pezizales). 2. Typification of Gyromitra fastigiata and Helvella grandis Nicolas VAN VOOREN Abstract: Helvella fastigiata and H. grandis are epitypified with material collected in the original area. Matteo CARBONE Gyromitra grandis is proposed as a new combination and regarded as a priority synonym of G. fastigiata. The status of Gyromitra slonevskii is also discussed. photographs of fresh specimens and original plates illustrate the article. Keywords: ascomycota, phylogeny, taxonomy, four new typifications. Ascomycete.org, 11 (3) : 69–74 Mise en ligne le 08/05/2019 Résumé : Helvella fastigiata et H. grandis sont épitypifiés avec du matériel récolté dans la région d’origine. 10.25664/ART-0261 Gyromitra grandis est proposé comme combinaison nouvelle et regardé comme synonyme prioritaire de G. fastigiata. le statut de Gyromitra slonevskii est également discuté. Des photographies de spécimens frais et des planches originales illustrent cet article. Riassunto: Helvella fastigiata e H. grandis vengono epitipificate con materiale raccolto nelle rispettive zone d’origine. Gyromitra grandis viene proposta come nuova combinazione e ritenuta sinonimo prioritario di G. fastigiata. Viene inoltre discusso lo status di Gyromitra slonevskii. l’articolo viene corredato da foto di esem- plari freschi e delle tavole originali. Introduction paul-de-Varces, alt. 1160 m, 45.07999° n 5.627088° e, in a mixed for- est, 11 May 2004, leg. e. Mazet, pers. herb. n.V. 2004.05.01. During a preliminary morphological and phylogenetic study in the subgenus Discina (Fr.) Harmaja (Carbone et al., 2018), especially Results the group of species close to Gyromitra gigas (Krombh.) Quél., we sequenced collections of G.
    [Show full text]
  • EVERGREEN TREES for NEBRASKA Justin Evertson & Bob Henrickson
    THE NEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORETUM PRESENTS EVERGREEN TREES FOR NEBRASKA Justin Evertson & Bob Henrickson. For more plant information, visit plantnebraska.org or retreenbraska.unl.edu Throughout much of the Great Plains, just a handful of species make up the majority of evergreens being planted. This makes them extremely vulnerable to challenges brought on by insects, extremes of weather, and diseases. Utilizing a variety of evergreen species results in a more diverse and resilient landscape that is more likely to survive whatever challenges come along. Geographic Adaptability: An E indicates plants suitable primarily to the Eastern half of the state while a W indicates plants that prefer the more arid environment of western Nebraska. All others are considered to be adaptable to most of Nebraska. Size Range: Expected average mature height x spread for Nebraska. Common & Proven Evergreen Trees 1. Arborvitae, Eastern ‐ Thuja occidentalis (E; narrow habit; vertically layered foliage; can be prone to ice storm damage; 20‐25’x 5‐15’; cultivars include ‘Techny’ and ‘Hetz Wintergreen’) 2. Arborvitae, Western ‐ Thuja plicata (E; similar to eastern Arborvitae but not as hardy; 25‐40’x 10‐20; ‘Green Giant’ is a common, fast growing hybrid growing to 60’ tall) 3. Douglasfir (Rocky Mountain) ‐ Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (soft blue‐green needles; cones have distinctive turkey‐foot bract; graceful habit; avoid open sites; 50’x 30’) 4. Fir, Balsam ‐ Abies balsamea (E; narrow habit; balsam fragrance; avoid open, windswept sites; 45’x 20’) 5. Fir, Canaan ‐ Abies balsamea var. phanerolepis (E; similar to balsam fir; common Christmas tree; becoming popular as a landscape tree; very graceful; 45’x 20’) 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection of the Dojran Lake Catchment Area
    RMZ - Materials and Geoenvironment, Vol 50, No 1, pp 369-372, 2003 369 Environmental protection of the Dojran Lake catchment area RISTO STOJANOV1, BRANKA TRÈEK2, TADEJ DOLENEC3, TRAJAN DIMKOVSKI2 & SIMON PIRC3 1Faculty of Mining and Geology, Goce Delèev 89, 2000 tip, Macedonia; E-mail: info@rgf#ukim#edu#mk 2Geological Survey of Slovenia, Dimièeva ul# 14, SI-100 Ljubljana, Slovenia; E-mail: branka#trcek@geo-zs#si, dimkovski@amis#net 3Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Department of Geology, Akerèeva 12, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; E-mail: tadej#dolenec@ntfgeo#uni-lj#si, simon#pirc@guest#arnes#si Abstract: This paper points out the need of solving the ecological problems of the Dojran Lake and its catchment area, which mainly result from the overexploitation of water sources The most important results of hydrogeological and hydrological investigations are presented and the vulnerability of the territory is characterized Key words: Dojran lake, water sources, overexploitation, ecological problems INTRODUCTION The Dojran Lake and its catchment area are very important sources for the public, industrial and, especially, agricultural water supply The Dojran Lake is located in the south-eastern part of Macedonia on the border with Greece (Figure 1) at 148 m of the altitude The water resources of the Dojran Lake catchment area have been overexploited, which resulted in numerous ecological problems The lake fauna and flora has been changed - many species disappeared, but some new ones appeared that had not been typical for that environment
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Pines in the Arboretum
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MtJ ARBORETUM REVIEW No. 32-198 PETER C. MOE Pines in the Arboretum Pines are probably the best known of the conifers native to The genus Pinus is divided into hard and soft pines based on the northern hemisphere. They occur naturally from the up­ the hardness of wood, fundamental leaf anatomy, and other lands in the tropics to the limits of tree growth near the Arctic characteristics. The soft or white pines usually have needles in Circle and are widely grown throughout the world for timber clusters of five with one vascular bundle visible in cross sec­ and as ornamentals. In Minnesota we are limited by our cli­ tions. Most hard pines have needles in clusters of two or three mate to the more cold hardy species. This review will be with two vascular bundles visible in cross sections. For the limited to these hardy species, their cultivars, and a few hy­ discussion here, however, this natural division will be ignored brids that are being evaluated at the Arboretum. and an alphabetical listing of species will be used. Where neces­ Pines are readily distinguished from other common conifers sary for clarity, reference will be made to the proper groups by their needle-like leaves borne in clusters of two to five, of particular species. spirally arranged on the stem. Spruce (Picea) and fir (Abies), Of the more than 90 species of pine, the following 31 are or for example, bear single leaves spirally arranged. Larch (Larix) have been grown at the Arboretum. It should be noted that and true cedar (Cedrus) bear their leaves in a dense cluster of many of the following comments and recommendations are indefinite number, whereas juniper (Juniperus) and arborvitae based primarily on observations made at the University of (Thuja) and their related genera usually bear scalelikie or nee­ Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, and plant performance dlelike leaves that are opposite or borne in groups of three.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreams and Nightmares of Latin American Ascomycete Taxonomists
    DREAMS AND NIGHTMARES OF NEOTROPICAL ASCOMYCETE TAXONOMISTS Richard P. Korf Emeritus Professor of Mycology at Cornell University & Emeritus Curator of the Cornell Plant Pathology Herbarium, Ithaca, New York A talk presented at the VII Congress of Latin American Mycology, San José, Costa Rica, July 20, 2011 ABSTRACT Is taxonomic inquiry outdated, or cutting edge? A reassessment is made of the goals, successes, and failures of taxonomists who study the fungi of the Neotropics, with a view toward what we should do in the future if we are to have maximum scientific and societal impact. Ten questions are posed, including: Do we really need names? Who is likely to be funding our future research? Is the collapse of the Ivory Tower of Academia a dream or a nightmare? I have been invited here to present a talk on my views on what taxonomists working on Ascomycetes in the Neotropics should be doing. Why me? Perhaps just because I am one of the oldest ascomycete taxonomists, who just might have some shreds of wisdom to impart. I take the challenge seriously, and somewhat to my surprise I have come to some conclusions that shock me, as well they may shock you. OUR HISTORY Let's take a brief view of the time frame I want to talk about. It's really not that old. Most of us think of Elias Magnus Fries as the "father of mycology," a starting point for fungal names as the sanctioning author for most of the fungi. In 1825 Fries was halfway through his Systema Mycologicum, describing and illustrating fungi on what he could see without the aid of a microscope.
    [Show full text]